implementing osha in the construction industry- a review
DESCRIPTION
Implementing occupational safety and health programs in many construction sites are easier said than done. Discuss.TRANSCRIPT
PROGRAMME : EXECUTIVE DIPLOMA in PROJECT MANAGEMENT
MODULE : MODULE 5:Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
FACILITATOR : Lt. Kol. Ahmad Zubir
MATRIX ID : JX78946HP702
DATE OF SUBMISSION : Feb 23, 2009
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
Table of Contents
1 Introduction Summary..............................................................................................32 Occupational Safety and Health...............................................................................6
2.1 What is occupational safety and health?..............................................................62.1.1 Occupational Safety and Health Act............................................................7
3 Factors and failures in implementing occupational safety and health programs93.1.1 Attitude of Site Management Team.............................................................93.1.2 Lack of Enforcement by Proper Authority..................................................93.1.3 Ineffective Safety Campaign.....................................................................103.1.4 Inadequate Safety Training and Course.....................................................103.1.5 Incompetent Safety Officer........................................................................10
4 Steps and Measure to overcome problems of occupational safety and health...104.1.1 Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems (OHS-MS).........114.1.2 OHSAS 18001: 1996 (Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series)
124.1.3 Application of Occupational Safety and Health in different countries......14
5 Conclusion................................................................................................................166 Appendixes...............................................................................................................187 References..................................................................................................................20
2
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
1 Introduction Summary
Implementing occupational safety and health programs in many construction sites are easier said than done. Please discuss what are the problems faced and what steps/ measures to be taken to overcome these problems.
In an industry where it is the largest contributor to labor consumption, the
construction industry is renowned for its occupational hazards. It is an industry that is
more commonly related to risky, hazardous and unsafe. The occupational hazard of the
industry relates to the number of high incidences of accidents and fatalities that occur
globally on construction sites. Also, situations, tools, or other elements may be either
imminently dangerous referring to an impending or immediate risk such as a bare
electrical cord, or inherently dangerous such as poisons, explosives or chemicals. (The
Business Roundtable, 1983; Churcher and Alwani-Starr, 1996; Brown, 1996;
Rowlinson, 2000; Smallwood and Haupt, 2000).
Even with strict governing legislations and policies regarding safety and health,
high rates of injury and fatality still persists. Policies and legislation such as OSHA or
Occupational Safety and Health Act are designed to ensure that the working environment
is safe and healthy. In addition to having regulations, you have governing bodies that
ensure occupational safety is adhered to in the workplace. These organizations are:
CIDB or Construction Industry Development Board
NIOSH or National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health
NCOSH or National Council of Occupational Safety and Health
Department of Safety and Health or known as DOSH.
3
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
In addition to these national regulatory bodies, we should also not discount the local
government and municipal authorities that work within a regulatory or legislative
enforcement capacity to ensure safety in the workplace (Gee and Saito, 1997). Industry
professionals as well as academics have noted that regulations and legislation by
themselves are not enough to bring about a desired goal of zero accidents and incidents
on construction sites.
Though regulations and legislation are not enough to ensure guaranteed safety but
by adhering to these regulation and policies, it does improve site safety. With regards to
cost, it is minimal as this can improves construction safety at minimal or no extra cost.
However, without proper codes and standard, the results can be the absolute reverse.
Increased costs and disputes can arise from delays in construction progress, penalties for
these delays, financial losses, personal injuries and fatalities. Regardless of the strictly
enforced safety and health regulations in most countries, high rates of injury and fatality
do persist (Center to Protect Workers’ Rights1993; Ratay1997).
It is widely accepted that the construction industry is a significant driver for a
country’s economy. This is due to its labor-intensive activities and operations (Haupt
1996). In Europe, the construction industry employs about 7.5% of the total industrial
workforce (some 11 million workers). However, due to employment risk and hazards, the
industry in Europe accounts for 17.5% of all work-related accidents and injuries (some 1
million accidents per year). The industry is responsible for about 22.5% of all
4
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
occupational deaths, representing some 1500 fatal accidents per year (Berger 2000; Dias
and Coble 1999).
In Malaysia, the construction industry has been recognized as one of the driving
factors of economic development. However, the industry in Malaysia itself is not without
its negativity, this is due to its high rates of accidents and fatalities incidences that have
occurred on sites. According to the statistics reported by the Social Security Organisation
(SOCSO) the number of fatality cases in the construction industry are among the highest
in the 10 categorized industries in Malaysia (SOCSO 2004)
Table 1- Number of death cases reported from 2000 – 2004
Despite the negative safety record of the construction industry, the fate of the
economy is intertwined together with the construction industry. This is because of the
consequence of the forward and backward linkages between the construction industry and
the rest of the economy. Backward linkages refer, to the materials and services sectors of
5
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
the economy and forward linkages refer to the result of economic activities from the use
of the constructed buildings and facilities (Drewer 1980; Ahmad and Yan 1996). In
addition, economic growth is related to the robustness of growth in the construction
industry. For example, in the United Kingdom, the construction industry had an
economic output estimated at $87 billion in 1998, which constitutes approximately 10%
of the GDP. In China, while the GDP was growing rapidly since 1979, the share of the
construction industry as a percentage of GDP increased as well. However, this does not
mean that safety at the workplace should be ignored as this is an issue that affects all
businesses since most companies do not feel that it is vital to the success and are afraid of
possibility of prosecution (Construction Task Force 1998; Bakri et al 2006; Ahmad and
Yan 1996).
2 Occupational Safety and Health
2.1 What is occupational safety and health?
It is the responsibility of management to provide a safe and conducive working
environment where the employees will be able to contribute to the organization. For the
construction industry, management should place emphasis on finding a management
strategy and resolution to reducing the rate of accident occurrence as well as live saving
at the construction site.
As a result, there exists legislation to ensuring that the workplace is a safe place of
work. In Malaysia, this legislation is called the Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1994. This important piece of legislation is to promote and encourage occupational safety
6
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
and health awareness among workers and to create organizations along with effective
safety and health measures.
This regulation would be carried out by self-regulation schemes that match the
industry or related organization. This Act, which contains 15 sections, is a measure that
supersedes any conflict in existing occupational safety and health laws such as the
Factory and Machinery Act 1967. The Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994
complements any existing legislative provision and if there are any conflicts, the
Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994 will overcome it (Laws of Malaysia 2000).
2.1.1 Occupational Safety and Health Act
The objectives of Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994 (OSHA) as stipulated
in the ‘Objects of the Act’ are as follows (Laws of Malaysia 2000):
To secure the safety, health and welfare of persons at work against risks to safety
or health arising out of the activities of persons at work.
To protect persons at a place of work other than persons at work against risks to
safety or health arising out of the activities of person at work.
To promote an occupational environment for persons at work this is adapted to
their physiological and psychological needs.
To provide the means whereby the associated occupational safety and health
legislations may be progressively replaced by a system of regulations and
approved industry codes of practice operating in combination with the provisions
of this Act designed to maintain or improve the standards of safety and health.
7
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
OSHA as an act defines the responsibilities of employers, manufacturer,
employees, self-employed workers, designers, importers and vendors. With the creation
of this act, it provides for the appointments of enforcement officers and the setting up of
an governmental agency called the National Council for Occupational Safety and Health.
This agency is given the powers to enforce, to inspect and the liabilities for breaking the
law. This act covers these industries:
Manufacturing
Mining and quarrying
Construction
Agriculture, forestry and fishing
Utilities (gas, electric, water and sanitary services)
Transport (storage and communication)
Wholesale and retail traders
Hotels and restaurant
Finance, insurance, real estate, business service
Public services and statutory authority
The formation of OSHA came was upon three principles. The first was the need
for employers to develop a good and orderly management system that starts with a safety
and health policy. Secondly, employers, employees and the authorities must negotiate to
settle issues and problems relating to occupational safety and health at the workplace.
The first principle is self-regulation. To handle issues relating to occupational safety and
health, employers must develop a good and orderly management system. Starting with
8
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
formation of a safety and health policy and consequently employers have to make the
proper arrangements to be carried out. The third and last principle is co-operation, where
the success of the occupational safety and health programs will succeed with the co-
operation between employers and employees. With the resulting co-operation, there will
be an increase of quality of occupational safety and health at the workplace (Laws of
Malaysia 2000).
3 Factors and failures in implementing occupational safety and health programs
Despite the regulation policies and agencies being set up to meet the challenges of
providing a safe and conducive working environment, results are still unsatisfactory. The
safety regulations provided by OSHA 1994 is very comprehensive but the level of
awareness and practicability of it are generally lower than expected over the last five (5)
years (Abdul Hamid et al 2003). Below are some of the other reasons of failures of
implementing safety and health programs at construction sites:
3.1.1 Attitude of Site Management Team
There exists a negative attitude to the safety concerns at a construction site due to
increasing costs in construction costs as well as not investment friendly. Thus, as a result,
unsafe, old and obsolete personal safety protection equipments (PPE) are provided due to
the lackadaisical attitude of the site management team.
3.1.2 Lack of Enforcement by Proper Authority
Lack of monitoring, safety audit and enforcement conducted by improper agencies
hampers the protection of occupational safety and health. A lack of serious commitment,
9
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
insufficient workforce and government budget allocations constraints can also be added
to this matter.
3.1.3 Ineffective Safety Campaign
There is a lack of coordination between the employers, employees and enforcement
agencies in promoting safety campaigns. Safety awareness campaigns are important so
that people will avoid any accident and injury at the workplace.
3.1.4 Inadequate Safety Training and Course
Most safety officers if are not properly trained and are not certified to provide and
enforce safety guidelines on the site. Agencies such as CIDB and NIOSH cater to
providing training for effective safety aspects at construction site. Once the safety
officers are certified they will be able to ensure that the organization would adhere to the
guidelines set by OSHA 1994.
3.1.5 Incompetent Safety Officer
As required by the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) 1994, companies must
appoint a safety officer. Sadly, most companies simply do not comply due to lack of
safety commitment and budget allocation by management team.
4 Steps and Measure to overcome problems of occupational safety and health
It is important to have occupational safety and health programs to ensure that
there is safety and health on the construction project. Accidents can be avoided if all
parties to the project from project inception to execution as well as the maintenance of
10
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
the facility at post completion are involved to ensure that there is safety in a project.
Designers, architects, contractors who carry out the work as well as clients should be
involved in adhering to occupational safety and health programs (Joyce 1995; Berger
1999).
In the past, health and safety at the construction work place was completely
ignored. This resulted in being the main causes during accidents at the work place. As
such an approach to the issues via a team building approach from all parties directly or
indirectly from everyone involved in design, management, and execution of construction
projects as well as post completion maintenance (Smallwood and Haupt 2000).
4.1.1 Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems (OHS-MS)
In ensuring occupational safety and health, an occupational safety and health
management system (OHS-MS) should be implemented. The objective of the OHS-MS is
to identify possible flaws and weaknesses that needs to be overcome via a process of
continual, step-wise improvement.
On a global scale, the United Nations agency, the ILO (International Labor
Organization), has developed voluntary guidelines on OHS-MS. This is to assist
governments, employers and workers in a teambuilding approach to occupational safety
and healthy workplace environment in an organization. The guideline provided for
countries are (ILO 2001):
• Be used to establish a national framework for OHS management systems, preferably
supported by national laws and regulations
11
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
• Provide guidance for the development of voluntary arrangements to strengthen
compliance with regulations and standards leading to continual improvement in OHS
performance
• Provide guidance on the development of both national and tailored guidelines on OHS
management systems to respond appropriately to the real needs of organization,
according to their size and the nature of their activities.
Under the OHS-MS, it contains the main points of policy, organizing, planning
and implementation, evaluation and action for improvement for occupational safety and
health. The OHS-MS is a reflection of the organization’s commitment to legal and
regulatory in complying with OHS requirements. Under the British standard, there are six
(6) elements of an OHS Management System (Ahmadon et al 2006). The British
standard is called the BS 8800:1996. Appendix 1 will explain the elements of
occupational safety and health.
4.1.2 OHSAS 18001: 1996 (Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series)
In avoiding confusion with the many guidelines regarding safety and health at the
workplace, OHSAS 18001: 1996 (Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series
2007) was introduced. This was developed in relations with the quality and
environmental management systems certification of ISO 9001 (Quality) and ISO 14001
(Environmental) standards. OHSAS value is that it allows the organization to control and
manage its risk in relations to occupation safety and health.
The OHSAS applications and benefits to an organization are:
12
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
• Assisting in the establishment of an OHS management system to eliminate or minimize
risk to employees and other interested parties who may be exposed to occupational safety
and health risks
• Implement, maintain and continually improve an OHS-MS.
• Providing adherence to the stated OHS policy.
• Seek certification/ registration of its OHS management system by an external
organization via audit or consulting parties
• Make a self-determination and declaration of conformance with their OHSAS
specification for an organization
In Table 2, the OHS-MS consists of six (6) elements as follows as per the OHSAS 18001:
1996 (Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series):
• General requirements
• OHS policy
• Planning
• Implementation and operation
• Checking and corrective action
• Management review
13
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
Table 2: OHS Management System elements of OHSAS 18001: 1996
4.1.3 Application of Occupational Safety and Health in different countries
Different parts of the world apply differently in applying occupational safety and
health standards. Following the basic guidelines of the OSH-MS, most counties have
similar standards that are followed. This is due to the OSH-MS being closely in line with
the quality and environmental management systems certification of ISO 9001 (Quality)
and ISO 14001 (Environmental) standards. As per the adherence to the OSH-MS, they
also closely follow according to the legal and regulatory as set by the governmental and
local authority bodies.
14
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
As per example below in Appendix 2, there are 4 types of different approaches
that most countries take to OSH-MS such as (Kogi 2002), the examples stated below
follows accordingly in Asian region:
Indonesia and Singapore
Where it is mandatory to have OSH-MS .
Australia and New Zealand, China, Thailand
OHS-MS standards is voluntary but with the support of management certification
systems
Hong Kong, Japan and Korea
National Occupational Safety and Health statutory bodies providing guidelines for
the a national OSH-MS model.
India and Malaysia
Provide encouragement for the voluntary adoption of OSH-MS without national
mandatory legal and regulatory framework
15
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
5 Conclusion
Despite the importance of the construction industry to a nation’s economy,
occupational health and safety should not be ignored. Having an efficient occupational
safety and health programs, workers would feel secure and comfortable working on the
constructions site (Khalid 1996). A safe and healthy environment at the workplace would
mean the reduction in unnecessary costs in corrective procedures by focusing on
preventive measures thereby not only increasing productivity of work but also avoiding
any injury or loss of life.
However, should organization choose to ignore any concerns, there are laws to
protect the common worker. As stated in the Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994
(Laws of Malaysia 2000), it is mandatory for all construction companies to provide a safe
and conducive working environment for their workers and subcontractors at construction
and fabrication sites. With the introduction of legislation to protect the common worker at
the construction workplace, occupational health and safety has gained an important
attention from the employers for fear of possible prosecution for non compliance. In
addition, with good safety and heath programs in the construction workplace, the
construction project stakeholders will be able to see the benefit arising from the increase
in work productivity, reduction in unnecessary costs as well as being able to meet the
project deliverables (Ahmad et al 2000).
16
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
“The most effective project managers are developed day-to-day, not year-to-year or
project mistake-to-project mistake. Mistakes will happen, even with the best of mentoring,
however, project managers with strong mentors should find their people effectiveness
continually improving. The benefit is that the company and everyone connected to the
project shares in those gains.” Neal Whitten (Whitten 1999)
17
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
6 Appendixes
Appendix 1: OHS Management System elements of the BS 8800: 1996
18
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
Appendix 2: National strategies taken for developing occupational safety and health management systems in Asian countries
19
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
7 References
1. Abdul Ghani Khalid (1996), Construction Site Injuries : The Case of Malaysia.
Faculty of Built and Environment,UTM, Skudai, Malaysia.
2. Abdul Rahim Abdul Hamid, Wan Zulkifli Wan Yusuf and Bachan Singh (2003),
Hazards at Construction Sites. Proceedings of the 5th. Asia-Pacific Structural
Engineering and Construction Conference (APSEC 2003), 26-28 August, 2003,
Johor Bahru, Malaysia.
3. Ahmadon Bakri, Rosli Mohd Zin, Mohd Saidin Misnan and Abdul Hakim (2006),
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Management Systems : Towards
Development of Safety and Health Culture. Proceedings of the 6th. Asia-Pacific
Structural Engineering and Construction Conference (APSEC 2006), 5-6
September, 2006, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
4. Ahmad, D. and Yan, Z. (1996): ‘An Overview of the Construction Industry in
China,’Proceedings of CIB International Conference, ‘Construction
Modernization and Education,’ Beijing, China, 21-24 October, CD-ROM
20
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
5. Berger, J. (1999): ‘Construction Safety Coordination in Germany,’ In
Gottfried,A., Trani, L., and Dias, L.A. (eds), Safety Coordination and Quality in
Construction, Proceedings of International Conference of CIB Working
Commission 99 and Task Group 36, Milan, Italy, 22-23 June, pp. 51-60
6. Brown, P.E. (1996): ‘Total Integration of the Safety Professional into the Project
Management Team,’ In Dias, L.M.A. and Coble, R.J. (eds.), Implementation of
Safetyand Health on Construction Sites, Proceedings of the First International
Conference of CIB Working Commission W99, Lisbon, Portugal, 4-7 September,
pp. 137-143
7. Construction Task Force (1998): Rethinking Construction--The Report of the
Construction Task Force to the Deputy Prime Minister, John Prescott, on the
Scope for Improving the Quality and Efficiency of UK Construction, London,
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
8. Center to Protect Workers’ Rights (Center to Protect Workers’ Rights) (1993): An
Agenda for Change, Report of the National Conference on Ergonomics, Safety,
and Health in Construction, Washington, D.C., 18-22 July
9. Dias, L.A. and Coble, R.J. (1999): Construction Safety Coordination in the
EuropeanUnion, CIB Publication 238, Lisbon, Portugal, CIB Working
Commission W99
21
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
10. Gee, A.F. and Saito, K. (1997): ‘Construction Loads and Other Safety Measures
Specified by U.S., U.K. and Japanese Bridge Standards,’ In Ratay, R.T.(ed.),
Construction Safety Affected by Codes and Standards, Proceedings of a session
sponsored by the Design Loads on Structures During Construction Standards
Committee and the Performance of Structures During Construction Technical
Committee of The Structural Engineering Institute, Minneapolis, 5-8 October, pp.
8-15
11. Haupt, T.C. (1996): An Economic Integration Approach to Infrastructure and
Construction Industry Development: The Case for the Southern African
Development Community (SADC), De Montfort University, Unpublished M.Phil.
thesis
12. Hinze and Harrison (1981), Safety Programs in Large Construction Firm.
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 107(3), 455-467.
13. International Labour Office (ILO) (1999): Yearbook of Labour Statistics,
International Labour Office, Geneva
14. Joyce, Raymond (1995): The Construction (Design and Management)
Regulations 1994Explained: Thomas Telford Publications : London
22
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
15. Kogi, Kazutaka. “Work Improvement and Occupational Safety and Health
Management Systems: Common Features and Research Needs.” Industrial
Health 2002, 40, 121–133
16. Laws of Malaysia (2000). Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994 (Act 514)
and Regulation and Orders, Kuala Lumpur, International Law Book Services.
17. Neal Whitten, PM Network Magazine, 1999
18. Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series - OHSAS 18001 : 2007
19. Ratay, R.T. (1997): Construction Safety Affected by Codes and Standards,
Proceedings of a session sponsored by the Design Loads on Structures During
Construction Standards Committee and the Performance of Structures During
Construction Technical Committee of The Structural Engineering Institute,
Minneapolis, 5-8 October
20. Rowlinson, S. (2000): ‘Human Factors in Construction Safety - Management
Issues,’ In Hinze, J., Coble, R., and Haupt, T. (eds), Construction Safety and
Health Management, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, pp. 59-86
23
Module 5: Occupational Safety and Environmental Parameters
21. Social Security Organization (SOCSO) 2005, Number of death cases reported
from 2000 – 2004. Retrieved from http://www.perkeso.org.my/statistik2.asp, 6
June 2007
22. Smallwood, J. and Haupt, T. (2000): ‘Safety and Health Team Building,’ In
Hinze, J., Coble, R., and Haupt, T. (eds), Construction Safety and Health
Management, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, pp. 115-144
23. Syed M. Ahmad et al (2000), Site Safety Management in Hong Kong. Journal of
Management in Engineering, December 2000, ASCE, USA.
24. The Business Roundtable (1983): More Construction for the Money, Summary
Report of the Construction Industry Cost Effectiveness Project, New York, The
Business Roundtable
.
24