implementing the university’s sustainability vision · greening of the campus vi university of...
TRANSCRIPT
Greening of the Campus VI
Greening UConn
Implementing the University’s Sustainability
Vision
Richard A. Miller Esq. Gregory Mella
Smart & Sustainable Campuses
Greening of the Campus VI
University of Connecticut
Established in 1881
Over 4,000 Acres at Main Campus in Storrs
No. 1 Public University in New England (U.S. News & World Report)
Law School in Hartford
Health Center in Farmington
Five Regional Campuses
Enrollment of 28,000
74% of students at Storrs live on-campus
UConn provides water, electricity, sewage treatment
Greening of the Campus VI
UConn 2000/21st Century UConn: Highlights1995–2005 / 2005-2015
$2.3 billion capital
improvement
program to renew,
rebuild and
enhance
130+ projects over
$2 Million
2.9 million GSF
new construction
600,000+ GSF
renovation
Applications,
enrollment,
diversity, academic
metrics all up
since ’95
Greening of the Campus VI
UConn’s Path to Sustainable Development
$2.3 billion capital improvement program reflects institutional goals for excellence
Need for improvement in environmental performance
Rural setting of main campus
Well-informed, environmentally-aware community & public officials
Environmental sustainability a focus area of New Academic Plan (2003-04)
Consistent with institutional values
Triple bottom line
Greening of the Campus VI
Environmental Policy Organization
EPAC Subcommittees & Workgroups
EcoHusky
Student Group
Biodiesel Team
Greenhouse Gas Reduction
GHG Workgroup
Water Conservation
Workgroup
Waste Paper Reduction
Workgroup
Compliance & Best Practices
C&BP Subcommittee
Landfill Eco-Demonstration
Workgroup
Integrated Pest Management
IPM Workgroup
Campus Bicycle Plan Team
ITE/EcoHusky
Green Building/Low Impact Design
Workgroup
Land Use & Sustainable Development
LUSD Subcommittee
Recycling Workgroup
Environmental Literacy
Workgroup
Outreach Subcommittee
Environmental Policy Advisory Council(EPAC)
Greening of the Campus VI
Performance: The University will institutionalize best practices and continually monitor, report on and
improve its environmental performance.
Responsible management and growth: The University will design, construct
and maintain its buildings, infrastructure and grounds in a manner that ensures environmental sustainability and protects
public health and safety.
Outreach: The University will promote environmental stewardship in Connecticut and embrace environmental
initiatives in partnership with its surrounding communities.
Academics: The University will advance understanding of the environment through its curriculum, research
and other academic programs, and will employ an ethic of environmental stewardship in all intellectual pursuits.
Conservation: The University will conserve natural resources, increase its use of environmentally
sustainable products, materials and services, including renewable resources, and prevent pollution and minimize wastes
through reduction, reuse and recycling.
Teamwork: The University will encourage teamwork and provide groups and individuals with support,
guidance and recognition for achieving shared environmental goals.
Environmental Policy Statement
Greening of the Campus VI
2004 - 2005 EPAC Initiatives
Sustainable Design Guidelines
Climate Change - GHG Reductions• Alternative Fuels
• Energy Conservation
Water Conservation
Waste Paper Reduction
Environmental Literacy
Environmental Outreach• Recycling• Res Life Awareness
Greening of the Campus VI
To LEED or not to LEED?
Pros
Solid framework
Best for new construction and larger projects
Widely recognized standards + third party verification credibility with stakeholders
Payback through reduced operating costs, increased productivity, improved health
Cons
First-cost premium forces trade-offs
Not well-suited to renovation
Not applicable to infrastructure projects
Discounts local environmental priorities
Contractors & PMs inexperienced
Inconsistent with conventional, e.g., value engineering
Some credits not feasible or desirable
Greening of the Campus VI
September 23, 2003
LEEDtm Audit
Summary of Findings
Why Assess
Learn about campus culture
Evaluate past performance
Identify relevant strategies
Prioritize local and regional environmental
issues
Understand project delivery process
The Retroactive LEED Audit (2003)
Surveyed four recent projects
• Tour each building
• Review construction drawings and
specification
• Review of building cost breakout
• Discuss with facilities staff
Standard for Audit: LEED Version 2.1
Sustainable Design Assessment
Greening of the Campus VI
Benchmarking Guidelines
Greening of the Campus VI
Technical Guideline Components
• Planning Sustainable Sites
• Safeguarding Water
• Conserving Materials and Resources
• Improving Energy Efficiency
• Enhancing Indoor Environmental Quality
SDGs Align with LEEDTechnical Guidelines
Greening of the Campus VI
Why Discuss Process?
• Technical Guidelines alone are not
sufficient
• Process Guidelines are a critical overlay
• Promote an integrated and collaborative
process
• Ensure that the resulting project is
compatible with the expectations and
culture of the University
• Consultant design team will coordinate
the sustainable design process
Process Guideline Components• Pre-Design
• Design
• Construction
• Occupancy
SDGs Document A ProcessProcess Guidelines
Greening of the Campus VI
SDGs: Benefits & Lessons Learned
Integrated sustainable design into UConn’s construction process
• Applied to all projects
• Established sustainability matrix as a tool
• Changed the paradigm
Introduced and promoted “Sustainability,” LEED and green building concepts
Engaged administrators, faculty, staff and students in dialogue
Acknowledged prior successes: Energy & Water Conservation
Made the case for feasibility
Single point of reference sustainable goals for campus development
Comprehensive overlay to existing campus design standards
Tailored the best, most relevant strategies
Provides benchmarks for comparison with peer institutions
Demonstrates commitment to environmental leadership
An evolving document = ongoing dialogue
Greening of the Campus VI
Green Building at UConnFirst LEED-Registered Athletic Facility in NCAA
SDGs in
Action:
Conserving
Materials -
Recycled
Sneakers in
Synthetic
Turf
Greening of the Campus VI
The Sustainable Design Matrix
Version 2.1 Registered Project Checklist
BURTON FOOTBALL FACILITY AND SHENKMAN TRAINING FACILITY
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT, STORRS CT. Yes ? No
Sustainable Sites 14 Points
Y Prereq 1 Erosion & Sedimentation Control Required
Credit 1 Site Selection 1
Credit 2 Urban RedevelopmentCredit 3 Brownfield RedevelopmentCredit 4.1 Alternative Transportation, Public Transportation Access 1
Credit 4.2 Alternative Transportation, Bicycle Storage & Changing Rooms 1
Credit 4.3 Alternative Transportation, Alternative Fuel Refueling Stations 1 $3,400 ESTCredit 4.4 Alternative Transportation, Parking Capacity 1
Credit 5.1 Reduced Site Disturbance , Protect or Restore Open SpaceCredit 5.2 Reduced Site Disturbance , Development Footprint 1
Credit 6.1 Stormwater Management, Rate or Quantity 1
Credit 6.2 Stormwater Management, TreatmentCredit 7.1 Landscape & Exterior Design to Reduce Heat Islands, Non-Roof 1 $5,000 ESTCredit 7.2 Landscape & Exterior Design to Reduce Heat Islands, RoofCredit 8 Light Pollution Reduction 1
Yes ? No CATEGORY TOTAL 9
Water Efficiency 5 Points
Credit 1.1 Water Efficient Landscaping, Reduce by 50%
Credit 1.2 Water Efficient Landscaping, No Potable Use or No Irrigation 1
Credit 2 Innovative Wastewater Technologies
Credit 3.1 Water Use Reduction, 20% Reduction 1
Credit 3.2 Water Use Reduction, 30% Reduction
Yes ? No CATEGORY TOTAL 2
Energy & Atmosphere 17 Points
Y Prereq 1 Fundamental Building Systems Commissioning Required $65,000 ESTY Prereq 2 Minimum Energy Performance Required
Y Prereq 3 CFC Reduction in HVAC&R Equipment Required
Credit 1.1 Optimize Energy Performance , 20% New / 10% Existing 2 $30,000 EST
Greening of the Campus VI
East Campus Master PlanConserve Open Space & Protect Resources
Legend
Preservation
Conservation
Education &
Research
Planning Sustainable Sites
Goal 1: Avoid unnecessary
environmental impacts
Strategy
Protect direct recharge
areas
Greening of the Campus VI
Safeguarding WaterStormwater “Rain Gardens”
Safeguarding Water
Goal 1: Reduce development
stormwater runoff
Strategy
Introduce rain gardens
Greening of the Campus VI
Road Project - Vernal Pool Study
Planning Sustainable Sites
Goal 1: Avoid unnecessary
environmental impacts
Strategy
Preserve habitats
Greening of the Campus VI
Landfill Remediation Project
Exploring opportunities for research,
demonstration and student projects
focusing on invasive species and
wildlife habitat
An opportunity for a trail system and
new recreational resource for UConn
community
Focus on landscaping plans and
designs for:
• Invasive species control
• Trail creation & marking
• Wetland restoration & creation
Planning Sustainable Sites
Goal 2: Minimize physical impact of
development
Strategy
Restore damaged
landscapes
Greening of the Campus VI
EPAC Compost Facility Task Force
Convened in Aug. 2005 by request of UConn President
Analyze costs/benefits of alternatives; review peer institutions; assess
potential collaboration with town
Recommendations due in January 2006
Estimated full construction cost: $800K – 1.6 Million
Potential site: Spring Manor Farm near Depot Campus
• Environmentally safe area; no crops cultivated
• Low visibility; Low site development cost
• Accessible; Convenient to Ag lands
Planning Sustainable Sites
Goal 2: Minimize physical impact of
development
Strategy
Conserve quality natural
areas
Greening of the Campus VI
Campus Bike Plan:April 2005 Support Ride
Planning Sustainable Sites
Goal 2: Encourage alternative
transportation
Strategy
Encourage bicycle use
Greening of the Campus VI
Student Involvement is Essential
Internships
EPAC Subcommittees
Class Projects
Research Projects
Events & Activities
Outreach
Greening of the Campus VI
www.ecohusky.uconn.edu