importance of protective marking (as appropriate… · protective marking (as appropriate)...

18
PROTECTIVE MARKING (as appropriate) Presentation title - edit in Header and Footer Importance of TOPSIDES in Delivering MERUK Gunther Newcombe Director Exploration & Production Topsides Conference March 2016

Upload: phungnhan

Post on 30-Jul-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

PROTECTIVE MARKING (as appropriate)

Presentation title - edit in Header and Footer

Importance of

TOPSIDES

in Delivering MERUK

Gunther Newcombe Director

Exploration & Production

Topsides Conference

March 2016

PROTECTIVE MARKING (as appropriate) Outline

• UKCS & OGA Context

• MERUK Topsides Approach

• Topsides Focus Areas

• Key Messages

Slide 1

PROTECTIVE MARKING (as appropriate) UKCS Context

Exploration Production Costs

Difficult environment with low oil price but turnaround evident

1970 2015

1.6 mmboe/day

Exploration wells Daily production Average lifting cost per barrel (£)

Notable success 2015

60% success at $6/boe

> 150 mmboe discovered

Production up by >9%

with new fields & PE

increase to nearly 70%

1964 2016

We

lls

Oil

pri

ce

($

)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

43bn barrels recovered

Up to 20bn barrels remaining

70% of UK’s total primary energy

Operating efficiency

improvements

OPEX reduction $30/boe to $16

Sustainable transformation next

Slide 2

PROTECTIVE MARKING (as appropriate)

Energy Bill in Parliament & MERUK Strategy & Corporate Plan issued

DECC

EDU

LED

Framework Document

Energy Bill 2015

OGA

Executive Agency

(Civil Service)

DECC

OGA

Independent

Authority

DECC

Evolution of the OGA

Historically

Calendar

April

2015

Calendar

Summer

2016

Calendar

About the OGA

Licence offshore oil & gas

Licence onshore oil & gas

Licence carbon storage

Industry culture

Commercial behaviour

Greater collaboration

Investment in UKCS

Value creation

Industry development

Building the OGA

Slide 3

PROTECTIVE MARKING (as appropriate)

MER UK Boards

Purpose Deliver tangible benefits in support of MER UK

Objectives • Developing strategic approach & 5 year plans

• Deliver tangible and quantifiable results

• Tripartite approach with industry, regulator & government

MER UK

Boards

Meetings with Government, Industry & Regulator 3 times per year

Slide 4

Exploration

Technology

Asset

Stewardship

Decommissioning

Regional Development

& infrastructure

Supply chain,

exports & skills

Cost &

Efficiency

Phil Kirk, Chrysaor Ray Riddoch, Nexen Paul Goodfellow, Shell John Pearson, AMECFW

Paul White, GE Colette Cohen, Centrica Neil Sims, Expro Group

Gunther Newcombe Gunther Newcombe Gunther Newcombe Stephen Marcos-Jones

Angela Seeney Angela Seeney Angela Seeney

Phil Kirk, Chrysaor Ray Riddoch, Nexen Paul Goodfellow, Shell

Topsides Focus

Frequency Quarterly Support OGA / OGUK

Industry lead Support lead

PROTECTIVE MARKING (as appropriate) OGA Asset Stewardship

OGA Monthly Performance Pack 2015 A number of key areas focus on topsides delivery

Slide 5

PROTECTIVE MARKING (as appropriate)

Mariner

Solan

Kraken

Conwy

Cygnus

Catcher Stella/

Harrier

Western

Isles

Clair Ridge

Edradour/

Glenlivet

Laggan

Tormore

Schiehallion/

Loyal

ETAP

Flyndre/

Cawdor

Cayley/ Shaw

UKCS Projects

WOS

Brownfield & Greenfield Project Delivery Sub-Optimal Slide 6

OGA Data Base

PROTECTIVE MARKING (as appropriate) Project Costs

UKCS Project Cost Management needs improvement

Slide 7

Average 27%

PROTECTIVE MARKING (as appropriate)

ecitb.org.uk 9

Efficiency

& Waste

The mind-set of Lean in

Oil & Gas Projects

Technology & Case

Studies from other

sectors.

Purpose Deliver tangible, relevant & cost effective initiatives to the Oil & Gas Industry which will help

promote, support and develop collaboration and trust in Project Delivery

Objectives 1. To encourage & guide Industry to adopt Collaborative working techniques in Projects

2. To deliver Project Management knowledge resources which support cost and delivery efficiency

3. To share knowledge and good practice in Leadership and Behavioral competence

Core areas

How to Collaborate

& Trust

Challenging

Blockers

Strategy

Collaboration

Development of a

‘Project Management

Toolkit – Principles of

Collaboration for Project

Managers’

Blockers

‘Challenge & Change’ ½

day workshops by

Leading experts and

captured as online

videos to share

Knowledge

Sharing

Continued developed of

Project Management

Microsite for online

Learning Resource with

‘Experience Exchange’

portal

Efficiency

& Waste Reduction

Knowledge

Sharing

ECITB Work Group established in 1Q 2016

Projects Collaboration

Contact Keith Scott ([email protected])

Slide 8

PROTECTIVE MARKING (as appropriate) Production Efficiency

Loss Areas

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Planned Plant Losses

Export Losses

Reservoir Losses

Well Work Losses

Planned Shutdown

Unplanned Losses

Production Efficiency

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

PE Target

Target

Unplanned losses are major cause of production loss

UKCS Production & PE

Top 20 PE Performance

Slide 9

PROTECTIVE MARKING (as appropriate)

Some great examples ….and still room for improvement

Nexen delivered a

40% improvement in

water injection rates

and 30% improvement

in productivity

Golden Eagle

• Senior leadership commitment from MDs

• Increased transparency on data and plans

• Stewardship across each lifecycle stage

Enhanced stewardship strategy

• Track and review ‘company scorecards’

• Leading and lagging performance indicators

• Increase efficiency, value and accountability

Data-driven approach

• MER UK approach upstream and midstream

• OGA enhanced oil recovery strategy

• Early planning for decommissioning

Managing late-life assets

Improved Production Efficiency

Slide 10

PROTECTIVE MARKING (as appropriate)

OGA Monthly Performance Pack 2015

Equipment Reliability

Common success factors in Nuclear Industry

Craft Ownership &

Maintenance Supervision

Proactive Engineering

& Focus on Long Term

Preventive & Predictive

Maintenance

Successful Work

Management

Operating Experience

& Benchmarking

Intolerance of

Unanticipated Equipment

Failures

Focus on Critical

Systems

Elimination of Design

Vulnerabilities

Resolution of Long

Standing or Repetitive

Equipment Problems

Contact [email protected]

Slide 11

PROTECTIVE MARKING (as appropriate)

OGA Monthly Performance Pack 2015

Wrench Time

12 hour shift breakdown

Engagement of workforce critical for improving performance

Slide 12

PROTECTIVE MARKING (as appropriate) Role of Technology

Technology application improving value

Small Pool Development

Asset Integrity

Well Construction

Decommissioning

Technology Leadership Board

Key Themes

Asset Integrity Management

Non-Intrusive

Inspection

Corrosion Under

Insulation

Slide 13

PROTECTIVE MARKING (as appropriate) Inspection & CUI

Innovative approach to inspections & CUI will improve efficiency

• Major contributor to production downtime

• Often involves personnel entry into confined

spaces

• Systems should be depressurised, isolated

and gas-freed before maintenance work is

carried out

• Hazardous and costly process which leads

to minimising the frequency of inspections

Vessel Inspections Corrosion Under Insulation

• CUI is responsible for up to 60% of pipe leaks in

resulting in huge value loss

• Asset Integrity is a key ingredient to Maximising

Economic Recovery (Sir Ian Wood, Final Report

2014)

• UK onshore & offshore process plant

infrastructure is a vital asset for maintaining

economic production

Slide 14

PROTECTIVE MARKING (as appropriate) Technology Screening

Technology opportunities include transfer from other industries

Sniffer Dogs Acoustic Emission

Ultrasonics Pulsed Eddy

Current

Guided Wave

Ultrasonic Radiography

A wide range of techniques and maturity

Slide 15

PROTECTIVE MARKING (as appropriate)

OGA Monthly Performance Pack 2015

Decommissioning

Conventional Lift

Good planning & regional approach can offer significant savings

Slide 16

Piece Small

Topsides Decommissioning

-

10

20

30

40

50

-

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

201

5

201

7

201

9

202

1

202

3

202

5

202

7

202

9

203

1

203

3

203

5

203

7

203

9

204

1

204

3

204

5

204

7

204

9

Annual

Spend

(£bn)

Cumulative

Spend

(£bn)

Project Management Facility Running Costs Make Safe

Preparation

Removal

Onshore Disposal

37%

Wells, pipelines & substructures

63%

£47bn

PROTECTIVE MARKING (as appropriate)

• OGA working closely with Industry & Government

to deliver MERUK

OGA Monthly Performance Pack 2015

Key Messages

Focus will make a difference

Slide 17

• Delivering efficient topside performance is critical

• Focus on all aspects of topsides from design,

efficient operations to decommissioning

• Challenge on industry to share more best

practices & verify improvements