important (3.2)hazop
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
1/41
Introductionto
HAZOP Study
Dr. AAProcess Control and Safety Group
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
2/41
2
A scenario
You and your family are on a road trip by using a carin the middle of the night. You were replying a textmessage while driving at 100 km/h and it was rainingheavily. The car hits a deep hole and one of your tire
blows.
You hit the brake, but due to slippery road and yourcar tire thread was thin, the car skidded and wasthrown off the road.
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
3/41
3
Points to ponder
What is the cause of the accident?
What is the consequence of the event?
What can we do to prevent all those things to happen?
What other possible accidents might happen on the road trip?
Can we be prepared before the accident occurs?
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
4/41
4
Can we make it more systematic?
Parameter Guideword Possible
Causes
Consequences Action Safeguard
Car speed Too fastToo slow
Rushing Skidded whenemergency brake
- Slow down- Speed up
-ABS brakesystem
-Safety belt
- Air bag
Tire No thread
Less thread
Tire too old,
often speeding
and emergency
break
Car skidded - Check frequently
- Have spare tire
Window
visibility
Low
Very low
Rain Cannot see the
road
Car light Dim
No light
-Stop car
-Go to nearest
garage
-Use emergency
signal
Road With holes
Rocky
Breaks the car
tire
- Put a signboard
-Street lights
Travel time Night
Foggy
No street light -Travel during
daylight
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
5/41
Flash Drum Example
Consider the following Flash drum system. The purpose is to
separate multiple mixture of mostly A and B plus some otherheavy components to produce main product leaving the top at
75 mol % of A. Steam at 5 bar is used to bring the temperature
at the desired saturation temperature of 91 oC. The column
nominal operating pressure is 1 atm.
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
6/41
6
FCV7
FCV
2
FCV
5
TI
4
FI
1
TI1
FI
6
FI
2
TI3
TI
2
TI
8
FI
8
FI
9FCV
9
FCV
8
Process Fluid Steam
V-40
E-30E-20
XAD= mol %
T9= 90oC
XAF=
50 mol %
T1=60 oC
Flash Drum Example
T4= 90oC
T4= 100oC
T7= 91oC
T8= 90oC
T3= 80oC
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
7/41
Problem 1 Safety through automation
Consider the Flash Drum Plant. Proposethe required component of safety
through automation to provide safety
and operability.
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
8/41
8
FCV
5
FCV
2
FCV
7
TI
4
TI
3
FI
1
TI
1
FI
6
FI2
TI
3
TI
2
TI
8
FI
8
LIC
8
FI
9
FCV
9
FCV
8
PIC
9
Process Fluid Steam
V-40
E-30
E-20
XAD= 90 mol %
XAF=
50 mol % TIC
7
Flash Drum Example
Is this good enough?
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
9/41
Problem 2 - HAZOP
Consider the Flash Drum as the HAZOP Study Node, conduct HAZOP
FCV
5
FCV
2
FCV
7
TI
4
TI
3
FI
1
TI
1
FI
6
FI2
TI
3
TI
2
TI
8
FI
8
LIC
8
FI
9FCV
9
FCV
8
PIC
9
Process Fluid Steam
V-40
E-30
E-20
XAD= 90 mol %
XAF=
50 mol % TIC
7
Study node
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
10/41
10
HAZOP Terminology 1 Node
A node is the specific location in the process in
which (the deviations of) the process intention areevaluated.
Examples might be: separators, heat exchangers,
scrubbers, pumps, compressors, and interconnecting
pipes with equipment Flash Drum Example
Separator as a node
Other nodes: process to process heat exchanger, utility
heat exchanger Alternatively, each process line can be taken as a node.
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
11/41
Terminology 2 Design Intent
11
Description of how the process is expected to
behave at the Study Node.
This is qualitatively described as an activity (e.g.,
feed, reaction, sedimentation) and/or quantitatively
in the process parameters, like temperature, flow
rate, pressure, composition, etc.
Flash Drum Example:
To separate light components from the heavies (or to collectlight component at the top product stream)
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
12/41
12
Terminology 3 - HAZOP Log Sheet
Deviation Causes Consequences Protection ActionGuideword +
Parameter
Guideword: No,
Less, More,
reverse etc
Parameter: Flow,
temperature,
level etc
Possible causes
of the deviation
Effect of deviation
of plant safety and
operability
Safety
provision
already
considered.
- Prevent
causes
- prevent/reduce
consequence
- monitor/
detect
Is the protection
sufficient?
If not, propose
suitable action
or
recommendation
Based on the selected NODE and the design intent
of the node, HAZOP study is conducted. Theoutput is summarised in HAZOP Log Sheet
Example: Simplified HAZOP Log Sheet
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
13/41
Terminology 4 Deviation
13
Deviation is a way in which the process conditions
may depart from their INTENTION / DESIGN
INTENT
Expressed by combining parameters such as FLOW with
Guideword such as MORE to indicate MORE FLOW
meaning the flow is more than the design intent. Expresses as other unwanted condition such as
Contamination or corrosion.
Parameters: any process parameters such as Flow,
temperature, pressure, pH etc Guideword: NO, MORE, LESS, AS WELL AS, PART
OF, OTHER THAN, REVERSE, etc.
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
14/41
The suggested guide words
No: negation of design intention; no part of design
intention is achieved but nothing else happens More: Quantitative increase
Less: Quantitative decrease
As well as: Qualitative increase where all design intention
is achieved plus additional activity
Part of: Qualitative decrease where only part of the
design intention is achieved
Reverse: logical opposite of the intention
Other than: complete substitution, where no part of the
original intention is achieved but something quitedifferent happens
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
15/41
When timing matters
Add the following guide words:
Early: something happens earlier in time than intended Late: something happens later in time than intended
Before: something happens earlier in a sequence thanintended
After: something happens later in a sequence thanintended
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
16/41
Terminology 5 Causes
16
The reason(s) why the DEVIATION could occur
More CAUSES can be identified for one
DEVIATION.
Flash Drum Example Causes for LESS LEVEL in V-40
FCV8 stuck open
LESS inlet Flow
MORE Flow in line 8
etcFCV
7
LIC
8
FCV
9
FCV8
PIC
9
Steam
V-40E-30
TIC
7
P8
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
17/41
Terminology 6 Consequences
17
The results of the DEVIATION, in case it occurs. CONSEQUENCES may
both comprise process hazards and operability problems, like plantshutdown.
More CONSEQUENCES can follow from one cause and, in turn, one
CONSEQUENCE can have several CAUSES
Consequence for LESS LEVEL in V40 V-40 empty, leading to pump P8 running dry
No separation
FCV
7
LIC
8
FCV9
FCV8
PIC
9
Steam
V-40E-30
TIC
7
P8
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
18/41
Terminology 7 Protection
Sometimes termed as Safeguard, or Existing Provision
These are facilities that help to reduce the occurrencefrequency of the DEVIATION or to mitigate its
CONSEQUENCES.
There are, in principle, five types of SAFEGUARDS:
Facilities that identify the DEVIATION. eg. alarm instrumentation and
human operator detection.
Facilities that compensate the DEVIATION, e.g., an automatic control
system
Facilities that prevent the DEVIATION to occur. e.g. an inert blanket gas
in storages of flammable substances.
Facilities that prevent a further escalation of the DEVIATION, e.g., by(total) trip of the activity (SIS facility)
Facilities that relieve the process from the hazardous DEVIATION.
These comprise for instance: pressure safety valves (PSV) and vent
systems. 18
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
19/41
Terminology 7- Protection
Flash Drum Example
Protection against LESS LEVEL
in V40
LIC8 controlling the liquid level
Is it enough???
19
FCV
7
LIC
8
FCV
9
FCV8
PIC
9
Steam
V-40
E-30
TIC
7
P8
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
20/41
Terminology 8 Action/Recommendation
Where a credible cause results in a negative consequence,
it must be decided whether some action should be taken. It is at this stage that consequences and associated
safeguards are considered. If it is deemed that the
protective measures are adequate, then no action need be
taken, and words to that effect are recorded in the Action
column.
Actions fall into two groups:
Actions that remove the cause.
Actions that mitigate or eliminate the consequences.
20
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
21/41
Terminology 8 Action
21
Existing Protection for LESS
LEVEL is considered notadequate.
Actions Proposed
Add Low level Alarm (LAL
and LALL) Add SIS to stop pump P8
when LALL triggered.
FCV
7
LIC
8
FCV
9
FCV8
PIC
9
Steam
V-40
E-30
TIC
7
P8
T i l 9 C t
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
22/41
Terminology 9 Comments
22
Various additional columns can be added to the
HAZOP Log Sheet.
Comments
Any remarks to be given to the
ACTIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS or which, in another
way, showed up during the HAZOP sessions.
Action Party is also typically identified and noted
in the HAZOP Sheet.
Fl h D L L l
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
23/41
23
Flash Drum: Less Level
Deviation Causes Consequences Protection Action
Less Level
(Low Level)
Valve FCV8 stuck
openLess feed
LIC8 malfunction
Level drop
leading to dryseparator, hence
no separation
Risk of pump
running dry
(damage)
LIC8 Install LAL
Install LALLwith SIS to stop
pump P8
Note:
Sometimes, more than one consequences may arise and for each
consequence, different actions are required
Sometimes different causes require different actions
Flash Drum Example
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
24/41
24
FCV
7
FCV
2
FCV
5
TI
4
TI
3
FI
1
TI
1
FI
6
FI
2
TI
3
TI
2
TI
8
FI
8
LIC
8
FI
9FCV
9
FCV
8
PIC
9
Process Fluid Steam
V-40
E-30
E-20
XAD= 90 mol %
XAF=50 mol % TIC
7
Flash Drum Example
Now, consider MORE PRESSURE as deviation
Fl h D MORE PRESSURE
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
25/41
25
Flash Drum: MORE PRESSURE
Deviation Causes Consequences Protection Action
More Pressure
(High Pressure)
Valve FCV9 stuck
Close
PIC Malfunction
increase in
pressure leading to
risk of explosion
PIC8 Install PAH
Install Pressure
relieve valve
More
temperature inFeed
TIC7
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
26/41
HAZOP STUDY TEAM
HAZOP T
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
27/41
HAZOP Team
27
HAZOPLeader
HAZOPSecretary
CORE TeamProject Process Engineer
Independent Process
Engineer
Project Instrument
EngineerOperation Representative
(covering maintenance)
Specialists(as required)
Maintenance Engineer
Corrosion Engineer
Pipeline Engineer
Others
R ibilit f HAZOP T M b
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
28/41
28
HAZOP leader - The leader should be independent (i.e. has no
responsibility for the process and/or the performance of operations)
Responsibility of HAZOP Team Members
Plan sessions and timetable
Agree on the nodes, study approach etc
Be thorough
Manage the HAZOP Team Control and limit discussion when necessary
Encourage team to actively participate, be creative, draw conclusion
Keep team in focus. If conflict arises, handle with care.
Do not let anybody (including the leader himself to dominate).
Judge importance issues
Stop the team trying to redesign the process.
Leader must be strong, yet diplomatic.
Responsibility of Team Members
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
29/41
29
Responsibility of Team Members
HAZOP Secretary
Take adequate notes and record documentations
Inform leader if more time required in taking notes
Produce draft report of study
Team Members
Provide inputs based on the discipline that they
represent e.g., instrumentation, process, operation etc.
Questioning Techniques
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
30/41
30
Questioning Techniques
Open questions
Help person being asked to think use words how,what and why.
Closed questions
To focus on an issue or problem. Start with words
who, when, where.
Required answer yes or no only.
Question mix
Mix between open and closed questions.
Questioning Techniques
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
31/41
31
Things to avoid
Ambiguous or vague questions.
Double barelled/multiple questions.
Long complicated questions.
Interrogation type of questions.
A loaded questions implied judgement.
Questioning Techniques
Required information
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
32/41
32
Required information
P & IDs
Process flow diagrams Heat and Material Balances
Layouts
Logic Diagrams
Equipment Data Sheets
Material Hazard Data Sheets
Hazardous area Layouts
Modes of operation to consider
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
33/41
33
Modes of operation to consider
The following modes of plant operation should be
considered for each node: Normal operation
Reduced throughput operation
Routine start-up
Routine shut-down
Emergency shutdown
Commissioning
Special operating modes
HAZOP meeting
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
34/41
34
HAZOP meeting
Proposed agenda:
Introduction & presentation of participation
Overall presentation of the system/operation to beanalyzed
Description of the HAZOP approach
Presentation of the first node or logical part of theoperation
Analyze the first node/ part using the guide-words andparameters
Continue presentation and analysis (steps 4 & 5)
Coarse summary of findings
Focus should be on potential hazards as well as potentialoperational problems.
Sequence for conducting a HAZOP Study
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
35/41
35
Does any other guideword combine with this parameter to give a meaningful deviation?
Specify the section or stage to be examined
Describe & discuss the step/ operation; determine the design envelope.
Develop & record the design intention
From the description and the design intention select a parameter
Combine this parameter with a guideword to develop a meaningful deviation
Seek a possible cause of the deviation and identify the consequences
Evaluate the safeguards and decide if they are adequate of if a change
or further study is needed.
Have all causes of this deviation been considered?
YES
Are there further parameters to consider?
Examination of the steps/ stage is complete
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
PHASE 2: SELECT A LINE
Record
Divide section into Study nodePHASE 1: DIVIDE SECTION
PHASE 3:
ANALYSIS
PHASE 4: RECORDING
PHASE 5: REEVALUATE
Flow diagram for the HAZOP analysis The parameter-first approach
How to be a good HAZOP participant
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
36/41
36
How to be a good HAZOP participant
Be active! Everyone contribution is important
Be to the point. Avoid endless discussion ofdetails
Be critical in a positive way not negative, butconstructive
Be responsible. He who knows should let theother know
HAZOP recording
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
37/41
37
HAZOP recording
The findings are recorded during the meeting(s) using aHAZOP work-sheet, either by filling in paper copies, or by
using a computer connected to a projector(recommended).
The HAZOP worksheet may be different depending on thescope of the study generally the following entries(columns) are included Ref. no.
Guidewords
Deviations
Possible causes
Consequences
Safeguards Actions required (or, recommendations)
Actions allocated to (follow up responsibility)
Process HAZOP worksheet
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
38/41
38
Process HAZOP worksheet
Hazards and Operability Review
Project Name: Date: Page of
Process :Section: Ref.
Drawing:
Item Study
node
Process
Parameter
Deviations
(guide words)
Possible
causes
Possible
consequences
Action
Required
HAZOP Worksheet
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
39/41
HAZOP Worksheet
Plant Secretary:
Drawings referred to Team Names:
Equipment Properties: Flow Pressure Temperature
Equipment Tag Numbers Guide Words: No More Less Opposite Also
Other (Early Late)
Special conditions for Hazop:
none, start-up, abnormal operation, maintenance, other (details):
Line
no.
Deviation Cause Consequences Safeguard Action
39
Flash Drum Example
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
40/41
40
FCV
5
FCV
2
FCV
7
TI
4
TI
3
FI
1
TI
1
FI
6
FI
2
TI
3
TI
2
TI
8
FI
8
LIC
8
FI
9FCV
9
FCV
8
PIC
9
Process Fluid Steam
V-40
E-30
E-20
XAD= 90 mol %
XAF=50 mol % TIC
7
Now, complete the HAZOP Study
Some References
-
7/28/2019 Important (3.2)Hazop
41/41
41
Some References
Frank P. Lees (1980). Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.
Hazard Identification, Assessment and Control. Volume 1. Butterworth
& Co (Publishers) Ltd.
Frank P. Lees (1980). Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.
Hazard Identification, Assessment and Control. Volume 2. Butterworth
& Co (Publishers) Ltd.
Frank Crawley, Malcolm Preston & Brian Tyler (2000). HAZOP: Guide tobest practice. Guidelines to best practice for the process and chemical
industries. Institution of Chemical Engineers, UK.
Risk Management Group (1992). Hazard & Operability Studies. Basic
2-day Training Course Notes. ICI Australia Engineering Pty Ltd.
Marvin Rausand (2004). HAZOP. Hazard and Operability Study.Department of Production and Quality Engineering, Norwegian
University of Science and Technology.