improving capacity cost effectively in africa
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
This document is offered compliments of BSP Media Group. www.bspmediagroup.com
All rights reserved.
Improving Capacity Cost Effectively in Africa
Omar Trujillo VP Africa & LATAM
Africa Com, 2013
In industry with new challenges to meet
2
Average use per user/month
3 MB
X 120
X 73
X 524
Fivefold increase in traffic by 2017
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Pe
nta
byt
es
Middle East & Africa
Source: Cisco VN Forecast 2012-2017; IDC
3G device shipments in Emerging Markets
3
Source IDC: WW Smartphone Market Forecast, Shipments by Geographic Region, 2013-2017
1,200 m
1,000 m
800 m
600 m
400 m
200 m
0 m
2010 Actual
2011 Actual
2012 Actual
2013 Forecast
2014 Forecast
2015 Forecast
2016 Forecast
2017 Forecast
Emerging Markets Developed Markets
Throughput vs. Availability vs. Price
4
Source: Unstrung Insider
Cost
Traffic
Data centric
Voice centric Revenue
We all agree: New networks need lower latency (LTE)
5
“…of course you have higher speed as well”
“The most important [thing] is the latency”
Source: Hans Vestberg, Ericsson CEO, CNBC 24/09/2013
Mobile Networks demand Lower Latency
6
GPRS Rel’97
EDGE Rel’99
EDGE Rel’4
WCDMA Rel’99
Evolved EDGE
HSDPA HSPA LTE
Mill
isec
on
ds
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
Mobile Technologies Satellite Technologies
GEO O3b
Until now, satellite backhaul technology evolution has not matched the increasing performance needs of mobile networks
Source: Rysavy Research
Trading Desk
Medical imaging
Proximity Fastest wins”
>0.1ms
Private Cloud
Web 2.0
Video
Transactions
Virtual desktop
Real-Time “Instantaneous”
Online gaming
>150ms
Mobile broadband
Finance ERP
HR CRM
Web/http Collaboration
Priority “Small delay acceptable”
Voice
400-200ms
Public Cloud
What are we trying to adapt to?
7
Latency Sensitivity
Bu
sin
ess
Cri
tica
lity
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nti
nu
ity
Best effort “No real-time requirement”
Transmission Latency >1s
Main Frame
Analytics
Document management
Procurement
Backup/recovery
Archives
WEB: Faster Response Times
Page Rendering MEO vs GEO accelerated link
8
VOICE
Lower Latency = Superior Voice Quality
• As the ITU model shows, when there is a one way latency greater than 200ms, user satisfaction drops dramatically.
• The long delay of GEO satellites is associated with poor voice quality and dissatisfied customers.
• O3b’s much lower latency dramatically improves voice quality compared to GEO satellites.
9
O3b GEO
ITU G.114 Voice Quality Model
Rural Access 5-20Mbps
Per Site
Individual Cells
Semi Rural Access 10-100 Mbps
Per Site
Small Clusters of Cells Connected via Microwave
Urban 155Mbps+
Aggregation High Site Connectivity
O3b products
Solutions
10
10 Steerable Beams per Satellite Supporting multiple backhaul scenarios.
O3b products
Next Generation Backhaul (3G)
Project
• Objective – Increase broadband penetration into rural/remote Malaysia
• Benefit – Achieve National Broadband Initiative (NBI) Objective
Solution
• O3b capacity combined with micro wave aggregation
• Shared site infrastructure & RAN (node B) among operators
11
More than 100,000 people are getting connected with the help of O3b
Connecting 111 villages with 3G services
Monrovia
Kinshasa
Juba
Mogadishu
Antananarivo
O3b products
International capacity to the continent
12
Scalable capacity between 100 Mbps - 1.2 Gbps
Fundamentals behind our approach
Unlimited Spectrum Scalable
Satellite Level Redundancy
Match fiber for QoE
Manufacturing Synergies Lower cost
13
O3b’s Latest Developments
14