improving diagnostic safety · improving diagnostic safety: the next grand challenge &...
TRANSCRIPT
IMPROVING DIAGNOSTIC SAFETY: THE NEXT GRAND CHALLENGE & OPPORTUNITY FOR INFORMATICS
HARDEEP SINGH, MD, MPHHOUSTON VA CENTER FOR INNOVATIONS IN QUALITY,
EFFECTIVENESS & SAFETY
MICHAEL E. DEBAKEY VA MEDICAL CENTER
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
Twitter: @HardeepSinghMD
2
Medical Informatics
Dean ShailajaTraberDaniel Ashley Roosan
Viraj JanetEliseViral Jessica DanielDonna
Physician/Health IT
Social Work/ Qualitative Research
Psychologist/Analyst
Medical Informatics
Sociologist/ Qualitative Research
Human Factors
Physician/Health IT
Physician/Health IT
Project Coordinator
ResearchCoordinator
Project Coordinator
ResearchCoordinator
Multidisciplinary Team• Reducing diagnostic errors• Improving health IT-
related patient safety
3
4
5
IOM Definition of Diagnostic Error7
The failure to
a) establish an accurate and timely
explanation of the patient’s health
problem(s) or
b) communicate that explanation to the
patient
8
GOAL 1 Facilitate more effective teamwork in the
diagnostic process among health care
professionals, patients, and their families
GOAL 3 Ensure that health information
technologies support patients and health
care professionals in the diagnostic process
GOAL 4 Develop and deploy approaches to
identify, learn from, and reduce diagnostic
errors and near misses in clinical practice
3 of 8 IOM Goals Relevant for Informatics
9
Our Research Shows Emerging Risks
Common diseases missed despite clear
red flags (1 in 20 US adults annually)
Failure to elicit or act on key history/exam
finding
Time
Do templates constrain thinking?
Singh et al JAMA IM 2013; Singh et al JCO 2012
10
The Famous Ebola Misdiagnosis
Temperature of 103℉ but “no fever”
Travel history in nurse’s EHR notes not seen by the doc
Day 1-Blame Nurse
Day 2-Blame EHR
Day 3-None of the
above
Few lessons learned
Upadhyay D, et al. Diagnosis 2014
11
Emerging Risks - #2
Disappearing differential diagnosis
Docs often don’t seek help when they most need it
Implications for decision support (computer or human)
12
Singh et al JAMA IM 2013; Meyer et al JAMA Intern Med 2013
Diagnostic Accuracy and Confidence
118 Physicians assessed 4 clinical
vignettes (2 easy & 2 difficult) based on
real-world cases
Goals
Assess how diagnostic accuracy is aligned
with perception of confidence in that
accuracy
Meyer et al JAMA Intern Med 2013
13
14
Diagnostic Accuracy vs. Confidence
Emerging Risks - #315
Data display and comprehension
16
Patient Perspectives-Portal Usability17
“When I log in, I can
see the new labs. But
once I’ve viewed them
already, it moves them
to somewhere else. I
couldn’t figure out
where to go to find
them. Not user
friendly.”
“The lab results are
not organized in any
logical order…like
by date. I have
trouble finding the
newest result. And
the graphs. They
are just wrong.”
Giardina et al J of Pt Exp 2015
18
Emerging Risks # 4
Overlooking documented critical information in EHR
Communication breakdowns persist despite EHRs
19
Communication of Test Results20
Evaluation of 1,163 outpatient abnormal lab &
1,196 abnormal imaging test result alerts
7% abnormal labs lacked timely follow-up
8% abnormal imaging lacked timely follow-up
Why abnormal test results continue to get
missed in health IT-based settings
Singh et al Am J Med 2010 & Singh et al Archives of Int Med 2009
Ambiguous Responsibility a Huge Issue
21
22
And More Digital Data Is on the Way
23
Wearables Smartphone
“Patients can now continuously monitor their
data real-time and send it to their docs”
How can Health IT Support Diagnosis?
24
Health IT must be safe
Health IT must be used safely
We must use health IT to improve
diagnostic safety
Leveraging health IT to identify delayed,
wrong or incorrect diagnosis before patient
harm
Sittig & Singh N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 8;367(19):1854-60
Singh Sittig BMJ Qual Saf. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-00448625
Big Data Safety Net
EHR-based triggers that look for follow-up actions
on clues (or red flags) to detect delays
prospectively
Basic versions:
+ hemoccult or microcytic anemia with no subsequent
colonoscopy in 60 days
suspicious chest-x ray with no follow-up CT scan in 30
days
Murphy, Singh et al BMJQS 2013; Radiology 2015; Chest 2016
26
27
Must Evaluate How We Are Doing
ONC-sponsored “Safety Assurance Factors for EHR Resilience (SAFER)” Guides
Proactive risk assessment and guidance
“1st draft” of best practices and knowledge
Self-assessment; not meant to be regulatory
Focused on high-risk areas including Test results & Communication
Nine guides—all freely available
Singh et al BMC Med Inf 2013
28
http://www.healthit.gov/safer
Opportunities for Patient Engagement 30
Need Novel Ways to Help Patients31
“The result was abnormal but I
didn’t realize it. There’s a
comment section but the doctor
never leaves a comment. My
triglycerides are high. Ok,
what does that mean? What
am I supposed to do?”
“I’m not a doctor. I hope
they’ll call if it’s problematic.”
“I had to figure out
the sodium was low.
There’s a problem
with low sodium,
what can I do?”
Giardina et al J of Pt Exp 2015
Health IT Innovations to Support Diagnosis
Dimension Examples
Software Better health IT tools/functions
Content Smarter alerts & diagnostic decision
support
Usability Better user-interfaces; ↑ signal to noise
ratio
32
Need More Than Just Health IT
Dimension Examples
Workflow Time interacting with patients
People Culture change
Organization Policies for closed-loop test results
follow-up
External rules National entity for shared learning
Evaluation &
Measurement
Data to separate reality vs. hype;
Triggers & ONC SAFER Guides
33
Improving Diagnosis Needs a Socio-Technical Approach
34
Sittig Singh QSHC 2010
Thank you and Acknowledgements
Funding Agencies: Department of Veterans Affairs
National Institute of Health
Agency for Health Care Research & Quality
ONC for SAFER Guides
Multidisciplinary team at VA Health Services Research Center for Innovation
Email: [email protected]
Web: http://www.houston.hsrd.research.va.gov/bios/singh.asp
Twitter: @HardeepSinghMD
35