improving educational outcomes in somerset dave farrow head of improving outcomes commissioning
TRANSCRIPT
Improving Educational Outcomes in Somerset
Dave FarrowHead of Improving Outcomes
Commissioning
• The LA is the champion of children and families (2010 White Paper)
• Monitoring Challenge Support Intervention (MCSI) framework still applies (Revised guidance Jan 2015)
• LA retains statutory duty “to promote high standards so that children and young people achieve well and fulfil their potential” (1996 Education Act)
• Ofsted expectations of LAs
The LA’s role in the Changed Landscape
LA School Improvement Inspection
• The effectiveness of corporate and strategic leadership of school improvement
• The clarity of transparency of policy and strategy for supporting school improvement and how clearly the LA has defined its monitoring, challenge, support and intervention roles
• The extent to which the LA knows schools and, where appropriate, other providers, their performance and the standards they achieve and how effectively support is focused on areas of greatest need
• The effectiveness of the LA’s identification of, and intervention in, underperforming maintained schools, including where applicable, the use of formal powers available to the LA
LA School Improvement Inspection• The impact of LA support and challenge over time and the
rate at which schools and other providers are improving, including impact of the LA strategy to narrow attainments gaps
• The extent to which the LA brokers and/or commissions high quality support for maintained schools
• The effectiveness of strategies to support highly effective leadership and management in maintained schools and other providers
• Support and challenge for school governance• The way the LA uses any available funding to effect
improvement, including how it is focused on areas of greatest need
The Next Five Years
• 30 hours free childcare for 3 and 4 year olds
• Free meals to all infants• £7b for increasing the number of good
school places• Protect funding for schools (not increase)• Continue Pupil Premium at current rates• Fairer School Funding – current levels will
be the baseline
The Next Five Years
• New standards for literacy and numeracy• If standards not met in primary schools
resit at start of secondary• Require secondary school pupils to take
GCSEs in Eng, maths, science, a language and history or geography
The Next FiveYears
• Good primary school place for every child (zero tolerance of failure)
• Expand NLE programme to take control of failing primary schools
• Every ‘failing an coasting’ secondary school to become an academy
• Expand academies/free schools etc• Force coasting schools to accept new
leadership• RI schools to convert to academies
The LA Role Going Forward• Taking the lead role in facilitating/bringing about
change• Ensuring high educational standards are secured in
all schools• Ensuring the availability of a good or outstanding
school place for every child• Safeguarding the more vulnerable including
through closing the ‘achievement gap’• Championing all Somerset children and families• Convening partnerships that will most benefit
Somerset’s children and families, and• Commissioning high quality services
What Next?
• Develop commissioning function
• Develop and Publish Improving Outcomes Strategy– Priorities– Schools Led System– Accountability/monitoring systems– Schools Causing Concern Policy
Improving Outcomes Strategy• All schools Good or Outstanding by (2018?)• Improved ‘school readiness’• On-going improvement in outcomes in all phases• Narrowing the gap for vulnerable groups (Pupil
Premium / CLA / SEN / EAL)• Improving outcomes for the most able• Addressing rurality issues• Building the capacity/capability of effective school to
school support (RAPs / NLE /LLEs / Teaching Schools etc)
• Developing effective monitoring / accountability systems• Making best use of available resources
Support and Intervention
Schools where performance is a concern
Continuum of School Improvement and Intervention
Good or Outstanding with no or few risk factors identified
Schools with short term risk factors
Schools with significant risk
factors, eg: RI/at risk of
RI/Inadequate
Schools consistently below the floor standardsSchools judged as
RI
Central Monitoring
Support/InterventionBrokered by SSE NLE, LLE SLE etc Focused/
Intensive/ Short Term
IEB Academy
conversion
UniversalPhase RAPSGroupings of schoolsIndividual School to SchoolOngoingInformal/formal
Schools Causing Concern
This could include schools:
• Likely to be judged as Inadequate if inspected by Ofsted
• Judged by Ofsted as ‘Requires Improvement’ (RI) or and not making rapid improvement
• Likely to be judged by Ofsted as ‘Requires Improvement’ and not making rapid improvement
• Below or close to floor standards over time and not making rapid improvement
• Consistently below floor standards
Schools Causing Concern
This could include schools:
• With a decline in performance over time
• Where performance is significantly below standards of comparable schools
• Where there are serious financial concerns which are not being addressed appropriately
• Which have been causing concern and are showing early signs of improvement
Schools Causing Concern
This could include schools:
• With complex weaknesses
• Requiring significant improvement with limited capacity to improve
• Where there are other serious concerns which will affect outcomes for children
Process• School (and where appropriate Academy sponsor)
notified it is causing concern • Support package and Improvement Plan agreed/
brokered with performance measures/ milestones• Progress monitored through SSE• Insufficient progress – warning notice issued• Continued insufficient progress
– for maintained schools, intervention procedures
– for Academies notification to RSC / DfE