improving the assessment of risks from dietary exposures by modeling variation and uncertainty in...

1
S240 Abstracts / Toxicology Letters 189S (2009) S57–S273 H11 Advanced international training courses in health risk assess- ment Johanna Zilliacus 1,, Annika Hanberg 2 , Helen Håkansson 2 1 Karolinska Institutet, Biosciences and Nutrition, Huddinge, Sweden, 2 Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden Implementation of reliable and efficient risk assessment proce- dures for the exposure to various types of chemicals is of high concern in Europe today. To meet these needs and interests there is an increasing need for well-educated experts in risk assessment procedures. The EU-funded projects CASCADE and RA-COURSES have devel- oped and offer a coherent European course programme in health risk assessment that includes 1-week-long courses. The courses, which are given as independent modules, are open for MSc, PhD and post doc students, senior scientists and other professionals. The courses are organised by a network of European universities. Eleven courses have been given in the programme during 2005–2009. Some of the courses are basic courses on principles in health risk assessment including methodologies and theoreti- cal approaches and some are specialized courses on for example quantitative analysis of toxicological effect data and state-of-the art understanding of the special difficulties involved with hazard and exposure assessment due to early life-stage exposure to chem- icals and other toxic agents. The courses are highly over subscribed with more than 3 applicants for each course place. The course par- ticipants come from all over Europe. The courses have received excellent evaluations from the participants. Based on the experience from the CASCADE/RA-COURSES train- ing programme as well as experience from education in toxicology at several other universities DG SANCO at the European Com- mission is now discussing a future permanent training in risk assessment resulting in a certification system for European risk assessors. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.06.453 H12 Improving the assessment of risks from dietary exposures by modeling variation and uncertainty in exposure and dose response using linked exposure and PBPK/PD models Paul Price 1,, Karl Schnelle 2 , Torka Poet 3 , Paul Hinderliter 3 1 Dow Europe GmbH, EH&S/TERC, Horgen, United States, 2 Dow AgroSciences, GLOBAL AG MATH MODELING, INDIANAPOLIS, United States, 3 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Biological Monitoring and Modeling, Richland, United States Dietary risk assessments are typically conducted based on the ratio of exposure to a No-Observed Adverse Effect Level in test ani- mals and require the use of assessment or uncertainty factors to address interspecies extrapolation and human variation. An alter- native approach is to use physiologically based, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) models coupled with models of variation in human physiology and longitudinal models of dietary exposures. A case study in the use of such models is presented for chlorpyrifos, a model compound exhibiting extensive low-dose first pass metabolism by gut, liver, and blood. Publicly available dietary residue data and publicly available dietary software mod- els are used to estimate longitudinal exposures for 1000 adults and 1000 children for the years 2002–2007. The combined model directly predicts the interindividual variation in exposure, intesti- nal and hepatic bioactivation and detoxification, circulating blood levels, and pharmacodynamic endpoints based on body mass index. The results of the analysis for chlorpyrifos confirmed that current dietary exposures have negligible effects in adults and children. Variation in kinetics and level of activity were investigated but found to have minimal impact on the variation in response at the doses currently received from dietary exposures. Assessment fac- tors are not required in this analysis since effects are predicted in humans and variability in humans is modeled directly. This exam- ple of source-to-effect modeling demonstrates the feasibility of linking multiple models and data on food residues to directly pre- dict the risk of adverse effects. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.06.454 H13 Guidance documents on submissions for the technical and tox- icological evaluation of substances proposed for use as food additives or nutrient sources in the EU Federica Lodi , Joanne Gartlon, Majlinda Lahaniatis, Hugues Kenigswald European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food, Parma, Italy A substance shall only be authorised for use as a food additive (FA) or nutrient source (NS) on the European market if it is demonstrated that it does not represent a risk to human health at the proposed use level. The Scientific Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) deals with questions of safety in the use of FAs, NSs and other substances deliberately added to food, excluding flavourings and enzymes. For new FAs and NSs applications, the ANS Panel evaluation is based on a supporting dossier submitted by an applicant, which should follow the Guidance on Submissions for Food Additive eval- uations by the Scientific Committee on Food or the Guidance on Submissions for safety evaluation of sources of nutrients or of other ingredients proposed for use in the manufacture of foods (2001). These documents outline the technical (chemistry and expo- sure) and toxicological (core studies: metabolism, toxicokinetics, subchronic toxicity, genotoxicity, chronic toxicity and carcinogenic- ity, reproduction and developmental toxicity) data that are required in the dossier in order to allow a comprehensive evaluation of the substance. For NSs, bioavailability information of the nutrient from the source is required. Based on the data provided by the applicant and other information, the ANS Panel issues an independent Sci- entific Opinion on whether the substance will be of safety concern for human health for the proposed uses, taking into account the relevant toxicological results in animal studies or from human data and exposure estimates. Selected for Oral Presentation. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.06.455

Upload: paul-price

Post on 30-Nov-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

S etters

HAm

J

1

2

S

Idcip

orwaT

2icqaaiwte

iamaa

d

HIbr

P

1

ASa

Domanaveffid

eadnlTdVfdthpld

d

HGi

a

FK

S

Aotladse

bsuSi

ssiistaefrand exposure estimates.

� Selected for Oral Presentation.

doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.06.455

240 Abstracts / Toxicology L

11dvanced international training courses in health risk assess-ent

ohanna Zilliacus 1,∗, Annika Hanberg 2, Helen Håkansson 2

Karolinska Institutet, Biosciences and Nutrition, Huddinge, Sweden,Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine,tockholm, Sweden

mplementation of reliable and efficient risk assessment proce-ures for the exposure to various types of chemicals is of highoncern in Europe today. To meet these needs and interests theres an increasing need for well-educated experts in risk assessmentrocedures.

The EU-funded projects CASCADE and RA-COURSES have devel-ped and offer a coherent European course programme in healthisk assessment that includes 1-week-long courses. The courses,hich are given as independent modules, are open for MSc, PhD

nd post doc students, senior scientists and other professionals.he courses are organised by a network of European universities.

Eleven courses have been given in the programme during005–2009. Some of the courses are basic courses on principles

n health risk assessment including methodologies and theoreti-al approaches and some are specialized courses on for exampleuantitative analysis of toxicological effect data and state-of-thert understanding of the special difficulties involved with hazardnd exposure assessment due to early life-stage exposure to chem-cals and other toxic agents. The courses are highly over subscribed

ith more than 3 applicants for each course place. The course par-icipants come from all over Europe. The courses have receivedxcellent evaluations from the participants.

Based on the experience from the CASCADE/RA-COURSES train-ng programme as well as experience from education in toxicologyt several other universities DG SANCO at the European Com-ission is now discussing a future permanent training in risk

ssessment resulting in a certification system for European riskssessors.

oi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.06.453

12mproving the assessment of risks from dietary exposuresy modeling variation and uncertainty in exposure and doseesponse using linked exposure and PBPK/PD models

aul Price 1,∗, Karl Schnelle 2, Torka Poet 3, Paul Hinderliter 3

Dow Europe GmbH, EH&S/TERC, Horgen, United States, 2 DowgroSciences, GLOBAL AG MATH MODELING, INDIANAPOLIS, Unitedtates, 3 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Biological Monitoringnd Modeling, Richland, United States

ietary risk assessments are typically conducted based on the ratiof exposure to a No-Observed Adverse Effect Level in test ani-als and require the use of assessment or uncertainty factors to

ddress interspecies extrapolation and human variation. An alter-ative approach is to use physiologically based, pharmacokineticnd pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) models coupled with models ofariation in human physiology and longitudinal models of dietary

xposures. A case study in the use of such models is presentedor chlorpyrifos, a model compound exhibiting extensive low-doserst pass metabolism by gut, liver, and blood. Publicly availableietary residue data and publicly available dietary software mod-

189S (2009) S57–S273

ls are used to estimate longitudinal exposures for 1000 adultsnd 1000 children for the years 2002–2007. The combined modelirectly predicts the interindividual variation in exposure, intesti-al and hepatic bioactivation and detoxification, circulating blood

evels, and pharmacodynamic endpoints based on body mass index.he results of the analysis for chlorpyrifos confirmed that currentietary exposures have negligible effects in adults and children.ariation in kinetics and level of activity were investigated but

ound to have minimal impact on the variation in response at theoses currently received from dietary exposures. Assessment fac-ors are not required in this analysis since effects are predicted inumans and variability in humans is modeled directly. This exam-le of source-to-effect modeling demonstrates the feasibility of

inking multiple models and data on food residues to directly pre-ict the risk of adverse effects.

oi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.06.454

13uidance documents on submissions for the technical and tox-

cological evaluation of substances proposed for use as food

dditives or nutrient sources in the EU�

ederica Lodi ∗, Joanne Gartlon, Majlinda Lahaniatis, Huguesenigswald

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Food Additives and Nutrientources added to Food, Parma, Italy

substance shall only be authorised for use as a food additive (FA)r nutrient source (NS) on the European market if it is demonstratedhat it does not represent a risk to human health at the proposed useevel. The Scientific Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sourcesdded to Food (ANS) of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)eals with questions of safety in the use of FAs, NSs and otherubstances deliberately added to food, excluding flavourings andnzymes.

For new FAs and NSs applications, the ANS Panel evaluation isased on a supporting dossier submitted by an applicant, whichhould follow the Guidance on Submissions for Food Additive eval-ations by the Scientific Committee on Food or the Guidance onubmissions for safety evaluation of sources of nutrients or of otherngredients proposed for use in the manufacture of foods (2001).

These documents outline the technical (chemistry and expo-ure) and toxicological (core studies: metabolism, toxicokinetics,ubchronic toxicity, genotoxicity, chronic toxicity and carcinogenic-ty, reproduction and developmental toxicity) data that are requiredn the dossier in order to allow a comprehensive evaluation of theubstance. For NSs, bioavailability information of the nutrient fromhe source is required. Based on the data provided by the applicantnd other information, the ANS Panel issues an independent Sci-ntific Opinion on whether the substance will be of safety concernor human health for the proposed uses, taking into account theelevant toxicological results in animal studies or from human data