imran analysis hartral

7
 Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent Respondent's sex * At hartal, farmers cannot send their vegetables to Dhaka market and as a result that are damaged 50 100.0% 0 .0% 50 100.0%

Upload: johnakaif

Post on 14-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Imran Analysis Hartral

7/30/2019 Imran Analysis Hartral

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/imran-analysis-hartral 1/7

 

Case Processing Summary 

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Respondent's sex * At hartal,

farmers cannot send their 

vegetables to Dhaka market

and as a result that are

damaged

50 100.0% 0 .0% 50 100.0%

Page 2: Imran Analysis Hartral

7/30/2019 Imran Analysis Hartral

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/imran-analysis-hartral 2/7

 

Respondent's sex * At hartal, farmers cannot send their vegetables to Dhaka market and as a result that are damaged

Crosstabulation 

 At hartal, farmers cannot send their vegetables to

Dhaka market and as a result that are damaged

Totalstrongly disagree agree strongly agree

Respondent's sex F Count 0 3 6 9

% within Respondent's sex .0% 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

M Count 2 13 26 41

% within Respondent's sex 4.9% 31.7% 63.4% 100.0%

Total Count 2 16 32 50

% within Respondent's sex 4.0% 32.0% 64.0% 100.0%

Case Processing Summary 

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Education label * financial

loss50 100.0% 0 .0% 50 100.0%

Case Processing Summary 

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Occuparional Status * makes

person cost centered50 100.0% 0 .0% 50 100.0%

Page 3: Imran Analysis Hartral

7/30/2019 Imran Analysis Hartral

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/imran-analysis-hartral 3/7

 

Occuparional Status * makes person cost centered Crosstabulation 

makes person cost centered

strongly disagree disagree not sure agre

Occuparional Status Banker Count 0 1 1

% within Occuparional Status .0% 33.3% 33.3% 3

Day lobor Count 0 0 0

% within Occuparional Status .0% .0% .0% 2

Doctor Count 1 0 0

% within Occuparional Status 50.0% .0% .0%

Driver Count 0 0 3

% within Occuparional Status .0% .0% 60.0% 2

Employee Count 0 1 1

% within Occuparional Status .0% 20.0% 20.0% 6

Hawker Count 0 0 1

% within Occuparional Status .0% .0% 20.0% 6

Journalist Count 1 0 0

% within Occuparional Status 50.0% .0% .0% 5

Mason Count 0 1 0

% within Occuparional Status .0% 50.0% .0% 5

Nurse Count 0 0 1

% within Occuparional Status .0% .0% 50.0% 5

Player Count 0 0 0

% within Occuparional Status .0% .0% .0% 5

Rickshaw Puller Count 0 0 2

% within Occuparional Status .0% .0% 40.0% 4

Shopkeeper Count 0 0 0

% within Occuparional Status .0% .0% .0% 8

Student Count 0 0 1

% within Occuparional Status .0% .0% 20.0% 4

Teacher Count 0 0 0

Page 4: Imran Analysis Hartral

7/30/2019 Imran Analysis Hartral

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/imran-analysis-hartral 4/7

% within Occuparional Status .0% .0% .0% 5

Total Count 2 3 10

% within Occuparional Status 4.0% 6.0% 20.0% 4

Education label * financial loss Crosstabulation 

financial loss

disagree not sure agree strongly agree

Education label illiterate Count 0 0 3 2

% within Education label .0% .0% 60.0% 40.0%

literate Count 0 1 2 10

% within Education label .0% 7.7% 15.4% 76.9%

primary Count 0 0 2 4

% within Education label .0% .0% 33.3% 66.7%

secondary Count 0 0 0 2

% within Education label .0% .0% .0% 100.0%

higher secondary Count 0 0 5 8

% within Education label .0% .0% 38.5% 61.5%

others Count 1 1 2 7

% within Education label 9.1% 9.1% 18.2% 63.6%

Total Count 1 2 14 33

% within Education label 2.0% 4.0% 28.0% 66.0%

Page 5: Imran Analysis Hartral

7/30/2019 Imran Analysis Hartral

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/imran-analysis-hartral 5/7

Case Processing Summary 

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Living Status * effective tool

of political party50 100.0% 0 .0% 50 100.0%

Living Status * effective tool of political party Crosstabulation 

effective tool of political party

strongly

disagree disagree not sure agree

strongly

agree

Living Status slum Count4 3 0 4 5

% within Living Status 25.0% 18.8% .0% 25.0% 31.2%

Relative House Count 3 2 2 1 1

% within Living Status 33.3% 22.2% 22.2% 11.1% 11.1%

Rent House Count 2 3 1 6 1

% within Living Status 15.4% 23.1% 7.7% 46.2% 7.7%

4 Count 2 1 2 5 2

% within Living Status 16.7% 8.3% 16.7% 41.7% 16.7%

Total Count 11 9 5 16 9

% within Living Status 22.0% 18.0% 10.0% 32.0% 18.0%

Occuparional Status * makes person cost centered Crosstabulation 

makes person cost centered

Total

strongly

disagree disagree not sure agree strongly agree

Banker Count .0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% .0% 3

% within Occuparional Status .0% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% .0% 100

Day lobor Count .0% .0% .0% 1.0% 4.0% 5

% within Occuparional Status .0% .0% .0% 20.0% 80.0% 100

Doctor Count 1.0% .0% .0% .0% 1.0% 2

% within Occuparional Status 50.0% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 100

Driver Count .0% .0% 3.0% 1.0% 1.0% 5

Page 6: Imran Analysis Hartral

7/30/2019 Imran Analysis Hartral

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/imran-analysis-hartral 6/7

% within Occuparional Status .0% .0% 60.0% 20.0% 20.0% 100

Employee Count .0% 1.0% 1.0% 3.0% .0% 5

% within Occuparional Status .0% 20.0% 20.0% 60.0% .0% 100

Hawker Count .0% .0% 1.0% 3.0% 1.0% 5

% within Occuparional Status .0% .0% 20.0% 60.0% 20.0% 100

Journalist Count 1.0% .0% .0% 1.0% .0% 2

% within Occuparional Status 50.0% .0% .0% 50.0% .0% 100

Mason Count .0% 1.0% .0% 1.0% .0% 2

% within Occuparional Status .0% 50.0% .0% 50.0% .0% 100

Nurse Count .0% .0% 1.0% 1.0% .0% 2

% within Occuparional Status .0% .0% 50.0% 50.0% .0% 100

Player Count .0% .0% .0% 1.0% 1.0% 2

% within Occuparional Status .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 50.0% 100

Rickshaw Puller Count .0% .0% 2.0% 2.0% 1.0% 5

% within Occuparional Status .0% .0% 40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 100

Shopkeeper Count .0% .0% .0% 4.0% 1.0% 5

% within Occuparional Status .0% .0% .0% 80.0% 20.0% 100

Student Count .0% .0% 1.0% 2.0% 2.0% 5

% within Occuparional Status .0% .0% 20.0% 40.0% 40.0% 100

Teacher Count .0% .0% .0% 1.0% 1.0% 2

% within Occuparional Status .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 50.0% 100

Total Count 2.0% 3.0% 10.0% 22.0% 13.0% 50

% within Occuparional Status 4.0% 6.0% 20.0% 44.0% 26.0% 100

Case Processing Summary 

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Daily Income * benned by

legislation50 100.0% 0 .0% 50 100.0%

Page 7: Imran Analysis Hartral

7/30/2019 Imran Analysis Hartral

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/imran-analysis-hartral 7/7

 

Daily Income * benned by legislation Crosstabulation 

benned by legislation

strongly disagree disagree not sure agree strongly agree

Daily Income 1 Count 2 3 1 2 6

% within Daily Income 14.3% 21.4% 7.1% 14.3% 42.9%

2 Count 2 2 3 2 7

% within Daily Income 12.5% 12.5% 18.8% 12.5% 43.8%

3 Count 0 2 1 2 3

% within Daily Income .0% 25.0% 12.5% 25.0% 37.5%

4 Count 3 2 1 3 3

% within Daily Income 25.0% 16.7% 8.3% 25.0% 25.0%

Total Count 7 9 6 9 19

% within Daily Income 14.0% 18.0% 12.0% 18.0% 38.0%