in collaboration with c. nonaka, b. m ü ller, and s.a. bass
DESCRIPTION
New Ways to Look for the Critical Point and Phase Transition. Masayuki Asakawa. Department of Physics, Osaka University. in collaboration with C. Nonaka, B. M ü ller, and S.A. Bass S. Ejiri and M. Kitazawa. QCD Phase Diagram. LHC. RHIC. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
@ JINR 2009 @ JINR 2009 September 2009
in collaboration with C. Nonaka, B. Müller, and S.A. Bass S. Ejiri and M. Kitazawa
New Ways to Look for the Critical Point
and Phase Transition
New Ways to Look for the Critical Point
and Phase Transition
Department of Physics, Osaka UniversityDepartment of Physics, Osaka University
Masayuki AsakawaMasayuki Asakawa
M. Asakawa (Osaka University)
QCD Phase Diagram
CSC (color superconductivity)
QGPQGP ((quark-gluon plasmaquark-gluon plasma))
Hadron Phase
T
B
• chiral symmetry breaking• confinement
order ?
1st order
crossover
CEP(critical end point)160-190 MeV
5-100
RHIC
LHC
M. Asakawa (Osaka University)
Punchlines: Quantities to Look at
• Quantities not subject to Critical Slowing Down and Final State Interactions
• Quantities sensitive to CEP or Phase Transition
• Conserved Quantities unlike correlation lengths, (usual) fluctuations...etc.
What to see? How to see?
Question
M. Asakawa (Osaka University)
CEP = 2nd order phase transition, but...
If expansion is adiabatic ANDno final state int.
Divergence of Fluctuation Correlation Length Specific Heat ?Critical Opalescence?
CEP = 2nd Order Phase Transition Point
2SC
CFLeven if the system goes right throughthe critical end point…
Subject to Final State Interactions
M. Asakawa (Osaka University)
Critical Slowing Down and Final State Int.
Furthermore, critical slowing down limits the size of fluctuation, correlation length !
Time Evolution along givenisentropic trajectories (nB/s : fixed)
00
1( ) ( ) ,
zAm m m
1( ) ( ) ( )
( )eq
dm m m
d
Model H (Hohenberg and Halperin RMP49(77)435)3z
and eq
big differencealmost no enhancement
1-dim Bjorken Flow Nonaka and M.A. (2004)
M. Asakawa (Osaka University)
Locally Conserved Charges
Fluctuations of Locally Conserved Quantities
i. Net Baryon Number
ii. Net Electric Charge
iii. Net Strangeness
iv. Energy ...
Heinz, Müller, and M.A., PRL (2000)Also, Jeon and Koch, PRL (2000)
Hadron Gas Phase
• ~2/3 of hadrons carry
electric charge 1±
Net Electric Charge
QGP Phase
• only ~ 1/2 of d.o.f., i.e.
quarks and anti-quarks
carry electric charge 1 23 3,± ±
M. Asakawa (Osaka University)
Charge Fluctuation at RHIC
Predictions
QGP phase Hadron phase
D-measure2( )
4ch
QD
N
~ 1D ~ 4D( : hadron resonance gas)~ 3D
(STAR)
(PHENIX)~ 4D
2.8 0.05D Experimental Value
Białas, PLB(2002)Nonaka, Müller, Bass, M.A., PRC (2005)
Well-Explained by Quark Recombination
M. Asakawa (Osaka University)
Odd Power Fluctuation Moments
We are in need of observables that are not subject to final state interactionsWe are in need of observables that are not subject to final state interactions
Fluctuation of Conserved Charges: not subject to final state interactions
One of exceptions: Stephanov (2008) in conjunction with CEP
2Q• Usual Fluctuations such as : positive definite
Absolute values carry information of states
Odd power fluctuations :
Asakawa, Heinz, Müller, Jeon, Koch
On the other hand,
• In general, do not vanish (exception, )A• Sign also carry information of states• Sign also carry information of states
NOT positive definiteNOT positive definite
• Usually fluctuations such as 2Q have been consideredeven powereven power
M. Asakawa (Osaka University)
Physical Meaning of 3rd Fluc. Moment
B : Baryon number susceptibility
in general, has a peak along phase transition
B
B
changes the sign at QCD phase boundary !
In the Language of fluctuation moments:
33
33 2
( )1(BBB)
BB
B B
Nm
V VT
22
2
( )1 B
BB
N
V VT
B
more information than usual fluctuation
M. Asakawa (Osaka University)
(Hopefully) More Easily Measured Moments Third Moment of Electric Charge Fluctuation
3 3
3 2 3
( ) 1(QQQ)
Q
Q
Nm
VT V
2 1
3 31 1
2 2
Q u d
B I
N N N
N N
3
1 1(QQQ)
8 27 B IB
m
singular @CEP
iso-vector susceptibilitynonsingular when Isospin-symm.
Hatta and Stephanov 2002
B
I/9
M. Asakawa (Osaka University)
Mixed Moments Energy is also a conserved charge and mesurable !
2
3 3ˆ
2
3 3ˆ
( ) ( )1E(BB )
( ) ( )1(QQE)
B B
Q Q
N Tm
VT T T
N Tm
VT T
E
T
E
T
T
ˆT T T
ˆ /T
E : total energy in a subvolume
• Result with the standard NJL parameters (Nf=2)
Regions with Negative fluctuation moments
M. Asakawa (Osaka University)
More and More 3rd Moments3 2
ˆ3 5 3
ˆ
2ˆ
3 4
2ˆ
3 4
( ) ( )1(EEE)
( ) 1(BEE)
( ) 1(QEE)
2
B
B
Q
Q
E T Cm
VT T T
N E Cm
VT T
N E Cm
VT T
These quantities are expressed conciselyas derivatives of “specific heat” at constant ̂
22
ˆ 2 2ˆ
( )EC T
T VT
• diverges at critical end point• peaks on phase transition line
T
T
ˆT T T
ˆ /T “specific heat” at constant ̂
M. Asakawa (Osaka University)
Comparison of Various Moments2-flavor NJLwith standard parameters
• Different moments have different regions with negative moments
By comparing the signs of various moments, possible to pin down the origin of moments
• Negative m3(EEE) region extends to T-axis (in this particular model)• Sign of m3(EEE) may be used to estimate heat conductivity
G=5.5GeV-2
mq=5.5MeV=631MeVNear SideNear SideNear SideNear Side
Far SideFar SideFar SideFar Side
M. Asakawa (Osaka University)
Principles to Look for Other Observables
We are in need of observables that are not subject to final state interactionsWe are in need of observables that are not subject to final state interactions
After Freezeout, no effect of final state interactions
Chemical Freezeout
• usually assumed momentum independent
• but this is not right
chemical freezeout time: pT (or T) dependent
Larger pT (or T), earlier ch. freezeout
Principle I
M. Asakawa (Osaka University)
Emission Time Distribution
Emission Time
• Larger T, earlier emission
• No CEP effect (UrQMD)
M. Asakawa (Osaka University)
Principle II
Universality: QCD CEP belongs to the same universality class as 3d Ising ModelUniversality: QCD CEP belongs to the same universality class as 3d Ising Model
(T,) (r,h)
QCD Critical End Point 3d Ising Model End Point
same universality class
h : external magnetic fieldC
C
T
TTr
and BT
Further Assumptions• Size of Critical Region
• No general universality• Lattice calculation: not yet V limit• Effective Model Results ?
need to be treated as an input, at the moment
M. Asakawa (Osaka University)
Singular Part + Non-singular Part
• Matched Entropy Density
( , ) :Q Bs T Hadron Phase (excluded volume model)
QGP phase
( , ) :H Bs T
• Dimensionless Quantity: Sc
D: related to extent of critical region
2 2( , ) ( , ) crit critc B c BS T s T T D
Matching between Hadronic and QGP EOS
• Entropy Density consists of Singular and Non-Singular Parts
Requirement: reproduce both the singular behavior and known asymptotic limits
• Only Singular Part shows universal behavior
critBcrit
1 1( , ) 1 tanh ( , ) ( , ) 1 tanh ( , ) ( , )
2 2real B c B H B c B Q Bs T S T s T S T s T
M. Asakawa (Osaka University)
Isentropic Trajectories• In each volume element, Entropy (S) and Baryon Number (NB) are conserved, as long as entropy production can be ignored (= when viscosities are small)
Isentropic Trajectories (nB/s = const.)
Near CEP s and nB change rapidly
isentropic trajectories shownon-trivial behavior
Bag Model EOS case
An Example
CEP
M. Asakawa (Osaka University)
ConsequenceFor a given chemical freezeout point,prepare three isentropic trajectories:w/ and w/o CEP
Along isentropic trajectory:
As a function of pT(T):
Principle I
: near CEP steeper
B
T• FO, CO
• QCP
B
T
B
T• FO, CO
• QCP
B
TBag Model EOS(w/o CEP, usual hydro input)
p / p ratio
M. Asakawa (Osaka University)
Evolution along Isentropic Trajectory
p / p ~ exp 2B
T
with CEP steeper spectra at high PT
p
As a function of pT(T):
B
T
• FO, CO
• QCPB
T
M. Asakawa (Osaka University)
Summary
p / p ratio behaves non-monotonously near CEP
Conserved Charges and Higher Moments: Conserved Charges and Higher Moments:
Ratio : Two Principles Ratio : Two Principles
p / p
p / p
Final State Interaction and Critical Slowing Down Final State Interaction and Critical Slowing DownUsual observablessuch as large fluctuation, critical opalescence, ...etc. do not work
i) Third Fluctuation Moments of Conserved Charges take negative values in regions on the FAR SIDE of Phase Transition (more information!)
ii) Different Moments have different regions with negative moments
By comparing different moments, possible to pin down the origin of hot matter, get an idea about heat conductivity...etc.
i) Chemical Freezeout is pT(T) dependent
ii) Isentropic Trajectory behaves non-trivially near CEP (focusing)
Information on the QCD critical point:such as location, size of critical region, existence...