in-kind contribution management update allen weeks march 20, lund
TRANSCRIPT
Contents
• IKC Potential for construction phase• IKC Agreed and Planned vs total Possible value• HoA/IKC Agreements planned for Q1 and Q2
2015
Host Countries of Sweden and Denmark 47,5% Construction 15% Operations In-kind Deliverables ~3.5% Cash Investment ~96.5%
Non Host Member Countries 52,5% Construction 85% Operations In-kind Deliverables ~ 70% Cash Investment ~ 30%
Financing includes cash and deliverables
5
ESS In-Kind Contributions – General principles
• Potential in-kind contributions are defined by the ESS Programme Plan
• Values based on ESS Cost Book
• Each contract to follow a pre-defined structure
• The delivering party is wholly responsible for the contribution (technical, financial, commercial)
• In-Kind Review Committee to evaluate all IKC agreement proposals
• ESS STC/Council to approve all in-kind contracts
• Based on final evaluation the Member Country gets accredited the value of the In-Kind Contribution
€ 0
€ 100
€ 200
€ 300
€ 400
€ 500
€ 600
€ 42€ 109
€ 228
€ 382
€ 29
€ 47
€ 123
€ 127
IKC Cash
Construction cost: € 1,84 BillionIn-kind: € 750 Million
AcceleratorInstrumentsTargetControls
65%
59%
65%
75%
€ 509 M
€ 350 M
€ 155 M
€ 71 M
ESS In-kind Goals
7
Increase Emphasis on In-Kind
• Commitments by member countries to fund over one-third of ESS as in-kind
• Partners identified for more than €400M value of WPs (55% of estimated total in-kind value)
• 51 agreements in place by the end of Q1 & Q2 2015 – over €100M
• In-kind agreements on the critical path – essential to close IKC agreements with partners in 2015 to avoid schedule delay
The ESS Organization
ESS Council
Director GeneralJames Yeck
Admin & Finance Committee
In-Kind ReviewCommittee
Technical Advisory Committee
Scientific Advisory Committee
Communications, External Relations &
In-kind
Environment, Safety, Health & QA
Technical Directorate
Science Directorate
Project Support & Admin. Directorate
Conventional Facilities
PHASE 3PHASE 2PHASE 1
ESS In-kind contributions – In-Kind process
ESS Programme
PlanWPs/WU
1WPs/WU
2WPs/WU
3WPs/WU
4
EOI response
ESS + Potential party
discussion
Contract proposal
IKRC recommendation
+ Council approval
IKC frame contract +
technical annex
Detailed Design Phase
ESS + Partner Critical Design Review (CDR)
Realization and
Verification
ESS + PartnerSystem
Acceptance Review (SAR)
IKRC + Council
approval
Transfer of ownership
IKC value crediting to
member country
10
ESS In-kind Criteria
Eligible partners• Public Institutes/ universities• Partnership of public & private organizations
Partner selection criteria • Relevance to project requirements• Technical capabilities and capacities• Management and human resources• Procurement capabilities• Quality/Risk management• Historical track record and references• Availability of funding• Acceptance of ESS Schedule and Cost book value
12
Project leaders, together with IKCM and ESS management select partners.Potential partners may appeal to IKRC.
Sum of 2014
Sum of 2015
Sum of 2016
Sum of 2017
Sum of 2018
Sum of 2019
Sum of 2020
Sum of 2021
Sum of 2022
Sum of 2023
Sum of 2024
Sum of 2025
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
11 12 13 14
IKC Status in P6 – Agreed, Planned and Potential - grouped by ESS Projects
IKC – Agreed, Planned and Potential activities in Primavera
AcceleratorTargetNSSICS
WBS L2Sum of 2014
Sum of 2015
Sum of 2016
Sum of 2017
Sum of 2018
Sum of 2019
Sum of 2020
Sum of 2021
Sum of 2022
Sum of 2023
Sum of 2024
Sum of 2025
Sum of Total
11 1,665 12,875 67,383 92,477 79,902 28,960 8,029 6,736 2,249 0 0 0 300,277
12 4 5,274 23,093 42,120 30,699 2,940 0 0 0 0 0 0 104,131
13 94 4,935 23,913 27,356 35,020 36,681 29,023 24,037 19,877 12,025 5,930 1,418 220,309
14 0 333 6,522 10,304 9,870 4,670 0 0 0 0 0 0 31,698
Grand Total 1,764 23,417 120,912 172,256 155,491 73,252 37,052 30,773 22,126 12,025 5,930 1,418 656,416
IKC Planned value vs Potential (cumulative)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 20250 €M
100 €M
200 €M
300 €M
400 €M
500 €M
600 €M
700 €M
Agreed + Planned (Cumulative) Total
Agreed + Planned + Possible (Cumulative) Total
IKC Status in P6 - Agreed, Planned, Potential Projects: 11 Accelerator, 12 Target, 13 NSS, 14 ICS
15
Accelerator IKC
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 20250 €M
50 €M
100 €M
150 €M
200 €M
250 €M
300 €M
350 €M
Agreed + Planned (Cumu-lative)
Agreed + Planned + Possible (Cumulative)
IKC Status - Accelerator Project Description Budget Agreed+Planned Possible Grand
TotalAgreement signed or shortlisted to one partner
Further value possible to be provided as in-kind
11 Accelerator Systems 511,225 k 220,476 k 79,801 k
11.0
Budget Reserve. ACCSYS Project Milestones and Main Phases during Construction 6,264 k 0 k 0 k
11.1Management & Administration 20,684 k 0 k 0 k
11.2 Accelerator Physics 14,565 k 7,302 k 1,622 k
11.3Normal Conducting Front End 31,347 k 22,034 k 10,194 k
11.4Spoke Cavitites and Cryomodules (CNRS) 16,882 k 15,119 k 0 k
11.5Elliptical Cavities and Cryomodules 104,046 k 98,547 k 0 k
11.6 Beam Delivery Systems 7,726 k 0 k 0 k 11.7 Beam Diagnostics 23,232 k 1,103 k 9,955 k 11.8 Radio Frequency Systems 116,628 k 51,646 k 35,715 k 11.10 Test Stands 14,468 k 2,056 k 0 k 11.11 Cryogenics 56,073 k 9,990 k 8,371 k 11.12 Vacuum 14,302 k 0 k 8,175 k 11.13 Safety 1,643 k 0 k 0 k
11.14Lead Engineers and Availability 7,336 k 0 k 0 k
11.15 Electrical Support 6,798 k 0 k 0 k 11.16 Cooling Support 7,759 k 885 k 1,217 k 11.17 Power Converters 51,340 k 11,793 k 0 k 11.99 Installation 10,134 k 0 k 4,551 k
16
The ESS Collaboration Framework
Industrial Liaison Officers
ESS ProjectIn-kind Partner Industrial
Partner
Funding Agency
ESS Council
In-kind Review Committee
17
Summary
• ESS is already underway and very schedule driven.• Industrial Partners should view ESS long-term, as a
development opportunity, and with an eye to other research infrastructure.
• The project is a major European collaboration of the public and private sector.
• Much of ESS will be built by ‘in-kind’ partners all over Europe so its important to understand how we are organized to identify the right customer in the project.