in re nu skin enterprises securities litigation - deny motion to dismiss

3
  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION IN RE NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 2:14-cv-00033-DB ORDER Judge Hon. Dee Benson This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS This matter came before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Lead Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Defendants’ Factual or Evidentiary Submissions in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Supporting Memorandum. The Court received briefing on both motions and oral argument was heard on the Motion to Dismiss. The Court, having been duly advised in the premises hereby denies Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss in its entirety. Having denied Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, the Motion to Strike is deemed moot. DATED this 26th day of February, 2015. BY THE COURT:  _________________________ __________ Honorable Dee V. Benson United States District Court Judge Case 2:14-cv-00033-DB Document 72 Filed 02/26/15 Page 1 of 2

Upload: sam-e-antar

Post on 06-Oct-2015

48 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

"The Court, having been duly advised in the premises hereby denies Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss in its entirety."

TRANSCRIPT

  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

    IN RE NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION

    Master File No. 2:14-cv-00033-DB ORDER Judge Hon. Dee Benson

    This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS

    This matter came before the Court on the Defendants Motion to Dismiss for Failure to

    State a Claim and Lead Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Defendants Factual or Evidentiary

    Submissions in Support of Defendants Motion to Dismiss and Supporting Memorandum. The

    Court received briefing on both motions and oral argument was heard on the Motion to Dismiss.

    The Court, having been duly advised in the premises hereby denies Defendants Motion to

    Dismiss in its entirety. Having denied Defendants Motion to Dismiss, the Motion to Strike is

    deemed moot.

    DATED this 26th day of February, 2015.

    BY THE COURT: ___________________________________ Honorable Dee V. Benson United States District Court Judge

    Case 2:14-cv-00033-DB Document 72 Filed 02/26/15 Page 1 of 2

  • 2

    APPROVED AS TO FORM: CHRISTENSEN & JENSEN, P.C.

    /s/ Heidi G. Goebel Heidi G. Goebel

    LABATON SUCHAROW LLP

    Jonathan Gardner (pro hac vice) Mark S. Goldman (pro hac vice) Christine M. Fox (pro hac vice)

    Counsel for Lead Plaintiff State-Boston Retirement System and the Proposed Class PARR BROWN GEE & LOVELESS /s/ Robert S. Clark (signed with permission) Daniel E. Barnett Robert S. Clark SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP Alexis C. Coll-Very James G. Kriessman Jonathan C. Sanders Counsel for Nu Skin Enterprises

    Case 2:14-cv-00033-DB Document 72 Filed 02/26/15 Page 2 of 2