in search of excellence final
TRANSCRIPT
Presented by :
Allan 0004Pragun 0024Amit 0055
A Book Revie
w
Searching for excellence
“People who have accomplished work worthwhile have had a very high sense of the way to do things. They have not been content with mediocrity. They have not confined themselves to the beaten tracks; they have never been satisfied to do things just as others do them, but always a little better. They always pushed things that came to their hands a little higher up, this little farther on. That counts in the quality of life's work. It is constant effort to be first-class in everything one attempts that conquers the heights of excellence.”
Orison Swett Marden (1850-1924), Founder of Success magazine
What does the book talk about?
3m action almost another best better big Business champions come Companies control cost customer day division does down employees even example Excellence executive fact few find first force form get go good group hp ibm idea important individual industry innovation job know leader line little lot major Management managers market McDonald need New now number often organization own part People percent plant point president problem process Product program project put quality rather really research right sales seem service set simple simply small something story structure Success systems take task team things think three time top two use Value work years
“Almost all quality improvement comes via simplification of design, manufacturing... layout, processes, and procedures.”
“Excellent firms don't believe in excellence -
only in constant improvement and constant change.”
“The magic formula that successful businesses have discovered is to treat customers like guests and employees like people.”
Tom Peters
History Of The Book
• Published in 1982• Started as a project on Organization: Structure
and People in 1977, given by McKinsey based in San Francisco.
• In 1979, presented their findings as a 700-slide two day presentation to Siemens.
• Later PepsiCo invited to present but asked to compress the findings.
• Thus, came the eight common themes responsible for the success of a corporation.
Design of the Research
Sample SizeStarted with 62 best performing McKinsey clients
and finally examine 43 Fortune 500’s top performing companies . They were:
1. High Technology Companies2. Consumer Goods Durables Companies3. General Industrial Goods Companies of Interest4. Service Companies5. Project Management Companies6. Resource Based Companies
Design of the Research…
Tools employed for data collection:
Limited interviews from different people 25 Years of Literature Review
Results and Findings:
Came up with 22 attribute of Business Excellence Brought them down to 8 Attributes
McKinsey 7S Model
Eight Common Themes of Excellence
• A bias for action• Close to the customer• Autonomy and entrepreneurship• Productivity through people• Hands-on, value-driven - management
philosophy• Stick to the knitting• Simple form, lean staff• Simultaneous loose-tight properties
The Rational Model
American Management Style and Flaws
1. The Business Schools are doing us in.2. The so-called professional managers lack the right
perspective3. Managers do not personally identify with what their
companies do.4. Managers do not take enough interest in their people5. Top managers and their staff have become isolated in
their analytic ivory towers.
Man Waiting for Motivation
Simplicity and Complexity• The excellent companies intentionally keep
corporate staff small.• Eliminate Paper work. E.g. P&G (Just one page
Memo)
Positive ReinforcementTwo ways to gain attention:1. Attempt through positive reinforcement to lead
people gently over a period of time to pay attention to new article.
2. The reinforcement should be immediacy.
Managing Ambiguity and Paradox
The test of a first rated intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function.
F. Scott Fitzgerald
As a leader, you are either authoritarian or democratic.
But in reality you are neither and both at the same time.
e.g. Messrs Watson (IBM)Kroc (McDonald)Mariot et al.
Four Stages of Theory and Leading Theorists
1. (1900-1930)WeberTaylor
2.(1930-1960)
Mayo et.al.Mc GregorBernardSeiznick
4.(1970-?)WeickMarch
Rational Actor
Social Actor
Closed System Open System
Importance of Culture and Evolution
They say that business has to be fiscally sound but their value set integrates the notions of economic health, serving customs and making money down the line.
To the extent that culture and shared values are important in unifying the social dimensions of an organization, managed evolution is important in keeping a company adaptive
A Bias for action
• Ambiguity in articulation of action orientation.
• Organizational fluidity ( presence of action devices ).
• Adhocracy
• MBWA
• E.g. Of Coning glass.
• Chunking, E.g. Exxon, Japan.
• Experimenting organizations.
• Alacrity and sheer numbers of experiments are
ingredients of success.
• Amoco oil wells.
• Bootlegging at GE. (relative invisibility)
Close to the customer
Customer is being ignored or considered a nuisance.
Nichemanship
Feedback
Customer Orientation
Autonomy and Entrepreneurship
• Companies making a purposeful tradeoff.
• The Champions.
• Probability of success .
• Tolerating Failure.( 3M’s 11th commanment)
Product Champion Successful executive champion Godfather
Productivity through people
• Key to people orientation – Trust.• “people” and not workers, “Crew
members” and not personnel.• Success stories.
HP
IBMWalmart
HANDS ON,VALUE DRIVEN
• Figure out your value system and decide what
your company stands for
• Value is what an organisation does that gives
everybody working in it the most pride
• Values may not be hard like Structure,
policies,strategies etc-Philips and kennedy
• However not in excellent companies
• Why does a company really fail??
• Reason- Values cannot be copied.
• Caterpillar-dealers, J and J- railroad workers
• Examples are Being the best, superior quality and
service
• Persistence is vital when sticking to values
• HANDS ON MANAGEMENT is Management by
wandering around
• “Do not summon people to your office”
• ED Calson of United Airlines( American CEOS)
• Do not develop corporate cancer
• Maintain good relationship with line positions
STICK TO THE KNITTING
• Todays Conglomerates
• Heubleins Acquisition of Conel Sanders in liquor
business- “ Bought 5000 Stores!!!”
• Du ponts acquistion of Connocos Oil business
• Is it credible for a Electronics executive to talk
about Consumer goods?
• Most succesful diversification are those which
diversify around a single skill
eg:3M- The coating and bonding technology
• Related diversification is ok- GE from generation
turbines to jet engines
• Least succesful is reckless diversificiation
• No synergy among most conglomerates
• Pioneering European companies prefer internal
expansion to mergers-Airbus,Benz
• “Great companies do not test new waters with
both feet”
• “Small is beautiful”
• Ill advised forays- P and G with pringles
• “ COLGATE trying to become the firm it was a
decade ago”
SIMPLE FORM,LEAN STAFF
• Along with size comes Complexity
• Most complex-Matrix Organisation structure
• It consists of product grouping,Market segment,
geographic area plus basic functions
• It dilutes priorites Eg: dual control between
production and functional managers
• Boeing- either project team or technical discipline(
gave rise to project management)
• Follow any one dimension only
• J and J- 150 independent divisions
• Simplicity is the best form of flexibility
• LEAN STAFF- few administrators, more
operators
• Not more than 100 in corporate office
• Cut down on hierarchy
• Five levels of management in TOYOTA, 15 in ford
• Structure of 80’s- Breaking old habits , Stability
through simplicity and Entrepreneurship
SIMULTANEOUS LOOSE TIGHT PROPERTIES
• It is essence the co-existence of firm central
direction and maximum autonomy
• Best managers like procter, Hewlet packard were
strict disciplinarians but gave maximum autonomy
• “Give plenty of rope but accept the chance
that people would hang themselves”
• Culture- @ IBM it is service, chemical engineers @
3m
• Excellent companies have self defense mechanism-
customers,peers etc
• PARADOXES• Quality vs cost- “ If u make a good with quality you
don’t have to make it twice”
• Execution vs autonomy-Classroom (autonomy is
product of discipline)
• Short vs Long term trade off-Believe more in
values
• Smart-Dumb Rule- MBA vs simpleton
• People who lead excellent companies are simple
people eg: Marriot ,procter,gamble,hewlett
packard
Thank You