in the court of the special judge, c.b.i., …kamrupjudiciary.gov.in/mar-15 jdgmnt/26-03-2015...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Spl. Case No.12/2008
IN THE COURT OF THE SPECIAL JUDGE, C.B.I.,ASSAM, GUWAHATI
Special Case No. 12/2008RC Case No. 04(A)/2008-GWH
Present:- Sri M.K. Bhattacharjee Special Judge, CBI, Assam, Guwahati.
State (C.B.I.)
Vs.
1. Sri Khairuddin Ahmed
2. Sri Giasuddin Ahmed
3. Sri Imtiazuddin Ahmed
4. Sri Rafiqul Islam
5. Sri Babul Nath
6. Sri Dipak Kumar Das
7. Sri Hitendra Saikia
U/S 120B, 409, 420 IPC
……….. Accused
Prosecution Lawyer : Sh. A. Bhattacharjee, Ld. P.P, CBI
Defence Lawyers : Sri D.K.Das, Sri S.K. Talukdar, Sri S.K.Singh
Dates of recording Prosecution Evidence : 23.4.12, 6.6.12,
10.7.12, 26.11.12, 12.2.13, 22.2.13, 13.3.13, 23.5.13,
24.5.13, 25.6.13, 26.6.13, 9.7.13, 10.7.13, 31.7.13,
2
Spl. Case No.12/2008
1.8.13, 4.9.13, 5.9.13, 4.11.13, 5.11.13, 20.5.14,
26.6.14 & 24.7.14.
Dates of recording Defence Evidence : 28.11.14, 11.12.14
Argument concluded on : 12.3.2015
Date of Judgment : 26.3.2015
JUDGMENT
On 22.03.2008, Zonal Manager of UCO Bank, Regional
Office, Jorhat, Assam wrote a letter to the S.P, CBI, ACB,
Guwahati alleging, inter alia, that the accused public servant Sri
Padma Kanta Bania, Branch Manager, UCO Bank, Goalpara,
Assan had entered into a criminal conspiracy with some private
persons namely, Khairuddin Ahmed, Giasuddin Ahmed,
Imtiazuddin Ahmed, Rafiqul Islam, Babul Nath, Dipak Kumar
Das and Hitendra Saikia and fraudulently and dishonestly
sanctioned 300 nos. of fake loans during the year 2005-06 for
an amount of Rs. 184.77 lakhs in total to non existing persons
resulting into huge wrongful pecuniary loss to the Bank and
proportionate wrongful gain to perpetrators of the crime.
2. On receipt of the aforesaid complaint a case was
registered at the CBI, ACB, Guwahati. The case was endorsed
to Sh. K.R. Kabui, Inspector of Police, CBI, Guwahati for
investigation. On completion of the investigation the I/O
submitted charge sheet against accused P.K. Bania, Khairuddin
Ahmed, Giasuddin Ahmed, Imtiazuddin Ahmed, Rafiqul Islam,
3
Spl. Case No.12/2008
Babul Nath, Dipak Kumar Das and Hitendra Saikia u/s 120B,
409, 420 IPC read with Section 13(1)(c) & (d) and Section
13(2) of the PC Act.
3. Prosecution case in brief is that during the period 2005-
06, about 30 Kishan Cash Credit loans were sanctioned by
accused Padma Kanta Bania, while he was In-charge of
Panchmile Branch of UCO bank, to the persons who were non-
existent and accounts in the names of such non-existent
persons were opened in the Bank being introduced by the co-
accused. The accused even stood as guarantors for the fake
loanees.
4. Accused Khairuddin Ahmed introduced the “fake”
loanees Piar Hussain, Tinku Haque, Noor Jamal and also stood
as guarantor for these borrowers. Similarly, accused Giasuddin
Ahmed introduced Md. Syed Ali and Badal Nath; accused
Imtiazuddin Ahmed introduced and stood guarantor for Ramjan
Ali, Mofizuddin , Abdul Zabbar, Abdul Rashid, Pradip Nath;
accused Rafiqul Islam introduced Md. Gazizur Rahman, Hamed
Ali, Abdul Rashid, Abul Hussain, Ismail Ali; accused Babul Nath
introduced Pawan Das and Chintu Das. All the borrowers were
subsequently found to be non-existent and as such the loan
accounts became non-performing.
5. Investigation further revealed that Sri Dipak Kumar Das
opened an account as a proprietor of M/s Assam Tea Company
and availed Cash Credit limit (loan) of Rs. 8 lacs for which
Hitendra Saikia was shown as guarantor though no such firm
4
Spl. Case No.12/2008
named M/s Assam Tea Company was ever in existence at the
given address.
6. Investigation also revealed that loan documents in
question were not fully filled up and some of the pages were
completely blank which was clear indication of criminal
connivance between the Bank Official Sri Bania and the
remaining accused.
7. After furnishing copies of the materials submitted by
the I/O u/s 173 CrPc to the accused and on consideration of
such materials my learned predecessor charged the accused as
under. Accused Padma Kanta Bania, being the public servant,
was charged u/s 13(2) read with Section 13(1) (c) and (d) of
the PC Act. He was also charged u/s 120B, 409 and 420 IPC
along with the other accused who are private persons. When
the charges were read over and explained to the accused they
pleaded not guilty.
8. Prosecution examined 18 witnesses who were cross-
examined by the defence. During trial accused Padma Kanta
Bania expired and the case against him stood abated. All the
remaining accused were examined u/s 313 Cr.PC. They denied
having introduced non-existent persons. They also denied to
have entered into a criminal conspiracy with Sri Bania with
intention to defraud the Bank. Four defence witnesses were
also examined to show that the alleged borrowers were in
existence and hence by introducing them to the bank for
5
Spl. Case No.12/2008
opening of account or by standing as guarantors of the loan
accounts in question they did not commit any criminal act.
9. POINTS FOR DETERMINATION:
1. Whether the accused agreed to do or caused to be done
an act which was illegal or was to be done by illegal
means?
2. Whether said illegal act was done by the accused or any
one of them in pursuance of such agreement?
3. Whether in pursuance of the agreement to do illegal act,
the accused committed criminal breach of trust in respect
of an amount of Rs. 15 lacs which was entrusted to co-
accused Padma Kanta Bania, since deceased?
4. Whether the accused in pursuance of their agreement, by
doing the illegal act, cheated the bank and caused
wrongful loss to the Bank and wrongful gain to
themselves?
10. DECISION TO THE AFORESAID POINTD AND
REASONS THEREOF:-During argument learned PP, CBI
submitted that the borrowers, in question, were non-existent
and by introducing fake persons to the Bank and standing as
their guarantors in regard to the respective loan accounts, the
accused not only betrayed the criminal agreement they had
entered into with each other and the concerned Bank official
but had also cheated the bank. Admittedly, the prime accused
of the case Mr. P. K. Bania, a Bank official, had since expired
and the case against him stands abated. Learned defence
6
Spl. Case No.12/2008
lawyers, on the other hand, argued that mere introducing some
persons to the bank for the purpose of opening accounts or
standing as guarantors to their loan accounts can never be held
as criminal act. It was further argued that the prosecution failed
to prove beyond reasonable doubt that such persons were not
in existence. Rather evidence on record was indicative of the
fact that such persons were in existence at the relevant time.
As guarantors the accused were liable to make good the loan.
11. The main contention of the prosecution is that the
charged accused knowingly introduced non-existent entities to
the bank for facilitating opening of account in their name and
also stood as guarantors for them and such act was indicating
to their criminal intention to defraud the Bank. Let me now
discuss the materials available on record to see whether the
prosecution was able to prove the case against the accused
beyond all reasonable doubt.
12. The allegation against accused (A-2) Khairuddin
Ahmed was that he introduced Piar Hussain, Tinku Haque and
Noor Jamal. PW-9, Nilakanta Kalita, an UCO Bank employee
proved the specimen signature card of borrower Piar Hussain.
During cross-examination, the witness stated that when he
started to visit the recorded addresses of the alleged non-
existent borrowers, he found some of the respective borrowers
in their respective addresses. PW-11, Uttam Paul, an employee
of UCO Bank deposed that at the time of the alleged occurrence
A-2, Khairuddin Ahmed was a good customer of the bank and
7
Spl. Case No.12/2008
he knew him personally. PW-9, Sri Nilakanta Kalita also proved
the specimen signature card of Tink Haque and it was shown
that Sri Haque was introduced to the bank by A-2. From the
testimony of PW-9, it also appeared that Tinku Haque furnished
his land documents at the time of obtaining the loan and Ext.
34 is the hypothecation cum agreement for the relevant
agricultural loan. DW-2 exhibited the certified copy of the voter
list showing his name at Serial no. 171. In regard to Noor
Jamal, PW-8, Md. Hormuj Ali stated that Noor Jamal was very
much present in the village. This witness was declared hostile
by the prosecution. During cross-examination by the defence
the witness stated that Noor Jamal was very much present in
the village till that day and his name also appears in the voter
list. DW-2, exhibited certified copy of the relevant voter list
which shows that the name of Noor Jamal appears in the Serial
No. 2 of the voter list. On the aforesaid, it appears that the
three persons who were introduced to the bank by Khairuddin
Ahmed and for whose loan account, he stood as guarantor,
were not proved to be non-existent persons/borrowers beyond
reasonable doubt by the prosecution.
13. The allegation against accused (A-3) Giasuddin
was that he introduced Md. Syed Ali who took a loan of Rs.
45,000/- and Badal Nath who also took loan of Rs. 45,000/-.
PW-9, Sri Nilakanta Kalita exhibited the specimen signature card
of Md. Syed Ali which also contains Sri Syed Ali’s photograph.
Ext. 40 is the account opening form of Syed Ali and it appears
from Ext. 40 that the account was allowed to be opened by PW-
8
Spl. Case No.12/2008
11, Uttam Paul, the then Bank employee. It is the contention of
the defence that since there is no case by the prosecution for
criminal conspiracy against the bank employee, Uttam Paul, A-
3, Giasuddin Ahmed cannot be held responsible for introducing
Syed Ali to the bank. PW-1 and PW-7 in their testimony stated
that they did not find Syed Ali in the village but PW-8 Hormuj
Ali during his cross-examination by the prosecution stated that
he had seen Syed Ali. That apart, DW-2, who exhibited certified
copy of the voter list (Ext.-J) showed that name of Syed Ali was
there at Serial No. 123 of the voter list. In regard to borrower
Badal Nath, PW-9, Sri Nilakanta Kalita proved his specimen
signature card ( Ext. 41) which also contains Badal Nath’s
photograph. Ext. 42 is the account opening form of Badal Nath
with his address and photograph. Ext. 48 is the hypothecation
cum agreement for agricultural loan taken by Badal Nath. Ext.-P
exhibited by DW-2 shows the name of Badal Nath which
appears in Serial No. 556 of the voter list. In view of the above,
it is difficult to hold that prosecution has been able to prove all
beyond reasonable doubt that Syed Ali and Badal Nath who
took loan from the bank at the relevant time were non-existent
entities.
14. Accused (A-4) Imtiazuddin Ahmed introduced
five persons namely, Ramjan Ali, Mofizuddin, Abdul Jabbar,
Abdul Rashid and Pradip Nath to the UCO Bank who also took
loan from the bank whom the prosecution claimed to have
branded as non-existent entities. Specimen signature card of
Ramjan Ali along with his photograph affixed on it and loan
9
Spl. Case No.12/2008
opening form with address and photograph were exhibited by
PW-9 as Ext. 51 and 52. PW-12, who was declared hostile by
the prosecution stated that he knew Ramjan Ali. PW-14, an
officer of the UCO Bank deposed that after the CBI case started
most of the borrowers started to repay the loan spontaneously.
DW-2 exhibited certified copy of the relevant voter list as Ext-L
which shows the name of Ramjan Ali in Serial No. 376.
Specimen signature card and account opening form in regard to
Mofizuddin were proved by PW-9, Nilakanta Kalita as Ext. 62
and 63. PW-12 says that he also knew Mofizuddin. DW-2
exhibited certified copy of the relevant voter list as Ext-M which
shows name of Mofizuddin in Serial No. 438. Specimen
signature card of Abdul Jabbar was proved by Nilakanta Kalita.
DW-2 exhibited certified copy of the relevant voter list as Ext-N
which shows Abdul Jabbar’s name at Serial No. 84. In regard to
Abdul Rashid, PW-3, Abdul Khalek, a Post Man deposed that he
could not find Abdul Rashid. The question now arises whether a
statement by a Post Master regarding non finding of the person
can be held to be conclusive proof of his being a non-existent
entities. It is extremely difficult to accept the aforesaid
contention particularly when the person alleged to have opened
bank account being introduced by eligible persons. In regard to
Pradip Nath, the alleged non-existent entity, it is seen that his
application for agricultural loan and debit voucher were proved
by PW-9 as Ext. 116 and 114 respectively. PW-5, Umar
Faruque, a Gaonbura deposed that he did not know any person
named Pradip Nath in the locality. But during cross examination
10
Spl. Case No.12/2008
when the photograph of Pradip Nath was shown to him
(document Marked –X) he stated that the person in the
photograph is presently residing at Napam Village due to
erosion of Jia Bharali river.
15. Accused A-5 Rafiqul Islam introduced Md. Gazizur
Rahman, Hamid Ali, Abdul Rashid, Abul Hussain and Ismail Ali
to the bank and also stood as guarantor for the loan obtained
from the bank by them. PW-3, Sri Abdul Khalek stated that as
Post Man he was required to deliver sealed envelopes in the
name of Md. Ismail Ali, Gazizur Rahman, Abul Hussain, Abdul
Rashid and Hamid Ali at the addresses recorded in the sealed
envelopes. He further stated that he could not deliver the
sealed envelopes because the addressees were not available at
the given addresses. He exhibited those sealed envelopes as
Ext. 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 respectively. The recorded addresses were
at Uriamguri village. During cross-examination, the Post Man
(PW-3) stated that there were two long streets in Uriamguri
village and he did not know the names of these streets. He
further admitted that Ext. 2 to Ext 6 were returned by him in
the same day i.e. on 19.12.2009. In other part of his cross-
examination he further stated that to deliver Ext 2, 5 and 6, he
went to the houses of the addressees who he knew and sealed
envelopes in the name of Ismail Ali could not be delivered since
he had already expired and Ext. 5 and 6 were not delivered
because father’s name was not correctly mentioned. From the
above it cannot be held that all the persons introduced by
Rafiqul Islam have been proved beyond reasonable doubt to be
11
Spl. Case No.12/2008
non-existent entities. On the contrary, it appeared from the
testimony of PW 3 that there were persons of that name. The
conduct of the witness (Postman) in returning all the letters, as
mentioned and exhibited, also gave rise to suspicion as he
admittedly returned all the envelopes undelivered on the same
day without making any further attempt to deliver the letters.
15. Accused (A-6) Babul Nath introduced Sri Pawan
Das and Chintu Das who were alleged to be non-existent
persons. PW-6, Smt. Nafiza Begum, Village Head person of
Balichapori and Balika Chuburi village deposed, during her
examination-in-chief, that she has never know persons named
Chintu Das and Pawan Das. She also stated that record of voter
list of their village is maintained in the office of Gaonbura.
During the cross-examination she admitted that it is not
possible to remember the names of all persons in the village
simply because the village Head person had not met the two
persons of the names mentioned above, perhaps, conclusively
hold that these persons actually did not exist.
16. Accused (A-8) Hitendra Saikia stood as guarantor
to the loan taken by accused (A-7) Dipak Kumar Das for M/s
Assam Tea Company. PW-2 and PW-4 deposed that they have
never heard of any firm named M/s Assam Tea Company. The
prosecution case is that accused Hitendra Saikia and Dipak
Kumar Das knowingly and illegally obtained the loan for M/s
Assam Tea Company for the purpose of taking the loan. From
the testimony of PW-11, Uttam Paul the employee of the UCO
bank, Sh. Hitendra Saikia was a customer of the bank who
12
Spl. Case No.12/2008
stood a guarantor for the loan account of Sri Dipak Kumar Das
for M/s Assam Tea Company. From the testimony of DW-4, an
officer of UCO Bank, who appeared in the Court on receipt of
summons and to produce the statement of Accounts of Assam
Tea Company and compromise letter of M/s Assam Tea
Company, it appeared that there were transactions in the
account. The said copy of the statement was exhibited as Ext.-
Q and the Compromise letter is exhibited as Ext.-R. The witness
further stated that there were realisation in the account of M/s
Assam Tea Company and that bank agreed for the compromise
settlement for closing of the loan account on payment of Rs,
4,73,474.00/-. It is obvious from the aforesaid that Dipak
Kumar Das who took the loan for M/s Assam Tea Company
cannot be said to be non-existent entity. There were
transactions in the said loan account and when the loan
became bad, bank entered into a discussion for settlement of
the loan account. From the said facts it can be clearly held that
accused Dipak kumar Das, who took loan for M/S Assam Tea
Company was very much in existence and hence he and the
guarantor accused Hitendra Saikia cannot be held to have taken
part in any criminal conspiracy nor had fraudulently cheated the
Bank.
17. During argument learned Spl. PP submitted that the
certified copies of the voter list shows that some of the persons
who allegedly took loan were not voter of the relevant
constituency and thus these persons were non-existent.
Learned defence lawyer submitted that certified copies of the
13
Spl. Case No.12/2008
entries of the Electoral Roll is only conclusive evidence of the
fact that the persons whose names found mentioned in the
Electoral Roll is the elector of that constituency unless it is
proved that he is disqualified to be electoral otherwise. The
main crux of the prosecution was that the accused knowingly
and intentionally introduced to the Bank such persons who
were never in existence and also stood guarantor to their loan
accounts in connivance with the concerned Bank official who
has expired during trial of the case. It is a fact that it may not
be always possible to give affirmative evidence about the date
of the formation of the conspiracy about the persons who took
part in the conspiracy. Circumstantial evidence is enough to
show that the accused were part of a criminal conspiracy. In
this case prosecution sought to show that the accused persons
introduced certain persons to the Bank who were not in
existence in reality. That apart, the accused also stood as
guarantor to the loan accounts of the respective persons whom
they introduced. We have already seen that the prosecution
could not prove beyond reasonable doubt that such persons
were indeed nonexistent. Moreover, the fact that the accused
stood as guarantors for loan accounts of such persons would
indicate that those persons must have existed. Any guarantor
would know that he would be equally liable to pay off the loan
in case the borrower defaults. Certain other circumstances, as
found in the evidence, also weaken the prosecution case. PW
14, Sri T. Nath, the then Branch Manager of the Panchmile
Branch of UCO Bank, stated that he joined in the branch on
14
Spl. Case No.12/2008
16.7.2009 and remained there as Branch manager till 30.10.11.
The alleged loans were disbursed from this branch during 2005-
06. He further stated, during cross examination, that many
such loans, during his tenure, were recovered. The relevant
part of his cross examination runs as under:- “I was in-charge
of the said Branch till 30.11.2011. During my tenure large
numbers of so called fraud loans involving this case have been
recovered. After the CBI case started most of the borrowers
started repaying loan amounts spontaneously and at my
initiative also they have recovered substantial amounts of loan.”
The aforesaid statement of the officer of the concerned Bank
also strongly indicated that there was perhaps no fraudulent
intention on the part of the accused, who are standing trial as
on today, to defraud the bank. There was also absolutely no
evidence to show that wrongful gain was caused to the
aforesaid accused.
18. Indeed the proof or otherwise in a case of criminal
conspiracy is ordinarily a matter of inference and such inference
can be drawn on evaluation of proved circumstances. But in the
instant case no such circumstances appeared to have been
proved on the basis of which such inference of criminal
conspiracy could be safely drawn. There was no proof to show
that the accused facilitated sanction of loan to fake persons.
During investigation I/O obtained specimen handwriting/
signatures of the accused (facing trial) but there appeared no
such evidence to show that the accused, facing trial as on date,
15
Spl. Case No.12/2008
committed any such act which could be held to be strong
circumstance against them.
19. In view of the above, it appears to me that the
prosecution has not been able to prove beyond reasonable
doubt the charges framed against accused Khairuddin Ahmed,
Giasuddin Ahmed, Imtiazuddin Ahmed, Rafiqul Islam, Babul
Nath, Dipak Kumar Das and Hitendra saikia. These accused are
therefore, acquitted and set at liberty. Their bail bonds stand
cancelled.
Given under my hand and seal of this court on this 26th
day of March, 2015.
Special JudgeCBI Court, AssamGuwahati
16
Spl. Case No.12/2008
A N N E X U R EList of Prosecution Witnesses :
Sl. No. Witness No. Name of the Witness
1. PW-1 Sh. Suresh Kumar Subba2. PW-2 Sh. Vikram Chand Joshi3. PW-3 Sh. Abdul Khalek4. PW-4 Sh. Tapan Ganguli5. PW-5 Sh. Umar Farooque6. PW-6 Smt. Nafiza Begum7. PW-7 Md. Ramjan Ali8. PW-8 Md. Harmuj Ali9. PW-9 Sh. Nila Kanta Kalita10. PW-10 Mrs. Miranda Das11. PW-11 Sh. Uttam Paul12. PW-12 Sh. Gopal Chetry13. PW-13 Sh. Amar Chand Slath14. PW-14 Sh. Tuleshwar Nath15. PW-15 Smt. Subha Bhattacharya16. PW-16 Sh. Girish Baishya17. PW-17 Sh. M.T. Mang18. PW-18 Sh. Vinod Kumar
List of Defence Witnesses :
Sl. No. Witness No. Name of the Witness
1. DW-1 Sh. Somnath Sarma2. DW-2 Sh. Abdul Kuddus3. DW-3 Sh. Jayanta Kumar Nath4. DW-4 Sh. Mirzamal Rabha
17
Spl. Case No.12/2008
List of Prosecution Documents :Sl. No. Exhibit No. Nature of Documents
1. Ext.1 Letter no. 4621.2. Ext.2 to Ext.6 Sealed envelopes.3. Document X Photograph4. Ext.7 Specimen signature card.5. Ext.8 Account opening form.6. Ext.9 Transfer credit voucher.7. Ext.10 Debit voucher.8. Ext.11 Certified copy of the loan ledger.9. Ext.12 Specimen signature card.10. Ext.13 Account opening form.11. Ext.14 Transfer credit voucher.12. Ext.15 Debit loan voucher.13. Ext.16 Extract of the loan ledger folio.14. Ext.17 Acknowledgement of demand promissory note. 15. Ext.18 Demand promissory note.16. Ext.19 Balance confirmation certificate.17. Ext.20 Loan application.18. Ext.21 Hypothecation cum agreement for agricultural
loan.19. Ext.22 Confirmation letter.20. Ext.23 Specimen signature card.21. Ext.24 Account application form.22. Ext.25 Loan debit transfer voucher.23. Ext.26 Extract of loan ledger.24. Ext.27 & Ext.28 Application forms.25. Ext.29 Acknowledgement of demand promissory note.26. Ext.30 Agreement in the bank format.27. Ext.31 Balance confirmation in the bank format.28. Ext.32 Blank non judicial stamp paper.29. Ext.33 Letter of waiver of demand promissory note.30. Ext.34 Hypothecation cum agreement.31. Ext.35 Balance confirmation.32. Ext.36 Demand promissory note.33. Ext.37 Blank non judicial stamp paper.34. Ext.38 Application for agricultural credit short term
loan.35. Ext.39 Specimen signature card.36. Ext.40 Savings account application form.37. Ext.41 Specimen signature card.38. Ext.42 Application form of savings bank account.39. Ext.43 Application form for agriculture short term loan.40. Ext.44 Savings credit voucher.41. Ext.45 Loan account debit voucher.42. Ext.46 Request letter for grant of Kishan Credit Card.43. Ext.47 Balance confirmation certificate.44. Ext.48 Hypothecation cum agreement.45. Ext.49 Acknowledgement of confirming the demand
18
Spl. Case No.12/2008
promissory note.46. Ext.50 Blank non judicial stamp paper.47. Ext.51 Specimen signature card.48. Ext.52 Application for opening of savings account.49. Ext.53 Transfer credit voucher.50. Ext.54 Debit voucher of the loan account.51. Ext.55 Application for agriculture credit short term
loan.52. Ext.56 Request of issuance of Kishan Credit Card.53. Ext.57 Balance confirmation of the loan account.54. Ext.58 Crop loan agreement. 55. Ext.59 Bank format in proforma A/117.56. Ext.60 Acknowledgement confirming the demand
promissory note. 57. Ext.61 Blank non judicial stamp paper. 58. Ext.62 Specimen signature card. 59. Ext.63 Account opening form.60. Ext.64 Extract of the loan ledger folio.61. Ext.64/1 Certificate.62. Ext.65 Application for agriculture Credit short term
loan.63. Ext.66 Balance confirmation of the loan.64. Ext.67 Request for issuance of Kishan Credit Card.65. Ext.68 Agreement of crop loan.66. Ext.69 Bank format in form of A/117.67. Ext.70 Non judicial stamp paper.68. Ext.71 Acknowledgement confirming the demand
promissory.69. Ext.72 Specimen Signature Card.70. Ext.73 Credit voucher.71. Ext.74 Debit Voucher.72. Ext.75 Request letter for issuance of KCC73. Ext.76 Application for agriculture loan.74. Ext.77 Sanction advice for KCC.75. Ext.78 Balance confirmation certificate.76. Ext.79 Bank format No.A/117.77. Ext.80 Agreement for crop loan.78. Ext.81 Acknowledgment.79. Ext.82 Stamp paper.80. Ext.83 Debit voucher.81. Ext.84 Loan ledger.82. Ext.85 Application for agriculture loan.83. Ext.86 Balance confirmation certificate.84. Ext.87 Sanction advice of loan.85. Ext.88 Request letter for issuance of KCC.86. Ext.89 Agreement.87. Ext.90 Bank format No.A/117.88. Ext.91 Acknowledgment.89. Ext.92 Stamp paper.90. Ext.93 Specimen Signature Card.
19
Spl. Case No.12/2008
91. Ext.94 Account opening form.92. Ext.95 Debit voucher.93. Ext.96 Credit voucher.94. Ext.97 Loan ledger.95. Ext.98 Demand promissory note.96. Ext.99 Sanction advice.97. Ext.100 Application for agriculture loan.98. Ext.101 Hypothecation.99. Ext.102 Acknowledgment.100. Ext.103 Specimen signature card.101. Ext.104 Application form.102. Ext.105 Credit voucher.103. Ext.106 Debit voucher.104. Ext.107 Loan ledger.105. Ext.108 Balance confirmation certificate.106. Ext.109 Demand promissory note.107. Ext.110 Sanction advice.108. Ext.111 Application for agriculture loan.109. Ext.112 Hypothecation.110. Ext.113 Acknowledgment.111. Ext.114 Debit voucher.112. Ext.115 Extract of loan ledger.113. Ext.116 Application for agriculture loan.114. Ext.117 Demand promissory note.115. Ext.118 Request letter for issuance of KCC.116. Ext.119 Acknowledgment.117. Ext.120 Non judicial stamp paper.118. Ext.121 Agreement.119. Ext.122 Bank format No.A/117.120. Ext.123 Seizure memo dt.12.6.08.121. Ext.124 Letter dt.26.6.08.122. Ext.125 Seizure memo.123. Ext.126 Seizure memo dt.2.7.08.124. Ext.127 Letter dt.24.2.2010.125. Ext.128 Letter.126. Ext.129 Account opening form.127. Ext.130 Specimen signature card.128. Ext.131 Debit voucher.129. Ext.132 Credit voucher.130. Ext.133 Debit voucher.131. Ext.134 Credit voucher.132. Ext.135 Debit voucher.133. Ext.136 Credit voucher.134. Ext.137 Account opening form.135. Ext.138 & 139 Specimen signature cards.136. Ext.140 Account opening form.137. Ext.141 Application for opening an S/B account.138. Ext.142 &143 Specimen signature cards.139. Ext.144 & 145 Application for opening an S/B account.140. Ext.146 Specimen signature card.
20
Spl. Case No.12/2008
141. Ext.147 Account application form.142. Ext.148 Specimen signature card.143. Ext.149 Account opening form.144. Ext.150 Specimen signature card.145. Ext.151 Account opening form.146. Ext.152 Specimen signature card.147. Ext.153 Account opening form.148. Ext.154 Specimen signature card.149. Ext.155 & 156 Credit vouchers.150. Ext.157 & 158 Debit vouchers.151. Ext.159 Specimen signature card.152. Ext.160 Account opening form.153. Ext.161 Credit voucher.154. Ext.162 Debit voucher.155. Ext.163 Account opening form.156. Ext.164 Specimen signature card.157. Ext.165 Credit voucher.158. Ext.166 Debit voucher.159. Ext.167 Account opening form.160. Ext.168 Specimen signature card.161. Ext.169 & 170 Credit vouchers.162. Ext.171 & 172 Debit vouchers.163. Ext.173 Seizure memo dt. 2.12.2009.164. Ext.174 Letter dt.5.12.09.165. Ext.175 File.166. Ext.176 Transfer Order.167. Ext.177 Letter dt.23.2.2010.168. Ext.178 & 183 Specimen writings and signatures.169. Ext.184 F.I.R.170. Ext.185 Envelope.171. Ext.186 & 187 Specimen writings and signatures.172. Ext.188 GEQD Report.173. Ext.189 Ledger Folio.174. Ext.190 Hypothecation.175. Ext.191 Letter of consent.176. Ext.192 Guarantor’s statement.177. Ext.193 Undertaking.178. Ext.194 Non judicial stamp paper.179. Ext.195 Loan application.180. Ext.196 Process note.181. Ext.197 Sanction advice.182. Ext.198 Balance confirmation.183. Ext.199 Letter of consent.184. Ext.200 Project Report.185. Ext.201 & 202 Non judicial stamp papers.186. Ext.203 Acknowledgment.187. Ext.204 Demand promissory note.188. Ext.205 Acknowledgment.189. Ext.206 & 207 Cheques.
21
Spl. Case No.12/2008
190. Ext.208 Certified copy of ledger.191. Ext.209 Certified copy of ledger statement.192. Ext.210 Application form.193. Ext.211 Agreement.194. Ext.212 to 214 Non judicial stamp papers.195. Ext.215 Hypothecation.196. Ext.216 Letter of consent.197. Ext.217 Balance confirmation certificate.198. Ext.218 Guarantor’s statement.199. Ext.219 Guarantor’s agreement.200. Ext.220 Letter of consent.201. Ext.221 Balance confirmation certificate.202. Ext.222 Ledger Folio.203. Ext.223 Certified copy of loan ledger.204. Ext.224 Application form.205. Ext.225 Agreement.206. Ext.226 & 227 Non judicial stamp papers.207. Ext.228 Hypothecation.208. Ext.229 Guarantor’s agreement.209. Ext.230 to 232 Non judicial stamp papers.210. Ext.233 Letter of consent.211. Ext.234 Balance confirmation certificate.212. Ext.235 Guarantor’s statement.213. Ext.236 Letter of consent.214. Ext.237 Balance confirmation certificate.215. Ext.238 Certified copy of ledger folio.216. Ext.239 Certified copy of loan ledger folio.217. Ext.240 Application form.218. Ext.241 Agreement.219. Ext.242 Hypothecation.220. Ext.243 Letter of consent.221. Ext.244 Balance confirmation certificate.222. Ext.245 Guarantor’s statement.223. Ext.246 Guarantor’s agreement.224. Ext.247 & 249 Non judicial stamp papers.225. Ext.250 Letter of consent.226. Ext.251 Balance confirmation certificate.227. Ext.252 Certified copy of ledger folio.228. Ext.253 Certified copy of loan ledger folio.229. Ext.254 Application form.230. Ext.255 Agreement.231. Ext.256 Hypothecation.232. Ext.257 Letter of consent.233. Ext.258 Balance confirmation certificate.234. Ext.259 Guarantor’s statement.235. Ext.260 Balance confirmation certificate.236. Ext.261 Agreement.237. Ext.262 Letter of consent.238. Ext.263 Certified copy of ledger folio.
22
Spl. Case No.12/2008
239. Ext.264 Certified copy of loan ledger folio.240. Ext.265 Application form.241. Ext.266 Agreement.242. Ext.267 Hypothecation.243. Ext.268 Letter of consent.244. Ext.269 Balance confirmation certificate.245. Ext.270 to 272 Non judicial stamp papers.246. Ext.273 Guarantor’s statement.247. Ext.274 Letter of consent.248. Ext.275 Blank balance confirmation certificate.249. Ext.276 to 291 Seizure memos.250. Ext.292 Charge sheet.251. Document A Letter dt.23.3.2010.252. Document PY Service Record.253. Document B Account opening form.254. Document Z Letter255. Document ZZ Reasons for opinion.
List of Defence Exhibits :
Sl. No. Exhibit No. Nature of Documents
1. Ext. C to Ext. E Certificates issued by Tuleswar Nath. 2. Ext. F Identity Card3. Ext. F/1 Certificate.4. Ext. G to P Voter lists.5. Ext.Q Bank statement.6. Ext.R Compromise letter.
Special Judge, CBIAssam, Guwahati