in-use, on-board measurement of particulate matter … on-board measurement of particulate matter...
TRANSCRIPT
In-Use, On-board Measurement ofParticulate Matter Mass Emissions
Mridul Gautam, PhD
Professor
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
West Virginia University
REAL-TIME PARTICULATE MASS MONITOR MARI RPM-100
QUARTZ CRYSTAL MICROBALANCE
REAL-TIME PARTICULATE MASS MONITOR MARI RPM-100
SAMPLE CONDITIONING SYSTEM
REAL-TIME PARTICULATE MASS MONITOR MARI RPM-100
QUARTZ CRYSTAL MICROBALANCE
CAN Network Communication & RS 232; GPS Receiver RS 232
Sample Conditioning SystemMARI SCS 110
Venturi
NeedlePrimary Transport Tube
Minor Flow Major Flow
Sample Exhaust
Needle Pressure Drop
Secondary Transport Tube
Diluted SampleSample
Primary Mixing Chamber Secondary Mixing
Concept
Crystal Surfaces
Point to Plane Precipitator
Quartz Crystal Microbalance
• 0.454Hz/ng• Conc. Range
– 0-1000 µµ gm-3• Accuracy
– Better than 10%• Data-logging interval
– <1 second
Continuous TPM Measured withMARI RPM-100
TPM Trace vs. Power: FTP Cycle
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Time(s)
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n (
ug
/m3)
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
Po
wer
(hp
)
TPM Trace with MARI RPM 100 over aTransient Cycle
Transient Development Cycle
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00
Time (s)
Par
ticl
oe
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n (
ug
/m3)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Sp
eed
, Po
wer
, To
rqu
e
QCM Conc (ug/m3)TorquePower
Speed
TPM Trace from TEOM Model 1105 andMARI RPM 100
TEOM / QCM intercomparision
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00
Time (s)
Par
ticl
e C
on
cen
trat
ion
(u
g/m
3)
QCM Conc (ug/m3)
TEOM Conc (ug/m3)
TPM Trace over the Transient Portion ofthe Engine Cycle
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
700.00 710.00 720.00 730.00 740.00 750.00 760.00 770.00 780.00 790.00 800.00
0
50
100
150
200
250
conc 10 sec
conc 2 secs
Speed
Torque
Power
RPM 100 Parameters
-2000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
18:50:00 18:57:12 19:04:24 19:11:36 19:18:48
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
frequency
concentration
coronoa current
flow
Caterpillar D11 Track-type Tractor with a3508 V-8 Engine Operating at a Strip Mine
in WV
Caterpillar D11 Dozer with a 3508 V-8Engine Operating at a Strip Mine in WV
MEMS & RPM 100
MEMS and RPM 100 on a CAT D11Dozer with a 3508 V-8 Engine
MEMS
RPM 100
Annubar®
RPM-100 Packaged for the In-fieldEmissions Measurement from a Track-
type Tractor
Sample Conditioning System
Quartz CrystalMicrobalance
12 VDC Pumps
12VDC Power Supply
RPM-100 (QCM) in a Backpack
Raw Exhaust FlowrateMeasurement/Sampling Section
Annubar™
Engine Speed and Power Data Collected byCaterpillar during Track-type Tractor Transport
0.0
500.0
1000.0
1500.0
2000.0
2500.0
0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 300.0 350.0 400.0
Time (s)
En
gin
e S
pee
d (
rpm
)
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Pow
er (k
W)
Engine Speed
Power (kW)
CO2 Mass vs. Time for the First Track-typeTractor Test (Full Cycle)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 500 1000 1500 2000
Time (sec)
CO
2 E
mis
sion
s (g
/sec
)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
En
gin
e S
pee
d (
rpm
)
CO2
Engine Speed
Integrated Result76061.9 g/cycle
Dynamometer Test Cycle Designed to Evaluatethe On-board Emissions Testing System in the
Laboratory
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Time (s)
En
gin
e S
pee
d (
rpm
)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
En
gin
e O
utp
ut
(kW
an
d N
-m)
Engine Speed
Engine Load (N-m)
Engine Power (kW)
Comparison of Mass Emissions Rates of NOxover a Transient Cycle Designed to Mimic In-
field Dozer Operation – MEMS Results andLaboratory Results
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Time (sec)
NO
x (g
/sec
)
020702-07 MEMS NOx
020702-07 Lab NOx
Integrated ValueMEMS: 284.1 gLab: 262.7 gPercent Error: 8.1%
Comparison of Mass Emissions Rates of CO2over a Transient Cycle Designed to Mimic In-fieldDozer Operation – MEMS Results and Laboratory
Results
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Time (sec)
CO
2 (
g/s
ec)
020702-05 MEMS CO2
020702-05 Lab CO2
Integrated ValueMEMS: 44234.3 gLab: 4238.8 gPercent Error: 4.5%
Dilution Ratio (Using the RPM-100)and CO2 Mass Emissions Rate
MY 2000, DDC Series 60 on an EngineDynamometer
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Time (s)
Dilu
tion
Rat
io
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
CO
2 (g/
s)
Dilution Ratio
CO2
Continuous PM Mass Emissions Measurementwith the RPM-100
MY 2000, DDC Series 60 on an EngineDynamometer
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Time (s)
PM
Mas
s (g
x10
-6)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
PM
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n (m
g/m
3 )
Mass Concentration
Gravimetric PM ComparisonsBetween the MARI RPM-100 and
the Full-flow Dilution Tunnel
Test 01 Test 02 Test 03
MARI RPM 100 Integrated PM Mass 0.74 1.97 1.73 Full-Flow Dilution Tunnel Gravimetric
Integrated PM Mass 0.71 1.75 1.79
Percent Difference 4.2% 12.6% -3.4%
Note: The RPM-100 sampled from the raw exhaust stream.The resultant error includes all sources of errors inthe emissions measurement systems (exhaust flow
rate; concentration; data acquisition; etc.)
NOx Mass vs. Time for a Track-type Tractor Test
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Time (sec)
NO
x E
mis
sio
ns
(g/s
ec)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
En
gin
e S
pee
d (r
pm
)
NOxEngine Speed
Integrated Result67.7 g/cycle
NOx and PM Concentration Data for theFirst Track-type Tractor Test
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Time (s)
NO
x (g
/s)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
PM
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n (
mg
/m3)
Raw Mass-01
RPM100 PM Concentration
NOX (g/s)
Integrated Nox Result67.7 g/cycleIntegrated PM Mass Result0.349 g/cycle
Chase Studies
Particulate Exhaust Chase StudyDiesel and GDI Vehicles
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
13:00:00 13:30:00 14:00:00 14:30:00 15:00:00
Time
Par
ticl
e C
on
cen
trat
ion
(µg
/m3)
1
2
3
4 5
67
8
9
10
11
12Key3 Circuit with no car in front (background)4,5 Following GDI, slow, large separation6,7 Following GDI, slow, closer than 4,58,9,10 Following Diesel at increasing speeds11,12 Following GDI, Fast, Close
Chase Studies
Chase Studies
West Virginia University,Morgantown,WV 26506