in-vitro antioxidant activity of different fraction of roots of cassia auriculata linn
TRANSCRIPT
ww.sciencedirect.com
d r u g i n v e n t i o n t o d a y 5 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1 6 4e1 6 8
Available online at w
journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/locate/di t
Short Communication
In-vitro antioxidant activity of different fractionof roots of Cassia auriculata Linn.
Supriya Deshpande, Shailesh M. Kewatkar*, Vivek V. Paithankar
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Bhagwant University, Ajmer 305004, Rajasthan, India
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 7 February 2013
Accepted 28 May 2013
Keywords:
Antioxidant
Cassia auriculata Linn.
Flavonoids
DPPH
Indian traditional medicines
* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ91 9303649756E-mail address: kewatkar.shailesh@gmai
0975-7619/$ e see front matter Copyright ªhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dit.2013.05.006
a b s t r a c t
The aim of this work was to estimate the total phenolic and flavonoid content, and to
evaluate in-vitro antioxidant activity of flavonoids rich extract of Cassia auriculata Linn.
(CAF) saponins rich extract of C. auriculata Linn. (CAS) which belongs to the family Cae-
salpiniaceae. Total phenolic content in CAF was found to be 67.32 mg/mg of extract
calculated as gallic acid equivalent (r2 ¼ 0.976) and total flavonoids compound was found to
be 31 mg/mg of extract calculated as rutin equivalent (r2 ¼ 0.985). The extract was screened
for its potential antioxidant activities using tests such as DPPH free radical scavenging
activity, reducing power activity, and hydrogen peroxide-scavenging activity. The in-vitro
antioxidant assay showed that both CAF as well as CAS posses antioxidant activity. So C.
auriculata Linn. could be useful for preparation of neutraceuticals as potent antioxidants, to
treat various human diseases and its complications.
Copyright ª 2013, JPR Solutions; Published by Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. All rights
reserved.
1. Introduction The healing potential of many plants have been utilized by
Antioxidant compounds in food play an important role as a
health protecting factor. Primary sources of naturally occur-
ring antioxidants are whole grains, fruits and vegetables. The
main characteristic of an antioxidant is its ability to trap free
radicals. Highly reactive free radicals and oxygen species can
initiate degenerative diseases. Antioxidant compounds like
phenolic acids, polyphenols and flavonoids are commonly
found in plants have been reported to havemultiple biological
effects, including antioxidant activity.1 Currently, the possible
toxicity of synthetic antioxidants has been criticized. Thus
interest in natural antioxidant, especially of plant origin has
greatly increased in recent years.2
.l.com (S.M. Kewatkar).2013, JPR Solutions; Publi
Indian traditional medicines like Siddha, Ayurvedha and
Unani. Being nontoxic and easily affordable, there has been
resurgence in the consumption and demand for medicinal
plants.3 Cassia auriculata Linn. commonly known as tanners
cassia, also known as “avaram” in Tamil language is a shrub
belongs to the Caesalpiniaceae family. The shrub is specially
famous for its attractive yellow flowers which are used in the
treatment of skin disorders and body odour. It is widely used
in traditional medicine for rheumatism, conjunctivitis and
diabetes. It has many medicinal properties. Its bark is used as
an astringent, leaves and fruits anthelminthic, seeds used to
treat in eye troubles and root employed in skin diseases.4 It is
also used for the treatment of ulcers, leprosy and liver
shed by Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.
d ru g i n v e n t i o n t od a y 5 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1 6 4e1 6 8 165
diseases.5 The antidiabetic, hypolipidemic6 and antioxidant7
and hepatoprotective8 effect of C. auriculata Linn. have been
reported. It was also observed that flower and leaf extract of C.
auriculata Linn. shown to have antipyretic activity.9 The roots
contain a flavones glycoside, 70,40-dihydroxyflavone-5-O-b-D-
galactopyranoside.10 C. auriculata Linn. contains several active
constituents such as flavonoids, b-sitosterol-a-d-glucoside,
polysaccharides, anthracene, dimeric procyanidins and myr-
istyl alcohol that are known to have scavenging activities
against free radicals.11 Roots of C. auriculata are reported to
contain flavonoids, polysaccharides, tannins, and saponins,
among other components which may contribute to its diverse
uses in folklore medicine.12
The aim of the present study was to determine the anti-
oxidant potential of two different fractions of the root of the
plant i.e. flavonoids rich extract of C. auriculata Linn. (CAF)
saponins rich extract of C. auriculata Linn. (CAS) which is
having traditional claims for several diseases.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Procurement and authentication of plant
The root of the plant C. auriculata Linn. was collected from
fields of Walgaon Road, Amravati, Maharashtra and in-
teriors of Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh respectively. The plant
has been authenticated by Safia College of Science, Peer
Gate, Bhopal, (Madhya Pradesh), and were given the voucher
specimen number 159/Bot/Safia/2010. The authenticated
roots were dried under shade and then coarsely powdered
with the help of mechanical grinder. The powdered was
passed through sieve no. 40 and stored in an airtight conta-
iner for extraction.
2.2. Preparation of flavonoids rich extract of Cassiaauriculata Linn. (CAF)
Extraction of the powdered roots of the plant was carried out
with the help of water by decoction method.13 Special care
was taken while decoction process regarding temperature
that it should not exceeding more than 40 �C � 5 �C as it may
cause the precipitation or crystallization of some phytocon-
stituents which will never solubalised into any solvents in
further process. Then this aqueous extract was filtered and
alcohol (Ethanol) was added slowly into this aqueous liquid
extract to precipitate out polysaccharides which are present
into the roots of individual plant.
Then the solution was filtered and obtained filtrate was
evaporated to 1/4th of the total volume. After evaporating 1/
4th of the total volume of the solution, it was successively
extracted with equal amount of ethyl acetate with the help of
separating funnel to get separate fraction of ethyl acetate
fraction of the roots of the plant. Then the ethyl acetate
extract was acidified with 0.1 N HCL to increase the yield of
extract. Then this ethyl acetate fraction of root of the plant
was evaporated to get precipitate which is then dissolved in
methanol and evaporated slowly to get crystalline powder of
flavonoids.
2.3. Preparation of saponins rich extract of C. auriculataLinn. (CAS)
Same plant materials were used for getting saponins rich
fraction.14 Pulverized plant materials was treated with
ethanol: water (70:30) for maceration till seven days after
defattingwith petroleumether (40:60). Mixturewas agitated at
regular interval in this period. Obtained extract after filtration
with muslin cloth followed by filter paper was concentrated
using rotary vacuum evaporator (40 �C), precaution was kept
that extract do not get powdered. Concentrated extract was
further treated with n-butanol to get n-butanol soluble frac-
tion. n-Butanol soluble fraction was further treated with
chilled diethyl ether. After treating with chilled diethyl ether,
precipitates were formed. This mixture with precipitate was
kept at �20 �C for 24 h. Precipitates were further separated by
centrifugation. These precipitate were further dissolved in
methanol and methanol was evaporated slowly, to get crys-
talline powder.
Powder was further investigated for presence/absence of
various phytoconstituents. It was observed hat powder gave
positive results for froath test and haemolysis test, which
ascertained presence of saponins in powder.
2.4. Total phenolics content
The total phenols of all extracts were measured at 765 nm by
Folin Ciocalteu reagent.15 Each dilute fraction of the plant i.e.
CAF/CAS (0.5 ml of 1:10 g/ml) or gallic acid (standard phenolic
compound) wasmixed with Folin Ciocalteu reagent (5 ml, 1:10
diluted with distilled water) and aqueous sodium carbonate
(4 ml, 1 M). The mixture was allowed to stand for 15 min and
the total phenols were determined by spectrophotometer at
765 nm. The standard curve was prepared using 10, 20, 30, 40
and 50 mg/ml solutions of gallic acid inmethanol: water (50:50,
v/v). Total phenol values are expressed in terms of gallic acid
equivalent (mg/g of dry mass), which is a common reference
compound.
2.5. Total flavonoid content
An aliquot of diluted sample (1 mg/ml) or standard solution of
rutin was added to a 75 ml of NaNO2 solution, and mixed for
6 min, before adding 0.15 ml AlCl3 (100 g/L).16 After 5 min,
0.5 ml of NaOH was added. The final volume was adjusted to
2.5 ml with distilled water and thoroughly mixed. Absorbance
of the mixture was determined at 510 nm against the same
mixture, without the sample, as a blank. Total flavonoid
content was expressed as mg rutin/g dry weight, through the
calibration curve of rutin (10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 mg/ml). All
samples were analysed in three replications.
2.6. DPPH free radical scavenging activity
Different concentration of plant extract was prepared.17 Af-
terwards these dilutions were mixed with 0.5 ml DPPH solu-
tion (4 mg in 100 ml methanol) and incubated for 30 min at
room temperature in dark condition. After incubation the
absorbance was noted at 517 nm using methanol as a blank.
Percentage inhibition was calculated using following
Fig. 1 e Standard curve of gallic acid.
d r u g i n v e n t i o n t o d a y 5 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1 6 4e1 6 8166
formulae Inhibition % ¼ (1 � A1/A0) � 100. Where A1 is the
absorbance in the presence of plant extract or positive con-
trols, while A0 is the absorbance in the absence of plant
extract and positive controls.
2.7. Hydrogen peroxide-scavenging assay
A solution of hydrogen peroxide (40 mM) was prepared in
phosphate buffer (pH 7.4).18 Hydrogen peroxide concentration
was determined spectrophotometrically from absorption at
230 nm in a spectrophotometer. Various concentration of plant
extract which were prepared in of 40 mM phosphate buffer sa-
line of (PH 7.4), which were added to 2 ml of hydrogen peroxide
solution. Absorbance of hydrogen peroxide at 230 nm was
determined after 10 min against a blank solution containing
phosphate buffer without hydrogen peroxide. Percentage inhi-
bition was calculated using following formulae Inhibition
%¼ (1�A1/A0)�100.Where,A1 is theabsorbance inthepresence
ofplantextractorpositive controls,whileA0 is theabsorbance in
the absence of plant extract and positive controls.
2.8. Reducing power assay
Extracts were prepared in different concentrations and 1ml of
each in distilled water were mixed with phosphate buffer
(2.5 ml, 2 M, pH 6.6) and potassium ferricyanide (2.5 ml, 1%);
the mixture was incubated at 50 �C for 20 min.19 A portion
(2.5 ml) of trichloroacetic acid (TCA, 10%) was added to the
mixture which was then centrifuged at 1500 RPM for 10 min.
The upper layer of solution (2.5 ml) was mixed with distilled
water (2.5ml) and FeCl3 (0.5ml, 0.1%), and the absorbancewas
measured at 700 nm. Increased absorbance of the reaction
mixture indicated increased reducing power.
Fig. 2 e Standard curve of rutin.
3. Results and discussion
Free radical is a molecule with an unpaired electron and is
involved in bacterial and parasitic infections, lung damage,
inflammation, reperfusion injury, cardiovascular disorders,
atherosclerosis, ageing and neoplastic diseases.20 They are
also involved in autoimmune disorder like rheumatoid
arthritis etc.21 Our results demonstrated that the both the
fractions of root of C. auriculata Linn. possess free radical
scavenging activity in-vitro models like DPPH�, Hydrogen
peroxide-scavenging and reducing power activity.
3.1. Total phenolics content
Phenolic compounds are known as powerful chain breaking
antioxidant22 and they are very important plant constituents
because of their scavenging ability, which is due to their hy-
droxyl groups.23 In CAF, the total phenolic content was found
to be 67.32 mg/mg in terms of gallic acid equivalent. Standard
curve of gallic acid is shown in Fig. 1.
3.2. Total flavonoids content
Flavonoids are a group of polyphenolic compounds, which
exhibit several biological effects such as anti-inflammatory,
anti-hepatotoxic, anti-ulcer, anti-allergic, anti-viral and anti-
cancer activities.24 They are capable of effectively scav-
enging the reactive O2 species because of their phenolic hy-
droxyl groups and so they are potent antioxidants also.25 The
total flavonoids content of CAFwas determined to be 31 mg/mg
in terms of rutin equivalent. Standard curve of rutin is shown
in Fig. 2
3.3. DPPH free radical scavenging activity
DPPH� is one of the free radicals widely used for testing pre-
liminary radical scavenging activity of the plant extract,
which is based on the ability of DPPH�, a stable free radical, to
decolorize in the presence of antioxidants, is a direct and
reliable method for determining radical scavenging action.26
The DPPH� assay has been largely used as a quick, reliable
and reproducible parameter to search the in-vitro general
antioxidant activity of pure compounds as well as plant ex-
tracts.27 The reducing capacity of compounds could serve as
indicator of potential antioxidant property.
In the present study, the percentage of scavenging effect
on the DPPH� radical was concomitantly increased with the
increase in the concentration of both CAF and CAS from 10 to
100 mg/ml and 100 to 1000 mg/ml. The percentage of inhibition
existed from 21.46 at 10 mg/ml to 72.5 at 100 mg/ml for CAF and
for CAS; they were 6.45 at 100 mg/ml and 69.37 at 1000 mg/ml
Table 1 e DPPH free radical scavenging activity of CAFand CAS.
CAF CAS
Sr.no.
Conc(mg/ml)
%Inhibition
IC50 Sr.no.
Conc(mg/ml)
%Inhibition
IC50
1 10 21.46 60.977 1 100 6.45 707.930
2 20 28.67 2 200 12.46
3 40 32.25 3 400 26.375
4 60 48.56 4 600 46
5 80 64.24 5 800 57.62
6 100 72.5 6 1000 69.37
Table 3 e Reducing power assay of CAF and CAS.
CAF CAS
S. no. Conc.(mg/ml)
Absorbance S. no. Conc.(mg/ml)
Absorbance
1 10 0.092 1 10 0.064
2 20 0.129 2 20 0.097
3 40 0.213 3 40 0.168
4 60 0.278 4 60 0.191
5 80 0.342 5 80 0.293
6 100 0.388 6 100 0.318
d ru g i n v e n t i o n t od a y 5 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1 6 4e1 6 8 167
(Table 1). From the results it is known that the species, C.
auriculata Linn. possess hydrogen donating capabilities and
does scavenging free radicals. Furthermore, it was noticed
that the CAF has more pronounced scavenging activity than
that of the CAS.
3.4. Hydrogen peroxide-scavenging assay
Hydrogen peroxide is generated in vivo by several oxidase
enzymes. In this method, when an antioxidant is incubated
with hydrogen peroxide, the decay or loss of hydrogen
peroxide is measured spectrophotometrically.28 Hydrogen
peroxide is a weak oxidizing agent which inactivates enzymes
by oxidation of the essential thiol (SHe) groups. It rapidly
transverses cell membranes and once inside the cell interior,
interacts with Fe2þ and Cu2þ to form hydroxyl radicals, which
is harmful to the cell.29 The extracts showed good scavenging
effects with IC50 values 52.249 mg/ml and 956.584 mg/ml for CAF
and CAS respectively (Table 2). The composition of hydrogen
peroxide into water may occur according to the antioxidant
compounds, as the antioxidant component present in the
extract are good electron donors, they may accelerate the
conversion of H2O2 to H2O.
3.5. Reducing power assay
Reducing power activity is often used to evaluate the ability of
natural antioxidant to donate electron.30,31 Many reports have
revealed that there is a direct correlation between antioxidant
activities and reducing power of certain plant extracts.32,33
The reducing power activity of CAF and CAS increased
consistently with the increase in the volume of extract from
Table 2 e Hydrogen peroxide- scavenging assay of CAFand CAS.
CAF CAS
Sr.no.
Conc(mg/ml)
%Inhibition
IC50 Sr.no.
Conc(mg/ml)
%Inhibition
IC50
1 10 24.7 52.249 1 100 4.22 956.584
2 20 29.57 2 200 9.86
3 40 34.66 3 400 23.52
4 60 49.21 4 600 29.65
5 80 78.25 5 800 41.22
6 100 81.5 6 1000 54.28
10 mg/ml to 100 mg/ml. When compared with the CAS, CAF
showed higher absorbance. It is known further that the
reducing power activity of CAF was due to the presence of
phenolic compound such as flavonoids (Table 3).
4. Conclusion
Searching plant sources may bring new natural products into
pharmaceutical, cosmetic and food production. An in-vitro
antioxidant study provides scientific evidence to prove the
traditional claims to the member of cassia species, On the
basis of the results obtained in the present study, it was
concluded that the CAF and CAS possess significant antioxi-
dant activity. Presence of adequate amount of phenol, flavo-
noids and saponins compounds may account for this fact. So
these findings of present study suggest that this plant have a
potential source of natural antioxidant. Further studies are
warranted for the isolation and characterization of antioxi-
dant compounds, and also in vivo studies are needed for un-
derstanding their mechanism of action as antioxidants.
Conflicts of interest
All authors have none to declare.
Acknowledgements
Authors are thankful to Mr. Manvendra Singh Karchuli
(Research Associate) and Director, Safia College of Science,
Bhopal for their support and help for the completion of this
research work.
r e f e r e n c e s
1. Brown JE, Rice-Evans CA. Luteolin-rich artichoke extractprotect low density lipoprotein from oxidation in vitro. FreeRadic Res. 1998;29:247e255.
2. Jayaprakash GK, Rao LJ. Phenolic constituents from lichenParmontrema stuppeum. Food Control. 2000;56:1018e1022.
3. Jayashree A, Maneemegalai S. Studies on the antibacterialactivity of the extracts from Tridax procumbens L and Ixoracoccinea L. Biomedicine. 2008;28:190e194.
4. Siva R, Krishnamurthy KV. Isozyme diversity in Cassiaauriculata L. African J Biotechnol. 2005;4:772e775.
d r u g i n v e n t i o n t o d a y 5 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1 6 4e1 6 8168
5. Kumar RS, Ponmozhi M, Nalini M. Effect of Cassia auriculataleaf extract on lipids in rats with alcoholic liver injury. AsiaPac J Clin Nutr. 2002;11:157e163.
6. Umadevi P, Selvi S, Suja S, Selvam K, Chinnaswamy P.Antidiabetic and hypolipidemic effect of Cassia auriculata inalloxan induced diabetic rats. Int J Pharm. 2006;2:601e607.
7. Kumaran A, Joel Karunakaran R. Antioxidant activity of Cassiaauriculata flowers. Fitoterapia. 2007;78:46e47.
8. Kumar RS, Ponmozhi M, Viswanathan P, Nalini N. Activity ofCassia auriculata leaf extract in rats with alcoholic liver injury.J Nutr Biochem. 2003;14:452e458.
9. Vedavathy S, Rao KN. Antipyretic activity of six indigenousmedicinal plants of Tirumala hills. J Ethnopharmacol.1991;33:193e196.
10. Wealth of India. India: NISCAIR, CSIR; 2007. 1: [A-Ci], 222e224.11. Vijayaraj P, Muthukumar K, Sabarirajan J, Nachiappan V.
Antihyperlipidemic activity of Cassia auriculata flowers intritonWR 1339 induced hyperlipidemic rats. Exp Toxicol Pathol.2013;65:135e141.
12. Anniea S, Rajagopala PL, Malini S. Effect of Cassia auriculataLinn. Root extract on cisplatin and gentamicin-induced renalinjury. Phytomedicine. 2005;12:555e560.
13. AleMeshal IA, Tariq M, Parmar NS, Ageel AM. Anti-inflammatory activity of the flavonoids fraction of khat (Cathaedulis Forsk). Agents Actions. 1985;17:3e4.
14. Cabrini DA, Castardo JC, Prudente AS, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of hydroalcoholic extract and twobiflavonoids from Garcinia gardneriana leaves in mouse pawoedema. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008;118:405e411.
15. McDonald S, Prenzler PD, Autolovich M, Robards K. Phenoliccontent and antioxidant activity of olive extracts. Food Chem.2001;73:73e84.
16. Zengin G, Aktumsek A, Guler GO, Cakmak YS, Yildiztugay E.Antioxidant properties of methanolic extract and fatty acidcomposition of Centaurea urvillei DC. subsp. HayekianaWagenitz. Rec Nat Prod. 2011;5:123e132.
17. Zhang Z, Liao L, Moore J, Wu T, Wang Z. Antioxidant phenoliccompounds from walnut kernels (Juglans regia L.). Food Chem.2009;113:160e165.
18. Jayaprakasha GK, Rao LJ, Sakariah KK. Antioxidant activitiesof flavidin in different in vitro model systems. Bioorg MedChem. 2004;12:5141e5146.
19. Ghaisas MM, Navghare VV, Takawale AR, Zope VS,Deshpande AD. In-vitro antioxidant activity of Tectona grandisLinn. Pharmacology. 2008;3:296e305.
20. Roy H, Burdon. Free Radical Damage and Its Control.Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V; 1994.
21. Rao MS, Raman MV. Biochem Syst Ecol. 2004;32:447e448.22. Shahidi F, Wanasundara PKJPD. Phenolic antioxidants. Food
Sci Nut. 1992;32:67e103.23. Hatano T, Edamatsu R, Mori A. Effect of interaction of tannins
and related poyphenols on superoxide anion radical and onDPPH radical. Chem Pharm Bull. 1989;37:2016e2021.
24. Umamaheswari Chatterjee TK. In vitro antioxidant activitiesof the fractions of Coccinia grandis L. leaf extract. Afr J TradComp Alt Med. 2008;5:61e73.
25. Cao G, Sofic E, Prior RL. Antioxidant and pro-oxidativebehavior of flavonoids: structure activity relationships. FreeRadic Biol Med. 1997;22:749e760.
26. Raquibul Hasan SM, Mokarram Hossain MD, Raushanara A,Mariam J, Ehsanul Hoque Mazumder MD, Rahman Shafiqur.DPPH free radical scavenging activity of some Bangladeshmedicinal plants. Full Length Res Paper. 2009;3:875e879.
27. Koleva II, Van Beek TA, Linssen JPH, de G root A,Evstatieva LN. Screening of plant extracts for antioxidantactivity: a comparative study on three testing methods.Phytochem Anal. 2002;13:8e17.
28. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, RiceEvans C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTSradical cation decolorization. Free Radic Biol Med.1999;26:1231e1237.
29. Contreras-Guzman ES, Strong FC. Determination oftocopherols (vitamin E) by reduction of cupric ion. J Assoc AnalChem. 1982;65:1215e1221.
30. Yildirim A, Mavi A, Oktay M, Kara AA, Algur OF, Bilaloglu V.Comparison of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of tilia(Tilia arentea Desf. Ex. D.C.) sage (Salvia triloba L.) and black tea(Camellia sinensis L.) extracts. J Agric Food Chem.2000;48:5030e5034.
31. Dorman HJD, Peltoketo A, Hiltunen R, Tikkanen MJ.Characterisation of the antioxidant properties ofdeodourisation aqueous extracts from selected LamiaceaeHerbs. Food Chem. 2003;83:255e256.
32. Duh PD. Antioxidant activity of burdock (Arctium lappaLinne.): Its scavenging effect on free-radical and activeoxygen. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1998;75:455e461.
33. Duh PD, Du PC, Yen GC. Action of methanolic extract ofmung beans hulls as inhibitors of lipid peroxidation andnon-lipid oxidative damage. Food Chem Toxicol. 1999;37:1055e1061.