incarcerated rectal prolapse

20
Strangulated Rectal Prolapse a Strangulated Rectal Prolapse a Rare Therapeutic Challenge Y Khromov J Sayfan Y. Khromov, J. Sayfan Department of Surgery A Haemek Medical Center 1

Upload: doancong

Post on 14-Feb-2017

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

Strangulated Rectal Prolapse – aStrangulated Rectal Prolapse a Rare Therapeutic Challenge

Y Khromov J SayfanY. Khromov, J. Sayfan

Department of Surgery A ep e o Su ge yHaemek Medical Center

1

Page 2: Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

Case reportCase report

• A 37- year-old man presented to the emergency department with a largeirreducible full thickness rectal prolapse of 4 hours durationirreducible full thickness rectal prolapse of 4 hours duration.

• No previous history of prolapse was reported.

• His prior medical history included severe mental retardation treated with multiple medications.

• On clinical examination, the patient had a normal temperature and washemodynamically stable.

• His abdomen was soft with mild tenderness in the lower abdomen.Bowel sounds were present. The laboratory investigations showed mildleucocytosis with left shift.

• On rectal examination the prolapsed rectum appeared congested andoedematous, but viable.

2

Page 3: Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

On admission ‐ before trial of reduction

3

Page 4: Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

C i dCase report ‐ continued

• Initial attempts to reduce the prolapse were unsuccessful due to severepain. In consequence - reduction under general anesthesia was tried, butproved futileproved futile.

• As the prolapsed and strangulated bowel was not obviously necrotic,conservative measures were now applied: sedation muscle relaxantsconservative measures were now applied: sedation, muscle relaxantsand Sol. MgSO4 10% compresses (to reduce edema).

• Unfortunately, all these efforts proved ineffective and ischemic changesUnfortunately, all these efforts proved ineffective and ischemic changesof the mucosa progressively appeared. Therefore, patient was taken tothe operating room after four days of attempted conservative treatment.

4

Page 5: Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse( view before surgery )( view before surgery )

5

Page 6: Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

The Altemeier procedure ( perineal proctosigmoidectomy )

•   Advantages of Altemeier procedure

O  May be performed in young and healthy patients as well as frail and elderlypatients because of its low morbidity

O  In young women who wish to avoid the potential hazard of infertility as a result ofadhesion formation, the Altemeier procedure may be warranted, even though it isassociated with a higher recurrence rate than abdominal procedures

O I h i k f i d i hO  In young men, the risk of autonomic nerve damage with consequent sexual  dysfunction, may be avoided by a perineal repair.

O Th Al i d i l h d f h iO  The Altemeier procedure is also the procedure of choicewhen the prolapsed rectum is irreducible or incarcerated.

6

Page 7: Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

The Operationp

7

Page 8: Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

Incarcerated Rectal ProlapseIncarcerated Rectal Prolapse( mobilized recto-sigmoid)

8

Page 9: Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse( the resected specimen)

9

Page 10: Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

Incarcerated Rectal Prolapsep( hand sewn one - layer coloanal anastomosis))

10

Page 11: Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

Perineal Rectosigmoidectomy( final result )

11

Page 12: Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

Protective Brooke’s Loop Ileostomyp y

12

Page 13: Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

Follow upFollow up

• The patient’s postoperative course was quite uneventful.

• Five weeks later , the patient was readmitted for ileostomy closure(f ll i t t t d t l t th t i d l t(following contrast study to evaluate the anastomosis and rule outobstruction distal to the stoma).

Since then the patient remains ell• Since then - the patient remains well.

13

Page 14: Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

Strangulated Rectal Prolapse( Di i 1 )( Discussion 1 )

• Rectal prolapse is thought to be a true intussusception that progresses over timeto full thickness protrusion of the rectal wall through the anal orifice.

• Incarceration with strangulation of an acute rectal prolapse is a rather unusualentity that represents a surgical emergency.

• The peak age of incidence is the seventh decade in women, whereas the relatively few men who have this problem may develop prolapse at the age 40or less.

O t iki h t i ti f ti t i th i i d t d t• One striking characteristic of younger patients is their increased tendency  tohave autism, syndromes associated with developmental delay, and psychiatriccomorbidities requiring multiple medications.

• Patients with primary or “ acute “ prolapse following a diarrhea episode mayhave competent sphincter which precipitates edema, incarceration and strangulation of the prolapsed segmentstrangulation of the prolapsed segment.

14

Page 15: Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

Strangulated Rectal Prolapse( Discussion 2 )

• Current repair strategies for non complicated rectal prolapse are broadly• Current repair strategies for non‐complicated rectal prolapse are broadlycategorized as either abdominal or perineal.

• Clinical experience as reflected the literature indicate that surgery• Clinical experience as reflected the literature indicate that surgeryshould be performed early in irreducible prolapse.

• Optimal treatment for strangulated rectal prolapse is controversial –Optimal treatment for strangulated rectal prolapse is controversialreports of therapy are scant and difficult to evaluate.

• Conservative management aims to reduce the edema and allow reductionConservative management aims to reduce the edema and allow reductionof the prolapsed rectum with later planned definitive surgery.

• Edema may be reduced by solution of sugar, by injection of hyaluronidasey y g y j yor by applying an elastic compression wrap.

• Attempts of conservative management have low efficacy, cause delay,and do not prevent the need for a subsequent operation.

15

Page 16: Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

Strangulated Rectal Prolapse( Discussion 3 )

• There are two widely used perineal procedures the Delorme operation• There are two widely used perineal procedures: the Delorme operationand perineal rectosigmoidectomy ( Altemeier operation ). 

• The advantage of perineal procedures is that laparotomy is avoided• The advantage of perineal procedures is that laparotomy is avoided,which is well suited  for high‐risk patients ( male patients;elderly frail patients with significant comorbidities;  patients with incarcerated strangulated or even gangrenous prolapsed rectalincarcerated, strangulated, or even gangrenous prolapsed rectalsegment ).

• Perineal proctosigmoidectomy was first described by Mikulicz in 1889. ThisPerineal proctosigmoidectomy was first described by Mikulic in 889. Thisprocedure was later performed by Miles in 1933 and Gabriel in 1948.Altemeier popularized this technique in 1971.

• Perineal rectosigmoidectomy involves full– thickness resectionof the rectum and sigmoid with a coloanal hand sewed or stapled anastomosis.  

16

Page 17: Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

Strangulated Rectal Prolapse( Discussion 4 )

• The main disadvantage of perineal proctosigmoidectomy is the highThe main disadvantage of perineal proctosigmoidectomy is the highrecurrence rate that varies from 5 % to 50% depending on the series.More recent studies refer to much lower rates ( 3% ‐ 16% ) when comparedto the abdominal approaches.pp

• The two major complications seen after an Altemeier procedure arej p panastomotic breakdown and bleeding. These can occur with either handsewn or stapled anastomosis.

• The literature fails to demonstrate superiority of stapled over hand sewntechnique in coloanal anastomosis.

• In our case, the Altemeier procedure was completed by divertingileostomy to protect the difficult hand sewn anastomosis.Due to extreme bowel edema, the surgeon considered the anastomosis

f

17

unsafe.

Page 18: Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

ConclusionsConclusions

Incarceration rarely complicates the full thicknessrectal prolapse necessitating emergency surgery.p p g g y g y

Emergency surgery in this situation, remainsa high - risk procedure and surgeons should befamiliar with the technique of Altemeier operationfor managing this challenging problem as it is thefor managing this challenging problem, as it is theonly option in this setup.

18

Page 19: Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

Happy End and Happy Operating Team

19

Page 20: Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse

Long term Follow up – Satisfied SurgeonLong‐term Follow up – Satisfied Surgeon

20