income determination

63
Income Determination • The aggregate spending model is designed to explain how the different sectors of the economy interact to determine the size and composition of GDP (Y). • The model is an equilibrium model. – Equilibrium is a state of rest where there are either no forces causing change or equal opposing forces.

Upload: darius-pitts

Post on 03-Jan-2016

32 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Income Determination. The aggregate spending model is designed to explain how the different sectors of the economy interact to determine the size and composition of GDP (Y). The model is an equilibrium model. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Income Determination

Income Determination

• The aggregate spending model is designed to explain how the different sectors of the economy interact to determine the size and composition of GDP (Y).

• The model is an equilibrium model.– Equilibrium is a state of rest where there are either

no forces causing change or equal opposing forces.

Page 2: Income Determination

Equilibrium

• Equilibrium is achieved in the model when aggregate spending or expenditures just equal aggregate supply or output.– Aggregate expenditures = Aggregate Supply

AE AS

Page 3: Income Determination

Aggregate Expenditures

• Aggregate expenditures are comprised of all spending done in the economy during a given period of time.– Aggregate expenditures are the sum of consumption

spending by the household sector, investment spending by businesses, government spending by all levels of government, and net exports.

• AE = C + I + G + (X-M)

Page 4: Income Determination

Aggregate Supply

• Aggregate supply is GDP. – It is all final goods and services produced during a

given period of time.

– AS = GDP or Y

• We will assume for now that aggregate supply is perfectly responsive to spending.– Whenever spending changes, aggregate supply

changes by an equal amount.• This is an example of a simplifying assumption. We use it to

eliminate supply-side problems so we can concentrate on the demand-side of the model, aggregate spending.

Page 5: Income Determination

Aggregate Supply

AE

Y

AS

0

B

D

E

According to the circular flow diagram andthe NIPA, GDP measured from the spending side equals GDP measured from the income side.

We use this relationship to draw the AS line.

Note that at point E, the distance 0B=0D=ED.Every point on the AS line represents someamount of GDP.

Page 6: Income Determination

Aggregate Supply

• We depict aggregate supply graphically with a ray from the origin.

• Every point on the ray represents GDP measured either from the expenditure side or from the income side.– GDP measured from the expenditure side is on

the vertical axis.– GDP measured from the income side is on the

horizontal axis. • The AS line in this model NEVER moves.

Page 7: Income Determination

Aggregate Expenditures

Page 8: Income Determination

Consumption Spending

• Consumption is defined as all spending done by the household sector on durables, non-durables, and services.

• Consumption is assumed to be determined primarily by disposable income (Yd), but it also may be affected by taxes, changes in the price level, and real wealth.

• Consumption spending is assumed to obey the absolute income hypothesis.

Page 9: Income Determination

Absolute Income Hypothesis

• The absolute income hypothesis says that consumption is directly related to income.

• As income rises, consumption rises but by a smaller amount. This means we can write:– C = a0 + bYd

• a0 is subsistence consumption. When Yd = 0, some positive consumption still occurs.

• The coefficient b is the marginal propensity to consume. It tells us by how much consumption changes when disposable income changes.

Page 10: Income Determination

Consumption Function

AE= C

Y0

Consumption

a0

/\Y

/\CAccording to the absolute incomehypothesis, consumption spending isdirectly related to disposable income.

The intercept of the consumption function,a0, represents subsistence consumption.

The slope of the consumption function,/\C//\Y, is called the marginal propensityto consume. The MPC shows by how muchconsumption changes as income changes.

Page 11: Income Determination

Practice

• Define the marginal propensity to consume.• What is the MPC when a change in income of 1000

causes a change in consumption of 900? What if a change in income of 1000 caused a change in consumption of 500?

• By how much and in what direction will consumption change given the following:– Income rises by $100 and the MPC is 0.8– Income falls by $250 and the MPC is 0.75– Income rises by $400 and the MPC is 0.9

Page 12: Income Determination

Saving

• Saving is defined as all saving done by the household sector.

• Saving is assumed to be determined primarily by disposable income (Yd), but it also may be affected by taxes and real wealth.

Page 13: Income Determination

Saving

• Saving is directly related to disposable income. S = -a0 + (1-b)Yd

• -a0 is subsistence saving. When Yd = 0, and consumption is positive, saving must be negative.

• (1-b) is the marginal propensity to save, MPS. It tells us by how much saving changes when disposable income changes.

Page 14: Income Determination

Practice

• Given the following, fill in the blanks

• Yd Consumption Saving MPC MPS

• 5000 4000• 4000 3200• 3000 2400• 2000 1600

• Yd = Disposable income

Page 15: Income Determination

Consumption in the AE/AS Model

• Changes in any of the variables that determine consumption spending will cause the consumption line to shift.– Increases in consumption shift C up

• Consumption rises when taxes fall, real wealth rises, and the price level falls.

– Decreases in consumption shift C down• Consumption falls when taxes rise, real wealth falls,

and the price level rises.

Page 16: Income Determination

Consumption Spending and Taxes

• Taxes are imposed by the government to pay for government supplied goods and services.

• Taxes affect consumption because they change disposable income.– Disposable income is defined as personal income

minus personal taxes. It is income after taxes.

• The process is as follows:– A change in taxes causes a change in disposable

income which causes a change in consumption.

Page 17: Income Determination

Consumption and Taxes

• A change in taxes causes an opposite change in consumption.– Increases in taxes decrease disposable income,

causing people to decrease consumption and/or saving.

– Decreases in taxes increase disposable income, causing people to increase consumption and/or saving.

• /\Taxes /\Yd /\C

Page 18: Income Determination

Consumption, Saving, and Taxes

• The amounts by which people change consumption or saving depend on the marginal propensity to consume and the marginal propensity to save.– If taxes decrease by $100 when the MPC is 0.8 and the

MPS is 0.2, consumption spending rises by $80 and saving rises by $20.

– If taxes increase by $100 when the MPC is 0.8 and the MPS is 0.2, consumption spending falls by $80 and saving falls by $20.

Page 19: Income Determination

Practice

• By how much and in what direction will consumption change given the following:– Taxes rise by $300 and the MPC is 0.9

– Taxes fall by $250 and the MPC is 0.8

– Taxes rise by $100 and the MPC is 0.75

– Taxes fall by $1.00 and the MPC is 0.6

• Describe the relationship between taxes and consumption spending.

Page 20: Income Determination

Consumption and Taxes

• A change in taxes changes consumption by an amount equal to: /\C = -(/\Tax times MPC).– Note the minus sign reflecting the inverse

relationship between consumption and taxes.

• Taxes are an exogenous variable (determined outside the model). Therefore, changes in taxes cause the consumption line to shift.– Increases in taxes shift consumption down.– Decreases in taxes shift consumption up.

Page 21: Income Determination

Consumption and Taxes

AE= C

Y0

a0

a1

C1

C2

A change in taxes shifts theconsumption function by the amount-(/\Tx x MPC).

An increase in taxes shifts the line downfrom C1 to C0.

A decrease in taxes shifts the line up from C1 to C2.

-(/\Tx x MPC)

a2

C0

Taxes up

Taxes down

Page 22: Income Determination

Consumption and Wealth

• Real wealth is the real net value of all the assets that a person owns.

• Consumption is directly related to real wealth.– Other things remaining the same, more real wealth

permits more consumption.• Increases in real wealth shift the consumption line up.

• Decreases in real wealth shift the consumption line down.

Page 23: Income Determination

Consumption and Wealth

AE= C

Y0a0

a1

C1

C2 An increase in real wealth shifts the consumption line up from C2 to C3.

A decrease in real wealth shifts the consumption line down from C2 to C1.

C3

Decrease in wealth

Increase in wealth

a2

Page 24: Income Determination

Consumption and the Price Level

• The purchasing power of any money fixed asset declines as the price level rises and rises as the price level declines.– Consumption is negatively related to changes in the

price level.• Other things remaining the same,

– Increases in the price level decrease purchasing power and shift the consumption line down.

– Decreases in the price level increase purchasing power and shift the consumption line up.

Page 25: Income Determination

Consumption and the Price Level

AE= C

Y0

a0

a1

C1

C2 A decrease in the price levelshifts the consumption line up from C2 to C3.

An increase in the price levelshifts the consumption line down from C2 to C1.

C3

Increase in prices

Decrease in prices

a2

Page 26: Income Determination

Practice

• How will the following event affect real consumption spending? What effect will they have on the consumption function?– A rise in the general price level

– A rise in the stock market

– People believe that a recession is imminent

– Taxes are increased

– Interest rates fall

– People save more for the future

Page 27: Income Determination

Investment

• Investment is defined as all spending done by the business sector on plant, equipment, and inventories.

• An important determinant of investment spending is the rate of interest.– There is a negative relationship between investment

and the rate of interest.• As interest rates rise, investment falls.

• As interest rates fall, investment rises.

Page 28: Income Determination

Interest Rates and Investment

• The negative relationship between interest rates and investment exists because firms must either borrow or generate their own funds to invest. – As a result, firms are willing to invest in only those

projects that pay a return in excess of the borrowing cost or rate of interest paid.

• When rates are high, few projects are sufficiently profitable, but as rates fall, more and more projects become profitable.

Page 29: Income Determination

Investment and the Rate of Interest

interest rate

Investment

I

i2

i1

I1 I2

At i2, the higher rate of interest, investment equals I1. Only a few projectsare profitable at this high level.

At i1, the lower rate of interest,investment equals I2. As the rate of interestfalls, more projects become profitable.

0

Page 30: Income Determination

Putting Investment in the Model

• Investment enters the model as a lump sum; i.e., it does not vary with income (Y).– This is another example of a simplifying assumption.

– It means that investment spending will be the same amount at every level of GDP.

Page 31: Income Determination

Investment in the AE/AS Model

AE= C I

Y0

C

C+I

Y1

Investment is drawn as a parallel lineabove consumption, reflecting theassumption that investment enters themodel as a lump-sum.

The distance between C and C+I represents lump-sum investment.

At Y1, consumption equals the linesegments Y1B, consumption plusinvestment is Y1A, and investment isAB.

A

B

Page 32: Income Determination

Investment in the AE/AS Model

• Changes in any of the variables that determine investment spending will cause the investment line and, therefore, the aggregate expenditure line to shift.– Increases in investment shift I and AE up

• Investment rises when interest rates fall, optimism rises, taxes fall, and technology changes.

– Decreases in investment shift I and AE down• Investment falls when interest rates rise, optimism

falls, taxes rise, and technology changes.

Page 33: Income Determination

Investment Determinants

• Expectations about the future affect investment directly.– Optimism about future earnings tends to increase

investment spending, while pessimism about future earnings tends to decrease investment spending.

• Taxes affect investment negatively.– Increases in taxes diminish profits and tend to decrease

investment.– Decreases in taxes increase profits and tend to increase

investment.

Page 34: Income Determination

Investment Determinants

• Changes in technology that improve the productivity of capital tend to increase investment spending.– However, when technology is changing very fast,

there may be a lag before businesses invest in the new technology. Why?

Page 35: Income Determination

Investment in the AE/AS Model

AE= C I

Y0

C + I1 = AE1

C + I2 = AE2

An increase in investmentspending from I1 to I2 shiftsaggregate expenditures from AE1

to AE2.

A decrease in investment spendingfrom I2 to I1 shifts aggregateexpenditures from AE2 to AE1.

Page 36: Income Determination

Practice

• What are the components of investment spending in the national income accounts?

• Explain what happens to investment spending and the investment schedule when the following occur– interest rates rise by 1%

– profit expectations fall suddenly

– business taxes on capital investment increase

– new technology becomes available

– people expect interest rates to rise next year

Page 37: Income Determination

Government Spending

• Government spending is defined as all spending done by all levels of government on goods and services.– Government spending enters the model as a lump-sum.

• We invoke this simplifying assumption because there is no consistent relationship between government spending and the level of national income.

Page 38: Income Determination

Government in the AE/AS Model

AE= C IG

Y0

C

C+I

Y1

B

A

Government spending is drawn as a parallel line above C+I, reflecting theassumption that government spendingenters the model as a lump-sum.

The distance between C+I and C+I+Grepresents lump-sum government expenditures.

At Y1, consumption equals the linesegments Y1B, consumption plusinvestment is Y1A, consumptionplus investment plus governmentspending is Y1E, investment isAB, and government spending is AE.

C+I+G

E

Page 39: Income Determination

Government in the AE/AS Model

• Changes in government spending cause the government line and, therefore, the aggregate expenditure line to shift.– Increases in government spending shift G and AE

up– Decreases in government spending shift G and AE

down

Page 40: Income Determination

Government in the AE/AS Model

AE= C IG

Y0

C+I+G1 = AE1

C+I+G3 = AE3

An increase in governmentspending from G2 to G3 shiftsaggregate expenditures from AE2

to AE3.

A decrease in government spendingfrom G2 to G1 shifts aggregateexpenditures from AE2 to AE1.

C+I+G2 = AE2

Page 41: Income Determination

Practice

• How will the following events affect the aggregate expenditure line and national income? Why?– An increase in consumer optimism

– A decrease in taxes paid by consumers

– A rise in the general price level

– A rise in the stock market

– An increase in government spending

– Real wealth increases

– Interest rates decline

Page 42: Income Determination

Net Exports

• Net exports are the difference between the goods and we produce for the rest of the world and the goods and services they produce for us.– Net exports equal exports minus imports

• NX= (X- M)

Page 43: Income Determination

Determinants of Net Exports

• Exports– Income in the rest of the world

• As income in the rest of the world increases (decreases), they buy more (less) from us.

– Relative prices• As our prices fall (rise) relative to prices in the rest of

the world, they buy more (less) from us.

– Exchange rate• As our currency appreciates (depreciates) relative to

other currencies, they buy less (more) from us.

Page 44: Income Determination

Determinants of Net Exports

• Imports– Income at home in the domestic economy

• As domestic income increases (decreases), we buy more (less) from abroad.

– Relative prices• As our prices fall (rise) relative to prices in the rest of

the world, we buy less (more) from abroad.

– Exchange rate• As our currency appreciates (depreciates) relative to

other currencies, we buy more (less) from abroad.

Page 45: Income Determination

Net Exports in the AE/AS Model

AE= C IGXn

Y0

CC+I

Y1

BA

Net exports (Xn) is drawn as a parallel line above C+I+G, reflectingthe assumption that net exportsenter the model as a lump-sum andthat exports exceed imports. If importsexceed exports, net exports is drawn asa parallel line below C+I+G.

The distance between C+I+G andC+I+G+Xn represents lump-sumnet export expenditures.

At Y1, consumption equals the linesegment Y1A, consumption plusinvestment is Y1B, consumptionplus investment plus governmentspending is Y1C, and consumptionplus investment plus government plusnet exports is Y1E.

C+I+GEC+I+G+Xn

C

Page 46: Income Determination

Net Exports in the AE/AS Model

• Changes in net exports cause the net exports line and, therefore, the aggregate expenditure line to shift.– Increases in net exports shift NX and AE up– Decreases in net exports shift NX and AE down

Page 47: Income Determination

Net Exports in the AE/AS Model

AE= C IGXn

Y0

C+I+G+Xn1 = AE1

C+I+G+Xn3 = AE3

An increase in net exportsNX2 to NX3 shiftsaggregate expenditures from AE2

to AE3.

A decrease in government spendingfrom NX2 to NX1 shifts aggregateexpenditures from AE2 to AE1.

C+I+G+Xn2 = AE2

Page 48: Income Determination

Equilibrium in the Model

• When the model is in equilibrium, all goods and services produced are demanded by the members of the various sectors of the economy.– Aggregate expenditures = Aggregate supply

• The equilibrium in this model is stable.– There are forces built into the model that push it

towards equilibrium.

Page 49: Income Determination

Stability of Equilibrium

AE= C IG

Y

AS

0

B

A

C

Y1 Y2 Y3

E

D

AE

At Y equal to Y1, AE > AS by the amount AB. The excess demand is metby an unexpected decrease in inventories.The sudden decrease signals producers toincrease production. As production rises,employment and national income rise.

At Y equal to Y2, AE < AS by the amount CD. Insufficient demand leads toan unexpected increase in inventories.The sudden increase signals producers todecrease production. As production falls,employment and national income fall.

At Y2, AE = AS.

Page 50: Income Determination

Practice

C

C + I

C + I + G

Y

AE

p

n

m

Y1 Y2 Y3

a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

j

AS

0

Page 51: Income Determination

Practice

• Assume Y = Y1 and using vertical line segments determine the following:– Consumption at Y1

– Investment at Y1

– Government spending at Y1

– Aggregate expenditures at Y1

– Consumption plus investment at Y1

– Investment plus government spending at Y1

– Subsistence consumption at Y1

• Repeat, assuming first that Y=Y2 and then Y=Y3

Page 52: Income Determination

Equilibrium with Algebra

Y = C + I + GC = a + bYd

Yd = Y - TI = IG = GY = a + b(Y-T) + I + GY = a + bY - bT + I + GY - bY = a - bT + I + GY(1 - b) = a - bT + I + GY = a - bT + I + G/(1-b)

Y = C + I + GC = 300 + 0.8Yd

Yd = Y - 1200I = 900G = 1300Y = 300 + 0.8(Y-1200) + 900 + 1300Y = 300 + 0.8Y - 960 + 900 + 1300Y = 1540 + 0.8YY - 0.8Y = 1540Y(1-0.8) = 1540Y = 1540/0.2 = 7700

Page 53: Income Determination

Practice

• Y = C + I + G • C = 100 + 0.9 Yd• Yd = Y - T• T = 30, I = 250, G = 300• Find equilibrium Y• Let the MPC = 0.8 and all other variables remain the same

and find equilibrium Y.• Let the MPC = 0.9 and taxes increase to 40 and find

equilibrium Y.• Is the equilibrium stable? Why?

Page 54: Income Determination

The Multiplier

• The multiplier is the ratio of the change in equilibrium GDP (Y) divided by the original change in spending that causes the change in GDP.– Investment multiplier = /\Y//\I

– Government spending multiplier = /\Y//\G

• GDP changes by a greater amount because a single change in spending ripples through the economy changing production, employment, and consumption again and again.

Page 55: Income Determination

Multiplier Process

AE= C IG

Y

AS

0

B

Y1 Y2

E1

AE1

AE2E2

The multiplier process begins at aninitial equilibrium level of Y such as Y1,

where AE=AS.

It is initiated by an autonomous changein spending that causes AE to exceed AS. We show that change as a shift in AE fromAE1 to AE2. Now at Y1, AE is greater thanAS by the amount BE1.

At this point, inventories fall and are replaced with new production that causesan increase in employment. As employmentincreases, income increases, and as incomeincreases, consumption rises.

We are now at D. We repeat the processuntil we reach E2.

C

DF

G

Page 56: Income Determination

Multiplier Formulas

• The numerical value of the multiplier can be found with the following formulas:– The formula for the investment and government spending

multiplier is: • m = 1/(1-b) or equivalently m = 1/MPS

– The formula for the lump-sum tax multiplier is:• m = -b/(1-b) or equivalently m = -b/MPS

• Note that (1-b), the MPS, represents spending that is not occurring. – It is a leakage out of the spending stream, and as it becomes

larger, the multiplier becomes smaller.

Page 57: Income Determination

Multiplier Math

• Spending multiplier:– /\Y = /\I + /\C

– /\C = b x /\Y

– Therefore,

– /\Y = /\I + b x /\Y

– /\Y - b x /\Y = /\I

– /\Y(1 - b) = /\I

– /\Y//\I = 1/(1-b)

Page 58: Income Determination

Practice

• Given the following, fill in the blanks• Yd Consumption MPC MPS Spending

Multiplier• 5000 4000• 4000 3200• 3000 2400• 2000 1600

• Yd = Disposable income

Page 59: Income Determination

Multiplier Math

• Lump-sum tax multiplier:– /\Y = /\C x 1/(1-b)

– /\C = -(/\T x b)

– Therefore,

– /\Y = -(/\T x b) x 1/(1-b)

– /\Y//\T = -b/(1-b)

Page 60: Income Determination

Practice

• Given the following, fill in the blanks• Yd Consumption MPC MPS Tax

Multiplier• 5000 4000• 4000 3200• 3000 2400• 2000 1600

• Yd = Disposable income

Page 61: Income Determination

Multiplier: Example

• Let /\I = 100 and the MPC = 0.8• /\I /\Yd /\C /\S• 100 100 80 20• 80 64 16• 64 51.2 12.8• 51.2 40.96 10.2• 40.96 32.76 8.2

• 500 400 100

Page 62: Income Determination

Practice

• Fill in the blanks in the table below:

• MPC Multiplier Change in Y if /\I = $1000

• 0.9• 0.8• 0.75• 0.6• 0.5

Page 63: Income Determination

Practice

• If the MPC is 0.9, and the government increases spending by 1.7 billion, by how much will Y change?

• If the MPC is 0.9, and the government increases taxes by 1.7 billion, by how much will Y change?

• If the MPC is 0.9, and the government simultaneously increases spending and increases taxes by 1.7 billion, by how much will Y change?

• Any thoughts?