incorporation and annexation report policy recommendations miami-dade county 2001-02
TRANSCRIPT
Incorporation and Annexation Report Policy Recommendations
Miami-Dade County
2001-02
Incorporation History
After 1991, seven additional areas were considered for incorporation: Aventura, Pinecrest, Sunny Isles Beach, Destiny, East and West Kendall, and Westchester
Of these, Aventura, Pinecrest and Sunny Isles Beach became municipalities
Incorporation History
A public opinion survey in 1995 indicated that most residents were familiar with the incorporation issue and that most were unsure or would rather wait for more information before voting on the issue
In a 1996 straw ballot, more voters were in favor of creating community councils than incorporation
Incorporation History
After the straw ballot, and under new Code provisions, Palmetto Bay, Doral, and Miami Lakes applied for incorporation
After a public hearing in 1996, the BCC did not allow these areas to go forward and imposed a one year moratorium on annexations and incorporations
Incorporation History
Several committees and task forces studied the incorporation and annexation issues from numerous perspectives
Revenue Sharing Task Force
The Task Force identified two alternatives as countywide revenue sources; each called for a one-half cent sales tax but differed from each other in that:– All cities were eligible to receive funding– Only cities that had below average per
capita taxable values were eligible for funding
Manager’s Incorporation Report, April 1999
Policy calling for total incorporation by 2007 repealed
Proposed new cities to remain within fire-rescue, libraries, and solid waste collection systems, and to receive and pay specialized law enforcement services from the County
Fiscal neutrality of areas through boundaries or mitigation strongly recommended
Manager’s Incorporation Report, April 1999
Consider the “town” alternative
Put on ballot the appropriate amendment to implement and enhance the enforceability of these conditions
Subsequent Actions
Miami Lakes Municipal Advisory Committee (MAC)
Palmetto Bay MAC
October 3, 2000, Charter Amendment
Subsequent Actions
Incorporation of Miami Lakes
Incorporation of Palmetto Bay
Creation of MACs in Redland, Doral, Country Club Lakes, West Dade, North Central and West Kendall
Incorporation and Annexation
Fundamental Policy Recommendations
Annexation
When viable, annexation is the preferred option to control number of municipalities and ensure fiscal strength of existing cities and areas pursuing local governance
Annexation
Working with the Miami-Dade League of Cities, initiate a review to identify potential annexation areas for existing municipalities
Annexation
Consider increasing the UMSA millage to enhance services and to make UMSA tax rate somewhat more comparable with municipal rates
In certain circumstances share utility tax and franchise fee revenue from annexed area with annexing city
Annexation - Enclave Areas
A Charter amendment presented to the voters to grant the Board of County Commissioners the authority to force the annexation of enclave areas completely surrounded by one or more municipalities and meeting pre-defined thresholds for population and geographic size
Regional-type Municipal Services
New municipalities must continue to receive these services from the County:– Fire-Rescue– Library– Solid Waste Management – Specialized Police
Local Police Services
New municipalities should enter into a contract with the Miami-Dade Police Department for an initial period (3-5 years) after incorporation for patrol and purely local police services
Revenue Neutrality Policy
Proposed municipalities should generally be revenue neutral, through boundaries and mitigation payments
Revenue neutral means that the projected revenue loss to UMSA is not greater than the projected reduction in service cost
Revenue Neutrality Policy
A minimum municipal population of 10,000-15,000 is recommended to prevent the creation of an inordinate number of new cities in Miami-Dade County
If recommended policies are adopted, a large number of new cities can be created without adversely impacting UMSA of County “regional-type” municipal services
Mitigation Policy
With respect to the County’s business resource areas:– Provide for the retention of commercial
and industrial areas in UMSA, or
– Retain 100 percent of the difference in revenues generated and agreed upon expenses in commercial and industrial areas
Mitigation Policy
With regard to all other areas, mitigation payments should be calculated based on the difference between current revenues generated and expenses incurred in the area less a reasonable allocation for setting up a local government and minor improvements in service
Limited Purpose Governments - “Towns”
Create limited purpose governments (“towns”) for areas desiring more local autonomy
Towns will, most likely, be appropriate under one of two scenarios:– Area is too small to be a separate
municipality– Area does not have the tax base to
support full-fledged government
“Towns”
“Towns” obtain funds to purchase enhancements to local police, code enforcement, parks, landscape maintenance, etc.
County establishes minimum standards for all municipal services as an UMSA-wide baseline
Regulatory Control Over Areas of Countywide Significance
The County should retain regulatory control over areas of countywide significance
Incorporation and Annexation
Policies Supporting the Incorporation and Annexation
Processes
Countywide Revenue Sharing
While controversial, countywide revenue sharing is an important enough concept to deserve serious consideration
Countywide Revenue Sharing
A limited assistance program will need to be implemented to assist municipalities with low tax bases fund their specialized police service costs
UMSA-wide Incorporation Plan
Total Incorporation of Miami-Dade County
If a pre-determined trigger point for the reduced size of UMSA is reached, the BCC should adopt an aggressive policy toward annexation and incorporation of the remainder of UMSA
Boundary Disputes
To resolve boundary disputes, a set of guiding principles should be adopted, which can be used to arbiter disputes on a case-by-case basis
Areas Outside the Urban Development Boundary
Annexations and incorporations that include areas outside the urban development boundary should continue to be considered on a case-by-case basis
Areas Outside the Urban Development Boundary
The County should retain approval authority over all land use decisions in such areas
Areas Outside the Urban Development Boundary
No incorporation/annexation of areas with environmentally sensitive areas, such as well fields, should be allowed
Enclaves, Efficiency in Service Delivery
Existing enclaves should be eliminated through modification of boundaries or, alternatively, through contracting for services with municipalities
Financial Issues
Franchise Fee Distribution
Franchise fees transferred to municipalities should reflect net of all contractual discounts exercised by FPL
Payment of QNIP Debt
New municipalities need to be responsible for paying their share of QNIP debt service based on the cost of the improvements made within their proposed municipal boundaries
Financial Impact to UMSA
The creation of Country Club Lakes, Redland, and the annexation to Medley, do not have an adverse financial impact on UMSA
Municipal Advisory Committees (MACs)
It is recommended that there be no more than two active MACs at any given time
MACs should be appointed for two years
Peripheral Issues
Revise method of funding specialized police services
Municipal Assistance Task Forces
Competitive Government Contracting
Specialized Police Service
86% of County residents pay directly for specialized police services
14% of County residents only pay for specialized services through countywide taxes
Specialized Police Service
Newly created cities like Key Biscayne, Pinecrest, Aventura, and Sunny Isles Beach are not directly paying for specialized police costs. Without a change in policy, as new incorporations occur, more of the burden will switch to the countywide budget
Specialized Police Service
The total cost of specialized police services in the County is estimated at approximately $155 million; the countywide budget does not have sufficient capacity to absorb these expenditures
Specialized Police Service
Existing municipalities should either provide their own specialized police services or contract with another municipality or the County
All municipalities receiving specialized police services from the County should contract and pay for such services
Specialized Police Service
Given that this policy, unlike the mitigation policy, is under the County’s control, it would be unfair to charge only new cities for specialized services
County will have to establish a program to assist municipalities with a lower per capita tax base to cover the costs of specialized police services
Specialized Police Service
Recognizing that municipalities will need time to plan for contracting and paying for specialized police services, this policy should be effective no earlier than FY 2002-03
Competitive Government
Opportunities for the County to provide other municipal services on contractual basis to new and existing municipalities should be pursued aggressively