indian economy ezell 2014

8/19/2019 indian economy ezell 2014

1/16

May 30, 2014

The Indian Economy at a CrossroadsModerator:

Robert Atkinson, President, ITIF

Presenters/Respondents:

Representative Ami Bera, (CA-7)

Stephen Ezell, Senior Analyst, ITIF

Rick Rossow, Wadhwani Chair in U.S. India Policy Studies,

Center for Strategic and International StudiesMark Elliot, Executive VP Global Intellectual Property

Center, U.S. Chamber of Commerce

#Indianeconomy @ITIFdc


2/16

2

Evolution of India’s Post-Independence Economy

State control of “commanding heights” of the economy.

Import substitution industrialization approach.

“Small is beautiful” & “lump of labor” mentality.

1950s-1980s

1990s-2000s

Greater embrace of economic and trade liberalization.

Economy grew 40% faster per year next two decades.


3/16

3

But India Has Taken a Turn toward “Innovation

Mercantilism”

Flickr: marzzelo

Flickr: Alan Miles NYCFlickr: Nedral


4/16

4

1. Slowing economic growth.

Turn toward Innovation Mercantilism a Result of:

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014(est.)

Source: Trading Economics

India GDP Growth, 2004-2014


5/16

5

1. Slowing economic growth.

2. Policies enacted by competitior nations (i.e. China).

3. Desire to bolster manufacturing sectors as primaryresponse to persistent trade deficit and looming

“demographic dividend.”

Turn to Innovation Mercantilism a Result of:


6/16

6

But IM Policies are Unsustainable and Non-Optimal

1. Raise the cost of key inputs and GPTs, including ICTs,while contributing to broad economic inefficiencies.

2. Damage countries participation in global value chains.

3. Cause reputational harm.

4. Perpetuate a contagion effect.

5. Usually fail to achieve their intended objectives.


7/16

7

Reformulating India’s Economic Strategy

1. Recognize centrality of across-the-board productivitygrowth to both economic and employment growth.


8/16

8

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013(est.)

2014(est.)

Indian Labor Productivity Growth Languishing

Source: The Conference Board

Average Annual Indian Labor Productivity Growth, 2005-2014


9/16

9

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Korea Argentina Russia Mexico Malyasia Chile SouthAfrica

Brazil China India

Labor Productivity as Percent U.S. Level, 2012

Source: The Conference Board

As Well as Relative Labor Productivity Levels


10/16

10


1. Recognize centrality of productivity growth to botheconomic and employment growth.

2. Embrace Say’s Law: If stable macroeconomicconditions exist, supply will create demand.

3. Acknowledge manufacturing won’t be an employmentpanacea; need strong contributions from services.

(Don’t favor ICT mfg. to detriment of ICT services)

4. Play an attraction, not a compulsion, strategy.(Offer a superior environment for FDI)


11/16

11

Bolster Foreign Direct Investment

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

SouthAfrica

Turkey Brazil Russia Mexico India Indonesia China

OECD Regulatory Restrictiveness Index Score

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

Average Annual FDI (net inflows,

percent of GDP), 1996-2011

Source: OECD, World Bank Data


12/16

12


1. Recognize centrality of productivity growth to botheconomic and employment growth.

2. Embrace Say’s Law: If stable macroeconomicconditions exist, supply will create demand.

3. Manufacturing won’t be an employment panacea; needstrong contributions from services.

(Don’t favor ICT mfg. to detriment of ICT services)

4. Play an attraction, not a compulsion game.

5. Embrace the “Modern Economy Path.”


13/16

13

Modern Economy Path — Economic Growth Pyramid


14/16

14

Feature Policy Recommendations

1. Appoint a National Productivity Commission.

2. Improve process of interagency communication andcoordination in administrative and agency rulemaking.

3. Repeal the PMA and join ITA expansion negotiations.

4. Increase ease of business registration and operation.

5. Reform labor market regulations (e.g. Industrial Disputes Act).


15/16

15

Aspirational Vision for India’s Economy

1. Increase average annual labor productivity growth rateto 6 percent.

2. Grow real Indian per-capita GDP by 300% over comingdecade, pushing per-capita income to @$5,000.

3. Become first-ranked developing country in World Bank’sEase of Doing Business Index.

4. Run a balanced current account.

5. Successfully leverage the demographic dividend.


16/16

facebook.com/innovationpolicy

www.innovationfiles.org

www.youtube.com/techpolicy

www.itif.org

Follow ITIF:

Thank You

Stephen Ezell [email protected]

indian economy ezell 2014

Documents