indian food-security-debate-2010

93
NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY – DEBATE: INDIA 2010 Govt. of India, National Advisory Council , A phased programme, Meet in October, 2010 ************ NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY CIVIL SOCEITY DEBATES What is ‘food insecurity’ & how it may be eliminated for poor people and children, Early childcare, ICDS, Pre-primary education, Targeted / Universal Public Distribution System, Agri -minister’s Views, M S Swaminathan, Amartya K Sen, Right to food campaign, other arguments, facts

Upload: h-janardan-prabhu

Post on 16-Apr-2017

506 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Indian food-security-debate-2010

NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY – DEBATE: INDIA 2010

• Govt. of India, National Advisory Council ,

• A phased programme, Meet in October, 2010

************

NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY CIVIL SOCEITY DEBATES

• What is ‘food insecurity’ & how it may be eliminated for poor people and children,

• Early childcare, ICDS, Pre-primary education,

• Targeted / Universal Public Distribution System,

• Agri -minister’s Views,

• M S Swaminathan, Amartya K Sen,

• Right to food campaign, other arguments, facts

Page 2: Indian food-security-debate-2010

2

Page 3: Indian food-security-debate-2010

The National Advisory Council (NAC)

Provided a broad framework

Page 4: Indian food-security-debate-2010

The National Advisory Council

4

• A broad framework to achieve the goal of food for all and forever:

• The NAC's suggestions include the swift initiation of

• programmes to insulate pregnant and nursing mothers, infants in the age group of zero to three, and other disadvantaged citizens, from hunger and malnutrition.

• Such special nutrition support programmes may need annually about 10 million tonnes of food grains.

Page 5: Indian food-security-debate-2010

5

The NAC has stressed that in the design of the

delivery system there should be

• a proper match between challenge and

response, as for example,

• the starting of community kitchens in urban

areas to ensure that the needy do not go to

bed hungry.

• Pregnant women should get priority.

Page 6: Indian food-security-debate-2010

NAC Meet: Food Grain Entitlement Programme

pre-school children, school children, welfare hostel students, adolescent girls, pregnant women, street children, the homeless, the aged, the infirm, the differently abled, those living with leprosy, TB, HIV/AIDS etc., together with community kitchens and feeding the destitute.

6

NAC takes a holistic approach to the issue, with broad concerns about the nutritional needs of the most vulnerable, suggesting 8 different entitlements for them apart from the PDS., such as comprehensive nutrition support schemes for infants,

Page 7: Indian food-security-debate-2010

7

• The NAC has proposed a phased programme of implementation of the goal of universal public distribution system.

• This will start with either one-fourth of the districts or blocks in 2011-12 and cover the whole country by 2015,

• on lines similar to that adopted for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Programme (MGNREGP).

Page 8: Indian food-security-debate-2010

8

This will provide time to develop infrastructure such as• grain storage facilities and • Village Knowledge Centres and • the issue of Household Entitlements

Passbooks. The NAC is developing inputs for the proposed Food Security Act covering legal entitlements and enabling provisions based on the principle of common but differentiated entitlements, taking into account the unmet needs of the underprivileged.

Page 9: Indian food-security-debate-2010

9

Page 10: Indian food-security-debate-2010

Meeting on September 24, 2010

• The Sonia Gandhi-led NAC may finalise the Food Security Bill in New Delhi on September 24. P. C. Dep. Chair Montek Singh Ahluwalia and officials from Ministries concerned, Women and Child Development Secretary, will be present to try and help bridge the differences between the NAC and the Commission / Ministries.

• On August 30, while pushing for universalisation of food security — the position also of the Campaign for Food Security — Ms. Gandhi pointed out that the poor might wonder why the rich were being given the same entitlements. The view that there be a system of two prices and differential entitlements was conceded.

10

Page 11: Indian food-security-debate-2010

11

Ms. Gandhi had also underlined the importance of taking the government's opinion — that of the Ministries concerned — on board. Since then, key members of the NAC's Working Group on Food Security, including Harsh Mander, Jean Dreze and N.C. Saxena, have had detailed discussions on the issue with Mr. Ahluwalia and Commission Member Narendra Jadhav, who doubles as an NAC member. Sources say a system of differential entitlements is being worked out so that those living below the poverty line (BPL) — at the enhanced Tendulkar Committee report's figure of about 42 per cent — can be given 35 kg of food grains, with rice at Rs.3 a kg and wheat at Rs.2 a kg. Sources indicated there was already agreement on this.

Page 12: Indian food-security-debate-2010

12

At the NAC meeting on September 24, a decision may be taken on how much the rest of the population will get — 25 kg of food grains as promised in the Congress manifesto and in the President's address last year, or enhanced entitlement of 35 kg, and at what price. The government is pushing for status quo, while the NAC would like it to be increased to 35 kg; however, the price, sources said, at which the food grains will be made available to the non-BPL population is likely to be pegged at 75 per cent of the Minimum Support Price (MSP). However, while this part of the Bill looks headed for a consensus, the more significant part relating to securing the nutritional requirements of those at the bottom of the economic ladder, and which has huge financial implications, will also have to be sorted out.

Page 13: Indian food-security-debate-2010

13

At the August 30 meeting, Mr. Mander, who heads the Working Group on Food Security, had listed a range of eight entitlements apart from an inclusive and enhanced Public Distribution System. These included schemes for children such as Integrated Child Development Services and maternal nutrition, community kitchens for those suffering from tuberculosis and HIV-AIDS, homeless children and destitute people and old age pensions. It is in this context that officials from the Ministries that deal with these subjects are expected to attend the September 24 meeting. (To be continued in October)

Page 14: Indian food-security-debate-2010

14

Government of India (National Advisory Council), 24 Sept. 2010, Press Release

1.The Fifth meeting of the National Advisory Council was chaired by Smt. Sonia Gandhi on 24th September, 2010 at 2 Motilal Nehru Place, New Delhi.2.Members who attended the meeting were Prof. M.S. Swaminathan, MP, Dr. Ram Dayal Munda, MP, Prof. Narendra Jadhav, Prof. Pramod Tandon, Dr. Jean Dreze, Ms. Aruna Roy, Ms Anu Aga, Shri N.C. Saxena, Dr. A.K. Shiva Kumar, Shri Deep Joshi, Ms. Farah Naqvi, Shri Harsh Mander and Ms. Mirai Chatterjee.3.A presentation was made by Shri Harsh Mander, convenor of the Working Group on the framework of proposed Right to Food Security Bill detailing the Working Group’s proposal.

Page 15: Indian food-security-debate-2010

15

4.Deputy Chairman, Planning Commission, Shri Montek S Ahluwalia, Secretary (Food & Public Distribution), Smt. Alka Sirohi, Secretary (Women & Child Development), Dr D.K. Sikri, and Secretary (Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation), Ms Kiran Dhingra made presentations, placing the viewpoint of the Planning Commission and respective Ministries/Departments.

5.The Working Group took note of the issues which emerged from the discussion. A further round of discussions is to take place before the proposal of the Working Group could be finalised.6.The next meeting of the NAC is scheduled to be held on 23 October, 2010.

Page 16: Indian food-security-debate-2010

16

Page 17: Indian food-security-debate-2010

NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY CIVIL SOCEITY DEBATES

• Components of Food Security

• What is ‘food insecurity’ & how it may be eliminated for poor people and children,

• Early childcare, ICDS, Pre-primary education,

• Targeted / Universal Public Distribution System,

• Agri -minister’s Views,

• M S Swaminathan, Amartya K Sen,

• Right to food campaign, other arguments, facts

Page 18: Indian food-security-debate-2010

Components of Food Security: Make production, processing

(storage) & distribution of food grains equitable, sustainable

• The focus on accelerated food grains production on a sustainable basis and

• Universal Public Distribution System, plus

• free trade in grains would

• help create massive employment and

• reduce the incidence of poverty in rural areas.

• This will lead to faster economic growth and give purchasing power to the people.

Page 19: Indian food-security-debate-2010

19

Page 20: Indian food-security-debate-2010

Food_Availability, Access and Absorption

• Food availability is assured when enough of it is produced or imported and at an affordable price it is available locally.

• Food access is assured when we can buy, prepare and consume food to avail a nutritious diet.

• Food absorption is assured when we have normal physical and mental health and are able to maintain it with our diet.

20

Page 21: Indian food-security-debate-2010

21

Page 22: Indian food-security-debate-2010

FOOD AND NUTRITION SECURITY-2

• Food supplementation to address special needs of

– the vulnerable groups,

– Integrated Child Development services [ICDS] and

– mid-day meals at secondary schools

• Nutrition education, especially through

– Food and Nutrition Board [FNB] and

– ICDS.

22

Page 23: Indian food-security-debate-2010

• Eliminate Poverty, and

• Child mal-nutritionIntegrated Child

Development Services (ICDS) and its objectives

That every individual has

• the physical, economic, social, and environmental access to a balanced diet that includes

• the necessary macro-and micro-nutrients,

• safe drinking water,

• sanitation, environmental hygiene, primary healthcare and

• education so as to lead a healthy and productive life.

India’s Golden Dream to be realized

.

Page 24: Indian food-security-debate-2010

Brain development from Infancy to childhood

• Infants: children below one year

• Toddlers: age group 1-2 years

• Preschoolers: age group 3 to 5 years

• School going: In the age group 6 to 14

• Scientists say 90% of brain develops by age 5

• Economists say

prevention is better

than cure and

• Child specialists say early years are foundational to development

24

Page 25: Indian food-security-debate-2010

Population below Poverty Line is significant

• Although India has become self sufficient in food grains production, the ever increasing population of the country is a major cause of concern in sustaining food security and nutritional security. The population approaches 1200 million, while about 260 million are below the poverty line and prevalence of widespread under-nourishment and mal-nourishment are a cause of concern.

25

Page 26: Indian food-security-debate-2010

26

Page 27: Indian food-security-debate-2010

child under-nutrition in India

• Stunting (deficiency in

height for age)

• Wasting (deficiency in

weight for height)

• Underweight (that is

deficient in weight for

age - a composite mea-

sure of stunting and

wasting).

• Most of the times, child deaths and suffering because of poor nutrition go unnoticed.

• That India reports among

the highest levels of child

under-nutrition has been

rightly termed by Prime

Minister Manmohan

Singh as a "national

shame".

27

Page 28: Indian food-security-debate-2010

28

Page 29: Indian food-security-debate-2010

early childcare is very important

• People below poverty line neglect the young. India continues to lose 6 % of our newborns before their first birthday; 50 % of our toddlers to malnutrition and a whole generation to poor health, low skills and poverty.

• Can we afford to ignore the role that crèches play in the survival, development and well-being of young children?

29

Page 30: Indian food-security-debate-2010

Eliminate under nutrition

30

Page 31: Indian food-security-debate-2010

Integrated Child Development Services(ICDS)

• It is a major national programme that addresses the

needs of children under the age of six years.

• It seeks to provide young children with an integrated

package of services such as supplementary nutrition,

healthcare and pre-school education.

• As the needs of a child can not be addressed in isolation

from those of its mother, the programme also extends to

adolescent girls, pregnant women and nursing mothers.

31

Page 32: Indian food-security-debate-2010

32

Page 33: Indian food-security-debate-2010

33

Page 34: Indian food-security-debate-2010

Integrated Child Development Services(ICDS)

• Over the last two decades the ICDS coverage has progressively increased. As of March 2002, 5652 projects have been sanctioned; there are more than 5 lakh anganwadis in the country.

• The number of persons covered under ICDS rose from 5.7 million children of

0 – 6 age, and 1.2 million mothers in 1985 to

31.5 million children and 6 million mothers

up to March 2002.

34

Page 35: Indian food-security-debate-2010

What is a crèche?

• A crèche is not just an enabling mechanism so that mothers can work, but central to the battle against malnutrition, low birth weight and infant mortality.

• It essentially facilitates an aware adult to take on the small tasks involved in childcare for children under three years of age such as patient feeding of small katories of soft food three or four times a day. Continued…

35

Page 36: Indian food-security-debate-2010

What is a crèche?

• It essentially facilitates an aware adult to take on the small tasks involved in childcare for children under three years of age such as

• A quick response to fever or diarrhea,

• To prevent illness from becoming life threatening,

• Some one to greet and comfort the child when she wakes up.

Page 37: Indian food-security-debate-2010

A crèche essentially facilitates

• We need crèches so that grand-parents do not ask girls to stay back leaving them free to play run and go to school.

• We need crèches so that women are treated as citizens with rights and receive the support they need during this time of motherhood and early childcare, thus enabling them to participate in work and life.

37

Page 38: Indian food-security-debate-2010

38

Page 39: Indian food-security-debate-2010

39

Page 40: Indian food-security-debate-2010

Child & Mother nutrition: a major challenge

• Nutrition indicators like under weight in pre-school children, stunting, wasting of these children, prevalence of low birth weight, anemia in pregnant women, adolescent girls and children under three years, poor breast feeding and complementary feeding rates pose a major challenge.

• Chronic mal-nutrition among school children as reflected by stunting and wasting is 45.5 %, and 15.5 % respectively as per national Family Health Survey (NFHS) 2, 1998-99.

40

Page 41: Indian food-security-debate-2010

41

Page 42: Indian food-security-debate-2010

Women’s education and child malnutrition

• Data show that malnutrition among Indian

children born to illiterate mothers (52%), is

almost three times higher than levels reported

among mothers who have completed 12

years of education(18%).

42

Page 43: Indian food-security-debate-2010

PRE-PRIMARY EDUCATION

FROM CRECHE TO NURSURY

TO KG/UG

Page 44: Indian food-security-debate-2010

Pre-primary Education

Pre-primary Education is offered to children in both urban and rural areas.

In urban areas, where sufficient children are available within a reasonable radius, separate Nursery Schools or departments are provided. (continued)

44

Page 45: Indian food-security-debate-2010

Pre-primary Education

• Otherwise nursery classes are attached to Junior Basic or Primary Schools.

• In addition to that Pre-Primary education is provided free of cost.

• Thus, the main object of Pre-primary Education is to give young children social experience rather than formal instruction.

• It has an essential part to play in every school System, though Pre-primary education in India is not a fundamental right and thus a very low percentage of children receive preschool educational facilities.

45

Page 46: Indian food-security-debate-2010

46

• In India these services are called Integrated Child Development Services and Anganwadis.

• Indian pre- primary schools have different provisions.

• These kindergartens are divided into two stages -lower kindergarten (LKG) and upper kindergarten (UKG).

• LKG class comprises children from 3 to 4 years of age, and the

• UKG class comprises children 4 to 5 years of age.• The completion of preprimary schools sends the

children to primary schools.

Page 47: Indian food-security-debate-2010

47

Pre-primary education helps develop

• the physical and mental development of the

children,

• promote their emotional and educational

development, and

• smoothen their socialization (social

development) process.

Page 48: Indian food-security-debate-2010

48

In the formal education system, Pre-primary

Education is considered to be an integral part of

regular schools.

Therefore, all pre -primary instruction is

attached to Junior Basic or Primary Schools.

The pre primary education is termed as

`Nursery`.

Page 49: Indian food-security-debate-2010

49

Pre primary education also extends to

• Kindergartens,

• crèches and

• Montessori schools.

In these sections of schools, these special educational

facilities are made available to the children below the

compulsory age of six.

Page 50: Indian food-security-debate-2010

50

The main objective of pre-primary education is

• to present an environment to children to develop a

healthy mind through constructive activities and

• informal learning experiences.

• This environment also prepares children for a later

day primary education by

• enabling them to adjust to the surroundings outside

their home.

Page 51: Indian food-security-debate-2010

51

Actually, in pre-primary education importance is not

to be given to any kind of formal teaching or learning,

and attention is to be given to the psychological

development of the children.

The activities of pre-school are to be designed as per

the interest and the need of the children. So, it is

ideal not to have a permanent syllabus for the pre-

school programme.

Page 52: Indian food-security-debate-2010

52

Generally, the main activities of pre-schools are

free-play, organized play, story sessions, music

and dance, acting, drawing and painting,

creative work, nature study, language

development, and inculcating a sense of

counting, measurements, and weight.

Page 53: Indian food-security-debate-2010

SOCIALIZATION PROCESSES, PRE-PRIMARY EDUCATION,LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT MATERIALS

• A child who is already a member of a family learns to become a member of a society through the process of socialization in which language plays a very important role.

• Though it is often quoted that, as far as pre-school is concerned, "love is the language and play is the method," love should also be expressed in a human language, in addition to other parental or caregivers' loving behavior, including nonverbal behavior.

53

Page 54: Indian food-security-debate-2010

SOCIALIZATION PROCESSES, PRE-PRIMARY EDUCATION,LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT MATERIALS

• The shelter of parental love takes a backseat in the pre-school environment, and is, kind of, substituted by an institutional arrangement of a learning environment in which teacher and other children come to play a part.

• From a family situation, a child thus begins to get exposed to the rain and shine of the community that surrounds it.

54

Page 55: Indian food-security-debate-2010

Role of mother tongue

• This process of socialization becomes very natural if it is done in the mother tongue of the child.

• Since language itself is a system of symbols, when the initial socialization is done in a non-mother tongue of the child, language symbolism gets more complicated and the child begins to feel uneasy.

55

Page 56: Indian food-security-debate-2010

LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT

• This happens more so, especially when the language used in the pre-school has no opportunities of reinforcement outside its school environment.

• First generation learners and children from the families which have very little exposure or competence in English face this barrier.

56

Page 57: Indian food-security-debate-2010

57

The Indian government lays emphasis to primary education up to the age of fourteen years (referred to as Elementary Education in India.) It has also banned child labour in order to ensure that the children do not enter unsafe working conditions.Both free education and the ban on child labour are

difficult to enforce due to economic disparity and social conditions. 80% of all recognized schools at the Elementary Stage are government run/supported, making it the largest provider of education in the Country.

Page 58: Indian food-security-debate-2010

58

• However, due to shortage of resources and lack of political will, this system suffers from

• massive gaps including high pupil teacher ratios,

• shortage of infrastructure and • poor level of teacher training. • Education has also been made free for

children for six to 14 years of age or up to class VIII under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act 2009.

Page 59: Indian food-security-debate-2010

TARGETED VS UNIVERSAL PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (PDS) FOR FOOD

Costs of procuring, storing & distributing food grains

at low cost and

hence TPDS /PDS alternates.

59

Page 60: Indian food-security-debate-2010

The proportion of rural population that is below the BPL

[ Below Poverty Line]

60

Page 61: Indian food-security-debate-2010

BPL Census should consider

• In deciding its coverage, allowance should be

made to targeting errors which would be large,

but also consider the fact that the under-

nutrition rates in India tend to be much higher

than that of poverty estimates: the gap is not

surprising considering that the official ‘poverty-

line’ is really a destitution line.

61

Page 62: Indian food-security-debate-2010

Government is helpless• Two arguments mark the opposition to an

universal system (whether in the PDS or other sectors like health )

1. There is no money for the huge subsidy.

2. We may not have enough grain for an universal system when successive draught years happen, and high input costs of agriculture may bring down production.

”Non- government-orgs” too should play a

substantial role.

62

Page 63: Indian food-security-debate-2010

Food Minister of India,29-08-2010

• Union Minister for Food said

free food grains distribution

is not feasible. The Govt.

already spends Rs. 66,000

crores on food grains subsidy.

We buy wheat from farmers

at Rs. 15 a kg. but sell it to

the Antyodaya population at

Rs. 2 a kg.

63

• How can we sell any cheaper than that?

• Free distribution of grains would ruin the producers.

• The supreme Court had not directed the food grains be distributed free of cost.

• The wastage of food grains was reduced by present government to 0.02 % of total production.

Page 64: Indian food-security-debate-2010

States do not lift, food grains, alleging high price

• “We do not follow the policy of artificially keeping the prices low any more.62 % of India’s population is dependent on agriculture. Do we want them to remain poor? Prices have been fixed considering the input costs so that farming becomes viable. This has led to an increase in the income of farmers,” he said.

64

• Mr. Pawar also criticised the States for buying only the food grains at the lowest price slab earmarked for the Antyodaya population and leaving the rest untouched. “I call up the Ministers and their secretaries, asking them to take away the food grains. But they are not interested.”

Page 65: Indian food-security-debate-2010

Food Minister of India,29-08-2010

65

• On the wastage of food grains, he said the Govt. had taken project to build warehouses. It was also hiring private warehouses.

• In past 8 years, wastage had been reduced substantially, and this year it was just 0.02 % of the total produce.

Page 66: Indian food-security-debate-2010

Decentralise procurement, storage & distribution

66

Page 67: Indian food-security-debate-2010

M. S. Swaminathan-1

His stated vision is to rid the

world of hunger and poverty; Dr.

Swaminathan is an advocate of

moving India to sustainable

development, especially using

environmentally sustainable

agriculture, sustainable food

security and the preservation of

biodiversity, which he calls an

"evergreen revolution"

67

• That food originates from efficient and environmentally benign production technologies

• that conserve and enhance the natural resource base of crops, animal husbandry, forestry, inland and marine fisheries

Page 68: Indian food-security-debate-2010

M. S. Swaminathan-2

• Sustainable food security will have to be defined

as ‘physical, economic, social and ecological access to balanced diets’.

• A life cycle approach will have to be followed in the case of nutrition, ranging from in utero

to old age.

• Achieving such a form of food security will require synergy between technology and public policy.

68

Page 69: Indian food-security-debate-2010

M. S. Swaminathan-3• Adequate food availability is necessary both for

stabilizing prices and ensuring the operation of an

effective PDS. There is therefore no time to relax on the

food production front.

• There is particularly an urgent need for greater investment in irrigation, power supply, rural roads, cold storages, storage facilities and food processing units. By extending the benefits of technological transformation and institutional reform to more areas and farming systems, India can become a leader in world agriculture.

69

Page 70: Indian food-security-debate-2010

70

Page 71: Indian food-security-debate-2010

71

Swaminathan's abiding interest is, however, in

using science for strengthening the small-farmer

economy and in community approach to food and

nutrition security. The success stories are drawn

from Sri Lanka and Thailand, and the MSS

Foundation's own initiatives. Strategy for India is a

life-cycle approach and community "food- banks",

including locally grown millets, at the village level.

Page 72: Indian food-security-debate-2010

72

The breadth of history, the depth of science

in Einsteinian social perspective, the

nuanced reflections on the contribution

and conditions of humble peasantry, and an

informed concern over the ecological

imbalance and climate change - all. these

distinguishing features of the volume make

it a rewarding reading MSS.

Page 73: Indian food-security-debate-2010

AMARTYA KUMAR SEN73

Page 74: Indian food-security-debate-2010

74

Page 75: Indian food-security-debate-2010

75

Page 76: Indian food-security-debate-2010

For more information: www.betterworldheroes.com/sen.htm

76

Page 77: Indian food-security-debate-2010

77

Amartya Spake

Page 78: Indian food-security-debate-2010

78

The Kolkata Group, an independent initiative inspired and chaired by Amartya Sen, has demanded that the Right to Food Act be made non-discriminatory and universal to cover legal food entitlements for all Indians. The Eighth Kolkata Group Workshop (February 2010), has argued for creating durable legal entitlements that guarantee the right to food for all in the country. Sen stressed the need for the firm recognition of the right to food, and comprehensive legislation to guarantee everyone the right.

Page 79: Indian food-security-debate-2010

79

“A Right to Food Act covering enforceable food entitlements should be non-discriminatory and universal. Entitlements guaranteed by the Act should include food grains from the Public Distribution System (PDS), school meals, nutrition services for children below the age of six years, social security provision, and allied programmes”

Page 80: Indian food-security-debate-2010

THE RIGHT TO FOOD CAMPAIGNOther arguments and facts

80

Page 81: Indian food-security-debate-2010

81

The Right to Food Campaign, civil society and economists like Jean Dreze, point out several facts.

The poverty estimates of about 40 per cent given by the Tendulkar Committee to determine the number of poor who will receive subsidized food under the forthcoming National Food Security Act is inadequate to our current situation of hunger, starvation and malnutrition.Others that have submitted their reports are the National Committee for Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector (NCEUS) set up by the Government of India, that estimates that 77 % of our population have an income of less than Rs.20 per day in 2004-05; the Saxena Committee set up by the Ministry of Rural Development that says that 50 % of our population should be considered below the poverty line.

Page 82: Indian food-security-debate-2010

The paucity of resources can no longer be an excuse for keeping our people hungry. It is more a case of having the right priorities, and a moral deficit. The NCEUS report appointed by the government points out that the safety net can be provided within the available resources and capacity of the government. If a universal subsidy can work in Tamil Nadu state and PDS can work in Kerela state why can't it be made to work elsewhere?

82

Page 83: Indian food-security-debate-2010

A Right to Food Act is needed on compassionate grounds.

India wants to reach the moon but the question is whether it can reach its own starving children.

Who cares if the Commonwealth of the “Games” is so uncommonly unequal.

According to Harsh Mander, a Food Commissioner appointed by the Supreme Court, about ten homeless die every day in Delhi. Says Mander “That so many people die each day at our doorstep, close to the centers of power, is a reminder how scarce is compassion in our public life.”

83

Page 84: Indian food-security-debate-2010

84

At present, the government supplies 27.4 million tonne of rice and wheat for PDS, which costs it Rs 56,000 crore (in 2010-11). It estimates to have 50 million tonne of grain in its storage facilities at the worst point of the year. Back of the envelope calculations show the first year of NFSA, when one-fourth of the blocks or districts get almost universal coverage and special nutrition schemes are launched, would require around 50 million tonne of grain. The subsidy bill will go up by around Rs 20,000 crore.

But even so, the increase of fiscal subsidy might require only a political decision; supply of grain, on the other hand, is a governance issue that the NAC will have to fight and push hard.

Page 85: Indian food-security-debate-2010

85

The government has announced a 'second green revolution' through the non-irrigated lands,

but the agricultural ministry's past record does not inspire confidence.

To assure itself that the NFSA does not come undone in future years, the NAC will need to set the course for this second 'revolution' and push the government to procure more.

The latter is beset with macroeconomic concerns of how increased government purchase will hit prices and inflation.

Page 86: Indian food-security-debate-2010

86

Enhancing production alongside will become

mandatory.

This would be the toughest bit to ensure because

these issues will lie beyond the mandate of the

NFSA. They would have to be embedded in an

overall economic policy shift that will require

increased budgetary allocations to agriculture,

combined with the same intellectual vigour that

India witnessed during the first green revolution.

Page 87: Indian food-security-debate-2010

87

For India, with nearly fifty per cent children underweight,

to make freedom from hunger a legal right is a golden dream that needs hard work to realize it.

It involves besides an universal PDS, many interventions & entitlements like

Child nutrition,

Social security,

Health care and even

Proper rights. Framing National Food Security Act requires creative work, public debate and political commitment.

Page 88: Indian food-security-debate-2010

Average daily net per capita availability of food grains in India

• Average daily net per capita availability of food grains in India between 2005 and 2008 was 436 grams/Indian.

• That was less than it was half a century ago.

• In 1955-58 it was 440 grams.

• Take pulses separately and the fall is 50 %. Around 35 grams in 2005-08 from nearly 70 grams in 1955-58.

88

Page 89: Indian food-security-debate-2010

89

Page 90: Indian food-security-debate-2010

90

• The Food Corporation of India (FCI) procures food grains from the farmers at the government announced minimum support price (MSP). The MSP should ideally be at a level where the procurement by FCI and the offtake from it are balanced.

• The responsibility for procuring and stocking of food grains lies with the FCI and for distribution with the public distribution system (PDS).

• To reduce the fiscal deficit, the government has sought to curtail the food subsidy bill by raising the issue price of food grains (to APL people) and linking it to the economic cost at which the FCI supplies food grains to the PDS. The economic cost comprises the cost of procurement, that is, MSP, storage, transportation and administration and is high.

Page 91: Indian food-security-debate-2010

91

• When the issue price to APL category goes higher

than the market rates and to BPL category beyond

their purchasing power, resulting in plummeting of

offtake from the PDS.

• There is a need to shift from the existing expensive,

inefficient and corruption ridden institutional

arrangements to those that will ensure cheap

delivery of requisite quality grains in a transparent

manner and are self-targeting.

Page 92: Indian food-security-debate-2010

92

• It would be sobering for economists to look at the

expenditures that some of the most prosperous

countries in the world are incurring to stave hunger

and protect children and adult populations from

hunger.

• Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Orissa and Tamil Nadu

are four states with four different political parties in

power, have led the way in covering larger numbers

of poor and admittedly, better provisioning of food

grain.

Page 93: Indian food-security-debate-2010

Framing National Food Security Act (Gaze at Crystal ball)

• The proposal by the Planning Commission, that the Tendulkar committee figures for those living below the poverty line be the cut off for providing food grains at Rs 3 per kg, could now get greater weightage.

• The favoured proposal may recommend that only 33% of the urban population be provided subsidized grains and provide differential services to different income segments.

• The proposal may allow for the rural population living above the Tendulkar poverty line -- or Above Poverty Line beneficiaries -- to get only 25 kg of food grain, at a higher rate.

• These steps, if accepted, would radically reduce the number of beneficiaries of the proposed Act as well as pare down the government's annual subsidy bill by Rs 15,000-20,000 crore.

93