induction. inductive arguments increase the strength of your belief in some fact –inductive...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Induction. Inductive arguments increase the strength of your belief in some fact –Inductive arguments are not truth-preserving What sorts of factors should](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cfe5503460f949cecf8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Induction
![Page 2: Induction. Inductive arguments increase the strength of your belief in some fact –Inductive arguments are not truth-preserving What sorts of factors should](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cfe5503460f949cecf8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Induction
• Inductive arguments increase the strength of your belief in some fact– Inductive arguments are not truth-preserving
• What sorts of factors should increase your confidence in some fact?
![Page 3: Induction. Inductive arguments increase the strength of your belief in some fact –Inductive arguments are not truth-preserving What sorts of factors should](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cfe5503460f949cecf8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Justifications
• Inductive arguments influence degree of belief
• Must keep track of why we believe certain facts– AI has a field of truth maintenance– Gilbert
• Facts are believed to be true by default
• They must be specifically marked as false
– There is a persistence of false-beliefs• Johnson & Seifert
• Information continued to influence people’s beliefs unless they were given a specific reason why it was false.
![Page 4: Induction. Inductive arguments increase the strength of your belief in some fact –Inductive arguments are not truth-preserving What sorts of factors should](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cfe5503460f949cecf8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Coherence
• A coherent story makes beliefs stronger
• Pennington & Hastie– Story model of jury decision making
![Page 5: Induction. Inductive arguments increase the strength of your belief in some fact –Inductive arguments are not truth-preserving What sorts of factors should](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cfe5503460f949cecf8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Category-based induction
![Page 6: Induction. Inductive arguments increase the strength of your belief in some fact –Inductive arguments are not truth-preserving What sorts of factors should](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cfe5503460f949cecf8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Category-based induction
• Our category structures help us predict.
Bears have glutamate in their brainsHow likely is it that deer have glutamate in their brains?
Bears have glutamate in their brainsHow likely is it that deer have glutamate in their brains?
• How can you answer this question?– What if you know nothing about the property?
• These are called blank predicates
– What if you do have some relevant knowledge?
![Page 7: Induction. Inductive arguments increase the strength of your belief in some fact –Inductive arguments are not truth-preserving What sorts of factors should](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cfe5503460f949cecf8/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Induction with blank predicates• When we know nothing about the property,
we rely in similarities among categories
Bears have XHorses have X
Stronger Weaker
Bears have XBirds have X Similarity
Bears have XHorses have XLizards have X
Bears have XBirds have XLizards have X
Diversity
Bears have XMammals have X
Prairie Dogs have XMammals have X
Typicality
![Page 8: Induction. Inductive arguments increase the strength of your belief in some fact –Inductive arguments are not truth-preserving What sorts of factors should](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cfe5503460f949cecf8/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Similarity and coverage
• Why are these effects obtained?– Osherson, Smith, and colleagues
• Similarity-coverage model– The more similar the premise categories to the
conclusion, the stronger the argument– The better the premise categories cover the
category contained by the conclusion, the stronger the argument.
![Page 9: Induction. Inductive arguments increase the strength of your belief in some fact –Inductive arguments are not truth-preserving What sorts of factors should](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cfe5503460f949cecf8/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
What about non-blank predicates?• Sometimes we know a little bit about the properties
– How does that affect induction?
• Heit and Rubinstein– Behavioral and morphological properties– Behavioral and morphological similarity
Stronger Weaker
Dolphins have antifreeze in their blood______________Sharks have antifreeze...
Foxes have antifreeze in their blood_____________Sharks have antifreeze...
Foxes are good trackersSharks are good trackers
Dolphins are good trackersSharks are good trackers
![Page 10: Induction. Inductive arguments increase the strength of your belief in some fact –Inductive arguments are not truth-preserving What sorts of factors should](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cfe5503460f949cecf8/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
What if you know a lot?• Experts act differently than novices
– Similarity becomes far less important– Causal reasoning based on domain knowledge
• Premise diversity effects disappear in expertsWhite Pines get Disease XWeeping Willows get Disease XAll Trees get Disease X
River Birch get Disease YPaper Birch get Disease YAll Trees get Disease Y
• College students prefer argument on left– Consistent with diversity
• Tree experts prefer argument on right– Consistent with their causal reasoning.
![Page 11: Induction. Inductive arguments increase the strength of your belief in some fact –Inductive arguments are not truth-preserving What sorts of factors should](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082816/56649cfe5503460f949cecf8/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)