inflation hedging it & trading it - company – deutsche...

Deutsche Bank Corporate and Investment Bank

Inflation Hedging it & Trading it

Inflation —Hedging it & Trading it Deutsche Bank

Introduction Why inflation, why now?

1.0 Deutsche Bank’s capabilities and credentials in this market 1.1 How Deutsche Bank’s inflation offering differs from competitors 2.0 Market Overview – the rise and rise of inflation volatility 2.1 Components of Inflation indices

3.0 Inflation Linked Bonds 3.1 Inflation Linked Bonds 3.2 Real Yield and Breakeven Inflation and Inflation Protection 3.3 Indexation and Breakeven Inflation 3.4 Risk Measures, EM Sovereign Linkers, Seasonality, and US TIPS 3.5 UK Index Linked Gilts, EUR Sovereign Linkers, and other Important Markets 3.6 ILB coupon frequency and settlement characteristics

4.0 Inflation Swaps 4.1 ILS Swaps and Markets 4.2 UK Swaps, Corporate Linkers, and US Swaps 4.3 ILS Indexation 4.4 ILS Pension Fund demand

5.0 Assessing Relative Value 5.1 Linker Asset Swaps and the Leverage Effect 5.2 5 sources of Asset Swap Difference 5.3 What is the ‘Fair’ Price for Inflation Protection? 5.4 Fair Credit Spread of Inflation Linked Bonds 5.5 Hedge with Bonds or Swaps 5.6 Summary

6.0 Inflation Options 6.1 Inflation Options 6.2 Who are the major players in the options market? 6.3 Option Products 6.4 What are the trading opportunities? 6.5 Option Strategies 6.6 Creating Optimal Hedges

7.0 Deflation tail risk 7.1 Deflation Tail Risk: DB 5 Year Note 8.0 Case Study – Zero-Coupon Option Trade

9.0 Further Reading 9.1 Inflation Hedging for Institutional Investors

10.0 Contacts 10.1 Deutsche Bank Global Inflation Team

Contents

Inflation —Hedging it & Trading it Deutsche Bank 4

There has never been a better time to talk about inflation:

– Inflation has been running above central bank targets again – At the same time monetary policy seems to be constrained by high unemployment, elevated debt levels and fragile financial markets – Higher uncertainty about the inflation outlook raises the incentive to hedge inflation risks – Any investor with a bond portfolio is exposed.

Deutsche Bank is very strongly positioned to advise clients on what to do:

– We were recently voted Interest Rate Derivatives House of the Year by Risk Magazine – We have a large global inflation derivatives trading and structuring team – We have extensive experience of helping clients find inflation solutions.

The Deutsche Bank inflation team has developed this briefing document to:

– Set out the challenges and opportunities faced by clients – Explain the products and strategies we have developed.

The Deutsche Bank Global Inflation team can help.

Introduction Why inflation, why now?

Interest Rate Derivatives House of the Year

1Deutsche Bank’s credentials and capabilities in the Inflation marketHow Deutsche Bank’s inflation offerings differ from competitors


We offer a full range of inflation services Our primary capabilities are demonstrated by our leading position in the league tables; we’ve also played an important role in maintaining order

Date DealNo. Leads

DB UBS RBS Barc HSBC GS JPM Nomura BNPPCredit Agricole

BOA SG Calyon MPS RBC CS ING Citi MS Others

24 Sep 09 UKTI50 4 1 1 1 1

29 Sep 09 ACGBi25 3 1 1 1

21 Oct 09 BTPei41 4 1 1 1 1

27 Jan 10 UKTI40 4 1 1 1 1

21 Apr 10 BTPei21 5 1 1 1 1 1

11 May 10 UKRAIL47 2 1 1

26 May 10 UKTI50 4 1 1 1 1

27 Jul 10 UKTI40 4 1 1 1 1

14 Sep 10 ACGBi30 3 1 1 1

27 Jan 11 UKTI55 4 1 1 1 1 1

09 Feb 11 OATei27 5 1 1 1 1 1

24 May 11 UKTI34 4 1 1 1 1

08 Jun 11 BTPei26 5 1 1 1 1 1

26 Jul 11 UKTI34 4 1 1 1 1

25 Oct 11 UKTI62 4 1 1 1 1

22 Nov 11 UKTI29 4 1 1 1 1

Total number 7 8 9 5 7 4 3 3 4 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

in the secondary markets, distributing and recycling bonds and swaps across the world. DB is the global leader in inflation-linked bond syndication.

Issuing long dated inflation in large sizes can be difficult to manage; debt managers turn to the strongest banks who have the best track record for risk management and distribution – Deutsche Bank leads in this space Lead syndication mandates awarded to market counterparties

*between September 2009 and November 2011 Source: Bloomberg, Deutsche Bank

Deutsche Bank’s credentials and capabilities in the Inflation Market

1.0 Deutsche Bank’s credentials and capabilities in the Inflation Market


We are outperforming the competition around the world Deutsche Bank is: – No 1 in ICAP market share for EUR Inflation/Asset Swaps (2009, 2010) – No 3 in ICAP market share for UKRPI Inflation/Asset Swaps (2009, 2010) – No 1 in BGC market share for all US products (Inflation, Asset Swaps, Options) 2010 Fig.1: Global Linker Syndications as Lead Manager Source: Bloomberg, Deutsche Bank

Deutsche Bank Competitors

Fig. 2: Total Syndication Size for Global Linkers (mm) Source: Bloomberg, Deutsche Bank


Fig. 3: USD Inflation Market by Volume 2011 Source: Bloomberg, Deutsche Bank


DB

UB

S

RB

S

Bar

c

HS

BC

GS

JPM

No

mu

ra SG

BN

PP

RB

C

Cal

yon

MP

S

Oth

ers

ING

CS

CA

4

2

0

6

8

10

12 Number ofSyndications

MS

ML

9,000

8,000

7,000

6,000

5,000

4,000

3,000

2,000

1,000

DB

UB

S

RB

S

Bar

c

HS

BC

GS

JPM

No

mu

ra

BN

PP

Cit

i

SG

ML

MS

RB

C

Cal

yon

Oth

ers

ING

CS

CA

MP

STotal SyndicationSize

0 0

30,000

25,000

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000



We are outperforming the competition in the UK Fig. 1: UK Linkers Syndications as Lead Manager Source: Bloomberg, Deutsche Bank


Fig. 2: UK Linkers and Nominals Syndications as Lead Manager Source: Bloomberg, Deutsche Bank


Fig. 3: UK Linkers Total Syndication Size (mm) Source: Bloomberg, Deutsche Bank


Fig. 4: UK Linkers and Nominals Syndications as Lead Manager Source: Bloomberg, Deutsche Bank


DB UBS RBS Barc HSBC GS JPM BNPNomura

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0


8,000

7,000

6,000

5,000

4,000

3,000

2,000

1,000

0


6,000

5,000

4,000

3,000

2,000

1,000

0

6

5

4

3

2

1


0



Integrated trading, structuring and research Unlike some of our competitors, Deutsche Bank’s inflation trading, structuring and research professionals work closely together, combining strategic and technical expertise with the macro-economic insights so important to this offering.

Bloomberg Forecasts, inflation linked bonds, inflation swaps and inflation linked options (figure 1)

The market is pricing much more upside risk than downside risk – contrary to what we see in other markets

Trade Finder State of the art inflation analytics, from bond carry and butterfly scans, to forward matrices for the main inflation swap markets (figure 2)

Fig. 1: Our inflation page on Bloomberg DBII

Fig. 2: Inflation on Trade Finder


2Market Overview

Components of Inflation indices


All G7 nations issue inflation-linked bonds

Markets US TIPS – the US Sovereign linker market is the largest globally with a total market value of over USD700bn.

UK – IL Gilts – first issuance 1981; total market value exceeds GBP270bn

EUR sovereign linkers - total market value exceeding EUR320bn as of now; France, Italy, & Germany issue ILBs. Italian, German and Greek ILBs are linked to euro area inflation; France issues bonds linked to EUR inflation and bonds linked to FRF inflation

Industrial country sovereign linker markets – Other important markets include Australia, Canada and Sweden. AUD: govt suspended issuance in 2003, started again in 2009. Sweden: linkers account for almost 30% of total govt bond market, higher share than in any other industrial market

EM sovereign linker markets - most LatAm inflation markets have long histories; Brazil is the largest market, suppression of investment restrictions in 2006 spurred international demand. Chile, Colombia & Uruguay also issue ILB. Israel is big (USD27bn market value). More recently: South Africa, Poland, Turkey (2007) and South Korea (2007)

Fig. 1: A Fast Growing Asset Class Source: Deutsche Bank

US ITL UK DEM JPY Gr FRF SEK CAD AUD

2.0 Market Overview – the rise and rise of market volatility

‘97 ‘98 ‘99 ‘00 ‘09 ‘11‘10‘01 ‘02 ‘03 ‘04 ‘05 ‘06 ‘07 ‘08

0

1,800 total outstanding, $ bn

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,000

800

600

400

200


‘97 ‘98 ‘99 ‘00 ‘09 ‘10‘01 ‘02 ‘03 ‘04 ‘05 ‘06 ‘07 ‘08

0

1,600

1,200

1,400

1,000

800

600

400

200

%

Food and beveragesHousingApparelTransportationMedical CareRecreation

Other

Education andCommunication

15

41

4

4

17

7

6

6

‘97 ‘98 ‘99 ‘00 ‘09 ‘10‘01 ‘02 ‘03 ‘04 ‘05 ‘06 ‘07 ‘08

Food

Alcoholic drinks

HousingFuel & light

Catering

Cigarettes & tobacco

Clothing & footwearPersonal goods & servicesMotoring expendituresFares & other travel costsLeisure goodsLeisure services

Household goodsHousehold services

14

4

4

4

6

6

7

24

26

3

4

4

%

12

Food & beverages

Clothing & footwear

Furniture & household goods/maintenenceHealth

Alcohol & tobacco

Housing, water, electricity & other fuels

Recreation & cultureEducationRestaurants & hotelsOther goods & services

TransportCommunication

%13

4

6

6

12

16

15

23

2

129

2.1 Market Overview – the rise and rise of market volatility

Fig. 3: US: RPI Source: Deutsche Bank

Fig. 1: UK: CPI Source: Deutsche Bank

Fig. 2: UK: RPI Source: Deutsche Bank

3Inflation Linked Bonds

Inflation Linked Bonds Real Yield and Breakeven Inflation and Inflation Protection Indexation and Breakeven Inflation Risk Measures, EM Sovereign Linkers, Seasonality and US TIPS UK Index Linked Gilts, EUR Sovereign and other Important Markets ILB coupon frequency and settlement characteristics


Inflation Bonds ‘Linkers’ Inflation Linked Bonds (also known as inflation indexed bonds) or ‘Linkers’.

These are Treasury bonds designed to cancel the capital eroding effects of inflation. Called TIPS (Treasury Inflation Protection Securities) in the US, their interest rate remains fixed but the principal is adjusted to match changes in a price index.

For example: A vanilla fixed rate bond pays a fixed coupon and redeems at 100 – Interest Paid = Fixed Rate * Constant – Notional (e.g. 5% * 100 = 5) – Redemption = Constant Notional (e.g. 100)

A ‘Canadian style’ Linker pays a ‘real’ coupon and redeems at 100 in ‘real’ terms – Index Ratio = CPI Index on Payment Date / CPI Index on Issue Date – Interest Paid = Fixed Rate * Inflated Notional – = Fixed Rate * Notional * Index Ratio (e.g. 2% * 100 * 1.5 = 3) – Redemption = 100 * Index Ratio (e.g. 100 * 1.5 = 150)

Some ILBs (like US TIPS or OATei/i) have a deflation floor, meaning a principal repayment of minimum par is guaranteed by the issuer

Fig. 1: Vanilla Fixed Rate Bond versus Inflation Linked Bond Source: Deutsche Bank

Real Nominal

3.1 Inflation Linked Bonds

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10

6%

5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%

Year

7%

8%

9%

10% Coupon Principal

80%

60%

40%

20%

0

100%

120%

140%

160%


Real Yield and Breakeven Inflation Components of nominal interest rate: – Real yield – Expected Inflation – Risk Premium – Liquidity Premium

Issuing nominals means investors need compensation for inflation uncertainty.

Linkers save issuers the risk premium by providing certainty about real cash flows in the future i.e. their increase in purchasing power is ‘locked in’. (figure 1) Fig. 1: Components of Nominal Yield Source: Deutsche Bank

Inflation Protection With positive inflation, the ILB’s cash flows will increase over time to secure the investor’s purchasing power.

Compared to a nominal bond early coupon payments will tend to be lower, and the final repayment will tend to be higher.

The examples below assume an annual coupon and inflation at 2%. (figures 2 and 3) Fig. 2: Nominal cash flows Source: Deutsche Bank

Coupon Linker (2%) Notional Conventional (rhs) Coupon Conventional Bond (4%) Notional Linker (rhs)

Fig. 3: Real cash flows (purchasing power of the CFs) Source: Deutsche Bank

Coupon Linker (2%) Notional Conventional (rhs) Coupon Conventional Bond (4%) Notional Linker (rhs)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10

6%

5%

4%

3%

2%

1%

0%

7%

8%

9%

Nominal Yield

Breakeven RateIndex Linked Bond

RealYield

Inflation Expectations

RiskPremium Liquidity

Premium

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 not’l10

60

40

20

0

80

100

120

140

6

4

2

0

8

10

12

14

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 not’l10

60

40

20

0

80

100

120

6

4

2

0

8

10

12



Indexation To offer inflation protection you need to: (i) choose a price index, (ii) define precise linking rules.

Price index: typically a non-seasonally adjusted, official consumer price index

Indexation: the ‘Canadian’ model is now the benchmark, adopted among others by TIPS, EUR ILBs and new UKTi (figure 1) – Problem: CPI only monthly and published with a delay – The price factor used to inflation adjust cash flows, the ‘Daily Inflation Reference’ (DIR), is a linear interpolation of the two monthly values of the official price index three months earlier and two months earlier, e.g.: – The DIR for 1 June is the official CPI March (released mid-April) – The DIR for 1 July is the official CPI April (released mid-May) – The DIR for 23 June is : CPI(Mar) + 22/30 * [CPI(Apr) – CPI(Mar)]

Breakeven Inflation Canadian style linkers are quoted in real terms and the real price (P) - real yield (r) relationship is equivalent to that of a conventional bond (c: coupon):

ILBs’ value is often expressed in terms of inflation rather than in terms of real yields by considering the difference in yield between nominal and real bonds.

BEI (Breakeven Inflation) is the inflation rate that equates the expected return of an ILB and a comparable nominal bond; i.e. if actual inflation until maturity exceeds BEI, linkers outperform nominals.

In practice, the market looks at simple yield spreads (figure 2).

Fig. 1: Indexation Source: Deutsche Bank

Fig. 2: BEI ≈ nominal yield – real yield Source: Deutsche Bank

Real Yield Nominal Yield

Jan ‘04 Jun ‘04 Nov ‘04 Apr ‘05 Sep ‘05 Feb ‘06 Jul ‘06

100

99

98

97

96

101

102

103

BTP

ei 0

8

BTA

Nei

10

BTP

ei 1

0

OA

Tei 1

2

BTP

ei 1

2

OB

Lei 1

3

BTP

ei 1

4

OA

Tei 1

5

DB

Rei

16

BTP

ei 1

7

OA

Tei 2

0

BTP

ei 2

3

GG

Bei

25

OA

Tei 3

2

BTP

ei 3

5

OA

Tei 4

0

Breakeven Inflation

%

4.54.03.53.02.5

1.52.0

1.0

5.05.56.0



Risk Measures – The concepts of duration and convexity can be applied to linkers in the same way as for conventional bonds – But in the case of linkers, duration describes the sensitivity of the price to a change in the real rate – Linkers have a higher duration than same maturity conventionals – Convexity rises exponentially with duration, for the same maturity ILBs have a higher convexity than nominals

EM Sovereign Linker Markets – Most Latin American inflation markets have long histories; Brazil is by far the largest market, suppression of investment restrictions in 2006 spurred international demand – Chile, Colombia & Uruguay also issue ILB – Israel has a large linker market (USD27bn market value) – More recently South Africa, Poland, Turkey (2007) and South Korea (2007)

Seasonality – Seasonal movements in price indices mean that inflation accrual is not linear – Quoted real yields of ILB adjust to the changing inflation uplift – real yields & BEI exhibit seasonal patterns – detecting the seasonal pattern in prices is important for valuing ILBs – Estimation of seasonal factors is not without difficulties, especially in the euro area where there is instability – There is no consensus on their precise value

US TIPS – The US sovereign linker market is the largest globally with total market value in excess of USD700bn (figure 1) – TIPS were first issued in 1997; in recent years, there have been two 5y, two 20y and four 10y auctions per year; in February 2010 30y TIPS were reintroduced, replacing the 20y – Maturities range from 1y to 30y

Fig. 1: US TIPS total outstanding market value Source: US Treasury


2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20112010

300

200

100

0

400

500

600

700

800 USDbn


UK Index Linked Gilts – The UK linker market is the oldest in Europe (first issuance 1981) – Total market value exceeds GBP270bn and more than 20% of sovereign debt is linked to inflation – Traditionally bonds have an 8M indexation lag, but since Sep 2005 all new issues follow the 3M lag model; UKTi have no deflation floor – Issuance has been weighted towards the long end – Maturities range from 1Y to 50Y, with issues available on all main curve points (figure 1)

Fig. 1: UK Total Outstanding Market Value Source: UK DMO

EUR Sovereign Linkers – Euro area sovereign inflation-linked bond (ILB) markets are expanding rapidly with the total market value exceeding EUR320bn today – France, Italy, Germany & Greece issue ILBs – Italian, German and Greek ILBs are linked to euro area inflation; France issues both bonds linked to EUR inflation and bonds linked to FRF inflation – Maturities range from 1Y to 32Y, with issues available on all main points on the curve (figures 2 and 3)

Fig. 2: EUR Sovereign Linker Issuance Source: National Treasury

FR DE IT GR EUR (rhs)

Other important markets include Australia, Canada and Sweden – AUD: govt suspended issuance in 2003, but started again in 2009. Strong liability related demand from PF and insurance companies – Sweden: linkers account for almost 30% of the total government bond market, a higher share than in any other industrial market

Fig. 3: Sovereign Linkers, Outstanding Volume Source: National Treasury

Germany Fr (FRCPIxt) France Italy Greece

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20112010

50

0

100

150

300

200

250

350 USDbn

201120102009200820072006200520042003

5

10

15

0

20

25

50

100

150

0

200

250

300

350Linker IssuanceEURbn

Total Outstanding, excl GreeceEURbn

2031

2033

2015

2017

2019

2021

2023

2025

2027

2029

2035

2039

2037

2041

5

10

15

0

20

25

30

35

40 EURbn

2013



Price index BBG Index lag Deflation floor Coupon

US CPI-U CPURNSA 3M YES semi-ann

UK RPI UKRPI 8M/3M NO semi-ann

FRCPI x tob, FR FRCPXTOB 3M YES annual

HICP x tob, EMU CPTFEMU 3M YES annual

IT HICP x tob, EMU CPTFEMU 3M YES semi-ann

JP CPI x fresh food JCPNJGBI 3M NO semi-ann

SE CPI SWCPI 3M YES (new ILB) annual

CA CPI CACPI 3M NO semi-ann

GR HICP x tob, EMU CPTFEMU 3M YES annual

DE HICP x tob, EMU CPTFEMU 3M YES annual

AU CPI quarterly ACIF 6M YES quarterly


Most ILBs have coupon frequency and settlement characteristics in line with the nominal market

ILB coupon frequency and settlement characteristics

4Inflation Swaps

ILS Swaps and Markets UK Swaps, Corporate Linkers and US Swaps ILS Indexation ILS Pension Fund Demand


Inflation Linked Swaps (ILS) – a pure inflation product as opposed to a real rate product

What is an Inflation Swap? The cash-flows – Receive Compounded Inflation from Start to Maturity: pay one cash-flow – CPIt/CPI0 -1 – Pay a known Fixed cash-flow at Maturity – (1 + X%)^t

What is the break-even rate? – Receive Compounded Inflation from Start to Maturity: pay one cash-flow – CPIt/CPI0 -1 – Pay a known Fixed cash-flow at Maturity – (1 + X%)^t

ILS Markets The most liquid ILS are typically those linked to the same price index as the inflation-linked government bonds of the corresponding market (US CPI-U, EUR HICP ex-tobacco, French CPI ex tobacco, UK RPI).

For the major markets, ZC ILS are usually quoted for tenors out to 30 years, sometimes 50 years.

Fig. 1: Inflation Swaps

(1+BEI)N–1

Fixed

Floating

Client

CPI(N)

CPI(0)–1

4.1 Inflation Swaps


UK Swaps and Corporate Linkers Non-sovereign inflation supply in bonds & swaps has grown rapidly in the UK in particular 2006 and H107

MarketPrice Index

Lag CPI Fixing

US CPI-U 3M Interpolated

Euro areaHICP ex tobacco

3M Straight

FranceCPI ex

tobacco3M Interpolated

UK RPI 2M Straight

US Swaps The inflation swap market has developed rapidly from 2004, but remains less liquid than its European counterparts

A lack of ‘natural’ inflation swap supply translates into structural richness in swap BEI vs bond BEI… and wide linker ASW discounts Fig. 1: Bond Breakevens vs Swap Breakevens Source: Deutsche Bank

USCPI ZC swap rates TIPS-implied ZC B/E

Fig. 2: Measures of Relative Value: ASW Spread and Z-spread Source: Deutsche Bank

US Linker Z-spread discount US Linker ASW discount

4.2 Inflation Swaps

01 J

an 1

4

01 J

an 1

6

01 J

an 1

8

01 J

an 2

0

01 J

an 2

2

01 J

an 2

4

01 J

an 2

6

01 J

an 2

8

01 J

an 3

0

01 J

an 3

2

01 J

an 3

4

01 J

an 3

6

01 J

an 3

8

01 J

an 4

0

01 J

an 4

2

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0 %

TII A

pr

13

TII Ju

l 13

TII Ja

n 1

4TI

I A

pr

14

TII Ju

l 14

TII Ja

n 1

5TI

I A

pr

15

TII Ju

l 15

TII Ja

n 1

6TI

I Ju

l 16

TII Ja

n 1

7TI

I Ju

l 17

70

60

50

40

30

20

-10

10

0

80

TII Ja

n 1

8TI

I Ju

l 18

TII Ja

n 1

9TI

I Ju

l 19

TII Ja

n 2

0TI

I Ju

l 20

TII Ja

n 2

1TI

I Ja

n 2

5TI

I Ja

n 2

6TI

I Ja

n 2

7TI

I Ja

n 2

8TI

I A

pr

28

TII Ja

n 2

9TI

I A

pr

29

TII A

pr

32

TII Fe

b 4

0TI

I Fe

b 4

1


ILS Indexation For FRCPIxt & US CPI, the indexation lag convention is the same as for the corresponding inflation-linked bond markets – Strong demand has led to a low level of real interest rates, lock in low financing costs – PFI projects with inflation component (usually bonds, but typically transformed into ASW) – Credit wrapping allowed corporates to issue highly rated debt which is more appealing to institutional investors

But has fallen significantly during the credit crisis

Main sources: regulated utilities, PFIs, property leases, railway companies, retailers, supranationals

Alternative supply has led to two-way swap market and narrow swap-bond B/E spread, but swap richness has increased again during the crisis

4.3 Inflation Swaps

ILS Indexation


ILS Pension Fund demand – In the UK, pension indexation to RPI (LPI) is more explicit than elsewhere and the pension industry is larger than in other European countries – Accounting rules (‘Financial Reporting Standard 17’) have encouraged pension funds to match their indexed liabilities more closely – As a result, demand growth from pension funds and life insurers has outstripped supply leading to low real yields and expensive BEI at the long-end of the curve But has fallen significantly during the credit crisis – Long-term investors own the majority of ILB as a hedge for their real liabilities

Fig. 1: Real Yields Source: Deutsche Bank

US UK France

Fig. 2: UK Non-sovereign Inflation Supply Source: Deutsche Bank

UK Non-sovereign inflation supply

Fig. 3: UK Non-sovereign Inflation Supply Source: Deutsche Bank

Other Rail Utility

4.4 Inflation Swaps

-4.0

-3.5

-3.0

-2.5

-2.0

-1.5

0

-0.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

%

2009 2023 2036 2050 2064 Q311Q305 Q306 Q307 Q308 Q309 Q310

500

1,000

1,500

0

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000 GBPm

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20112010

6,000

5,000

4,000

3,000

2,000

1,000

0

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000 IssuanceGBPm

5Assessing Relative Value

Linker Asset Swap and the Leverage Effect 5 Sources of Asset Swap Difference What is the ‘Fair’ Price for Inflation Protection? Fair Credit Spread of Inflation Linked Bonds Hedge with Bonds or Swaps Summary


Linker Asset Swap – Investor buys an Inflation Bond – Investor agrees to pay away all the cash-flows (P+I) from the bond – Investor receives in return Libor + x% until maturity as well as a principal payment

The Leverage Effect Sophisticated investors may not be able to borrow to buy additional nominal bonds due to constraints, hence are willing to give up some of their excess return

Some investors just like the pick-up over equivalent tenor nominal bonds on asset swap (figure 2)

For example This is how we expect a Linker to increase in the Eurozone over time

Why is this important? Sovereign default is currently very real possibility… like for like exposures need to be carefully assessed for fair value – some investors have increased credit risk for very little reward

Fig. 1: Linker Asset Swap Source: Deutsche Bank

Fig. 2: The Leverage Effect Source: Deutsche Bank

Inflation Libor

5.1 Assessing Relative Value

Libor + X

Inflated Notional Inflated Notional

Notional

InvestorLinker

CPICPI

0 5 10 15 20 25

Constant Swap Notional

Increasing Credit Exposure

30 35 40Years 45 50

150

100

50

0

200

250

300

350 Notional

“The increasing credit exposure, and thereby return, on a linker asset swap generates significant outperformance…”

– Daragh McDevitt, Global Head of Inflation Structuring


5 Sources of Asset Swap Difference

PV01 difference – Linkers have a higher duration

Swap richness – The spread between inflation-linked swaps and implied bond break-evens gives rise to different asset swap levels for linkers and nominals – It also usually tells the story of swap supply and demand…

Seasonality – See the section on page 3.4

Credit / Liquidity – Mis-priced credit cost leading to ‘value’ for issuers

Tax – Favourable deferrals for issuers encourage supply

The difference between a nominal asset swap and a Linker Asset Swap of the same maturity is a function of the larger credit exposure, the term structure of credit and the swap richness

For example 20 bps richness results in an additional 28 bps on asset swap – a 40% increase

Fig. 1: Measures of Relative Value Source: Deutsche Bank

Adjusts for Dirty Price

Accounts for Cashflow

Pattern

Accounts for Term Structure

of Credit

Fair Value Discounting

Par par ASW

Net Proceeds ASW

√

Z spread √ √

‘Richness’ √ √ √ √


“Of these comparative measures… richness is the true measure”

– Stephane Salas, Global Head of Inflation Trading

5 Sources of Asset Swap Difference


What is the ‘Fair’ Price for Inflation Protection?

Inflation ‘Breakeven’ is not equal to market inflation expectations but is a factor of – Inflation expectations – ‘Risk Premium’ – ‘Liquidity Premium’

Inflation expectations over the very long run are hard to judge but tend to be based on current economic policy – ECB target rate is ‘under, but close to 2%’

Risk Premium includes – Potential change in monetary policy target (e.g. 4% plus or minus 1% instead of under 2%) – Abandonment of monetary policy in favour of employment or currency board – EUR breakup, expansion or succession – Asymmetric elasticity of inflation: wages are easier to raise than to cut

Liquidity premium includes – Relative demand and supply for inflation bonds v nominal bonds – Balance sheet costs of holding inflation bonds to recycle inflation – Opportunity cost of capital for cash used to hedge inflation


“The biggest mistake people make with inflation-linked bonds is thinking that the breakeven inflation is the market’s expected inflation rate. It is not and should not be. The breakeven includes what the market expects inflation to be and the major portion of the risk premium that you should find in the nominal market, and the liquidity premium”

– Markus Heider, Global Head of Inflation Research

What is the ‘Fair’ Price for Inflation Protection?


Fair Credit Spread of Inflation Linked Bonds Issuing Linkers equates to borrowing more over time in nominal terms i.e. it can be thought of as a set of forward starting bonds

Forward starting bonds = greater credit risk

Two components to fair price: – The issuer’s current credit spread for the maturity of the bond – Forward credit spreads for each of the forward starting borrowings i.e. forward credit spreads

A simple point, but investors may not recognise and price this correctly

Fig. 1: Linker as a Series of Forward Starting Bonds Source: Deutsche Bank

Initial Principal Amount Fwd Borrowing Year 1 Fwd Borrowing Year 2 Fwd Borrowing Year 3 Fwd Borrowing Year 4 Fwd Borrowing Year 5 Fwd Borrowing Year 6 Fwd Borrowing Year 7 Fwd Borrowing Year 8 Fwd Borrowing Year 9

Fig. 2: Creating a synthetic 30-year old Nominal Bond Source: Deutsche Bank


0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Years 9 10

60

40

20

0

80

100

120

140 Borrowed Amount

=

EUR 100mm

EUR 25mm

EUR 25mm

EUR 50mm

20y @ 130bp

10y @ 100bp 30y accreting @ 175bp

30y @ 150bp


The Question is… Hedge with Bonds or Swaps Traditionally, many investors have primarily considered inflation-linked bonds to hedge exposure

However, a more modern approach is: – Bonds can be cheaper or more expensive than swaps – Buy the cheapest asset – Hedge the inflation with swaps – Opportunistically switch between assets

This also gives a lot more flexibility to hedge the desired cash flows, since at the long-end there are only relatively few bonds outstanding (and liquidity can be better as well)

Fig. 1: Swap Inflation Price – Bond Inflation Price Source: Deutsche Bank Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance

UK Italy France (French CPI) Germany France (Euro CPI)

The Bond Universe Value within the UK – for example Figures 3 and 4 on the right depict the value that can be created by switching between similar maturity nominal and inflation linked bonds.

Figure 2 below depicts the value in switching between short and long maturity linkers.

In terms of trading capability, how does this work? We should always be free to switch between UK Bonds and UK Linkers

Fig. 2 : PV Gain of UKTi40 over the UKTi27 Source: Deutsche Bank Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance

Switch in Switch out

Fig. 3: PV Gain of UKTi27 over the UKT27 Source: Deutsche Bank Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance


Fig. 4: PV Gain of UKTi40 over the UKT40 Source: Deutsche Bank Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance



Nov

10

May

16

Oct

21

Ap

r 27

Oct

32

Ap

r 38

Sep

43

Mar

49

Sep

54

Feb

60

40

20

0

60

80

120

100

140

-20

1/10 3/10 5/10 7/10 9/10 11/10 1/11 1/1211/119/115/11 7/113/11

2

-2

0

4

6

8

10 PV Gain (%)

1/10 3/10 5/10 7/10 9/10 11/10 1/11 1/1211/119/115/11 7/113/11

2

0

4

6

8

10

12

14 PV Gain (%)

1/10 3/10 5/10 7/10 9/10 11/10 1/11 1/1211/119/115/11 7/113/11

2

-2

0

4

6

8

10 PV Gain (%)


To sum up… – Given the displacement between inflation and nominal markets, there are opportunities for arbitrage – Asset swap spreads on linkers represent a premium for credit that is hard to price, and when coupled with demand/supply imbalances and higher duration, they offer a pickup to nominals for the same underlying issuer – Switching between equivalent risk sovereigns/supra sovereigns can often, driven by dynamics of the cross currency swaps market, provide additional yield pick-ups

– These displacements can be assessed by a variety of metrics – The value of switching is evident from the incremental excess pickup that is generated by selling the costlier asset to buy the cheapest asset from time to time – Used as a systematic strategy this can yield substantial returns over medium term horizons – These represent incredible opportunities for ‘asset-heavy’ investors, and the markets will likely normalize with time, hence it is important to act quickly


“There isn’t one risk free curve, there are 100, 150, 200… the key is when do you pick ‘the fruit’, when is the bond cheap enough?”

– Daragh McDevitt, Global Head of Inflation Structuring

“…there are incredible opportunities for asset-heavy investors…it is important to act quickly”

– Haroon Sana, Global Head of Rates Sales

Summary

6Inflation Options

Inflation Options Who are the major players in the options market? Option Products What are the trading opportunities? Option Strategies Creating Optimal Hedges


A relatively new market, inflation options traded between Europe and the US have doubled every year since trading started in inflation swaps in 2002/2003. 2010 saw a particular growth spurt.

Long term growth looks set to continue at this explosive rate, which is clearly indicative of its importance to clients and represents a substantial opportunity to DB as intermediary between buyers and sellers of inflation.

Interbank volumes reached 50bn in 2010, up from 13bn in 2009, and just 1bn in 2005.

Fig. 1: London Options Volumes Source: Tullett Prebon

Fig. 2: NY Options Volumes Source: Tullett Prebon

6.1 Inflation Options

01

/09

03

/09

05

/09

07

/09

09

/09

11

/09

01

/10

03

/10

05

/10

07

/10

09

/10

11

/10

01

/11

03

/11

400

200

600

0

800

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800 Volumes(millions)

01

/09

03

/09

05

/09

07

/09

09

/09

11

/09

01

/10

03

/10

05

/10

07

/10

09

/10

11

/10

01

/11

03

/11

1,000

2,000

0

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000 Volumes(millions)


The market is becoming more and more complex as sophisticated new players such as hedge funds, liability driven investors, and non-life insurance practitioners are added to the mix.

Any client: – holding a bond portfolio – subject to tail inflation – high or low – who has revenues or liabilities that are indexed to inflation is exposed to inflation risk


Hedge Fund Real Estate Investor

Asset Manager

Inflation Options Market

Insurance Company Pension Fund

Directional/RV Trades

Hedge LPIRevenues

Hedge LPILiabilities

Buy DeflationProtection

Monetize EmbeddedFloors


Year on Year cap/floor – YoY floorlet : Max [ K - YoYt , 0 ] – With YoYt = It/It-1 - 1 – A 5 year 0% YoY floor costs 140c or 30bps p.a. – Demand from retail notes >> Supply from premium sellers

Zero Coupon cap/floor – ZC floor: Max [ (1+K)^t - It/I0 , 0 ] – A 10 year 0% ZC floor costs 36c – Supply from linkers and asset swaps >> Demand from deflation hedgers

Limited Price Index (LPI) – LPIt = LPIt-1 * { 1 + max [ min [ YoYt , 5% ] , 0% ] } – Inflation observed annually, collared, compounded… and paid at maturity – Demand from LDI funds >> Supply from real estate investors

Fig. 1: 5y 0% YoY floor HICPxT Source: Deutsche Bank Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance

Fig. 2: 10y 0% ZC floor HICPxT Source: Deutsche Bank Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance

Fig. 3: Limited Price Index (LPI) Source: Deutsche Bank

Fig. 4: DB Inflation pages: DBII


07/09 01/10 07/10 01/11 07/11 01/12

40

20

60

80

0

100

120

-2%YoY Inflation -1% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7%

1.0

2.0

0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0 %

01/07 01/08 01/09 01/10 01/11 01/12

100

50

150

200

0

250

300

350

400 Price (bps)


LPI Collars represents a great inflation-hedging alternative Inflation risk for Pension funds and other liability-driven investors is big, 20 – 30% of scheme risk.

Breakevens are deemed expensive: if, for example, breakeven is 3.7% and the scheme expected inflation of 2.8%, hedging loses value (figure 1).

What’s the solution? Cover inflation risk by creating an inflation collar – Pay LPI – Receive RPI

Expert historical perspective Markus Heider, responsible for European inflation research at DB Global Markets Research, provides a useful long term perspective: this graph shows how the volatility we have seen in the last three years is nothing compared to the last 200 years. In the long run, inflation is a very volatile entity, which means risk and therefore, opportunity.

The relative stability we’ve seen in the last 20 years can very quickly change

Significant risk factors currently include governments with unsustainable deficits and globalisation; the need to hedge inflation risk is becoming increasingly relevant

Fig. 1: Assumed Constant Year on Year Inflation Return Source: Deutsche Bank

RPI ZC Swap 100% LPI Collar

Fig. 2: Consumer price inflation, y/y%, 11-yr MA Source: EH Net

UK US

1. US war of Independence 2. Napoleonic Wars deficit monetised 3. 1st Industrial Revolution: productivity-led deflation 4. US Civil War 5. 2nd Industrial Revolution: productivity rebounds; gold finds 6. Fiscal monetisation during WWI 7. Great Depression 8. Fiscal monetisation during WWII 9. Fiscal monetisation during Vietnam War; oil shocks 10. Volcker clamps down on inflation


-2%-3%-4% -1% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8%

-30

40

50

30

20

10

0

-10

-20

Payoff

30y Breakeven3.55%

180017751750 1825 1850 1875 1900 1925 1950 1975 2000

-10

15

10

5

0

-5

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

“The catalyst that makes this trade work is inflation at above 5% – this 5% strike is currently lower than spot inflation – a change from the last five years”

– Nicolas Tabardel, Global Head of Inflation Volatility and Exotics


Market vs Economist Expectations UK RPI future inflation: the market in the long term is pricing much more downside risk than upside risk. In the UK, the risks of inflation overshooting are much higher than them undershooting. This is contrary to what we see in other markets.

In Europe and the US, there is more balance; caps are becoming more much more expensive than floors.

Consensus economist predictions indicate that market implied volatility is too high; tails are too fat and the skew is too deep. Caps have no natural supply in Europe or the US so the tail risk is always expensive (figure 1).

In Europe, volatility is too high, tails are too fat, and the skew is too steep.

What does this mean? Selling volatility now is a good idea

The skew was pricing floors higher than caps; the skew is now symmetric (figure 2).

Fig. 1: Skew prices floors higher than caps Source: Deutsche Bank

SPF prob distribution for 5y infl forecast Market Implied Probability from EUR YoY caps/floors 1. Deflation risk is overpriced 2. Consensus economist predictions imply market implied volatility is too high 3. ‘Fat Tails’

Fig. 2: Ratio of market implied probability vs. Economist Expectations Source: Deutsche Bank


0

25

30

35

20

15

10

5

<0 0 - 0.5 1.0 - 1.5 2.0 - 2.5 3.0 - 3.5 >4

%

0

25

20

15

10

5

<0 0 - 0.5 0.5 - 1 1 - 1.5 1.5 - 2

Inflation Print (%)

Value in selling ‘wings’distribution i.e. far out ofthe money caps and floor

2 - 2.5 2.5 - 3 3 - 3.5 3.5 - 4 >4

30

“Tail risk continues to remain overpriced with both tails almost equally flat, reflecting the high uncertainty over the inflation/deflation debate”

– Nicolas Tabardel, Global Head of Inflation Volatility & Exotics


Collars (figure 1) – Sell Floor – Buy Cap

Strangles (figure 2) – Sell OTM Floor – Sell OTM Cap

Straddles – Sell Floor and Cap at same strike

Range Accruals – Pays N/12 * Fixed Rate, Annual – N = No. of months 1% < YoY EUR HICP <3% – 5y Note with DB funding, Fixed Rate = 3.25%

Fig. 1: Long (0,3) Collar Source: Deutsche Bank

Fig. 2: Short (0,3) Strangle Source: Deutsche Bank


-6

8

6

4

2

0

-2

-4

-5 -3 -2-4 -1 1 20 3 654 7 8 9 10

Payoff (%)

YoY Inflation Print (%)

-5

1

0

-1

-2

-3

-4

-5 -3 -2-4 -1 1 20 3 654 7 8

Payoff (%)



Building Blocks – Selling a 0% YoY floor – Selling a 1x / 2x cap spread

Premiums – 5Y 0% floor generates 120c – 5Y 2.5% cap costs 320c – 2x 5Y 5% cap costs 200c

Using these components… Zero cost and benefits from inflation between 2% and 7.5%

Covered Linker Switches – Sell nominal bond – Buy Linker – Sell year on year caps @ 2.5% on coupons and principal

OATei22 OATei32

Covered Caps (%) (%)

Upfront Premium 5.00% 14.90%

Running Premium (annual, 30/360) 53 bps 92 bps

Real Yield Pick-Up 43 bps 51 bps

Minimum Inflation to outperform nominal 1.49% 1.63%

Fig. 1: Sell 0% floor, But 1x/2x Cap Spread Source: Deutsche Bank


-1.5

3.0

1.5

2.5

1.0

-2.0

0.5

0.0

-0.5

-1.0

-2 -1 1 20 3 654 7 8 9 10

Payoff (%)


7Deflation Tail Risk

Deflation Tail Risk: DB 5 Year Note


Deflation tail risk: DB 5 Year Note Investors can take advantage of the substantial dislocations in the Inflation Option Market by selling deep out of the money Inflation Floors.

A 5 year DB Deflation Note provides a return over 3.5% per annum if YoY Eurozone Inflation prints above -2.0%, providing 235bps of pick up over 5y EUR Swap Rates.

Euro-zone inflation printing below -2.0% is an unprecedented event, never seen in ANY Euro economy.

The below note details indicative terms and compelling reasons for investors to take on this risk for above market returns. The last section looks at variations in USD, GBP in addition to alternate ways of monetizing the opportunity in EURs

The underlying market dislocations are unsustainable and will soon be removed by exogenous liquidity provided by real money accounts. This opportunity represents clear value.

DB Short Deflation Risk Note – Indicative Trade Terms

Indicatitive Terms

Currency EUR

Format DB Funded Note

Maturity 5 years

Issue Price 100.00

Re-Offer 99.00

Redemption121 - Floor(T), minimum

return of 0.00

Where

FLOOR(T)121 * Sum [Floor(t) for

t = 1,2,3,4,5]

Floor(t)12 * Max (Floor Strike - YoY

Inflation, 0%)

Floor Strike -2.00%

YoY Inflation

CPI(t) / CPI(t-1) -1 Where CPI(t) is the EUR HICP ex Tobacco Index (CPTFEMU Index) 3m

prior to Observation Date t CPI(t-1) is the EUR HICP ex Tobacco Index (CPTFEMU

Index) 15m prior to Observation Date t

Reference Rates 5y Inflation B/E 2.01% 5y Swap Rate 1.61% Max IRR 3.56%

7.1 Deflation Tail Risk

Deflation tail risk: DB 5 Year Note

8Case Study: Zero-Coupon Option Trade


During the first six months of 2010, a Toronto-based insurer purchased deflation protection worth $21.539 billion in notional, paying $173.7 million in premium. The 10-year zero-coupon 0% options were denominated in dollars, euros and sterling, and were executed by Deutsche Bank and Citi.

The other side of the trade was largely taken by California-based fixed-income manager Pimco, which reported it had sold more than $8 billion of 10-year zero-coupon 0% inflation floors in a filing dated August 27. The floors were sold in return for more than $70 million in premium, with Deutsche and Citi as counterparties.

The transaction made perfect sense for both participants. For the insurer, the 0% floors acted as a hedge against deflation and the impact that would have on its equity portfolio. At the same time, Pimco was able to cash in on 0% inflation floors embedded in its sizable portfolio of Treasury inflation-protected securities (Tips). Dealers say the headlines generated by the trade had a positive impact on the market, encouraging other clients to express

their views on the direction of inflation by buying or selling zero-coupon options.

Daragh McDevitt, DB Global Head of Inflation Structuring said, “It sparked interest because you have very intelligent investors on both sides who are taking opposite sides of the trade.”

Since Q2, 2010, quantitative easing has encouraged more clients to sell implied inflation volatility at levels that look expensive. In particular, many market players have looked to play inflation volatility versus interest rate volatility – for example, by buying interest rate caps and selling inflation caps at similar strikes. “We’ve seen a lot of clients coming in on the same side as Pimco, viewing the probability of deflation priced in by these options to be inflated. They are either selling the options embedded in their bond portfolios, selling the options outright or entering into some kind of interest rate options strategy,” says McDevitt.

The transaction made perfect sense for both participants. For the insurer, the 0% floors acted as a hedge against deflation and the impact that would have on its equity portfolio. At the same time, Pimco was able to cash in on 0% inflation floors embedded in its sizable portfolio of Treasury inflation-protected securities.

8.1 Case Study

Case Study: Zero-Coupon Option Trade


9Further Reading


Inflation Hedging for Institutional Investors Examining dynamic asset allocation strategies for high inflation scenarios and the effect of financial market changes on inflation hedging instruments.

Weekly Inflation Research update

Research Inflation Markets Guide

Inflation Big Picture Study

Please go to gm.db.com/inflation for more information.

9.1 Further Reading

Further Reading

Examining dynamic asset allocation

strategies for high inflation scenarios and

the effect of financial market changes on

inflation hedging instruments

INFLATION HEDGING FOR

INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS

PU

BL

ISH

ED

BY

ALSO SPONSORED BY

MEDIA PARTNERS

JUNE | 2011

CLEAR PATH ANALYSIS IN PARTNERSHIP WITH

Global

7 October 2011

DB Inflation Report

Weekly Inflation Update

Deutsche Bank AG/London

All prices are those current at the end of the previous trading session unless otherwise indicated. Prices are sourced from local exchanges via Reuters, Bloomberg and other vendors. Data is sourced from Deutsche Bank and subject companies. Deutsche Bank does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. Thus, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. DISCLOSURES AND ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS ARE LOCATED IN APPENDIX 1. MICA(P) 146/04/2011.

Strategy Update

Change in breakevens, US & UK

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2y 5y 10y 30y 2y 5y 10y 30y

1W change in BEI

carry adjusted

GBP USD

Change in breakevens, EUR & FRF

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

2y 5y 10y 30y 2y 5y 10y 20y

1W change in BEI

carry adjusted

EUR FRF

ILB rich/cheap vs nominals

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2012 2017 2023 2028 2034 2039 2045

GBP DEM

USD FRF

ITL

Rich (-) / cheap (+) vs nominal curve

Source: Deutsche Bank

Upcoming data

Mkt Indicator Date, GMT

FRF CPI Sep 12 Oct, 05:30

DEM CPI Sep 13 Oct, 06:00

EUR HICP Sep 14 Oct, 09:00

Research Team

Markus Heider (+44) 20 754-52167 [email protected]

Alex Li (1) 212 250-5483 [email protected]

Vanshree Verma (+44) 20 754-77583 [email protected]

Mac

ro

Glo

bal

Mar

kets

Res

earc

h

Economics: This week’s PPI data point to further upward pressure on UK and euro area consumer core inflation in the coming months. Business survey price balances have continued to fall in September however, which is consistent with the view that CPI inflation will slow in 2012.

Global: 10y EUR real rates look too high relative to USD against the recent data divergence. We prefer long-end TIPS and UKTi B/Es over OATei.

EUR: The ongoing deterioration in economic data remains challenging for B/Es. In RV, we prefer the 10y sector and the DBRei-20 in particular.

GBP: While real yield valuations are challenging, the scheduled new 50y linker issue should look attractive relative to nominal gilts (in B/E and ASW), RPI swaps and B/Es in other markets.

USD: Forward TIPS B/Es have diverged from survey-based measures of inflation expectations, although declines may be exaggerated by liquidity factors.

AUD: In our view, the market is underpricing inflation risk over the short term, with the gap between RBA inflation expectations and breakevens extremely wide. Our preferred trade is long the belly in 2y/5y/10y ZCS B/E butterfly.

Asia: Inflation in Thailand & South Korea fell more than expected in September, supporting our expectations of no policy rate change at the next CB meeting.

Inflation Markets Bond Yld BEI 1M fwd ASW ASW

discnt ZC Rate Sprd

ZC-BEICPI/RPI

fcst

US CPI

TII Apr-16 -0.65 1.53 1.51 -18 14 5y 1.87 34 spot 3.8

TII Jan-21 0.05 1.83 1.82 13 31 10y 2.30 48 Dec-11 2.9

TII Feb-41 0.90 2.02 2.02 76 54 30y 2.54 52 Jun-12 1.7

EA HICPxt

DBRei 16 -0.22 1.24 1.16 -65 20 5y 1.69 45 spot 2.5

DBRei 20 0.31 1.40 1.36 -48 26 10y 1.84 44 Dec-11 2.7

OATei 40 1.44 2.07 2.06 109 39 30y 2.11 4 Jun-12 1.8

FR CPIxt

BTANi-16 0.23 1.52 1.47 21 39 5y 1.88 36 spot 2.2

OATi-19 0.68 1.68 1.65 37 35 10y 2.07 39 Dec-11 2.1

OATi-29 1.29 2.10 2.09 98 37 20y 2.18 7 Jun-12 1.5

UK RPI

UKTi-16 -1.52 2.86 2.76 -31 15 5y 3.11 26 spot 5.2

UKTi-22 -0.37 2.80 2.76 9 32 10y 3.21 41 Dec-11 5.0

UKTi-40 0.18 3.15 3.14 44 33 30y 3.50 35 Jun-12 3.7Source: Deutsche Bank

Global

1 March 2011

Global Macro Issues Issues in Inflation

Deutsche Bank AG/London

All prices are those current at the end of the previous trading session unless otherwise indicated. Prices are sourced from local exchanges via Reuters, Bloomberg and other vendors. Data is sourced from Deutsche Bank and subject companies. Deutsche Bank does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. Thus, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. DISCLOSURES AND ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS ARE LOCATED IN APPENDIX 1. MICA(P) 007/05/2010

Economics

Research Team

Markus Heider (+44) 20 754-52167 [email protected]

Mac

ro

Glo

bal

Mar

kets

Res

earc

h

Eco

no

mic

s

Abstract

The uncertainty about the longer-term inflation outlook has risen substantially since the onset of the financial crisis in 2008. After 15 years or more of low and stable inflation, professional forecasters, investors and indeed central banks themselves now consider below and above target outcomes as possible, even probable. The non-standard reaction of economic policy during the crisis, the discussion about potential changes to monetary policy objectives, the run-up in public debt, but also apparent changes to the inflation process itself during the Great Moderation as well as the open inflation implications of structural trends like globalisation all have contributed to the rise in uncertainty. In this note we look at some of the main issues surrounding the inflation outlook and conclude that inflation risks for the coming years seem to be skewed to the upside of central bank targets.

March 2011

Global Inflation Markets

A guideMarkus [email protected]

All prices are those current at the end of the previous trading session unless otherwise indicated. Prices are sourced from local exchanges i R t Bl b d th d D t i d f D t h B k d bj t i D t h B k d d kvia Reuters, Bloomberg and other vendors. Data is sourced from Deutsche Bank and subject companies. Deutsche Bank does and seeks

to do business with companies covered in its research reports. Thus, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. DISCLOSURES AND ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS ARE LOCATED IN APPENDIX 1. MICA(P) 007/05/2010

10Contacts


Sales

Haroon Sana [email protected] +44 20 754 73671

Matthew Yencken [email protected] +31 2 8258 2010

Michael Durr [email protected] +44 20 754 73671

David Martins-da-Silva [email protected] +44 20 754 74159

Matthew Blackwell [email protected] +65 68 83 16 20

Ed Rubin [email protected] +1 212 250 0551

Tai-Zhong Jiang (Tai-Chu) [email protected] +81 3 5156 6186

Structuring

Daragh McDevitt [email protected] +44 20 754 52750

Xavier Avila [email protected] +44 20 754 72731

Michael Parker [email protected] +65 68 83 08 88

Josh Heller [email protected] +61 2 8258 3619

Research

Markus Heider [email protected] +44 20 754 2167

Alex Li [email protected] +1 212 250 5483

Trading

Stephane Salas [email protected] +44 20 754 78809

Nicolas Tabardel [email protected] +44 20 754 55748

Allan Levin [email protected] +1 212 250 7105

Katsuya Miyoshi [email protected] +81 3 5156 6205

Vaughan Harvey [email protected] +61 2 8258 1848

Integrated trading, structuring and research Unlike some of our competitors, Deutsche Bank’s inflation trading, structuring and research professionals work closely together, combining strategic and technical expertise with the macro-economic insights so important with this offering.

10.1 Contacts

Contacts – Deutsche Bank Global Inflation Team

This document is intended for discussion purposes only and does not create any legally binding obligations on the part of Deutsche Bank AG and/or its affiliates (“DB”). Without limitation, this document does not constitute an offer, an invitation to offer or a recommendation to enter into any transaction. When making an investment decision, you should rely solely on the final documentation relating to the transaction and not the summary contained herein. DB is not acting as your financial adviser or in any other fiduciary capacity with respect to this proposed transaction. The transaction(s) or products(s) mentioned herein may not be appropriate for all investors and before entering into any transaction you should take steps to ensure that you fully understand the transaction and have made an independent assessment of the appropriateness of the transaction in the light of your own objectives and circumstances, including the possible risks and benefits of entering into such transaction. For general information regarding the nature and risks of the proposed transaction and types of financial instruments please go to http://www.globalmarkets.db.com/riskdisclosures www.globalmarkets.db.com/riskdisclosures. You should also consider seeking advice from your own advisers in making this assessment. If you decide to enter into a transaction with DB, you do so in reliance on your own judgment. The information contained in this document is based on material we believe to be reliable; however, we do not represent that it is accurate, current, complete, or error free. Assumptions, estimates and opinions contained in this document constitute our judgment as of the date of the document and are subject to change without notice. Any projections are based on a number of assumptions as to market conditions and there can be no guarantee that any projected results will be achieved. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. This material was prepared by a Sales or Trading function within DB, and was not produced, reviewed or edited by the Research Department. Any opinions expressed herein may differ from the opinions expressed by other DB departments including the Research Department. Sales and Trading functions are subject to additional potential conflicts of interest which the Research Department does not face. DB may engage in transactions in a manner inconsistent with the views discussed herein. DB trades or may trade as principal in the instruments (or related derivatives), and may have proprietary positions in the instruments (or related derivatives) discussed herein. DB may make a market in the instruments (or related derivatives) discussed herein. Sales and Trading personnel are compensated in part based on the volume of transactions effected by them. The distribution of this document and availability of these products and services in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law. You may not distribute this document, in whole or in part, without our express written permission. DB SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHER LOSSES OR DAMAGES INCLUDING LOSS OF PROFITS INCURRED BY YOU OR ANY THIRD PARTY THAT MAY ARISE FROM ANY RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT OR FOR THE RELIABILITY, ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS OR TIMELINESS THEREOF. DB is authorised under German Banking Law (competent authority: BaFin - Federal Financial Supervising Authority) and regulated by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of UK business. This document is intended for discussion purposes only. You may not distribute this document, in whole or in part, without express written permission. Without limitation, this document does not constitute an offer, an invitation to offer or a recommendation to enter into any transaction. The information contained in this document is based on material we believe to be reliable; however, we do not represent that it is accurate, current, complete, or error free. Assumptions, estimates and opinions contained in this document constitute our judgment as of the date of the document and are subject to change without notice. Any projections are based on a number of assumptions as to market conditions and there can be no guarantee that any projected results will be achieved. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. The services described in this document are provided by Deutsche Bank AG or by its subsidiaries and/or affiliates in accordance with appropriate local legislation and regulation. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., a subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG, conducts investment banking and securities activities in the United States. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. is a member of NYSE, FINRA and SIPC. Investments are subject to investment risk, including market fluctuations, regulatory change, counterparty risk, possible delays in repayment and loss of income and principal invested. The value of investment can fall as well as rise and you might not get back the amount originally invested at any point in time. © Copyright Deutsche Bank AG 2012

inflation hedging it & trading it - company – deutsche...

Documents