influence of different information sources to innovation performance: evidence from france,...

5
INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT INFORMATION SOURCES TO INNOVATION PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM FRANCE, NETHERLANDS AND CROATIA Coordination : Roxane Silberman CNRS/Réseau Quetelet Presented by Mirjana Pejic-Bach /Faculty of Economics & Business – Zagreb, University of Zagreb Location, Event, Date

Upload: julia-gray

Post on 13-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT INFORMATION SOURCES TO INNOVATION PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM FRANCE, NETHERLANDS AND CROATIA Coordination : Roxane Silberman CNRS/Réseau

INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT INFORMATION SOURCES TO INNOVATION PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM FRANCE,

NETHERLANDS AND CROATIA

Coordination : Roxane SilbermanCNRS/Réseau Quetelet

Presented by Mirjana Pejic-Bach /Faculty of Economics & Business – Zagreb, University of Zagreb

Location, Event, Date

Page 2: INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT INFORMATION SOURCES TO INNOVATION PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM FRANCE, NETHERLANDS AND CROATIA Coordination : Roxane Silberman CNRS/Réseau

Specific Research• Research question: Are there any differences between Croatia, France and

Netherlands regarding the impact of information sources for innovation activities to R&D activities of the firm?

• Dependent variables: R&D internal and R&D external (binary variables)• Explanatory variables: Firm, Suppliers, Customers, Competitors, Consultants,

Universities, Government, Conferences, trade fairs and exhibitions as sources for innovation activities (binary variables)

• Control variables: Size, Group, Size of the market, Funding for innovation and Industry (numeric and binary variables)

• Method: We specified logistic distributions and maximized the log-likelihood of the logit models (Greene, 2003) to estimate models’ parameters up to a positive constant.

• Results: Overall, we may conclude that choices for innovation sources have varying effect on R&D performance from one country to another.

Page 3: INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT INFORMATION SOURCES TO INNOVATION PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM FRANCE, NETHERLANDS AND CROATIA Coordination : Roxane Silberman CNRS/Réseau

Data Used• The data are derived from cross-sectional survey called ‘Community Innovation

Survey’ (CIS8) which covers the period from 2006 to 2008 and is based on the Oslo Manual drawn up by the OECD.

• The Community Innovation Survey is the result of a significant increase in the importance given to innovation issues at the EU level.

• We use CIS8 from three countries, France, Netherlands and Croatia.

Country Source Sample

Croatia Central Bureau of Statistics 3,333

France Ministry of Economics, Finances and Industry

19,901

Netherlands Statistics Netherlands 10,612

Page 4: INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT INFORMATION SOURCES TO INNOVATION PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM FRANCE, NETHERLANDS AND CROATIA Coordination : Roxane Silberman CNRS/Réseau

Obstacles and Suppport

Institution related obstacles

Research-related obstacles

Data-related obstacles

Situational obstacles

• Researcher’s institution• Data providing

institution

• Model• Software

• META data• Country differences

• Time constraints• Financial constraints

𝑆𝑢𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠= 𝑓 (𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 ,𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ,𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡)

Support

• Institutional• Administrative

procedure• Researcher’s

institution• Data providing

institution• Project funding

Page 5: INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT INFORMATION SOURCES TO INNOVATION PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM FRANCE, NETHERLANDS AND CROATIA Coordination : Roxane Silberman CNRS/Réseau

Thanks for Listening

Contact: [email protected]

[email protected]

Website: http://www.dwbproject.org/