influencing lead clinicians dr david i gozzard associate medical director mersey internal audit...
TRANSCRIPT
INFLUENCINGLEAD CLINICIANS
Dr David I GozzardAssociate Medical Director
Mersey Internal Audit Agency
Outline
1. Introduction
2. Importance of building the case for improvement
3. A strategy for clinical engagement
4. Building clinical improvement teams
Introduction
“Quality has been used as a weapon in the fight against limits to healthcare funding. In one corner of the ring stands the clinician, outraged that a paper pushing manager concerned with throughputs and efficiency does not understand or care that quality of care is adversely affected by cost cutting. In the other corner stands the manager, convinced that quality is the last refuge of the medical scoundrel – a convenient, vague and all embracing term used to block any attempts to question or change clinical behaviour”
Buchan 1998In Davies H. et al. Healthcare professionals’ views on clinician engagement in
quality improvement. A literature review. The Health Foundation, 2007
The Problem?
The Paradigm
• Clinicians’ primary professional focus is their own practice.
• At best, clinicians have little time to spare for quality agendas of their
organisations.
• At worst, relationships are strained because the clinicians’ quality
agendas conflict with those of their organisations.
• Very little happens without a clinician order
Importance of Building the Case for Improvement
STANDARDS
COMPLIANCE
(or PERFORMANCE)
IMPROVEMENT
WHAT IS CLINICAL AUDIT?
“Clinical audit is a quality
improvement cycle that involves
measurement of the effectiveness
of healthcare against agreed and
proven standards for high quality,
and taking action to bring practice
in line with these standards so as
to improve the quality of care and
health outcomes.”
New Principles of Best Practice in Clinical Audit, Jan 2011
Clinical Audit is a continuous cycle of:1.Deciding on topics2.Measuring delivered care against standards3.Acting on the findings4.Sustaining improvements – re-audit
HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS
Every system is perfectly designed to achieve exactly the results it
gets
The “Process” of Healthcare
The Patient133 People to take careof the patient
Avedis Donabedian (1919 – 2000)
AUDIT AND IMPROVEMENT
Prototype PilotAdapt and
Spread
Improvement project
AuditAudit
Audit as Initiator and Scrutiny
A Strategy for Clinical Engagement
Engaging Doctors in
Quality and Safety
1. Discover Common Purpose:
2. Reframe Values and Beliefs:
3. Segment the Engagement Plan:
4. Use “Engaging” Improvement Methods
5. Show Courage:
6. Adopt an Engaging Style:
• Improve Patient Outcomes• Reduce hassles and wasted time• Understand the organisations culture• Understand the opportunities and barriers
• Make Physicians partners not customers
• Promote both system and individual responsibility for quality
• Use the 80/20 rule• Identify and activate champions• Educate and inform leaders• Develop project management
skills• Identify and work with “laggards”
• Standardise what is standardisable and no more• Generate light, not heat, with data• Make the right thing easy to try and easy to do
• Provide backup all the way to the board
• Involve doctors from the beginning• Make physician involvement visible• Work with the real leaders• Work with early adopters
• Build trust within each quality initiative
• Communicate candidly and often
• Value physicians time with your time
© 2007 Institute for Healthcare Improvement
The Doctors’ Quality Agenda
Physician-led, evidence-based, data-drivenBetter outcomes
When all was said and done, how did my patient do?Professional reputationPersonal sense of excellence
Less wasted timeHasslesBottlenecks and delaysReworkMy day was going well until…
Personal “Muda”
Documenting careWaiting for delays and backups in patient flowLocating patient records and referral lettersServing on committeesCertifying the medical necessity for equipment and ambulancesManaging patients’ pharmaceutical needs with repeat prescriptionsInteracting with social services
Engaging Doctors in
Quality and Safety
1. Discover Common Purpose:
2. Reframe Values and Beliefs:
3. Segment the Engagement Plan:
4. Use “Engaging” Improvement Methods
5. Show Courage:
6. Adopt an Engaging Style:
• Improve Patient Outcomes• Reduce hassles and wasted time• Understand the organisations culture• Understand the opportunities and barriers
• Make Physicians partners not customers
• Promote both system and individual responsibility for quality
• Use the 80/20 rule• Identify and activate champions• Educate and inform leaders• Develop project management
skills• Identify and work with “laggards”
• Standardise what is standardisable and no more• Generate light, not heat, with data• Make the right thing easy to try and easy to do
• Provide backup all the way to the board
• Involve doctors from the beginning• Make physician involvement visible• Work with the real leaders• Work with early adopters
• Build trust within each quality initiative
• Communicate candidly and often
• Value physicians time with your time
© 2007 Institute for Healthcare Improvement
Common Agenda: Keys to Success
Frame the quality challenge in terms that are important to doctors
“Reduce Needless Deaths, Readmissions, Nosocomial Infections, Hassles…”
Not “Reduce LOS” or “Improve Productivity”Measure and display the results on important things—show them that together, you’re actually making these things better
Reframing Managers’ Values, Habits, Beliefs…
• Doctors are important customers
• Doctors make care decisions, we run the finances and facilities
• The patient is the only customer
• Doctors are our partners in running the system
FROM TO
Reframing Doctors’ Values, Habits, Beliefs…
• I must have complete autonomy for everything
• I am personally responsible for the patients I take care of directly
• I need autonomy for the art of medicine, but I share it with other physicians for the science of medicine
• I am responsible for the care given broadly throughout the system that I am part of, including my own patients
FROM TO
Engaging Doctors in
Quality and Safety
1. Discover Common Purpose:
2. Reframe Values and Beliefs:
3. Segment the Engagement Plan:
4. Use “Engaging” Improvement Methods
5. Show Courage:
6. Adopt an Engaging Style:
• Improve Patient Outcomes• Reduce hassles and wasted time• Understand the organisations culture• Understand the opportunities and barriers
• Make Physicians partners not customers
• Promote both system and individual responsibility for quality
• Use the 80/20 rule• Identify and activate champions• Educate and inform leaders• Develop project management
skills• Identify and work with “laggards”
• Standardise what is standardisable and no more• Generate light, not heat, with data• Make the right thing easy to try and easy to do
• Provide backup all the way to the board
• Involve doctors from the beginning• Make physician involvement visible• Work with the real leaders• Work with early adopters
• Build trust within each quality initiative
• Communicate candidly and often
• Value physicians time with your time
© 2007 Institute for Healthcare Improvement
“There is no such thing as improvement in general”
Joseph Juran
“There is no such thing as clinical engagement in general”
Harvard Faculty
Questions
• Which doctors must be engaged in this initiative, if it is to succeed? (And which doctors are not relevant at all?)
• Who is on our short list of potential champions for this initiative? How will we select one or two champions? What is our plan to support them?
• What will be the role of the formal leaders: Clinical Executive Management, Department Heads, and Clinical Directors in this initiative?
• Does a doctor need to be the “project leader” for this initiative? If so, how will we train and support that doctor so that the project will be effectively led?
• Which doctors are likely to vocally oppose and potentially derail this initiative? How could we mitigate that risk?
Table Exercise
Consider a quality initiative that you are either engaged in or
are planning to start.
Some doctors are likely to vocally oppose and potentially derail
this initiative.
How could we mitigate that risk?
List 3 approaches
10 minutes
Leadership
Engagement
Participation
Develop ability
Cultivate Willingness
Segmenting and developing Clinicians to achieve
improvement
Speciality & Improvement areas
Control
Benefit
Relief
Support
Focus
Skill
Professionally and clinically competent
Clinicians
ClinicalProfessional
Engaging Doctors in
Quality and Safety
1. Discover Common Purpose:
2. Reframe Values and Beliefs:
3. Segment the Engagement Plan:
4. Use “Engaging” Improvement Methods
5. Show Courage:
6. Adopt an Engaging Style:
• Improve Patient Outcomes• Reduce hassles and wasted time• Understand the organisations culture• Understand the opportunities and barriers
• Make Physicians partners not customers
• Promote both system and individual responsibility for quality
• Use the 80/20 rule• Identify and activate champions• Educate and inform leaders• Develop project management
skills• Identify and work with “laggards”
• Standardise what is standardisable and no more• Generate light, not heat, with data• Make the right thing easy to try and easy to do
• Provide backup all the way to the board
• Involve doctors from the beginning• Make physician involvement visible• Work with the real leaders• Work with early adopters
• Build trust within each quality initiative
• Communicate candidly and often
• Value physicians time with your time
© 2007 Institute for Healthcare Improvement
Standardization: Improving Your Performance “Standard of Care”
Dr.
A
Dr.
E
Dr.
D
Dr.
C
Dr.
B
ProtocolProcedure
ProtocolProcedureProtocol
Procedure
ProtocolProcedure Protocol
Procedure
ProtocolProcedureProtocol
Procedure
ProtocolProcedureProtocol
Procedure
ProtocolProcedure
Reliability =60-90% or less
Ability to identify defects, learn, improve --LOW
Dr.
A
Dr.
E
Dr.
D
Dr.
C
Dr.
B
Reliability =99% or more
Ability to identify defects, learn, improve --HIGH
ProtocolProcedure
ProtocolProcedure
“Standard of Care”
Typical Approach to Standardizing Clinical Processes
Source: Reinertsen JL, Bisognano M, Pugh MD. Seven Leadership Leverage Points for Organization-Level Improvement in Health Care (Second Edition). IHI Innovation Series white paper. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2008. (Available on www.IHI.org)
Design Design Design Design Approve
Conference Rooms
Real World
Implement
A Better Way to Standardize Clinical Processes
Design
Test and Modify
Test and Modify
Implement
Approve (if necessary)
Test and Modify
Conference Rooms
Real World
Source: Reinertsen JL, Bisognano M, Pugh MD. Seven Leadership Leverage Points for Organization-Level Improvement in Health Care(Second Edition). IHI Innovation Series white paper. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2008. (Available on www.IHI.org)
Refine the Design for the Local Setting Using Small Tests of Change
Questions
Are you trying to standardize too much?
Do your data reports to doctors make things worse?
Do you have endless meetings trying to decide on the “right
answer,” as if this is the one and only opportunity you’ll ever
have to get it right?
Have you ever faced a doctor rebellion after implementing the
“right answer?”
Engaging Doctors in
Quality and Safety
1. Discover Common Purpose:
2. Reframe Values and Beliefs:
3. Segment the Engagement Plan:
4. Use “Engaging” Improvement Methods
5. Show Courage:
6. Adopt an Engaging Style:
• Improve Patient Outcomes• Reduce hassles and wasted time• Understand the organisations culture• Understand the opportunities and barriers
• Make Physicians partners not customers
• Promote both system and individual responsibility for quality
• Use the 80/20 rule• Identify and activate champions• Educate and inform leaders• Develop project management
skills• Identify and work with “laggards”
• Standardise what is standardisable and no more• Generate light, not heat, with data• Make the right thing easy to try and easy to do
• Provide backup all the way to the board
• Involve doctors from the beginning• Make physician involvement visible• Work with the real leaders• Work with early adopters
• Build trust within each quality initiative
• Communicate candidly and often
• Value physicians time with your time
© 2007 Institute for Healthcare Improvement
What do you do?
A complaint comes to you from a nurse that a surgical
consultant behaves badly in theatre, shouting at staff and
occasionally throwing surgical instruments. The staff
have been scared to raise this issue but the nurse now
says that several nurses will resign unless “something is
done”. The doctor involved is head of a regional surgical
service.
Engaging Doctors in
Quality and Safety
1. Discover Common Purpose:
2. Reframe Values and Beliefs:
3. Segment the Engagement Plan:
4. Use “Engaging” Improvement Methods
5. Show Courage:
6. Adopt an Engaging Style:
• Improve Patient Outcomes• Reduce hassles and wasted time• Understand the organisations culture• Understand the opportunities and barriers
• Make Physicians partners not customers
• Promote both system and individual responsibility for quality
• Use the 80/20 rule• Identify and activate champions• Educate and inform leaders• Develop project management
skills• Identify and work with “laggards”
• Standardise what is standardisable and no more• Generate light, not heat, with data• Make the right thing easy to try and easy to do
• Provide backup all the way to the board
• Involve doctors from the beginning• Make physician involvement visible• Work with the real leaders• Work with early adopters
• Build trust within each quality initiative
• Communicate candidly and often
• Value physicians time with your time
© 2007 Institute for Healthcare Improvement
Adopt an Engaging Style
Involve doctors from the beginning (but don’t make them do everything)
Work with the real leaders (they may not be most senior)
Work with early adopters (they will help you and the improvement)
Make doctors involvement visible (credible and not shameful)
Build trust within each quality initiative (make it part of the way things are done around here)
Communicate candidly, often (if your lips aren't bleeding you haven't communicated enough)
Value doctors time with your time (don’t waste either!)
Doctors…
• See the world one patient at a time
• Have strong, specific, largely unspoken bonds based
on shared experiences
• Overestimate the risk of change
• Behave collegially about knowledge, autonomously
about individual patients
• Are influenced by credible data
• Value “due process”
How would you use the diffusion of innovation theory
to influence?
No need!
Mention it!
Show a working
example! Prove it!
Change the rules!
Principles for Working with DoctorsInvolve them at the beginning
Identify and work with the real leadersearly adopters
Display doctor involvement to all
Display credible results to all
Don’t “package” the data
Show that you value their process and their time
Building Clinical Improvement Teams
Do we have the skills?
Clinical AuditRoot cause
analysisQuality
improvement
•5 whys
•Fishbone diagrams
•Process mapping •Clinical consensus
•Leadership
•Enthusiasm
•Motivation
•Evidence base for assuring commissioners and/or patients
•Money
•Resource•Identifying issues
•Prioritisation
•Setting standards
•Data collection
•Analysis
•Action plans
QI Expertise
Buy or Build?
Two Aspects of QI
1. Knowledge
2. Application(based upon experience)
References
1. Davies H. et al. Healthcare professionals’ views on clinician
engagement in quality improvement. A literature review. The Health
Foundation, 2007
2. Clinical Audit: A Simple Guide. http://
www.hqip.org.uk/assets/Guidance/HQIP-Clinical-Audit-Simple-Guide-o
nline1.pdf
3. Reinertsen JL, Bisognano M, Pugh MD. Seven Leadership Leverage
Points for Organization-Level Improvement in Health Care (Second
Edition). IHI Innovation Series white paper. Cambridge, MA: Institute
for Healthcare Improvement; 2008. (Available on www.IHI.org)
References
4. Reinertsen JL, Gosfield AG, Rupp W, Whittington JW. Engaging
Physicians in a Shared Quality Agenda. IHI Innovation Series white
paper. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2007.
(Available on www.IHI.org)