information regarding agility grms mod contract for removals · service — pre-move surveys —...
TRANSCRIPT
*If
Ministry of Defence
Defence Equipment and Support Secretariat Building C16, C Site Ministry of Defence Ploughley Road Lower Arncott Bicester OX25 2LD
Email: DES SEC-PolSec LE-JSC-WPNS©mod.gov.uk
dens
Our Reference: F012019/13097 Date: 19 December 2019
Dear
Thank you for your email of 22 November 2019 requesting the following information:
"I have been given this email address in the hope that you are able to deal with a Freedom on Information (FOI) request I have submitted which refers to the Agility GRMS MOD Contract for removals.
I have been advised that since FOI gives rights to access information held by Public Sector organisations, and that Leidos is not public sector, that my FOI request would need to flow through DE&S to the DE&S Contract Management Organisation who would then request the information from Leidos. Hence I have been provided your details through my contact at DE&S. The email chain below will provide you with a little context However, to summarise my reason for the FOI request I offer you the following headlines:
• I have made a complaint to Agility GRMS regarding the removal service I was provided by Britannia, in which they have admitted to breaching the MOD Contract.
• Whilst I understand the contract is commercially sensitive in parts, I am content for the financial aspects of the contract to be redacted as this does not concern me, however, - what I do consider relates to my case is the specific metrics surrounding the standard of service that is to be delivered by Agility and their sub-contractors. Whilst I fully appreciate that Britannia have admitted they did not deliver to the MOD contract in my case, the information I have requested will provide me with the context of the extent they breached the contract, as this detail does not exist within JSP 800. Considering my complaint relates to the lack of accountability to sub-contractors and later the lack of transparency I have been subjected to date, I feel that release of this information is entirely appropriate in order to resolve my desired outcome. I am also keen to understand the contractual restrictions placed on the sub-contractor to effectively deal with complaints in terms of compensation, etc.
• I am meeting with senior representatives from Agility GRMS and Britannia, on 10 December, as part of the complaints process and I wish to have the MOD Contract for this meeting. I have been requesting sight of the MOD Contract since 16 September, initially through Agility GRMS and then to Leidos with no avail (details in the email below)."
Defence Equipment & Support
I am treating your correspondence as a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA).
A search for the information has now been completed within the Ministry of Defence, and I can confirm that some information in scope of your request is held.
The information you have requested can be found below and in the attachment.
The Ministry of Defence (the Authority) doesn't hold a copy of the Leidos contract with Agility that you have requested. However, Leidos Europe Limited hold Agility to the same standard of service as that between the Authority and Leidos Europe Limited. The attached document shows the standard of service contained with the MOD's contract with Leidos.
In terms of what is specified in Agility's contract to its suppliers regarding storage and packaging, the following requirement is specified (this information is held by the Authority, although it is not known if it is applicable to Britannia, as their sub-contractor):
6.3.0 Storage Facility
6.3.1. Storage must be placed in a dry, secure and climate controlled facility that is well maintained and free from rodents and other pests
6.3.2. The facilities security must be monitored 24 hours a day and secured from unauthorised access
6.3.3. The facility must have suitable fire precautions in place (i.e. No Smoking) and there should be ample firefighting equipment and it must be equipped with a fire alarm system that is regularly tested
6.3.4. Any change of the physical storage facility must be approved by AGILITY GRMS in writing
6.4.0. Packing Specification
6.4.1. Long term storage shipments must be fully export packed, unless alternative arrangements are approved by AGILITY GRMS in writing. AGILITY GRMS origin SOW terms apply.
6.4.2. Storage containers/vaults are required to be loaded directly at the client's residence.
7
6.4.3. All storage containers are to be sealed with the serial number of the seal annotated on the container packing list. If (with authority and presence of AU and inspectors) a shipment is opened, the new seal numbers are to be noted on the inventory as NEW. The old seals are to be placed inside the container and the numbers although noted as old on the inventory should be visible.
6.4.4. Packed by owner goods must not be accepted for storage.
The MOD doesn't hold information in respect of the contractual restrictions placed on the sub-contractor to effectively deal with complaints in terms of compensation, etc. Under Section 21
.(Information reasonably Accessible to Applicant) I can inform you that the MOD contract with Leidos Europe is available on Contract Finder. It is called the Logistics, Commodities and Services (Transformation) Deliver Partner Contract, and is available at this link: https://~n.t.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/65a88912-63bf-46e1-8896-5e16dae1c5fe?p=©QxUIRRPTO=NONT08=UF. The contract itself is found in the documents at the bottom of the page.
Defence Equipment & Support
If you have any queries regarding the content of this letter, please contact this office in the first instance.
If you wish to complain about the handling of your request, or the content of this response, you can request an independent internal review by contacting the Information Rights Compliance team, Ground Floor, MOD Main Building, Whitehall, SW1A 2HB (e-mail [email protected]). Please note that any request for an internal review should be made within 40 working days of the date of this response.
If you remain dissatisfied following an internal review, you may raise your complaint directly to the Information Commissioner under the provisions of Section 50 of the Freedom of Information Act. Please note that the Information Commissioner will not normally investigate your case until the MOD internal review process has been completed. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at: Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 5AF. Further details of the role and powers of the Information Commissioner can be found on the Commissioners website at https://ico.org.uk/.
Yours sincerely
Defence Equipment and Support
Defence Equipment & Support
Res
pons
e
The
spec
ific
met
rics
surr
ound
ing
the
stan
dard
of s
ervi
ce th
at is
to b
e de
liver
ed b
y A
gilit
y an
d th
eir s
ub-c
ontra
ctor
s.
Leid
os E
urop
e Li
mite
d ho
ld A
gilit
y to
the
sam
e st
anda
rd o
f ser
vice
as
that
bet
wee
n th
e A
utho
rity
and
Leid
os E
urop
e Li
mite
d. T
his
is b
elow
:
SOR
Li
ne
Item
nu
mbe
rW
eigh
ti
SOR
Lin
e Ite
m re
quire
men
t S
ervi
c e
Per
for
man
ce
Stan
da
rd
Ser
vic
e P
erfo
r m
ance
C
ateg
or
y
Ser
vice
P
erfo
rm
ante
ng
Ser
vice
P
erfo
rma
nce
Failu
re
Poi
nts
Rep
eat
Ser
vice
P
erfo
rman
ce
Fai
lure
P
erio
d
Ser
vice
P
erfo
rman
ce
Sta
ndar
d M
easu
re
Ser
vice
P
erfo
rman
ce
Sub
-C
ateg
ory
3.3.
1 (i)
Prov
ide
as a
n on
Req
uest
ser
vice
all m
ovem
ents
of p
erso
nal
belo
ngin
gs in
the
UK
or o
vers
eas
for E
ntitl
ed P
erso
nnel
and
de
pend
ents
with
in p
erso
nal s
cale
s an
d En
title
men
ts in
acc
orda
nce
with
th
e re
quire
men
t in
the
Req
uest
from
the
Auth
oris
ed D
eman
der,
incl
udin
g:
— pr
ovis
ion
of a
dvic
e an
d su
ppor
t for
Ent
itled
Per
sonn
el a
nd
depe
nden
ts in
the
orga
nisa
tion,
man
agem
ent a
nd m
ovem
ent o
f pe
rson
al b
elon
ging
s th
roug
hout
the
proc
ess
— bo
okin
g se
rvic
e —
pre-
mov
e su
rvey
s —
furn
iture
mov
emen
t ser
vice
—
a fu
ll con
tract
or p
ack
and
unpa
ck s
ervi
ce to
, fro
m o
r bet
wee
n co
untri
es n
ot s
peci
fied
in th
e fu
rnitu
re m
ovem
ent s
ervi
ce
— a
self
pack
rem
oval
s se
rvic
e , i
nclu
ding
pro
visi
on o
f pac
king
mat
eria
ls
— Bu
lk M
oves
—
stor
age
of fu
rnis
hing
s and
per
sona
l effe
cts
The
DP
shal
l ens
ure
that
pac
king
is c
ompl
iant
with
the
Cod
es a
nd
Stan
dard
s, o
r suc
h hi
gher
sta
ndar
ds a
re m
ay b
e re
quire
d fo
r cer
tain
ite
ms
and
/ or m
odes
of t
rans
port.
100.
00
°A
PC2
Med
ium
2.
0 24
hrs
Serv
ice
Perfo
rman
ce
Failu
re P
oint
s w
ill ac
crue
for
each
Ser
vice
Pe
rform
ance
Fa
ilure
and
R
epea
t Ser
vice
Pe
rform
ance
Fa
ilure
aga
inst
th
is S
OR
Lin
e Ite
m
Req
uire
men
t in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith
para
grap
h 5
of
Sche
dule
10
(PAY
MEN
T,
PER
FOR
MAN
C
E &
IN
CEN
TIVI
SATI
Even
t
The
DP
shal
l ens
ure
that
pac
king
is c
ompl
iant
with
the
Cod
es a
nd
Stan
dard
s, o
r suc
h hi
gher
stan
dard
s ar
e m
ay b
e re
quire
d fo
r cer
tain
ite
ms
and
/ or m
odes
of t
rans
port.
ON
M
ECH
ANIS
M)
33.1
(ii)
The
DP
shal
l ens
ure
ship
men
ts a
rrive
und
amag
ed (e
xclu
ding
item
s pa
cked
by
owne
r).
90.0
0%
PC2
Med
ium
2.
0 24
hrs
Whe
re th
e to
tal
num
ber o
f sh
ipm
ents
in th
e re
leva
nt
Con
tract
Mon
th
less
the
sum
of
the
Serv
ice
Perfo
rman
ce
Failu
re T
ally
s fo
r th
is S
OR
Lin
e ite
m in
the
rele
vant
C
ontra
ct M
onth
Even
t
3.3.
1 Th
e D
P sh
all e
nsur
e a
cust
omer
sat
isfa
ctio
n ra
te o
f 90%
or a
bove
, to
be m
onito
red
by c
usto
mer
feed
back
pro
vide
d vi
a th
e on
line
post
mov
e qu
ality
sur
vey (
Nil r
espo
nse
to s
urve
y is
mea
sure
d at
100
%
satis
fact
ion.
)
divi
ded
by th
e to
tal n
umbe
r of
ship
men
ts in
the
rele
vant
C
ontra
ct M
onth
(e
xpre
ssed
as
a pe
rcen
tage
), is
le
ss th
an th
e Se
rvic
e Pe
rform
ance
St
anda
rd
spec
ified
in
colu
mn
C,
Serv
ice
Perfo
rman
ce
Failu
re P
oint
s de
term
ined
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith
colu
mn
F w
ill ac
crue
.
Serv
ice
Perfo
rman
ce
Failu
re P
oint
s w
ill ac
crue
for
each
Ser
vice
10
0.00
PC
2 M
ediu
m
2.0
24 h
rs
Perfo
rman
ce
Failu
re a
nd
Rep
eat S
ervi
ce
Perfo
rman
ce
Failu
re a
gain
st
this
SO
R L
ine
Item
Even
t
Req
uire
men
t in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith
para
grap
h 5
of
Sche
dule
10
(PAY
MEN
T,
PER
FOR
MAN
C
E&
IN
CEN
TIVI
SATI
O
N
MEC
HAN
ISM
)
3.3.
1 (iv
)
The
DP
shal
l ens
ure
that
ther
e is
no
brea
th o
f Ent
itlem
ent,
save
that
w
here
the
DP
obta
ins
the
Auth
ority
's pr
ior w
ritte
n ag
reem
ent i
t may
pr
ovid
e th
e us
er o
f the
ser
vice
with
up
to 1
5% in
exc
ess
of th
e re
leva
nt
pers
onal
sca
le a
nd E
ntitl
emen
t as
set o
ut in
the
Cod
es a
nd S
tand
ards
. Th
e D
P sh
all n
otify
the
Auth
ority
of a
ll ca
ncel
latio
n ch
arge
s, w
aste
d jo
urne
y ch
arge
s an
d ch
arge
s in
curre
d fo
r the
mov
emen
t of e
xces
s vo
lum
e, u
p to
15%
ove
r Ent
itlem
ent.
The
DP
may
offe
r add
ition
al e
xces
s to
use
rs o
f the
ser
vice
pro
vide
d th
at th
e D
P re
cove
rs a
ll ass
ocia
ted
cost
s di
rect
ly fr
om th
e us
er o
f the
se
rvic
e.
100.
00
°/0
PC2
.
Med
ium
2.
0 24
hrs
Serv
ice
Perfo
rman
ce
Failu
re P
oint
s w
ill ac
crue
for
each
Ser
vice
Pe
rform
ance
Failu
re a
nd
Rep
eat S
ervi
ce
Perfo
rman
ce
Failu
re a
gain
st
this
SO
R L
ine
Item
R
equi
rem
ent i
n ac
cord
ance
with
pa
ragr
aph
5 of
Sc
hedu
le 1
0 (P
AYM
ENT,
PE
RFO
RM
ANC
E
&
INC
ENTI
VISA
TI
Even
t