information-seeking behavior in the high-energy physics community tamar sadeh school of informatics,...
TRANSCRIPT
Information-Seeking Behavior in the High-Energy Physics Community
Tamar SadehSchool of Informatics, City University, London
Ex Libris
HCI conference, Prague, November 2008
2
Agenda
The high energy physics (HEP) community HEP information resources
SPIRES arXiv
The HEP survey What do HEP researchers say? The “magic spell” of SPIRES
and arXiv Conclusions
3
The high energy physics community
About 20,000 scientists Collaboration on a large, international
scale Specific needs
4
SPIRES—background
1960s: established at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC)
1974: computerized by teams from SLAC and Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY)
Today: a joint project of SLAC, DESY, and Fermilab; supported by the community
5
SPIRES
Provides access to the literature, people, institutions, research, and experiments in the fields of particle and astroparticle physics
11
arXiv
1991: founded at Los Alamos National Laboratories by Professor Paul Ginsparg
2001: moved to Cornell Serves as a repository
for preprints in physics, mathematics, statistics, computer science, and quantitative biology
October 2008: 500,000 articles
15
SPIRES and arXiv: community resources
Users generate primary and secondary content
Users take part in building tools and proofing content
Users are involved Resources are freely available to all Web 2.0 way before the term was coined!
16
The HEP Survey
Took place in early summer 2007 2,115 replies Multiple-choice and open-ended questions
GENTIL-BECCOT, Anne; MELE, Salvatore; HOLTKAMP, Annette; O'CONNELL, Heath B.; BROOKS, Travis C. (2008). Information resources in high-energy physics: Surveying the present landscape and charting the future course. arXiv:0804.2701 [online]. Available from www: http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.2701
20
Issues addressed in open-ended replies
Coverage Means of finding the information Effort required to find and obtain
information Related services
22
Coverage
Content: is everything there? What else is there?
Focus on HEP: advantage or disadvantage?
Availability of full text: is it freely available? Which version of it?
Period of coverage: are old materials available?
Type of materials: what about presentations, lecture notes, datasets?
23
Means of finding the information
Search Search for a “known” item Exploratory search
New submissions Navigation through a mesh of links
24
Effort required to find and obtain information
Search interface: is it easy enough? Is it sophisticated enough?
Search engine: is it fast? Is it accurate? Is it tolerant? Does it search the full text?
Overall experience: how long does it take to find and obtain the desired materials?
26
What is a good search interface?
“Beauty is in the eye of the beholder” About 30% of the respondents addressed
this question SPIRES: respondents are divided equally arXiv: ration of 1:10—most do not like the
search interface
27
Three resources, one framework
“I use SPIRES, arXiv, and Google in equal measure. SPIRES is the easiest way to find HEP papers; arXiv is the easiest way to find new papers; Google is the easiest way to find everything else.”
“The interplay between SPIRES and arXiv is a beautiful scenario.”
28
The “magic spell”
What makes SPIRES and arXiv so valuable? Created, maintained, and owned by the
community Free and easily accessible Focused on the community’s needs
29
Respondents say that clearly
“SPIRES is doing a wonderful service to the community.”
“SPIRES was a historical moment in science. Other fields should use it as a prototype.”
“SPIRES is simply the way we search for articles in HEP. Period. No competition. No competition needed.”
30
“the most is the tremendous service it [arXiv] does to the community for giving immediate access to new works and for the massive store it is”
“It's hard to imagine doing physics without arXiv.” “It would take a few articles to do justice to the
historical role of arXiv in the evolution of scientific information mediation… The speed, freedom and availability of published research results is by far the most important contribution of arXiv.”
31
Conclusions
HEP community resources are an extraordinary achievement
Content, user experience, and services are all important; however, the community effort makes the difference
SPIRES and arXiv need to adapt to the expectations of the “Google age” researchers to ensure continued success