information technology division executive office for administration and finance it service...
TRANSCRIPT
Information Technology DivisionExecutive Office for Administration and Finance
IT Service Excellence Committee
Jan. 19, 2012
Topic Desired Outcomes Discussion lead
Allotted time
Incident management discussion Ticket closure process and also 1st call resolution discussion
All 30 min
Change Management Update on activity in this process area and next steps
All 30 min
Wrap-up All 10
2
Agenda
3
Incident Management
• Some Secretariat KPI’s (EEA and LWD) have been showing a sizable Incident ticket backlog, possibly the result of delay in ticket closure (i.e. desire to obtain customer closure, or folks forgetting/neglecting to close the ticket or resource availability)
• ITIL best practice around ticket closure, is that once resolved an effort is made to confirm with the user or the customer of satisfaction with the resolution (experience tells us however, that this step can sometimes delay the ticket closure process)
• In an effort to support the work all the SD owners are doing on Incident processes, would it be helpful to have an agreed upon policy around ticket closure? (i.e. Would it be helpful to have a policy that says ticket will be closed xx days after resolution- leaving it up to the Secretariat to handle for tickets they own, in whatever way works best for them the customer notification )
4
Incident Management- Ticket closure
• Incident Management ticket best practice
• In ITIL nomenclature, Resolution is distinguished from Closure • SLA performance can be measured based on resolution
First Call Resolution – Information sharing
• One measure of how efficient we are in dealing with customer issues/requests
• Definition: Tickets by initial tier of escalation (typically Service Desk)
• Some work underway by EHS and ANF
5
Moving forward on Change Management
ITSEC Change Management roadmap
Significant Milestones EHS EEA ITD LWD EOE EPS ANF OSC HED MassDOT
Participation in Mo. Change mtg
Executive Support
Change Mgr. Designated ?
Change Calendar
CAB Established
Change policy & process published
Ticketing system- manual or systemic in place
Initial Metrics established
Metrics published
Post-implementation reviews established
6
*
* Really contingent on upgrading to V12 of EHS’s UniCenter platform** CAB is informal at this point; held at Senior staff on weekly basis; trying to adhere to 1 week advance notice*** OSC Published Policy is Being revised; Rationale ‘s TeamConcept is the ticketing system; will be establishing a CAB
**
***
URGENCY/ IMPACT
HighA service outage with broad impact to the Commonwealth, across one or more services that are not functioning, or whole sites or agencies are impacted, or an agency specific critical severity (outage) has occurred causing complete service outage (as opposed to for example, a performance degradation). (see attached Critical Applic. List). May effect public safety, transportation, health, financial servicing, or ability to deliver other public services.
MediumThere is impact to a portion of an agency or office, with one or more services to the Commonwealth, either not functioning or seriously degraded so the effect is that the agency’s mission is impacted. Also may apply if one or more very high profile parties are impacted (I.e. Secretary or direct report).
Low
Impact is to an individual or a small workgroup or the service impacted is not of a mission critical nature.
High Immediate action is required to restore service (s) or prevent failure of a service. No work around exists.
• FastLane user accounts inaccessible; Unable to Log into Citrix; Network to Lowell office out.•ESE Mail (Exchange) down effecting all 550 Secondary Ed. end users • -Complete loss of mission critical EHS application (ex. Beacon 3, Meditech, Family-net) •Critical gateway loss (AD, VG, Mass.Gov)•Complete Massmail outage at an EHS site•-Complete loss of Commonwealth mission critical service (HRCMS, MMARS, etc.)•DEP network down effecting 400 users; e-Permitting system down; •EEA’s network down causing ELA (Environment Law Enforcement) outage and public safety impact•LWD network ISP circuit failure all services impacted
•Registrar’s PC down; AutoCAD Licensing server down, Oracle Fin. Down•ELAR -Educator Licensing applic. down preventing all admins & teachers from obtaining licensing records & certifications •-Severe degradation of service from critical gateway (AD, VG, Mass.Gov) •Complete loss of MassMail at an EHS agency •EEA’s Waste site Cleanup data unavailable to Lic. Site professionals due to server outage• Bad network switch - Springfield LWD call center down•ANF: Governors Network down or Agency critical applic. out/degraded
MassDot Employee’s hard drive down
MediumA service outage occurred & there is a work around but service degraded or work around not sufficiently timely, too costly or too much effort. Or service has not failedbut potentially may do so.
•Critical voice service components are not functional (ex. Voice Mail)
•MassMail service for the Commonwealth is degrading
•ANF: E-mail node down effecting some users
•Nutrition Applic. Performance is degraded – health educators have difficulty obtaining necessary info.•IVR redundancy failover required causing degradation for Lawrence Call Center
•Single EEA user BB out•ANF: EE keyboard broken
LowA service outage has occurred and a work around exists and/or the remediation and/or needed procurement is in process.
•EEA’s HelpDesk HelpStar application unavailable but workaround via phones avail for short-term •ANF: Phone system outage but redundant node processing calls
EE PC down- temp. replacement not true image•ANF: switch port out but other is avail.
Local MASS.DOT printer outage – EE ability to do primary job no impactedESE Corrupted outlook file on siwillngle user –w/a is: use OWAPrinting for a group of users at An EHS site down, but alternative printing in the site available.
Commonwealth Incident Prioritization: ITSEC member examples
P1 P2 P3
P3P2
P3 P4 P4/P5
P4
14
15
Finalized SLOs for Incident Management
Note: Catastrophic and Critical (P1’s and P2’s) are on a 24x7 coverage; High and Medium (P3’s & P4’s) are on Business day Calendar
16
Change Type and key Change Management business rulesChange Type Assessme
nt requiredCAB approval required
Emergency CAB approval required
Only Change Manager approval required
Change Manager or Duty Manager (if off hours); LOB Owner and Product Owner (always) and (where appropriate) Customer agency IT executive approval required
Normal Yes Yes No No No (this requirement may possibly come at a later point of maturity in several months)
Standard No No No No NoEmergency No No Yes No Yes
ITD Change types (following ITIL definitions)
Establish SE Culture
Offer of Enterprise Service Delivery tool
Commonwealth Policies, Processes and Metrics for Incident Management
Develop Commonwealth SLOs and SLO Reporting
Commonwealth Policies, Processes &Metrics for Change Management
Common H/W & S/W Asset Mgt tool
Institute single Commonwealth Virtual Operations Culture
17
FY 11 Q2-Q4
We Are Here
Model fully implemented w/ Response time KPIs and IM categories
FY 12 FY 13
ITSECestablished
Internal ITD Pilot- Monthly LOB/SLO Rpting
Single Metrics reporting Framework established
ITSECWiki presence
ITD COMiTimplemented
1st Sec. Adoption COMiT
2nd Sec. Adoption COMiT
Follow-on COMiT Adoptions or integrations
Incident PrioritiesDefined & ISB approved
Begin reporting Incident Metrics
ITD LOB/SLO reporting to Customers
ITD IT Servicescustomer metrics
Change Types & Stnd WindowsDefined & ISB approved
Monthly CW wideChange Calendar
ITD weekly CM Calendar published
All ITD h/w s/w in Enterprise tool Commonwealth h/w s/w in Enterprise tool
Operational Framework Defined and agreed Monitoring tools rationalized/integrated in support of end to end SE model
Education & Marketing plan
ITSEC Road show ITSEC Day & Symposium
Commonwealth-wide Reporting of Incident SLO metrics
Service Excellence Program - 3 year Road Map
Begin publishing Change metrics