infrared laser satellite- aircraft communication · infrared laser satellite- aircraft...
TRANSCRIPT
Infrared Laser Satellite- Aircraft Communication
Paul ChristopherPFC AssociatesLeesburg, VA
NAECON 2018 pc
Satellite-Aircraft Laser Communication
• Chu and Hogg laser attenuation vs wavelength• Cloud attenuation from Barbaliscia’s Italsat
Solve -22.2 GHz attenuation maps-and 49.5 GHz attenuation maps for
cloud att’n, and water vapor att’n• Show worldwide satellite- ground 10 micron att’n• Show satellite – aircraft 10 micron att’n
- other IR wavelengths
NAECON 2018 pc
Chu & Hogg’s Attenuation v. Frequency, GHz
500. 1000. 5000. 10000. 50000. 100000.
Rain and Heavy Fog Att'n vs. Log(fGHz)
2
5
10.
20.
50.
100.
200.
dB10u
fog
rain
F,GHz
Fig. 3-1 Chu and Hogg’s Fog(top) and Rain Attenuation(dB) v. FrequencyNote, 10u at 30,000 GHz and 1u at 300,000 GHz
NAECON 2018 pc
Massive 10 Micron Attenuation for Ground-Satellite
NAECON ‘18
Ground Attenuation Relief with Quad Diversity, 100 km
NAECON 2018 pc
Satellite-Aircraft Att’n; 1,2,3 km Altitude
NAECON 2018 pc
10 Micron Attenuation over N. America (2015) with 30% Cloud Cover
Thule
dB
. A 30% cloudless sky was assumed.a. 100 km Quad diversity b. 200 km c. 300 km
Fig 1-1 Zenith Attenuation Estimates for Quad Diversity over North America 80% Reliability
NAECON 2018 pc
Clear Sky Estimates for U.S as Function
With Sunny Days=
Mathematica Feb15—80pc90pc.nb
NAECON 2018 pc
Att’n at 80% Availability, 10 Microns
Fig. 1-3 Ten Micron Zenith Attenuation (dB) Estimate for U.S., 80% Availability
NAECON 2018 pc
Higher Reliability with 10 Micron Links
These conservative attenuation estimates are expected to offer even lower attenuation with closer estimation.
Out[405]= , ,
80% Diversity, 200 km on a side
NAECON 2018 pc
Aircraft [2km]- Satellite 10Micron Att’n
NAECON 2018 pc
Low Att’n Aircraft[3km]-Satellite, 10 Microns
NAECON 2018 pc
Satellite-Aircraft Att’n; 1,2,3 km Altitude
NAECON 2018 pc
Aircraft- Satellite Att’n at 0.5 km Increments
6 Micron Att’n at ½ km increments
3 u Att’n at 0.5 km Increments
Ju Fig. 2-1 Compare Functional Estimates for Clear Atmosphere over the U.S and Europe
Compare Clear Skies in U.S., Europe
NAECON 2018 pc
Concluding Thoughts
• Satellite-Ground laser communication may be attractive
-if modest 80% availability-if large scale ground diversity, as Takayama
• Satellite- Aircraft laser comm is attractive-for altitude>2km
--both 10u, and 6u-especially on polar routes
--with LEOS or Brandon Molniya
NAECON 2018 pc
New Developments, Solar Impulse Flight Across U.S., Around World
• Bertrand Piccard and Swiss Research recognized Solar Power.
• They realized Solar Cells on the wing would offer good power.
• Strong, Rigid Wing• Carbon Fiber Frame• Wing Span like 747• Electric motors deliver 10 hp• Piccard concepts will be attractive for Satellite Solar
Arrays
AFM 2015 pc
Gerard O’Neill’s Solar Satellite Array Concept
• O’Neill’s offered many satellite concepts in the mid ‘70s• His book High Frontier(‘77) is available• Large solar panels on Geosynchronous satellites• Beam 2.2 GHz radio energy down to Large Ground
receiver.• Support faded when gas dropped, Ground Arrays limited.• O’Neill’s health declined in the early ’80s
- A National Loss- and a NASA Loss
NAECON 2018 pc
Would Satellite Solar Arrays Be Competitive?
• Warren Buffett investing 1.9 B in 656 wind turbines in Iowa.• Would add 1050 megawatts power by 2015.• May be interesting comparison for satellite solar arrays.
-e.g., 1km square array => 1300 MW solar input- if 30% efficiency => 400 MW to Denver
• German research in satellite solar arrays- Expect test satellite launch by 2016.
• Jalali solid state silicon lasers promise reliable link to Ground- 10 micron solid state lasers appear feasible- Low atmospheric loss
NAECON 2018 pc
Perovskite Complement to Jalali’sSilicon Laser [Sci Am, July 2015]
Attractive Satellite Orbits for Solar Arrays
• Gerard O’Neill favored Geostationary orbits-Stationary ground antennas for low cost
• Low Altitude, sun synchronous satellites-Perhaps (1/10) cost of Geostationary satellites-Solar Panels are perpendicular to Sun Vector-Active, difficult ground pointing.
• Brandon Molniya Orbits;GoodDownlinks to Denver,North-retains easy ground station pointing of Geos.
NAECON 2018 pc
Geosynchronous Arc for Wide Range of DownlinksMathematica Apr24GEO1.nb
NAECON 2018 pc
Solar Array at GEO; Power Density on US, with 10m geo antenna at 3 GHz [as S Band]
Mathematica Apr21—JiuxB.nb
NAECON 2018 pc
Power Density with 30 GHz, 10m Antenna at GEO
NAECON 2018 pc
Sun Synchronous Orbits for Cost Effective Solar Arrays
EOS at 1200kmDebris Field at 800kmDebris Field
A Chinese anti-satellite test in January 2007 left an enlarged debris field between centered near 800 km altitude. It stretches from 700 km to over 900 km altitud
Fig. 2-1 ASAT Debris Field, Fig. 2-2 EOS Higher (1000km) thanMean Altitude 800 km . Debris Field
Mathematica Apr27—EOScx.nb .NAECON 2018 pc
Sun Synchronous View at 701 kmInclination= 98.4 Deg.
NAECON 2018 pc
Emphasize the Late W.T. Brandon’s Concepts
• W.T. (Bill) Brandon observed key Molniya Features the 1970’s• Noted excellent N Hemisphere visibility• But Difficult/Expensive 3D Ground Tracking• Bill observed key changes in Ease of Tracking(eccentricity)• Sudden changes in tracking for .71< e < .73• E=0.722 for High Gain, single rotation axis antenna• E=0.722+ for High Gain, stationary antenna• E=0.729 for Higher Gain, stationary antenna• First, Bill was fascinated with Molniya Earth Views:
NAECON 2018 pc+
Brandon Molniya Valuable for Northern Hemisphere
Brandon Molniya 1 Hr Snaps Three Molniya Ground View
Molniya at 1 hr Intervals
Molniya seen from Ground Station
Mathematica July508—C3.nb
AFM 2015 pc
Compare 3D Views of Molniya; e=.64, .722Compare e.722, .64; Molniya seen from Ground Station
e=.7222 Hr,10Hr
e=.648 Hr10 Hr
e=.7226 Hr
e=.72218 Hr
AFM 2015 pc
Elevation PDF for Brandon4 Constellation+ 2 Antipodal GEOs
pE,Lat;4Brandon Molniya 2 Geo sats.
0
20
40
60
LAT
0
20
40
60
80
El
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
pdf0
20
40
60
LAT
0
0.
0
0
AFM 2015 pc
P ( E ) for Brandon4 Constellation
searched exhaustively for elevation angles at all time and locations to yield a probability density function as:pdf [elev, LAT]=
( 2 -1)where LAT =latitude
x=elevation
AFM 2015 pc
Sunspots and Temperature