infrastructure planning & funding gap report february 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap,...

27
Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 Prepared for Ealing Council in Support of the Community Infrastructure Levy

Upload: others

Post on 02-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report

February 2014

Prepared for Ealing Council in Support of the

Community Infrastructure Levy

Page 2: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

1

CONTENTS 01_Context and Approach

1.1_ Purpose of this Infrastructure Delivery Plan 1.2_ Definition of Infrastructure 1.3_ The CIL Regulations

1.4_ CIL examinations to date 1.5_ Work undertaken to produce this report

02_Ealing's Growth Profile

2.1_ Growth Context 2.2_ Housing Development Trajectory 2.3_ Non-residential Development Trajectory

03_Infrastructure Requirements

3.1_ Summary of Infrastructure Requirements

04_CIL Funding Gap

4.1_ CIL Eligibility 4.2_ Funding Position 4.3_ Aggregate Funding Gap 4.4_ CIL Funding Target 4.5_ Funding Gap after CIL

05_ Using CIL

5.1_ Regulation 123 List 5.2_ Planning Obligations SPD

06_Appendices

A_ Infrastructure Delivery Plan Project Schedule

B_ Summary Tables C_ Summary Charts D_ Extract of CIL Income Projection Model E_ Regulation 123 List (Draft)

Page 3: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

2

1. Context and Approach

1.1 Purpose of this Infrastructure Delivery Plan

This report forms part of the evidence base informing and supporting the development of the London Borough of Ealing’s Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) charging schedule. It up-dates the Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) that was produced as evidence for Ealing’s Develop (Core) Strategy, and set out the provision of infrastructure that the Council, local community and neighbourhoods necessary to support development.

CIL is one source of funding that will contribute towards paying for the infrastructure set out in the IDP. This report provides an up to date estimate of the cost of the infrastructure that is required to be funded by CIL, as well as providing an estimate of other funding sources available to fund infrastructure.

Infrastructure planning includes using best endeavours to predict, and to some degree shape the future. Actual usage will vary as people’s needs change and the nature of service provision adapts to users preferences, changes in policy, or takes advantage of new technology. In recognition of this ever-changing environment this IDP uses the appropriate available data to plan for growth, but represents a point in time and, as such, will be kept up to date by the Council.

1.2 Definition of Infrastructure

Infrastructure is defined in the Planning Act 2008 Item 216 as including:

• Roads and other transport facilities

• Flood defences

• Schools and other educational facilities

• Health facilities

• Social care and community safety facilities

• Sporting and recreational facilities

• Open spaces.

All projects that fall within this definition are considered to be eligible to be funded by CIL.

Page 4: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

3

1.3 The Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations

CIL was established through the Planning Act 2008 and is bound by a series of Regulations, the first of which came in to force in 2010. Several modifications and simplifications were put in place through the CIL (Amending) Regulations 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014. The Regulations are supported by the Secretary of State’s Community Infrastructure Levy Guidance (April 2013), which forms part of the legal framework.

The Regulations require a local authority to establish a charging schedule setting out CIL rate(s). The rates should be set at a level that strikes an appropriate balance between the desirability of funding infrastructure from CIL and the potential effects of the imposition of CIL on the economic viability of development across an area.

Figure 1.1 shows the process of gathering and reviewing, in parallel, evidence on viability and infrastructure needs. This report focuses on the infrastructure planning, but was undertaken alongside the CIL Viability Evidence Base Report by BNP Paribas Real Estate. Figure 1.1: The CIL evidence gathering and rate setting process summarised

With regards to the infrastructure planning process, Ealing considered what infrastructure is needed in its area to support development when it produced its Core Strategy Development Plan Document or Local Plan. There is no need to duplicate this process for CIL. However, as some of the infrastructure projects have been delivered or additional service planning has taken place since the IDP was completed in 2010, the following extract from the CIL guidance is particularly applicable:

Page 5: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

4

‘If an authority considers that the infrastructure planning underpinning its relevant Plan is weak or does not reflect the latest priorities, it may undertake additional bespoke infrastructure planning to identify its infrastructure funding gap. This work may be limited to those projects requiring funding from the levy, rather than covering all the potential infrastructure projects for the area.’ – Item 16 CIL Guidance April 2013.

Consequently, the IDP has undergone a partial up-date. That process has included an assessment of what other known or expected funding sources are likely to be available to establish whether there is an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL.

1.4 CIL examinations to date

To date, there is an increasing body of published CIL examination reports (see Shropshire, Newark and Sherwood, Redbridge, Portsmouth, London Mayor, Huntingdonshire, Wandsworth, Wycombe, Barnet, Croydon and Poole) and infrastructure planning has not featured strongly; generally limited to two to three paragraphs. Each of the Councils had a recently adopted Core Strategy and each of the Councils undertook additional infrastructure planning in support of CIL, which places them in a similar position as Ealing at the time of their examinations.

The message from the Examiners appears to be that infrastructure planning should focus on ascertaining the residual funding gap (aggregate gap minus projected CIL income). Where the projected CIL income does not exceed the projected aggregate funding gap the rates are justifiable, subject to tests on the impact of CIL rates on development viability. 1.5 Work undertaken to produce this report

The following activities were undertaken for this commission:

• Work with local service providers and infrastructure providers to refresh infrastructure needs assessment based on service planning;

• Review of the Borough’s capital programme, updating information on funding already committed to infrastructure projects;

• Work with services and infrastructure providers to establish fair and reasonable estimates of funding that is likely to be available in the future (mainstream grants, allocated project funds, outstanding s106, and capital receipts);

• Building a CIL income projection model based on the Council’s development forecasts.

Page 6: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

5

2. Ealing’s Growth Profile

2.1 Growth Context

Ealing is located in West London, and benefits from an import and strategic location in that it is where the Thames Valley (the UKs highest performing sub-region) meets inner London, lying between central London and Heathrow airport. It is the third largest London borough in terms of population and one of its most ethnically diverse.

In terms of growth, new homes are needed to accommodate the projected increases in population, and address housing needs in terms of a current lack of affordable homes for young families, a general trend of high house prices and problems of affordability, and a shortage of housing options for many households.

Ealing has excellent transport accessibility, with both direct connections to Heathrow Airport and to central London. Crossrail will run through the Borough, with five stations having Crossrail services, planned for 2019, reducing journey times to central London and Heathrow.

Development is focused along two key corridors, one centred along the Uxbridge Road, featuring key town centres and Crossrail stations, and the A40 corridor, which includes Park Royal. There are a small number of key sites, which can deliver significant growth, including Southall Gasworks, a number of former Council estates currently undergoing re-modelling, and town centres such as Ealing Broadway, and transport nodes such as Southall and North Acton. There are also large areas of stable suburban residential areas with lower growth potential such as Ealing and Hanwell.

The planning challenge in Ealing is to provide homes in appropriate locations to those who need it, and allow sustainable economic growth, focused in the two strategic corridors, whilst protecting the residential areas and green spaces in the hinterland. There is also a need to protect existing and provide new community infrastructure and services.

Page 7: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

6

2.2 Housing Trajectory

The Housing Trajectory (LBE Housing Trajectory 2011-12) forecasts how many homes will be provided within Ealing, for the period from 2012– 2027. This is driven by development interest and the Council's requirement to meet the London Plan Housing Targets. The trajectory has evolved since the Core Strategy, as updates to the Housing Trajectory have been produced by the GLA. Ealing is projecting that 104 less homes will be built than were indicated by the Core Strategy. A comparison between the figures used in the Ealing Infrastructure Delivery Plan, in the adopted Core Strategy and the 2012 trajectory can be seen in figure 2.2.1: Figure 2.2.1: Housing Trajectory Comparison

Adopted Development Strategy 2012

Housing Trajectory 2011-2012

Projected over plan period

12,407 (from large sites) 12,674 (from large sites)

3255 (from SHLAA small sits)

Totals 12,407 15,929

The mix of housing units in terms of property size and property type is also relevant. Providers were asked to assume the following proportion of development by size, in accordance with the 2009 Ealing Housing Strategy: Figure 2.2.2: Percentage of housing units in terms of size and property type

Property size Proportion of development (social rented)

Proportion of development (intermediate)

1 bedroom 20% 35% 2 bedroom 30% 50% 3 bedroom 25% 15% 4+ bedroom 25% 0% Ealing’s Core Strategy states that at least 50% of properties should be Social / Affordable, subject to viability.

2.3 Non- residential Development Trajectory

2.3.1 Retail CIL income for retail has been based on an analysis of retail floorspace set out in the Ealing Retail Needs Study 2011 for the period 2011-2026. The phasing has been adjusted to align with the CIL Income projections phasing. The study provides separate information for each district and each type of retail. For the purposes of projecting CIL income the development data is organised in two Charging Zones (Ealing & rest of the borough, see also par. 4.4) and in two categories: large retail (superstores and warehouses) and all other retail (small stores, comparison retail, food and drink leisure- see also par.4.4).

Page 8: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

7

2.3.2 Student Housing To establish an adequate CIL income projection it is necessary to establish a reliable development trajectory for each development type. As part of the research process the Student Demand in Ealing Report (March 2012) was reviewed alongside past permissions where they were available for 2010-11.

This data was insufficient to calculate an average net growth per year although it did show that recent permissions account for the majority of the predicted Student Housing demand in Ealing. In total, there is a growth (permissions and complete projects) of approximately 28,592sqm for the period 2006-2013. However, it is not possible to say with any certainty that student housing development will continue at the same scale for the next 20 years.

It is assumed that the scale of any income from this specialist type of housing is likely to be negligible when compared to revenue from mainstream housing, and will not therefore have a significant impact on Ealing's infrastructure funding gap.

2.3.3 Hotels To determine the future hotel development trajectory Ealing's the Hotel Demand Study (June 2006) was reviewed. This established that there was a need for 1000 rooms for the period 2007-2026. Τhe hotel development documents (Hotel Development Monitor 2010, Hotel Development 2011, Permissions 2010-11), show that a total of 822 hotel rooms have been completed or given permission between 2008 and 2012. The amount of rooms left to deliver against the predicted demand is not significant, so will not have a significant impact on Ealing's infrastructure funding gap.

Page 9: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

8

3. Infrastructure Requirements

3.1 Summary of Infrastructure Requirements

Figure 3.2 shows a summary of project numbers and cost for each infrastructure theme covering the whole lifetime of the plan. For a detailed list of projects see Appendix A Infrastructure Delivery Plan Project Schedule. Figure 3.2: Summary of project numbers and cost for each infrastructure area

Infrastructure Category

Total no of

projects

No of CIL

eligible projects

No of costed CIL

eligible projects

over plan period

2014- 26

Total Cost of Infrastructure

over plan period 2014-

26

Total No of

projects 2014/15-

16/17

Total No of CIL

eligible projects 2014/15-

16/17

No of costed CIL

eligible projects 2014/15-

16/17

Total Cost of Infrastructure

2014/15- 16/17

Adult Services 3 3 0 TBC 3 3 0 TBC Children & Families 1 1 1 £334,000 1 1 1 £334,000 Community and Leisure 18 17 15 £138,209,955 15 15 14 £110,709,955

Education 5 5 3 £344,334,000 4 4 3 £223,434,000 Emergency Services 1 1 0 TBC 1 1 0 TBC Employment and Skills 1 1 1 £1,500,000 1 1 1 £1,500,000 Energy, utilities and Physical Infrastructure 7 7 4 £26,950,000 3 3 1 £250,000 Green Infrastructure 13 12 11 £9,962,000 11 10 11 £9,962,000

Health 6 6 0 TBC 6 6 0 TBC

Regeneration 8 8 8 £17,167,000 8 8 8 £17,167,000

Transport 14 14 13 £79,907,500 13 13 12 £69,907,500

Waste 1 1 0 TBC 1 1 0 TBC

Total 78 76 56 £618,364,455 67 66 51 £433,264,455 Number of categories 12

Page 10: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

9

4. CIL Funding Gap

4.1 CIL Eligibility

In order to establish the numbers and cost of CIL eligible projects an analysis of the updated 12-year Infrastructure Project Schedule has been completed. However, the Council has focused on a 3 year period as cost and income estimates are much more likely to be accurate over the short to medium term rather than long term. Furthermore, the Council plans to review its CIL Charging Schedule within a period of three to five years to keep it up to date with developing market conditions.

Over the 3 year period 2014/15 - 2016/17:

• There are a total of 78 projects from the 12 infrastructure categories.

• 66 of the projects are CIL eligible.

• 51 of the CIL eligible projects have up to date cost estimates.

• The total cost of these 51 projects is £433,264,455.

• The majority of the cost (52%) is attributed to Education.

• Community & Leisure and Transport are the other significant contributors with 26% and 16% respectively.

For more details please see Appendix A Infrastructure Delivery Plan Project Schedule, Appendix B Summary Tables and Appendix C Summary Charts.

Page 11: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

10

4.2 Funding Position

In order to establish a funding gap a Charging Authority is required to calculate the funding from other sources. We have extracted information from the Capital Investment Programme 2013 - 2017, with projections for 2014 - 2017 and, for Transport projects from the Local Implementation Plan. The funding position for 2014/15- 2017/18 is:

• A large proportion of the funding available during this period is already allocated to projects at are underway.

• The total available funding over the period is £229,712,000 and the vast majority (£127,434,000) is associated with a combination of funding from Grant, Partnership, S106, Borrowing & Mainstream Funding.

All the contributors can be seen in the following table (See also Appendix B): Figure 4.2: Funding contributors

Funding Estimated Total % total

Grant/ Mainstream Funding £2,200,000 1.0%

Mainstream Funding £19,696,000 8.5%

Grant/ Mainstream Funding/ Partnership/ S106/ borrowing £127,434,000 55.5%

Project Funding form Revenue £80,382,000 35.0%

Total funding £229,712,000 100% 4.3 Funding Gap

The funding gap for the three years period (2014/15- 2016/17) is the Total Cost of Infrastructure (shown in section 4.1) minus funding from other Sources (shown in section 4.2):

£433,264,455 - £229,712,000 = £203,552,455

Consequently, the funding gap can be said to be circa £204m.

Page 12: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

11

4.4 CIL Funding Target

Using the Housing Trajectory and Commercial Development Trajectory supplied by Ealing, a CIL Income Projection model was built to enable the Council to sensitivity test the funding that would be generated by various rates of CIL.

The CIL rates set out below are taken from the Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule Feb 2013:

CHARGING AREA

CIL RATES £/sq m

Residential

Large Retail (Warehouses/ retail parks / superstores)

All other Retail Student Housing Hotel

1. Ealing District £100 £100 £30 £100 £100

2. Rest of the Borough £50 £100 £30 £50 £50

The following variables were applied to the housing trajectory figures to generate CIL income projections:

• 50% affordable housing

• 70% net additional floorspace

• 70sqm average unit size.

The projected CIL income is:

2014-2017 £ 8,870,780

2018-2022 £ 10,925,200

2023-2027 £ 11,884,615

See Appendix D for an extract from the CIL Income Projection Model.

4.5 Funding Gap after CIL

The residual funding gap after CIL is calculated by subtracting the projected CIL income from the funding gap (in 4.3 above and Appendix B):

Aggregate funding gap – Project CIL income = Residual funding gap

£203,552,455– £8,870,780= £194,681,675

The income from CIL is not likely to meet or exceed the funding gap, therefore Ealing can demonstrate the requirement to charge a CIL at the rates proposed.

Page 13: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

12

5. Using CIL

5.1 Regulation 123 List

The Council is required to set out a list of infrastructure schemes, which Ealing may wholly or partly fund through CIL. The Council can then not seek s106 planning obligations for items of infrastructure on that list. The list can be published and revised at any time after the Council has adopted a CIL subject to appropriate local consultation. If an infrastructure scheme is on the Regulation 123 List a S106 cannot be negotiated to contribute towards that infrastructure scheme. If an infrastructure scheme is not on the list, up to five S106 planning obligations may be pooled to contribute towards the cost. This is to ensure that 'double-charging' of developers is avoided. A draft Infrastructure List has been prepared and is included within Appendix E. It should be noted that the draft will represent proposals for consultation only and should not affect S106 negotiations. It is intended that a Regulation 123 List will be published at the same time as the final CIL Charging Schedule. The list is likely to be refined to include specific investment project, which will be subject to further consultation alongside the next iteration of the Council’s Draft Charging Schedule.

5.2 Planning Obligations SPD – Statement of Intent

Planning obligations, secured through Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 are legal agreements primarily between local planning authorities and landowners or developers. They can impose financial and non-financial obligations. As stated above, after the adoption of a CIL charging schedule, or after April 2015, whichever is earlier, it will not be possible to pool planning obligations from more than five developments for infrastructure purposes, even if the infrastructure concerned is not included in the Regulation 123 list. However, the introduction of CIL is not intended to totally replace the Section 106 planning obligations system, which will continue to operate for the securing of on site affordable housing, and justified site specific mitigation requirements. Consequently, planning obligations will be used to mitigate the impact of a development, which without that mitigation, would render the development unacceptable in planning terms. Ealing will secure planning obligations in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework and 2010 Community Infrastructure Levy Regulation 122, which states that planning obligations should only be sought where they meet the following tests:

• Necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms • Directly related to the development, and • Fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the development.

Following the adoption of CIL Ealing will publish a revised Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document to set out the Council’s expectations for Section 106 negotiations. In particular, it will be used to secure affordable housing. With regards to infrastructure planning obligations may be required for the following matters:

• Employment Training and Enterprise Support

Page 14: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

13

• On-site open space

• Transport and highways works

• Air Quality

• Refuse and recycling

• Sustainable transport assessment

• District heating

• Controlled parking & car clubs

Page 15: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

Appendix A_ Infrastructure Delivery Plan Project Schedule

Project Information Cost & Funding Location Timing Delivery

Infrastructure Category Programme CIL

Eligible Project Description Estimated

Total Cost (to 2016/17)

Estimated Total Cost over Plan

Period 2014-26

Estimated Total

Funding (to 2016/17)

Estimated Total

Funding over Plan

Period 2014-26

Funding Source Funding Gap (to 2016/17)

Potential Funding Source

Area Overview Who? Risks / contingency

How? (delivery mechanism /

funding sources)

Adult Services Y NORTH WEST LONDON LD

PROJECT TBC TBC TBC Grant TBC 2013-2017

Ealing Council

Capital Programme

Adult Services Y INGLIS ROAD TBC TBC TBC

Mainstream Funding TBC

2013-2017

Ealing Council

Capital Programme

Adult Services Y INGLIS ROAD TBC TBC TBC Grant TBC

2013-2017

Ealing Council

Capital Programme

Education Y

NURSERIES Children’s Centre Strategy

Phase 3 – 4 Children’s Centres at Primary Schools: Hathaway, Perivale, West Twyford and Wood End

Library

£2,900,000 £2,900,000 £2,200,000

Grant/ Mainstream

Funding £700,000.00

Borough-wide

London Borough of Ealing (LBE)

Surestart / Capital

Programme

Education Y

PRIMARY EDUCATION (P) 14.5FE further expansions

and new schools (in addition to 25.5FE provided to date)

£187,434,000 £187,434,000 £127,434,000

Grant/ Mainstream

Funding/ Partnership/

S106/ borrowing

£60,000,000.00

Further DfE grant, council

borrowing, and council

capital.

Borough-wide

LBE and DfE (in the case of directly

funded free schools)

Capital Programme, DfE funding, planning obligations, other

grants

Education Y

SECONDARY (S) 30FE expansions and new

schools (21FE by 2019 and a further 9FE by 2026)

£33,100,000.00 £154,000,000 £33,100,000

Grant/ Mainstream

Funding/ Partnership/

S106/ borrowing

£-

Further DfE grant, council

borrowing, and council

capital

Borough-wide

LBE and DfE (in the case of directly

funded free schools)

Capital Programme, DfE funding, planning obligations, other

grants

Education Y

FE/HE University of West London -

St. Mary's Road campus redevelopment

TBC TBC TBC TBC Ealing Univ. of

West London

Univ. of West London Estates

Strategy

Education Y (FE/HE ) Post 16 education - Replacement Ealing Diploma

and Education site TBC TBC TBC TBC TBC

LBE 14 to 19 Partner-ship

TBC. Possibly Skills Funding

Agency or Young People’s Learning

Agency

Green Infrastructure North Acton Station Square £3,000,000 £3,000,000 £3,000,000 S106 £- Acton LBE

S106 / grant funding

Green Infrastructure Y Southall Gasworks TBC TBC TBC S106 TBC Southall LBE S106

Green Infrastructure Y

Redevelopment of Brent Lodge Park Environment

Centre/Stables £223,000 £223,000 £- TBC £223,000.00 Ealing

Green Infrastructure Y Redevelopment of

Horsenden Farm £639,000 £639,000 £- TBC £639,000.00 GNP

Green Infrastructure Y

Parks infrastructure renewal incl. footpath, fencing,

signage, bins and benches £2,000,000 £2,000,000 £-

Mainstream Funding and

S106 £2,000,000.00

Borough-wide

Capital Programme

Page 16: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

15

Project Information Cost & Funding Location Timing Delivery

Infrastructure Category Programme CIL

Eligible Project Description Estimated

Total Cost (to 2016/17)

Estimated Total Cost over Plan

Period 2014-26

Estimated Total

Funding (to 2016/17)

Estimated Total

Funding over Plan

Period 2014-26

Funding Source Funding Gap (to 2016/17)

Potential Funding Source

Area Overview Who? Risks / contingency

How? (delivery mechanism /

funding sources)

Green Infrastructure Y Playground renewal £1,000,000 £1,000,000 £-

Parks Capital Programme and

S106 £1,000,000.00

Borough-wide

Green Infrastructure Y Tree planting and

replacement £500,000 £500,000 £-

Mainstream Funding and

S106 £500,000.00

Borough Wide

Green Infrastructure Y

CEMETERIES Greenford Park Cemetery Extension and drainage improvements

£500,000 £500,000 £- TBC £500,000.00 GNP

Green Infrastructure Y

BRENT LODGE PARK ANIMAL CENTRE refurbishment of

centre buildings and enclosures

£500,000 £500,000 £100,000 SIF £400,000.00 Ealing

Green Infrastructure Y Upgrade sports Pavilions £2,000,000 £2,000,000 £-

Mainstream Funding and

S106 £2,000,000.00

Borough Wide

Green Infrastructure Y Public Art, Community

Events £800,000 £800,000 £- Mainstream

Funding £800,000.00 Borough

Wide Green

Infrastructure Y Allotments and nature conservation projects £800,000 £800,000 £-

Mainstream Funding £800,000.00

Borough wide

Green Infrastructure Y Cyclo Park £1,000,000 £1,000,000 £-

Mainstream Funding, grants

and S106 £1,000,000.00 TBC

Community and Leisure Y

SPORTS AND LEISURE Acton Town Hall Project:

New leisure centre, swimming pools, library and

community space

£19,300,000 £19,300,000 £19,300,000

Sale of Council property /

Mainstream / grant funding

£- Acton 2013-2017

LBE Private sector

Capital Programme /

Planning Obligations

Community and Leisure Y Replace Gurnell Leisure

Centre £25,000,000 £25,000,000 £782,000 Mainstream

Funding £24,218,000.00 GNP LBE Capital

Programme

Community and Leisure Y

Hanwell Community Centre/ Ravenor Farm Community

Centre £6,600,000 £6,600,000 £605,000

Mainstream Funding £5,995,000.00 Ealing/GNP LBE

Major Projects/Property

Strategy

Community and Leisure Y HERITAGE

Pitzhanger Manor £7,000,000 £7,000,000 £5,500,000 Mainstream

Funding £1,500,000.00 Ealing LBE

HLF, Arts Council, Ealing Council,

Trusts & Foundations

Community and Leisure Y Gunnersbury Park £22,000,000 £48,000,000 £-

Mainstream Funding , Heritage

Lottery Fund and borough contributions inc from s106

£22,000,000.00 Ealing LBE -73000 Capital Programme

Community and Leisure Y Ealing Town Hall TBC TBC TBC TBC Ealing LBE

Page 17: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

16

Project Information Cost & Funding Location Timing Delivery

Infrastructure Category Programme CIL

Eligible Project Description Estimated

Total Cost (to 2016/17)

Estimated Total Cost over Plan

Period 2014-26

Estimated Total

Funding (to 2016/17)

Estimated Total

Funding over Plan

Period 2014-26

Funding Source Funding Gap (to 2016/17)

Potential Funding Source

Area Overview Who? Risks / contingency

How? (delivery mechanism /

funding sources)

Community and Leisure Y

Greenford - develop library and information hub (cost

includes Pitshanger) £227,000 £227,000 £227,000

Mainstream Funding and

S106 £- GNP LBE

Capital Programme and

S106 Community and Leisure Y Refurbishment of Pitshanger

Library £175,000 £175,000 £175,000 Mainstream

Funding £- 2013-2017 LBE

Capital Programme

Community and Leisure Y

Southall - investment to improve standard of

provision, develop library and information hub

£3,049,000 £3,049,000 £3,049,000 Capital

Programme £- Southall LBE Capital

Programme

Community and Leisure Y Consolidate library archives

store TBC TBC TBC TBC

Borough-wide

search LBE

Community and Leisure Y

Sports pitches improvement: Rectory Park, Ealing Central

Sports Ground £2,500,000 £2,500,000 £- TBC £2,500,000.00

GNP, Ealing

LBE Env. & Leisure

LBE Capital Programme

Community and Leisure Y

COMMUNITY CENTRES PRIORITY WORKS &

IMPROVEMENTS £- £1,500,000 £-

Mainstream funding £-

2013-2017 LBE

Captal Programme

Community and Leisure Y

LORD HALSBURY PLAYING FIELDS SPORTS CENTRE (car

park & lighting) £1,275,000 £1,275,000 £1,179,000

Mainstream funding £96,000.00

2013-2017 LBE

Captal Programme

Community and Leisure Y Borough Wide Infrastructure

Renewal Programme £15,000,000 £15,000,000 £10,500,000 Mainstream

funding £4,500,000.00 Borough-

wide 2013-2017 LBE

Captal Programme

Community and Leisure Y New Places for People £2,500,000 £2,500,000 £650,000

Mainstream funding £1,850,000.00

Borough wide

2014-2017 LBE

Capital Programme

Community and Leisure Y

SHOPPING PARADE STREETSCAPE, RENEWAL

PROGRAMME £5,603,955 £5,603,955 £2,000,000

Revenue contribution £3,603,955.00

Borough-wide

2013-2017 LBE

Captal Programme

Community and Leisure Y STREET LIGHTING IN CRIME

HOT SPOTS £480,000 £480,000 £105,000 Mainstream

Funding £375,000.00 Borough-

wide 2013-2017 LBE

Captal Programme

Community and Leisure

LED street lighting Upgrade programme £6,800,000 £6,800,000 £6,800,000

Mainstream Funding £-

Borough-wide

2014-2017 LBE

Capital Programme

Employment and Skills

Dine in Southall - Employment

& Skills, Hospitality &

Catering Training, including

Apprenticeships

Y Southall Manor House £1,500,000 £1,500,000 £850,000 Mainstream

Funding £650,000.00 Mayor's

Regeneration Fund, GLA

Southall LBE GLA MRF funding

Property Strategy,

Community Centres Strategy, LBE Groundwork,

GLA

Transport Y Cycling initiatives in Outer London town centres £5,000,000 £5,000,000 £- £5,000,000.00

Borough-wide

2010-2021 LBE MTS

Transport Y

Crossrail Station enhancements Access and

integregation improvements to complement new pan-

London railway. To include: Acton Mainline, Ealing

Broadway, West Ealing,

£- £10,000,000 £- £6,500,000 TfL Crossrail

Complementary Funding

£- Developer funding

Borough-wide

2015-2021

LBE TFL MTS

Page 18: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

17

Project Information Cost & Funding Location Timing Delivery

Infrastructure Category Programme CIL

Eligible Project Description Estimated

Total Cost (to 2016/17)

Estimated Total Cost over Plan

Period 2014-26

Estimated Total

Funding (to 2016/17)

Estimated Total

Funding over Plan

Period 2014-26

Funding Source Funding Gap (to 2016/17)

Potential Funding Source

Area Overview Who? Risks / contingency

How? (delivery mechanism /

funding sources)

Hanwell and Southall stations.

Transport Y

Cycling initiatives in Outer London town centres/ Ealing

'Mini-Holland' Bid - implementation of a

widespread cycle network, secure cycle parking and Ealing Biking Schools Hub

£23,000,000 £23,000,000 £- TfL Cycle Fund £23,000,000.00 Developer and other funding

Borough-wide

2014-2021 LBE

LB Ealing Mini-Holland Bid 2013

Transport Y

Ealing Broadway Interchange Major Scheme -Enhanced public realm, green space,

train and bus passenger circulation, information and

waiting facilities.

£5,000,000 £5,000,000 £4,300,000

TfL Major Scheme, LB Ealing and developer

funding

£700,000.00 Developer funding Ealing 2010-

2015 LBE TFL LIP

Transport Y

Southall Broadway Major Scheme -Urban realm

improvements plus enhancements for walking, cycling, road safety, buses and smoothing traffic flow.

£6,900,000 £6,900,000 £4,858,000

TfL LIP funding, Mayor's

Regeneration Fund & LB

Ealing

£2,042,000.00 Developer funding Southall 2010-

2015 LBE TFL LIP

Transport WestTrans Y

Sudbury Village Major Scheme: The vision is to

'create a vibrant, interesting and flexible street for local

people and visitors, offering a welcoming and sociable

village-like environment with convenient facilities and

access to sustainable movement opportunities'.

£2,000,000 £2,000,000 £220,000

LB Ealing, LB Harrow & LB

Brent £1,780,000.00

Developer funding, TfL

Major Scheme Bid

(TBC)

Greenford 2010-2015

LBE, LB Harrow, LB Brent & TfL

LIPs, TfL Major Bid Scheme

Transport WestTrans Y

Stanmore to Thames Greenway cycle route: Development of a high

quality, connected leisure cycling route between

Stanmore and the River Thames passing through the Boroughs of Harrow, Brent, Ealing and Hounslow. The

aim of the route is to provide opportunities for people new

to cycling to have opportunities for traffic free cycling within an urban area, and to also offer improved

links to parks, visitor attractions and utility cycling destinations. The route will

therefore provide both a leisure facility and an

£750,000 £750,000 £100,000 TfL Greenways

Funding £650,000.00 TfL Major

Scheme Bid (TBC)

Stanmore and the

River Thames passing through

the Boroughs

of Harrow, Brent,

Ealing and Hounslow

2010-2015

LBE, LB Harrow, LB Brent, LB

Hounslow & TfL

LIPs, TfL Major

Bid Scheme

Page 19: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

18

Project Information Cost & Funding Location Timing Delivery

Infrastructure Category Programme CIL

Eligible Project Description Estimated

Total Cost (to 2016/17)

Estimated Total Cost over Plan

Period 2014-26

Estimated Total

Funding (to 2016/17)

Estimated Total

Funding over Plan

Period 2014-26

Funding Source Funding Gap (to 2016/17)

Potential Funding Source

Area Overview Who? Risks / contingency

How? (delivery mechanism /

funding sources)

additional element of the sustainable transport

network.

Transport Y

Southall Cycle/Pedestrian bridge - Cycling and walking enhancement on traffic-free

route

£4,300,000 £4,300,000 £- tbc £4,300,000.00

Developer funding, TfL,

Mayors Regeneration

Fund, LB Ealing etc

Southall 2010-2021

LBE TFL TBC

Transport Y

Tentelow Lane access bridge - additional congestion relief/access route for

Southall

£12,000,000 £12,000,000 £- tbc £12,000,000.00

Developer funding, TfL,

Mayors Regeneration

Fund, LB Ealing etc

Southall 2010-2021

LBE TFL TBC

Transport Y

Canal Towpath Upgrades -Cycling and walking

enhancements on traffic-free routes

£1,540,000 £1,540,000 £- tbc £1,540,000.00

Developer funding, TfL,

Mayors Regeneration

Fund, LB Ealing etc

Borough-wide

2014-2021

LBE TFL TBC

Transport Y

LIP Corridors & Neighbourhoods programme

(24 schemes tbc) multi-modal transport

improvements across LB Ealing

TBC TBC TBC £683,000 TfL LIP Funding TBC Developer funding

Borough-wide

2014-2017

LBE TFL LIP

Transport Y

Bus Stop Accessibility enhancements and provision

of Countdown (passenger information system)

£1,330,000 £1,330,000 £275,000 TfL LIP Funding £1,055,000.00 Developer funding

Borough-wide

2014-2017

LBE TFL LIP

Transport Y Road maintenance and bridge strengthening £2,437,500 £2,437,500 £1,650,000 TfL LIP Funding £787,500.00 Developer

funding Borough-

wide 2014-2017

LBE TFL LIP

Page 20: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

19

Project Information Cost & Funding Location Timing Delivery

Infrastructure Category Programme CIL

Eligible Project Description Estimated

Total Cost (to 2016/17)

Estimated Total Cost over Plan

Period 2014-26

Estimated Total

Funding (to 2016/17)

Estimated Total

Funding over Plan

Period 2014-26

Funding Source Funding Gap (to 2016/17)

Potential Funding Source

Area Overview Who? Risks / contingency

How? (delivery mechanism /

funding sources)

Transport Y

School Travel Measures - Safety and pollution

reduction measures to encourage children to walk

and cycle to school

£5,650,000 £5,650,000 £753,000 TfL LIP Funding £4,897,000.00 Developer funding

Borough-wide

2014-2017

LBE TFL LIP

Regeneration Y TOWN CENTRE REGENERATION £3,179,000 £3,179,000 £-

Mainstream Funding £3,179,000.00

Borough-wide

2013-2017 LBE

Captal Programme

Regeneration Y GREENFORD SERVICE CENTRE £5,400,000 £5,400,000 £-

Mainstream Funding £5,400,000.00

Sale of Council

property Greenford 2013-

2017 LBE Captal

Programme

Regeneration Y SHAPING SOUTHALL PROGRAMME (MRF) £3,500,000 £3,500,000 £- Grant £3,500,000.00 Southall 2013-

2017 LBE Captal

Programme

Regeneration Y EALING BROADWAY PUBLIC REALM IMPROVEMENT £3,500,000 £3,500,000 £-

Mainstream Funding £3,500,000.00 Ealing 2013-

2017 LBE Captal

Programme

Regeneration Y EALING BROADWAY PUBLIC REALM IMPROVEMENT £700,000 £700,000 £- S106 £700,000.00 Ealing 2013-

2017 LBE Captal

Programme

Regeneration Y BOROUGHWIDE SHOPFRONT IMPROVEMENTS £133,000 £133,000 £-

Mainstream Funding £133,000.00

Borough-wide

2013-2017 LBE

Captal Programme

Regeneration Y BOROUGHWIDE SHOPFRONT IMPROVEMENTS £130,000 £130,000 £-

Revenue contribution £130,000.00

Borough-wide

2013-2017 LBE

Captal Programme

Regeneration Y IMPROVING SOUTH RD STREETSCAPE £625,000 £625,000 £-

Mainstream Funding £625,000.00 Southall 2013-

2017 LBE Captal

Programme

Energy, utilities and

Physical Infrastructure

Y ENERGY, UTILITIES

Sewerage – Thames Tunnel Project

TBC TBC TBC TBC

Acton Storm Tanks

Thames Water

Thames Water Capital

Programme

Energy, utilities and

Physical Infrastructure

Y Canal waterways-wall repair £250,000 £250,000 £- £250,000.00 Hanwell British

Waterways British

Waterways

Energy, utilities and

Physical Infrastructure

Y Gas & Electric TBC TBC TBC TBC Borough-

wide

National Grid/ Local

energy suppliers

Energy, utilities and

Physical Infrastructure

Y Energy - Decentralised energy networks TBC TBC TBC TBC

Borough-wide

2021-2026

LBE/Energy Services

Company(s) (ESCO's)

Energy, utilities and

Physical Infrastructure

Y South Acton Decentralised Heating Network £- £4,000,000 £- £- Acton 2021-

2026

Energy Services

Company(s) (ESCO's)

network costs for 4km

network, excluding

cost of the energy

centre & any modifications required by buildings to connect to

the heat network

Page 21: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

20

Project Information Cost & Funding Location Timing Delivery

Infrastructure Category Programme CIL

Eligible Project Description Estimated

Total Cost (to 2016/17)

Estimated Total Cost over Plan

Period 2014-26

Estimated Total

Funding (to 2016/17)

Estimated Total

Funding over Plan

Period 2014-26

Funding Source Funding Gap (to 2016/17)

Potential Funding Source

Area Overview Who? Risks / contingency

How? (delivery mechanism /

funding sources)

Energy, utilities and

Physical Infrastructure

Y Southall Decentralised

Heating Network- Extended as shown in Plan 1

£- £17,000,000 £- £- Southall 2021-2026

LBE/ Energy Services

Company (ESCO's)

Costs are network costs for 10.2km.

Energy, utilities and

Physical Infrastructure

Y Southall Decentralised

Heating Network- Core as shown in Plan

£- £5,700,000 £- £- Southall 2021-2026

LBE/ Energy Services

Company (ESCO's)

£5.7M (network costs for approx. 2.28km)

Health Y PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRES TBC TBC TBC TBC

Health Y Southall Gasworks TBC TBC TBC TBC

LIFT Company –

Building Better Health

(West London) Ltd.

Southall NHS Ealing

LIFT Company – Building Better Health (West London) Ltd.

Health Y Refurbishment or other

solution for Mattock Lane Health Centre

TBC TBC TBC TBC

LIFT Company –

Building Better Health

(West London) Ltd.

Ealing 2010-2015 NHS Ealing

LIFT Company – Building Better Health (West London) Ltd.

Health Y Westway Cross - Health /

leisure centre or Greenford Square

TBC TBC TBC TBC

LIFT Company –

Building Better Health

(West London) ltd.

GNP 2010-2015 NHS Ealing

LIFT Company – Building Better Health (West London) ltd.

Health Y Acton Integrated health social care facility TBC TBC TBC TBC

LIFT Company –

Building Better Health

(West London) ltd.

Acton 2010-2015 NHS Ealing

LIFT Company – Building Better Health (West London) ltd.

Health Y

MENTAL HEALTH Mens medium secure unit.

Trust Resource Centre, office, and admin accommodation.

TBC TBC TBC TBC Ealing WLMHT

Children & Families Y Children's homes capital

works £334,000 £334,000 £- Mainstream

Funding £334,000.00 Borough-

wide 2013-2026

Ealing Council

Capital Programme

Emergency Services Y

POLICE Additional neighbourhood

police bases may be needed as part of major

developments. Additional office space may be required

at a future date. May also require new centralised police patrol base and

custody centre.

TBC TBC TBC TBC TBC Metropolitan

Police

MPA Estate Strategy and

Asset Management

Plan

Page 22: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

21

Project Information Cost & Funding Location Timing Delivery

Infrastructure Category Programme CIL

Eligible Project Description Estimated

Total Cost (to 2016/17)

Estimated Total Cost over Plan

Period 2014-26

Estimated Total

Funding (to 2016/17)

Estimated Total

Funding over Plan

Period 2014-26

Funding Source Funding Gap (to 2016/17)

Potential Funding Source

Area Overview Who? Risks / contingency

How? (delivery mechanism /

funding sources)

Waste Y

WASTE Waste facilities as

determined through the West London Waste Plan

(WLWP).

TBC TBC TBC

Delivered by waste

contractor TBC

Borough-wide

2013-2026

LB Ealing, LB Hillingdon,

LB Brent, LB Harrow, LB Hounslow,

LB Richmond

land will be safeguarded

as a contingency

against waste not

being dealt with through a contractor

WLWA to enter into a contract

with an approved partner to

provide waste processing contract.

Page 23: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

22

Appendix B_ Summary Tables

Infrastructure Category

Total no of

projects

% of total

No of CIL eligible projects

No of costed eligible projects over plan period

2014- 26

Total Cost of Infrastructure

over plan period 2014-

26

% of total over plan

period 2014- 26

Total No of projects 2014/15-

16/17

Total No of eligible

projects to 2016/17

No of costed eligible

projects to 16/17

Total Cost of Infrastructure

to 16/17

% of total to 16/17

Adult Services 3 4% 3 0 TBC 0% 3 3 0 TBC 0% Children & Families 1 1% 1 1 £334,000 0% 1 1 1 £334,000 0%

Community and Leisure 18 23% 17 15

£138,209,955 22% 15 15 14 £110,709,955 26%

Education 5 6% 5 3

£344,334,000 56% 4 4 3 £223,434,000 52% Emergency

Services 1 1% 1 0 TBC 0% 1 1 0 TBC 0% Employment

and Skills 1 1% 1 1 £1,500,000 0% 1 1 1 £1,500,000 0% Energy, utilities

and Physical Infrastructure 7 9% 7 4 £26,950,000 4% 3 3 1 £250,000 0%

Green Infrastructure 13 17% 12 11 £9,962,000 2% 11 10 11 £9,962,000 2%

Health 6 8% 6 0 TBC 0% 6 6 0 TBC 0% Regeneration 8 10% 8 8 £17,167,000 3% 8 8 8 £17,167,000 4%

Transport 14 18% 14 13 £79,907,500 13% 13 13 12 £69,907,500 16% Waste 1 1% 1 0 TBC 0% 1 1 0 TBC 0%

Total 78 100% 76 56

£618,364,455 100% 67 66 51 £433,264,455 100% Number of categories 12

Infrastructure Category

Total no of

projects

% of total

No of eligible projects

No of costed eligible projects over plan period

2010- 31

Total Cost of Infrastructure

over plan period 2010-

31

% of total over plan period 2010- 31

Total No of projects 2010/11- 16/17

Total No of eligible projects 2010/11- 16/17

No of costed eligible projects 2010/11- 16/17

Total Cost of Infrastructure 2010/11- 16/17

Page 24: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

23

Funding Total % of total Comments

Grant/ Mainstream Funding £2,200,000 1.0% Figure is a combination of Surestart / Capital Programme/ Grant/Mainstream funding

Grant £- 0.0% Figure is a combination of LIP/ Grant/Mainstream funding

Mainstream Funding £19,696,000 8.6% Figure is a combination of Major Projects/Property Strategy/Community Centres Strategy/ LBE Groundwork/Capital Programme/HLF/ Arts Council/EC/ English Heritage

Grant/ Mainstream Funding/ Partnership/ S106/ borrowing £127,434,000 55.5% Figure,( concerning the funding for the expansion of primary schools/ FE), is a combination of Capital Programme, DfE

funding, planning obligations and other grants

S106 £- Project Funding form Revenue £80,382,000 35.0% Total Cost of Infrastructure 2014/15- 2016/17 £433,264,455 Total funding 2014/15- 2016/17 £229,712,000

Aggregate Funding Gap 2014/15-2016/17 £203,552,455

Projected CIL Income 2014/15- 2016/17 £8,870,780

Residual Funding Gap 2014/15- 2016/17 £194,681,675

Page 25: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

Appendix C_ Summary Charts

Page 26: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

25

Appendix D_ CIL Income Projection

CHARGING AREA

CIL RATES £/sqm

HOUSING

RETAIL (parks/

superstores/ warehouses)

ALL OTHER RETAIL

STUDENT HOUSING HOTELS

1 £100 £100 £30 £100 £100 1: EALING

2 £50 £100 £30 £50 £50 2: REST OF THE BOROUGH

By Area PROJECTED CIL INCOME 2014-2016

TOTAL HOUSING LARGE

RETAIL ALL OTHER

RETAIL STUDENT HOUSING HOTELS

1 £2,451,960 £- £340,800 £tbc £tbc £2,792,760

2 £5,055,820 £309,400 £712,800 £tbc £tbc £6,078,020

Totals £7,507,780 £309,400 £1,053,600 £tbc £tbc £8,870,780 Annual Income £1,876,945 £77,350 £263,400 £tbc £tbc £2,217,695

By Area PROJECTED CIL INCOME 2017-2022

TOTAL HOUSING LARGE

RETAIL ALL OTHER

RETAIL STUDENT HOUSING HOTELS

1 £4,512,900 £- £732,000 £tbc £tbc £5,244,900

2 £5,081,300 £140,000 £459,000 £tbc £tbc £5,680,300

Totals £9,594,200 £140,000 £1,191,000 £tbc £tbc £10,925,200

Annual Income £1,918,840 £28,000 £238,200 £tbc £tbc £2,185,040

By Area PROJECTED CIL INCOME 2023-2027

TOTAL HOUSING LARGE

RETAIL ALL OTHER

RETAIL STUDENT HOUSING HOTELS

1 £3,075,730 £- £975,000 £tbc £tbc £4,050,730

2 £5,799,885 £588,000 £1,446,000 £tbc £tbc £7,833,885

Totals £8,875,615 £588,000 £2,421,000 £tbc £tbc £11,884,615 Annual Income £1,775,123 £117,600 £484,200 £tbc £tbc £2,376,923

By Area PROJECTED CIL INCOME 2014-2027

TOTAL HOUSING LARGE

RETAIL ALL OTHER

RETAIL STUDENT HOUSING HOTELS

Totals £25,977,595 £1,037,400 £4,665,600 £tbc £tbc £31,680,595

% 82 3 15 100

Page 27: Infrastructure Planning & Funding Gap Report February 2014 · an infrastructure funding gap, how big that gap is and how much of that gap the Council aims to fill using CIL. 1.4 CIL

26

Appendix E_ Initial Draft Regulation 123 Infrastructure List

Initial Draft Infrastructure List

The list below sets out those types of infrastructure projects that Ealing Council intends will be, or may be, wholly funded or funded in part by CIL. In setting this list Ealing Council will not normally seek planning obligations for infrastructure or types of infrastructure, included in the list.

• The provision, improvement, replacement, operation or maintenance of new and existing public education facilities

• The provision, improvement, replacement, operation or maintenance of new and existing transport facilities except site specific matters needed to make the development acceptable in planning terms. Site-specific matters may include (but are not limited to) highways crossovers to access the site and local road junctions, deceleration and turning lanes, measures to facilitate pedestrian and cyclist access, lighting and street furniture needed to mitigate the impact of a particular development. They may include mitigation works remote from the development site where the need for such works is identified in a Transport Assessment.

• The provision, improvement, replacement, operation or maintenance of new and existing employment and training facilities and programmes.

• The provision, improvement, replacement, operation or maintenance of new and existing health facilities.

• The provision, improvement, replacement, operation or maintenance of new and existing sports and leisure facilities

• The provision, improvement, replacement, operation or maintenance of new and existing libraries, cultural centres and community facilities

• The provision, improvement, replacement, operation or maintenance of existing open space

Please note that following consultation the Council expects this infrastructure list to contain specific projects.