initial monitoring results and...
TRANSCRIPT
Initial Monitoring Results
and Performance
Presentation Date:
February 11, 2015
• County of Cochise, AZ
• The Nature Conservancy
• JE Fuller/Hydrology &
Geomorphology, Inc.
• GeoSystems Analysis, Inc.
• Project Background
• Construction Summary
• Monitoring Equipment Installation
• Monitoring Period
Data presented today represents the initial results of monitoring the
system for a brief period of time. As this is a pilot project, long-
term results and conclusions will be used to inform future projects,
and guide improved analyses and design practices.
• Palominas,
Cochise County, Arizona
• Approximately 15 miles
South-Southeast of Sierra
Vista
• Rural setting
• Property often referred to
as the Mansker Tract
In-Channel
Basins Palominas
School
Detention
Basin
Stockpile
Box Culvert
Detention
Basin
Primary
Outlet
Overflow
Weir
6-Inch Weep Holes (3)
@ Stage=0.0’
Grate Inlet
@ Stage=3.0’
3-3.0’ Diameter
Corrugated Metal Pipes
265’ Crest Length
@ Stage=6.5’-7.0’
In-Channel
Basins (13) Weir Walls
(16)
Drywells
(6) Gravel Infiltration
Trenches (3)
Basins and Weir Walls
Single-Cell Shown
Dual-Cell Also Installed
• Monitoring Program Objectives
• Determine Volume of Stormwater Captured
• Determine Volume of Water Infiltrated
• Estimate Recharge
• Equipment Installed
• Precipitation Gages
• Stilling Wells in basins, drywells and infiltration trenches
• Groundwater monitoring to determine GW elevations
• Soil moisture monitoring to determine soil-water dynamics
• Monitoring Period
• July 2014 to present
• Data Presented Today for July 2014 through mid-November, 2014
0.0
1.5
3.0
4.5
6.0
7.5
9.0
10.5
12.0
13.5
15.0
16.5
18.0
0.0
0.3
0.5
0.8
1.0
1.3
1.5
1.8
2.0
2.3
2.5
2.8
3.0
Ave
rag
e C
um
ula
tive
Pre
cip
ita
tio
n (in
)
Av
era
ge
Da
ily P
rec
ipit
ati
on
(in
)
Date
Average Daily Precipitation Average Cumulative Precipitation
Odile
• Average summer
precipitation (9.98
inch) until Odile
• Odile and
subsequent frontal
storms = 7.03 inch
• Wet year!
Monitoring
LocationYear
Average
Precipitation
(in)
Seasonal
Rainfall
Classification
Palominas
Watershed2014 17.01 Wet
1955 - 2011 9.99 Avg
1964 (max) 19.08 Wet
1962 (min) 2.81 Dry
Stdev 3.53 --
9.99 Avg
13.52 Wet
6.46 Dry
Historical
Seasonal Rainfall
Classification
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Wa
ter
He
igh
t (f
t)
Date
Detention Basin SW-1 SW-2
SW-3 Weir 1 Crest Weir 2 Crest
Weir 3 Crest Detention Basin Sump Crest
Odile
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Wa
ter
He
igh
t (f
t)
Date
SW-4 SW-5 SW-6 Weir 4 Crest Weir 5 Crest Weir 6 Crest
Odile
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Wa
ter
He
igh
t (f
t)
Date
SW-7 SW-8 SW-9 Weir 7 Crest Weir 8 Crest Weir 9 Crest
Odile
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Wa
ter
He
igh
t (f
t)
Date
SW-10 SW-11 SW-12 SW-13
Weir 10 Crest Weir 11 Crest Weir 12 Crest Weir 13 Crest
Odile
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
De
pth
to
Gro
un
dw
ate
r (f
t)
Date
Baseline Well East Well Central Well West Well
Odile
Corrected
Weephole
Outflow (AF)
V-notch
Overflow
(AF)
Weir Wall
Overflow
(AF)
Total
Outflow
(AF)
Total ET +
Infiltration
(AF)
Detention Basin 36.48 N/A NA 36.48 NA
Basin 1 13.78 1.80 5.43 21.01 15.48
Basin 2 9.41 1.13 4.40 14.94 6.07
Basin 3 9.45 1.14 2.34 12.93 2.01
Basin 4 3.21 0.43 0.39 4.03 8.90
Basin 5 2.56 0.16 0.00 2.72 1.31
Basin 6 2.41 0.24 0.00 2.65 0.07
Basin 7 0.00 0.67 0.47 1.14 1.51
Basin 8 1.06 0.00 0.00 1.06 0.07
Basin 9 1.14 0.00 0.00 1.14 -0.07
Basin 10 1.09 0.00 0.00 1.09 0.04
Basin 11 0.00 N/A 0.39 0.39 0.70
Basin 12 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.13
Basin 13 0.00 N/A 0.00 0.00 0.26
Basin
Monitoring Season (7/23/14 - 11/18/14)
• Average summer and late frontal storms = Wet Summer season
• Stormwater runoff was less than modeled:
• Lower intensity storms
• More upland and channel infiltration?
• System captured and recharged water:
• Detention Basin did not overflow primary outlet structure
• Upstream In-Channel Basins captured the majority of the flow
• All stormwater delivered to the system was captured
• Estimated capture of 36 acre-feet during the monitoring period
• Infiltration trenches and drywells filled and drained rapidly
• 5-7 years of continued monitoring are recommended to capture variability in precipitation:
• Additional data will improve understanding of:
• Rainfall/Runoff relationships
• Efficiency of basins, drywells and infiltration basins
• Groundwater response
• Funding Source Unknown
• Ballpark annual inspection & monitoring costs will be around $55K
• Potential cost savings if
County performs some tasks