initial monitoring results and...

30
Initial Monitoring Results and Performance Presentation Date: February 11, 2015

Upload: others

Post on 04-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

Initial Monitoring Results

and Performance

Presentation Date:

February 11, 2015

Page 2: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

• County of Cochise, AZ

• The Nature Conservancy

• JE Fuller/Hydrology &

Geomorphology, Inc.

• GeoSystems Analysis, Inc.

Page 3: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

• Project Background

• Construction Summary

• Monitoring Equipment Installation

• Monitoring Period

Data presented today represents the initial results of monitoring the

system for a brief period of time. As this is a pilot project, long-

term results and conclusions will be used to inform future projects,

and guide improved analyses and design practices.

Page 4: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation
Page 5: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

• Palominas,

Cochise County, Arizona

• Approximately 15 miles

South-Southeast of Sierra

Vista

• Rural setting

• Property often referred to

as the Mansker Tract

Page 6: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

In-Channel

Basins Palominas

School

Detention

Basin

Stockpile

Box Culvert

Page 7: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

Detention

Basin

Primary

Outlet

Overflow

Weir

Page 8: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

6-Inch Weep Holes (3)

@ Stage=0.0’

Grate Inlet

@ Stage=3.0’

Page 9: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

3-3.0’ Diameter

Corrugated Metal Pipes

Page 10: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

265’ Crest Length

@ Stage=6.5’-7.0’

Page 11: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

In-Channel

Basins (13) Weir Walls

(16)

Drywells

(6) Gravel Infiltration

Trenches (3)

Page 12: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

Basins and Weir Walls

Page 13: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

Single-Cell Shown

Dual-Cell Also Installed

Page 14: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation
Page 15: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation
Page 16: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

• Monitoring Program Objectives

• Determine Volume of Stormwater Captured

• Determine Volume of Water Infiltrated

• Estimate Recharge

• Equipment Installed

• Precipitation Gages

• Stilling Wells in basins, drywells and infiltration trenches

• Groundwater monitoring to determine GW elevations

• Soil moisture monitoring to determine soil-water dynamics

• Monitoring Period

• July 2014 to present

• Data Presented Today for July 2014 through mid-November, 2014

Page 17: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation
Page 18: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation
Page 19: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

0.0

1.5

3.0

4.5

6.0

7.5

9.0

10.5

12.0

13.5

15.0

16.5

18.0

0.0

0.3

0.5

0.8

1.0

1.3

1.5

1.8

2.0

2.3

2.5

2.8

3.0

Ave

rag

e C

um

ula

tive

Pre

cip

ita

tio

n (in

)

Av

era

ge

Da

ily P

rec

ipit

ati

on

(in

)

Date

Average Daily Precipitation Average Cumulative Precipitation

Odile

Page 20: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

• Average summer

precipitation (9.98

inch) until Odile

• Odile and

subsequent frontal

storms = 7.03 inch

• Wet year!

Monitoring

LocationYear

Average

Precipitation

(in)

Seasonal

Rainfall

Classification

Palominas

Watershed2014 17.01 Wet

1955 - 2011 9.99 Avg

1964 (max) 19.08 Wet

1962 (min) 2.81 Dry

Stdev 3.53 --

9.99 Avg

13.52 Wet

6.46 Dry

Historical

Seasonal Rainfall

Classification

Page 21: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

Wa

ter

He

igh

t (f

t)

Date

Detention Basin SW-1 SW-2

SW-3 Weir 1 Crest Weir 2 Crest

Weir 3 Crest Detention Basin Sump Crest

Odile

Page 22: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

Wa

ter

He

igh

t (f

t)

Date

SW-4 SW-5 SW-6 Weir 4 Crest Weir 5 Crest Weir 6 Crest

Odile

Page 23: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Wa

ter

He

igh

t (f

t)

Date

SW-7 SW-8 SW-9 Weir 7 Crest Weir 8 Crest Weir 9 Crest

Odile

Page 24: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Wa

ter

He

igh

t (f

t)

Date

SW-10 SW-11 SW-12 SW-13

Weir 10 Crest Weir 11 Crest Weir 12 Crest Weir 13 Crest

Odile

Page 25: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

De

pth

to

Gro

un

dw

ate

r (f

t)

Date

Baseline Well East Well Central Well West Well

Odile

Page 26: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

Corrected

Weephole

Outflow (AF)

V-notch

Overflow

(AF)

Weir Wall

Overflow

(AF)

Total

Outflow

(AF)

Total ET +

Infiltration

(AF)

Detention Basin 36.48 N/A NA 36.48 NA

Basin 1 13.78 1.80 5.43 21.01 15.48

Basin 2 9.41 1.13 4.40 14.94 6.07

Basin 3 9.45 1.14 2.34 12.93 2.01

Basin 4 3.21 0.43 0.39 4.03 8.90

Basin 5 2.56 0.16 0.00 2.72 1.31

Basin 6 2.41 0.24 0.00 2.65 0.07

Basin 7 0.00 0.67 0.47 1.14 1.51

Basin 8 1.06 0.00 0.00 1.06 0.07

Basin 9 1.14 0.00 0.00 1.14 -0.07

Basin 10 1.09 0.00 0.00 1.09 0.04

Basin 11 0.00 N/A 0.39 0.39 0.70

Basin 12 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.13

Basin 13 0.00 N/A 0.00 0.00 0.26

Basin

Monitoring Season (7/23/14 - 11/18/14)

Page 27: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

• Average summer and late frontal storms = Wet Summer season

• Stormwater runoff was less than modeled:

• Lower intensity storms

• More upland and channel infiltration?

• System captured and recharged water:

• Detention Basin did not overflow primary outlet structure

• Upstream In-Channel Basins captured the majority of the flow

• All stormwater delivered to the system was captured

• Estimated capture of 36 acre-feet during the monitoring period

• Infiltration trenches and drywells filled and drained rapidly

Page 28: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation
Page 29: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation

• 5-7 years of continued monitoring are recommended to capture variability in precipitation:

• Additional data will improve understanding of:

• Rainfall/Runoff relationships

• Efficiency of basins, drywells and infiltration basins

• Groundwater response

• Funding Source Unknown

• Ballpark annual inspection & monitoring costs will be around $55K

• Potential cost savings if

County performs some tasks

Page 30: Initial Monitoring Results and Performanceuppersanpedropartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/...•Project Background •Construction Summary •Monitoring Equipment Installation