inman square intersection improvements project/media/files/publicworks... · 2020-02-07 · bicycle...
TRANSCRIPT
INMAN SQUARE INTERSECTIONIMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
Community Meeting #2 | May 2, 2017
INMAN SQ PROJECT
Agenda
ProjectBackground
PreferredConcept
Next StepsAlternativesEvaluation
Project Background
Project Timeline
Describe existingcondition constraints
InitialTransportationStudySummer 2015
June 2016Presentation toCommunity, initialfindings ofTransportation Study
Cyclist FatalityJune 2016
Inman IntersectionProject KickoffOctober 2016
EnhancedpavementmarkingsinstalledAugust 2016
No Left TurnsImplementedNovember 2016
BCU/KittlesonCharrette forroundabout designDecember 2016
Community Meeting #1aJanuary 24, 2017;#1b February 7, 2017
Conceptual DesignOverviewMay 2, 2017
MassDOT WalkAnd BikeAssessmentFall 2014
Project Background
Initial Transportation Study
• Complaints of high delay for all modes oftransportation
o Long signal cycle lengthso High volumes of bicyclists
• Existing operational deficiencieso Layout of crosswalks irregularo Large intersection for bicyclists and
vehicles to traverse
• Review of Crash Data 2008-2012o 69 total crashes in 5 years (exceeds
MassDOT avg Statewide crash rate)o Most frequent type of crash type –
angle crasho 15 bicycle involved crashes, 5
pedestrian involved crashes
Project Background
Existing Conditions1. Crosswalks outside of
desire lines and some notsignal controlled
2. Existing geometry resultsin long distance forpedestrians and bikes totravel
3. No signal control forHampshire StreetSouthbound turn toAntrim Street
4. Issues with clearancetime for all users
5. Unclear lane control onCambridge Street
• Reduce unnecessaryvehicular delay
• Provide clear guidanceand lane controls
• Increase efficiencythrough more compactintersection design
Alternatives Evaluation
Desired Outcomes
• Reduce exposurethrough morecompact intersectiondesign
• Minimize conflictswith turning vehicles
• Provide separation
• Reduce length ofcrosswalks and signalwait times
• Provide more directcrosswalk routing
• Provide improvedpedestrianenvironment throughlandscaping andenhanced amenities
• Reduce bus/transitdelay
• Improve location ofand access to MBTAbus stops
• Provide pedestrianplaza adjacent tobusinesses
Desired Outcomes (continued)Alternatives Evaluation
• Maintain truck accessthrough intersection
• Maintain protectedfirehouse egress/access
Preliminary ConceptsAlternatives Evaluation
Community FeedbackFEEDBACK RESULTS FEEDBACK HIGHLIGHTS
• Maintain Springfield St as 2-way
• Consider traffic impacts to Fayette Stand Antrim St
• Desire for crosswalk at heart ofintersection
• Desire for new pedestrian open space
• Consideration for fire station and truckaccess
• Support for separated bike lanefacilities but also concerns for parking
• Positive feedback on floating bus stops
60% signalized concept
Alternatives Evaluation
Other Stakeholder Feedback
Inman Square NeighborhoodAssociation• Preferred Bend Northside• Desired open space adjacent to
retail
Cambridge Fire Department• Requested signalized
intersection
Joint Bike/Ped/Transit Committee• Preferred Bend Northside• Support for plaza space adjacent to
businesses• Concerned with lack of signalized
crossings in Roundabout option
MBTA• No preferred concept• In favor of transit priority• MBTA willing to consider Bus Route
91 relocation to Prospect Street
Alternatives Evaluation
City of Somerville• No preferred concept• Maintain 2-way Springfield St
Boston Cyclists Union/CambridgeBicycle Safety• Preferred Roundabout
Roundabout
Signalized Concept
Design Option PerspectivesExisting conditions
Alternatives Evaluation
Design Option Perspectives
Signalized Roundabout
Alternatives Evaluation
Design Option PerspectivesAlternatives Evaluation
RoundaboutSignalized
Evaluation ConsiderationsAlternatives Evaluation
• Improve operations, safety, and comfort for allmodes of transportation
• Accommodate fire station access withadequate signal clearance
• Assign clear right-of-way for pedestrians,bicyclists, and motorists at crossings
• Address pedestrian and bicycle desire lines
• Accommodate all necessary truck movements
• Create usable open space and placemakingopportunities
• Minimize changes to side street directions
Evaluation ConsiderationsAlternatives Evaluation
Truck turning
WB-50 vehicle (large truck) turning paths
Evaluation ConsiderationsAlternatives Evaluation
Bus turning
MBTA Bus turning paths
Evaluation ConsiderationsAlternatives Evaluation
Pedestrian-oriented open space analysis
Signalized Concept: 7,100 SFRoundabout: 5,000 SF
PREFERRED CONCEPT
Design Highlights
Create new VellucciPlaza adjacent to retail
Maintain drivewayaccess to businesses
1 2
1. Separated bike lanethrough existingVellucci Plaza
Maintain large calipertrees
Maintain and/or expandHubway station
2.
PREFERRED CONCEPT
Design Highlights
Reverse direction ofAntrim Street3
4
3. Balance betweenparking and transit
Transit priorityopportunity
4.
Vehicle turn lanes toallow for protectedpedestrian crossings
Potential to improvemorning peak hourservice on MBTA BusRoute 91
5.
5
PREFERRED CONCEPT
Design Highlights
Maintain two-waydirection on SpringfieldStreet
Relocate MBTA BusRoute 91 to ProspectStreet
6
6. Pedestrian crossing atheart of intersection
Signalized access tofire house maintained
7.
7
PREFERRED CONCEPT
Signalized Concept– Signal Phasing
PREFERRED CONCEPT
Transit Benefits
• Buses stop in travel lane, minimizing bus delay and improving accessibility• Additional space for amenities such as bus shelters• Bikes separated from bus conflicts
Floating bus stops
PREFERRED CONCEPT
Transit Benefits
• Lane for buses to pull out ahead of traffic• Most effective in morning peak
Transit priority on Cambridge Street (eastbound)
PREFERRED CONCEPT
Transit BenefitsMBTA bus routes
• Improved stops forRoutes 69 and 83
• Route 91 to ProspectStreeto .15 mile relocationo Low ridership on
Springfield Streeto More direct routing
and faster run times,particularly withUnion Squarechanges
PREFERRED CONCEPT
Parking Considerations
PREFERRED CONCEPT
Parking ConsiderationsParking retention
• 61 on-street spaces total
• About 50% of on-streetspaces retained
o 49% parking retainedwith transit priority(during AM peakperiod)
o 54% parking retainedwithout transitpriority/non-peakperiod Note: The number of spaces in Lot 14 off Springfield Street, and resident permit on-street
parking, are not included in the parking inventory analysis/percent retained calculations.
PREFERRED CONCEPT
Truck Access
• Fire truck access into and out of fire housefor all approaches
• WB-62 turn at Hampshire St. and CambridgeSt. intersection
Accommodate truck movements
PREFERRED CONCEPT
Pedestrian/Bike Considerations
Protected intersections Separated bike lanes Raised crosswalks
Signalized bike crossings Two stage queue boxes Colored pavement markings
PREFERRED CONCEPT
Open Space Considerations
1
2 3
4
PREFERRED CONCEPT
Open Space ConsiderationsExamples
Usable Open Space with Tree CanopyYorkville Park, Toronto, ON
Flexible Open Space Next to StorefrontsSquare Dancing in Lafayette Sq., Cambridge
1 2
PREFERRED CONCEPT
Open Space ConsiderationsExamples
Memorable Site ElementsMassArt Residence Hall, Boston
Expanded Plaza Space / Distinctive GroundNew Road, Brighton, UK
3 4
NEXT STEPS
Next Steps
CommunityMeeting #3Summer 2017
CompleteFinal DesignSummer 2017
Construction StartFall 2017
CommunityMeeting #4Fall 2017
Complete 25%Conceptual DesignSpring 2017
COMMENTS & QUESTIONS
CONTACT INFORMATION:
Kelly Dunn, Community Relations [email protected]
www. cambridgema.gov/theworks/inmansquare
Preliminary Concepts
Q&A Material
DESIGN OPTIONS
Toolbox Design ElementsVehicle Types
WB-62
WB-50
SU-30
DESIGN OPTIONS
Toolbox Design ElementsBike Lanes
DESIGN OPTIONS
Toolbox Design ElementsOpen Space/Pedestrian
DESIGN OPTIONS
Toolbox Design ElementsBus Stops
DESIGN OPTIONS
Toolbox Design ElementsPrepared by McMahon Associates
Bicycle lane transitions down, sidewalk stays upBicycle transition down towards roadway level. A cross slope on the bike lane allows a short curb reveal which creates a smallpedestrian ramp. Pedestrians wait on sidewalk behind the bike lane.
Raised CrossingRoadway comes up to bike lane and sidewalk level. Noneed for bicycle or pedestrian ramps.
Protected Corner IslandsBicycle lane is at roadway level. Pedestrian ramp is on sidewalk.Pedestrians cross bike lane and wait within protected corner island.
Cambridge, MAWestern Ave Boston, MAStaniford Street
Cambridge, MAWestern AveBoston, MAStaniford Street
Ramp Designs
DESIGN OPTIONS
Toolbox Design ElementsBicycle Ramp: Roadway Level to Sidewalk LevelThe bike lane transitions to sidewalk level without a horizontal transition.
Vassar Street
Davis, CA
Shared Bike/Ped Crossing at Protected IntersectionBicycle and pedestrian areas are combined and lowered to create oneshort ramp. The ped/bike areas are delineated with colors.
Davis, CA
Bicycle Ramp: Sidewalk Level to Roadway LevelThe bike lane transitions from sidewalk level to roadway level before ahorizontal transition.
Vassar Street
Bicycle Ramp: Sidewalk Level to Roadway LevelTransitions both vertically and horizontally from sidewalk level toroadway level. Uses a “Bend-Out” intersection treatment.
Missoula, MT
Prepared by McMahon AssociatesRamp Designs
Roundabout