innovations in cardiovascular disease management

183
HEALTHCARE Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management Latest surgical procedures, drugs and medical devices By Melissa Zebrowski

Upload: gopal-kumar-das

Post on 29-Apr-2017

228 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

H E A L T H C A R E

Innovations in Cardiovascular DiseaseManagementLatest surgical procedures, drugs and medical devices

By Melissa Zebrowski

Page 2: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

ii

Paul Taylor

Paul Taylor is an independent market analyst for the medical industry with a BSc and

PhD in Biochemistry from the University of Liverpool and an MBA from Oxford

Brookes University. Dr Taylor has worked in the medical industry as a senior

marketing executive for 20 years creating and implementing strategic business and

marketing plans for major multinational medical device companies before establishing

himself as an independent research analyst.

For the last 10 years Dr Taylor has focused on the structure, organisation and

functioning of the European health care systems with particular interest on

reimbursement systems, analysing specific European product market segments and

advising/preparing strategic business and marketing plans for international

pharmaceutical, medical devices and healthcare technology companies.

Copyright © 2007 Business Insights Ltd This Management Report is published by Business Insights Ltd. All rights reserved. Reproduction or redistribution of this Management Report in any form for any purpose is expressly prohibited without the prior consent of Business Insights Ltd. The views expressed in this Management Report are those of the publisher, not of Business Insights. Business Insights Ltd accepts no liability for the accuracy or completeness of the information, advice or comment contained in this Management Report nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. While information, advice or comment is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no responsibility can be accepted by Business Insights Ltd for its completeness or accuracy.

Page 3: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

iii

Table of Contents

Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

Executive Summary 10

The Management of Cardiovascular Disease 10 Cardiovascular and Interventional Procedures 11 Emerging Coronary Stents and Stent Systems 12 Innovations in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery 13 Cardiovascular Drugs in Early Stage Development 14 New and Emerging Cardiovascular Drugs 14

Chapter 1 The Management of Cardiovascular Disease 18

Summary 18 Introduction 19 The Global Burden of Cardiovascular Disease 19 CVD remains the leading cause of death in the United States 19 CVD Rates in Central and Eastern Europe 21 Noncommunicable Diseases in the Developing World 21 Background to the Major Cardiovascular Conditions 23 Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) 23 Atherosclerosis 23 Angina Pectoris 25 Acute Myocardial Infarction (MI) 27 Heart Valve Disorders 29 Aortic heart valve 29 Mitral Valve Disease 30 Pulmonary Valve Disease 32 Tricuspid Valve Disease 32 High Blood Pressure: Hypertension 32 Heart Rhythm Disorders (Heart Arrhythmia) 33

Page 4: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

iv

Peripheral Vascular Disease 35 Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) 35 Peripheral Venous Disorders (PVD) 37 Stroke or Cerebrovascular Accidents (CVA) 38 Ischaemic Stroke 38 Haemorrhagic stroke 38

Chapter 2 Latest Developments in Cardiovascular and PCI Procedures 42

Summary 42 Introduction to Percutaneous Coronary Interventions 43 Indications for PCI 44 PCI Procedural Volumes 44 PCI Used Primarily to Treat Unstable Angina and acute ST-elevation MI 45 Inter-country Variance in PCI Procedural Rates 46 China and India: Huge growth potential and market development 47 Latest Developments in PCI Procedures 49 Embolic Protection Devices 49 Current Products 50 Development Stage Products and Current Status 55 Future Technologies and Trends 58 Coronary Atherectomy 59 Rotational Coronary Atherectomy (Rotoblation) 59 Directional Coronary Atherectomy (DCA) 59 Orbital Atherectomy 60 Ablative laser-assisted angioplasty 60

Chapter 3 Emerging Coronary Stents and Stent Systems 64

Summary 64 Emerging Coronary Stents and Stent Systems 65 Key Events 65 Introduction of Drug-Eluting Stents (DES) 67 Development of Drug-Eluting Stents 70 Sirolimus (Rapamycin) 70 Paclitaxel 71 Tacrolimus 72 Everolimus (RAD-001) 73 Zotarolimus (also called ABT-578) 73 DES – Recent News, Product Developments and Clinical Trial Updates 74

Page 5: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

v

Market Developments and Forecasts for Drug-Eluting Stents 77 Emergence of Bioabsorbable Stents 82 Biomaterials and Bioabsorbable Polymers 83 Further Coronary Stent Developments and Technological Trends 85 Novel Coating Technologies 85 Gene Therapy technologies and its Potential Use to Prevent Restenosis 86 Coronary Stents and Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPCs) 87 Nanotechnologies and Drug-Eluting Coronary Stents 88 Development of Novel Estradiol Containing Drug-Eluting Stents 88 Stem-Cell Derived Endovascular Cells 89

Chapter 4 Innovations in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (MICS) 92

Summary 92 Introduction 93 Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass (MID-CAB) 93 Indications for MIDCAB 94 Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass (OP-CAB) 94 Indications for OP-CAB 94 Minimally Invasive Port Access 95 Indications for Minimally Invasive Port Access 96 Robotic Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass (RA-CAB) 96 Current and Emerging Technologies 98 Robotics in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery 98 Robotic Systems 98 Computer Aided Cardiac Surgery 100 Virtual Reality in Cardiac Surgery 100 Laser Heart Surgery or transmyocardial Laser revascularization (TMLR) 101 The CO2 Heart Laser System 101 The holmium:YAG (yttrium aluminium garnet) laser 102 The excimer laser 102

Chapter 5 Cardiovascular Drugs in Early Stage Development 106

Summary 106 Introduction 107 Early Developments in Key Cardiovascular Disease Classes 107 Angina 107 Arrhythmiasis 110 Atherosclerosis 112 Atrial Fibrillation 115 Congestive Heart Failure 116

Page 6: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

vi

Hypercholesterolemia 118 Hypertension 120 Myocardial Infarction 122 Thrombosis 124

Chapter 6 New and Emerging Cardiovascular Drugs 128

Summary 128 Introduction 129 Anti-Hypertensives 129 Tekturna (Aliskiren) 130 Development of a New Class of Renin Inhibitors 132 Exforge (valsartan plus amlodipine) 133 CHF-1521 134 Cleviprex(TM) (Clevidipine) 135 Antihypertensives: Current Pipeline and Late Stage Development 136 Cardoxal (MC-4232) (MC-1 cardioprotectant plus lisinopril) 138 Darusentan 139 Ambrisentan 139 Nebivolol 140 Zanipress® / Zanitek® 140 Thelin™ (Sitaxsentan) 141 TBC3711 142 Anti-Dyslipidemics 143 Pfizer discontinues torcetrapib development 144 R1658 145 Simcor (Niaspan® (extended-release niacin) and simvastatin (generic Zocor®)) 145 CRESTOR® (rosuvastatin) and CRESTOR/ABT-335 combination 147 Synordia 149 Lapaquistat (TAK-475) 150 SLx-4090 151 AEGR-733 152 Compound Number 256073 and 501516 153 LBM642 153 Dyslipidaemia: Current Pipeline and Late Stage Development 154 Anti-Thrombotics 156 Rivaroxaban (BAY59-7939) 156 Rendix (dabigatran etexilate, BIBR-1048) 157 Idraparinux 157 Apixaban 158 SSR-126517 158 Exanta/ximelagatran 159 Anti-Thrombotics: Current Pipeline and Late Stage Development 160 Anti-Arrhythmics 161 Stedicor (Azimilide) 163

Page 7: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

vii

Multaq (Dronedarone) 164 Vernakalalant (RSD 1235) 165 Tecadenoson CVT510 167 Pulzium IV (Tedisamil) 167 Anti-Arrhythmics: Current Pipeline and Late Stage Development 168

Chapter 7 Appendix 170

Methodology Statement 170 Primary Data and Information Gathering 170 Secondary Data and Information Gathering 170 Market Share Analysis and Market Forecast Predictions 171 Glossary 173 Index 182

List of Figures Figure 1.1: Breakdown of Deaths from Cardiovascular Diseases, USA 2002 20 Figure 1.2: Leading causes of death in developing countries, 2002 23 Figure 2.3: Use of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Europe, 2005 46 Figure 3.4: Estimated number of Stent Procedures (BMS & DES) % Total Number of PTCA

Procedures 69 Figure 3.5: Actual and projected revenues from Coronary Stents, Worldwide sales- 2006 81 Figure 3.6: Market Share Analysis, DES v BMS World, 2006 82

List of Tables Table 1.1: Age- and gender-specific incidence of recognised MI 28 Table 1.2: Age- and gender-specific incidence of unrecognised MI 28 Table 2.3: Estimated volume of cardiovascular procedures by region (US 2002) 45 Table 2.4: PCI procedure rates in Selected Countries, 2005 49 Table 5.5: Selected Early Stage Anti Anginal Drug Developments 108 Table 5.6: Selected Early Stage Anti Arrhythmiasis Drug Developments 110 Table 5.7: Selected Early Stage Atherosclerosis Drug Developments 112 Table 5.8: Selected Early Stage Atrial Fibrillation Drug Developments 115 Table 5.9: Selected Early Stage Congestive Heart Failure Drug Developments 116 Table 5.10: Selected Early Stage Hypercholesterolemia Drug Developments 118 Table 5.11: Selected Early Stage Hypertension Drug Developments 120 Table 5.12: Selected Early Stage Myocardial Infarction Drug Developments 122 Table 5.13: Selected Early Stage Thrombosis Drug Developments 125 Table 6.14: Characteristics of Major Classes of Lipoproteins 144

Page 8: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

viii

Table 6.15: AstraZeneca’s Current Anti-Dyslipidaemia Pipeline 149 Table 6.16: Classification of Anti-Arrhythmics 162

Page 9: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

9

Executive Summary

Page 10: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

10

Executive Summary

The Management of Cardiovascular Disease

Cardiovascular disease is the term used for a variety of ailments including chronic heart

failure, atrial fibrillation, angina and peripheral arterial disease, amongst others. The

US has by far the highest prevalence of cardiovascular disease, with Japan and

Germany in second and third place respectively.

Despite a decline in CVD (cardiovascular disease) in the US it still remains the

leading cause of death and accounts for 53% of all deaths in the US.

Increased concern over the rising mortality rates in central and Eastern Europe

caused by CVD, where it is almost double that of the worst affected countries in the

European Union. Despite issues about the quality and accuracy of data, the country

causing most concern is the Russian Federation.

CVD are recognized to have a considerable economic impact on rapidly growing

markets in the developing world. Improved economic conditions are expected to

increase the high risk factors associated with CVD, like high blood pressure,

tobacco use, alcohol consumption, cholesterol, obesity and a sedentary lifestyle.

Syndromes that are associated with acute coronary syndromes are correlated with

age and the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. Unstable angina, which has

the highest incidence rate across the seven major pharmaceutical markets, is

estimated to be particularly prevalent in the UK and the US and low in Japan and

Italy.

Page 11: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

11

Cardiovascular and Interventional Procedures

Since the introduction of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCI) or

Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary (PTCA) the number of procedures carried out

has increased dramatically, becoming one of the most common medical

interventions performed and has transformed the practice of revascularization for

coronary disease.

42.6% of all percutaneous coronary interventions carried out in Europe in 2005

were used primarily to treat unstable angina. 20.2% of all percutaneous coronary

interventions were used to treat acute ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI).

PCI procedural rates differ greatly in different regions across the world. Germany

has the highest procedural rate in the world with an estimated 225,500 carried out

in 2005/2006 (2,765 pmp), compared to China with an estimated total of 95,912

PCI procedures (73 pmp) and India with an estimated total of 42,123 PCI

procedures (41 pmp).

Emerging technologies and recent product developments include embolic

protection devices incorporating distal filters such as the FilterWire EZ™ Embolic

Protection System developed by Boston Scientific, distal balloon occlusive devices

like TriActiv FX(R) Embolic Protection System from Kensey Nash and proximal

balloon occlusive devices such as the Parodi Anti-Emboli System (PAES)

developed by ArteriA Medical Science.

Other developments include the emergence of Rotational Coronary Atherectomy

(Rotoblation), Directional Coronary Atherectomy (DCA). Orbital Atherectomy and

Ablative laser-assisted angioplasty and innovative minimally invasive technologies

and techniques.

Page 12: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

12

Emerging Coronary Stents and Stent Systems

Drug-eluting stents have been regarded as a breakthrough technology and an

effective method of reducing restenosis. Since their introduction, they have had a

dramatic impact on the growth and development of coronary stents worldwide.

Current estimates show that 95.9% of all PCI procedures in 2006 included a

coronary stent of one sort or another (BMS or DES). The proportion of drug-eluting

stents had increased from 2.6% in 2002 to 68.9% in 2006.

Given current market conditions, it is anticipated that drug-eluting stents will be

used in nearly 80% of PCI procedures in Europe by 2012.

Currently, drug eluting stents incorporate Sirolimus (rapamycin), Paclitaxel,

Tacrolimus, Everolimus (RAD-001) and Zotarolimus (also called ABT-578).

The worldwide market for coronary stents was valued at $6.18 billion in 2006, with

a projected value of $13.34 billion by the year 2013 (CAGR 11.6%).

The worldwide market for drug-eluting stents has been valued at $5.14 billion in

2006, and is expected to increase to $12.40 billion by the year 2013 (CAGR

13.4%).

The world market for bare metal stents is currently valued at $1.04 billion but is

expected to decline in value to $0.94 billion by the end of the forecast period

(CAGR –1.4%).

There are now four major manufacturers of coronary stents. These are Cordis

(Johnson & Johnson), Boston Scientific Corporation, Medtronic and Abbott

Laboratories (Abbott Vascular). Cordis (Johnson & Johnson) and Boston Scientific

Corporation dominate the drug-eluting stent market.

There are concerns amongst clinicians about a number of problems or

complications associated with drug-eluting stents. These complications are

primarily concerned with late developing stent thrombosis, allergic inflammatory

reactions, long term antiplatelet therapy and non-compliance.

Page 13: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

13

One of the attractive materials recognized as having the potential for use in

bioabsorbable stents is the polymer called poly L-lactic acid (PLLA). Several stent

designs have been built using PLLA mono filaments and appear to be a viable

alternative to metal in some preliminary studies.

Other novel technological developments include Absorbable Metal Stent (AMS)

Technologies, the development of novel coating technologies, gene therapy

technologies and its potential use to prevent restenosis, coronary stents and

Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPCs), nanotechnologies and drug-eluting coronary

stents, development of novel Estradiol containing drug-eluting stents, development

of regenerative stents using stem-cell derived endovascular cells.

Innovations in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

New and innovative, minimally invasive surgical technologies are poised to replace

the traditional, highly invasive protocols used in open-heart surgery.

Currently, there are three types of procedural approaches. These are Minimally

Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass (MID-CAB) surgery, Off-Pump Coronary

Artery Bypass (OP-CAB), and Port Access Surgery.

Minimally Invasive Port Access Surgery is indicated for Multi-Vessel Coronary

Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG), Mitral Valve Repair or Replacement (MVR),

MVR/Tricuspid Repair, MVR Redo, MVR/CABG, Aortic Valve Replacement

(AVR) and Congenital Heart Defect Surgery, including Atrial Septal Defect (ASD)

& Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD).

Beating heart OP-CAB is currently recognized as a technique significantly reducing

the mortality and morbidity associated with the use of traditional cardiopulmonary

bypass procedures. This procedure is indicated for multivessel disease requiring

revascularization and where normal cardiopulmonary bypass is contraindicated.

Page 14: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

14

Robotic Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass (RA-CAB) systems such as The

Automated Endoscopic System for Optimal Positioning (AESOP), The Da Vinci

System and The Zeus Robotic System are becoming increasingly popular.

Computer aided cardiac surgery including virtual reality in cardiac surgery,

TransMyocardial Laser Revascularization (TMLR) including CO2 heart laser

systems, holmium:YAG (yttrium aluminium garnet) lasers and the excimer lasers

are changing the face of cardiac surgery.

Cardiovascular Drugs in Early Stage Development

There are a total of 126 new chemical entities currently in preclinical stage for nine

principle disease areas described in this chapter; Angina, Atherosclerosis,

Arrhythmiasis, Atrial Fibrillation, Congestive Heart Failure, Hypercholesterolemia,

Hypertension, Myocardial Infarction, Thrombosis.

There are a total of 51 new chemical entities currently in Phase I trials for the same

nine principle disease areas and a total of 122 new chemical entities currently in

Phase II trials

Atherosclerosis represents the clinical area where there are the largest number of

preclinical and Phase I developments currently being studied. There are a total of

32 chemical entities currently in preclinicals and a total of 11 new chemical entities

have been identified in Phase I of development.

New and Emerging Cardiovascular Drugs

Two key anti-hypertensives are forecast to launch in 2007: Novartis’ Rasilez

(aliskiren) and Exforge (valsartan plus amlodipine).

On the 6th March 2007, the US FDA approved Tekturna® (aliskiren) for use in the

US for Novartis. On the 28th September 2006, Novartis submitted Tekturna to the

European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA) as a treatment for high blood

Page 15: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

15

pressure. Although approval has not been provided by the EMEA at the time of

writing, it is expected by the end of 2007.

It is anticipated that Exforge will be available to patients in the US in September

2007, pending the patent expiry of amlodipine besylate. In January 2007 Novartis

announced that the European Commission has granted approval for Exforge® with

its initial launch into Germany followed by launches in most other European Union

countries throughout the year, pending expiration of the patent protection for

Norvasc. The EU decision applies in all 27 EU member states plus Iceland and

Norway

In December 2006, Pfizer announced that it would discontinue the development of its

cholesterol drug torcetrapib. Torcetrapib was one of Pfizer's most promising pipeline

drugs and was anticipated to replace revenue lost when Lipitor’s patent protection

expires in 2010.

In April 2007, Abbott Laboratories announced that they had submitted a NDA to the

FDA for a fixed-dose combination of Niaspan® (extended-release niacin) and

simvastatin. Abbott Laboratories anticipate that they will obtain marketing approval

for Simcor by the third quarter 2007 and hope to launch at the beginning 2008.

A major blow to the anti-thrombotics pipeline is the discontinuation of AstraZeneca’s

Exanta in January 2006, due to concerns of liver toxicity. Exanta (ximelagatran) was

expected to achieve high sales when launched and to challenge sales of warfarin.

Solvay Pharmaceuticals announced on 25th April 2007 that they had submitted and

filed a dossier for intravenous anti-thrombotic tedisamil for approval by the US

FDA as well as by the authorities of European Union countries.

Page 16: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

16

Page 17: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

17

CHAPTER 1

The Management of Cardiovascular Disease

Page 18: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

18

Chapter 1 The Management of Cardiovascular Disease

Summary

Cardiovascular disease is the term used for a variety of ailments including chronic heart failure, atrial fibrillation, angina and peripheral arterial disease, amongst others. The US has by far the highest prevalence of cardiovascular disease, with Japan and Germany in second and third place respectively.

Despite a decline in CVD (cardiovascular disease) in the US it still remains the leading cause of death and accounts for 53% of all deaths in the US.

Increased concern over the rising mortality rates in central and Eastern Europe caused by CVD, where it is almost double that of the worst affected countries in the European Union. Despite issues about the quality and accuracy of data, the country causing most concern is the Russian Federation.

CVD are recognised to have a considerable economic impact on rapidly growing markets in the developing world. Improved economic conditions are expected to increase the high risk factors associated with CVD, like high blood pressure, tobacco use, alcohol consumption, cholesterol, obesity and a sedentary lifestyle.

Syndromes that are associated with acute coronary syndromes are correlated with age and the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. Unstable angina, which has the highest incidence rate across the seven major pharmaceutical markets, is estimated to be particularly prevalent in the UK and the US and low in Japan and Italy.

Page 19: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

19

Introduction

The term cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a generic term used to describe the variety of

diseases and conditions affecting the circulatory system (heart, heart valves, blood, and

vasculature of the body). It includes a wide variety of different conditions such as

arteriosclerosis, coronary artery disease (CAD), arrhythmia disorders, heart valve

disorders, diseases of the aorta and its branches, disorders of the peripheral vascular

system (PVD) and other congenital and acquired abnormalities of the circulatory

system. These diseases may be primary conditions—such as hypertension and

hypercholesterolemia that may lead to atherosclerosis, CAD, or PVD—or secondary

manifestations of the primary disease, including coronary heart disease (CHD)

(myocardial infarction (MI) and angina pectoris) and stroke.

The Global Burden of Cardiovascular Disease

According to many sources including the World Health Organisation (WHO)

cardiovascular disease is indisputably the world’s number one killer accounting for

over 14.7 million deaths in 1990. In a series of recent publications the WHO reported

that currently the number of deaths attributed to cardiovascular disease had increased to

over 16.5 million. By the year 2020 it is predicted that cardiovascular disease will

account for over 25 million deaths globally, including 19 million in developing

countries such as China and India.

CVD remains the leading cause of death in the United States

Despite the decline of 25% between 1994 and the year 2004, CVDs remain the leading

cause of death in the United States. According to the latest data from the American

Heart Association, CVD claims over 927,000 lives each year accounting for 38.0% of

all deaths (or 1 of every 2.6) in the United States in 2002. Figure 1.1 provides an

analysis of the breakdown of deaths from different cardiovascular disease in the United

States in 2002.

Page 20: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

20

The American Heart Association stated in their Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics –

2005 that Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) accounted for a total of 494,382 deaths

whilst Myocardial Infarction accounted for a further 179,514 deaths in the United

States in 2002. The American Stroke Association reported that strokes account for over

162,000 deaths each year or the equivalent of 6.2% of all deaths in the United States.

The remaining deaths being attributed to heart failure, and hypertension and

hypertensive heart disease. In 2003, congenital cardiovascular defects contributed only

0.5 percent of CVD deaths; however, they remain a leading cause of death in infants

and children. For example, congenital heart defects accounted for 1,445 infant deaths in

2003, or nearly 26% of infant deaths from all congenital defects.

Figure 1.1: Breakdown of Deaths from Cardiovascular Diseases, USA 2002

Congestive Heart Failure6.0%

Other13.0%

Stroke18.0%

Coronary Heart Disease53.0%

Rheumatic Heart Disease0.5%

High Blood Pressure5.0% Diseases of the

Arteries4.0%

Congenital Cardiovascular

Defects0.5%

Source: Center for Disease Control; National Centre for Health Statistics Business Insights Ltd

Page 21: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

21

CVD Rates in Central and Eastern Europe

Despite concerted efforts by national governments throughout the European Union to

reduce some of the risk factors associated with CVD it still remains the leading cause

of death accounting for over 1.5 million deaths each year. Nearly half (42 percent) of

all deaths in the EU are from CVD (46 percent of deaths in women and 38 percent of

deaths in men) and between one-third and one-half of deaths from CVD are from CHD

and over one-fourth are from stroke. The picture is just as bleak in Europe as a whole.

According to the European Heart Network, CVD currently accounts for an estimated 4

million deaths throughout Europe. Worryingly, mortality from the CVD is rising in

central and Eastern Europe, where it is almost double that of the worst affected

countries in the European Union. Despite issues about the quality and accuracy of data,

the country causing most concern is the Russian Federation. The Russian Federation

has the highest death rate due to CVD in the world with a reported 1,167 deaths per

100,000 men and 540 deaths per 100,000 women.

Noncommunicable Diseases in the Developing World

Cardiovascular diseases and other noncommunicable diseases were traditionally

considered to be diseases of industrialised countries – the so-called "Western diseases"

- brought about by ways of life utterly different from those in most of Africa, Asia and

many other parts of the developing world.

The reality is quite different. CVDs have not only emerged in all but the very poorest

countries, but are already well advanced. This growing burden has real potential to

hinder social and economic development. Figure 1.2 provides an analysis of the deaths

attributable to the 16 leading causes in the developing countries of Africa, Southeast

Asia, Western Pacific, Eastern Mediterranean and Africa, illustrating the consequences

of CVDs in the developing world.

Risk factors are indicators of future health status, and five of the top 10 risks

worldwide are specific to noncommunicable diseases. These include raised blood

pressure, tobacco use, alcohol consumption, cholesterol and obesity. This is part of the

Page 22: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

22

well-documented epidemiological transition called the "double burden" that sees the

arrival of the whole group of noncommunicable diseases with their shared risk factors

on top of the persisting threat of communicable diseases.

In the economically stable countries such as the United States, France, Germany, the

United Kingdom and Italy, death from cardiovascular disease may occur after a

relatively long and productive life. Conversely in the developing countries such as

India and China almost half of deaths attributed to CVD are amongst the relatively

young and who are in the prime of their working lives. Their deaths are not only

personal tragedies, but they could also have a devastating impact on economic growth

and development in these countries.

One reason for the epidemic of cardiovascular disease is the surge in life expectancy

due to a decline in deaths related to infectious diseases and nutritional deficiencies. In

India, for example, life expectancy rose from 41.2 years in 1951 to 61.7 years by 2003

(General Register of India 2003). In China, the current average life expectancy is 72

years but this is projected to rise dramatically to 85 years by the year 2050. Ironically,

these extra years provide a longer time period for such risk factors as smoking, high-fat

diet, and sedentary lifestyle to set the stage for heart attack and stroke.

Page 23: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

23

Figure 1.2: Leading causes of death in developing countries, 2002

0 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000

12,000,000

Maternal conditions

Diabetes mellitus

Diseases of the genitourinary system

Neuropsychiatric disorders

Malaria

Digestive diseases

Childhood diseases

Tuberculosis

Diarrhoeal diseases

Perinatal conditions

HIV/AIDS

Respiratory diseases

Respiratory infections

Injuries

Malignant neoplasms

Cardiovascular diseases

Low Mortality Developing Countries High Mortality Developing Countries

Source: World Health Report (WHO) 2003 Business Insights Ltd

Background to the Major Cardiovascular Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)

Atherosclerosis

Atherosclerosis (more commonly called "hardening of the arteries") is a degenerative

disease which covers a variety of conditions caused by fatty or calcium deposits in the

Page 24: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

24

artery walls, causing them to thicken. This fatty material, known as plaque, thickens,

hardens, and may eventually block the arteries.

Plaque is a complex structure made up of a combination of cholesterol, other fatty

materials, calcium, and blood components that stick to the artery wall lining. Plaques

may be presented in different shapes and sizes but they always form a type of hard

shell or scar like covering. Sometimes plaques become unstable and can eventually

rupture or burst. If a plaque ruptures it causes blood clotting inside the artery, which

can stop blood flow completely.

There are no specific defining symptoms of atherosclerosis, rather the symptoms are

highly variable and differ from patient to patient. Patients with mild atherosclerosis

typically have symptoms of cardiovascular diseases and signs and myocardial

infarction. However, many patients with anatomically advanced disease may have no

symptoms and may not even experience functional impairment. Initially thought to be a

chronic, slowly progressive, degenerative disease, it is now apparent that

atherosclerosis is a disease with periods of activity and quiescence. Although a

systemic disease, it affects different organ systems in different patients for reasons that

remain unclear.

Atherosclerosis results in progressive luminal narrowing of an artery due to

accumulation of fibrous plaque. This results in impairment of flow once more than 50-

70% of the lumen diameter is obstructed. The impairment in the flow rate results in

inadequate blood supply to the target organ, should there be an increased demand for

oxygen as a result of increased metabolic activity. This can manifest itself in the form

of stable angina pectoris, intermittent claudication, or mesenteric angina.

Atherosclerosis is typically caused by the separation of a plaque or denudation of the

endothelium overlying a fibrous plaque. This will cause the exposure of the highly

thrombogenic subendothelium and underlying lipid core. This could result in the

formation of a thrombus, which may partially or completely occlude flow in the

Page 25: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

25

involved artery. The clinical symptoms of the partial or complete acute occlusion of an

artery are unstable angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack,

and stroke. Atheroembolism is a distinct clinical entity that may occur spontaneously

or as a complication of aortic surgery, angiography, or thrombolytic therapy in patients

with advanced and diffuse atherosclerosis.

Angina Pectoris

Angina, otherwise known as angina pectoris, is a clinical syndrome characterised by

severe pain and/or discomfort which usually originates in the chest and may radiate to

the shoulder, arm, jaw, neck, back or other areas. The pain is often described as

tightness, squeezing, crushing, burning, choking or aching. It is caused by inadequate

blood flow through the blood vessels (coronary vessels) of the heart muscle

(myocardium). In the U.S. and Europe, the most common cause of angina is

artherosclerosis.

There are three forms of angina-

Stable angina: Stable angina is a repeating pattern of chest pain which has not

changed in character, frequency, intensity or duration for several weeks. The level

of activity or stress that provokes angina is predictable and the pattern changes

slowly. Stable angina is the most common form and it appears gradually;

Unstable angina: Unstable angina describes a syndrome that is intermediate

between stable angina and myocardial infarction (heart attack). Unstable angina is

characterized by an accelerating or "crescendo" pattern of chest pain that lasts

longer than in stable angina, occurs at rest or with less exertion than stable angina,

or is less responsive to medication. Eugene Braunwald recently suggested that

unstable angina was sub-divided into 5 separate categories. He described these as:

(i) Nonocclusive thrombus on a pre-existing atheromatous plaque, which

has usually undergone disruption.

Page 26: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

26

(ii) Dynamic obstruction, i.e. various forms of coronary spasm.

(iii) Progressive mechanical obstruction, due to progression of

atherosclerotic lesions or the development of restenotic lesions after

angioplasty.

(iv) Inflammation and/or infection of an atheromatous plaque, as yet

unproven.

(v) Secondary to systemic diseases that impair oxygen delivery (e.g.

anaemia) or increase heart work (e.g. thyrotoxicosis);

Variant angina (Prinzmetal’s angina): Variant angina pectoris or coronary artery

spasm (Prinzmetal’s angina) is caused by a vasospasm, a spasm that narrows the

coronary artery and lessens the blood flow to the heart. Prinzmetal's Angina usually

occurs in arteries already narrowed by atherosclerosis, in fact most people with it

have severe coronary atherosclerosis in at least one major vessel. The spasm

usually occurs very close to the blockage. Unlike stable and unstable angina,

Prinzmetal's Angina usually occurs when a person is at rest or sleep and not after

physical exertion or emotional stress. It is associated with acute myocardial

infarction, severe cardiac arrhythmias including ventricular tachycardia and

fibrillation, and sudden cardiac death;

Population based studies in countries with high or relatively high coronary artery

disease rates indicate that the prevalence is related to both age and gender. In men aged

45-54 years the rate is 2-5%, increasing to 11-20% in the 65 to 74 year age group. Pre-

menopausal women enjoy a relatively low prevalence of coronary artery disease,

estimated at 0.5-1% between the ages of 45-54 years. In post-menopausal women the

prevalence increases rapidly to equal that of men by the age of 75.

Page 27: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

27

Acute Myocardial Infarction (MI)

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or more commonly known as “heart attack”, is the

rapid development of myocardial necrosis caused by a critical imbalance between the

oxygen supply and demand of the myocardium. It occurs when oxygen delivery to and

waste removal from the myocardium falls below normal levels with oxygen demand

exceeding supply. As a consequence, the metabolic machinery of myocardial cells is

impaired, leading to various degrees of systolic (contractile) and diastolic (relaxation)

dysfunction. Acute myocardial infarction is usually diagnosed indirectly through

techniques that demonstrate reduced myocardial blood flow.

The most common cause of AMI is narrowing of the epicardial blood vessels due to

atheromatous plaques. This plaque sometimes ruptures and separates from the blood

vessel wall with the subsequent exposure of the basement membrane. This results in

platelet aggregation, thrombus formation, fibrin accumulation, hemorrhage into the

plaque, and varying degrees of vasospasm. This can result in partial or complete

occlusion of the vessel and subsequent myocardial ischemia. Provided that reperfusion

can be performed within 4-6 hours of total occlusion of the vessel it is possible to

salvage the myocardium, reducing morbidity and mortality. If total occlusion occurs for

more than 4-6 hours then myocardial necrosis takes place.

The symptoms of MI include chest discomfort such as pressure, squeezing, fullness, or

pain in the centre of the chest that lasts more than a few minutes or that goes away and

then returns. Symptoms also may include pain or discomfort in one or both arms, the

back, neck, jaw, or stomach; shortness of breath (either accompanying chest discomfort

or occurring earlier); breaking out in a cold sweat; and feelings of nausea or light-

headedness. If blood flow is not restored to the ischemic region within a short time

period, cardiac tissue death occurs.

Myocardial infarction (MI) is the most prominent of ischaemic heart diseases.

Throughout the 1990s, deaths from ischaemic heart diseases have declined

considerably in most Western countries. Changing coronary event rates is the major

Page 28: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

28

determinant of this decline, whereas improved coronary care and secondary prevention

were responsible for decreased event rates. Despite these promising developments,

ischaemic heart diseases will remain a major health issue during the decades ahead for

several reasons. First, ischaemic heart diseases will persist at early ages in individuals

with a genetic predisposition and in those with an unfavourable clinical risk profile.

Furthermore, survivors of an acute coronary syndrome constitute a population with

chronic cardiac conditions and remain at increased risk of future fatal and non-fatal

cardiac events. In addition, evidence exists that patients and doctors fail to adequately

put effective preventive measures into practice. Last, but not the least, populations in

the Western world are ageing and as such heart disease is expected to increase in

proportion to the ageing population.

Table 1.1: Age- and gender-specific incidence of recognised MI Person years No. of cases Incidence rate per 1000 person years 95% CI) Men Women Men Women Men Women All individuals 10 262 17 859 86 55 8.4 (6.6, 10.2) 3.1 (2.3, 3.9) 55–59 905 1 387 3 2 3.3 (–0.4, 7.1) 1.4 (–0.6, 3.4) 60–64 2 477 3 623 11 8 4.4 (1.8, 7.1) 2.2 (0.7, 3.7) 65–69 2 572 3 700 22 5 8.6 (5.0, 12.1) 1.4 (0.2, 2.5) 70–74 1 968 3 378 25 16 12.7 (7.7, 17.7) 4.7 (2.4, 7.1) 74–79 1 300 2 693 12 10 9.2 (4.0, 14.5) 3.7 (1.4, 6.0) ≥80 1 040 3 078 13 14 12.5 (5.7, 19.3) 4.6 (2.2, 6.9)

Source: The Rotterdam Study Business Insights Ltd

Table 1.2: Age- and gender-specific incidence of unrecognised MI Person years No. of cases Incidence rate per 1000 person years 95% CI) Men Women Men Women Men Women All individuals 8 866 14 638 37 52 4.2 (2.8, 5.5) 3.6 (2.6, 4.5) 55–59 8.39 1 258 1 3 1.2 (–1.1, 3.5) 2.4 (–0.3, 5.1) 60–64 2 317 3 278 6 6 2.6 (0.5, 4.7) 1.8 (0.4, 3.3) 65–69 2 321 3 320 7 11 3.0 (0.8, 5.3) 3.3 (1.4, 5.3) 70–74 1 735 2 922 15 5 8.6 (4.3, 13.0) 1.7 (0.2, 3.2) 74–79 1 015 2 118 6 15 5.9 (1.2, 10.6) 7.1 (3.5, 10.7) ≥80 640 1 743 2 12 3.1 (–1.2, 7.5) 6.9 (3.0, 10.8)

Source: The Rotterdam Study Business Insights Ltd

Page 29: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

29

Heart Valve Disorders

There are four valves in the heart: the aortic valve, the mitral valve, the tricuspid valve,

and the pulmonary valve. The valves keep the blood flowing in one direction. They

open when the pressure of the blood pushes them in the forward direction and they

close when the pressure on the other side of the valve pushes them back. Diseased

valves may be too stiff to open easily or they may fail to close completely. There are a

number of different heart valve disorders. In brief these are:

Aortic heart valve

There are 2 principle diseases of the aortic valve: aortic regurgitation or insufficiency

and aortic stenosis.

Aortic Regurgitation or Aortic insufficiency: This is a heart valve disease in which

the aortic valve weakens or balloons, preventing the valve from closing tightly.

This leads to backward flow of blood from the aorta (the largest blood vessel) into

the left ventricle (the left lower chamber of the heart). Aortic insufficiency affects

approximately 5 out of every 10,000 people. It is most common in men between the

ages of 30 and 60. In its most serious form, aortic regurgitation is caused by an

infection that leaves holes in the valve leaflets. Other causes, though rare, may

include:

Marfan syndrome, a connective tissue condition where patients have long

bones and very flexible joints;

Endocarditis;

ankylosing spondylitis (arthritis of the spine);

dissecting aortic aneurysm;

aortic stenosis, a narrowing of the aortic valve that is often causes some

degree of aortic regurgitation.

Page 30: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

30

Aortic Stenosis: Aortic stenosis is a narrowing or blockage of the aortic valve. This

valve regulates the blood flow from the heart's lower-left chamber (the left

ventricle) into the aorta. The aorta is the main blood supplier to the rest of the body.

Aortic stenosis happens when the valve leaflets become coated with deposits. The

deposits change the shape of the leaflets and reduce blood flow through the valve.

The left ventricle has to work harder to make up for the reduced blood flow. Over

time, the extra work can weaken the heart muscle.

Aortic stenosis is more common among men. Congenital defects and rheumatic

fever are the main causes of aortic stenosis in people under 50. In some cases,

people are born with a bicuspid aortic valve, meaning the valve has 2 leaflets

instead of 3. This may also cause aortic stenosis. In elderly patients, calcium

deposits and the growth of fibrous tissue on the aortic valve can distort the leaflets

or cause them to fuse together. This is called calcification, and it can make the

different leaflets almost look like a single one. Other causes include a history of

other valve disease, coronary artery disease, or a heart murmur. People with aortic

stenosis may not have symptoms for years.

Mitral Valve Disease

There are 3 types of mitral valve disease:

Mitral Valve Prolapse (MVP): In a normal valve the flow of blood goes from the

left atrium to the left ventricle. Upon closing it prevents blood from going back into

the left atrium. With MVP the flaps don't close evenly. One or both flaps collapse

backwards, sometimes allowing a small amount of blood to leak through the valve.

MVP is a genetic disorder and seems to affect women three times more than men.

MVP is frequently diagnosed in healthy people and is, for the most part, harmless.

Most people suffer no symptoms at all. MVP affects about 15 to 25 percent of the

population. Forty percent of these people have dysautonomia (MVP Syndrome).

Seventy percent of patients have depression. Only 2 percent of MVP patients have

actual structural problems. At least 40 to 60 percent of MVPS patients suffer from

panic attacks. MVPS patients often have low energy levels. Forty to 50 percent of

echocardiograms do not detect MVP. MVP is also called floppy valve syndrome,

Page 31: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

31

Barlow's or Reid-Barlow's syndrome, ballooning mitral valve, midsystolic-click-

late systolic murmur syndrome, or click murmur syndrome. MVP can be present

from birth or develop at any age and occurs equally in both men and women. The

list of symptoms mentioned in various sources for mitral-valve prolapse includes:

heart murmuring, heart click, mitral regurgitation, dizziness, skipping heart, racing

heart, chest pain and shortness of breath.

Mitral regurgitation: Acute mitral regurgitation is a disorder in which the heart's

mitral valve suddenly does not close properly, causing blood to leak (back-flow)

into the left atrium (upper heart chamber) when the left ventricle (lower heart

chamber) contracts. Chronic mitral regurgitation is a long-term disorder in which

the valve (mitral valve) that separates the left upper chamber of the heart (atrium)

from the left lower chamber (ventricle) does not close properly. Some of the

possible causes of mitral regurgitation include congenital heart defects, rheumatic

fever, prior heart attack, heart inflammation and heart infection. Mitral

regurgitation is common in older age groups and is twice as common in women.

The incidence of mitral valvular stenosis varies considerably in different parts of

the world. It is more common (and presents earlier) in the Middle East, India and

the Far East than elsewhere. It is more common in women and presents in

developed countries in the fourth or fifth decades of life. Its incidence in older

people approximates that of acute rheumatic fever.

Mitral Stenosis: This is the narrowing of the mitral heart valve. The principle

underlying condition causing mitral stenosis is rheumatic fever usually from

childhood times. The symptoms of mitral stenosis are similar for mitral

incompetence and diastolic murmur.

Page 32: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

32

Pulmonary Valve Disease

There are essentially 2 different forms of pulmonary valve disease i.e. regurgitation or

pulmonary incompetence i.e. poorly closing leaking pulmonary heart valve and

pulmonary valve stenosis. Pulmonary valve stenosis is a condition, usually present at

birth (congenital), in which outflow of blood from the right ventricle (lower chamber)

of the heart is obstructed at the level of the pulmonic valve (the valve which separates

the heart from the pulmonary artery).

Tricuspid Valve Disease

Tricuspid valve disease refers to damage to the tricuspid heart valve. This valve is

located between the atrium (upper chamber) and the ventricle (lower pumping

chamber) of the right side of the heart. The tricuspid valve has three cusps, or flaps,

that control the direction and flow of blood. The two main types of tricuspid valve

disease are tricuspid stenosis - narrowing of the tricuspid valve and tricuspid

regurgitation - backflow of blood into the atrium from the ventricle due to improper

closing of the tricuspid valve flaps. Other tricuspid valve disease includes rheumatic

tricuspid valve disease and tricuspid insufficiency. Rheumatic fever is the most

common cause of tricuspid valve disease. Less common causes include congenital

heart problems, heart attack or coronary heart disease, congestive heart failure,

endocarditis, and trauma to the heart and occasionally tumours.

High Blood Pressure: Hypertension

Blood pressure is measured by two numbers; systolic pressure and diastolic pressure.

Systolic pressure measures cardiac output and refers to the pressure in the arterial

system at its highest. Diastolic pressure measures peripheral resistance and refers to

arterial pressure at its lowest. Blood pressure is normally measured at the brachial

artery with a sphygmomanometer (pressure cuff) in millimeters of mercury (mm Hg)

and given as systolic over diastolic pressure.

A blood pressure reading thus appears as two numbers. The upper number is the

systolic pressure, which is the peak force of blood as the heart pumps it. The lower

Page 33: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

33

number is the diastolic pressure, which is the pressure when the heart is filling or

relaxing before the next beat. Normal blood pressure for an adult is 120/70 (on

average), but normal for an individual varies with the height, weight, fitness level, age,

and health of a person. Hypertension, or high blood pressure, is defined as a reading of

140/90 on three consecutive measurements at least six hours apart. Consistently high

blood pressure causes the heart to work harder than it should and can damage the

coronary arteries, the brain, the kidneys, and the eyes and is a major cause of stroke.

Hypertension is classified as either primary (or essential) hypertension or secondary

hypertension. Primary hypertension has no specific origin but is strongly associated

with lifestyle. It is responsible for 90 to 95 percent of diagnosed hypertension and is

treated with stress management, changes in diet, increased physical activity, and

medication (if needed). Secondary hypertension is responsible for 5 to 10 percent of

diagnosed hypertension. It is caused by a preexisting medical condition such as

congestive heart failure, kidney failure, liver failure, or damage to the endocrine

system.

Heart Rhythm Disorders (Heart Arrhythmia)

Heart rhythm disorders or arrhythmias are defined as abnormal rhythms of the heart

and is a disruption of the normal electrical impulses controlling the speed of the

heartbeat. The electrical system regulating heartbeat consists of 2 main areas of control

and a series of conducting pathways.

The sinoatrial node (or SA) is located in the right atrium. It provides the main

control and is the source of each beat. The SA node also keeps up with the body's

overall need for blood and increases the heart rate when necessary, such as during

exercise, emotional excitement, or illness such as fever. The SA node is sometimes

called the "natural pacemaker" of the heart;

Electrical impulses leave the SA node and travel through special conducting

pathways in the heart to the other controller, the atrioventricular, or AV, node. The

purpose of the AV node is to provide a pathway for impulses from the atria to the

Page 34: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

34

ventricles. It also creates a delay in conduction from the atria to the ventricle. This

causes the atria to contract first and allow the ventricles to fill with blood before

they contract themselves.

Abnormal heart rhythms or arrhythmias fall into three general classes: excessively slow

heart rates, known as bradyarrhythmias or bradycardias, and overly rapid heart rates,

known as tachyarrhythmias or tachycardias; the location (ventricles-lower chambers of

heart or atria-upper chambers) or premature heartbeats; and the beat (steady or chaotic

and irregular) described as fibrillations.

Bradycardias: This is the term used to describe excessively slow heartbeats. A

normal heart contracts about 100,000 times each day, at a rate of 60 to 100 times a

minute. The weak pace may mean the heart doesn't beat often enough to ensure

blood flow. Slow heart rates can be the result of certain medications, congenital

heart disease, or the degenerative processes of aging. Heart block (or AV Block)

and Sick Sinus Syndrome are forms of bradycardia;

Tachycardias: The term tachycardia refers to a rapid heartbeat of over 100 beats per

minute. There are two predominant types of tachycardia: supraventricular

tachycardia (SVT) and ventricular tachycardia (VT). SVT or paroxysmal SVT

occurs when any structure above the ventricle (usually the atria or the AV node)

produces a regular, rapid discharge. The most common type of SVT is atrial

fibrillation (AT), an irregular and rapid heartbeat in the upper chambers of the heart

(or atria). Ventricular tachycardia arises from the ventricles and cause a very rapid

heart rate. This is usually a life-threatening tachycardia and needs immediate

medical attention, possibly electrical shock or defibrillation;

Premature heartbeats: Premature heartbeats occur when the heart's regular rhythm

is interrupted by early or premature beats. It may feel as if the heart has skipped a

beat. If the beat arises from locations in the atria (upper chambers) it is called

premature atrial contractions (PACs). Premature ventricular beats (also called

premature ventricular contractions or PVCs) arise from the ventricles (lower

chambers);

Page 35: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

35

Fibrillation: Fibrillation describes a heartbeat that is chaotic, or irregular, and may

seem to skip beats or beat out of rhythm. This occurs when a chamber of the heart

goes into spasm and fails to pump. There are two types of fibrillation: atrial

fibrillation and ventricular fibrillation.

Peripheral Vascular Disease

There are essentially two different forms of peripheral vascular disease. These are

Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and Peripheral Venous Disorders (PVD)

Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD)

Peripheral Artery disease (PAD) is a group of diseases that affects the body’s blood

vessels (the arteries and capillaries) and describes all of the conditions that can affect

the arteries of the body outside of the heart as opposed to coronary artery disease

(CAD) which refers to conditions within the heart. Peripheral arterial disease is a type

of artherosclerosis, in which the arteries become hardened and narrowed. It is often

named after the artery that is affected. There are four major areas where peripheral

arterial disease (PAD) produces symptoms and have clinical significance and relevance

to this report. These are:

Carotid artery disease (CAD): carotid artery disease is a form of peripheral artery

disease in which there is a hardening of the artery otherwise known as

atherosclerosis in the carotid arteries (a more detailed description of atherosclerosis

is provided below). These arteries, which lie in the neck, carry oxygen-rich blood to

the brain and face. During atherosclerosis, the inside of the artery is gradually

narrowed with a build-up of fatty plaque. The stenosis or occlusion of the artery can

occur as a direct result of the narrowing of the artery as a result of plaque buildup

or as plaque hardens (calcifies), there is a chance pieces may break off and travel

further downstream in the artery. If the pieces of plaque become stuck in an artery

and obstruct the flow of oxygen-rich blood, the person can suffer a stroke or an

ischemic stroke. This is caused by a severe lack of oxygen-rich blood reaching the

brain or a cerebral ischemia;

Page 36: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

36

Renal artery disease: renal artery stenosis (RAS) is a condition in which the blood

vessels (the suprarenal and renal arteries) that feed oxygen-rich blood to the

kidneys become obstructed. The renal arteries usually arise at 90 degrees from the

aorta at the level of the intervertebral disc between L1 and L2. Renal artery stenosis

is usually caused by atherosclerosis (narrowing of the artery due to the build-up of

plaque), fibromuscular disease in which fibrous tissue grows in the arterial wall, or

scar tissue caused by injury to the kidney. Renal artery stenosis is a common cause

of high blood pressure (hypertension) because it can restrict blood flow to the

kidneys, which can result in elevated blood pressure. The kidneys serve as filters,

and they remove waste products and excess fluids from the body. In this role, they

receive almost one-third of the body’s blood flow, and any obstruction in their

function has an effect throughout the body;

Peripheral artery disease (PAD/LEPAD): peripheral artery disease of the lower

extremities is usually presented as atherosclerosis of the major arteries of the legs.

The three arteries that are usually affected include Iliac arteries (located inside the

lower abdomen), Femoral arteries (located in the thigh), Tibial arteries (located

below the knee).

Normally oxygen-rich blood flows down these three arteries to supply the muscles

of the buttocks, legs and feet. As a result of atherosclerosis the blood flow down

these arteries is impeded as a result of the narrowing and hardening the arteries, in

the same way it can impede blood flow to the heart;

Mesenteric artery disease (MAD): mesenteric artery disease or mesenteric artery

ischemia (MAI) is the narrowing or blockage of one or more of the three

mesenteric arteries including the inferior and superior mesenteric arteries, which

are the major arteries supplying the small and large intestines. The narrowing or

blockage of the arteries is caused by either atherosclerosis, or hardening of the

arteries or alternatively, it can be caused by a blood clot (embolus), which travels

through the bloodstream and suddenly blocks one of the mesenteric arteries. The

source of these clots is usually the heart or the aorta. Such an embolus is seen more

commonly in patients with heart arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation, which

Page 37: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

37

predisposes patients to formation of clots within the chambers of the heart. With the

beating of the heart, these clots break loose and can travel to the arteries of the

intestine.

Peripheral Venous Disorders (PVD)

The second type of peripheral vascular disease is peripheral venous disorders.

Peripheral venous disorders or venous disease indicate problems in the flow of oxygen-

poor blood from the extremities back toward the heart. Venous circulation is comprised

of superficial veins and deep veins. Unlike arteries, veins contain one-way valves that

permit the flow of blood toward the heart at a very low pressure. There are a number of

different peripheral venous disorders including thrombophlebitis.

Thrombophlebitis is a condition in which a blood clot (a thrombus) has formed inside a

vein, causing the surrounding veins to become inflamed (phlebitis). There are two

types of thrombophlebitis: superficial vein thrombus (SVT) and deep vein thrombosis

(DVT). SVT causes little medical risk. However, DVT can be life-threatening if the

blood clot or pieces of the blood clot break loose and travel to another part of the body,

lodging in another blood vessel and causing an embolism. If pieces of the clot lodge in

an artery of the lungs, it could cause a potentially fatal pulmonary embolism.

A second form of peripheral venous disorder is known as Chronic Venous

Insufficiency (CVI). Chronic venous insufficiency is a form of vein disease in which

the veins of the leg no longer allow normal blood flow (incompetent). Vein

incompetence is characterized by problems involving valves within the vein. Valves

are distributed throughout all of the veins and allow blood to flow passively but in only

one direction, towards the heart. Incompetent vein valves allow blood to flow in both

directions, thus allowing blood to pool or “stagnate,” particularly in more areas of the

body such as the legs. If untreated, some patients with CVI will experience pain,

swelling, discoloration or ulcers that do not heal.

Page 38: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

38

Stroke or Cerebrovascular Accidents (CVA)

A stroke is normally defined as a sudden, nonconvulsive loss of neurologic function

due to an ischemic or hemorrhagic intracranial vascular event. In general,

cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) are classified according to their anatomic location in

the brain, vascular distribution, etiology, age of the affected individual, and

hemorrhagic vs. nonhemorrhagic nature. There are two major causes of stroke:

Ischaemic Stroke

This is caused as a result of:

Cerebral thrombosis: A cerebral thrombosis occurs when a blood clot forms inside

the brain, stopping the flow of blood to or from the brain. The most common cause

for the formation of a blood clot is the hardening of the arteries, or atherosclerosis.

The fatty deposits (plaques) that have built up in the arteries carrying blood to the

brain can cause clots to form on the plaques that narrow or block the flow of

oxygen and nutrients to the brain.

Cerebral embolism: Cerebral embolism is also caused by a blood clot, air bubble or

fat globule (embolism). An embolic stroke is caused by a blood clot formed in

another part of the body that breaks loose, travels through the bloodstream, and

blocks an artery carrying oxygen and nutrients to the brain. When traveling through

the body the blood clot is called an embolus;

Lacunar stroke: a blockage in the tiny blood vessels deep within the brain.

Haemorrhagic stroke

This is caused by bleeding within or around the brain, resulting in compression and

injury to the tissue. The broken blood vessel prevents needed oxygen and nutrients

from reaching brain cells. There are essential two forms of hemorrhagic stroke. These

are:

Subarachnoid hemorrhage: This occurs when a blood vessel on the surface of the

brain bleeds into the area between the brain and skull (the subarachnoid space).

Page 39: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

39

Subarachnoid hemorrhage, which accounts for 5 to 10 percent of strokes, is one of

the deadliest type of strokes. While ischemic strokes have a 30-day mortality rate of

20 percent, subarachnoid bleeds kill 40% of their victims in the same time,

disabling half the survivors;

Intracerebral hemorrhagic (ICH): This occurs when a blood vessel bursts within the

brain. Intracerebral hemorrhage, or ICH, accounts for 10 to 15 percent of all

strokes. It most frequently results from high blood pressure as found in people with

hypertension, eclampsia, and abuse of some drugs. A third of intracerebral bleeds

result in intraventricular hemorrhage, or bleeding within the brain's ventricles. ICH

has a mortality rate of 44 percent after 30 days.

A considerable amount of information about the incidence, mortality rates for stroke

has been gathered from the Framingham Heart Study. This study was originally

commissioned to determine long-term trends in the incidence, lifetime risk, severity,

and 30-day risk of death from clinical stroke. The original 9,152 participants were

recruited in 1948 in Massachusetts USA. A recently published update of the original

Framingham Study has revealed that since then, the risk of stroke by age 90 has

decreased from 19.5 percent to 14.5 percent in men 65 and older, and from 18.0 percent

to 16.1 percent for women. However the authors concluded that although the incidence

has declined the severity of stroke has not decreased, and 30-day mortality has

decreased significantly only in men, perhaps due to older age at onset of stroke and

more severe strokes in women.

Page 40: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

40

Page 41: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

41

CHAPTER 2

Latest Developments in Cardiovascular and PCI

Procedures

Page 42: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

42

Chapter 2 Latest Developments in Cardiovascular and PCI Procedures

Summary

Since the introduction of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCI) or Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary (PTCA) the number of procedures carried out has increased dramatically, becoming one of the most common medical interventions performed and has transformed the practice of revascularization for coronary disease.

42.6% of all percutaneous coronary interventions carried out in Europe in 2005 were used primarily to treat unstable angina. 20.2% of all percutaneous coronary interventions were used to treat acute ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI).

There are significant differences in PCI procedural rates in different regions across the world. Germany has the highest procedural rate in the world with an estimated 225,500 carried out in 2005/2006 (2,765 pmp) compared with China with an estimated total number of 95,912 PCI procedures (73 pmp) and India with an estimated total number of 42,123 PCI procedures (41 pmp).

Emerging technologies and recent product developments include the market entry of embolic protection devices incorporating distal filter devices such as the FilterWire EZ™ Embolic Protection System developed by Boston Scientific, distal balloon occlusive devices such as TriActiv FX(R) Embolic Protection System from Kensey Nash and proximal balloon occlusive devices such as the Parodi Anti-Emboli System (PAES) developed by ArteriA Medical Science.

Other developments include the emergence of Rotational Coronary Atherectomy (Rotoblation), Directional Coronary Atherectomy (DCA). Orbital Atherectomy and Ablative laser-assisted angioplasty and innovative minimally invasive technologies and techniques.

Page 43: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

43

Introduction to Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (previously called Angioplasty, Percutaneous

Transluminal Coronary, or Balloon Angioplasty) is a technique used to widen the

narrowing in the artery without surgery. The basic idea of angioplasty is to position a

catheter with a small inflatable balloon on the end within the narrowed section of the

artery. The balloon is then inflated, which pushes outward against the narrowing and

surrounding wall of the artery. The inflated balloon opens the narrowed artery by

splitting and compressing the plaque and slightly stretching the wall of the artery. The

balloon may be inflated several times during angioplasty. Each balloon is made of

special materials that allow it to inflate to a specific size. The interventionalist selects a

balloon that will be approximately the same size as the artery.

Andreas Gruentzig in Zurich, Switzerland carried out the first PCI procedure in 1977.

It wasn’t until the mid 1980s that the procedure became popular and more widely used

throughout Europe when at that time PCI was commonly performed through a catheter

inserted into the patient’s femoral artery, which is located in the groin area. In the mid-

1990s an alternative approach using either brachial or radial artery access was

developed. Since the original procedure was carried out a variety of new innovative

technologies have been introduced. This includes the introduction of a variety of

products including balloon catheters, coronary guiding catheters and guidewires,

introducers/sheaths, inflation devices, and arterial access closure devices as well as

other ancillary items. The introduction of these products coupled with improved

angiographic imaging modalities, are making it possible to use PCI to treat an

increasingly wide range of coronary artery blockages.

Since the introduction of PCI the procedure has increased dramatically, becoming one

of the most common medical interventions performed and has transformed the practice

of revascularization for coronary disease. Initially used in the treatment of patients with

stable angina and discrete lesions in a single coronary artery, coronary angioplasty has

multiple indications today, including unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction (MI),

and multivessel coronary artery disease. With the combination of sophisticated

Page 44: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

44

equipment, experienced operators, and modern drug therapy, coronary angioplasty has

evolved into an effective nonsurgical modality for treating patients with CAD.

Indications for PCI

According to the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS) and the European

Society of Cardiology (ESC) the principle indications for PCI are stable and unstable

angina, angina equivalent (e.g. dyspnea, arrhythmia, dizziness/syncope) so as to relieve

anginal symptoms, to retard disease progression, and to prevent death or myocardial

infarction. In patients presenting with evolving myocardial infarction, immediate

revascularization by means of primary percutaneous intervention is today considered to

be the best treatment option. In clinical practice however indications for

revascularization are determined as much by availability as by risk assessment.

According to the European Heart Survey being conducted by the European Society of

Cardiology (ESC) and presented at the European Heart Survey Symposium in

Barcelona September 2006 treatment of stable angina accounted for 42.6% of a sample

of 13,544 patients taken from 143 hospitals from 30 ESC member countries. Acute

coronary syndrome accounted for the remaining 57.4%. An analysis of the all

indications by type is provided in Figure 2.1.

PCI Procedural Volumes

Between 1979 and 1985 the number of PCIs performed in the United States

skyrocketed from 2000 to 82 000. This stunning growth reflected the fact that by 1985

many of the nation’s thousands of invasive cardiologists had transformed themselves

into interventionalists by attending brief demonstration courses or by being mentored

by a colleague who had already done so. This growth continued throughout the 1990s

and by the year 2002 had reached to 657,000 or the equivalent of 2,334 per million

population. Table 2.3 provides an analysis of the number of inpatient cardiovascular

procedures by region in the United States in the year 2002.

Page 45: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

45

Table 2.3: Estimated volume of cardiovascular procedures by region (US 2002)

Region Procedures NorthEast MidWest South West Total Angioplasty 211 323 416 254 1,204 PTCA 110 182 229 136 657 Stenting 105 138 186 118 547 Cardiac Revascularization 104 117 204 90 515 Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterizations 281 342 585 255 1,463 Endarterectomy 33 29 55 17 134 Implantable Defibrillators 20 14 20 9 63 Open-Heart Surgery 160 156 258 135 709 Pacemakers 50 36 78 35 199 Valves 30 15 30 18 93 Total Vascular and Cardiac Surgery 1094 1352 2061 1067 5,574 Figures in thousands Estimates are based on a sample of inpatient records from short-stay hospitals in the United States (National Hospital Discharge Survey).

Source: Health Resources Utilization Branch, CDC/NCHS. Business Insights Ltd

PCI Used Primarily to Treat Unstable Angina and acute ST-elevation MI

According to data and information gathered from the European Heart Survey:

European Society of Cardiology and the European Association of Percutaneous

Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) 42.6% of all percutaneous coronary

interventions carried out in Europe in 2005 were used primarily to treat unstable

angina. 20.2% of all percutaneous coronary interventions were used to treat acute ST-

elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI). A total of 59% of all percutaneous coronary

interventions procedures carried out were for the treatment of various forms of angina.

Page 46: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

46

Figure 2.3: Use of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Europe, 2005

Stable Angina42.6%

Post Unstable Angina 9.3%Unstable Angina

7.1%

Post NSTEMI8.1%

NSTEMI5.8%

Post STEMI6.9%

STEMI20.2%

Source: European Society of Cardiology and the European Association of PercutaneousCardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) Business Insights Ltd

Inter-country Variance in PCI Procedural Rates

Table 2.4 illustrates the differences between PCI procedural rates from some selected

countries from the developed world compared with selected countries from the

developing world. Germany has the highest procedural rate in the world with an

estimated 225,500 carried out in 2005/2006 (2,765 pmp). This compares with 131,665

procedures carried out in France (2,194 pmp) and a total of 70,142 (1,165 pmp) in the

United Kingdom. In contrast India and China have dramatically lower procedural rates

compared with the norm in Europe and North America.

Page 47: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

47

China and India: Huge growth potential and market development

The latest official information from China is that a total of 95,912 PCI procedures are

carried out in a country with a population of 1,313 million (73 pmp). Similarly the

latest official figures from India suggests that only 42,123 PCI procedures are carried

out in India (41 pmp) in 2005. There is however clear and incontrovertible evidence to

suggest that there is considerable underreporting in these countries. In China for

example it is estimated that in 2006 over 170,000 PCI procedures took place increasing

to an estimated 201,000 PCI procedures in 2007 (+18.4%). Given that on average an

estimated 1.3 stents are used per procedure this represents a total of 219,000 stent

placements in 2006 and 263,000 stent placements in 2007.

Similarly in India industry sources estimate that 74,000 PCI procedures took place in

2006 increasing to over 84,000 in 2007 (+13.5%). It has been estimated that on average

1.5 stents are used in India per procedure. As a result over 111,000 stents were

implanted in India in 2006 and an estimated 126,600 stents will have been implanted

by the end of 2007.

Given the economic development taking place in these countries these markets

represent a massive investment opportunity with predicted compounded annual growth

rates expected to be between 20-35% over the next decade. Key features of the Chinese

PCI market structure are:

PCI is currently available in 754 hospitals among the 30 provinces and there are

more than 50 hospitals performing PCI in 4 provinces: Shandong (70), Beijing (60),

Guangdong (60) and Shanghai (50);

a total of 95 912 PCIs were performed in 2005 among the 30 provinces and about

50% of these procedures were finished in five provinces (Beijing: 20%, Shanghai:

8.9%, Shandong: 7.6%, Liaoning: 6.1% and Shanxi 6.0%;

PCI procedure numbers of more than 1000 were conducted in 7 hospitals, between

500 - 999 in 13 hospitals, between 300 - 499 in 41 hospitals, between 100 - 299 in

149 hospitals and less than 100 in more than 50% of all hospitals;

Page 48: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

48

in several regions with high Gross Domestic Product (GDP) figures such as Jiangsu

Province, Zhejiang Province, Guangdong Province, Shandong Province and Hainan

Province, the rate of PCI/total population is significantly lower than other regions

with comparable GDP and as such there is greater potential for higher PCI numbers

in the future from these regions;

an estimated 60% of all stents implanted were drug eluting stents;

in Singapore, the number of patients who underwent PCI procedures increased

from 2450 in 1999 to 3225 in 2003.

In 2004 India had a total of 86 hospitals in the country where a total of 32,665 PCI

procedures were carried out. By 2006 the number of participating centers carrying out

PCI procedures had increased to 109 with a corresponding increase in PCI procedures

to 42,123 (+28.9%). There are significant regional zone differences within India. Of the

total of 109 participating centers the Northern region of India has 23 centers (11,212

PCI procedures), the Eastern region has 5 centers (1,166 PCI procedures), the Central

region has 22 centers (6,895 PCI procedures), the Sothern region has 35 centers

(10,961 PCI procedures) and the Western region has 25 centers (11,899 PCI

procedures).

Clearly both India and China are markets which currently have significantly lower

procedural rates compared with the mature markets of North America and Europe.

However given the growth rates of their economies and subsequent structural and

financing improvements in the healthcare systems these markets represent huge

opportunities for companies who have the ability to commit resources and create

suitable sales and marketing structures in both countries.

Page 49: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

49

Table 2.4: PCI procedure rates in Selected Countries, 2005 Population Total Estimated Procedures per million (million) Procedures population (pmp) Australia 20.7 28,300 1,364 China 1,313.9 95,912 73 Czech 10.2 11,508 1,125 Estonia 1.3 421 312 Finland 5.2 7,850 1,500 France 60.0 131,665 2,194 Germany 82.6 225,500 2,765 Greece 11.2 5,828 520 Hungary 10.1 2,850 282 India 1,027.0 42,123 41 Italy 57.9 115,000 1,983 Norway 4.5 10,847 2,380 Spain 41.8 32,019 759 United States 281.4 657,000* 2,334 United Kingdom 60.2 70,142 1,165 * Data obtained from (Health Care in America: Trends in Utilization. CDC/NCHS 2003). This states that an estimated 657,000 PTCA procedures were performed on 640,000 patients in 2002 in the United States. From 1987 to 2002 the number of procedures increased 324 percent.

Source: European Heart Survey: European Society of Cardiology and the European Association of PercutaneousCardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) Business Insights Ltd

Latest Developments in PCI Procedures

Embolic Protection Devices

It is now known that atheromatous plaques are formed over time by deposition of low

density lipoprotein, calcium mineral and a variable amount of fibrous connective tissue

within the walls of arteries. This progressively reduces the diameter of the artery

lumen. As a result of the narrowing of the artery, lumen blood flow becomes

progressively restricted and situations arise where the plaque eventually may occlude

the entire lumen and cause total blood flow obstruction, leading to tissue infarction.

Plaques which have a large lipid pool, a thin fibrous cap and a high density of

macrophages (which release many things including matrix metalloproteinases) are

Page 50: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

50

known to become morphologically unstable (vulnerable plaques) and thus have a

higher tendency to rupture.

As the atheroma becomes unstable, parts of the plaque break off and embolise

downstream, leading to infarcts. One of the most significant events known to trigger

plaque embolisation is surgical or interventional removal of the atheroma. This

mechanical disruption of the plaque quite often releases a shower of emboli

downstream, with frequent intra- or post- operative complications. Recent data from

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) confirms that distal embolisation is a

relatively common event, particularly during high-risk interventions such as in cases

treating saphenous vein grafts (SVG) and acute myocardial infarctions (AMIs), and can

produce serious complications including heart attacks and strokes. This has lead to the

development of devices to help prevent periprocedural distal embolisation, known as

Embolic Protection Devices (EPDs).

Current Products

Currently there are 3 different types of cerebral embolic protection devices: filters,

distal occlusion balloons, and proximal occlusion balloons.

Distal Filter Devices

These are positioned distally to the area of treatment in order to trap the debris during

the procedure. They are the easiest to use, do not interrupt antegrade flow, and allow

for contrast injection during the procedure for lesion and arterial visualization.

Arguably the best known distal filter system is the FilterWire EZ™ Embolic Protection

System developed by Boston Scientific. This device uses a suspended loop design and

placement in curved vessels with good vessel wall apposition. The conforming filter

frame is designed to ensure reliable wall apposition in varying vessels sizes and

changes of vessel structures. The advantage with this form of system is that it maintains

flow while capturing liberated debris. Originally the safety and performance of the

FilterWire EZ System was evaluated in the CABERNET Trial in conjunction with the

recently approved NexStent® Carotid Stent and Monorail® Delivery System. Later the

Page 51: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

51

FIRE trial and BLAZE register demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the FilterWire

EX™ Embolic Protection System during angioplasty/stenting of saphenous vein grafts

comparing it to the PercuSurge GuardWire Plus® System.

The FilterWire EZ™ Embolic Protection System was cleared by the FDA in August

2004 for use in coronary saphenous vein graft (SVG) interventions. Boston Scientific

announced in the press release that the FilterWire EZ™ Embolic Protection System had

undergone a number of product modifications including a new suspended loop design,

a new pre-loaded, peel-away delivery sheath and improved delivery and lesion crossing

using a silicone coating on the spring tip. A further announcement was made by Boston

Scientific on the 14th December 2006 that they had received FDA approval to market

the FilterWire EZ™ Embolic Protection System for use in carotid artery stenting

(CAS) procedures. The FilterWire EZ™ Embolic Protection System is currently the

market-leading embolic protection device for carotid artery stenting procedures outside

the U.S.

Another well-known and renowned distal filter device known as the RX ACCUNET™

Embolic Protection System had originally been developed and marketed by Guidant for

use with the FDA-approved RX ACCULINK® Carotid Stent System. As a result of the

head lined and protracted competitive acquisition of Guidant by Boston Scientific in

April 2006 Guidant was required by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the

European Commission to comply with their antitrust laws by completing the

acquisition of Guidant’s vascular intervention and endovascular business by Abbott.

This product is currently only available in the United States. Guidant originally

designed a post-approval study of carotid artery stenting in high surgical risk patients,

called CAPTURE 2 (Carotid ACCULINK/ACCUNET Post Approval Trial to Uncover

Rare Events) in March 2006. The latest data from this and the Emboshield and Xact

Post Approval Carotid Stent Trial (EXACT) was presented at the 3rd April i2 Summit

2007. This was a program run in tandem with the American College of Cardiology

(ACC) 2007 Scientific Sessions and cosponsored by the ACC and the Society for

Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI). The results demonstrated a

“pleasing trend" with respect to reductions in death and stroke rates across the studies,

Page 52: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

52

in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Abbott Vascular continues to market

and promote both the RX ACCULINK® Carotid Stent System and the RX

ACCUNET™ Embolic Protection System in the United States.

The Rubicon Filter System (Rubicon Filter, made by Boston Scientific Corp. and

Rubicon Medical Corp.) is a third filter DPD system that includes the Constraint And

Remote Actuating Technology (CARAT(TM)) platform. Other ancillary components

supplied with the system for convenience of use include an introducer, a syringe for

flushing the capture catheter, and two torque devices. On the 14th April 2005, the

European Commission approved for use in the European Union (EU) an embolic

protection system (Rubicon Filter, made by Boston Scientific Corp. and Rubicon

Medical Corp.) for the prevention of distal embolization in saphenous vein graft

(SVG), native coronary artery, and carotid artery interventional procedures. Two

separate trials were conducted to determine the safety and efficiency of the product in

Europe. The RULE-SVG study involved 54 patients with either SVG or native

coronary artery disease and included a number of high-risk stenting procedures. The

second trial was the RULE-Carotid study, where the device was employed in 60

patients with significantly blocked carotid arteries.

The device has not been approved by the FDA; its application in SVG procedures is

currently being investigated in U.S. clinical studies.

A fourth system has been developed by EV3 Inc and is known as the SpiderFX™

Embolic Protection Device. The SpiderFX™ Embolic Protection Device is indicated

for use in removing embolic material (thrombus/debris) while performing angioplasty

and stenting procedures in carotid arteries and in coronary saphenous vein bypass

grafts. It is available in both the US and Internationally. EV3 Inc announced on the 27th

January 2007 that the new carotid stent the Protégé® RX had been approved by the

U.S. Food and Drug Administration for marketing in the U.S. The Protégé is a self-

expanding Nitinol stent which is part of a carotid stent system when paired with eV3's

SpideRX® Embolic Protection Device.

Page 53: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

53

On the 8th January 2007 EV3 announced that they and FoxHollow Technologies, Inc.

had entered into an agreement to conduct a joint clinical study of FoxHollow's calcium

cutting device (The RockHawk) and ev3's SpideRX endovascular devices to seek

approval for the treatment of calcified lesions in peripheral artery disease. As part of

the agreement, FoxHollow will have the exclusive right to market the two devices

together in the United States. The RockHawk device, currently under development, is a

specialized version of FoxHollow's SilverHawk(R) Plaque Excision System that is

optimized for the treatment of calcified lesions in the peripheral arteries.

On the 3rd April 2007 EV3 announced that they have entered into a joint marketing and

distribution agreement with Volcano Corporation. Under the terms of the agreement,

Volcano will have the opportunity to sell ev3's SpiderFX Embolic Protection Device in

conjunction with their Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) and Functional Measurement

(FM) devices for use in saphenous vein grafts (SVG's) in the U.S.

Distal Balloon Occlusive Devices

Distal balloon occlusive devices temporarily occlude the vessel distally to the lesion

during the intervention, thereby capturing and aspirating the atheromatous and

thrombotic debris liberated by the lesion before it reaches the capillary bed. Distal

balloon occlusion embolic protection devices typically consist of a hollow wire with an

inflatable occlusion balloon at the distal tip. The balloon is inflated to occlude the

artery distal to the treated lesion, where embolic particles are captured and removed

either via an aspiration catheter, or flushing toward the external carotid artery. The

main advantage with such devices is complete protection by capturing particles of all

sizes. In addition, distal balloon systems usually have a smaller crossing profile and are

more flexible than distal filter systems; however, the interruption of blood flow during

protection, while tolerated by most, may lead to complications in some patients.

The largest experience with distal protection devices comes from the PercuSurge-

GuideWire, an occlusive balloon device. The PercuSurge-GuideWire was

commercially released in the United States in June 2001 and had been commercially

Page 54: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

54

available in Europe since 1999. Percusurge Inc was acquired by Medtronic in October

2000 for $225 million and has since been discontinued and replaced by the Guardwire

Temporary Occlusion and Aspiration System from Medtronic.

Another system emerging as a market leader is the TriActiv FX® Embolic Protection

System manufactured and marketed by Kensey Nash. In December 2001, Kensey Nash

announced commencement of the 50-site, 800-patient ‘Protection During Saphenous

Vein Graft Intervention to Prevent Distal Embolization (PRIDE)’ randomized trial for

its TriActiv Balloon Protected Flush Extraction System. In January 2002, the company

received CE-Mark approval for the device, allowing its sale within the EU. In March

2005 Kensey Nash began enrolling patients into the ASPIRE (Angioplasty in SVGs

with Post Intervention Removal of Embolic Debris). The enrollment was completed in

November 2005. In March 2006 Kensey Nash announced the results of this trial at the

American College of Cardiology (ACC) conference in Atlanta, Georgia. In January of

the same year Kensey Nash Corporation submitted a 510(k) application to the U.S.

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the new TriActiv FX(R) System. In July

2006 Kensey Nash announced that it has received 510(k) clearance for the next

generation TriActiv FX(R) Embolic Protection System from FDA.

Proximal Balloon Occlusive Devices

These temporarily occlude the vessel proximally to the lesion during the intervention.

Proximal occlusion balloons with flow reversal are placed before the lesion is accessed

and are therefore the only type of device that allows crossing of the stenosis under

protection.

ArteriA Medical Science developed the Parodi Anti-Emboli System (PAES), which

had been marketed throughout Europe under CE-Mark approval for the prevention of

cerebral embolization during peripheral angioplasty and stenting procedures. Contrary

to distal balloon occlusion systems, the unique PAES proximal balloon occlusion

device never had to cross the lesion without protection already in place. On November

18th 2004 Gore Medical announced that they had acquired all of the assets of ArteriA

Page 55: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

55

Medical Systems. The Parodi Anti-Emboli System (PAES) was replaced by the GORE

Neuro Protection System, also developed by Dr Juan Parodi, and in July 2006 Gore

announced that they had started to enroll patients into the EMPiRE (Embolic Protection

with flow Reversal) Clinical Study.

A second proximal balloon protection device known as The Mo.Ma Proximal Flow

Blockage Cerebral Protection Device from the Italian company Invatec is another

example of a proximal balloon occlusive device. The Mo.Ma protects the brain from

embolization by two highly compliant atraumatic balloons, blocking antegrade blood

flow from the CCA (Common Carotid Artery) and retrograde blood flow from the ECA

(External Carotid Artery).

A third example of a proximal balloon protection device is the Proxis (TM) embolic

protection device from St Jude Medical. The Proxis Embolic Protection System was

originally developed by Velocimed, LLC ("Velocimed"), a privately-owned company

located in Maple Grove, Minnesota. Velocimed, LLC was acquired by St Jude Medical

in early 2005 and on the 23rd May 2005 they announced the launch of the Premere(TM)

PFO closure device, the Proxis(TM) embolic protection device, and the Venture(TM)

wire control catheter at the EuroPCR 2005 meeting in Paris, France.

The Proxis(TM) embolic protection device is currently under review by the U.S. Food

and Drug Administration (FDA) and was included in a study known as the

PROXIMAL Embolic Protection Trial. The PROMIXAL trial assessed whether Proxis

was substantially equivalent to previously-cleared devices as determined by the rate of

major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days, the primary endpoint of the trial.

Proxis proved equivalent to previously-cleared devices.

Development Stage Products and Current Status

Liquid Embolism Protection Technologies or Occlusive Gels (Gore Medical)

Page 56: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

56

W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. (Gore) announced on the 7th July that they had acquired

Neural Intervention Technologies, Inc. a medical device company developing a novel

liquid embolic material for the treatment of blood vessel defects.

NIT was founded in 2003 based on the ALGEL™ technology developed by Drs.

Timothy Becker and Daryl Kipke and licensed from the University of Michigan and

AzTE, a technology transfer company for Arizona State University. The ALGEL

product now known as the GORE Embolic Liquid (GEL) is an alginate based embolic

material designed to fill blood vessel defects thereby displacing blood pressure effects

and preventing vessel rupture. The material is delivered by microcatheters using a

controlled delivery system for the treatment of vascular diseases such as cerebral

Arteriovenous Malformations (AVMs) and aneurysms

Gore Medical announced on the 20th December 2006 that they had successfully treated

the first patient using the GORE Embolic Liquid (GEL) in the MAGELAN trial

(prospective Multicentre feAsibility trial to evaluate the safety and performance of

Gore Embolic Liquid used in presurgical embolisation of cerebral arteriovenous

malformatioN). The first phase of the study is expected to include ten to twenty five

patients and is designed to demonstrate the safety and performance of the liquid.

AEPD (MIV Therapeutics Inc)

On the 18th March 2005 MIV Therapeutics, Inc. a developer of next-generation

biocompatible coatings and drug delivery technologies, announced that they executed

an agreement to acquire SagaX Medical Technologies Inc. SagaX Medical

Technologies Inc., a research and development centre in Herzliya, Israel had been

developing a proprietary Aortic Embolic Protection Device (AEPD). The AEPD filters

the blood in the aorta - one of the main arteries directing blood to the brain -- capturing

embolic particles originating in the heart released during heart surgery and other

invasive cardiology procedures. This filtration prevents the embolic particles from

traveling upstream in the direction of the patient's brain.

Page 57: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

57

On March 10th 2006 MIV Therapeutics Inc announced that based on the favorable

preclinical studies conducted after the acquisition of SagaX Medical Technologies Inc

it had accelerated development of AEPD device for surgical patients. At that time MIV

Therapeutics Inc through its SagaX subsidiary were seeking to have the device ready

for clinical use within 14 months, subject to regulatory approval.

In August 2006 MIV Therapeutics, Inc were invited to present their Aortic Embolic

Protection Device (AEPD) technology to the 18th Annual Scientific Symposium of

Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) October 2006.

FiberNet® Embolic Protection System (Lumen Biomedical)

In July 2003 Lumen Biomedical, Inc. was founded with the goal of developing and

commercializing a unique and improved embolic protection device known as the

FiberNet® Embolic Protection System. The FiberNet® Embolic Protection system

consists of an expandable filter mounted on a 0.014” wire, along with a rapid exchange

focal-suction retrieval catheter. The filter is composed of numerous strands of polymer

fibers, bundled to form a cartridge. When the device is deployed, the filter strands flare

out radially, seeks the vessel wall and completely fills the vessel. The filter fibers are of

sufficient density to efficiently trap very small particulate matter (≥40 microns), while

simultaneously allowing blood flow. Upon completion of the intervention, the filter is

brought down and retracted into the focal-suction retrieval catheter.

This product is currently only available for investigational use, and a number of clinical

trials are underway to determine the safety and efficacy of the product. These trials

include The EPIC European Study, The EPIC US Feasibility Study, The RETRIEVE

European Study, the New Zealand Multi-Center Clinical Embolic Protection Device

Trial (NET) and the Novel Embolic protection Trial - Peripheral Vasculature (NET-

PV). Enrollment for these studies is presently underway, and once completed larger

pivotal studies will be instigated.

Watchman (Atritech)

Page 58: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

58

Atritech is an emerging medical device company focused on preventing atrial

fibrillation (AF) related stroke through technology. Atritech is currently conducting a

pivotal study of the WATCHMAN® system in the United States known as the

PROTECT AF Study (Protect AF - WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage System for

Embolic PROTECTion in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation). The PROTECT AF study

has been designed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the WATCHMAN® device

in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who require treatment for potential

thrombus formation. In addition participants must be eligible for warfarin therapy and

who have at least one of the following risk factors: Congestive heart failure,

Hypertension, Age 75+ years, Diabetes mellitus and/or prior Stroke or TIA. Currently

this study is in Phase III and is due for completion in 2008.

The WATCHMAN® left atrial appendage system is made of nitinol (a self expanding

metal) with the atrial facing surface covered with a thin permeable polyester material.

The device is constrained within a catheter until delivery in the LAA and is available in

multiple sizes to accommodate the unique anatomy of each patient.

Future Technologies and Trends

While embolic protection devices are quickly becoming standard of care for carotid

artery stenting and interventions for degenerated saphenous vein grafts, their full

potential is likely to be realized if they can be used successfully for acute coronary

syndrome (ACS). Several issues may need to be addressed in greater detail before these

devices can be used routinely for ACS interventions. For example, how effective will

these devices be to capture microemboli smaller than 100 um? What are the risks of

inducing vessel injury when introducing the devices through small caliber coronaries?

Regardless of these and other questions, DPDs represent an exciting, useful new

technology, and refinements to existing DPDs will continue to expand their use in

interventional cardiology.

Page 59: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

59

Coronary Atherectomy

These procedures are sometimes used in during angioplasty to help clear plaque as an

adjunct to balloon angioplasty and stenting. There are a number of technologies

currently available as follows:

Rotational Coronary Atherectomy (Rotoblation)

These devices consist of a special catheter, with an acorn-shaped, diamond-coated tip

(the burr) which is guided to the point of narrowing in your coronary artery over a thin

guide wire and is driven by an air turbine. The tip spins at a high speed and grinds

away the plaque on your artery walls. The microscopic particles are washed safely

away into blood stream and filtered out by your liver and spleen. This process is

repeated as needed to allow for better blood flow. The RotaLink® Plus System from

Boston Scientific Corporation is the dominant product in the market.

Another device known as the SilverHawk® Plaque Excision System (Foxhollow) is a

device used to remove plaque that commonly blocks arteries and interrupts blood flow.

Unlike stenting and other methods of opening the artery, the SilverHawk removes the

source of the problem – plaque build-up – instead of simply compressing it against the

vessel wall. The SilverHawk® Plaque Excision System is available in both Europe and

the United States.

Directional Coronary Atherectomy (DCA)

These devices allow the cutting of plaque from a blocked artery to restore blood flow.

Often this method is used when plaque is too hard to use a balloon angioplasty. In a

directional coronary artherectomy, the catheter tip is equipped with a bladed device

that cuts away the plaque and stores the little pieces in a tiny container. The plaque is

removed when the catheter is withdrawn from the artery. This technique also is useful

in larger arteries with "softer" plaque. The FLEXI-CUT Directional Debulking System

is the newest DCA from Abbott Vascular.

Page 60: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

60

Orbital Atherectomy

Orbital atherectomy technology is the proprietary technologies of Cardiovascular

Systems Inc. The device consists of an eccentrically shaped wire coil that rotates a

diamond-coated ablating crown at high speed in an orbital path around the periphery of

the lumen. Use of an orbital rather than rotational motion creates lateral pressure

between the atherosclerotic plaque and the ablating crown, thereby minimizing the risk

of deep vascular injury that is associated with other transluminal interventions.

The design also allows blood and saline to flow through the treatment area, thereby

minimizing the risk of thermal trauma and ischemia.

In January 2005 CSI received clearance from the FDA to market the orbital

atherectomy system (OAS) for the purpose of treating stenosis in synthetic

arteriovenous shunts, used to provide vascular access for dialysis patients. On May 19

2005, the European Commission approved a peripheral atherectomy device (Orbital,

made by Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.) for the treatment of peripheral artery disease in

countries within the EU.

Ablative laser-assisted angioplasty

During the 1980s, a variety of different laser types were examined to determine their

efficacy and safety for use in coronary angioplasty. The first two lasers examined were

Argon (514 nm) and Nd:YAG (neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet) (1060 nm)

continuous wave lasers. These lasers were used to destroy atherosclerotic lesions

primarily via non-specific thermal action; in essence they burn the lesion.

Unfortunately, both argon and Nd:YAG continuous wave induced considerable thermal

damage to surrounding vessel tissue.

Since then an alternative laser technology, the excimer laser has been used for the

ablation of obstructive coronary lesions. Its active medium is composed of rare gas

halides (binary halogens) that emit light in the ultra-violet spectrum. The laser-light

energy forces electrons from atoms, splitting chemical bonds. Thus the atherosclerotic

Page 61: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

61

lesion is destroyed in a photoablative rather than a thermal fashion. Fortunately, ultra-

violet excimer lasers have proved more effective at clearing coronary lesions than other

lasers evaluated, and are associated with little corollary thermal damage. Results from

the use of excimer lasers have been encouraging but not altogether satisfactory. There

have been reported improvements to the outcomes of complex lesions but others have

reported serious complications, predominantly related to the damage of neighboring,

healthy vessel tissue.

The Spectranetics CVX-300® excimer laser system is an example of a photoablative

technology system. It is used to treat complex cardiovascular disease by ablating

plaque, thrombus and calcium into tiny particles that are easily absorbed into the blood

stream. The disposable catheters use high-energy “cool” ultraviolet light to remove

arterial blockages in the legs and heart, as well as the scar tissue holding problematic

cardiac leads in place, reducing complications and improving clinical outcomes. The

Spectranetics excimer laser system is the only excimer laser system approved in the

United States and Europe for use in multiple, minimally invasive cardiovascular

applications.

Page 62: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

62

Page 63: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

63

CHAPTER 3

EMERGING CORONARY STENTS AND STENT SYSTEMS

Page 64: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

64

Chapter 3 Emerging Coronary Stents and Stent Systems

Summary

Current estimates show that 95.9% of all PCI procedures in 2006 included a coronary stent of one sort or another (BMS or DES).

The world-wide market for coronary stents was valued at $6.18 billion in 2006, with a projected value of $13.34 billion by the year 2013 (CAGR 11.6%).

The worldwide market for DES’s has been valued at $5.14 billion in 2006, and is expected to increase to $12.40 billion by the year 2013 (CAGR 13.4%). The world market for BMS’s is currently valued at $1.04 billion but is expected to decline in value to $0.94 billion by the end of the forecast period (CAGR –1.4%).

There are now four major manufacturers of coronary stents. These are Cordis (Johnson & Johnson), Boston Scientific Corporation, Medtronic and Abbott Laboratories (Abbott Vascular).

There are concerns amongst clinicians about a number of problems or complications associated with drug-eluting stents. These complications are primarily concerned with late developing stent thrombosis (LDST), allergic inflammatory reactions, long term antiplatelet therapy and non-compliance.

Recent Developments include the use of bioabsorbable stents from poly L-lactic acid (PLLA). Several stent designs have been built using PLLA mono filaments and appear to be a viable alternative to metal in some preliminary studies.

Other novel technological developments include Absorbable Metal Stent (AMS) Technologies, the development of novel coating technologies, gene therapy technologies and its potential use to prevent restenosis, coronary stents and Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPCs), nanotechnologies and drug-eluting coronary stents, development of novel Estradiol containing drug-eluting stents, development of regenerative stents using stem-cell derived endovascular cells.

Page 65: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

65

Emerging Coronary Stents and Stent Systems

Key Events

The term “stent” originated from the English dentist Charles Stent in the 19th Century

after he developed a mold with which he formed an impression of the teeth and oral

cavity. The term "stent" later became associated with a device that held a skin graft in

position, a support for tubular structures that were being anastomosed, and more

recently, an endovascular scaffolding to relieve and prevent vascular obstructions. In

1964 Charles Dotter developed the concept of using a prosthetic device which would

maintain the integrity of the lumen of diseased vessels.

Despite the poor results of the original non surgical developments Charles Dotter

developed some new devices in the 1980s made from "memory metal" nitinol. The

potential for the use of such a device in the nonsurgical treatment of vascular disease

had become self-evident, and experimentation with a variety of innovative devices

started. The concept of a stent mounted on a balloon was introduced by Palmaz in 1985

when he implanted woven stainless steel grafts mounted on angioplasty balloon

catheters into dogs. Jacques Puel in Toulouse, France, and shortly afterward Ulrich

Sigwart in Lausanne, Switzerland, implanted the first stents in human coronary arteries

in 1986; between 1987 through 1989 Schatz maintained a multicenter registry of

elective Palmaz-Schatz stent implantations in native coronary arteries.

The first coronary stent to be approved for clinical use was Cook’s Gianturco-Roubin

Stent (GRS). Its approved indication for use was not for the prevention of restenosis,

but for the prevention of abrupt closure of an artery following balloon angioplasty.

Abrupt closure is the sudden collapse and constriction of an artery shortly after

removal of the angioplasty balloon, resulting in complete blockage of blood flow in the

vessel. This condition occurs in 2-10% of all angioplasty procedures.

Page 66: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

66

Prior to the introduction of stents, abrupt closure generally necessitated emergency

bypass surgery. The Cook GRS stent, which employed a coil design, was effective in

preventing abrupt closure, but at least based on the results of early experience with the

device did not reduce restenosis to a clinically significant degree. The Palmaz-Schatz

slotted-tube stent, developed by Johnson & Johnson Interventional Systems, was

shown to produce a clinically significant reduction in restenosis. Results from the

ongoing STRESS trial demonstrated that patients receiving the Palmaz-Schatz stent

experienced a restenosis rate of only 15% versus a rate of 30% for patients treated with

balloon angioplasty alone. Based on the results of that study, the Palmaz-Schatz stent

was rapidly adopted throughout Europe and the U.S. for reducing the rate of restenosis

following balloon angioplasty. Since the early to mid 1990s a diverse variety of stents

have become clinically available, varying in composition, configuration, and size.

These included the Wallstent, Palmaz-Schatz stent, Wiktor stent, Gianturco-Roubin

stent, Cordis stent, AVE stent, and multilink stent.

Stents are made from metal, and in every design, a compromise is made between

scaffolding properties and flexibility. Metals induce a varying degree of

thrombogenesis, necessitating anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy, and induce

significant intimal hyperplasia; both factors that discourage the use of stents in small

vessels or in situations of diminished flow. Furthermore, the long-term effects of a

metallic prosthesis within the vascular system, although seemingly benign, are

unknown.

Some of the developments that occurred during the late 1990s included the

investigation of surface charge and texture of stents by galvanization and ion

bombardment. Palmaz-Schatz stents coated with platinum, gold, and copper alter both

the surface charge and texture, consequently affecting the surface charge and texture.

Similarly developments took place examining the development of stents made of

materials that can be degraded or absorbed. Bioabsorbable polymers may for example

help avoid the potential for late complications and thus have the potential to prevent

elastic recoil, thrombosis, neointimal proliferation, and systemic side effects.

Page 67: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

67

However, in spite of these developments the major problem encountered with modern

coronary stents is that of in-stent restenosis due to the proliferation of intimal tissues

within the stent which can lead to the necessity of reintervention. Current rates of in-

stent restenosis are between 15-25 percent. Management of in-stent restenosis has been

difficult, and as more complex lesions are now being treated, the magnitude of the

problem has become a source of concern among cardiologists. Recent technological

advancements such as intravascular brachytherapy and drug-eluting stents—developed

specifically for the prevention of in-stent restenosis—indicate that this problem also

will eventually be resolved, removing any remaining barriers to widespread adoption of

stents for CAD treatment.

Introduction of Drug-Eluting Stents (DES)

Considerable advances have been made since the late 1990s into resolving the problem

of restenosis and research focused on the use of pharmaceuticals rather than purely

mechanical devices as a means of reducing the incidence of restoisis. The concept is to

combine the principle of mechanical scaffolding (stent) with that of local

pharmacological action (drug). The ultimate goal is to provide a controlled, local

release of an efficient drug that inhibits the development of neointimal hyperplasia

from the stent surface. This research led to the creation of stents known as Drug-

Eluting Stents (DES) which deliver prolonged and sufficient drug concentrations to

overcome the problems associated with restenosis. There are three distinct components

of a DES system which need to be compatible with each other in order to work

properly i.e. the stent that carried the drug coating, the carrier vehicle (polymer) and

the drug. The various drugs have been incorporated into stents, or "active" stents.

Categories can be divided into: (i) anti-inflammatories, (ii)metalloproteinase inhibitors,

(iii) NO donors, (iv) anti-sclerosing agents, (v) antiproliferatives, (vi) anti-neoplastics

and (vii) “molecular” approaches (genes, cells, antisense).

The emergence of drug-eluting stents as a breakthrough technology has been heralded

as the dawning of a new era of cardiovascular treatments, and since their introduction

have had a dramatic impact on the growth and development of coronary stents

worldwide. Figure 2.2 illustrates the market development of Bare Metal Stents (BMSs)

Page 68: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

68

throughout the 1990s and the impact on the market following the launch of Drug-

Eluting Stents (DESs) at the beginning of the new millenium as a percentage of the

total number of PCI procedures in Europe.

Current estimates show that in 2006 95.9% of all PCI procedures included a coronary

stent of one sort or another (BMS or DES). The proportion of drug-eluting stents had

increased from 2.6% in 2002 to 68.9% in 2006. It is anticipated that by 2012, given the

current market knowledge and the development in the structure of the coronary stent

marketplace, drug-eluting stents will be used in approximately 79.8% of PCI

procedures in Europe. These predictions are based on the following assumptions; drug-

eluting stents continue to provide proven efficacy in clinical trials and reduce the level

of restenosis compared to those highlighted in earlier trials, suitable funding is made

available through the national healthcare reimbursement structures, drug-eluting stents

become more readily accepted amongst interventional cardiologists as the method of

choice, and there is increased product choice from companies obtaining marketing

approval in Europe.

Page 69: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

69

Figure 3.4: Estimated number of Stent Procedures (BMS & DES) % Total Number of PTCA Procedures

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

*

2008

*

2009

*

2010

*

2011

*

2012

*

% o

f Pro

cedu

res

% + Stent BMS DES

Source: British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS), European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and National Cardiovascular Societies Business Insights Ltd

* Estimate

Page 70: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

70

Development of Drug-Eluting Stents

A large number of clinical trails/studies have been, and continue to be, conducted to

determine both the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents. Specifically, initial

studies have been conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of sirolimus and

paclitaxel-eluting stents.

Sirolimus (Rapamycin)

Sirolimus (rapamycin) occurs naturally and is a macrocyclic lactone with a potent

immunosuppressive action. It inhibits cellular proliferation by blocking cell cycle

progression in the G1-S interphase. The first published pilot trial of a sirolimus-coated

stent in humans was the First in Man (FIM) study. This was conducted in São Paulo,

Brazil on thirty consecutive patients. Each patient received a single 18-mm sirolimus-

coated BX Velocity stent (Cordis Corp.). Each stent contained sirolimus 140 µg/cm[2]

blended with a mixture of nonerodable polymers. Fifteen patients received a fast-

release formulation (< 15-day drug release), and 15 patients received a slow-release

formulation (>/= 28-day release). An additional 15 patients in Rotterdam, The

Netherlands, received the slow-release formulation.

The first-in-man study was quickly followed by the RAVEL trial (RAndomized study

with the sirolimus-eluting Bx VELocityTM balloon expandable stent), a multicenter,

larger-scale trial designed to determine the safety and efficacy of the use of sirolimus-

eluting versus uncoated stainless steel stents in patients with de novo coronary lesions.

The FIM and RAVEL trials were then followed by the SIRIUS trial (SIRolImUS-

Coated BX Velocity Balloon-Expandable Stent in the Treatment of Patients with De

Novo Coronary Artery Lesions) and the European equivalent known as the E-SIRIUS

Study.

The DIRECT trial, supported by Cordis (J&J) compared the results of “direct stenting”

(stent placement without balloon pre-dilation) with those obtained using conventional

balloon pre-dilatation in the Sirius trial. In March 2004, results of the DIRECT trial

Page 71: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

71

showed that the Cypher sirolimus-eluting coronary stent yields the same strong patient

outcomes with or without balloon pre-dilatation. In April 2002, Cordis received CE

mark approval to market its Cypher Select sirolimus-eluting coronary stent in the EU,

and gained FDA approval for the treatment of in-stent restenosis in the United States

on April 24th 2003.

Paclitaxel

A naturally occuring antitumour drug, Paclitaxel is a microtubule-stabilizing agent. It

induces abnormal polymerization of tubulin, forming stable but dysfunctional

microtubules - thereby blocking the mitotic cycle at the metaphase/anaphase transition.

A number of trials have been conducted to determine the efficacy of Paclitaxel. The

TAXUS I study was the first experience with a paclitaxel-eluting stent in humans. The

objective of this trial was to compare the safety of the TAXUS® NIR® Paclitaxel-

Eluting Stent to uncoated control NIR® Stent. The original TAXUS I study included a

total of sixty-one patients who were randomized to either a single 15-mm TAXUS

NIRx paclitaxel-eluting stent (Boston Scientific Corporation) or a similar stent (NIR

stent; Medinol Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel) without drug. This was followed by a series of

other TAXUS studies. Based on the results of this study the TAXUS™ paclitaxel-

eluting coronary stent system was launched by Boston Scientific in Europe during

February 2003. This was followed by an announcement that Boston Scientific

Corporation had received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

to market the TAXUS™ Express2™ paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent system in the

United States on the 4th March 2004. Boston Scientific Corporation announced on the

3rd April 2007 that they had received approval from the Japanese Ministry of Health,

Labor and Welfare (MHLW) to market the TAXUS® Express2™ paclitaxel-eluting

coronary stent system in Japan. The Company plans to launch the product after

reimbursement approval is granted.

Other key clinical trials used to determine the safety and efficacy of Paclitaxel include

the ASPECT (ASian Paclitaxel-Eluting stent Clinical Trial) trial. This was used to

evaluate a different type of paclitaxel-eluting stent than that used in the TAXUS trials

Page 72: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

72

where no polymer was used to adhere paclitaxel to the stent. The ELUTES (The

European Evaluation of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent) study was used to evaluate the

efficacy and safety of a nonpolymer paclitaxel-eluting stent using either the V Flex

Plus bare metal stent (Cook Inc.) as a control or one of four doses of paclitaxel: 0.2

µg/mm, 0.7 µg/mm, 1.4 µg/mm, or 2.7 µg/mm. Subsequent to this trial the paclitaxel V

Flex Plus PTX stent (Cook Inc.) has been approved for use in Europe. Due to patent

issues there are currently no plans to market the V Flex Plus PTX stent in the United

States.

The DELIVER clinical trial, a randomized U.S-based study comparing the paclitaxel-

coated ACHIEVE™ Drug Eluting Coronary Stent System manufactured by Cook

Incorporated to the PENTA™ Coronary Stent manufactured by Guidant. Cook

Incorporated's ACHIEVE™ paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent System, which is used

to reduce the rate at which arteries reclog following angioplasty, received its CE Mark

approval for sale in Europe on the 3rd September 2002. On the 5th September 2002, just

a few days after receiving clearance to sell its ACHIEVE™ Drug Eluting Stent System

in Europe, Cook® received CE Mark approval to market its paclitaxel-coated V-Flex™

Plus PTX Coronary Stent System in the European Union.

Tacrolimus

Tacrolimus, a macrolide hydrophobic immunosupressant, anti-inflammatory and

topical immunodilator has been found to inhibit Neo intimal proliferation. Tacrolimus

inhibits the proliferation of smooth muscle cells with higher potency than endothelial

cells, thus allowing the rapid integration of the stent into the vessel wall. Tacrolimus is

being used in two studies being conducted by JOMED N.V. These trials are PRESENT

(The Preliminary Safety Evaluation of Nanoporous Tacrolimus eluting stents) which

was started in January 2002 and EVIDENT (The Endovascular Investigation

Determining the Safety of New Tacroliomus-eluting stent studying sephanous vein

graft stenosis) started in September 2002. Abbott acquired the assets of JOMED N.V’s

coronary and peripheral interventional business for approximately $68 million in cash

in 2003 and subsequently in early 2006 Abbott agreed to acquire Guidant’s

interventional vascular and endovascular solutions businesses for $4.1 billion in

Page 73: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

73

connection with Boston Scientific’s acquisition of Guidant. Abbott would also pay

$250 million each upon government approvals to market Guidant’s drug-eluting stent

in the U.S. and in Japan.

Everolimus (RAD-001)

Everolimus is a relatively new mTOR (mammalian Target of Rapamycin) inhibitor

drug used as an immunosuppressant to prevent rejection of organ transplants. It, along

with other mTOR inhibitors, is used as a cancer suppressing drug. It is related to

sirolimus (Rapamycin), and works in the same way. The first trial carried out to

determine the efficacy of everolimus was known as FUTURE 1 (The First Use to

Underscore Reduction in Restenosis with Everolimus trial). This trial showed

impressive reductions in late in-stent lumen loss and restenosis in 42 patients who all

received the everolimus-coated Challenge stent (Biosensors International USA,

Newport Beach CA). A further trial known as FUTURE II was also conducted to

compare the everolimus-eluting stent against bare metal stents. A trial known as

SPIRIT FIRST was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an everolimus-

eluting cobalt chromium coronary stent among patients with a single de novo coronary

lesion. The results were presented at the 2005 Cardiovascular Research Therapeutics

Sessions, Washington D.C. Further large-scale pivotal clinical trials known as SPIRIT

II and SPIRIT III were conducted to compare XIENCE V to the TAXUS paclitaxel

eluting coronary stent system. 6 month results of these trials were presented at the

European Society of Cardiology Scientific Congress in September 2006. Twelve-

month results from SPIRIT II and nine-month results from SPIRIT III will be presented

in the first half of 2007.

Zotarolimus (also called ABT-578)

Zotarolimus is a patent-protected compound licensed to Medtronic by Abbott

Laboratories. Zotarolimus inhibits smooth muscle cell proliferation – believed to be a

key contributor to restenosis, or the reclogging of arteries – by blocking the function of

the cell cycle regulatory protein mTOR. By inhibiting the mTOR function, zotarolimus

blocks progression of the cell cycle, potentially inhibiting the growth of new tissue.

Page 74: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

74

Medtronic have conducted a number of trials under the name of ENDEAVOR. The first

trial, ENDEAVOR I began in 2003 and was conducted at sites in Australia and New

Zealand. Preliminary ENDEAVOR I 12-month results were released in May at

EuroPCR in Paris and final 12-month results were released in August 2004 at the

European Society of Cardiologists (ESC) in Munich.

The ENDEAVOR II Pivotal Clinical Trial completed enrollment of 1,200 patients in

January 2004. ENDEAVOR II is a randomized, double-blind trial that evaluated the

safety and efficacy of the Endeavor Drug-Eluting Coronary Stent compared to the

Driver™ cobalt alloy stent and will support product approvals in various countries.

Thirty-day results from the trial were released at EuroPCR in May 2004 and the 8/9-

month data was presented at the American College of Cardiology (ACC) meeting in

March 2005 and at PCR in May 2005.

The ENDEAVOR III Clinical Trial completed enrollment in September 2004 and is a

confirmatory, randomized trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Endeavor Drug

Eluting Coronary Stent as compared to the Cypher™ Sirolimus-eluting stent marketed

by Cordis Corporation.

DES – Recent News, Product Developments and Clinical Trial Updates

The market for drug-eluting stents continues to evolve through research and

development into new and innovative technologies by both the market leaders and new

start-up companies using clinical trials to provide proof of safety and efficacy. This

includes the extension of existing trials to substantiate the results of previous studies,

determine the long-term safety of drug-eluting stents as well as initiating new trials to

evaluate new products. Some of the recent product developments and clinical trial

updates are provided below.

The results of the large-scale pivotal clinical trials known as SPIRIT II (European

AND Asia-Pacific) and SPIRIT III (United States and Japan) comparing XIENCE V to

the TAXUS paclitaxel eluting coronary stent system were presented at the American

Page 75: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

75

College of Cardiology’s 56th Annual Scientific Session in New Orleans in March

2007. The results showed a statistically significant reduction in major adverse cardiac

events (MACE) favoring XIENCE V to the TAXUS. SPIRIT IV is currently enrolling

patients and will evaluate the safety and efficacy of XIENCE V for the treatment of

coronary artery disease in a more complex patient population in the United States.

SPIRIT V is an international clinical trial that will provide additional clinical

experience with XIENCE V in approximately 3,000 patients at 100 clinical sites

throughout Europe, Asia, Canada and Latin America. SPIRIT WOMEN is the world’s

first drug-eluting stent trial to study only women and will evaluate the characteristics of

women undergoing stent implantation as well as the performance of XIENCE V in

those patients in Europe, Asia-Pacific, Canada and Latin America.

On the 1st September 2006 Boston Scientific Corporation announced that they were

planning to launch the Abbott's XIENCE™ V Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent

System (distributed by Boston Scientific as the PROMUS Stent) internationally

through a distribution agreement established between Abbott Vascular and Boston

Scientific Corporation. The PROMUS Stent received CE Mark approval in October

2006 allowing Boston Scientific to distribute the stent in select countries of the

European Economic Area. It will also be available in selected countries in Asia, Latin

America and Eastern Europe. Pending U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

approval, the PROMUS Stent is expected to become available in the United States in

the first half of 2008.

Medtronic recently announced that it has received reimbursement approval in France

for the Endeavor® drug-eluting coronary stent (DES) system. The announcement was

made following publication in the official French government journal, “Journal Officiel

de la République Française,” on June 8, 2006. The company said the stent will be

available June 21 to public and private hospitals throughout France, providing

physicians and patients with a clinically-proven option for the treatment of coronary

artery disease in one of the largest DES markets in Europe. The Endeavor stent is not

yet available in the United States. However, Medtronic filed its first Pre-Market

Approval module with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration last October and the

Page 76: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

76

company expects FDA approval in mid-2007 based on the results of the ENDEAVOR

IV study. The Endeavor stent has been commercially available in most of Europe and

in many other international markets since August 2005. Medtronic subsequently

announced in October 2006 that it would begin a new, large-scale clinical trial focusing

on the safety of drug-eluting stents. This trial known as PROTECT (Patient Related

OuTcomes with Endeavor versus Cypher stenting Trial) will be the largest randomized

stent trial ever conducted to assess and compare key safety measures of two drug-

eluting stents. The trial will compare the Medtronic Endeavor® zotarolimus-eluting

coronary stent system and the Johnson & Johnson Cypher® sirolimus-eluting stent.

Medtronic has reaffirmed its commitment to the drug-eluting market through the

development of its second generation drug-eluting stent the Endeavor RESOLUTE.

The Endeavor RESOLUTE is a zotarolimus-eluting stent system incorporating a

proprietary, new biocompatible polymer called BioLinx. Medtronic announced on the

25th October 2006 that the results of the first-in-man study of the RESOLUTE stent

system had proven positive

On the 22nd July 2004 Boston Scientific Corporation announced they had received an

Investigational Device Exemption from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

to begin its ATLAS clinical trial. ATLAS was the first clinical trial using Boston

Scientific's new Liberté coronary stent as a platform for its paclitaxel-eluting coronary

stent system.

Conor Medsystems (now part of Johnson and Johnson) announced on the 11th May

2006 that they had initiated the RAPID (Reduced Anti-platelet therapy with

Pimecrolimus Drug-eluting stent) clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the

company's pimecrolimus-eluting cobalt chromium coronary stent system, known as

Corio™. Pimecrolimus, which was in-licensed by Conor from Novartis Pharma AG in

March 2006, is a cell-selective inhibitor of the production and release of pro-

inflammatory cytokines. Inflammation is believed to be one of the key mechanisms

causing restenosis, or the excess proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells, as well

as other vascular diseases such as unstable plaques and diabetic lesions. Because

Page 77: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

77

pimecrolimus is not an anti-mitotic compound, it is believed not to inhibit re-

endothelialization, or the growth of the endothelial cells that line the interior surface

and maintain the healthy functioning of blood vessels.

Market Developments and Forecasts for Drug-Eluting Stents

Figure 2.3 provides an analysis of the actual and predicted revenue growth for coronary

stents in the world. The world market for coronary stents in 2006 has been valued at

$6.18 bn, with a projected value of $13.34 billion by the year 2013 (CAGR 11.6%).

The world market for drug-eluting stents has been estimated to be valued at $5.14 bn in

2006 and is expected to increase in value to $12.40 bn by the year 2013 (CAGR

13.4%). The world market for bare metal stents is currently valued at $1.04 bn but is

expected to decline in value to $0.94 bn by the end of the forecast period (CAGR

1.4%).

The structure of the market in the different geographic regions comes as a result of the

disparity between the different reimbursement structures. For example, in the United

States Medicare Center for Medicare Services (CMS) established the reimbursement

policy for drug-eluting stents to be conditional to the FDA approval and pay

differentially for alternative stents so the hospitals are not penalized for using the more

expensive drug-eluting products. Growth in the market for drug-eluting stents has been

much slower as a result of disparate healthcare structures each having different

reimbursement systems which influences the choice of stent and the reimbursement

value.

Although these forecast figures represent the foreseeable market value for coronary

stents the latest evidence suggests that drug-eluting stents have a tendency to cause late

stent thrombosis or dangerous blood clots. The introduction of this market variable may

result in an increased use of bare metal stents and as a direct result of these concerns

the market has experienced slight decline in the usage rate of drug-eluting stents

particularly in the United States.

Page 78: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

78

Figure 2.3 provides an analysis of the market shares in 2006 comparing the leading

suppliers of drug-eluting stents and bare metal stents. There are now four major

manufacturers of coronary stents. These are Cordis (Johnson & Johnson), Boston

Scientific Corporation, Medtronic and Abbott Laboratories (Abbott Vascular). Cordis

(Johnson & Johnson) and Boston Scientific Corporation have dominated the drug-

eluting stent market

Cordis Corporation (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson) has occupied the leading

position in the cardiology market for a number of years with a comprehensive portfolio

of interventional and minimally invasive products. Cordis also have a large and

sophisticated sales force operating throughout the world as well as strength in their

proprietary technologies and intellectual property. Currently Business Insights Ltd have

determined that despite the competitive activity primarily from Boston Scientific

Corporation and a variety of manufacturing issues with the Cypher Stent, they are

currently still the worlds largest supplier of drug-eluting stents with an estimated

market share of 43.5%.

Boston Scientific Corporation is currently the second largest market supplier for drug-

eluting stents with an overall market share of 37.7%. It has gained market share

through aggressive marketing utilizing their strong cardiology sales force, and through

the acquisition of proprietary technologies and intellectual property through product

research and development and through acquisition (e.g. Interventional Technologies in

April 2001). Boston Scientific Corporation has a particularly strong market position in

the United States and is the market leader for drug-eluting stents.

A number of significant developments have occurred recently altering the structure and

dynamics of the market place. The most important development has been the

completion of the combination between Guidant by Boston Scientific Corporation in

April 2006. This followed a protracted series of bids and counter bids between Cordis

Corporation (Johnson & Johnson) and Boston Scientific Corporation over a 2 year

period to gain control of Guidant, its business, and its proprietary technologies. In order

to comply with both the European Commission and U.S. antitrust laws Boston

Page 79: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

79

Scientific Corporation were required to ensure that Guidant’s vascular intervention and

endovascular businesses were acquired by Abbott Laboratories (to be incorporated

within their subsidiary Abbott Vascular). The completion of this acquisition by Abbott

Laboratories (from Guidant) was concluded on the 21st April 2006 just before the

closing of the Boston Scientific-Guidant transaction.

The consequence of this “combination” has had a number of ramifications to the

structure of the market. Boston Scientific has as a direct result of the “combination”

protected its market position in the drug-eluting stent market by preventing Cordis

Corporation acquiring the proprietary technologies of Guidant. In subsequent

developments Boston Scientific have managed to circumvent the antitrust laws by

establishing distribution agreements in September 2006 with Abbott Vascular for

Abbott's XIENCE™ V Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System. Boston Scientific

will distribute the XIENCE™ V Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System under the

name of the PROMUS Stent. Guidant, prior to its acquisition by Boston Scientific, was

the market leader in the bare metal stent market.

This is expected to strengthen the market position of Boston Scientific over the next

few years as they were, up until February 2007, the only company currently offering

two distinct drug-eluting stent platforms. In a move which was a direct competitive

response Johnson and Johnson announced on the 1st February 2007 they had acquired

Conor MedSystems Inc. Conor manufactures the CoStar® drug-eluting stent, a second

generation drug-eluting stent that has gained the CE mark on the 17th February 2006

and is currently sold throughout Europe, Latin America and certain countries in Asia

by BIOTRONIK. The stent utilizes a unique design of mini-reservoirs, or dimples, in

the stent surface which hold a bioabsorbable polymer.

The CoStar has not yet gained FDA approval for sale in the United States and is for

investigational use only. Conor MedSystems Inc instigated the CObalt chromium

STent with Antiproliferative for Restenosis (COSTAR) I pilot study and COSTAR II

Pivotal clinical trial study and the EUROSTAR (EUROpean cobalt chromium STent

with Antiproliferative for Restenosis) Trials to determine the safety and efficacy of the

Page 80: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

80

CoStar® drug-eluting stent. There are ongoing patent battles waging between Conor

(now J&J) and Boston Scientific, regarding use of the drug paclitaxel. These battles

will no doubt fuel a new front for the "Stent Wars". They may also fuel Johnson &

Johnson into exploring different drugs for use with the Conor stent design.

Biotronik AG - based in Buelach, Switzerland - announced on the 16th December 2006

they had enrolled the first patient into their pimecrolimus drug eluting coronary stent

FIM study, ProLimus I. This development became feasible after Biotronik AG signed

an agreement with Novartis Pharma AG to evaluate certain Novartis pharmaceutical

compounds for its drug eluting stent platforms, of which one is Pimecrolimus. The

ProLimus I trial is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center study assessing the

safety and clinical performance of the ProGenic pimecrolimus eluting stent in patients

with single de-novo coronary artery lesions. In total 60 patients will be enrolled in 5

centers in Belgium and Germany, with the patients will undergoing clinical follow-up

at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and annually up to 3 years.

The Singapore quoted company Biosensors International is another example of a

company specializing in devices for interventional cardiology. Biosensors International

has two drug-eluting stent platforms – the Axxion™ and the BioMatrix® stent systems.

The Axxion™ stent system incorporates an innovative non-polymeric Paclitaxel drug-

eluting stent system. The non-polymeric coating is a permanent biocompatible and

non-thrombogenic stent coating known as Glycocalix. The BioMatrix® stent system is

based on their proprietary BMS known as the S-stent. This DES uses their proprietary

drug, Biolimus A9® and the bioabsorbable polylactic acid (PLA) polymer coating. An

announcement was made on the 12th July 2005 that Biosensors International

Netherlands-based subsidiary, Occam International B.V, had received CE Mark

approval for the Axxion™ stent system.

Others recent developments include the license agreement between Surmodics and

CardioMind made in July 2005 to create a new drug-eluting stent platform which uses

Page 81: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

81

the SurModics' ENCORE(TM) Drug Delivery Polymer Matrix with CardioMind's

novel ultra low-profile stent system. Medivas and Picarus also created an agreement in

July 2005 for the use of the MediVas biomaterial drug delivery technology in

conjunction with Picarus' core technology to develop drug-eluting stents (DES). Both

of these deals involve the use of drug delivery technologies to improve the success rate

of stents.

Figure 3.5: Actual and projected revenues from Coronary Stents, Worldwide sales- 2006

.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Rev

enue

($b)

BMS DES Total

Source: Business Insights Ltd Business Insights Ltd

Page 82: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

82

Figure 3.6: Market Share Analysis, DES v BMS World, 2006

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

50.0

CordisCorporation

(J&J)

BostonScientific

Corporation

Medtronic AbbottLaboratories

SorinBiomedica

Cardio

BIOTRONIKGmbH & Co

Others

Mar

ket S

hare

DES BMS Total Stent

Source: Business Insights Ltd Business Insights Ltd

Emergence of Bioabsorbable Stents

There have been several recent studies conducted to examine some concerns amongst

clinicians about a number of problems or complications associated with drug-eluting

stents. These are primarily concerned with late developing stent thrombosis, allergic

inflammatory reactions, long term antiplatelet therapy and non-compliance. Although

cardiologists are recommending and prescribing anti-clotting (antiplatelet) medications

such as clopidogrel (Plavix) or ticlopidine (Ticlid) for twelve months and aspirin for

life there are growing concerns that late developing stent thrombosis could be a major

complication for DESs. In order to overcome these problems and in recognition of the

advantages of non-metallic implants, which would otherwise interfere with magnetic

Page 83: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

83

resonance imaging and multi-slice computerized CT scanning, researchers are

developing new types of "bioabsorbable" stents that may reduce or eliminate these

risks.

Biomaterials and Bioabsorbable Polymers

One of the attractive materials recognized as having the potential for use in a

bioabsorbable stents is the polymer called poly L-lactic acid (PLLA). Several stent

designs have been built using PLLA monofilaments and appear to be a viable

alternative to metal in some preliminary studies. Furthermore, the results of studies

incorporating an antiproliferative agent onto the PLLA stents have been encouraging.

One such stent the BVS stent from Abbott Vascular has a bioabsorbable structure

made of polylactic acid and a coating that controls the release of the drug everolimus.

In order to determine the safety and efficacy of this stent Abbott Vascular initiated a

study referred to as ABSORB. The ABSORB trial is a prospective, non-randomized

(open label) study and has been designed to enroll up to 60 patients in Belgium,

Denmark, France, New Zealand, Poland and The Netherlands. In this study researchers

from the Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands have been assessing the safety

(Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) and stent thrombosis rate) at 30, 180, and 270

days, with an annual follow-up for up to five years and successful deployment of the

bioabsorbable drug-eluting stent. The six-month results from the first 30 patients in the

trial were presented at the 56th Annual American College of Cardiology Scientific

Session in New Orleans on the 24th March 2007. These demonstrated no stent

thrombosis and a low (3.3 %) hierarchical rate of ischemia-driven MACE such as heart

attack or repeat intervention.

The proprietary polymers developed by Bioabsorbable Therapeutics, Inc. (BTI) is

another example of a bioabsorbable stent The IDEAL Stent is deployed like current

stents; utilizes an anti-inflammatory, therapeutic drug-delivery polymer; and permits

delivery of multiple drugs with tunable release kinetics. The stent acts like a scaffold

Page 84: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

84

for tissue growth during the initial six months, but once the artery has healed, the

IDEAL Stent is absorbed by the body, leaving no permanent implant.

Another example of a reabsorbable stent is the development of the REVA Medical

reabsorbable stent that has a patented “Slide and Lock” geometry. Slide and Lock

geometry allows stent elements to slide and lock into position upon balloon expansion

during stent placement and possesses steel-like strength. On the 6th August 2002 REVA

entered into an exclusive worldwide rights agreement for a tyrosine-derived

polycarbonate co-polymer developed at Rutgers University agreement with Integra

LifeSciences Holdings Corporation. On the 16th November 2004 Boston Scientific

Corporation announced that they had made an equity investment in and secured an

exclusive option to purchase REVA Medical Inc. Although the terms of the agreement

were not disclosed it is clear that Boston Scientific Corporation are already seeking to

establish its presence in the emerging absorbable stent market.

Another biabsorbable stents is also being developed as a result of a joint venture

agreement between Endovasc and TissueGen resulting in Endovasc-TissueGen

Research Sponsors LLC. The purpose of this partnership is to develop a totally

bioresorbable drug-eluting cardiovascular stent for the advanced treatment of coronary

artery disease. Endovas has co-licensed its patented time-release prostaglandin E-1

drug and Tissuegen is contributing its technology related to drug-releasing polymer

fiber scaffolds. Many cardiovascular experts believe this type of stent will be the stent

of the future. As the drug elutes into the vessel, the stent dissolves, leaving nothing to

set up restenosis or thrombus occlusions.

Another company involved in the development of absorbable stents is Amaranth

Medical Inc. They announced on the 26th September 2006 that they established an

agreement between Bio*One Capital of Singapore and Charter Life Sciences of Palo

Alto, California for financing of $7.5 million. This financing is to be used to fund the

development of the company's absorbable stents and to initiate clinical trials.

Page 85: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

85

Absorbable Metal Stent (AMS) Technologies

Biotronik GmbH & Co. KG, a European manufacturer of biotechnologies based in

Switzerland, has developed an absorbable metal stent (AMS) technology. The alloy

stent is made of 93% magnesium and 7% rare-earth metals. It induces rapid

endothelialization, has low thrombogenicity, and a degradation time of 2-3 months.

Magnesium was chosen because it is an essential mineral in the body (the body

requires approximately 350 mg/day) and the stent is made of < 4.5 mg of magnesium.

The alloy also has calcium antagonist and antiarrhythmic properties and, of importance,

is not associated with any adverse allergic reactions. A clinical trial known as AMS

FIM BTK (First-in-Man Below the Knee) has been conducted and a second trial

PROGRESS AMS (Clinical Performance and Angiographic Results of Coronary

Stenting with Absorbable Metal Stents) is currently in progress. The last notification of

developments in this trial were published on the 13th March 2006 and presented at the

Innovation in Intervention i2 Summit 2006, March 11-14, 2006, Atlanta, Georgia.

Further Coronary Stent Developments and Technological Trends

Novel Coating Technologies

Lombard Medical plc based in Abingdon in the United Kingdom has been developing

a new next generation of drug carrier known as the PEP™ (programmable elution

profile). The PEP™ polymer allows drug release kinetics to be accurately programmed,

allowing both the timing and amount of drug release to be controlled. PEP™ coated

stents have demonstrated post 28 days implant showing normal neointimal

development with no evidence of polymer detachment, cell necrosis, inflammation or

fibrin deposition. The ability to “program” the release kinetics of a given drug can be

used to optimize the stent performance. Lombard Medical states for example that

PEP™ can be programmed to release Rapamycin from a few hours up to 50 days.

PEP™ is compatible with many hydrophobic and hydrophilic drugs and can attach to

Heparin or other biomolecules to improve the anti-thrombogenic properties of the stent

surface. They can also be programmed to elute more than one drug from the same stent,

both with individually programmed release kinetics. Lombard Medical state that the

Page 86: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

86

ability to program the elution rates of more than one drug is a breakthrough in the

concept of drug eluting stents making it possible to treat each separate stage in the

prevention of restenosis. As different drugs may be more effective at a different point

in the cycle since disease onset a timed approach is important.

In a related field AllVivo Vascular (AVI) has developed a Biomimetric coating

designed to prevent the inflammatory process that leads to restenosis while still

providing a favorable surface for healing and regeneration of the endothelium. The

Biomimetric coating has been designed by polymer scientists at the University of Utah

and clinical immunologists at Uppsala University. AVI’s coronary stent coating has

two parts. One part is a proprietary End Group Activated Polymer (EGAP). The EGAP

surface technology transforms traditional device materials into biocompatible and

thromboresistant surfaces and further enables the attachment of biologically active or

therapeutic compounds. The second part of the coating is a protein called factor H

which interrupts the inflammatory processes that lead to restenosis. AVI has developed

this coating through the preclinical stage and is preparing to initiate a FIM study.

Gene Therapy technologies and its Potential Use to Prevent Restenosis

There is considerable interest and research being conducted to determine how genes

can be delivered to artery walls by stents to reduce the risk of restenosis. The technique

currently being examined involves to imbedding the selected gene in the biodegradable

polymer, which coats the stent. The purpose is then to allow a controlled release of the

gene into cells in the arterial wall using an appropriate molecular carrier (the vector).

The purpose of the gene therapy vector is to deliver the gene and incorporate it in the

target cell population. Once this has occurred the vector is then designed to either

inactivate or degrade naturally within the cell. These properties are not easily achieved,

and the design of gene therapy vectors continues to be an active area of research.

Robert J. Levy, M.D, at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia has developed a

technique where a water-soluble compound, polyallylamine biphosphonate, binds to

the stent's metal alloy surface in a layer with the thickness of only a single molecule.

Page 87: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

87

The biphosphonate holds and gradually releases adenovirus particles of the type used to

deliver therapeutic genes.

Similar studies have demonstrated that acceleration of reendothelialization can

attenuate restenosis and inhibit stent thrombosis. These effects have been mainly

attributed to the potency of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in serving as an

endothelial mitogen. Work supporting this hypothesis was conducted using

aBiodivYsio stent which was electropolished, cleaned, and coated with a

phosphorylcholine polymer (PC) with or without phVEGF-2 plasmid. Further work is

required to valid the safety and efficacy of this procedure.

Coronary Stents and Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPCs)

Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPCs), here circulating at concentrations of 3-10

cells/mm3 , have the ability to differentiate into functional endothelial cells and have

been shown to be involved in the process of angiogenesis. Since interventional

procedures such as stenting causes damage to the endothelial lining of coronary

arteries, the capacity of the system to quickly and completely reconstitute the lining of

the damaged surface is overwhelmed. EPC capture technology enhances this process

and facilitates the natural healing process of damaged arterial segments. This

accelerated healing will lessen the chance of subacute thrombosis and reduce the

restenotic response. Researchers have examined the prospect of vascular endothelium

healing using EPCs as a more natural and consequently safer approach to the

prevention of restenosis.

OrbusNeich (formerly known as Orbus Medical Technologies) is at the forefront with

their product the Genous Bioengineered R Stent using their proprietary Endothelial

Progenitor Cells Capture Technology. The principle of this technology is to promote

the establishment of a functional endothelial monolayer and thereby provide the

endogenous modulators necessary for efficient healing (using the endothelial

progenitor cell EPC) leading to inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia and platelet

aggregation, as well as improved vasomotor tone. OrbusNeich conducted a HEALING-

Page 88: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

88

FIM (Healthy Endothelial Accelerated Lining Inhibits Neointimal Growth) study to

determine the safety of their stent in 16 patients with stable angina. This was followed

by the HEALING-II study which was a multi-centered, prospective non-randomized

trial using 63 patients in 10 centers. Enrollment was initiated in May 2004 and

completed in October 2004. The interim 18 month follow-up results of this study were

published in May 2006. A further trial known as the HEALING-IIb study was then

initiated in July 2006 with the enrollment of the first patients initiated in August 2006.

OrbusNeich announced on the 22nd August 2005 that they had received CE Mark

approval for its Genous Bio-engineered R stent.

Nanotechnologies and Drug-Eluting Coronary Stents

Researchers have been exploring the use of nanotechnologies to develop a new type of

nano-structured ceramic coating which is used to incorporate the drug. DebioTech S.A,

based in Switzerland, have developed the DebioStent. This has a nano-structured

ceramic coating with different porosities which incorporates the drug. This product has

evolved as a result of a collaborative agreement reached between the Laboratory of

Powder Technology and DebioTech in February 2006.

Development of Novel Estradiol Containing Drug-Eluting Stents

Estradiol is known as a vasculoprotective in premenopausal women. These effects are

probably related to the capacity of estradiol to inhibit smooth muscle proliferation and

migration, hasten re-endothelialization, and restore normal endothelial function

following balloon artery injury, as shown in recent animal studies. Furthermore, 17-

beta-estradiol is a low-molecular-weight, hydrophobic, and lipophilic hormone, which

makes it suitable for loading and delivery from a stent for the prevention of in-stent

restenosis. The first study to determine the feasibility of using 17-beta-estradiol-eluting

stents to inhibit restenosis in humans was the Estrogen and Stents To Eliminate

Restenosis (EASTER) study. Having demonstrated efficacy, a variety of new and

innovative drug-eluting stents have been developed. These include the

Duravest/Estracure 17-ß-estradiol stent which with its estrogen-based drug utilizes a

safe, targeted and biologically-mediated suppression of the repair process and holds

Page 89: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

89

substantial promise for not only improved safety and efficacy but even a pro-healing

effect.

SurModics Inc. and X-Cell Medical Inc. announced on the 9th July 2006 that they

have entered into a license agreement for the use of SurModics' Bravo(TM) Drug

Delivery Polymer Matrix with X-Cell's ETHOS Drug Eluting Coronary Stent System.

The ETHOS drug eluting stent incorporates the Bravo polymer matrix to deliver a

second generation formulation of 17 beta-estradiol.

A further twist to the development of 17-beta-estradiol eluting drugs has been the

incorporation of 17-beta-estradiol to a Rapamycin-Eluting Stent. The Rapamycin Plus

Estradiol-Eluting Stents Versus Rapamycin-Eluting Stents For The Reduction of

Coronary Restenosis (ISAR-PEACE) trial was designed to assess the efficacy of the

Rapamycin plus 17-beta-estradiol-eluting stent vs a rapamycin-eluting stent. The

results from ISAR-PEACE are similar to those seen previously with estradiol-alone

eluting stents. There seems to be no apparent immediate benefit in reducing restenosis

rates. Whether it may have some delayed beneficial (or detrimental) effect on the long-

term follow-up has yet to be determined.

Stem-Cell Derived Endovascular Cells

On the 1st October 2006 Axordia Ltd, Lombard Medical Technologies PLC and the

Centre for Stem Cell Biology (CSCB) and the Cardiovascular Research Unit (CVRU)

both at Sheffield University announced that they had created a consortium to develop a

regenerative stent. The consortium has received significant funding through the

Technology Program from both the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) and the

Medical Research Council (MRC) in the United Kingdom. The technology involves

attaching Axordia’s proprietary, stem cell-derived endovascular cells to Lombard Medical’s

PEP™ programmable polymer coating on the stent surface. The principle is to allow the body

to promote controlled vascular repair and heal the damaged coronary artery vessel wall.

Page 90: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

90

Other research projects include the use of CD34+ stem cells to promote either

angiogenesis, the growth of new capillaries; arteriogenesis, the maturation and

enlargement of existing arteries and arterioles; or vasculogenesis, the sprouting of new

arteries and arterioles in-patients with chronic myocardial ischemia (CMI). The

University of Wisconsin is one of 15 research sites in the United States who are

involved in a clinical trial known as the Autologous Cellular Therapy CD34-Chronic

Myocardial Ischemia (ACT34-CMI) Trial. The first patients were enrolled into the trial

at the beginning of 2007 and the first procedure was conducted on the 7th March 2007.

The trial is sponsored by the Cellular Therapies business unit of Baxter Healthcare

Corporation.

Page 91: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

91

CHAPTER 4

INNOVATIONS IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE CARDIAC SURGERY

(MICS)

Page 92: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

92

Chapter 4 Innovations in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (MICS)

Summary

New and innovative, minimally invasive surgical technologies are poised to replace the traditional, highly invasive protocols used in open-heart surgery.

Currently, there are three types of procedural approaches. These are Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass (MID-CAB) surgery, Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass (OP-CAB), and Port Access Surgery.

Minimally Invasive Port Access Surgery is indicated for Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG), Mitral Valve Repair or Replacement (MVR), MVR/Tricuspid Repair, MVR Redo, MVR/CABG, Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR) and Congenital Heart Defect Surgery, including Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) & Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD).

Beating heart OP-CAB is currently recognized as a technique significantly reducing the mortality and morbidity associated with the use of traditional cardiopulmonary bypass procedures. This procedure is indicated for multivessel disease requiring revascularization and where normal cardiopulmonary bypass is contraindicated.

Robotic Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass (RA-CAB) systems such as The Automated Endoscopic System for Optimal Positioning (AESOP), The Da Vinci System and The Zeus Robotic System are becoming increasingly popular.

Computer aided cardiac surgery including virtual reality in cardiac surgery, TransMyocardial Laser Revascularization (TMLR) including CO2 heart laser systems, holmium: YAG (yttrium aluminium garnet) lasers and the excimer lasers are changing the face of cardiac surgery.

Page 93: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

93

Introduction

Minimally invasive surgical technologies have revolutionized the practice of medicine

over the past decade, with important and impressive breakthroughs in many areas. The

one area which had lagged behind the introduction of these innovative technologies had

been the earlier development of minimally invasive techniques and technologies as a

replacement to the traditional, highly invasive protocol used in open-heart surgery.

However, dramatic new developments in new minimally invasive technologies,

techniques and protocols for cardiovascular surgery since the mid-1990s has

transformed the way heart surgery is being conducted and with it a market which is

evolving and growing rapidly through progressive development into less invasive

forms of heart surgery. Minimally invasive heart surgery refers to several approaches

for bypassing critically blocked arteries that are less difficult and risky than

conventional open-heart surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting - CABG).

Currently, there are three types of procedural approaches. These are Minimally

Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass (MID-CAB) surgery, Off-Pump Coronary

Artery Bypass (OPCAB), and Port Access Surgery. In addition, Robotic Assisted

Coronary Artery Bypass (RACAB) has emerged as an important technological advance

allowing for the considerable improvement in accuracy of operations to beyond the

scale of human ability. Patients who have one these procedures instead of open heart

surgery have a lower risk of complications associated with the heart-lung machine such

as stroke, lung problems, kidney problems, and problems with mental clarity and

memory. In addition to reduced complications, other benefits of minimally invasive

heart surgery are faster recovery and reduced hospital costs.

Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass (MID-CAB)

MID-CAB (minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass) is a coronary artery

bypass procedure done on a beating heart through a minimal access incision. MID-

CAB is suitable for patients with blockage(s) in the arteries on the front of the heart -

i.e. the left anterior descending (LAD) artery and its diagonal branches. This procedure

Page 94: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

94

allows the surgeon to perform bypass surgery without splitting the entire breastbone.

Unlike conventional open-heart bypass surgery, which requires a large incision, MID-

CAB employs a tiny, 6-10 cm "keyhole" incision on the patient's left chest to gain

access to the heart. Surgeons may use MID-CAB incisions with or without the heart-

lung machine.

Indications for MIDCAB

Due to the limited size of the MIDCAB incision, only certain patients are eligible

candidates for the procedure. Patients where there is a clear indication for MIDCAB

include:

isolated disease to the anterior descending or first diagonal artery;

multivessel disease in patients with significant concurrent medical illnesses for

whom cardiopulmonary bypass poses a significant risk, such as patients with

chronic renal failure, diffuse atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta, advanced age,

or respiratory insufficiency;

patients with religious convictions that preclude the use of blood products.

Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass (OP-CAB)

With OPCAB the surgeon makes a vertical incision in the chest; the size of an incision

used in conventional bypass surgery, and splits the breastbone. The difference is that

the heart-lung machine is not used. A stabilizing device is used to restrict movement of

small segments of the heart so that the surgeon can operate on it while it is still beating.

This procedure enables the surgeon to perform multiple (4-5) vessel bypass surgery on

a beating heart.

Indications for OP-CAB

Beating heart OP-CAB is currently recognized as a technique which significantly

reduces the mortality and morbidity associated with the use of traditional

cardiopulmonary bypass procedures. Recent progress in mechanical stabilizers has

Page 95: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

95

made a significant contribution to improving the efficacy of beating-heart surgery.

Although OP-CAB avoids cardiopulmonary bypass (CAB) it is only applicable to a

relatively small segment of the population with coronary heart disease (5%-10%).

These indications are:

Multivessel disease requiring revascularization;

Contraindications or increased risk for cardiopulmonary bypass, such as severe

myocardial dysfunction; immunosuppression; history of transient ischemic attacks

or cerebrovascular accidents; heavily calcified aortas; aortic disease with increased

risk of dissection, rupture or embolization; impaired renal function or need for

dialysis; history of previous surgery

Patients who refuse blood transfusions and blood products;

Other high-risk patients such as those with advanced age, respiratory problems or

other systemic disease;

Minimally Invasive Port Access

The port access technique allows surgeons to forgo the traditional sternotomy (a cut

through the breastbone) and operate on the heart through a number of smaller incisions.

The patient is hooked up to a heart lung machine without opening the chest. The

anastomosis or other procedure can thus be performed on an arrested heart allowing for

greater surgical precision. The comparatively small incisions required here greatly

reduce the amount of post-operative pain experienced by the patient, speed recovery

and scar less noticeably.

Page 96: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

96

Indications for Minimally Invasive Port Access

Minimally Invasive Port Access is progressively moving from an investigative

technique into a proven surgical procedure. It is used today for a variety of procedures

including Mult-Vessel Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG), Mitral Valve Repair

or Replacement (MVR), Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR) and congenital heart defect

surgery, including Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) AND Ventricular Septal Defects (VSD).

Robotic Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass (RA-CAB)

RA-CAB is the latest advance in coronary surgery. Surgeons use a robotic device to

enable coronary bypass without separating the breastbone at all. Surgeons do not have

direct contact with the patient, but perform the operation while watching a videoscreen.

As the technology becomes more advanced, the surgeon may perform coronary bypass

from a distant site (i.e., from another room or another geographical location).

Robotically assisted cardiac surgery uses the principles of endoscopic surgery to

minimise the trauma associated with open heart surgery and essentially eliminates the

tremor effect, and the non-intuitive feel of manoeuvring such instruments. It enables

the use of minimally invasive techniques in coronary artery bypass grafting by scaling

hand motions, decreasing tremor, and enhancing manipulation. In these procedures,

endoscopes and other instruments are inserted through small incisions or “ports” to

access the surgical site.

In this procedure three small pencil-sized ports are used. Through one port a tiny high-

powered, voice-operated camera or endoscope is inserted and held by a robotic arm.

Two further robotic arms that control the surgical equipment are inserted in the other

ports. With this technology the surgeon manipulates the instruments with the help of a

computer. An endoscope is passed through a tiny incision in the chest wall, and two

surgical instruments are passed through additional tiny incisions. The surgeon views

the image provided by the endoscope on a computer screen. Instead of manipulating

the surgical instruments directly, the surgeon manipulates them via a computer console.

The computer interprets the surgeon's hand movements and causes the surgical

instruments to respond accordingly.

Page 97: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

97

Robotic cardiac surgery has evolved from the various forms of endoscopic surgery

such as laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery which was introduced during the late

1980s and early 1990s. Endoscopic heart surgery however only achieved limited

success as the procedures are more complicated where the heart is beating and the

necessary surgical manoeuvres tend to significantly more complex.

There are a number of issues relating to the use of standard endoscopic instruments for

use in cardiac surgery. Standard endoscopic equipment operates with only four degrees

of freedom and as a result there is a considerable reduction in dexterity. In addition

when working through a fixed entry point, such as a trocar, the operator must reverse

hand motions (the fulcrum effect). At the same time, instrument shaft shear, or drag,

induces the need for higher manipulation forces, leading to hand muscle fatigue. Also,

human motor skills deteriorate with visual motor incompatibility, which itself is

commonly associated with endoscopic surgery. In order to overcome these issues

computer-enhanced instrumentation systems were developed during the early 1990s.

These systems provide both telemanipulation and micromanipulation of tissues in

confined spaces. The surgeon operates from a console, immersed in a three-

dimensional view of the operative field. Through a computer interface, the surgeon’s

motions are reproduced in scaled proportion through “microwrist” instruments that are

mounted on robotic arms inserted through the chest wall. These instruments emulate

human X-Y-Z axis wrist activity throughout seven full degrees of freedom.

The current indications for robotic assisted cardiac surgery systems are:

coronary artery bypass surgeries;

mitral valve repair;

epicardial pacemaker leads for biventricular resynchronisation.

Page 98: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

98

Current and Emerging Technologies

Robotics in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

Robotic-assisted surgery uses surgical robotic equipment imitating surgical

movements. There are a number of major advantages associated with the associated

minimally invasive surgery procedures including the ability to operate through small

ports rather than large incisions, resulting in shorter recovery times, fewer

complications and reduced hospital stays.

Robotic Systems

The Da Vinci System

The first truly robotic surgical systems were developed in 1995 when researchers at

SRI International (formerly known as Stanford Research Institute) in collaboration with

Intuitive Surgical. They developed the first robotic system known as the da Vinci

System. In use, a surgeon sits at a console several feet away from the operating table

and manipulates the robot's surgical instruments. The robot has three hands attached to

a free-standing cart. One arm holds a camera (endoscope) that has been passed into the

patient through small openings. The surgeon operates the other two hands by inserting

fingers into rings. The arms use a technology called EndoWrist--flexible wrists that

surgeons can bend and twist like human wrists. The surgeon uses hand movements and

foot pedals to control the camera, adjust focus, and reposition the robotic arms. The da

Vinci has a three-dimensional lens system, which magnifies the surgical field up to15

times. Another surgeon stays beside the patient, adjusting the camera and instruments if

needed.

The da Vinci robotic surgical system and Endowrist instruments were initially

approved for use throughout Europe in January 1999. Intuitive Surgical have received

permission from DGM, their Notified Body and agent of the Danish Government, to

affix the CE mark to their da Vinci Surgical System and EndoWrist instruments. To

maintain authorisation to apply the CE mark, they are subject to annual surveillance

Page 99: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

99

audits and periodic re-certification audits. To date they have met these requirements

and their certificate is valid until December 2010.

In July 2000 the da Vinci System was approved by the FDA for use in laparoscopic

surgical procedures such as removal of the gallbladder and surgery for severe

heartburn. In March 2001, the FDA cleared da Vinci for use in general non-cardiac

thoracoscopic (inside the chest) surgical procedures--surgeries involving the lungs,

oesophagus, and the internal thoracic artery. In May 2001, the FDA cleared da Vinci

for use during laparascopic removal of the prostate (radical prostatectomy). On

November 13th 2002 Intuitive Surgical, Inc. announced that the FDA has cleared the da

Vinci Surgical System for use in mitral valve repair surgery. In July 2004 the FDA

gave approval for the da Vinci to be used in cardiac revascularisation procedures and in

June 2005 it was approved by the FDA for use in paediatric surgical procedures. At the

time of writing more than 571 da Vinci Systems are in use in major hospitals and

surgical facilities throughout North America, South America, Europe, the Middle East

and Asia. On January 11th 2006 Intuitive Surgical, Inc. announced the market

introduction of the da Vinci(R) S(TM) Surgical System. The list price for the da Vinci

S System is currently $1.53 million, which is approximately $200,000 more than the

standard da Vinci System.

The Automated Endoscopic System for Optimal Positioning (AESOP)

The AESOP was originally developed by Computer Motion Inc as an endoscopic robot

system for holding cameras for minimally invasive surgery. Aesop's function is quite

simple merely to maneuver a tiny video camera inside the patient according to voice

controls provided by the surgeon. By doing so, Aesop has eliminated the need for a

member of the surgical team to hold the endoscope in order for a surgeon to view his

operative field in a closed chest procedure. This advance marked a major development

in closed chest or port-access bypass techniques, as surgeons could now directly and

precisely control their operative field of view.

Page 100: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

100

On March 17th 2003 Intuitive Surgical Inc and Computer Motion Inc signed a

definitive merger agreement. As a result of this, merger Intuitive Surgical Inc acquired

the proprietary technologies developed by Computer Motion Inc for both the AESOP

and the Zeus Robotic System.

The Zeus Robotic System

The ZEUS System also developed by Computer Motion is another surgical robot in the

process of being cleared by the FDA. The system is being used in Europe primarily in

Germany. Intuitive Surgical Inc no longer promotes either the AESOP or ZEUS

products but does provide service and technical support to their installed customer

sites. Intuitive Surgical Inc. has discontinued pursuing any further regulatory approvals

for these two products.

Computer Aided Cardiac Surgery

Virtual Reality in Cardiac Surgery

Virtual reality is best described as a collection of technologies that allow people to

interact efficiently with 3D computerised databases in real time using their natural

senses and skills. Virtual reality is being applied to a wide range of medical areas,

including remote and local surgery, surgery planning, medical education and training,

treatment of phobias and other causes of psychological distress, skill training, and pain

reduction. It is also used for the visualization of large-scale medical records, and in the

architectural planning of medical facilities. Virtual reality in cardiac surgery involves

applications of interactive computer technologies to help perform, plan and simulate

surgical procedures. Virtual reality is used to guide the surgeon, sometimes with a

robot to execute the procedure under the surgeon's control (to remove hand tremor and

scale down manipulations for key-hole surgery, for example). In other words, virtual

reality is used to give the surgeon 3D interactive views of areas within the patient.

Planning is carried out preoperatively, to find the best approach to surgery, involving

minimum damage. Simulation is mostly used in training, using patient data often

registered with anatomical information from an atlas.

Page 101: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

101

Laser Heart Surgery or transmyocardial Laser revascularization (TMLR)

The concept of the "laser" was attributed to Albert Einstein in 1905. The terms

"excimer" and "laser" are acronyms. Excimer is an acronym for excited dimer, while

laser stands for light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation. Lasers were

introduced for interventional cardiology in the late 1980s. Initially interventionists

were enthusiastic about them but there were issues concerning laser related

complications, mainly dissections and perforations. Since then the current generation of

xenon chloride excimer lasers, produced by Spectranetics Corporation, (the CVX-300®

Laser System) are being used for coronary and peripheral angioplasty, pacemaker and

implantable cardioverter/defibrillator lead extractions, and transmyocardial

revascularization. Laser energy from the xenon chloride laser is produced when HCI

gas is excited by electrical energy and emits monochromatic, coherent light at a

wavelength of 308 nm. This laser energy ablates inorganic material by photochemical

mechanisms that involve the breaking of molecular bonds without the generation of

heat.

Transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMLR) is based on the use of a high-powered

carbon dioxide or other lasers that interject a strong energy pulse into the left ventricle,

vaporising the ventricular muscle and creating a transmural channel with a 1-mm

diameter. The procedure can be used to create channels along the free left ventricular

wall but not the septum. These channels are placed 1 cm apart in the ischemic

myocardium. TMLR is performed to improve myocardial oxygenation, eliminate or

reduce angina, and to improve the patient's cardiovascular function. Currently there are

3 types of laser systems used in TMLR. These are:

The CO2 Heart Laser System

The CO2 Heart Laser System is a laser that vaporises the heart tissue in a fraction of a

second creating a channel through the wall of the heart that is about 1 mm wide. The

number of channels will be determined by the size of the oxygen-deprived areas of the

heart. The latest development has been the launch of a special high-energy,

computerised ECG-synchronized CO2 laser called the CO2 Heart Laser 2 (PLC Medical

Page 102: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

102

Systems). On the 8th March 2001 PLC Medical Systems announced that they had

received CE Mark approval for its next-generation CO2 Heart Laser 2. The CE Mark

allows PLC to begin marketing the smaller, more mobile TMR laser throughout the

European Union and other countries that base regulatory clearance on the European CE

Mark. In January of this year, PLC announced that the Company received U.S FDA

approval to market the next-generation CO2 Heart Laser 2 system. On May17th 2006

PLC Systems Inc. announced that Ktec Corporation, PLC's exclusive distributor in

Japan, received approval from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare

(MHLW) to market PLC Systems' first generation CO2 TMR Heart Laser System

(HL1) in Japan.

The holmium:YAG (yttrium aluminium garnet) laser

The holmium:YAG (yttrium aluminium garnet) laser is also an infrared laser. The

primary action of both of these lasers is the vaporization of water that causes tissue

ablation. The holmium:YAG laser requires multiple bursts to establish a single channel,

therefore creating a channel that is not uniformly straight. Studies have documented

that the amount of adjacent thermal injury to the surrounding tissue may be greater

with the holmium:YAG laser than with the CO2 laser, but over time the distinctive

qualities of the channels become indiscernible. On the 10th October 2006 Cardiogenesis

Corporation announced that they had received CE Mark approval for marketing its

advanced combination delivery system called the PHOENIX Combination Delivery

System.

The excimer laser

The excimer laser is another type of laser used to perform TMLR. It is an ultraviolet

laser that causes ablation by breaking the protein bonds that hold the myocardial tissue

together. This laser also requires multiple bursts to create a single channel. The benefit

of the holmium: YAG and excimer lasers over the CO2 laser is in the ability to perform

percutaneous transmyocardial revascularization (PTMR). This investigational

procedure utilises a laser beam that is delivered fiberoptically, and allows it to be

Page 103: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

103

placed through a catheter. PTMR is a less invasive approach that can be accomplished

in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Page 104: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

104

Page 105: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

105

Chapter 5

CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS IN EARLY STAGE DEVELOPMENT

Page 106: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

106

Chapter 5 Cardiovascular Drugs in Early Stage Development

Summary

There are a total of 126 new chemical entities currently in Preclinicals in 9 principle disease areas described in this chapter i.e. Angina, Atherosclerosis, Arrhythmiasis, Atrial Fibrillation, Congestive Heart Failure, Hypercholesterolemia, Hypertension, Myocardial Infarction, Thrombosis.

There are a total of 51 new chemical entities currently in Phase I in 9 principle disease areas described in this chapter i.e. Angina, Atherosclerosis, Arrhythmiasis, Atrial Fibrillation, Congestive Heart Failure, Hypercholesterolemia, Hypertension, Myocardial Infarction, Thrombosis.

There are a total of 122 new chemical entities currently in Phase II in 9 principle disease areas described in this chapter i.e. Angina, Atherosclerosis, Arrhythmiasis, Atrial Fibrillation, Congestive Heart Failure, Hypercholesterolemia, Hypertension, Myocardial Infarction, Thrombosis.

Atherosclerosis represents the clinical area where there are the largest number of preclinical and Phase I developments currently being studied. There are a total of 32 chemical entities currently in preclinicals and a total of 11 new chemical entities have been identified in Phase I of development

Page 107: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

107

Introduction

This chapter examines some of the more exciting research and development projects

exploring the potential for new early phase cardiovascular drugs by drug class and

examines the potential for new and innovative approaches to the treatment of

cardiovascular diseases.

Early Developments in Key Cardiovascular Disease Classes

Angina

Despite great strides having been made in the treatment of various cardiovascular

conditions many pharmaceutical preparations, such as the wide range of anti-anginal

drugs currently available (long-acting nitrates, beta blockers and calcium channel

blockers), are overlooked in favor of revascularization using PCI or Coronary Bypass.

Although these revascularization procedures alleviate or prevent anginal symptoms

they have not been able to improve survival or reduce the incidence of myocardial

infarction in patients with stable angina pectoris. As a result the search continues to

develop anti-anginal drugs that reduce the adverse affects, improve patient outcomes,

and extend the range of indications. Table 5.5 provides a review of the early stage

development for pharmaceutical preparations. Arguably the compounds which exhibit

the most potential include YM758, a Phase II anti-anginal drug being developed by

Astellas Pharma Inc. Compound YM758 is a cardiac If channel inhibitor indicated for

the treatment of stable angina and atrial Fibrillation (ventricular rate control therapy)

where it enhances excessive pulse conduction. It is predicted by Astellas Pharma Inc

that worldwide sales of cardiovascular compounds including compound YM758 will

exceed ¥270 billion ($2.2 billion) by the end of year 2010.

Page 108: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

108

Table 5.5: Selected Early Stage Anti Anginal Drug Developments Company Name Product Name Phase of Development Pierre Fabre Medicament F15845 PC SCOLR Pharma Inc Nifedipine PC SCOLR Pharma Inc Verapamil PC Torrent Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. TRC-282 PC Allos Therapeutics Inc Efaproxyn (efaproxiral) I Daiichi Sankyo Company Ltd CS-780 I Dov Pharmaceutical Inc DOV Diltiazem I Sanofi-Aventis AVE9488 I Angiogenix, Inc. Acclaim II Asahi Kasei Corporation AT-877 (oral) II Asahi Kasei Corporation Fasudil hydrochloride II Astellas Pharma Inc YM758 II Circ Pharma Limited IS5MN PM (isosorbide-5-mononitrate) II Futura Medical plc Eroxon (glyceryl trinitrate) II Sanofi-Aventis Ataciguat (HMR1766) II Cardium Therapeutics Inc Generx (Ad5FGF4) III Dimera Incorporated Transdermal Progesterone Cream III Solvay S.A. Tedangin / KC-8857 (tedisamil) III Biovail Corporation Tiazac XC (diltiazem hydrochloride) PA Novadel Pharma Inc NitroMist (nitroglycerin) Lingual Aerosol A Par Pharmaceutical Companies Inc NitroMist (nitroglycerin) Lingual Aerosol A

Source: Medtrack Business Insights Ltd

Similarly Solvay Pharmaceuticals is currently developing tedisamil (KC-8857), a novel

antiarrhythmic with additional anti-ischaemic properties, which acts via potassium

channel blockade. This drug can be categorized as a class III antiarrhythmic agent due

to its effects of action potential and QT interval prolongation in these patients. This

agent was initially developed for its anti-ischaemic properties and Phase I trials have

shown tedisamil to be an effective bradycardic agent, as well as causing a reverse rate-

dependent QT interval prolongation. Subsequent Phase II results have confirmed that in

patients with ischaemic heart disease, tedisamil had beneficial haemodynamic and anti-

ischaemic effects.

Phase III studies in patients with ischaemic heart disease indicated that tedisamil is an

effective agent for the treatment of angina, resulting in a dose-dependent increase in

anginal threshold (with a decrease in anginal attacks, increased exercise capacity

during treadmill exercise and decreased electrocardiographic signs of exercise induced

Page 109: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

109

ischaemia) in comparison to placebo. Although tedisamil has been shown to be an

effective anti-ischaemic agent, and with Phase III trials for angina pectoris now

completed, the company are now pursuing the use of tedisamil for the treatment of

atrial fibrillation, for which tedisamil is still in Phase II/III clinical trials. Launch data

are not yet known.

Another compound being developed by Angiogenix Inc called Acclaim began Phase II

clinical trials in January 2004. Acclaim (organic nitrate combined with L-arginine), an

oral proprietary nitrate therapeutic shown to induce coronary vasodilation while

overcoming the significant problem of drug tolerance, is Angiogenix Inc’s lead product

candidate for the treatment of chronic angina.

Sanofi Aventis also have a strong pipeline portfolio for new and innovative drugs under

development for the treatment of stable and chronic angina. This includes the

compounds AVE9488 (an e-NOS transcription enhancer) and HMR 1069 (a Guanylate

Cyclase activator) in Phase I and ataciguat (HMR1766) guanylate cyclase activator

currently in Phase IIa.

Page 110: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

110

Arrhythmiasis

Table 5.6 provides an assessment of the current anti-arrhythmiasis drugs in early stage

of development. In comparison to some of the other cardiovascular disease areas there

are relatively few drugs in early development for the treatment of arrhythmiasis.

Table 5.6: Selected Early Stage Anti Arrhythmiasis Drug Developments Company Name Product Name Phase of Development CV Therapeutics Inc CVT3619 PC CV Therapeutics Inc Ranexa (ranolazine) PC Sanofi-Aventis SAR114646 PC Torrent Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. TRC-303 PC Wyeth GAP-134 PC AstraZeneca Plc AZD1305 Estimated filing MAA and NDA 2009 I CyDex, Inc. Captisol-Enabled Amiodarone I Wyeth ZP123 / GAP486 (rotigaptide) II Zealand Pharma A ZP123 / GAP486 (rotigaptide) II CV Therapeutics Inc Tecadenoson III

Source: Medtrack Business Insights Ltd

Wyeth Pharmaceuticals are currently developing 2 drugs for use in treating ventricular

arrhythmias. These are GAP-134 currently in preclinicals and rotigaptide (GAP-486)

currently in Phase II. Rotigaptide (GAP-486) had been originally developed by Zealand

Pharma who then in 2003 outlicensed rotigaptide to Wyeth Pharmaceuticals. During

2003 and 2004, Zealand Pharma was responsible for supplementary pharmacology

while Wyeth was responsible for clinical development.

Three Phase I trials have been completed investigating the safety and tolerability of

rotigaptide. Rotigaptide was administered as constant intravenous infusion in healthy

volunteers in (i) an ascending single dose study (24 hours infusion) (79 individuals),

(ii) an ascending dose study (six-day continuous intravenous infusion) (36 individuals),

and (iii) infusion with rotigaptide in combination with oral digoxin therapy, a

commonly-prescribed medication for congestive heart failure, with a narrow

Page 111: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

111

therapeutic window. Rotigaptide was safe and well tolerated in each trial and no drug-

drug interaction with digoxin was observed. The most frequently reported adverse

effect was tissue response at the injection site.

In June 2005, Wyeth commenced an interventional Phase II prevention, randomized,

double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel assignment, efficacy study in patients with

chronic heart disease and acute myocardial infarction. The primary objective of the

trial is to determine whether the administration of rotigaptide will decrease the

occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias in these patients. The study is being conducted as

an international, multi-center, dose finding efficacy trial with about 500 patients at

approximately 80 sites. Zealand Pharma is targeting to receive data based on this study

in 2007.

Page 112: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

112

Atherosclerosis

Table 5.7 provides an assessment of the current drugs in early stage of development for

the treatment of atherosclerosis. There are a total of 32 chemical entities currently in

preclinicals and a total of 11 new chemical entities have been identified in Phase I of

development.

Table 5.7: Selected Early Stage Atherosclerosis Drug Developments Company Name Product Name Phase of Development Abbott Laboratories KH01500 PC Abbott Laboratories KH01503 PC Abbott Laboratories Reverse D-4F PC Ardana plc EP80317 PC Arena Pharmaceuticals Inc Niacin receptor agonist PC Arisaph Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ARI-1778 PC BioInvent International AB BI-204 PC Biomedica foscama IRFI 042 PC Bristol-Myers Squibb Company EXEL2255 / Liver X Receptor antagonist PC Chronogen CHGN005 PC CliniGenetics SA Docosixine PC CV Therapeutics Inc Reverse cholesterol transport PC Cytos Biotechnology AG Adiponectin PC Cytos Biotechnology AG IL1aQb PC CytRx Corporation Iroxanadine PC Dr Reddys Laboratories Ltd DRL 16805 PC Eli Lilly & Co LY465608 PC Eli Lilly & Co LYYYY PC Exelixis Inc EXEL2255 / Liver X Receptor antagonist PC Exelixis Inc XL335 / Farnesoid X Receptor antagonist PC Genentech Inc BI-204 PC Imclone Systems Inc VEGFR-1 inhibitors / Anti-FLT-1 inhibitors PC Kyoto Pharmaceutical Industries KY-455 PC Liponex Inc. CRD510 PC Miravant Medical Technologies MV-0611 PC Miravant Medical Technologies MV0633 PC Phosphagenics Limited APA-01 and Statin PC Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Platelet Adhesion Inhibitor PC Roche Holdings Ltd Trimeric ApoA-I PC Surface Logix SLx-3XXX PC Vascular Biogenics Ltd. CI-201 PC Wyeth XL335 / Farnesoid X Receptor antagonist PC Dr Reddys Laboratories Ltd RUS 3108 I Genfit GFT 505 I GlaxoSmithKline plc 568859 I GlaxoSmithKline plc 856553 I GlaxoSmithKline plc GSK677116 / 677116 I Continued… Company Name Product Name Phase of Development

Page 113: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

113

GlaxoSmithKline plc Rilapladib / SB 659032 I Karo Bio AB Liver X receptor (LXR) I Merck & Co Inc MK-6213 I Novartis AG APP018 / D-4F I Trigen Holdings AG PR-15 I Wyeth LXR-623 I

Source: Medtrack Business Insights Ltd

On the 1st May, 2007 Trigen Holdings AG announced the successful completion of its

first-in-man Phase I study of PR-15, the company's innovative platelet adhesion

inhibitor. The action of PR-15 has been likened to that of a `vascular sticking plaster'

due to its ability to prevent firm platelet adhesion to sites of arterial wall damage

including ruptured atherosclerotic plaques. Such adhesion is the first step in platelet

activation and aggregation leading to myocardial infarction (heart attack) and stroke,

and potentially stimulating further progression of atherosclerosis. PR-15 is being

developed as a novel agent to treat acute arterial thrombosis and prevent or retard

progression of atherosclerosis. On December 13th 2006 Trigen announced the initiation

of a Phase I clinical study with its novel lesion-specific platelet adhesion inhibitor PR

15 following strong efficacy displayed in pre-clinical models. PR-15 is being evaluated

in a Phase I single dose clinical study in 36 volunteers at a site in Germany which aims

to define the safety, tolerability and PK/PD profile of the drug candidate. PR-15 is

being developed as a novel agent to treat acute arterial thrombosis and prevent

progression of atherosclerosis following an acute event. On April 11th 2005 Trigen

Holdings plc and ProCorde GmbH announced that they have merged their interests into

Trigen Holdings AG. The combination of Trigen and ProCorde creates a leader in

cardiovascular drug discovery and development, focusing on thrombosis and vascular

dysfunction.

In addition to the early stage developments described in Table 5.7 there are a further 15

Phase II clinical trials that have been identified. On the 2nd July 2007 Anthera

Pharmaceuticals Inc. announced that enrollment of 200 patients in the Phase II

PLASMA (Phospholipase Levels and Serological Markers of Atherosclerosis) trial has

been completed significantly ahead of schedule. The company plans to announce the

Page 114: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

114

preliminary results later this year and is evaluating the further expansion of the trial.

On 13th April 2007 Anthera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. announced that enrollment has begun

in the company's multi-center Phase II clinical trial (PLASMA -- Phospholipase Levels

and Serological Markers of Atherosclerosis). PLASMA is a double-blind, randomized,

parallel group, placebo controlled study among subjects with stable coronary artery

disease (CAD). Subjects will be randomized to receive either placebo tablets or one of

four orally active doses of A-002. A-002 is a potent inhibitor of secretory

phospholipase A2 (sPLA2) - a family of enzymes which lead to the release of

damaging free fatty acids and lysophospholipids, both of which play a role in the

inflammatory process. The duration of study drug therapy will be eight weeks and

approximately 200 patients in 60 sites in the US and Europe will be enrolled.

On the 4th January 2007 Anthera Pharmaceuticals Inc. announced the US Food and

Drug Administration had approved its Investigational New Drug (IND) application for

its lead cardiovascular compound A-002. As a result of this approval, Anthera will

initiate a multi-center Phase 2 clinical trial (PLASMA - Phospholipase Levels And

Serological Markers of Atherosclerosis) to examine the effect of A-002 on secretory

phospholipase A2 (sPLA2) levels and other well established markers of inflammation

and cardiovascular risk in patients with stable coronary artery disease due to underlying

atherosclerosis. PLASMA is expected to complete enrollment by the fourth quarter of

2007. On the 6th September 2006 Anthera Pharmaceuticals Inc announced it had

entered into a license agreement with Eli Lilly and Company and Shionogi & Co. Ltd.

under which Anthera has obtained worldwide (except for Japan) development and

commercialization rights to an entire platform of clinical and preclinical inhibitors of

phospholipase A2 (PLA2) developed by Lilly and Shionogi as part of their

collaboration.

Page 115: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

115

Atrial Fibrillation

Table 5.8 provides an assessment of the current drugs in early stage of development for

the treatment of atrial fibrillation. There are a total of 6 chemical entities currently in

preclinicals and a total of 4 new chemical entities have been identified in Phase I of

development.

Table 5.8: Selected Early Stage Atrial Fibrillation Drug Developments Company Name Product Name Phase of Development Devgen nv Dev0304 PC Nissan Chemical Industries, Ltd. NTC-801 PC Symphony Medical, Inc. AV-1 PC SyntheMed Inc Repel-AFIB Drug Delivery PC Teijin Pharma Limited NTC-801 PC Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc. XEN501 PC Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Ion Channel Inhibitor I ICAgen Inc Ion Channel Inhibitor I Inotek Pharmaceuticals, Inc INO-8875 / PJ-875 I Xention Limited XEN-D0101 I (formerly Xention Discovery Ltd)

Source: Medtrack Business Insights Ltd

Presently in Phase I clinical trials, on 22nd December 2005 Icagen Inc. provided an

update on the Company's atrial fibrillation program undertaken in collaboration with

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. Bristol-Myers Squibb has been conducting the clinical

development of this program, including a Phase I proof-of-concept study which was

initiated in 2004. As a result of slow enrollment into this proof-of-concept study,

Bristol-Myers Squibb has decided to discontinue this specific clinical trial and is now

considering alternative trial designs.

On the 20th December 2002 Icagen Inc announced the renewal of its research and

development agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb Company for the discovery and

development of small molecule drugs targeting a specific ion channel involved in atrial

fibrillation, a common cardiovascular disorder in which the heart beats irregularly.

Bristol-Myers Squibb and Icagen elected to renew the collaboration in order to further

Page 116: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

116

build upon the significant progress made to date in this area. The renewal provides for

continued research and development funding by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Congestive Heart Failure

Table 5.9 provides an assessment of the current drugs in early stage of development for

the treatment of congestive heart failure. There are a total of 17 chemical entities

currently in preclinicals and a total of 7 new chemical entities have been identified in

Phase I of development.

Table 5.9: Selected Early Stage Congestive Heart Failure Drug Developments

Company Name Product Name Phase of Development Asklepios BioPharmaceutical Inc. BNP-CHF PC Azevan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. SRX246 PC Biocon Ltd Oral hBNP PC BTG plc Aldosterone antagonists PC Cardiome Pharma Corp BRPM program PC CV Therapeutics Inc CVT-4325 PC Cytopia JAK2 inhibitor PC NanoCor Therapeutics, Inc. Carfostin PC Novavax Inc E-Selectin tolerogen PC NOXXON Pharma AG NOX-F37 PC Opexa Therapeutics Inc Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy PC Palatin Technologies Inc PT-19 PC Sangamo BioSciences Inc ZFP TF PC Sanofi-Aventis AVE4890 PC Unigene Laboratories Inc Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) PC VasoGenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Calcitonin Gene Related Peptide (CGRP) PC Warren Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Tissue Protective Cytokines PC Adenosine Therapeutics, LLC Apadenoson I Cardiome Pharma Corp LY458202 (GED-aPC) I Celladon Corporation Mydicar / SERCA2a gene I Eli Lilly & Co LY458202 (GED-aPC) I NovaCardia, Inc. KW-3902 (Oral) I PDL BioPharma Inc Ularitide I Teijin Pharma Limited TPC-806 I

Source: Medtrack Business Insights Ltd

Page 117: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

117

On 17th May 2007 Celladon Corporation and Targeted Genetics Corporation

announced the initiation of a Phase I clinical trial of MYDICAR (AAV1/SERCA2a) in

patients with cardiomyopathy and symptoms of heart failure. Mydicar utilizes an

adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector to deliver the SERCA2a gene to heart muscle

tissue.

The trial, titled "Calcium Up-Regulation by Percutaneous Administration of Gene

Therapy In Cardiac Disease (CUPID Trial)" is a Phase I/II, two-stage, dose-escalation

trial designed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a single coronary artery infusion

using four dose-levels of an AAV1 vector expressing the transgene for SERCA2a to

subjects with ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and NYHA Class III/IV

symptoms of heart failure.

On the 2nd June 2005 Celladon Corporation announced that its collaborators presented

successful results of heart failure trials conducted in large animal models. Such data

presented on the treatment of advanced heart failure in preclinical models using

Celladon's therapeutic agents targets the Sarcoplasmic Reticulum ATPase2a

(SERCA2a) pump. The SERCA2a pump is a central control point for progression of

heart failure, and treatments targeting this pathway essentially reversed the

deterioration in cardiac function in experimental models.

On the 30th April 2007 Cardiome Pharma Corp. announced that it has signed an

exclusive in-licensing agreement with Eli Lilly and Company for LY458202 ("GED-

aPC"), a clinical-stage drug candidate, whereby Cardiome has been granted exclusive

worldwide rights to GED-aPC for all indications. Lilly has successfully completed a

46-person Phase I single-dose placebo-controlled safety study in healthy volunteers for

GED-aPC.

Page 118: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

118

Hypercholesterolemia

Table 5.10 provides an assessment of the current drugs in early stage of development

for the treatment of Hypercholesterolemia. There are a total of 10 chemical entities

currently in preclinicals and a total of 1 new chemical entity has been identified in

Phase I of development.

Table 5.10: Selected Early Stage Hypercholesterolemia Drug Developments Company Name Product Name Phase of Development Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc ALN-PCS01 PC Ardana plc EP80317 PC AVI BioPharma Inc NeuGene HMG-CoA reductase Inhibitor PC Forbes Medi-Tech Inc FM-VP4 with Zocor PC Nisshin Seifun Group Lactobacillus paracasei NLB163 PC REPLICor Inc. REP 9C PC Samaritan Pharmaceuticals Inc SP-1000 PC SCOLR Pharma Inc Niacin PC Shire plc TX-1501 PC World Health Energy, Inc. MAHDL01 PC Microbia MD-0727 I

Source: Medtrack Business Insights Ltd

On the 1st February 2007, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. announced that it presented

new pre-clinical data at the "RNAi for Target Validation and as a Therapeutic"

Keystone Symposium held January 28 - February 2, 2007 in Keystone, Colorado. On

the 5th December 2006 Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc announced that it will advance a

systemically delivered RNAi therapeutic for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia as

its next clinical development program. This program, in collaboration with University

of Texas (UT) Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, is focused on evaluating new

approaches for reducing LDL cholesterol levels using RNAi therapeutics directed to

the disease target called proprotein convertase subtilisn/kexin type 9, or PCSK9.

Alnylam expects to submit an investigational new drug (IND) application for this

program in 2007.

Page 119: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

119

On the 10th April 2007 Samaritan Pharmaceuticals Inc. announced it received a notice

that a European Patent has been granted to Samaritan's SP-1000 (Cholesterol

Recognition Sequence) drug for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. The European

patent is an examined document, and is enforceable as a patent after registration

requirements have been fulfilled in designated countries. Samaritan is taking the

appropriate steps to register the patent in the following European countries: Austria,

Belgium, Switzerland/Liechtenstein, Spain, France, Great Britain, Italy, the

Netherlands, and Sweden.

On the 28th March 2006 Samaritan Pharmaceuticals Inc. announced that it has new

preclinical data gathered in a series of animal studies that shows its cardiovascular drug

SP-1000 reduces blood cholesterol. Advancing to animal preclinical studies, SP-1000

data indicated that it removes cholesterol from the LDL bad cholesterol-apolipoprotein

complex and it reduces blood cholesterol levels in two different types of

hypercholesterolemic animal models. These models included genetically engineered

and diet-induced hypercholesterolemic animals. This new preclinical data is being

prepared to submit to a peer-reviewed journal.

Page 120: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

120

Hypertension

Table 5.11 provides an assessment of the current drugs in early stage of development

for the treatment of Hypercholesterolemia. There are a total of 12 chemical entities

currently in preclinicals and a total of 8 new chemical entities have been identified in

Phase I of development. Currently the leading anti-hypertensive is Norvasc with global

sales in 2005 of $5bn, an increase of 3.9% from 2004. In the US, sales of Norvasc was

$2.6 billion in 2006 a slight increase from sales of $2.5 billion in 2005. Higher growth

rates were seen for other leading anti-hypertensive drugs such as Novartis’ Co-Diovan. In

the US, sales of Co-Diovan was $1.003 billion in 2006 a significant increase from sales of

$0.840 billion in 2005. Co-Diovan/Diovan have benefited from positive clinical trial

results, in particular a controlled trial of Co-Diovan resulted in additional lowering of

systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to Diovan alone.

Table 5.11: Selected Early Stage Hypertension Drug Developments

Company Name Product Name Phase of Development

BioLineRx, Ltd. BL-2040 PC BTG plc Aldosterone antagonists PC Cary Pharmaceuticals Inc. Tempol PC Exelixis Inc XL550 PC Merck & Co Inc NCX 899 PC NicOx S.A. NCX 899 PC Novavax Inc NX-302 (clonidine) PC Rottapharm (Rotta Research Laboratorium SpA) CR 2991 PC Rottapharm (Rotta Research Laboratorium SpA) CR 3834 PC Speedel SPP1100 series PC Torrent Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. TRC-9XXX PC Vitae Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Renin Inhibitor PC (formerly Concurrent Pharmaceuticals) Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. Doxazosin SR I Dov Pharmaceutical Inc DOV Diltiazem I Eurand Zanidip MR (lercanidipine I hydrochloride) / LCP-Lerc IntelGenx Corp. INT001 I LifeCycle Pharma Zanidip MR (lercanidipine I hydrochloride) / LCP-Lerc Medicure Inc MC-4262 I Novartis AG LCI699 I Novartis AG VNP489 I

Source: Medtrack Business Insights Ltd

Page 121: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

121

On the 14th November 2006 NicOx S.A. announced very good preclinical results on a

prototype compound from its ongoing research collaboration with Merck & Co. Inc as

were reported by the two companies in an oral presentation at the American Heart

Association (AHA) Scientific Sessions. These results suggest that NicOx' proprietary

nitric oxide-donating technology may have the potential to improve the blood pressure

lowering activity of antihypertensive agents. Enalapril, a common anti-hypertensive

drug and equimolar doses of NCX 899, a nitric oxide-donating derivative of enalapril,

were studied in aged spontaneously hypertensive rats, a validated model of

hypertension. NicOx and Merck consider NCX 899 as a prototype compound for

demonstrating the increased activity of nitric oxide- donating antihypertensive agents.

Page 122: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

122

Myocardial Infarction

Table 5.12 provides an assessment of the current drugs in early stage of development

for the treatment of myocardial infarction. There are a total of 16 chemical entities

currently in preclinicals and a total of 4 new chemical entities have been identified in

Phase I of development.

Table 5.12: Selected Early Stage Myocardial Infarction Drug Developments Company Name Product Name Phase of Development BioDiem Ltd BDM-K PC BioLineRx, Ltd BL-1040 PC Cardax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Cardax (astaxanthin) PC CliniGenetics SA Nimoxine PC Diffusion Pharmaceuticals LLC TBC (trans bipolar carotenoid) molecules PC MI BioSciences, Inc. DMI-4983 PC EpiCept Corp MX1013 / CV1013 PC Evolutec Group plc rEV576 PC Lev Pharmaceuticals Inc C1-INH PC Lpath Inc Sphingomab PC Molecular Targeting Technologies, Inc. Myoseal PC RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals Inc Thymosin Beta 4 PC StemPath, Inc. SP200aFL PC iaCell Inc Unrestricted Somatic Stem Cells / USSCs PC Warren Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Tissue Protective Cytokines PC Xigen S.A. XG-102 / D-JNKI PC Amorcyte Inc. AMR-001 I DeCODE genetics Inc DG051 I Hunter-Fleming Ltd HF0220 I Osiris Therapeutics Inc Provacel I

Source: Medtrack Business Insights Ltd

On June 6th 2007, BioLineRx Ltd announced it has submitted a request to a European

regulatory agency to begin pilot (Phase I/II) clinical trials of BL-1040, an absorbable

implant to treat cardiac tissue damaged as the result of an acute myocardial infarction

(heart attack or MI). The submission comes following BioLineRx's successful

completion of pre-clinical studies of BL-1040. The multi-center, open label study will

be conducted at several sites in selected European countries and Israel. The results of

the study will provide feasibility data that the Company will use to support the pivotal

Page 123: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

123

clinical trial that is intended to form the basis of the pre-market approval application

for BL-1040 with the U.S. Food and Drug administration.

On the 27th June 2006 Amorcyte Inc announced it has signed an exclusive agreement

for the development and manufacturing of Amorcyte's lead product, AMR-001, with

Progenitor Cell Therapy LLC. The Phase I trial is open at Emory University School of

Medicine. Amorcyte is in final negotiations to open the trial in another leading

cardiology center within 90 days. Amorcyte is actively recruiting patients for the trial.

On the 8th May 2007 Amorcyte, Inc. announced the completion of the second of four

dose cohorts in its Phase I clinical trial. The trial will now await review of the data by

the data safety monitoring board (DSMB) in accordance with the protocol. The Phase I

trial initially opened in June at the Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta,

Georgia under Principal Investigator, Arshed A. Quyyumi, MD, FRCP, FACC. The

second and third sites to were the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine and the

Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal.

On the 25th March 2007 Osiris Therapeutics, Inc. announced the positive six-month

results in a groundbreaking clinical trial evaluating Provacel, an adult mesenchymal

stem cell (MSC) therapy for the treatment of heart disease. In a 53-patient, double-

blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the safety and preliminary efficacy of the

intravenous administration of Provacel, heart attack patients receiving the therapy had

significantly lower rates of adverse events, such as cardiac arrhythmias, as well as

significant improvements in heart, lung and overall condition. Administration of

Provacel was found to be well tolerated at all dose levels.

Page 124: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

124

Thrombosis

Table 5.13 provides an assessment of the current drugs in early stage of development

for the treatment of thrombosis. There are a total of 23 chemical entities currently in

preclinicals and a total of 12 new chemical entities have been identified in Phase I of

development. BMS/Sanofi-Aventis’ Plavix (clopidogel) an anti-platlet and used for the

treatment of patients that have had a stroke or MI, or are diagnosed as having concomitant

hypertension and vascular disease leads the market with sales of $5.8bn in 2005, an

increase of 16.4% from the previous year.

According to IMS data sales of Plavix in the United States alone amounted $2.831 billion

in 2006, a significant decrease since 2005 when they stood at $3.377 billion. Plavix’s sales

in the United States have come under significant pressure from generic competition,

particularly from the generic competitor made by Apotex in 2006. Bristol Myers Squibb

and Sanofi-Aventis are locked in a patent battle with Apotex of Canada, which

launched a generic version of the blood thinner on August 8 2006 in spite of unresolved

litigation. Under terms negotiated between Apotex, Bristol and Sanofi, Apotex was

allowed a window to launch its version of Plavix before Bristol and Sanofi challenged

the launch in court. This provision allowed Apotex to "flood the market", according to

Bristol's lawyers, with cheaper generic Plavix. Apotex's generic Plavix had already

captured up to 78 per cent market share for new prescriptions and could continue to

hold that depending on how much stock it sold.

Another threat to Plavix is from its main competitor, aspirin, which is highly effective,

well tolerated and widely genericized. In January 2005, data from a small-scale trial

published in The New England Journal of Medicine indicated that Plavix had a much

higher risk of recurrent ulcers, compared to aspirin plus Nexium (esomeprazole).

Plavix administration demonstrated an 8.6% renewed ulcer bleeding, compared to 0.7%

induced when patient took aspirin and Nexium combined. If this data is demonstrated

in a widescale trial, and built upon by showing data for Plavix plus Nexium, this may

impact future sales growth.

Page 125: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

125

Table 5.13: Selected Early Stage Thrombosis Drug Developments Company Name Product Name Phase of Development Ablynx nv ALX-0081 PC Advanced Gene Technology Corp. AGT168 PC AERES Biomedical Ltd. ABC-48 PC Affimed Therapeutics AG AFM14 PC Arena Pharmaceuticals Inc APD791 PC AstraZeneca Plc AZD1283 PC BioInvent International AB TB-402 PC Biotie Therapies Oyj Alpha2Beta1 Integrin Inhibitors PC Cerylid Pty Ltd CBL1309 PC Chromos Molecular Systems, Inc CHR-1201 / NHAT PC CliniGenetics SA Nimoxine PC EluSys Therapeutics, Inc. tPA HP PC HealthLinx Limited CR001 PC formerly Cryptome Pharmaceuticals) MediciNova Inc MN-447 PC MediciNova Inc MN-462 PC Medicure Inc MC-45308 PC Pfizer Inc ADP receptor antagonist PC ThromboGenics NV Anti-Factor VIII antibody PC Thrombotargets Corporation TT-C01 PC Toray Industries, Inc. TRA-418 PC Torii Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. FUT-187 (sepimostat mesilate) PC TransTech Pharma, Inc. TTP896 PC Yuhan Anti-Thrombotic Agent PC Ajinomoto Co., Inc. AJW200 I Akzo Nobel NV Org 27306 I Emisphere Technologies Inc Oral Low Molecular Weight Heparin I Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. KFA-1982 I Merck KGaA EMD 503982 I Merrion Pharmaceuticals MER-102 I Myriad Genetics Inc MPC-0920 I NV Organon Org 27306 I Teijin Pharma Limited TC-10 I Trigen Holdings AG Flovagatran / TGN 255 I Trigen Holdings AG TGN 167 / TRI 50b-oral I Wyeth Diaplasinin / PAI-749 I

Source: Medtrack Business Insights Ltd

On the 1st November 2006 MediciNova Inc. announced the acquisition of two novel

small molecule cardiovascular agents from Meiji Seika Kaisha Ltd. MN-447 and MN-

462 are antithrombic (anti-clotting) agents that represent novel approaches to blood

clot formation and lysis respectively, and are expected to treat a variety of thrombotic

disorders.

Page 126: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

126

On the 12th February 2007 ThromboGenics NV and BioInvent International AB

announced they have received approval from the Danish Medicines Agency to initiate a

Phase I clinical trial of the novel anticoagulant TB-402. TB-402 is a human antibody

binding to Factor VIII which plays a crucial role in the coagulation of the blood. The

project is being developed within the framework of the alliance between

ThromboGenics and BioInvent. The study is a randomized, placebo-controlled, dose

escalation trial in healthy volunteers, and the objective is to investigate safety,

tolerability and pharmacokinetic properties of the candidate drug. It is expected that the

first subjects will be recruited in the study soon, and that the results will be presented in

late 2007. Given a positive outcome of the initial Phase I study, the parties plan to

follow this up with a Phase IIa programme in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery

who are at risk of thrombosis. TB-402 is also expected to be developed as a potential

treatment to prevent blood clot formation in connection with certain types of heart

arrhythmia, such as atrial fibrillation.

Page 127: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

127

Chapter 6

NEW AND EMERGING CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS

Page 128: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

128

Chapter 6 New and Emerging Cardiovascular Drugs

Summary

Two key anti-hypertensives are forecast to launch in 2007: Novartis’ Rasilez (aliskiren) and Exforge (valsartan plus amlodipine).

On the 6th March 2007, the US FDA approved Tekturna® (aliskiren) for use in the US for Novartis. On the 28th September 2006, Novartis submitted Tekturna to the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA) as a treatment for high blood pressure. Approval by the EMEA is expected by the end of 2007.

It is anticipated that Exforge will be available to patients in the US in September 2007, pending the patent expiry of amlodipine besylate. In January 2007 Novartis announced that the European Commission has granted approval for Exforge®. The EU decision applies in all 27 EU member states plus Iceland and Norway

In December 2006, Pfizer announced that it would discontinue the development of its cholesterol drug torcetrapib. Torcetrapib was one of Pfizer's most promising pipeline drugs and was anticipated to replace revenue lost when Lipitor’s patent protection expires in 2010.

In April 2007, Abbott Laboratories announced that they had submitted a NDA to the FDA for a fixed-dose combination of Niaspan® (extended-release niacin) and simvastatin. Abbott Laboratories anticipate that they will obtain marketing approval for Simcor by the third quarter 2007 and hope to launch at the beginning 2008.

A major blow to the anti-thrombotics pipeline is the discontinuation of AstraZeneca’s Exanta in January 2006, due to concerns of liver toxicity. Exanta (ximelagatran) was expected to achieve high sales when launched and to challenge sales of warfarin.

Solvay Pharmaceuticals announced on 25th April 2007 that they had submitted and filed a dossier for intravenous anti-thrombotic tedisamil for approval by the US FDA as well as by the authorities of European Union countries.

Page 129: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

129

Introduction

This chapter reviews the status and progress of cardiovascular drugs in their late stage

development proving analysis of completed and ongoing clinical trials, with information

on launch dates and forecast sales by cardiovascular therapeutic class.

Anti-Hypertensives

Antihypertensives are a class of drugs that are used in medicine and pharmacology to

treat hypertension (high blood pressure). There are many classes of antihypertensives,

which - by varying means - act by lowering blood pressure. The major classes are

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, Angiotensin II Receptor

Antagonists, Alpha/Beta Blockers, Beta Blockers, Centrally Acting, Peripherally

Acting, Calcium Channel Blockers (CCB), Diuretics, Drugs Acting on Vascular

Smooth Muscle and other miscellaneous preparations.

Growth in the anti-hypertensives market is principally driven by sales of the ARBs,

which continue to benefit from patent protection. Sales of the Angiotensin II Receptor

Blockers (ARBs) have increased following the expansion of the ACE-intolerant

population (due to an increase in prescribing of ACE inhibitors) and positive trial

results for major brands in additional indications

Evidence suggests that reduction of the blood pressure by 5-6 mmHg can decrease the

risk of stroke by 40%, of coronary heart disease by 15-20%, and reduces the likelihood

of dementia, heart failure, and mortality from cardiovascular disease. Preliminary

research suggests that antihypertensives may lower the risk of Alzheimer’s disease.

The level of innovation within the antihypertensives market is relatively active, with

many drugs in development offering minimal increased safety, efficacy and tolerability

compared to currently marketed products. However, the launch of Novartis’ Tekturna

Page 130: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

130

(aliskiren) in the United States early in 2007 and the anticipated launch in Europe later in

2007 early 2008 will provide the first-in-class of a new class of antihypertensive drugs, the

direct renin inhibitors. Previous attempts at treating hypertension by novel mechanisms

have failed, with the most notable attempt being Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Vanlev

(omapatrilat), which was set to be the first in class of antihypertensive agents, the

vasopeptidase inhibitors.

Tekturna (Aliskiren)

Novartis’ Tekturna (aliskiren), formerly known as Rasilez™ is the first in FDA approved

drug in a class of orally active transition-state renin inhibitors. Renin inhibitors represent

the newest generation of drugs capable of blocking the clinically relevant renin-

angiotensin cascade. They block - in contrast to ACE-inhibitors and Angiotensin II

receptor antagonists - this cascade at its top, i.e. at the level of its first enzyme (renin).

This mode of action promises high specificity, excellent tolerability and the potential

for treating hypertension and associated diseases. Tekturna is a potent and specific in

vitro inhibitor of human renin and has good water solubility and low lipophilicity.

Novartis’ Tekturna (aliskiren, SPP100) is been developed as a result of a collaborative

agreement between Novartis and the Swiss based company Speedel. Speedels lead product

candidate SPP100 (aliskiren, Tekturna®), was in-licensed from Novartis in 1999 and

licensed-back to Novartis Pharma in 2002 for further development and

commercialization.

In March 2004 Novartis started trials with Tekturna in Phase III as monotherapy for

hypertension and in Phase IIb as combination therapy. However, clinical trail data did not

present significant improvements in blood pressure control compared to currently marketed

antihypertensive drugs, but Tekturna has shown additional benefits of reducing early

morning elevations to blood pressure. Moreover, at the end of the trial when study

medication was withdrawn, the blood pressure lowering effect of Tekturna persisted as

diastolic blood pressure did not return to pre-study medication levels for two weeks.

Page 131: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

131

Clinical data presented for Tekturna as a monotherapy and in combination with a diuretic,

an ACE inhibitor and a CCB, show strong efficacy but with no significant advantage over

established therapies. However, Novartis’ key aim is to prove that the renin-inhibition

provides improved end-organ protection. Ongoing biomarker studies are anticipated to

provide further support for Tekturna, which is dependent on positive impacts on kidney

and cardiovascular function.

Oral renin inhibitors have the potential to become the next blockbuster antihypertensive

drug class. The introduction of the renin inhibitors will mark the first novel treatment for

hypertension in over a decade and, because of this, many physicians will want to try

Tekturna on their difficult-to-control patients, particularly in combination with other

classes of antihypertensive drugs such as the ACE inhibitors and CCBs. Tekturna’s ability

to control blood pressure over a 24-hour period, leading to true 24-hour efficacy, has the

potential to reduce many of the cardiovascular outcomes associated with hypertension,

such as stroke.

Phase 3 trials with Tekturna are ongoing in the United States, Europe, and Japan.

Novartis made the first regulatory submission for Tekturna to the US FDA on the 20th

April 2006 based on data from more than 6,000 patients in 34 trials. On the 28th

September 2006 Novartis submitted Tekturna to the European Medicines Evaluation

Agency (EMEA) for approval as a treatment for people with high blood pressure using

data from more than 7,800 patients with high blood pressure from 44 clinical trials. On

the 6th March 2007 Novartis announced that the US FDA had approved Tekturna®

(aliskiren) for use in the United States. On the 21st May 2007 a single-tablet

combination of two high blood pressure medicines - the recently approved direct renin

inhibitor Tekturna® (aliskiren) and the widely-used diuretic hydrochlorothiazide - was

submitted for US regulatory approval. Although approval had not been provided by the

EMEA at the time of writing it is expected that approval to be attained by the end of

2007.

Novartis will be ideally placed to market Tekturna® (aliskiren) as they currently market

the leading antihypertensive. Although Tekturna® (aliskiren) has the potential to lead to

Page 132: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

132

cannibalization of Diovan’s sales, it is predicted they will use separate sales forces to

promote Diovan and Tekturna® (aliskiren) using differentiated target populations to

ensure that market share is not taken from Diovan. Sales of Tekturna® (aliskiren) are

predicted to reach $700m by 2011.

Development of a New Class of Renin Inhibitors

SPP600 Series, SPP635, SPP800 Series, SPP1000 Series and SPP1148 are renin

inhibitors included in the research and development pipeline of the Swiss based

biotechnology company Speedel.

In December 2001, Speedel acquired exclusive worldwide rights to Roche's renin

inhibitor programme. The agreement covers a new class of renin inhibitors that has

been discovered by Roche. Through this agreement Speedel obtains exclusive access to

late-stage research compounds as well as related structure-activity knowledge.

The SPP600 series is a novel group of renin inhibitors being developed in a targeted

lead optimization programme by Speedel Experimenta. Under this programme Speedel

is generating its own molecules and intellectual property

In February 2005 Speedel Experimenta successfully completed the first human micro-

dosing studies of new renin inhibitors SPP630 and SPP635 for the treatment of

hypertension and for protecting end-organs such as the heart, kidneys and blood

vessels. On the 31st October 2006 Speedel announced that they had reached another

significant milestone in the development of its family of renin inhibitors with the start

of a Phase IIa clinical trial with SPP635 for the treatment of hypertension. The trial is

expected to finish in about Q3 2007.

Speedel has reached late-stage preclinical profiling of a new series of renin inhibitors

designated as the SPP1100 series. Currently SPP1148 is the most promising compound

candidate from the SPP1000 series of renin inhibitors. The SPP1148, indicated for the

treatment of hypertension and related end-organ disease, entered Phase I in January

Page 133: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

133

2007. The Phase I trial will test the safety and tolerability of single and multiple oral

doses in healthy volunteers and first results are expected in Q4 2007. SPP1148 is part

of the SPP1100 series of renin inhibitors invented by Speedel Experimenta, the

company’s late-stage research unit, established in 2002.

SPP1148 was selected on the basis of better animal bioavailability, positive effects on

renal failure models in animals, and its suitability for manufacturing. The SPP1100

series is based on a new chemical entity compared to other renin inhibitors and this

diversity adds further strength to the pipeline.

Exforge (valsartan plus amlodipine)

In addition to Tekturna®, Novartis has been developing another highly anticipated anti-

hypertensive known as Exforge. Exforge combines in one tablet the two most commonly

prescribed hypertension medicines in their categories -- Diovan(R) (valsartan) and

Norvasc(R) (amlodipine besylate). Exforge is indicated for patients whose blood

pressure is not adequately controlled on any dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker

(CCB) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Also, it is appropriate for patients who

experience dose-limiting side effects on either component, such as amlodipine-induced

edema, dizziness and flushing.

In clinical trials Exforge demonstrated clinically significant blood pressure reductions.

Adverse reactions were generally mild and transient in nature. The most common side

effects in clinical trials were peripheral edema, nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract

infections and dizziness. The incidence of peripheral edema was statistically lower in

people treated with Exforge than in people treated with amlodipine monotherapy.

Novartis has developed Exforge as part of a lifecyle management technique to protect sales

of Diovan, once it loses patent protection. Exforge shares common molecules with both

FDC therapies Co-Diovan (common component being the ARB valsartan) and Lotrel (the

common component being the CCB amlodipine). Novartis is hoping that physicians will be

persuaded to switch patients currently using Co-Diovan or Lotrel to Exforge, as Exforge

Page 134: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

134

has a better tolerability. Exforge is forecast to take market share from existing patient

groups rather than expand the market.

Novartis had not released much information relating to late stage clinical trials for Exforge,

but at the company’s annual analyst meeting in January 2006 they provided some

indication as to the safety and efficacy of Exforge in severe hypertensive patients. Phase III

clinical trial data for Exforge was presented American Society of Hypertension in May

2006. Over 80% of Exforge patients studied reached their recommended blood pressure

goals, with reductions in blood pressure of up to 43 mmHg in some groups. In addition,

Exforge also showed a lower incidence of peripheral edema (swelling of the ankles)

compared to those taking amlodipine alone.

On the 22nd December 2006 Novartis announced that the US FDA had issued

“tentative” approval of Exforge as a new treatment option for patients with high blood

pressure. The US FDA issued this approval notice because Exforge has met all the

required standards for safety, efficacy and manufacturing quality. Exforge is expected

to be available to patients in the US in late September 2007, pending the expiration of

market exclusivity and patent protection for amlodipine besylate.

On the 18th January 2007 Novartis announced that the European Commission has

granted approval for Exforge® with its initial launch into Germany followed by

launches in most other European Union countries throughout the year, pending

expiration of the patent protection for Norvasc. The EU decision applies in all 27 EU

member states plus Iceland and Norway.

CHF-1521

CHF-1521 is a fixed-dose combination of the CCB manidipine and the ACE delapril, being

developed by Chiesi. CHF-1521 is currently in registration in the US and has already been

approved in Italy. Chiesi is ready to launch CHF-1521 in Italy, but is waiting for an official

pricing and reimbursement status from the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA).

Page 135: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

135

Clinical trial data for CHF-1521 is limited, but does indicate that a combination of the CCB

manidipine with the ACE delapril is a safe and effective treatment for hypertension

compared to other combination treatments, such as ACE/diuretic combinations. CHF-1521

will face competition from the market leading combination ACE/CCB: Novartis’s Lotrel

(benazepril plus amlodipine). Additionally, there are two other ACE/CCB combinations,

AstraZeneca’s Lexxel (enalapril plus felodipine) and Abbott’s Tarka (trandalopril plus

verapamil).

There are relatively few other ACE/CCB combinations on the market, and because of this

CHF-1521 has ideal market conditions for a successful launch. However, the efficacy of

combined manidipine and delapril is lower compared to other combinations that could be

developed. Novartis’s pipeline combination product Exforge (valsartan plus amlodipine) is

considered to be better received by prescribing physicians and be a huge commercial

success. Sales of CHF-1521 are forecast to reach $5m in 2011, with a launch date of 2008.

Cleviprex(TM) (Clevidipine)

Cleviprex(TM) (Clevidipine) is a novel, investigational drug belonging to a well-

known class of drugs called dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists. It is the first

third-generation dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker that acts rapidly and reliably,

is vascular- and arterial- selective, and has an ultrashort half-life.

In May 2003 The Medicines Company exercised an option negotiated in March 2002 to

acquire exclusive worldwide development and commercial rights of Clevelox from

AstraZeneca.

In total, Cleviprex(TM) (Clevidipine) has been evaluated in 3 Phase I studies, 8 Phase

II studies and 5 Phase III clinical studies which have been conducted in healthy

volunteers cardiac surgery patients, in patients with essential hypertension, and include

comparative studies versus nitroglycerin nicardipine and sodium nitroprusside. The

Medicines Company announced on the 27th March 2007 the results of 3 Phase III

clinical trials known as ECLIPSE. The ECLIPSE program included a total of 1,964

cardiac surgery patients each enrolled in one of three randomized, open-label trials

Page 136: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

136

comparing Cleviprex to current intravenous antihypertensive agents: nitroglycerin,

sodium nitroprusside or nicardipine (ECLIPSE-NTG, ECLIPSE-SNP and ECLIPSE-

NIC trials, respectively).

Another safety study known as the VELOCITY study is now completed. The primary

objective of this study was to evaluate if patients presenting through the emergency

department with severe hypertension can have their blood pressure lowered in a safe

and controlled fashion using clevidipine. Secondary objectives in this study include

time to reach target blood pressure and hemodynamic measurements. This study

employs an open label, single arm design.

Additional clinical trials of clevidipine are underway to investigate

electrocardiographic safety in healthy volunteers; pharmacokinetics,

pharmacodynamics and safety in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension

during prolonged hours (>72 hours) continuous infusion, and safety and efficacy in

patients with severe hypertension.

Based on the results of the Phase III trials that have been conducted the Medicines

Company expects to submit a new drug application to the FDA for Cleviprex(TM)

(clevidipine) in June 2007 with an anticipated launch date of late 2007 and early 2008.

Antihypertensives: Current Pipeline and Late Stage Development

Tekturna (formerly known as Rasilez™) or Aliskiren by Novartis. Aliskiren is an

oral direct renin inhibitor (SPP100) and is indicated as adjunctive treatment for

hypertensive patients with stable heart failure. A new drug application for aliskiren was

submitted to the US FDA in early 2006. Novartis has also submitted aliskiren to the

European Medicines Agency and is not yet licensed in Canada.

Exforge (Valsartan plus amlodipine) by Novartis. Exforge is indicated for patients

whose blood pressure is not adequately controlled on any dihydropyridine calcium

Page 137: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

137

channel blocker (CCB) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Approved both in the

US and Europe. Anticipated launch throughout 2007.

CHF-1521 (Manidipine+delapril) by Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA. CHF-1521 is a

fixed-dose combination of the CCB manidipine and the ACE delapril. Phase III clinical

trials completed and currently in registration process in the US

Clevelox (Clevidipine, i.v.) by The Medicines Company/ AstraZeneca. Clevidipine

belongs to a well-known class of drugs called dihydropyridine calcium channel

antagonists. Completion of Phase III ECLIPSE clinical trials anticipated submission of

results to the US FDA in June 2007.

Cardoxal (MC-4232) by Medicure Inc. This is a combination drug containing MC-1,

a cardioprotective drug with the ACE inhibitor, lisinopril. Cardoxal (MC-4232) is used

for the treatment of diabetic patient suffering with high blood pressure. Completed

Phase II MATCHED study (MC-1 and ACE Therapeutic Combination for

Hypertensive Diabetics). Plans to commence pivotal Phase III clinical development

program 2007. Planned launch date 2010-2011.

Darusentan by Gilead Sciences (Gilead acquired Myogen November 2006).

Darusentan is a type-A selective (ERA) and potent inhibitor of endothelin-induced

vasoconstriction. Darusentan is indicated for the treatment of patients with resistant

hypertension. Phase II completed and enrollment taking place in 2 Phase III clinical

trials.

Nebivolol by Mylan Laboratories/, Forest Laboratories, Inc. Nebivolol is a

selective beta 1-adrenergic (cardioselective) receptor antagonist indicated for the

treatment of hypertension. Marketed in 50 countries outside the North America.

Currently under U.S. regulatory review for the treatment of hypertension.

Page 138: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

138

SPP600 Series, SPP635, SPP800 Series, SPP1000 Series and SPP1148 (renin

inhibitors) by Speedel. These NCEs are indicated as adjunctive treatment for

hypertensive patients with stable heart failure. Preclinical, Phase I and Phase IIa

(SPP635).

Thelin™ (Sitaxentan) by Encysive Pharmaceuticals. Indicated for patients with

primary pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary hypertension associated with

connective tissue disease (CTD). Marketing authorization granted for in the European

Union August 2006. Currently marketed in 4 European countries i.e. Ireland, Germany,

The Netherlands and the UK. The FDA has designated the review as a Class 2

resubmission and issued a new Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) target action

date of June 15, 2007.

Zanitek® by RECORDATI SpA. This is a combination drug containing CCB Zanidip

(lercanidipine), and the ACE inhibitor enalapril. Zanitek® is used to treat hypertension.

Completed clinical trials and due to be launched in Germany in May 2007 and rest of

Europe throughout 20072008.

Cardoxal (MC-4232) (MC-1 cardioprotectant plus lisinopril)

Cardoxal (MC-4232) is a novel combination drug for the treatment of diabetic patients with

hypertension being developed by Medicure. Cardoxal (MC-4232) is a fixed dose combination

product containing MC-1 (pyridoxal 5’-phosphate), and the ACE inhibitor lisinopril. MC-1

is a naturally occurring, cardioprotective small molecule, which has been shown to act by

protecting cardiomyocytes. Medicure is developing Cardoxal (MC-4232) for patients with

coexisting conditions of diabetes and hypertension.

A Phase II trial was initiated in April 2004 to assess the safety and efficacy of Cardoxal

(MC-4232) in 15 hypertensive patients. Following positive data generated from this trial,

Medicure initiated the MATCHED (MC-1 and ACE therapeutic combination for

hypertensive diabetics) trial, a randomized, parallel group, cross-over, double-blind,

Page 139: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

139

placebocontrolled comparison of MC-1 alone and in combination with lisinopril. In

September 2005, Medicure announced positive results from the study, with all primary

blood pressure and metabolic endpoints being met. Phase III trials are in the process of

being initiated and as a result of the current positive clinical trial data Cardoxal is likely to

receive a high level of partnering interest. Partnering for this product is essential for

Medicure to gain access to additional clinical expertise and to gain the funding required to

advance the drug through later-stage clinical development. Cardoxal is forecast to launch in

2010, reaching sales of $15-20m in 2011.

Darusentan

Myogen Inc. had been developing Darusentan a type-A selective endothelin receptor

antagonist (ERA) and potent inhibitor of endothelin-induced vasoconstriction.

Darusentan has progressed through to Phase IIb clinical trials. In June 2006 Myogen

initiated Phase III clinical trials to evaluate darusentan for patients with resistant

hypertension. Because the study had enrolled patients very slowly, they made

modifications to the study’s protocol which, following discussion with regulatory

authorities was allowed as a method of increasing the enrollment rate in the study. On

the 17th November 2006 Gilead Sciences Inc acquired Myogen Inc.

Ambrisentan

With the purchase of Myogen Inc Gilead Sciences Inc acquired Myogen’s lead product

candidate, ambrisentan. Ambrisentan is a non-sulfonamide, propanoic acid-class,

endothelin receptor antagonist that is selective for the endothelin type-A (ET(A))

receptor. Activation of the ET(A) receptor by endothelin, a small peptide hormone,

leads to vasoconstriction and cell proliferation. PAH is associated with elevated

endothelin blood levels. Ambrisentan has been granted orphan drug designation for the

treatment of PAH in both the United States and European Union.

In December 2006, Gilead Sciences Inc completed the submission of a New Drug

Application (NDA) to the FDA for marketing approval of ambrisentan (5 mg and 10

mg) for the once-daily treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). In

Page 140: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

140

February 2007, the FDA granted Gilead Sciences Inc a priority review status for the

NDA for marketing approval of ambrisentan, and established a target review date of

June 2007. On the 23rd March 2007 Gilead Sciences, Inc. announced that

GlaxoSmithKline's Marketing Authorization Application (MAA) for ambrisentan for

the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) was validated by the European

Medicines Agency (EMEA) following a review by the Committee for Medicinal

Products for Human Use (CHMP). Following the validation of an MAA, the dossier is

distributed to members of the CHMP for formal review. As a result of this validation

Gilead will receive a milestone payment from GlaxoSmithKline.

Nebivolol

Nebivolol is a selective beta 1-adrenergic (cardioselective) receptor antagonist with

vasodilating properties and is already approved and successfully marketed for the

treatment of hypertension in more than 50 countries outside of North America. On 1st

May 2007 Mylan Laboratories announced that they had a submitted a response to the

approvable letter issued by the US FDA for nebivolol currently under U.S. regulatory

review for the treatment of hypertension. Upon acceptance of this response, Forest

Laboratories Inc anticipates the FDA will complete its review of nebivolol's NDA

within six months. Forest licensed nebivolol from Mylan Laboratories in January 2006

and has responsibility for all sales and marketing as well as the current and future

development programs.

Zanipress® / Zanitek®

The Italian company Recordati has been developing Zanipress® / Zanitek®

(lercanidipine+enalapril), a fixed dose combination of its lead cardiovascular product, the

CCB Zanidip (lercanidipine), and the ACE inhibitor enalapril. Both lercanidipine and

enalapril have been shown to be effective antihypertensive drugs as monotherapies, with

lercanidipine possessing a better side-effect profile compared to other dihydropyridine

CCBs, such as amlodipine. There are some concerns as to whether Zanipress will be a

commercial success, which center around poor physician awareness of the product and

unwillingness to prescribe it during its first years on the market and opinions regarding the

relative merits of an ACE/CCB combination.

Page 141: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

141

On the 27th July 2006 Recordati announced that they had received the approval for

Zanitek®, from the BfArM, the German medicines agency. Germany will act as

Reference Member State in the mutual recognition approval process for the rest of

Europe which is expected to be completed during 2007. A further announcement was

made on the 21st December 2006 when Recordati announced that they had signed a

non-exclusive agreement with sigma-tau, a leading Italian pharmaceutical company, for

the marketing and sale of Zanitek® in Italy (known as Zaneril® in Italy). The launch is

expected to take place at the beginning of 2008 following approval in 2007. Other

agreements have already been completed with other companies for the sale of

Zanitek®, in France, Spain, Benelux, the Nordic countries including Finland, Korea,

Australia, Taiwan, the Middle East including Israel, and South Africa.

Thelin™ (Sitaxsentan)

Encysive Pharmaceuticals (formerly Texas Biotechnology Corporation), is developing

a sulfonamide class endothelin receptor antagonists under the generic name of

Sitaxsentan and plans to market it under the brand name of Thelin™. Thelin™ is

proving to be effective in the treatment of a variety of diseases such as hypertension

where the regulation of vascular constriction is important. Encysive Pharmaceuticals

received European Union marketing authorization for THELIN from the European

Commission in August 2006 and is currently being marketed in Germany, the UK,

Ireland, and on the 16th April 2007 became available in The Netherlands for the

treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

Encysive Pharmaceuticals announced in December 2006 that the US FDA has accepted

for review the Company's complete response to the July 24, 2006 approvable letter

regarding its NDA for THELIN. The FDA has designated the review as a Class 2

resubmission and issued a new Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) target action

date of June 15, 2007.

Page 142: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

142

TBC3711

Encysive Pharmaceuticals is also developing the next-generation endothelin antagonist

for both oral and intravenous formulations. TBC3711 is more potent than THELIN,

with selectivity for the endothelin A receptor of 100,000:1 versus the endothelin B

receptor. This higher selectivity may make TBC3711 effective in treating high blood

pressure, particularly in patients with resistant hypertension where current anti-

hypertension drugs are ineffective in lowering blood pressure. Encysive

Pharmaceuticals expect that Phase II dose-ranging studies of oral TBC3711 in the

treatment of resistant hypertension will recommence in 2007. Encysive

Pharmaceuticals have also filed an Investigational New Drug (IND) application with

the FDA seeking approval to evaluate intravenous TBC3711 in a currently undisclosed

indication.

Page 143: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

143

Anti-Dyslipidemics

Dyslipidemia is abnormal lipid metabolism. It is very common among people with

Type 2 diabetes, and most frequently involves increased levels of triglycerides, very

low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)

cholesterol, as well as decreased levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL). The major

classes of lipoproteins are provided in Table Table 6.14. These abnormalities appear to

be caused by increased secretion of VLDL particles from the liver due to increased

concentrations of free fatty acids and glucose.

The anti-dyslipidemic market is saturated with third-generation statins, and thus superior

therapies are difficult to develop. Advancement in the anti-dyslipidemic market lies in the

fibrate class, with drug classes such as Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor

(PPAR) alpha agonists potentially expanding the adjunctive market. In addition, patients

with mixed dyslipidemia and diabetes are increasing, expanding the patient population.

Pfizer’s Lipitor is currently the most widely used treatment for lowering cholesterol and

the best-selling pharmaceutical product of any kind in the world. Pfizer’s Lipitor

(atorvastatin) / Torcetrapib - combination therapy had the potential to be a major “block

buster”, but was discontinued in late 2006 due to safety concerns. The discontinuation of

torcetrapib will have an impact on the other member of the CETP inhibitor pipeline drugs,

in particular Roche’s JTT-705. Roche acquired the exclusive worldwide rights (excluding

Japan and Korea) to develop and commercialize Japan Tobacco’s CETP inhibitor, JTT-

705, in 2004. The agent is being developed for the prevention of heart disease in low HDL

patients and for the treatment of hyperdyslipidemia. The drug is currently in Phase II in the

Netherlands and Phase I in Japan.

Page 144: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

144

Table 6.14: Characteristics of Major Classes of Lipoproteins Category Composition Origin Chylomicrons Exogenous/dietary Trigylcerides Gut Very-Low-Density-Lipoproteins Trigylcerides Liver (VLDP) Intermediate-Density Lipoproteins Cholesterol Esters and VLDL/HDL Trigylcerides Catabolism Low Density Lipoproteins Cholesterol VLDL Catabolism High-Density-Lipoproteins (HDL) Cholesterol Liver, Gut

Source: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Treatment Options of Dyslipidemia Business Insights Ltd

Pfizer discontinues torcetrapib development

Pfizer announced on the 2nd December 2006 that it discontinued the development of its

cholesterol drug torcetrapib. Torcetrapib was one of Pfizer's most promising pipeline drugs

and anticipated to replace revenue lost when Lipitor’s patent protection expires in 2010.

The decision to discontinue torcetrapib came after an independent Data Safety Monitoring

Board recommended ending the study due to an unexpected high incidence of mortality

and cardiovascular events. An analysis of the data from the ILLUMINATE trial showed

that a greater number of deaths and adverse side effects had occurred in the group receiving

torcetrapib compared with those patients receiving Lipitor; 81 deaths versus 51. However,

Pfizer noted that while torcetrapib, like Lipitor, affects the body's levels of cholesterol, the

new findings do not provide efficacy concerns related to Lipitor, as the two drugs act via

different mechanisms.

The failure of Pfizer Inc's experimental cholesterol drug torcetrapib has clearly:

Created a major market opportunity for recently approved drugs such as Vytorin

(marketed as Inegy outside the U.S.) and Zetia (marketed as Ezetrol outside the

U.S.) from Schering-Plough Corp and Merck and AstraZeneca Plc's Crestor.

Cast a shadow over the future of similar drugs from other members of the CETP

inhibitor pipeline drugs being developed by rival companies such as Roche Holding

AG and Merck & Co Inc. However Roche Holding AG are continuing with the

development of RI658 despite the setback with Pfizers Torcetrapib.

Page 145: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

145

R1658

R1658, licensed from Japan Tobacco, is a cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP)

inhibitor with a unique mechanism of action that is designed to raise levels of HDL-C,

or “good” cholesterol (a lack of HDL-C is associated with an increased risk of

cardiovascular disease). Phase II studies are nearing completion; the data indicate that

the compound has a good safety profile and the desired effects on HDL-C and other

blood lipids (fats). The results of these studies will form the basis for a decision in

2007 on entry into phase III testing. Roche Holding AG remains confident that despite

the recent discontinuation of Torcetrapib by Pfizer, product development of R1658 will

continue. R1658 has not been associated with any adverse cardiovascular changes or

any increase in blood pressure when given to patients as monotherapy or in

combination with statins. Nor did R1658 affect cardiovascular parameters in animal

models.

Simcor (Niaspan® (extended-release niacin) and simvastatin (generic Zocor®))

Simcor®, a fixed-dose combination of Niaspan and simvastatin (generic Zocor®) to

treat lipid disorders was originally being developed by Kos Pharmaceuticals for the

treatment of mixed dyslipidemia.

The statins are widely used to lower cholesterol levels via inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-

methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase. Several large randomized controlled trials have

shown that statins reduce the risks for vascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction,

stroke, and the need for arterial revascularization procedures, all in relation to the

lowering of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. Six statins are available

worldwide: lovastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, atorvastatin, and

rosuvastatin; pitavastatin is available only in Japan and India.

Page 146: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

146

Simvastatin is the second leading statin in the global market and is supported by a strong

clinical trial program and a proven safety profile. Generic simvastatin became available in

the US in mid-2006. More patients are expected to receive simvastatin due to the lower

cost of the drug in comparison to Lipitor once the patent has expired globally. Therefore,

more patients could potentially receive the simvastatin+niacin drug combination.

Niaspan (extended release niacin) was launched in 1997 by Kos Pharmaceuticals and is the

most potent HDL increasing agent currently on the market. As long as the cost of the

combination drug is cheaper than the sum of the separate entities this combination is a

promising addition to the market.

At the beginning of July 2005, Kos Pharmaceutical announced the start of a landmark

study to evaluate whether combination therapy with niacin and simvastatin is superior to

simvastatin alone in preventing cardiovascular events such as heart attack, stroke and acute

coronary syndromes. The AIM-HIGH Study (Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic

syndrome with low HDL-C/high Triglyceride and Impact on Global Health outcomes) is

the first large-scale study using combination therapy with niacin and simvastatin to

evaluate whether there is a benefit of treating low HDL-C levels and high triglyceride

levels in vascular disease patients, who have attained NCEP LDL-C.

Kos Pharmaceuticals was acquired by Abbott Laboratories on the 6th November 2006 for a

total transaction value of $3.7 billion. Kos Pharmaceuticals was originally founded in

1988 and had pioneered the development of HDL therapies. With this acquisition Abbott

Laboratories acquired Kos Pharmaceuticals’ two lead products i.e. Niaspan® (niacin

extended-release tablets), an extended-release niacin product that raises HDL, or good

cholesterol levels; and Advicor® (niacin extended-release/ lovastatin tablets), a

Niaspan/lovastatin combination product that treats patients with multiple lipid

disorders. In addition Abbott Laboratories acquired late-stage pipeline products

including Simcor®, a fixed-dose combination of Niaspan and simvastatin (generic

Zocor®). This acqisition by Abbott Laboratories compliments Abbott's lipid

management portfolio, which includes on-market TriCor® (fenofibrate tablets); a next-

Page 147: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

147

generation fenofibrate, ABT-335; and a TriCor/Crestor® development program with

AstraZeneca announced in July 2006.

On the 20th April 2007 Abbott Laboratories announced that they had submitted a NDA to

the FDA for a fixed-dose combination (Simcor) of Niaspan® (extended-release niacin)

and simvastatin. Abbott Laboratories anticipate that they will obtain marketing approval

for Simcor by the third quarter 2007 and hope to launch at the beginning 2008.

CRESTOR® (rosuvastatin) and CRESTOR/ABT-335 combination

In July 2006 Abbott Laboratories and AstraZeneca announced that they had created a

collaboration to co-develop and market a combination treatment that will target all

three important blood lipids – LDL-C "bad" cholesterol, HDL-C "good" cholesterol,

and triglycerides – in one single pill as part of a comprehensive treatment regimen.

Under the agreement, the companies will initiate two parallel programs: a CRESTOR®

(rosuvastatin calcium)/TriCor® (fenofibrate tablets) fixed-dose combination and a

CRESTOR/ABT-335 combination.

ABT-335 is Abbott's proprietary next-generation fibrate fenofibrate currently in Phase

III clinical trials under the official title A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind,

Prospective Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of ABT-335 and Atorvastatin

Calcium Combination Therapy to ABT-335 and Atorvastatin Calcium Monotherapy in

Subjects with Mixed Dyslipidemia. TriCor is from the same class of medications called

fibrates. Fibrates help lower triglyceride levels by reducing the amount of VLDL (the

triglyceride-carrying particle that circulates in the blood), which speeds up the removal

of triglycerides

CRESTOR is part of a class of medications called statins, and has been shown to

reduce LDL and raise HDL cholesterol. This combination could potentially address

LDL and HDL cholesterol and triglycerides simultaneously in one single pill.

CRESTOR is currently included in several trials as detailed below to form the basis of

Page 148: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

148

AstraZeneca's application to the FDA for an update to the CRESTOR Prescribing

Information.

The results from the METEOR study, supported by data from the ASTEROID study

and including the ORION trial, formed the basis of the atherosclerosis regulatory

submissions filed in the European Union and the United States in January 2007. These

submissions seek to expand the use of CRESTOR to include the treatment of

atherosclerosis with the purpose of impacting the progression of the disease in patients

in whom lipid-lowering therapy is indicated.

METEOR (Measuring Effects on intima media Thickness: an Evaluation Of

Rosuvastatin) was a 24-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled,

international study to evaluate the effect of CRESTOR 40mg in 984 asymptomatic,

hypercholesterolaemic patients with a low risk of coronary heart disease (Framingham

ten year risk <10 percent) and evidence of sub-clinical atherosclerotic disease as

determined by a thickened carotid artery wall (maximum intima media thickness (IMT)

>1.2 and <3.5 mm). METEOR used B-mode ultrasound imaging to assess and measure

change in mean maximum IMT of 12 vessel sites in the carotid artery.

ASTEROID (A Study To Evaluate the Effect of Rosuvastatin On Intravascular

Ultrasound-Derived Coronary Atheroma Burden) was a 104-week, open label, single-

arm, blinded endpoint study designed to study the effect of CRESTOR 40mg in 507

patients who had undergone coronary angiography and who had evidence of coronary

artery disease (CAD).

ORION (Outcome of Rosuvastatin Treatment on Carotid Artery Atheroma: a

Magnetic Resonance Imaging ObservatioN) was the first study to use advanced, high

resolution MRI to investigate the effect of a statin – CRESTOR - on the change in the

composition of plaques in the carotid artery wall. Forty-three (43) patients with

moderate hypercholesterolemia and established carotid atherosclerosis were treated

with either CRESTOR low dose (5 mg) or high dose (40/80 mg) for two years.

Page 149: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

149

Currently the CRESTOR/ABT-335 combination is in Phase II and a NDA is expected

to be placed on filed by AstraZeneca in 2009. AstraZeneca is also conducting a

comprehensive research and development program into NCEs for the treatment of

dyslipidaemia under the compound names AGI-1067, AZD2479, AZD6610, AZD8450

and AZD4121. It is planned to incorporate these compounds into the on-going

CRESTOR trials to target the different types of dyslipidaemia/ metabolic disturbance.

Table 6.15: AstraZeneca’s Current Anti-Dyslipidaemia Pipeline Segment Compound Target Indication Phase Dyslipidaemia AGI-1067 Atherosclerosis Phase III AZD2479 Dyslipidaemia Phase I AZD6610 Dyslipidaemia Phase I AZD8450 Dyslipidaemia Preclinical AZD4121 Dyslipidaemia Preclinical

Source: AstraZeneca Business Insights Ltd

Synordia

Solway pharmaceuticals have developed Synordia. Synordia contains the active

substances fenofibrate and metformin hydrochloride. The film-coated tablets contain

80 mg fenofibrate and 500 mg metformin, 80 mg fenofibrate and 850 mg metformin, or

54 mg fenofibrate and 850 mg metformin. This single-pill combination was in the

process of being developed by Fournier and is currently in Phase III development in

Europe for the treatment of hyperlipidemia and dyslipidemia due to type 2 diabetes and

metabolic syndrome. Fournier also expects to evaluate the prevention of type 2 diabetes

and cardiovascular events caused by hyperlipidemia and dyslipidemia in metabolic

syndrome. Fournier signed an agreement with Merck-Lipha for worldwide development of

the fixed combination.

However, this combination is for a very niche population and due to dosing complexities it

is most likely that it will be prescribed by specialists. Physicians are likely to prescribe

fenofibrate + metformin to diabetes patients whom they would normally prescribe these

medications individually.

Page 150: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

150

The application for marketing approval of Synordia was submitted in July 2006 to the

EMEA. In December 2006, Fournier withdrew its application to the notified the

Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), stating that they were not

able to respond to requests for additional information within the allowed timeframe. The

withdrawal of the application from the EMEA suggests that the product’s launch will be

severely delayed and as yet the launch date is unknown.

Cost will be the major factor to affect the success of the combination as Tricor loses patent

expiry at the same time as the combination is launched and metformin is already cheaply

available. It will therefore be essential that it is competitively priced. The advantages of

this combination are ease of administration which in turn could help to increase

compliance. Synordia is predicted to gain sales of $120m in 2011, however this is an

optimistic forecast due to the launch date being postponed.

Lapaquistat (TAK-475)

Takeda Pharmaceuticals have been developing at their Global Research and

Development Centre (Europe) in London (UK) a squalene synthase inhibitor or

cholesterol absorption inhibitors known as Lapaquistat (TAK-475). Reserachers from

Takeda reported the results of a phase 2 study evaluating different doses of lapaquistat

compared with atorvastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia at the

American heart Association (AHA) meeting in Chicago November 2006. Lapaquistat

produced significant reductions in LDL-C, total cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B

(apoB), although these reductions were not as great as seen with atorvastatin. Unlike

atorvastatin, however, significant increases were seen in high-density lipoprotein

cholesterol (HDL-C) at higher doses of lapaquistat.

Squalene synthase inhibitors are believed to have potential advantages over statins,

which inhibit 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase. HMG-

CoA catalyzes the conversion of HMG-CoA to mevalonate and thus serves as the

primary rate-limiting enzyme in the hepatic biosynthesis of cholesterol. Squalene

synthase acts downstream of mevalonate, catalyzing the dimerization of farnesyl-

pyrophosphate to squalene. This is the first step in the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway

Page 151: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

151

that is solely committed to the production of cholesterol and researchers believe that

blockade at this site may avoid the effects associated with decreased formation of

isoprenolated intermediates and metabolites in the pathway beyond HMG-CoA

reductase.

Currently Takeda Pharmaceuticals are conducting a series of Phase 3 clinical trials.

The most recently commissioned trials includes one with more than 7000 dyslipidemic

patients in Australia, Canada, Europe, South Africa, South America, and the United

States. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the differences in efficacy and safety of

Lapaquistat (TAK-475) and simvastatim compared to a placebo when administered

together or alone in subjects with primary hypercholesterolemia. In addition, a further

Phase 3 clinical trial which started in September 2006 is being conducted to compare

the effect of Lapaquistat (TAK-475) and ezetimibe on low density lipoprotein (LDL-C)

level in subjects with primary dyslipidemia.

SLx-4090

Surface Logix is developing a novel, orally administered Microsomal Triglyceride

Transfer Protein (MTP) inhibitor known as SLx-4090 for the treatment of dyslipidemia

and familial hypercholesterolemia. SLx-4090 is a potent, small-molecule inhibitor of

MTP that has been designed to act selectively in the enterocytes lining the GI tract. It

prevents the formation of chylomicrons which are used to transport triglyceride and

cholesterol into the systemic circulation. The novelty of SLx-4090 is that it is selective

for enterocytes and is not absorbed into the systemic circulation, and thus allows

activity against fat uptake while avoiding toxicity at other sites of MTP expression

including the liver, heart, testis, ovary, and eye.

SLx-4090 has completed a phase 1 study confirming that it is active in the gut,

significantly blocking fat absorption, but not present in systemic circulation. A repeat

dose study (RDS) and a Phase IIa study in patients with familial dyslipidemia began in

January 2007.

Page 152: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

152

AEGR-733

Bristol-Myers Squibb originally created a study group to search for inhibitors of the

Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein (MTP) after it was discovered that genetic

defects in MTP lead to profoundly low levels of LDL. As a result of the work carried

out they discovered the study drug, originally known as BMS-201038. Bristol-Myers

Squibb then donated it to University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine for use in

clinical trials in patients with severe cholesterol problems. Daniel J. Rader MD,

Director of Preventive Cardiology and the Clinical and Translational Research Center

at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and principal investigator,

designed and carried out a study in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).

FH is a high-risk condition refractory to conventional therapy, and this trial recorded a

remarkable 51% reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) or “bad cholesterol”

levels. Due to the success in the study, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

licensed the drug to Aegerion Pharmaceuticals Inc. for further development as AEGR-

733.

Currently Aegerion is conducting an on-going phase II clinical trial involving AEGR-

733, alone and in combination with Zetia(R) (ezetimibe). In the study, patients treated

with a combination of 10 mg dose of Zetia(R) and 5 mg AEGR-733 achieved a LDL

reduction of 35% after 4 weeks. Patients treated with Zetia(R) alone achieved a 20%

reduction in LDL cholesterol. There was no difference in discontinuation rates between

the patients treated with the combination of AEGR 733 plus 10 mg of Zetia(R) vs.

those treated with 10 mg of Zetia(R) alone.

Final study results for the current trial are expected in the first quarter of 2007.

Aegerion plans to initiate several additional Phase II trials in early 2007, including one

that will examine the LDL-lowering efficacy of various doses of AEGR 733 used in

combination with Lipitor® vs. the agents used as monotherapy

Page 153: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

153

Compound Number 256073 and 501516

GlaxoSmithKline is developing two novel compounds for the treatment of

dyslipidaemia. These are compound number 256073, high affinity nicotinic acid

receptor (HM74A) agonist and 501516 a peroxisome proliferator-activator receptor

(PPAR) delta agonist. Currently compound number 256073 is in Phase I and compound

number 501516 is in Phase II.

The compound number 501516 is being developed in collaboration with Ligand

Pharmaceuticals. Ligand Pharmaceuticals has earned a $1mn milestone payment from

GlaxoSmithKline as a result of GSK’s decision to continue Phase I development of

501516. The collaboration was originally established in 1992 and the research phase

successfully completed in 1997 with the identification of a novel lead structure that

activates selected PPAR subfamily members, and the additional identification of a

different lead compound that shows activity in preclinical models for lowering LDL

cholesterol by up-regulating LDL receptor gene expression in liver cells. Ligand

Pharmaceuticals retains the right to develop and commercialise products arising from

collaborations in markets not exploited by GlaxoSmithKline, or where

GlaxoSmithKline is not developing a product for the same indication.

In 1999, several PPAR leads were advanced to exploratory development. GW501516

was selected for clinical development and Phase II trials were initiated for

cardiovascular disease and dyslipidemia. GW501516 is currently on hold pending the

review of preclinical studies.

LBM642

Novartis have been developing an early stage novel compound under the name of

LBM642. This is a dual agonist of PPAR alpha and gamma, which in a recent

dyslipidemia study suggests that the molecule has the potential for efficacy in

metabolic syndrome, a disease cluster including diabetes, high cholesterol, and obesity.

The results show this compound may overcome many of the disadvantages of other

PPAR alpha/gamma dual agonists, in particular weight gain and edema.

Page 154: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

154

Dyslipidaemia: Current Pipeline and Late Stage Development

Simcor Niaspan® (extended-release niacin) and simvastatin (generic Zocor®) by

Abbott Laboratories. Niaspan is used to raise HDL "good" cholesterol levels, and

simvastatin is effective in reducing LDL "bad" cholesterol levels. Submitted a NDA to

the FDA 20th April 2007.

CRESTOR® (rosuvastatin) and CRESTOR/ABT-335 combination by Abbott

Laboratories and AstraZeneca. Combination treatment that will target all three

important blood lipids – LDL-C "bad" cholesterol, HDL-C "good" cholesterol, and

triglycerides. CRESTOR/ABT-335 combination is in Phase II and a NDA is expected

to be filed by AstraZeneca in 2009. ABT-335 is Abbott's currently in Phase III clinical

trials.

Synordia (Fenofibrate and metformin hydrochloride) by Solway Pharmaceuticals

through acquisition of Fournier in July 2005. Indicated for the treatment of

hyperlipidemia and dyslipidemia due to type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome.

Application for marketing approval of Synordia was submitted in July 2006 to the

EMEA. In December 2006, Fournier withdrew its application to the CHMP. Waiting to

resubmit with new data.

Lapaquistat (TAK-475) by Takeda Pharmaceuticals. Indicated for the treatment of

primary hypercholesterolemia. In Phase 3 clinical trials.

SLx-4090 by Surface Logix. SLx-4090 is a novel Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer

Protein (MTP) inhibitor that is in development for the treatment of dyslipidemia and

familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). SLx-4090 has completed a phase 1 study which

has confirmed that it is active in the gut significantly blocking fat absorption but the

drug is not present in the systemic circulation. A repeat dose study (RDS) and a Phase

IIa study in patients with familial dyslipidemia started in January 2007.

Page 155: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

155

AEGR-733 by Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Indicated for the treatment of familial

hypercholesterolemia (FH). Inhibitors of the Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein

(MTP). Phase II trials

Compound 256073 and 501516 by GlaxoSmithKline in collaboration with Ligand

Pharmaceuticals. Indicated for the treatment of dyslipidemia. Currently compound

256073 is in Phase I and compound 501516 is in Phase II trials.

Page 156: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

156

Anti-Thrombotics

Thrombosis is normally defined as the formation of a solid blood clot in an arterial or

venous vessel. The mechanism of blood coagulation or haemostasis is triggered when

the blood comes in contact with an acutely (wound) or chronically (atherosclerosis)

damaged vessel wall. Deep Vein Thrombosis, or DVT, is a condition in which blood

clots form in a vein deep in the body. A DVT usually forms in the veins in the legs, but

this can also occur in other veins of the body. If a blood clot dislodges and travels in

the blood stream, it may become stuck in the lungs, causing a pulmonary embolism; in

the heart, causing a heart attack; or in an artery in the brain, causing a stroke.

Rivaroxaban (BAY59-7939)

Rivaroxaban (BAY-59-7939) is a new orally available direct FXa inhibitor under

development by Bayer and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical for the treatment of deep vein

thrombosis (DVT) and its secondary prevention. The development product is currently in

late-stage development with the presentation of Phase II clinical studies having been made

at the World Congress of Cardiology at Barcelona, Spain in September 2006.

Rivaroxaban (BAY-597939) is currently in Phase III clinical development for the

primary prevention of VTE after major elective orthopedic surgery. The RECORD

(REgulation of Coagulation in major Orthopedic surgery reducing the Risk of DVT and

PE) study programme began in December 2005 and recruitment is on track and

progressing well. First filing for market authorization in this indication is planned in

late 2007. In addition to these trials further Phase III trials are being conducted to study

stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, and for the treatment of venous

thromboembolism (VTE). These further Phase III trials started recruiting in early 2007

and based on the finalization of study design, the companies are targeting a regulatory

filing of rivaroxaban for these indications in 2010.

Page 157: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

157

Rivaroxaban (BAY-597939) is forecast to gain high sales, reaching $3bn in 2011, making

it the highest selling anti-coagulant. BAY-597939 satisfies the large unmet need for orally

available anticoagulants which are sufficiently potent and safe enough to replace warfarin.

Rendix (dabigatran etexilate, BIBR-1048)

Rendix (dabigatran etexilate, BIBR-1048), in development by Boehringer Ingelheim, is an

oral drug that is converted to dabigatran (BIBR-953), a potent direct thrombin inhibitor.

BIBR-1048 is currently undergoing Phase III clinical trials for the prevention of DVT

following Major Orthopedic Surgery (MOS) and the prevention of stroke in atrial

fibrillation. The half-life of BIBR-1048 is approximately eight hours after single-dose

administration and up to 17 hours with repeated dosing, which could lead to once daily

dosing.

In January 2006, Boehringer Ingelheim officially announced the launch of the RE-

VOLUTION trial program, planned to involve a total of 27,000 patients worldwide. The

RE-VOLUTION program includes the recruitment of 15,000-patient within the RE-LY

Phase III study in SPAF, the 2,000-patient studies RE-MODEL and RE-MOBILIZE in

VTE prevention after knee surgery and the 3,300-patient study RE-NOVATE in VTE

prevention after hip surgery.

For the prevention of DVT, post-orthopedic surgery pivotal studies have been

completed and the first submission for Europe has been completed. A further

submission to gain marketing authorization by the FDA is planned later in 2007 once

additional study results have become available. It is anticipated that filings with the

FDA and the EMEA are expected to take place simultaneously sometime in 2009.

Furthermore, predicted that sales of Rendix could reach $1.5 billion by the year 2011.

Idraparinux

Idraparinux sodium is being developed by Sanofi-Aventis and is a long-acting

anticoagulant that catalyses the inhibition of activated factor X (Xa) by antithrombin,

Page 158: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

158

thus interrupting the coagulation cascade. Idraparinux, like fondaparinux, is a synthetic

analogue of the pentasaccharide sequence in heparins, but because idraparinux is

methylated, its binding affinity is far higher. Idraparinux is administered by a once

weekly subcutaneous injection, resulting in stable therapeutic anticoagulant levels

without the need for monitoring (although the monitoring requirements need

confirmation). Idraparinux sodium is currently in Phase III clinical trials to evaluate its

efficacy and safety versus Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) followed by

adjust-dose Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA) for three to six months (Van Gogh DVT and

PE studies). It is anticipated that the Phase III clinical trials will be completed by early

2008 and marketing authorization obtained in third quarter 2008.

Apixaban

Apixaban (BMS-562247) being developed by Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) is the follow-

on compound to BMS’ oral FXa inhibitor razaxaban for the treatment of thrombosis and is

defined as an orally active inhibitor of coagulation factor Xa with anticoagulant

activity. Apixaban directly inhibits factor Xa, thereby interfering with the conversion

of prothrombin to thrombin and preventing formation of cross-linked fibrin clots. By

March 2005, apixaban had superseded razaxaban and was in Phase II clinical trials.

In October 2006, BMS reported that it had initiated a Phase III trial in the MOS setting.

The company is also investigating the potential of apixaban in the prevention of

thromboembolic events in patients undergoing treatment for advanced cancer. If

successful, this indication could result in marketing synergies between the company’s

cardiovascular and oncology divisions.

SSR-126517

Sanofi-Aventis is developing the long-acting Factor Xa inhibitor SSR-126517 (biotinylated

idraparinux), as a back-up compound for idraparinux. The biotinylation allows idraparinux

to be rapidly removed from the blood using avidin if bleeding becomes uncontrolled. Lack

of reversibility has been a major concern in a long-acting antithrombotic agent and affected

the perception of idraparinux as a contender in the setting of long-term VTE prophylaxis

and SPAF. Currently 2 Phase III clinical trials are on-going:

Page 159: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

159

In March 2006, the Phase III bioequipotency study EQUINOX was initiated,

comparing idraparinux and SSR-126517 in 700 DVT patients in North America,

Europe, South America, Australia, New Zealand, Russia and South Africa. The

primary endpoints were bioequivalence to idraparinux and efficacy of avidin (SSR-

29261) in neutralizing SSR-126517. The secondary endpoint was time to steady-

state anti-Factor Xa activity.

In June 2006, the Phase III trial CASSIOPEA (Official title International,

Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel Group Study of Treatment

With SSR126517E (3.0 mg s.c. Once-Weekly) Versus Oral INR-Adjusted Warfarin

in the Treatment of Patients With Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism) was

initiated, comparing recurrence of VTE events after three months treatment with

once-weekly SSR-126517 or oral warfarin. It is intended that this trial will enroll

3,200 patients with PE in the Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australasia.

Exanta/ximelagatran

Exanta® or Ximelagatran is a new oral anticoagulant. It is a small compound that is

absorbed and converted to the active substance Melagatran. Melagatran can also be

given by injection (as can a number of other anticoagulants). Exanta® interferes with

thrombin which is the final step in the activation of the clotting pathway. This group of

drugs is known as direct thrombin inhibitors.

In February 2006, AstraZeneca withdrew Exanta from the market and halted its

development on patient safety grounds. The decision to discontinue Exanta was based

on new clinical trial data indicating a potential risk of severe liver injury. The data

came from a clinical trial to examine the use of Exanta after orthopaedic surgery to

prevent venous thromboembolism over 35 days, longer than was currently approved for

marketing.

Page 160: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

160

Anti-Thrombotics: Current Pipeline and Late Stage Development

BAY-59-7939 (Rivaroxaban) by Bayer Healthcare/Ortho-McNeil. Indicated for

VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing MOS; long-term secondary prevention of VTE

in patients who have had an initial episode of VTE; and SPAF. Phase II completed. On-

going Phase III, marketing authorisation planned for 2010.

BIBR-1048 (Rendix/dabigatran etexilate) by Boehringer Ingelheim. Indicated for

the prevention of DVT following Major Orthopaedic Surgery (MOS) and stroke in

atrial fibrillation. Phase III.

Idraparinux by Sanofi-Aventis. Indicated for the initial treatment for deep-vein

thrombosis (DVT), or pulmonary embolism (PE). Currently in Phase III trials.

BMS-562247 (Apixaban) by Bristol-Myers Squibb. Indicated for the prevention of

DVT following Major Orthopaedic Surgery (MOS) and the prevention of stroke in

atrial fibrillation. Currently in Phase III trials.

SSR-126517 (Biotinylated Iraparinux) by Sanofi-Aventis. Indicated for the initial

treatment for deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and secondary prevention, or pulmonary

embolism (PE). Phase III.

Exanta® or Ximelagatran by AstraZeneca. Indicated for the initial treatment for

deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and secondary prevention, or pulmonary embolism (PE).

Discontinued from February 2006.

Page 161: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

161

Anti-Arrhythmics

Arrhythmias are defined as irregular heart rhythms, or an abnormality in the timing or

pattern of the heartbeat, causing the heart to beat too rapidly, too slowly, or irregularly.

Tachycardia is the term for a heartbeat that's too fast. Bradycardia is the term for a

heartbeat that's too slow. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common form of

arrhythmia, or irregular heartbeat whilst Ventricular fibrillation is a severe cardiac

arrhythmia that can result in sudden cardiac death. It's a rapid, uncontrolled contraction

of the left ventricle (pumping chamber of the heart). Drugs used to treat cardiac

arrhythmias are provided in Table 6.16.

Comprehensive epidemiology data on the prevalence of arrhythmias is difficult to

come by as a result of the complex nature of the condition. However, accurate data for

AF does exist and suggests a prevalence of chronic AF in the seven major markets of

8.5 million individuals in 2005, which will rise to over 10 million individuals by 2015.

The antiarrhythmics market across the seven major markets has experienced a sharp

decline in sales over recent years, primarily due to the loss of patent protection for

Sanofi-Aventis' Cordarone (amiodarone) in the US in 2002 and with it the emergence

of generic equivalents causing an erosion in pricing. However, moving forward it

appears that the antiarrhythmics market is on the brink of rapid expansion due to the

expected launch of five novel products between 2007 and 2010, and a billion dollar

market looks set to triple in size by 2015.

Page 162: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

162

Table 6.16: Classification of Anti-Arrhythmics Class I — Sodium Class II — Beta Class III — Potassium Class IV — Calcium channel blockers blockers channel blockers channel blockers Disopyramide (Norpace) Acebutolol (Sectral) Amiodarone (Cordarone, Pacerone) Diltiazem (Cardizem, Tiazac) Flecainide (Tambocor) Atenolol (Tenormin) Azimilide (Stedicor) Verapamil (Calan, Covera, Isoptin) Lidocaine (Xylocaine) Betaxolol (Kerlone) Bepridil Mexiletine (Mexitel) Bisoprolol (Zebeta) Dofetilide (Tikosyn) Moricizine (Ethmozine) Carvedilol (Coreg) Ibutalide (Corvert) Procainamide (Procan, Esmolol Sotalol (Betapace) Procanabid, Pronestyl) Propafenone (Rythmol) Metoprolol (Toprol, Lopressor) Tedisamil Quinidine (Various) Nadolol (Corgard) Tocainide (Tonocard) Propranolol (Inderal) Sotolol (Betapace) Timolol (Blocadren)

Source: Business Insights Ltd Business Insights Ltd

Page 163: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

163

Stedicor (Azimilide)

Stedicor (Azimilide) is a class III antiarrhythmic agent that - unlike other agents of its

class - prolongs cardiac repolarization by blocking both the rapidly (IKr) and slowly

(IKs) activating components of the delayed rectifier potassium channel (IK). The most

important consequence of this is apparent rate-independent activity, so that, unlike

other class III antiarrhythmics, azimilide does not lose efficacy at high heart rates.

Both preclinical and Phase II clinical studies demonstrated the efficacy of azimilide and its

safety in the management of supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia. In 1999, the

FDA stated that P&G did not have sufficient data to file for approval, after a second set of

pivotal trials (the ASAP trials) in AF patients failed to show a benefit. However, a meta-

analysis of the four ASAP trials presented at the 2000 AHA Scientific Sessions showed a

significant overall effect of Stedicor compared to placebo. In addition, the results of the

innovative ALIVE trial presented in November 2001 showed the drug had a promising

safety profile. Azimilide has better tolerability and safety data than amiodarone, as well as

a shorter half-life. However, it has the potential to induce torsade de pointes and severe

neutropenia, although the incidences of both are very low.

P&G Pharmaceuticals had forecast to submit Stedicor (azimilide) for approval with the

FDA during 2007, with an expected launch date during the first quarter of 2008. However

the latest information is that it is currently unavailable in Europe either as an approved

product or on a named patient basis. According to P&G Pharmaceuticals there are no

further plans to submit Stedicor (azimilide) for regulatory approval either in Europe or

the US and no further plans to conduct any other large scale clinical trials. This is despite

the on-going larger study called Shock Inhibition Evaluation with AzimiLiDe

(SHIELD) being conducted to confirm the original findings of the pilot study.

Page 164: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

164

Multaq (Dronedarone)

Sanofi-Aventis’ Multaq (dronedarone) is a non-iodinated benzofuran derivative that has

been developed to overcome the limiting iodine-associated adverse effects of the

commonly used antiarrhythmic drug, amiodarone. Dronedarone resembles amiodarone in

its antiadrenergic effects and its ability to lower the heart rate, prolong action potential

duration without a high risk of inducing torsade de pointes, and coronary vasodilator

actions. Preliminary preclinical evidence suggests that, as an “improved” version of

amiodarone, dronedarone confers efficacy benefits on cardiac electrical activity similar to

those of amiodarone but lacks the amiodarone-like chronic electrophysiological

characteristics associated with proarrhythmic effects.

In January 2003, the Antiarrhythmic Trial with Dronedarone in Moderate-to-Severe

Congestive Heart Failure Evaluating Morbidity Decrease (ANDROMEDA) trial was

discontinued following the Data Safety Monitoring Board’s (DSMB’s) recommendation.

The Phase II trial was evaluating dronedarone in high-risk patients with congestive heart

failure (CHF) and ventricular dysfunction. The results indicated a potential excess risk of

death with 24 deaths out of the active treatment group versus 10 deaths on placebo. It is

believed that the excess mortality associated with dronedarone resulted from inappropriate

withdrawal of ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker therapy, and that it did not

result directly from treatment with dronedarone. The DSMB however confirmed that it was

safe to continue the investigation of dronedarone in the further two phase 3 trials of

dronedarone. These were the EURopean Trial In Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter Patients

Receiving Dronedarone for the MaIntenance of Sinus Rhythm (EURIDIS) and the

American-Australian Trial With Dronedarone in Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter Patients

for the Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm (ADONIS). The ERATO (Efficacy and safety of

dronedarone for The control of ventricular rate) trial, amultinational, multi-center,

double-blind, randomized study comparing two parallel groups of patients with

permanent AF was also conducted at the same time. This study was undertaken in 35

centers across nine European countries and enrolled 174 patients with symptomatic

permanent AF of at least 6 months. Both these trials provided positive results in

January 2004 and as a result Dronedarone was filed with the US FDA and the

European Regulatory Authority, EMEA, in June 2005.

Page 165: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

165

However on the 31st August 2006 Sanofi-aventis announced that it had received a non

approvable letter from the U.S. FDA for Multaq (Dronedarone) in the treatment of

Atrial Fibrillation / Atrial Flutter. As part of a related move Sanofi-aventis announced

on the 7th September 2006 that it had taken the decision to withdraw the European

application for Marketing Authorization of Multaq (Dronedarone). In order to make a

more adequate assessment of the benefit-risk balance of the product, the Committee for

Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has requested additional clinical data

which cannot be provided within the timeframe of the current procedure.

Sanofi-aventis plans to resubmit a European application for Marketing Authorization in

atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter during the first semester of 2008. A new filing in the

United States is expected during the first semester of 2008 on the basis of the clinical

data of the ongoing Phase III ATHENA study. ATHENA is a Placebo-Controlled,

Double-Blind, Parallel Arm Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Dronedarone 400mg Bid for

the Prevention of Cardiovascular Hospitalization or Death from Any Cause in patients

With Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter (AF/AFL). The primary objective of this study

was to assess the efficacy of dronedarone in preventing cardiovascular hospitalizations

or death from any cause, and the secondary objective was to evaluate on a large scale

the tolerability of dronedarone in the targeted population of patients suffering from

atrial fibrillation.

Vernakalalant (RSD 1235)

Vernakalalant (RSD 1235) is a new chemical entity (NCE) investigational drug

currently being developed by Cardiome Pharma and their co-development partner,

Astellas Pharma US, Inc and is designed to treat atrial fibrillation with the potential to

overcome the limitations of current drugs used to treat the disease. Its mechanism of

action involves the selective blockade of multiple ion channels in the heart that are

known to be active during episodes of atrial fibrillation. Cardiome Pharma recently

announced that RSD1235 has been assigned the name vernakalant hydrochloride by the

United States Adopted Names (USAN) Council. All future references to RSD1235 (iv)

will now be vernakalant (iv), and references to RSD1235 (oral) will be vernakalant

Page 166: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

166

(oral). The commercial brand name for vernakalant (iv) will be finalized in the near

future.

The drug is currently being developed for two potential applications: (1) vernakalant

(iv) is being evaluated as an intravenous pharmacological converting agent designed to

terminate an atrial fibrillation episode and return the heart to normal rhythm; and (2)

vernakalant (oral) is being evaluated as an oral maintenance therapy for the long-term

prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrence.

Cardiome Pharma has, and is presently, currently conducting a series of pivotal Phase III

trials under the acronym ACT (Arrhythmic Conversion Trial). These trials have

demonstrated that Vernakalant (iv) (RSD 1235) has substantial effects on cardioverting

persistent AF of approximately seven days or less to sinus rhythm. For example, in the first

Arrhythmic Conversion Trial (ACT 1) RSD1235 converted AF to sinus rhythm in

approximately 50% of patients compared with minimal conversion in the placebo group.

As anticipated with a drug whose major electrophysiological alterations occur in atrial

tissue, there was a non-significant increase in the QT interval in these patients. Two Phase

III called ACT 1 and ACT 3 have been completed and the results were released in

December 2004 and September 2005 respectively. An additional Phase 3 study

evaluating patients with post-operative atrial arrhythmia, called ACT 2, and an open-

label safety study evaluating recent-onset AF patients, ACT 4, are ongoing.

Cardiome Pharma announced in August 2005 that they had successfully completed

Phase 1 studies required to advance clinical testing of vernakalant (oral) into a Phase 2

study. In December 2005, they announced the initiation of a Phase 2a pilot study of

vernakalant (oral) for the prevention of recurrence of atrial fibrillation. The double-

blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, dose-ranging study was designed to measure the

safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of vernakalant (oral)

in up to 28 days of oral dosing in patients at risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation. After

announcing the positive results of the Phase 2a pilot study in September 2006 Cardiome

Pharma announced in December 2006 that they had initiated a Phase 2b clinical study of

vernakalant (oral) to further evaluate the safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics and

Page 167: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

167

preliminary efficacy of vernakalant (oral) in up to 90 days of oral dosing in patients at

risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation.

Cardiome Pharma learnt on the 31st May 2006 that the U.S. FDA for the New Drug

Application (NDA) had issued a "refusal to file" for RSD1235 (iv). In accordance with

application regulations, the FDA is required to accept or refuse an application within

60 days of the completion of the filing, which occurred on March 31 2006. Subsequent

to this Cardiome Pharma announced on the 18th December 2006 that Astellas Pharma US

had re-submitted the NDA to seek the approval of the U.S FDA to market Vernakalant

(iv). On the 19th February 2007 notification was made by the FDA that they had

accepted the NDA for review. Cardiome Pharma are currently under a standard 10-

month review, with their Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) date in October

2007. Cardiome Pharma are confident that market Vernakalant (iv) will receive

approval, and that marketing of this product will begin in the first quarter of 2008.

Tecadenoson CVT510

Tecadenoson is a selective A1-adenosine receptor agonist being developed by C.V.

Therapeutics for the reduction of rapid heart rate for patients with paroxysmal

supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). C.V Therapeutics Inc announced on the 27th

November 2002 that they had initiated a Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the

Management of PSVT during Electrophysiologic Study with Tecadenoson

(TEMPEST). This is a Phase III, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial;

181 patients with inducible PSVT in the electrophysiology laboratory were randomized

to receive placebo or one of five dosing regimens of tecadenoson via rapid intravenous

bolus. CV Therapeutics has not yet submitted a new drug application to the FDA or

equivalent application to any other foreign regulatory authorities for tecadenoson.

Pulzium IV (Tedisamil)

Solvay Pharmaceuticals is currently developing tedisamil (KC-8857), a novel

antiarrhythmic with additional anti-ischaemic properties which acts via potassium

channel blockade. This drug can be categorized as a class III antiarrhythmic agent due

Page 168: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

168

to its effects of action potential and QT interval prolongation in these patients. This

agent was initially developed for its anti-ischaemic properties and Phase I trials have

shown tedisamil to be an effective bradycardic agent, as well as causing reverse rate-

dependent QT interval prolongation. Subsequent Phase II results have confirmed that in

patients with ischaemic heart disease, tedisamil had beneficial haemodynamic and anti-

ischaemic effects. Phase III studies in patients with ischaemic heart disease indicated

that tedisamil is an effective agent for the treatment of angina, resulting in a dose-

dependent increase in anginal threshold (with a decrease in anginal attacks, increased

exercise capacity during treadmill exercise and decreased electrocardiographic signs of

exercise induced ischaemia) in comparison to placebo. Solvay Pharmaceuticals

announced on the 25th April 2007 that they had submitted and filed a dossier for

intravenous tedisamil for approval by the US FDA as well as by the authorities of

European Union countries.

Anti-Arrhythmics: Current Pipeline and Late Stage Development

Stedicor (Azimilide) by Proctor and Gamble. A Class III Antiarrhymic agent for the

chronic treatment of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter and paroxysmal supraventricular

tachycardia (PSVT). Class III Antiarrhymic agent as adjunct therapy for patients with

implantable cardioverter defibrillator Company has no further plans to seek regulatory

approval despite continuing with the Phase III SHIELD clinical trial.

Multaq (Dronedarone) by Sanofi-Aventis. Class III Antiarrhymic agent for

maintenance of normal sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter.

Currently in Phase III ATHENA Trial. Company plans to resubmit a European

application for Marketing Authorization first quarter 2008. A new filing in the US is

expected during the first quarter of 2008.

Tecadenoson (CVT510) by CV Therapeutics. An Intravenous selective A1

Adenosine Receptor Agonist/treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.

Phase III TEMPEST Trial on-going. No submission of regulatory approval to-date.

Page 169: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

169

Pulzium IV (TedIsamII) by Solway. Intravenous mixed potassium channel

blocker/rapid conversion of recent onset atrial fibrillation or flutter to normal sinus

rhythm . Phase III on-going. Company submitted and filed NDA dossier 25th April

2007 for approval by the US FDA as well as by the authorities of European Union

countries.

RSD 1235 (Vernakalalant) by Cardiome Pharma and Astellas Pharma.

Intravenous antiarrhymic agent/acute conversion atrial fibrillation to normal sinus

rhythm. Phase III clinical trial 18th December 2006 re-submitted the NDA dossier to

seek the approval of the USFD.

Page 170: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

170

Chapter 7 Appendix

Methodology Statement

The methods used to gather data, information on proprietary technologies,

technological trends, market forecasts and projections used in the preparation of this

report are broadly divided into three different methods.

Primary Data and Information Gathering

Data on individual product and company sales was gathered through extensive

interviews with manufacturers, end users, suppliers, distributors, and other relevant

sources. These interviews typically include marketing managers, sales managers,

distributor managers and owners, sales representatives and managers responsible for

research and development (R&D). In addition, interviews were conducted with senior

managers amongst competing companies to determine the strategic direction and focus

of the technological advances being made and the sales and marketing policies being

adopted. Representatives from the leading suppliers i.e. AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers

Squibb, Boston Scientific Corporation, Cordis Corporation (J&J), GlaxoSmithKline,

Gore Medical, Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, and Mylan

Laboratories were interviewed as well as individuals from other participating

companies; Atritech, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Medicure Inc, Bioabsorbable

Therapeutics, Inc and Occam International B.V. This was done to ensure that the data

derived from competitive interviews was accurate the information was verified and

corroborated by other interviews and by secondary sources such as articles in the trade

press, press releases, annual reports, online databases and government reports.

Secondary Data and Information Gathering

Information was obtained from numerous secondary data sources including statistics

provided by various cardiovascular associations including British Cardiovascular

Intervention Society (BCIS), The European Society of Cardiology (ESC), European

Page 171: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

171

Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), the Health

Economics Research Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, The

Center for Disease Control (CDC), The American Stroke Association, The National

Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), The National Institute for Clinical Excellence

(NICE), The European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA) and the American Heart

Association (AHA). In addition further information was obtained about the incidence

and prevalence of cardiovascular disease from the World Health Organization (WHO),

the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the British

Heart Foundation. Furthermore, the European Cardiovascular Societies were contacted

to determine the potential for the continued treatment of some cardiovascular diseases

using minimally invasive techniques and the level of expectation concerning the

anticipated market introduction of new and novel cardiovascular drugs. A considerable

amount of further information was obtained from numerous publications in the

scientific and trade literature.

While these are believed to be the best secondary sources of data for various disorders

associated with medical devices and pharmaceuticals used in the diagnosis and

treatment of cardiovascular diseases, the estimation of trends from this data is

complicated by periodic changes in reporting and classification methods. In addition to

the use of corporate annual and quarterly reports, data was obtained from security

offering prospectuses, Forms 10-K and 10-Q, and product catalogs and price lists. This

data was used along with other sources of data on company revenues (investment

analysts’ reports, Reuters, Dun & Bradstreet, the CorpTech Directory, and personal

communications from executives of various companies) to develop historic and current

estimates of market revenues. Prices used in projections of market revenues are average

prices paid by the end-user for the products and are derived via supplier and user

quotations or estimates based on typical industry discounts from list prices.

Market Share Analysis and Market Forecast Predictions

Information and data including estimates on market values, growth rates and market

share data were gathered from the methods described and were incorporated into

Page 172: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

172

proprietary computer forecasting and market share analysis models. The forecast model

was used to derive market estimates for future years. It incorporates a rate factor, which

helps determine the speed with which the market develops, which is similar to that

observed for markets for other medical products and is adjusted to match historic data

for the market under analysis.

Page 173: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

173

Glossary

AAV Adeno-Associated Virus

ACC American College of Cardiology

ACE Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme

ACS Acute Coronary Syndrome

AEPD Aortic Embolic Protection Device

AESOP The Automated Endoscopic System for Optimal Positioning

AF Atrial Fibrillation

AHA American Heart Association

AIFA Italian Medicines Agency

ALIVE Trial AzimiLide post-Infarct surVival Evaluation Trial

AMI Acute Myocardial Infarction

AMS Absorbable Metal Stent

ARB Angiotensin Receptor Blocker

Page 174: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

174

ASAP Azimilide Supraventricular Arrhythmia Program

ASD Atrial Septal Defect

ATP AntiTachycardia Pacing

ARB Angiotensin Receptor Blocker

AVR Aortic Valve Replacement

BB Beta Blockers

BCIS British Cardiovascular Intervention Society

BfArM Bundesinstituts für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte (Federal Institute

for Drugs and Medical Devices Germany)

BMS Bare Metal Stent

CABG Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

CAGR Compounded Annual Growth Rate

CCA Common Carotid Artery

CCB Calcium Channel Blocker

CDC Center for Disease Control

CE Conformité Européenne

Page 175: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

175

CETP Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein

CHF Congestive Heart Failure

CHD Coronary Heart Disease

CHMP Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use

CMS Center for Medicare Services

CSCB Centre for Stem Cell Biology

CVA CerebroVascular Accidents

CVRU Cardiovascular Research Unit

DCA Directional Coronary Atherectomy

CVI Chronic Venous Insufficiency

CVD CardioVascular Disease

DES Drug-Eluting Stent

DSMB Data Safety Monitoring Board

DTI Department of Trade and Industry

DVT Deep Vein Thrombosis

Page 176: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

176

EAPCI European Association of PercutaneousCardiovascular Interventions

ECA External Carotid Artery

EGAP End Group Activated Polymer

EMEA European Medicines Evaluation Agency

EPC Endothelial Progenitor Cells

ERAs Endothelin receptor antagonists

ESC European Society of Cardiology

ETA Endothelin Type-A receptor

EPD Embolic Protection Devices

ERS The European Respiratory Society

EU European Union

FDA Fedreal Drug Administration

FH Familial Hypercholesterolemia

FIM First in Man

GDP Gross Domestic Product

Page 177: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

177

GINA The Global Initiative for Asthma

HDL High-Density-Lipoproteins

ICH intraCerebral Haemorrhagic

IDF-Europe The International Diabetes Federation—European Region

IND Investigational New Drug

LAD Left Anterior Descending (LAD) artery

LASER Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation

LDL Low-Density Lipoprotein

LMWH Low Molecular Weight Heparin

LVEF Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

MAA Marketing Authorization Application

MAD Mesenteric Artery Disease

MAI Mesenteric Artery Ischemia

MHLW Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare

MI Myocardial Infarction

Page 178: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

178

MICS Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

MID-CAB Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass

MOS Major Orthopaedic Surgery

MRC Medical Research Council

MTP Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein

MVP Mitral Valve Prolapse

MVR Mitral Valve Repair or Replacement

NCE New Chemical Entity

NCHS National Center for Health Statistics

NDA New Drug Application

Nd:YAG Neodymium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet

NICE Institure for Clinical Excellence

NYHA New York Heart Association

OAS Orbital Atherectomy System

OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

Page 179: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

179

OP-CAB Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass

PACS Premature Atrial Contractions

PAD Peripheral Artery Disease

PAH Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

PC PhosphorylCholine polymer

PCD-Europe Primary Care Diabetes Europe

PCI Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

PDUFA Prescription Drug User Fee Act

PE Pulmonary Embolism

PLA PolyLactic Acid

PLLA Poly L-lactic Acid

PPAR Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor

PTCA Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary or Balloon Angioplasty

PSVT Paroxysmal SupraVentricular Tachycardia

PTMR Percutaneous TransMyocardial Revascularization

Page 180: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

180

PVC Premature Ventricular Contractions

PVD Peripheral Vascular Disease

RA-CAB Robotic Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass

RAS Renin Angiotensin System

RDS Repeat Dose Study

SA SinoAtrial

SHIELD Trial SHock Inhibition Evaluation with AzimiLiDe Trial

SPAF Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

STEMI ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction

SVG Saphenous Vein Grafts

SVT SupraVentricular Tachycardia

TCT Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics

TMLR Transmyocardial laser revascularization

USAN United States Adopted Names

VEGF Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

Page 181: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

181

VF Ventricular Fibrillation

VKA Vitamin K Antagonist

VLDP Very-Low-Density-Lipoproteins

VSD Ventricular Septal Defect

VT Ventricular Tachycardia

VTE Venous ThromboEmbolism

YAG Yttrium Aluminium Garnet

WHO World Health Organisation

Page 182: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

182

Index

Abbott, 12, 15, 51, 59, 64, 72, 73, 75, 78, 79, 83, 112, 128, 135, 146, 147, 154

Acute myocardial infarction, 27

Africa, 21, 141, 151, 159

Angina Pectoris, 25

Anti Anginal, 108

Anti-Arrhythmics, 161, 162, 168

Anti-Dyslipidemics, 143

Anti-Hypertensives, 129

Anti-Thrombotics, 156, 160

Arrhythmiasis, 14, 106, 110

Asia, 21, 74, 75, 79, 99, 159

Atherosclerosis, 14, 23, 24, 106, 112, 113, 114, 149

Atrial Fibrillation, 14, 58, 106, 115, 164, 165, 173, 180

Bare Metal Stents, 67

Bioabsorbable, 66, 82, 83, 170

Boston Scientific, 11, 12, 42, 50, 51, 52, 59, 64, 71, 73, 75, 76, 78, 79, 80, 84, 170

Cardiovascular Disease, iii, 10, 17, 18, 19, 20, 107

China, 11, 19, 22, 42, 46, 47, 48, 49

Cholesterol, 119, 144

Computer, 14, 92, 99, 100

Congestive Heart Failure, 14, 106, 116, 164, 175

Conor MedSystems Inc, 79

Cordis (Johnson & Johnson),, 12, 64, 78

Coronary Stents, 12, 64, 65, 81, 87, 88

Drug Developments, 108, 110, 112, 115, 116, 118, 120, 122, 125

Dyslipidaemia, 149, 154

Everolimus, 12, 73, 75, 79

France, 22, 46, 49, 55, 65, 75, 83, 119, 141

Gene Therapy, 86, 117

Germany, 10, 11, 15, 18, 22, 42, 46, 49, 80, 100, 113, 134, 138, 141, 174

Hypercholesterolemia, 14, 106, 118, 120, 176

Hypertension, 14, 32, 33, 58, 106, 120, 134, 179

India, 11, 19, 22, 31, 42, 46, 47, 48, 49, 145

Investigational New Drug, 114, 142, 177

Italy, 10, 18, 22, 49, 119, 134, 141

Lasers, 101

Medtronic, 12, 54, 64, 73, 75, 76, 78

Minimally, 13, 92, 93, 95, 96, 98, 178

Paclitaxel, 12, 71, 80

Phase I, 14, 58, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 115, 116, 117, 118, 120, 122, 123, 124, 126, 130, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 142, 143, 145, 147, 149, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169

Phase II, 14, 58, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 113, 126, 130, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 142, 143, 145, 147, 149, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169

Page 183: Innovations in Cardiovascular Disease Management

183

Phase III, 58, 108, 130, 134, 135, 136, 137, 139, 147, 149, 154, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169

Pipeline, 136, 149, 154, 160, 168

Preclinical, 138, 149

Renin Inhibitors, 132

Robotic, 14, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98, 100, 180

Sirolimus (Rapamycin), 70

Stroke, 20, 38, 58, 171, 180

Study, 28, 39, 55, 57, 58, 70, 146, 147, 148, 159, 167, 180

Tacrolimus, 12, 72

Thrombosis, 14, 106, 124, 125, 156, 175

Trial, 50, 51, 55, 57, 71, 74, 76, 90, 117, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 173, 180

United Kingdom, 22, 46, 49, 85, 89

United States, 19, 20, 22, 44, 45, 49, 51, 53, 58, 59, 61, 71, 72, 74, 75, 77, 78, 79, 90, 124, 130, 131, 139, 148, 151, 165, 180

Zotarolimus, 12, 73