innsbruck 05 mar_2014 copy

31
………………………………………………………………………….. Improving strain design for biotechnology with constraint- based modelling. POSTER SESSION: PS3-36 Natalie J. Stanford. Pierre Millard. Neil Swainston.

Upload: natalie-stanford

Post on 15-Aug-2015

32 views

Category:

Science


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

…………………………………………………………………………..

Improving strain design for biotechnology with constraint-based modelling.

POSTER SESSION:PS3-36

Natalie J. Stanford.

Pierre Millard.

Neil Swainston.

What does modelling offer us over what we already have?

Gene addition

KO/Over-expression?

Conditions?

Current methods for selection are limited.

The current methods are just not suitable.

…this makes engineering strains difficult, time consuming, and expensive.

Conditionselection.

Gene addition

KO selection/Over-expression

Iterativeselection

Computational approaches allow us to explore different strategies quickly, leading to more effective cell design.

A successful strain of butanol producing E.coli was designed in 2011.

First we needed to modify the reconstructed cell so that, in theory, it could produce butanol.

Conditionselection.

Gene addition

KO selection/Over-expression

Iterativeselection

First we needed to modify the reconstructed cell so that, in theory, it could produce butanol.

Conditionselection.

Gene addition

KO selection/Over-expression

Iterativeselection

Gene addition/KO selection.

Gene addition.

Input

Growth

butanol

Checked using:• Flux Balance

Analysis

How did we use Flux Balance Analysis (FBA) to verify that we could make butanol?

Flux Balance Analysis allowed us to compute feasible cellular flux distributions.

GrowthDefined nutrient

input

butanol

10

GrowthDefined nutrient

input

butanol

10 Objective =Max Growth

Flux Balance Analysis allowed us to compute feasible cellular flux distributions.

GrowthDefined nutrient

input

butanol

10 Objective =Max Growth

10

10

10

10

Flux Balance Analysis allowed us to compute feasible cellular flux distributions.

GrowthDefined nutrient

input

butanol

10 Objective =Max Growth

10

10

10

10

Flux Balance Analysis allowed us to compute feasible cellular flux distributions.

GrowthDefined nutrient

input

butanol

10 Objective =Max butanol

We could verify whether butanol could be produced from our gene additions using FBA.

GrowthDefined nutrient

input

butanol

10 Objective =Max butanol

10

10

We could verify whether butanol could be produced from our gene additions using FBA.

We could also verify whether it was possible for the cells to remain viable whilst producing butanol.

GrowthDefined nutrient

input

butanol

10 Objective =Max Both

GrowthDefined nutrient

input

butanol

10 Objective =Max Both

10

5

5

5

5

We could also verify whether it was possible for the cells to remain viable whilst producing butanol.

Conditionselection.

Gene addition/KO selection.

Over-expression

Iterativeselection

Over-expression

KO/Overexpression selection

• Looked at Flux variability profiles to see which reactions were important.

• Identified competing reactions.

Gene addition/KO selection.Checked using:

• FBA

Gene addition.

Gene addition

Gene addition/KO selection.

Gene addition.

Input

Growth

butanol

Checked using:• Flux Balance

Analysis

How did we use Flux Variability Analysis (FVA) to identify important modifications within the

cell?

As we saw in the earlier example, growth could use two different pathways.

GrowthDefined nutrient

input

butanol

10 Objective =Max Growth

GrowthDefined nutrient

input

butanol

10 Objective =Max Growth

Max fluxMin flux.

Flux variability analysis showed us the minimum and maximum flux each reaction could carry, providing the right combination of other

reactions were in place.

GrowthDefined nutrient

input

butanol

10/10 Objective =Max Growth

10/0

10/0

10/0

10/10

10/0

10/0

10/0

Max fluxMin flux.

Flux variability analysis showed us the minimum and maximum flux each reaction could carry, providing the right combination of other

reactions were in place.

We could use this to identify reactions that were important for generating butanol, and those that competed.

GrowthDefined nutrient

input

butanol

10

Max fluxMin flux.

Objective:Max butanol subject to 4 units of growth

4

GrowthDefined nutrient

input

butanol

10/10

Max fluxMin flux.

Objective:Max butanol subject to 4 units of growth

4/4

10/6

4/0

4/0

4/0

4/0

4/0

6/6

We could use this to identify reactions that were important for generating butanol, and those that competed.

GrowthDefined nutrient

input

butanol

10/10

Max fluxMin flux.

Objective:Max butanol subject to 4 units of growth

4/4

10/6

4/0

4/0

4/0

4/0

4/0

6/6

We could use this to identify reactions that were important for generating butanol, and those that competed.

GrowthDefined nutrient

input

butanol

10/10

Max fluxMin flux.

Objective:Max butanol subject to 4 units of growth

4/4

10/6

4/0

4/0

4/0

4/0

4/0

6/6

We could use this to identify reactions that were important for generating butanol, and those that competed.

Conditionselection.

Gene addition/KO selection.

Over-expression

Iterativeselection

Over-expression

KO/Overexpression selection

Conditionselection.

Condition selection.• Could be

identified using phenotypic phase plane analysis.

Gene addition/KO selection.

Gene addition/KO selection.Checked using:

• FBA

Gene addition.

Gene addition

Gene addition/KO selection.

Gene addition.

Input

Growth

butanol

Checked using:• Flux Balance

Analysis

• Looked at Flux variability profiles to see which reactions were important.

• Identified competing reactions.

Did we manage to predict a computational strain that was similar to the experimental strain?

Reverse betaOxidation cycle

Anoxic conditions.

We predicted 4 knockouts, and anoxic conditions were required to generate butanol.

The strain we predicted using these techniques showed modified functions that were similar to the laboratory engineered strain.