insect sting allergy and venom immunotherapy david b.k. golden, m.d. johns hopkins university,...
TRANSCRIPT
Insect Sting Allergy and Venom Immunotherapy
David B.K. Golden, M.D.
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
History of Reaction to Insect Stings(Skin Test Positive Patients)
No reaction
Large Local
Cutaneous Systemic
Anaphylaxis
INSEC T ALLERGY CASE 1
A 32 yea r old man with a his tory of seve re and
prolonged swelling from previous insec t stings is
stung on the leg. Aft er 15 minu tes he develops
gene rali zed hives, swelling of lips and hands, with
no throat tigh tness or dizziness. Symp toms resolve
after 1 hou r. The nex t day the E.D. treats his seve re
leg s welling and discha rges him on antibio tics.
Severe swelling 24 hrs after a sting should be treated with:
A. Antibiotics C. Antihistamine E. Epinephrine
B. Prednisone D. Venom immunotherapy
INSECT ALLERGY CASE 1b
A 12 yea r old boy on the school cross -coun try track
team is running in a wooded area when he is stung
twice on the arm. Within 5 minu tes he develops
throat tigh tness follo wed rapidly by gene rali zed
hives and angioedema, di zziness and dyspnea. He is
helped back to school and met by pa ramedics who
adminis ter epineph rine and tr anspo rt him to the
emergency depa rtment for prolonged obse rvation.
Venom immunotherapy:
A. Is not necessary (“He’ll outgrow it”) B. Is dangerous
C. is only partially effective D. Is forever E. None of the above
Diagnosis of Insect Sting Allergy(Indications for Venom Immunotherapy)
• History
• Venom Skin Test (RAST)
• Natural History
Symptoms and Signs of Insect Sting Anaphylaxis in Adults and Children
Frequency (%)
Symptoms or Sign Adults Children
Cutaneous only 15 60
Urticaria/angioedema 80 95
Dizziness/hypotension 60 10
Dyspnea/wheezing 50 40
Throat tightness/ 40 40Hoarseness
Loss of consciousness 30 5
Epidemiology of Venom Allergy
• History of systemic reaction in 0.5%-3.0% of the population
• Positive venom skin test or RAST in 15%-25% of the population.
• Transient positive skin test or RAST may occur after uneventful sting.
• Presence of IgE venom antibody not necessarily predictive of clinical reactivity.
Correlation of Yellow Jacket Venom RAST and Skin Tests (Golden - JAMA 1989)
Venom Skin TestRAST (ng/L) Positive Negative
< 1 (negative) 9 (24%) 190 (89%)
≥ 1 (positive) 29 (76%) 23 (11%)
1.0 - 1.9 8 9 2.0 - 2.9 5 4 3.0 - 4.9 4 5 ≥5.0 12 5
Total 38 213
History Positive Patients with Negative Venom Skin Tests
Possible explanations:
Not true allergic reaction (no objective signs)
Allergy “outgrown”
Mastocytosis (~1 % of insect allergic patients)
Not detected: - Refractory period (anergy)
- RAST positive
Diagnostic Venom Test Reactivity after Systemic Sting Reaction
(Goldberg and Confino-Cohen; JACI 1997)
Time after sting 1 week 4 - 6 week Any
Skin Test Positive 20 (53%) 15 (39%) 35 (92%)
RAST Positive 24 (63%) 8 (21%) 32 (84%)
Any Positive 30 (79%) 8 (21%) 38 (100%)
Venom Skin Test / RAST in History Positive Patients (Golden - JACI 2001)
Total history positive patients screened: (N=307)
ST positive 208 (68%)
ST negative 99 (32%)
ST - neg/RAST neg 56 (57%) (18%)
ST - neg/RAST positive 43 (43%)
RAST 1 - 3 ng/ml 36
RAST 7 - 243 ng/ml 7
Diagnosis of Insect Allergy in Patients With Positive History (Systemic)
Skin test positive 68%
ST negative / RAST positive 14%
ST neg / RAST neg / sting challenge positive 1%
No sting allergy 17%
Low Risk Sub-Groups of Patients With Positive Venom Skin Tests
Risk of Sting Reaction History Systemic Reaction
Children - Cutaneous Systemic 10 %
Large Local 5 - 10 %
Insect Sting Allergy in Children (1978 -1987)(Schuberth, Valentine, Kagey-Sobotka, Lichtenstein)
History N Disposition of Patients
Cutaneous 462 Untreated vs. VITsystemic • untreated (n=352)
• treated (VIT) (n=110)
Mod-severe 345 VIT advisedsystemic • untreated (n=99)
• treated (VIT) (n=246)
Large Local 226 No VIT
TOTAL 1033
Summary Of Sting Reactions 490 Stings in 180 Patients over 9 Yrs
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Severe SRMild SRLarge LocalNormal
0.4%
10 %
25%
65%
Natural History of Large Local Reactions
Diagnostic Test Sting Reaction Skin Test RAST Systemic LL
Graft et al (J Ped 1984) 105/125 2/54 20/54 children (84%) (4%) (37%)
Mauriello et al (JACI 1984) 105/133 67/133 1/28 21/28 adults and children (79%) (50%) (4%) (75%)
Golden et al (JACI 1984) 38/52 5/52 adults (73%) (10%)
Abrecht et al (Clin Allergy 1980) 27/40 29/40 children and adults (68%) (73%)
Repeat Systemic Reaction In Sting Allergic Patients
STUDY (YEAR) N SYSTEMIC (%)
GOLDEN (1981) 115 75 (65%)
HUNT (1978) 23 19 (61%)
SETTIPANE (1979) 119 72 (61%)
LANTNER (1989) 18 11 (61%)
REISMAN (1992) 220 124 (56%)
GALATAS (1994) 27 13 (48%)
PARKER (1982) 16 7 (44%)
DVORIN (1984) 19 8 (42%)
BLAAUW (1985) 86 29 (39%)
FRANKEN (1994) 228 90 (39%)
vanderLINDEN (1994) 324 96 (30%)
TOTAL 1195 544 (46%)
Risk of Systemic Reaction in Untreated Skin Test Positive Patients
Original Sting Reaction Risk of Systemic Reaction Severity Age 1 - 9 yrs 10 - 20 yrs No reaction Adult 17 %
Large local All 10 % 10 %
Cutaneous Child 10 % 5 % systemic Adult 20 % 10 %
Anaphylaxis Child 40 % 30 % Adult 60 % 40 %
INSEC T ALLERGY CASE HISTORY
A 28 yea r old man was stung by a yello w jacket and
rapidly developed gene ralized hives, dyspnea and
throat tightness, follo wed by seve re dizziness with
nea r-unconsciousness. He responded well to
eme rgency medical treatment. He was discha rged
with no specific recommendation except for a
presc ription for an epineph rine injection device.
He presents to the alle rgist because his uncle died
from insect sting alle rgy and his family and docto rs
have told him the next sting will surely kill him.
Previous stings had caused no abno rmal reaction.
Trea tment Stung System ic (%)
Venom (n=19) 18 1 (5%)*
W B E (n=20) 11 7 (64%)
Placebo (n=20) 12 7 (58%)
* afte r crossover, tota l 1/55 = 2% on VI T (p<0.01 )
Controlled Trial of Venom Immunotherapy(Hunt et al, NEJM 1978)
Venom Immunotherapy Treatment Protocols
Conservative Moderate Liberal
Regimen Traditional Modified Rush Rush
Weeks to Mc 20 - 26 8 1
Dose (µg) 50 100 200
Maintenance (wks) 4 6 - 8 12
Premedication During Venom Immunotherapy
Terfenadine Placebo
Brockow et al (JACI 1997)
Systemic during VIT 1/82 (1%) 6/39 (15%)
Large Local during VIT 20/80 (24%) 17/39 (45%)
Muller et al (JACI 2001)
Systemic during VIT 5/24 (21%) 13/23 (56%)
Systemic to challenge sting 0/20 6/21 (28%)
Discontinuing Venom Immunotherapy: Reported Studies and Criteria
Author Patients Criteria
Studied Proposed
Graft (1984) children 5-7 years* 5 years
Urbanek (1985) children RAST neg RAST neg
Randolph (1986) adults & children RAST neg RAST neg
Keating (1991) adults & children 2-10 years* 5 years
Haugaard (1991) adults 3-7 years* 3 years
Muller (1991) adults & children 3-10 years* 3 years*
Reisman (1993) adults & children 1-6 years 3+ years
Lerch (1998) adults & children 3-10 years* 5 years#
Golden (1998) adults 5-7 years 5 years#
* Negative sting challenge included as criterion for discontinuation.# Excluding patients with life-threatening history, honeybee allergy or systemic reaction during VIT .
Discontinuing Venom Immunotherapy(Lerch and Muller 1998)
N Systemic P (pts/stings) Reaction (%)
VIT Duration <50 months 118 pts 21 (18%) >50 months 82 pts 4 (5%) 0.007
Insect Honeybee 120 pts 19 (15.6%) Vespid 80 pts 6 (7.5%) 0.08
Time since D/C VIT 1-2 years 444 stings 20 (4.5%) 3-5 years 211 stings 30 (14%) 0.001 6-7 years 64 stings 5 (8%)
Discontinuing Venom Immunotherapy(Golden et al JACI 2000)
Systemic reaction
Venom Skin Test Positive 10% / sting
Venom Skin Test Negative 10% / sting
Off VIT 3 yrs (1 - 4 yrs) 10% / sting
Off VIT 10 yrs (5 - 13 yrs) 10% / sting
Cumulative risk (10 yrs) 17%
COLLABORATORS
Lawrence M. LichtensteinAnne Kagey-Sobotka Robert G. HamiltonPhilip S. Norman Timothy J. CraigDenise C. KellyKristin ChichesterTina D. Grace
General Clinical Research Center (GCRC):Johns Hopkins Bayview, Baltimore, MDPenn State University, Hershey, PA
Funding: NIH AI08270 (L. M. Lichtenstein, P.I.)