inside the idaho state police forensic services laboratories
DESCRIPTION
Inside the Idaho State Police Forensic Services Laboratories. Matthew Gamette Laboratory Improvement Manager. Judges Webinar January 8, 2014. Overview. Organization of ISPFS Services of the ISPFS Laboratory System Accreditation Turnaround Times General Challenges - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
INSIDE THE IDAHO STATE POLICE FORENSIC SERVICES
LABORATORIES
Judges Webinar January 8, 2014
Matthew GametteLaboratory Improvement Manager
Overview
Organization of ISPFS Services of the ISPFS Laboratory System Accreditation Turnaround Times General Challenges New and Upcoming Customer Service
Enhancements
Introduction to ISPFSISPFS Coeur d’Alene Laboratory
ISPFS Meridian Laboratory
ISPFS Pocatello Laboratory
http://www.isp.idaho.gov/forensics/index.html
Introduction to ISPFSService Coeur d'Alene Meridian Pocatello
Controlled Substances Analysis X X X Crime Scene General X X X Crime Scene Clan Labs X X X Fire/Arson Evidence Analysis X Firearms/Toolmarks X Footwear/Tiretrack X DNA X Biology Screening X DNA Database X Latent Print Processing X Latent Print Comparison X Blood Alcohol X X X Breath Alcohol Instrument Calibration X X Drugs in Blood Limited X Drugs in Urine X X
Equivalent Staffing
Controlled Substances 6Toxicology 3Biology/DNA 4DNA Database 3Biology Technical Staff 1Blood Alcohol 3Breath Alcohol 1Latent Prints 5.5Shoe/Tire 0.5Firearms 1Evidence Staff 7
Stuart Jacobson—• Firearms• Blood Alcohol • Controlled Substances
Accreditation
• First accreditation 1987
• First ISO 17025:2005 accreditation in 2007
• Reaccreditation every 5 years
• Current accreditation through 2017
• Over 500 management and analytical requirements
• Yearly internal audit and external assessment of each lab
• Annual report of corrective actions, personnel changes, proficiency
testing
Turnaround Times:
Strategic Goal Discipline Average Turnaround
60 days Biology Screening 41 days
60 days DNA 28 days
90 days DNA Database <30 days
30 days Blood Alcohol 22 days
30 days Controlled Substances
13 days
90 days Fingerprints 94 days
60 days Firearms/Toolmarks 2 cases >60 days*
45 days Fire Debris 2 cases >45 days*
90 days Shoe/Tire Analysis 6 cases >90 days**
45 days Toxicology 18 daysTurnaround times are calculated from the date the evidence submission is complete
Challenges: Court Testimony
• Competing subpoenas from different counties
• Distance
• Travel and waiting time
Scott HellstromPocatello ChemistJanuary 29, 2014
2010 Ada County (CDA lab scientists only)• 146.5 hours analyst time (3.6 weeks)• ~$13,890.00 in salary and travel costs• 6 testimonies for 6.75 hours total• ~$2057.00/hour for expert testimony
Challenges: Court Testimony
Jeremy JohnstonBreath Alcohol Discipline Leader
Solutions: Video Testimony
New Rule 43.3. Forensic Testimony by Video Teleconference. This new rule allows forensic testimony to be submitted in court proceedings via simultaneous video teleconference. Everyone must be able to see and hear each other and simultaneously communicate. The party wishing to present by video teleconference must give the other party 28 days notice and the other party must object or agree in writing no later than 14 days before the proceeding. The video testimony is recorded in the same manner as any other testimony, and it is up to the party offering the testimony to coordinate the audio visual feed into the courtroom.
There is no duty placed on the court.
Challenges: Court Testimony
• Multiple state lab witnesses for same testimony
• ISPFS experts not a party to the case
Challenges: Slowdowns
• Instrumental breakdowns (increased with aging
instruments)
• Validation of new instrumentation
• Batching (waiting for enough samples to run)
• Rush requests (slows the other wait times)
• Obtaining all the necessary items on submission
**Turnaround time starts when submission is complete**
Solutions: Slowdowns
• New instruments and maintenance agreements
• Partner with universities and vendors for validation work
• Decreasing backlogs so that rush requests are not necessary
• Training user agencies and using software to solve submission problems
Challenges: Training
• Retention of trained scientists
• Recruitment of qualified applicants
• Training periods:
• Latent Prints—2 years
• DNA/Biology—1 to 2 years
• Toxicology—1 to 2 years
• Firearms—2 to 5 years
• Chemistry—6 months to 1 year
Challenges: Drug Court Prelims
• Seeking input from the courts and prosecutors
• Presumptive screening programs for court preliminary
hearings
• Cut down turnaround times
Challenges: Defense Experts
• New Idaho State Law
• Accreditation
• Security
• Contamination
• Efficiency
Challenges: Extensive Discovery
• Requests for documents not applicable to the case (boilerplate)
• Requests for information outside the rules of discovery
• Overbearing requests slow down lab personnel
Lab Response:• Provided in email PDF or on ILIMS as a PDF• Available on our website• Available for review at the lab• Seemingly outside the scope of ICR 16• Not applicable to this case
New Website
Improvements
• Online and On-demand
• More information, more difficult, and standardized
• Virtual instruments for practice scenarios
• Written test and practical (hands-on) proficiency testing
• All certificates published online
• Online prelog of evidence• Online status updates• Online reporting and discovery
• Completely paperless• Tablets in the lab• Automated reporting• Efficient
Training
• Evidence collection courses using standard presentations• Biology/DNA• Latent Impression/Footwear and Tire impressions• Prosecutor DUI boot camp
Officers of the court free training:• http://nij.gov/training/Pages/forensics.aspx• http://projects.nfstc.org/otc/index.html
Major Clark [email protected]
Discussion of presumptive testing