inside this issue president’s message · karl slaikeu, ph. d. chorda conflict management services...
TRANSCRIPT
President’s Message ....................... 1
TAM Annual Conference ............... 2
TAM 2014 TAM Annual Conference
Late Registration Form ................... 3
TAM 2014 Annual Conference
Sponsors ......................................... 4
2014 TAM’s Annual Conference
Speakers .......................................... 6
Courtside with Mike Amis
Vigilance Still Required:
All Eyes Are On Texas ................... 7
Nominees for TAM’s Board of
Directors for 2014 ........................... 8
Returning Members to TAM’s Board
Of Directors for 2014...................... 9
International Peacemakers
A Path to Peace in Argentina:
Equipo IMCA Blazes a Trail ........ 10
Change My Mind —If You Can! .. 12
Entering the Twittersphere............ 14
The Mediator’s Toolbox
Listen With Your Heart ................ 15
Spotlight on TAM Member
Dr. Ralph Steele ............................ 16
TAM Welcomes New Members ... 16
Dealing with Difficult
Personalities .................................. 17
TMCA Update .............................. 18
Calendar of Events ........................ 18
© 2014 The Texas Association of Mediators,
1Inc. All rights reserved. The Texas Mediator
provides a forum for sharing many view-
points. The views expressed are those of
the individual authors and, unless other-
wise stated, do not necessarily reflect the
views of the Association.
PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE
From Melynda Gulley
VOLUME 26, NUMBER 3, WINTER 2014
INSIDE THIS ISSUE
Happy New Year!
As most of us contemplate our New Year’s
resolutions for 2014, I hope you will consider
making at least one of them reflect the commit-
ment you will have to your Profession, Media-
tion. Here are a few suggestions….
1. I will study the Ethical Guidelines for
Mediators found on the TAM website each
night before I go to bed.
2. I will warn my family and friends of the
dangers of the adversarial system of
resolving disputes by displaying on the
walls of my office and home, posters of
really scary trial attorneys.
3. I will ponder daily how best to share my
passion and knowledge of mediation with
the world.
4. I will make sure my mediation clients
know that the difference between litigation
and mediation is lots of zeroes, lots of
hours and the elimination of any relation-
ship with whom you may go to court.
5. I will continue to feed my passion for
mediation by blogging about it wherever
and whenever possible.
6. I will work to break through my client’s
disabling façade of fabricated thinking by
speaking the truth. (a novel idea)
7. I will bring up the topic of mediation in
every conversation and pursue it until I
have converted all my associates to a life of
mediating.
8. I will overcome those nattering nabobs of
negativism often called clients by
__________. (you fill in the blank.)
9. I will continue to work on my neutrality
until I have no opinion on anything (is this
really possible?) or I will be impartial and
maintain my personal positions without
allowing them to interfere in my work.
10. I won’t take any mediation where I know
of a conflict unless, of course, I am sure I
can be fair???? (seriously?!)
I hope you see
the satire in
these sugges-
tions; the idea
is to take these
silly ideas for
resolutions and
turn them into
something that will keep you alert, engaged and
passionate for the Profession of Mediation.
This is my last letter as president to the TAM
membership. As a reminder to you all, my
theme for the year has been, “Mediation the
Profession,” indicating that our work has come
into its own. As any new entity, we are having
growing pains -- Rule # 169, for instance.
TAMC, Texas Attorney Mediators Coalition, a
sister organization with similar goals to TAM,
has hired a lobbyist to promote our position to
those who need to understand and know what
we do and what is required to do it effectively
and efficiently. This effort will keep mediation
from being marginalized, moving us to the next
level and ensuring we are heard and that our
profession survives.
It has been a busy year, but we have stayed
engaged in promoting our goal throughout the
year. The goal I set for this year was to contin-
ue, in a significant way, educating the public
about mediation, ensuring that mediation would
be the first option considered when needing to
resolve a dispute of any kind. We did just that
in our video series, Got a Dispute, You need to
Mediate That. This series can be used for years
to come. I hope to promote it to associations
such as Human Resources to assist in educating
their memberships on the benefits and varieties
of mediation. You can find the link on our
website www.txmediator.org .
February 21st and 22nd of 2014 brings the
annual Texas Association of Mediator Confer-
ence to Austin, co-chaired by Toylaine Spencer
continued on page 13
THE TEXAS MEDIATOR www.txmediator.org
THE TEXAS MEDIATOR 2 www.txmediator.org
February 21 and 22, 2014
Austin, Texas
Hyatt Regency Hotel Lady Bird Lake
12.5 hours of Continuing Education with 3.75 Ethics
(MCLE approval pending)
Registration Rates
$255.00 for 2014 TAM Members, Candidates and Friends of TAM $330.00 for Non-Members
$150.00 for Full Time Students
GO TO THE TAM WEBSITE FOR SCHEDULE, CONFERENCE SPEAKER BIOS, SESSION INFORMATION AND TO REGISTER
Register online now http://www.txmediator.org/conference/
Please contact Toylaine Spencer, [email protected], or Erich Birch, [email protected] if you need more information or have questions.
THE TEXAS MEDIATOR 3 www.txmediator.org
LATE REGISTRATION FORM For efficiency and all credit card payments, please register online at www.txmediator.org
Name: _____________________________________________________________________
Organization: ________________________________________________________________
Address: ___________________________________________________________________
City: _________________________________State: ____Zip Code: ____________________
Email address: ______________________________________________________________
Phone: __________________________________ Fax: ______________________________
Registration includes entry into all sessions, conference materials, lunch Friday, our Friday evening re-
ception and Continental breakfast and lunch Saturday.
2014 MEMBERS, CANDIDATES OR FRIENDS REGISTRATION RATES
___ Late Registration $255.00 Include 2014 dues with your registration
___ 2014 Membership Dues – Full Member $75.00
___ 2014 Membership Dues – Candidate for Membership $50.00
___ 2014 Membership Dues – Friend of TAM $50.00 NON-MEMBER REGISTRATION RATES
___ Late Registration $330.00
___ Full Time Student Registration (Proof of full-time student status required) $150.00
___ Conference Speakers $199.00
Please make checks payable to TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF MEDIATORS (TAM)
and return completed form with payment to: TAM Conference Registration
PO Box 2537 Galveston, Texas 77553-2537
THE TEXAS MEDIATOR 6 www.txmediator.org
Erich Birch Attorney-Mediator
Birch, Becker, & Moorman, LLP
Austin
Paul Blanke Mediator/Arbitrator
Austin
Ben Cunningham Attorney-Mediator
Galton, Cunningham & Bourgeois,
P.L.L.C. and The Lakeside Mediation
Center
Austin
Kris Donley Executive Director
Dispute Resolution Center
Austin
Jonathan Elston, MSc., Q.Med. Mediate to Go® (mediate2go.com)
Montreal, Quebec
Lic. Roberto Montoya González State Director, Center for Alternative
Mechanisms for the Solution of Conflicts
of the Judicial Branch of the State of
Tamaulipas (Mexico)
Melanie E. Grimes TMCA Credentialed Distinguished Me-
diator
Dallas
Diane Harvey, LCSW Clinical Social Worker / Mediator
Austin
Brad Heckman Chief Executive Officer
New York Peace Institute
New York City
John Kenyon TMCA Advanced Credentialed Mediator
Houston
Erin Lawler Attorney-Mediator and Public Policy
Specialist
Texas Council for Developmental Disa-
bilities
Austin
Kevin Leahy Attorney at Law
Knowledge Advocate, LLC
Austin
Jim Melamed Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer
Mediate.com
Eugene, OR
Lic. Armando Villanueva Mendo-
za President of the Supreme Court of Jus-
tice of the State of Tamaulipas, Mexico
Mary Ann Redeker-Perez Alternative Dispute Resolution Coordi-
nator
Better Business Bureau
Austin
Joe Perez Regional Risk Solutions Manager
H-E-B Grocery Company, LP
Edinburg
Colin Rule Founder and Chief Operating Officer
Modria.com
San Jose, CA
Larry Schooler Community Engagement Consultant
City of Austin
Austin
Susan B. Schultz Program Director
Center for Public Policy Dispute Resolu-
tion at The University of Texas School of
Law
Austin
Karl Slaikeu, Ph. D. Chorda Conflict Management Services
Austin
Hon. John J. Specia, Jr. Commissioner
Texas Department of Family and Protec-
tive Services
San Antonio
Mary Thompson Corder/Thompson & Associates
Austin
Michael Thompson, Jr. Shareholder
Wright & Greenhill, P.C.
Austin
Lue Wagner Attorney-Mediator
Hunter Wagner PLLC
Austin
Marsha Woodard Environmental Litigation Case Manager
Union Pacific Railroad
Houston
Walter A. Wright, Associate Professor
Legal Studies Program of the Depart-
ment of Political Science at Texas State
University
San Marcos
2014 TAM’S
Annual Conference Speakers
What do Walmart and the corner grocery have
in common? They are both members of the
Texas Retailers Association (TRA). Why?
Because both are affected by our state govern-
ment, and they know they need a representative,
TRA, to be in Austin to speak up when
needed. So, too, mediators learned in 2013 that
they were the only voices who can speak up for
Texas mediation. Like the Texas Retailers
Association is for its members, Texas Attorney-
Mediators Coalition (TAMC) is the only
organized voice for the clients, attorneys, and
judges who have benefited so much from court-
annexed mediation over the years.
TAMC must remain vigilant – this is a time of
great scrutiny over all aspects of the civil justice
system. There is increasing concern over the
loss of the civil jury trial and the growth of a
true alternative system of justice, binding
arbitration. TAMC’s purpose is to enhance and
strengthen the existing civil trial system through
the use of court-annexed mediation.
Chapter 154 forms our founda-
tion. Although we may move beyond it, it is
always the foundation on which all else rests. Oh, I know, you say, “Mike, with the 2013
Texas Legislature in recess, enjoying 2014 as
an off-year, what’s the big deal, take a cool pill
and relax.” Tom Forbes, our counsel, wisely
cautions us that nowadays the legislature is
never really out of session. Indeed both the
House and the Senate, through their leadership,
have issued “interim charges,” which call upon
various committees to study certain issues to
determine what legislation, if any, should be
advisable, for the 2015 session. To date, no
interim charges have been announced which
appear directly, or indirectly, to bring into
question the status quo of the civil justice
system or court-annexed mediation. Whew –
so far! But, things can change and change
quickly, and we must be ever alert, building
strong fences, and being ready to respond to
any threat, however well-meaning it may be.
We know that Rule 169, which governs
expedited trials and court-ordered mediation
under the rule, calls for plaintiffs to state in their
pleadings categories of damages over and
above $100,000. In November, 2012, then-
Justice, now Chief Justice, Nathan Hecht of the
Texas Supreme Court observed it was his hope
that the expedited trial process – not limited to
jury trials – would “help us get our business
back from arbitration and make it possible for
young lawyers to get more courtroom experi-
ence.” He went on to say, “I hope it will be an
enormous boost for the civil trial sys-
tem” (“Texas Lawyer” article, November 16,
2012). An October, 2013 program featured a
premier civil trial advocate, Steve Sussman of
Houston, who remarked, “Arbitration is
winning the dispute resolution competition
against jury trials.” The response? Quicker,
cheaper trials; cut down on costs. We must
realize this is a national concern, and policy-
makers in many states are developing and
implementing expedited trial pro-
grams. Prominently, New York, New Jersey,
South Carolina, Colorado, Arizona, Nevada,
Utah, and California all have expedited trial
programs. But there is a big difference making
Texas unique. The eyes of the nation are truly
Texas: it is the only state making the expedited
trial process mandatory.
With the on-going effort to lower the cost of
trials in order to compete with arbitration, it will
be tempting for courts, if not legislatures, to cut
out “mandatory ADR.” Again, this is a national
conversation. But, wait, what is “mandatory
ADR?” In another state “mandatory ADR” may
be, usually is, something entirely different from
Texas court-annexed mediation. Often, as in
Washington and Oregon, “mandatory ADR” is
a statutorily-required procedure of non-binding
arbitration which calls for the parties either to
accept the arbitrator’s award as the court’s
judgment without any right of appeal or to
reject the award and press on toward trial and,
potentially, appeal. Or, “mandatory ADR,”
used by a policy-maker, may just as often refer
to binding, contractual arbitration. Texas court-
annexed mediation is always discretionary with
a trial court. And, it may be initiated by a party
as well as a referring court.
As I hope you can see, there is a conversation
going on, a national conversation with emphasis
on the Texas experience, and we mediators
need to be, must be, there to explain, clarify,
advocate what has been so good for so many
over the past 27 years. TAMC can be strong or
weak depending on whether Texas mediators,
both great and small, like Walmart and the
corner grocer, who both come together for their
common good, will support this statute
benefiting all Texans. Have you joined
TAMC? If not, please help out. Go to
www.texasamc.org, and join. You’ll be glad
you did.
Mike Amis is a Co-
Chair of the Texas
Attorney-Mediators
Coalition (TAMC).
He is board certified
in civil trial law and
was trained in
mediation by the
Dallas Bar's
program headed by
Steve Brutsche´ in
1989. Mike has been
a full time mediator since 1990 and has
mediated over 1,500 cases. Mike was a
founding director of the Association of Attorney
-Mediators, serving as President of AAM in
1991 and chair of its Seed Group Program. He
is a frequent speaker on mediation topics to
local and state bar associations. Mike is also
the most recent recipient of TAM’s Susanne
Adams Award for his work in defending and
promoting mediation in Texas. For more
information on TAMC, please contact Mike at
THE TEXAS MEDIATOR 7 www.txmediator.org
Courtside With Mike Amis
Vigilance Still Required: All Eyes are on Texas
By Mike Amis
TAM’s Nominating Committee has submitted the names of the mediators listed below as nominees for President-Elect, Secretary, Treasurer, and three
Director-at-Large positions for the TAM Board of Directors’ 2014 Annual Election. Those elected will take office at the Annual Meeting on February
21st in Austin, Texas. TAM thanks the nominees for their willingness to serve.
Voting will be conducted online until February 20, 2014. To access the ballot and vote online, go to the Members Only section of the TAM website
www.txmediator.org and log in. Scroll down the page to find the link to the 2014 Board of Directors Election.
Pattie Porter, San Antonio -- Nominee for President-Elect
Pattie Porter, MSW, AAP is a TMCA Credentialed Distinguished Mediator and has served as the Social Media Chair on the TAM
Board for the past two years. She has been a member of TAM since 2007 and is a co-chair of the 2015 TAM Conference. Pattie is
Founder and President of her own conflict management practice serving businesses and government agencies throughout the U.S.
For close to 20 years, she has provided workplace mediation, conflict coaching and team facilitation services. She is an adjunct
faculty member at Southern Methodist University’s Graduate Dispute Resolution Program and Advisory Board member for the
Association for Conflict Resolution’s Workplace Section. She is a featured host of the 5 year running radio program, The Texas
Conflict Coach® (www.texasconflictcoach.com).
David Ladensohn, San Antonio – Nominee for Secretary
David Ladensohn has been a member of TAM for seven years and joined the board in 2013. David specializes in mediating fami-
ly business and inter-generational wealth conflicts and serves on the boards of two fourth generation family businesses. He retired
as CEO of a third-generation manufacturing company in San Antonio after 21 years, before which he worked for Bank of America
for 12 years, including as VP-Manager of their Hong Kong Corporate Banking Office. David volunteers at the Bexar County
DRC and several other non-profits; he holds a B.S. in Finance from the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, an MBA in
International Business from Pepperdine University, and completed the mediation program of PON at Harvard Law School and the
Owner/President Manager program at Harvard Business School.
Meg Walker, Galveston – Nominee for Treasurer
Our hard-working TAM Treasurer since 2005, Meg Walker has been a mediator in private practice since 1994. Elected to the
TAM board in 2002, Meg served as Co-Chair of the 2004 Conference and also served as TAM Secretary in 2004. Meg is a grad-
uate of the University of Houston Law Center and Tulane University. In addition to TAM, Meg has served many non-profit
organizations as advisor, leader and/or member of the staff, including the Association for Conflict Resolution (ACR), the Texas
Chapter of the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC) and Texas Accountants and Lawyers for the Arts (TALA).
Currently, she is also the Treasurer of the Galveston County Bar Foundation and a Member of the Board of Trustees of Trinity
Episcopal School. She resides in Galveston with her son and husband.
Karey R. Barnes, McAllen -- Nominee for Director-at-Large, Term ending in 2015
Karey Barnes is the Director of Judicial Affiars and Conflict Resolution Services/Title IX Coordinator at South Texas College in
McAllen. Karey also facilitates the South Texas College Behavioral Intervention and Risk Assessment Team. He is an adjunct
faculty member in the Criminal Justice Department for the University of Phoenix. Prior to joining South Texas College Karey
served as the Intensive Supervision Officer for the Kleberg County Juvenile Probation Department. He is a Certified Trainer of
Workplace Conflict Resolution and is a Credentialed Mediator with TMCA. Karey holds a Bachelor’s degree from Texas A&M
University Kingsville and a Master’s degree in Public Safety from Capella University. He is pursuing a Doctorate in Public Safe-
ty from Capella University. He has been a member of TAM since 2011. Karey is being nominated to fill the vacancy in a three-
year term that was created when David Ladensohn was nominated to be TAM Secretary.
Jennifer Ortiz Prather, Houston -- Nominee for Director-at-Large, Term ending in 2017
Jennifer Ortiz Prather is a Supervisory Attorney and Program Manager for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commis-sion’s (EEOC) ADR program in the Houston District Office. She mediates private sector employment discrimination disputes and oversees the ADR/Mediation program for Houston and New Orleans. Under her leadership, the mediation program has conducted over 2,000 mediations, with an average settlement rate over 70% and achieved over $20 million dollars in mone-tary settlement benefits for charging parties. Prior to joining the EEOC in 2010, Jennifer served as a Commissioner with the U.S. Federal Mediation & Conciliation Service (FMCS) in the Office of International & Dispute Resolution Services. She served as a Federal Mediator for Labor and ADR cases, with an emphasis on EEO issues and workplace disputes. She has conducted hundreds of work shops, trainings and conflict intervention programs for domestic and international audiences. Jennifer is a
native Houstonian. She received her BA from the University of Southern California and her JD from Vermont Law School.
continued on page 9
NOMINEES FOR TAM’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR 2014
THE TEXAS MEDIATOR 8 www.txmediator.org
Proposed TAM Board of Directors and Officers for 2014
continued from page 8
Irene P. Zucker, Dallas -- Nominee for Director-at-Large, Term ending in 2017
Irene Zucker, Principle at VerbaCom® Executive Development, has been an executive consultant, course developer, and national
trainer specializing in Negotiation, conflict resolution and oral communication for 18+ years. She is also principle of IN Mediation
Services, Dallas, Texas and is a bilingual TMCA Credentialed Advanced Mediator practicing 16 years, in the public and private
sectors in areas of B2B, Civil, Workplace Issues, Family, and Foreclosures. She was nominated Dallas County Mediator of the Year,
and was recipient of Special U. S. Congressional Recognition for Outstanding Service to the Community in dispute resolution. Irene
has been a TAM member since 2009.
RETURNING MEMBERS TO TAM’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR 2014
Gene Roberts, Huntsville – President, Elected in 2013
In-coming TAM President Gene Roberts has been on the Board for four years and has been a member of TAM since 2007. Gene
Roberts is the Director of the Student Legal and Mediation Services at Sam Houston State University and is a Council Member for
the State Bar of Texas ADR Section. Gene is a 1998 graduate of the SMU School of Law and served as Chair of the Dallas Bar
Association’s ADR Section in 2012. He has also served the Dallas Chapter of the Association for Conflict Resolution as a mem-
ber of its Board of Directors, President-Elect, and President.
Melynda Gulley, San Antonio -- Immediate Past President
Melynda Gulley has been a TAM member since 2001 and has served on the TAM Board for five years, most recently as President.
Her mediation expertise focuses on the emotional, spiritual and interpersonal aspects of family relationships. Currently she and
two others have started a new business, Mediators & Counselor, Inc., an innovative approach for getting a divorce, focusing on
making Mediation the process which drives the divorce. Melynda has been practicing mediation for 14 years and has performed
over 285 mediations of all types. She is a TMCA Credentialed Distinguished Mediator.
Erich M. Birch, Austin -- Director-at-Large, Term ending in 2015
Erich Birch is a lawyer, mediator and arbitrator with the Austin law firm of Birch, Becker & Moorman. The firm assists with
environmental and construction law matters and provides ADR services. Prior to private law practice Erich was an attorney with
Texas’ environmental regulatory agency, and prior to practicing law he was an engineer in the chemical industry. Erich has a
B.E. in Mechanical Engineering from Vanderbilt University, and a Law degree from the University of Houston. He has been a
Board Member of the TAM for three years. Erich also serves on the ADR Council and the General Practice, Solo, and Small
Firm Section of the State Bar, is a panel member of the American Arbitration Association, and is a Professional Engineer in Tex-
as. Erich is co-chair of the 2014 TAM Conference. He has been a member of TAM since 2009.
Kathleen Dial, San Marcos -- Director-at-Large, Term ending in 2016
Kathleen Dial has been a member of TAM since 2006 and has been on the Board for one year. She is a co-chair for the 2015
TAM Conference. Kathleen retired from the US Postal Service as a Human Resources executive in 2006. She graduated from
West Texas State University in 1970, is a TMCA Distinguished Credentialed mediator, and serves as Vice President of the Central
Texas DRC (Formerly Hays County DRC). She also serves as an Ombudsman for the ESGR (Employer Support for the Guard
and Reserves). Kathy is a CASA volunteer and currently serves as the Secretary, Board of Directors for CASA of Central Texas.
She regularly mediates for the Central Texas DRC and the Bexar County DRC.
Lori Ann LaConta, Houston -- Director-at-Large, Term ending in 2016
Lori LaConta is an attorney, arbitrator, mediator, and adjunct professor of human resource management. Lori has mediated hun-
dreds of cases involving labor, employment, commercial, family law, real estate, and personal injury disputes. The Harris County
Dispute Resolution Center has recognized Lori as one of the Top Volunteer Mediators every year since 2007. She holds a J.D.
from Southern Methodist University, a B.S. in Communications from the University of Texas at Austin, and an M.B.A. with Hu-
man Resource Management concentration from the University of Houston Clear Lake. Lori has been on the TAM Board for one
year and has been a TAM member for three years.
Christina S. Schroer, Cedar Park -- Director-at-Large, Term ending in 2015
Christina Schroer is an Ombudsman for the Texas Employer Support for the Guard and the Reserves (ESGR). She is retired from
the U.S Air Force, serving in 15 countries. Christina has been a member of TCMA since 2005 and Austin Association of Media-
tors since 2008. She joined TAM in 2006 and has served on the TAM Board for two years. Christina received a BA in Sociology
and an MA in Conflict Resolution from St. Edward's University in Austin, TX.
continued on page 13
THE TEXAS MEDIATOR 9 www.txmediator.org
INTERNATIONAL PEACEMAKERS
A Path To Peace In Argentina: Equipo IMCA Blazes A Trail
By Walter A. Wright
I. Some Background and a Disclosure
The twentieth century was a turbulent time for
the people of Argentina. Intense political divi-
sions often caused extreme policy shifts as
governments seized control from each other --
sometimes through the ballot
box, other times through mili-
tary coups. From 1976 through
1983, the country endured an
internal war during which a
military regime attempted to end
violence with even greater vio-
lence. Thousands of people
“disappeared” during this peri-
od, meaning they were abduct-
ed, tortured and executed with-
out trial. Some of the
“disappeared” were revolutionaries who had
engaged in violence, but many were simply
opponents of the military regime or social activ-
ists. Numerous economic crises accompanied
the political upheavals of the twentieth century,
which added to social instability.
Argentina returned to democratic governance
after the military regime that presided over the
war initiated a disastrous war with the British in
1982 over the Falkland Islands (known in Ar-
gentina as the Malvinas Islands). In 1983, Raúl
Alfonsín became the first democratically elect-
ed president to succeed that military regime,
and six constitutionally elected presidents have
succeeded him. During this time, relative polit-
ical stability has endured despite continuing
economic challenges.
The difficult times of the twentieth century
created a longing among many Argentines for
peace and stability, and Argentina was one of
the first countries in Latin America to promote
mediation as a method for peacefully resolving
disputes. In 1995, the city of Buenos Aires,
Argentina’s Federal Capital, passed a mandato-
ry mediation law that applied to many civil,
commercial and family disputes. Since that law
went into effect in 1996, most Argentine prov-
inces
have
passed
voluntary
or man-
datory
mediation
laws,
ranking
the coun-
try
among
the world’s most advanced mediation propo-
nents.
One of the first—and most enduring—
promoters of mediation in Argentina is the
Equipo Interdisciplinario de Mediación, Concil-
iación y Arbitraje (Equipo IMCA), which
means the Interdisciplinary Team of Mediation
Conciliation and Arbitration. This nonprofit
organization, established in 1995, has become a
leader, not only in the field of mediation, but
also in the broader context of building peace in
Argentina.
Before you read further, I must disclose that I
became an honorary member of Equipo IMCA
in 1996, and I have become increasingly active
in the organization’s activities over the years. I
am now a co-director of El Acuerdo, the news-
letter described below, and the organization’s
founders are among my best friends in Latin
America. Although I cannot claim any objec-
tivity when writing about this organization, I
hope you will find it worthy of your attention.
II. Spreading Mediation Skills and
Knowledge
When Equipo IMCA began its work shortly
after the first mediation law passed in Buenos
Aires, its primary goal was to promote media-
tion, and it did so by offering comprehensive
mediation training. In Buenos Aires, mediation
is more strictly regulated than in Texas. Media-
tors must be lawyers with a minimum of three
years of experience, and they must be registered
as mediators with the Ministry of Justice and
Human Rights (MJHR). With the consent of all
parties, members of other professions (e.g.,
social workers, psychologists) may act as medi-
ators’ assistants. All mediators and mediators’
assistants must take basic training approved by
the MJHR. The basic training consists of twen-
ty hours of conflict and mediation theory, sixty
hours of practical training, and twenty hours of
apprenticeship. Since 1996, Equipo IMCA has
conducted dozens of mediation courses in Bue-
nos Aires and many of the Argentine provinces;
it is now a recognized leader in mediation train-
ing.
Equipo IMCA’s members are prolific authors
of books and articles about mediation. In 1996,
Mario de Almeida and Alba de Almeida, re-
spectively the organization’s president and
academic secretary, wrote a book entitled La
experiencia de la mediación: exegesis de la ley
24.573 (translation: The mediation experience:
exegesis of law 24,573), about the first Buenos
Aires mediation law. They wrote a second
book about the same law and its implementing
regulations in 2001. After Buenos Aires issued
a new mediation law in 2010, the Almeidas
wrote a third book in 2012, Mediación y Con-
ciliación (translation: Mediation and Concilia-
tion), which explained the new law and its im-
plementing regulations and compared it to the
laws of the various Argentine provinces.
Through these books and numerous book chap-
ters and articles the Almeidas and other mem-
bers of Equipo IMCA have written, the organi-
continued on page 11
THE TEXAS MEDIATOR 10 www.txmediator.org
International Peacemakers
A Path To Peace In Argentina:
Equipo IMCA Blazes A Trail
continued from page 10
-zation has become a respected authority on
mediation theory and practice in Argentina.
El Acuerdo, a newsletter that Equipo IMCA
publishes, is another of Equipo IMCA’s
remarkable accomplishments. The organiza-
tion has always considered it important to
update the legal and mediation communities
about the development of mediation in Ar-
gentina and elsewhere. To that end, Equipo
IMCA published the first issue of El Acuerdo
in 1996, and it completed its ninety-first issue
in 2013. Each issue of the newsletter con-
tains important updates on Argentine legal
developments affecting mediation, along
with practical information and advice for
mediators. In recent years, the newsletter has
also taken on a more international focus. It
now publishes articles in four languages
(English, Spanish, Portuguese and French), and
each issue usually contains at least one article
from a non-Argentine author.
III. Building Peace
Equipo IMCA has always had an expansive
view of mediation’s potential. While its mem-
bers understand the various laws establishing
mediation as an adjunct to the court system
have been an important means of introducing
mediation to the country, they hope to use me-
diation practices for the broader purpose of
building peace within Argentine society. For
this broader purpose, they believe mediation
skills cannot be the exclusive province of law-
yers; society as a whole must learn and practice
the skills. Equipo IMCA also realizes that
members of other professions have made inval-
uable contributions to mediation; as a result, the
word “interdisciplinary” has always been a part
of its name, and it has taken an interdisciplinary
approach to its work from the outset.
The organization’s members have taken several
important steps toward the broader goal of
building peace. One of the most important
steps, on a theoretical level, was Alba de Al-
meida’s 2010 book, La Paz: camino para el
cambio social (translation: Peace: the path to
social change), in which she advocated the
employment of mediators’ skills (e.g., the abil-
ity to listen, the ability to
think critically, the ability
to prevent, manage, and
resolve conflicts) as an
essential part of peace
building. On a practical
level, Alicia Garayo, a
founder of Equipo IMCA
who lives in the province
of Neuquén, has been
supporting the youth of
Zapala, a small town in
Neuquén, in their struggle
to preserve an aquifer
from excessive commer-
cial exploitation. Cristina
Camelino, a member of
Equipo IMCA from La
Plata in the Province of
Buenos Aires, has done
extensive work to analyze and critique the ten-
dency of certain members of the press to in-
flame conflict, and she is developing a new
project to promote mutual understanding in
Argentina’s increasingly diverse society. Equi-
po IMCA has also started a Red de Construc-
tores de la Paz (translation: Peace Builders’
Network) on its Facebook page. Through all of
these activities, Equipo IMCA hopes to avoid a
return to the violence of the past and weave
peaceful approaches to conflict resolution
into the fabric of Argentine culture.
IV. Partnering with the Association for
Conflict Resolution
Equipo IMCA has always had an interna-
tional outlook, and it has expanded its inter-
national outreach by creating a special
relationship with the Association for Con-
flict Resolution (ACR) in the United States.
Members of Equipo IMCA—especially
Mario and Alba de Almeida, Alicia Garayo
and Cristina Camelino—have regularly
attended ACR’s national conferences
throughout the United States, and they have
presented their work and ideas on several
occasions as part of the Bilingual Track and
on International Day. Alicia Garayo cur-
rently serves as a director-at-large of ACR’s
International Section, and Alba de Almeida has
also served in that capacity. Equipo IMCA
deepened its relationship with ACR in 2010,
when it entered into a formal cooperation agree-
ment with ACR. Since that time, it has co-
organized two international conferences with
ACR (in 2011 and 2013) at the urban campus of
the Universidad de Ciencias Empresariales y
Sociales (translation: University of Business
and Social Sciences), a private university in
Buenos Aires. Currently, Equipo IMCA is co-
organizing a third conference with ACR in
Argentina. That conference will take place on
May 22-23, 2014 at the urban campus of the
Universidad Nacional del Litoral (translation:
National University of the Litoral) in Santa Fe,
the capital of the province of the same name.
Anyone interested in attending this conference
can contact me at [email protected].
In summary, Equipo IMCA exemplifies the
determined efforts of many Argentines to incor-
porate mediation into the legal system and to
employ mediation skills while building a per-
manent foundation for peace in Argentina and
elsewhere. For further information about Equi-
po IMCA, visit its website at http://www.equipo
-imca.com.ar/ or become one of its friends on
Facebook.
Walter A. Wright is an Asso-
ciate Professor in the Legal
Studies Program of the De-
partment of Political Science
at Texas State University in
San Marcos. He is a former
President of TAM.
Alicia Garayo, Alba de Almeida and Mario de Almeida at the
2010 ACR Conference in Chicago.
THE TEXAS MEDIATOR 11 www.txmediator.org
Cristina Camelino teaching a workshop at the 2013 ACR
Conference in Buenos Aires.
Change My Mind —If You Can!
By Kay Elkins Elliot
Most, if not all, of you, dear readers, are media-
tors. Many of you have not only taken multiple
courses in how to manage the mediation pro-
cess, you also have studied and practiced the
arts of persuasive communication. I said “arts”
deliberately. A growing body of literature from
multiple disciplines is available for study and is
supported by validated, reliable scientific re-
search. The fascination with cognitive science
has added to this body of knowledge, and con-
tinues to amaze and enlighten anyone with a
curious and open mind. In the past fifteen
years, the discoveries about brain systems,
connections, anatomical structures, memory,
and functioning has grown exponentially. One
doesn’t have to be a mediator to be fascinated
with the amazing capabilities of our brains! But
mediators have a particularly strong motivation
to know more about this area of study: we are
in the business of persuasion. We are expert
influencers.
Persuasion is everywhere and plays an im-
portant role in politics, psychotherapy, law,
education, religion and everyday social interac-
tions. We all try to influence others and are
influenced by others continuously. A lifetime
of these activities gives us a base-line for what
we believe is effective – just based on our own,
trial-and-error experiences over a lifetime. Is
this the best way to become more persuasive?
Rather than relying on intuitive personal assess-
ment or the advice from popular books on the
subject, mediators can benefit from the work of
scholars in diverse disciplines (from communi-
cations, psychology, political science, law,
marketing, and advertising who have studied
persuasion systematically for years). Would
you like to know more?
There are some well-known tools of influence,
backed up by science. Let’s look at two of
them: reciprocity and authority. Humans are
wired to respond, either negatively or positive-
ly, to the behaviors of others. For example, if
you are the recipient of a favor, you will proba-
bly say “much obliged” and feel an urge to do
something beneficial for your benefactor. In
negotiation or mediation, the granting of a con-
cession, such as decreasing a dollar demand in
the settlement of a lawsuit, is usually influential
on the other side. Making a first concession is
therefore usually a smart strategy in bargaining,
particularly if the concession is not perceived as
very valuable to the giver but is highly valued
by the other side. A concession plan might
include a sincere apology for past behavior,
which costs nothing, and can motivate the
“victim” to reciprocate: either with a return
apology or even with a dollar concession. In an
employment dispute, the defendant corporation
might offer to transfer an aggrieved employee
to a different department, setting up the urge for
a reciprocal move by the employee, such as
dropping a complaint or dismissing a law suit.
Some parties build into their package of possi-
ble concession items that are not as highly val-
ued as other items. Those low -valued items are
offered early, accompanied by a request for a
reciprocal concession that has much higher
value. Giving a small dollar concession accom-
panied by a rationale (“as a show of good faith,
we want to start by conceding this amount right
away because we think that is fair and appropri-
ate in this case”) might set just the right tone.
There are numerous strong forces at play in
distributive bargaining. One of the most power-
ful is the natural desire of sellers to maximize,
and buyers to minimize, the price point. Known
as the “zero-sum assumption,” this logic sounds
more like a football game than a negotiation but
is present in most bargains: every dollar (yard)
the seller (player) gains is a dollar the buyer
loses. In most negotiations or mediations there
is an accompanying assumption of scarce re-
sources, which may or may not be accurate.
The psychology of influence teaches us, how-
ever, that the reciprocity norm opposes and
trumps the zero sum assumption. Once the first
concession (even if it is just an apology or ex-
pression of empathy) is made by either party,
this powerful social norm is triggered and virtu-
ally compels the other party to reciprocate with
a concession that is sometimes of greater value.
In the tension of opposing psychological forces,
reciprocation will usually govern. Negotiators
continue to participate knowingly in this power-
ful “dance” network of obligations because it
has helped our species to survive, individually
and collectively, since the dawn of humanity.
Regarding bargaining, consider the following
points about “winning” when lawyers negoti-
ate:
*Facts and law determine outcomes, and work
ethic and decency determine professional repu-
tation and standing.
*Lawyers who excessively value winning cre-
ate problems for themselves, other lawyers,
judges, and often their own client because they
become abrasive, obnoxious, and unable to
resolve cases in an advantageous way.
*The lawyer’s role requires competent legal
analysis and argument, but these activities oc-
cupy together perhaps five to fifteen percent of
the time and attention of most lawyers.
*Core facts, circumstances, and other factors
such as available resources, personalities of
clients, lawyers, judge, and jury represent the
non-legal considerations that, more than the
purely legal aspects, determine outcomes in
settlement and trial.
Another, often undervalued or unexamined,
influencer is Authority. To explain this weapon
of influence, suppose that you agree to partici-
pate in an experiment: you will help a research-
er study how punishment affects learning and
memory. Your role will be to push a button that
delivers an electric shock to another participant
when that person, the “learner,” does not re-
member the correct word in a list of paired
words you will give him to study. Each succes-
sive “shock” will be of greater intensity. How
would you feel? Nervous? The shocks you
administer for each incorrect response intensify
from 195, to 210, to 225 and up to 450 volts.
You are told by the researcher that you must
continue the experiment, even though the
“learner” is has begun to scream in pain and
beg for you to stop! Lest you think I have a
sadistic imagination, this experiment actually
occurred at Yale, designed, administered, and
evaluated by a psychology Professor: Dr. Stan-
ley Milgram. Prior to the experiment, estimates
(from colleagues and graduate psychology
students) of what percentage of volunteers
would be willing to administer intense electrical
shocks to a sobbing, pain-wracked, learner were
very low – about 1- 2 percent. In fact, about
two thirds of the volunteers continued the ex-
periment when told by the researcher to com-
plete the task they had been assigned and for
which they were being paid. The explanation is
that the “learner” was in fact an actor and was
only pretending to be in pain. The research
question was this: when it is their job, how
much suffering will ordinary people be willing
to inflict on an entirely innocent other person?
The answer surprised everyone, even the re-
searcher! Even when the “learner” announced
before the experiment that he had a heart condi-
tion, the results were the same: 65 percent of
the subjects carried out their duties faithfully
continued on page 13
THE TEXAS MEDIATOR 12 www.txmediator.org
President’s Message
continued from front page
and Erich Birch. The conference updates during the
TAM board meetings this year allude to a unique and
educational experience. As it was in past years, we
will have exceptional breakout topics and keynote
speakers to offer our members. Please make every
effort to attend the conference and to help Gene
Roberts kick off his year as TAM president with a
bang.
Thank you for the honor of serving as your president,
Melynda Gully is the current President of the Texas
Association of Mediators. Her term will end during
the TAM Membership Meeting on Saturday, Febru-
ary 22, 2014 when TAM's President for the 2014-
2015 year, Gene Roberts, will be installed. Melynda
will then begin her one year term as TAM's Immedi-
ate Past President. Melynda's mediation expertise
focuses on the emotional, spiritual and interpersonal
aspects of family relationships. Melynda has been
practicing mediation for 14 years and has performed
over 285 mediations of all types. She is a TMCA
Credentialed Distinguished Mediator
Change my Mind —If You Can!
continued from page 12
through the maximum shock, listening to the
pleadings, screaming and finally the ominous
silence, of the actor. Milgram published his
findings with this explanation: there is a deep-
seated sense of duty to authority within us all
and the “real culprit in the experiments was the
subject’s inability to defy the wishes of the boss
of the study – the lab-coated researcher who
urged and, if need be, directed the subjects to
perform their duties, despite the emotional and
physical mayhem they were causing.”
What is the mediator take-away from this grisly
finding? A widely accepted system of authority
confers a huge advantage on any society. The
legal/judicial system in America, a major part
of the authority structure in our culture, in-
cludes court annexed mediation. The mediator,
therefore, is assumed to have authority, and in
fact is listed with judges and arbitrators in the
definition of tribunal (to whom lawyers and
parties may not lie) included at the beginning of
the Texas ADR act. How best to use that au-
thority as an influencer for settlement? Without
telling parties what to do (settle for $50,000),
some mediators tell relevant and emotional
stories of other cases, where settlement was
achieved, as a motivator to think more positive-
ly about continuing to negotiate. Mediators
sometimes become more directive in terms of
focused litigation risk analysis – pointing out
the weaknesses of each party’s law suit or the
inherent risks of all trials. In non-court annexed
cases, such as employment disputes within an
organization, where the mediator may have the
authority of being the ombudsman for that
organization, or in family matters mediated by a
family court services employee, the mediator
can leverage the authority role to motivate a
more open mind and engagement in generating
options and finding solutions. Just being able
to establish and enforce ground rules for media-
tion can prevent a party from leaving the pro-
cess without having a dialogue with the media-
tor, or from becoming insulting or even violent.
Having the parties tell their stories to you, an
authority figure, who can validate their percep-
tion, may soften rigidity, and bring the conflict
story more into line with a blended, compro-
mise version of the case. You are enacting the
role of a powerful influencer.
Putting together just these two influencers,
reciprocity and authority,(and there are many
more) is helpful in preparing and managing the
mediation process. Stay tuned because in future
columns, there will be more about the im-
portance of influencers and your role as one of
them!
i Persuasion: From Single to Multiple to Meta-
cognitive Processes, 2008 Association for Psy-
chological Science, 137-147.
ii K. Elliott & F. Elliott, Settlement Advocacy,
11 Texas Wesleyan Law Review, 7 (2004).
iii Krieger, Human Nature as a New Guiding
Philosophy for Legal Education and the Profes-
sion, 47 Washburn Law Journal 101, 135
(2008).
iv Cialdini, Influence: How and Why People
Agree to Things, 208 (1984).
Kay Elkins Elliott, J.D.,
LL.M., M.A., maintains a
private practice, Elliott
Mediations, and serves as
ADR coordinator, coach,
and adjunct professor at
Texas A&M University
School of Law in Fort
Worth. She is also the ADR coordinator of the
Texas Wesleyan University Mediation Certifi-
cate program and writes columns for the Texas
Association of Mediators Newsletter and the
State Bar of Texas ADR Section newsletter. She
is a former board member of the Texas media-
tor Credentialing Association and is a TMCA
Distinguished Credentialed Mediator. She
formerly served on the SBOT ADR council, is
the co-editor and chapters author of the Texas
ADR Handbook, 3rd edition, and is co-editing
and writing chapters for the next edition to be
published in 2014, with her husband, Dean
Emeritus Frank Elliott. She has taught media-
tion in Europe and China. Her ADR law stu-
dent teams have won multiple regional, nation-
al, and international prizes in Negotiation,
Client Counseling, Mediation and Arbitration.
She is currently pursuing a graduate degree in
Marriage and Family Therapy.
THE TEXAS MEDIATOR 13 www.txmediator.org
Proposed TAM Board of Directors
and Officers for 2014
continued from page 9
In addition to those persons listed above,
TAM’s Board also consists of five directors
who are appointed each year to serve the
Board for a one-year term beginning with the
board meeting held in conjunction with the
annual conference. These appointed directors
serve TAM in the positions of Historian,
Membership Chair, Newsletter Editor, Social
Media Chair, and TMCA Representative.
We will highlight the appointed directors and
TAM’s out-going officers and directors in
our next issue of The Texas Mediator.
Yes, we have entered the Twittersphere...a
social network called Twitter and all of its mil-
lions of global registered users. TAM first put
its big toe into the social network ocean two
years ago by engaging members in our Linked
In group; and then a year later we started our
own Facebook page. In this New Year, our
social media strategy is to join and engage in
the conversation. What conversation you ask?
Good question.
Let’s start by educating you about Twitter, Inc.
a social networking company founded in 2006.
It is a social networking and micro-messaging
platform where anyone can register, send and
receive “tweets” which are 140 character text
messages. It is an opportunity to discover and
share information with real-time communica-
tion FAST! The conversation is about engaging
with anyone in the world on topics of interest to
you. Strategically, it makes sense to focus on
building a collegial network of individuals and
businesses interested in your area of practice
such as conflict resolution, mediation or conflict
coaching, etc. Within your network, you can
ask questions, discover resources, get connected
to others, share your knowledge and build trust-
ing relationships. The conversations often lead
to others sharing your insights and knowledge
to their networks -- often reaching thousands of
people and building referral networks. At first it
can be daunting and time consuming, but one
learns how to best manage their time and learns
to be strategic in how best to leverage their
social networks.
Getting started on Twitter means signing up for
a free account at www.twitter.com and creating
your Twitter handle. TAM’s new Twitter han-
dle is @TXAssocMediator. Because the tweets
are short…no more than 140 characters…you
need to learn how to use abbreviated words to
communicate your thoughts, feelings, resources
or tips. For example, TBH means “to be hon-
est” or “ICYMI” translates to “in case you
missed it” or “TY” for “thank you”.
4 Basic Commands you need to know in order
to send your first tweet.
Use the @ symbol paired with a Twitter
handle (someone’s Twitter name). It is
essential when you want to address some-
one specific or when you want to share
with others.
° Example - Really loved this post by
@DonPhilbin. Gr8 tips.
° Example - @EngageConflict Who has
been ur favorite guest on the Conflict
Specialists show?
Use the # symbol or hashtag as it is neces-
sary to create themes, find trending topics,
search important threads or ask questions
to engage your audience.
° Example - Ck out the upcoming
@TXAssocMediator conference in Austin
#TAM2014
° Example – How might conflict coaching
be used in mediation? #mediation
#coaching
Use RT to retweet or share a micro-
message written by someone else. This
message is something you feel is worth
sharing with others in your network.
° Example – RT @TXAssocMediator: We
are excited to have @NewYorkPeace Brad
Heckman at our upcoming conference in
Austin. #TAM2014
Use DM or a direct message to contact some-
one privately in your Twitter network. This
private message is only seen by the person you
direct the message to and will not be posted in
the Twitter timeline.
° Example – DM @SMUDRCM Is there a
healthcare mediation class as part of ur
program?
If you are a new user, I highly suggest visiting
Twitter’s Help Center and reading their New
User FAQs (https://support.twitter.com/
articles/13920-new-user-faqs#) or check out
Twitter 101: What is Twitter Really About?
(http://socialmediatoday.com/daniel-
zeevi/1371811/twitter-101-what-twitter-really-
about)
Pattie Porter, LCSW, AAP is a
TMCA Credentialed Distin-
guished Mediator and has
served as the Social Media
Chair on the TAM Board for
the past two years. She has
been a member of TAM since 2007 and is a co-
chair of the 2015 TAM Conference. Pattie is
TAM’s nominee for President-Elect in 2014.
Entering The Twittersphere
By Pattie Porter
THE TEXAS MEDIATOR 14 www.txmediator.org
Don’t Forget to Renew Your TAM
Membership for 2014
Full Member - $75 Candidate for Membership - $50 Friend - $50
The TAM membership year is based on the calendar year. Therefore, all 2013 memberships expired on Dec. 31, 2013. (If
you joined after Oct. 1, 2013, you have already renewed for 2014.) Membership renewal reminders were sent by email to
all 2013 members. Your email address is also your login for the member center. If you have questions about membership
please email [email protected].
The Mediator’s Toolbox
To Avoid Breakdown, Break it Down!
By David A. Ladensohn
THE TEXAS MEDIATOR 15 www.txmediator.org
We know that as mediators we must use all our
senses. We must truly listen to what the clients
and their attorneys say, read their body
language, be hyper-aware of everything --
trying not to miss the little nuances that occur
during a mediation that tell us so much about
what is really going on.
But one of the most important ways to listen
that we must not forget is to listen with our
hearts. We must always remember that we are
not just dealing with titles and roles (attorneys,
parties, plaintiffs, defendants), but with people.
And all people have goals and dreams – some
of which are impossible by any logical
reasoning, but which are always there,
nonetheless.
I recently did a Child Protective Services
mediation for which the ultimate outcome was a
foregone conclusion. The parents had both
made a number of bad choices in their lives,
and CPS held all the cards. The children were
currently in foster placement with a perfect
young couple who wanted to adopt them.
There was little doubt that if the case went to
trial the biological parents would lose their
parental rights, and the foster parents would
adopt the children. It was just a question of
when, where, and how this would happen.
This feeling of foregone conclusion and just-
going-through-the-motions was the predomi-
nant mood in the mediation room as I entered it.
The sheer number of people there who felt the
interests of the children would best be served by
severing the biological parents’ rights was
staggering. They couldn’t even all fit on one
side of a very long table, but wrapped around
the end and up the other side. It was readily
apparent that the majority of the people present
expected my role to be one of helping them
convince the parents that they should give in to
the inevitable with as little fuss as possible so
everyone on their side of the table could get on
with their busy lives.
In sharp contrast, the other side of this dispute
was very small in number. Only one parent –
the incarcerated one – showed up for the
mediation. The other one could not be found,
although that parent’s attorney and several other
people tried valiantly to find the absent party.
The parent who was present was sitting near
one end of the conference table with his/her
court-appointed attorney and with the guard
stationed a few feet away. The parent’s
appearance was enough to keep everyone else
at a safe distance – inmate garb; chains; long,
un-kempt hair. I had to tell myself this prisoner
was a parent who was facing losing his/her
children forever, and that if anyone in my entire
mediation career needed help in leveling out a
power imbalance, it was he/she. I willed myself
to go over to the head of the table, introduce
myself, shake hands, and sit down.
We began the mediation according to the script
CPS expected us to follow until the parent’s
attorney, who also looked beyond his client’s
outer appearance to the person within, asked for
a break. The attorney could see that if things
continued as they were, his client would react
defensively – perhaps violently – and needed a
break. The parent was frightened, grossly
outnumbered, cornered, and on the edge of a
“knee-jerk” reaction that would definitely not
help his/her case. The attorney spoke with his
client alone for a few minutes and then talked
privately with me.
The three of us – the attorney, parent, and I –
then talked for some time about the parent’s
own unhappy life experiences as a foster child
who was ultimately returned to his/her abusive
and hated parent by CPS. We talked about the
parent’s desire to make a better life for him/
herself and the children. The parent pleaded
that he/she only needed some time to make all
that happen. We then talked about the reality
that the children didn’t have the time to wait.
They needed that good life now.
Against the advice of the powers that controlled
the other side, I brought everyone back to the
table at that point, seating the prospective
adoptive parents directly opposite from the
biological parent. The only advice I gave the
prospective parents before they entered the
room was to refrain from discussing things that
had happened in the past between the children
and their biological parents, particularly
negative things, and to focus on the present
situation and their hopes for the future of the
children.
And then a magical thing happened. The
biological parent and the prospective adoptive
parents talked about their mutual love for the
children, the cute things the children did, the
games they enjoyed, their new school and
friends… All the other people at the table faded
away. It was no longer two sides to a dispute; it
was just three parents talking about their kids.
At the end all three were crying; yet, all three
were satisfied.
We all want to think of ourselves as noble, no
matter how bad we look in the eyes of the
world. We want to be able to look at ourselves
and smile. We want to know that we’ve done
something right and that it really matters that
we did it. We want a better life for ourselves
and for our children. No matter how many
mistakes we’ve made and how impossible the
future looks, we want to believe there’s hope.
In the eyes of the law this mediation turned out
the way “everyone” expected, but it was so
much more. A parent who had made many
mistakes in the past willingly – almost eagerly –
gave up one of the last rights he/she still had,
knowing it was the right thing to do. The new
parents who were rescuing their children from
an uncertain and sometimes frightening
experience knew they were doing it with the
blessing and the sacrifice of the biological
parent. When the children asked later about this
parent, they would be able to say in all honesty
that when it really mattered for their future,
their parent had willingly and lovingly done the
noble thing.
Linda Gibson is an
attorney mediator in
Temple, Texas. She has
been a member of TAM for
twenty years and has been
a board member for fifteen
of those years, serving as
TAM President in 2004.
Linda currently serves as TAM’s newsletter
editor.
The Mediator’s Toolbox
Listen with Your Heart
By Linda Gibson
Full Members
Jeffry Abrams, Houston
DeLila S. Bergan, Highland Village
W. Bradshaw Boney, Galveston
Carla Boykin, Irving
Bernie Casey, Cedar Park
River Dunavin, Houston
Jennifer Failla, Coral Gables, FL
Vicki Isaacks, Denton
Marcia Y. Anavitarte-Jordan, Austin
Don R. Kelly, Watauga
Joseph F. Rizzo, San Antonio
Mike G. Wallace, Austin
Friends of TAM
Sarah Litton Burkett, Houston
David H Green, Conroe
Bonnie L. Van Sickle, Ingleside
Elizabeth (Lisa) Woods, Austin
Candidates for Membership
Mary Ayala, Houston
Deitri Bastas Brixey, Prosper
Richard J. Cho, Irving
Iman Farrior, Houston
Jacquelyn A. Flynt, Fort Worth
Willie E Harris, Houston
Erika C. Hurst, Pearland
Brian Kennedy, El Paso
Brenda Chamblee Meek, Houston
Mireya Moreno, Bryan
Nancy B. Pike, McKinney
Carol Saliba, Houston
Troy Sonnenberg, Austin
Rebecca Vela, McAllen
Joyce Jack, Wimberley
Carlecia D. Wright, Houston
List as of February 6, 2014
Welcome New TAM Members
Dr. Ralph Steele has been a mediator since
1992 and a member of TAM since 2009. He
has conducted over 8000 hours of mediation,
and has more than ten years experience in the
mediation of business and family issues. Dr.
Steele has received two doctorate degrees -- one
in Civil Law and Mediation and a Ph.D. in
Psychology from Oxford University in the
United Kingdom. He is both a TMCA Creden-
tialed Distinguished Mediator and a Board
Certified Professional Counselor (by the Ameri-
can Psychotherapy Association and the Texas
Board of Examiners of Professional Counse-
lors). His undergraduate degree is from Con-
cordia University, and he holds a Master of
Divinity degree from Vanderbilt University.
Dr. Steele honorably served as a United States
naval officer and is devoted to developing our
youth as future leaders who have positive im-
pacts on society.
In addition to being a mediator and a counselor,
Dr. Steele also teaches mediation skills to oth-
ers. In 1992 he conducted peer mediation and
peer mediation training and wrote a book enti-
tled the School Conflict Resolution Mediation
Program. He also developed the Mediation
Certificate Program at the University of Texas
at Arlington and is on the faculty of that pro-
gram. His Irving-based business, Mediation
Worlds, PLLC, not only provides mediation
services, but also offers basic and advanced
mediation training and a Mediation Fellows
Program for current mediators. This fellowship
gives mediators opportunities to increase their
knowledge and skills to the highest competency
level. It is the intent of the fellowship program
to assist mediators in being able to mediate in
any setting. Dr. Steele has recently written two
books on the mediation profession, entitled
Save Millions with Conflict Coaching: A Cross
-Cultural Conflict Coaching Methodology and
Model (February, 2011) and Facts, Issues, Op-
tions, and Solutions (May, 2013).
Dr. Steele has a contractual partnership with the
World Mediation Organization as an Affiliate
and a District Manager and Lecturer of Media-
tion and Conflict Resolution. He is a frequent
mediation speaker, panelist, and judge.
Spotlight on TAM Member
Dr. Ralph Steele
THE TEXAS MEDIATOR 16 www.txmediator.org
Dr. Ralph Steele
Dealing with Difficult Personalities
THE TEXAS MEDIATOR 17 www.txmediator.org
The Tank by Stevie Hall
October is Conflict Resolution Month. Con-
flict can occur in the workplace, the educa-
tional setting, within the family, around the
world, and so on. So, here at Student Legal &
Mediation Services we want to make sure you
are prepared to handle difficult personalities
in these stressful situations.
In many environments we are in, we encoun-
ter difficult people. Though there are four
main types of difficult individuals, today we
will discuss “The Tank.” An individual who
possesses the qualities of a Tank will express
open aggressiveness, push their schedule
forward, and try to prove themselves while
demanding respect from the person they are
speaking with.
There’s nothing wrong with having this per-
sonality type; each of us have an aspect of
every personality type. However, when this
personality type becomes too overwhelming,
you need to use the proper steps to control the
situation. Dr. L. Darryl Armstrong, senior
facilitator of Behavioral Public Relations LLC
says to follow these tips:
1. Stay calm. If you raise your voice or
show that you are upset, it will only en-
courage the Tank’s aggression to escalate.
2. Use their name when speaking to them.
This makes them feel important.
3. Summarize and repeat everything they
said back to them, “[Name], so what I’m
hearing you say is that …”
4. Focus on the issue at hand, not their per-
sonality.
5. Keep in mind the perspective they are
coming from.
6. Don’t be afraid to ask for help or to pass it
on to a supervisor.
Dealing with a difficult personality can be
overwhelming, but practicing these steps
during confrontation can ensure an easier time
with a quicker route to a resolution.
Stevie Hall is a psychology major at Sam Houston
State University who will graduate in August 2014.
After graduation Stevie will continue her education
at graduate school to earn a Master’s of Counsel-
ing. She enjoys researching and learning about the
law, and hopes to be involved in the field someday.
The Know-It-All by Regan Joswiak
There are two types of Know-It-Alls: the true
expert on a subject and someone who pre-
tends to be an expert on a subject. The true
expert, while knowledgeable, may act conde-
scending and superior toward others. In their
opinion, you are not worth listening to unless
you have done your research and present
yourself as an equal on the subject. The pre-
tend expert acts the same way, but, of course,
lacks knowledge; because of this, they can be
easier to deal with in that they are unaware of
how little they know.
Dr. Clay Tucker-Ladd suggests strategies for
dealing with either type of Know-It-All:
1. Listen to them and then paraphrase their
ideas.
2. Do not attack their points; instead, ask
questions in such a way that suggests
alternative approaches (“It probably isn’t
a viable choice, but could we consider . .
.?”)
3. Make sure to show that you respect their
ideas, or at least seem as though you do.
The Know-It-All seeks respect and admi-
ration.
4. If the Know-It-All is a true expert who
will not consider anyone else’s ideas, you
may have to “graciously accept a subordi-
nate role as his/her ‘helper,’” as Tucker-
Ladd suggests.
5. In the case that The Know-It-All is a pre-
tend expert, they can be told the facts in a
tactful manner in private. Do not confront
them in front of a group, and keep in mind
that they simply want admiration from
those around them.
Regan Joswiak is a recent graduate of Sam
Houston State University with a B. A. in Eng-
lish. She serves as a Staff Associate I for Stu-
dent Legal & Mediation Services at Sam
Houston State University and is also an Office
Assistant for Aramark.
The Maybe Person by Mathew Baughman
The Maybe Person is simple to identify. They
are passive and tend to be people pleasers.
The Maybe Person will procrastinate on a
decision in hopes of finding a better option.
Often, this causes the decision to be made for
them.
Sources of Insight
(http://sourcesofinsight.com) outlines a few
ways that you can deal with a Maybe Person:
1. Establish a comfort zone
2. Clarify options
3. Use a decision making system
4. Show them that there are no perfect deci-
sions, and that their decision is a good one
5. Strengthen the relationship
The Exploder Person by Mathew Baughman
The Exploder is the type of person to shift
drastically in their mood swings. They may
seem calm and then trail off on a wild rant
that seems to be out of nowhere. They will
often use vulgar language and insulting terms
in order to make their opposition (you) feel
inadequate.
Dana Kelly provides some tools for handling
the Exploder personality:
1. Let them voice their concerns and then try
to solve the problem(s).
2. Attempt to calm them down.
3. Listen to what they have to say and take
them seriously.
4. Find a private area where they can express
their concerns with you, so they do not
cause a scene.
Mathew Baughman is a freshman at Sam
Houston State University and is currently
majoring in Political Science. Mathew hopes
to spend a semester abroad to further his
knowledge of international politics. After
graduation, Mathew would like to pursue a
career as a political analyst or a policy ana-
lyst.
Sam Houston State University’s Student Legal and Mediation Services provides 20,000 university students in Huntsville and The Wood-
lands with high-quality legal and conflict-resolution services. Gene Roberts, the Director of SLMS and the President of TAM, oversees a
staff of students who are dedicated to serving their fellow students. The office publishes a blog at www.bearkatlaw.com, where the student
workers, under Gene’s supervision, write articles relating to developments in law and conflict resolution that are of interest to students. As
a service to TAM and with the authors’ permission, we are sharing some of the blogs first published October 17 – 31, 2013 with you.
Calendar of Events
The Texas Association of Mediators offers this calendar of upcoming trainings and events as a service to its members and the
community. TAM does not recommend or endorse any specific provider, model or training. The information listed below has
been submitted to TAM by the providers. TAM does not verify credentials or any of the claims stated in the information. Addi-
tional details about each event can be found on the TAM website calendar. Please contact the provider for further information
or to register.
NOTE: Training courses and other events that would be of interest to TAM members can be submitted on the TAM website
Calendar of Events page: www.txmediator.org/training
Conflict resolution trainings and events in Texas can also be posted to the Texas Association of Mediators (TAM) Linked In
subgroup called “Conflict Resolution Events / Resources in Texas.” Join the subgroup and post.
You can join the subgroup by simply typing in the subgroup name while in Linked In using the search engine box in the top right-
hand corner. Make sure to use the drop down box to select "groups," type the subgroup name and hit enter. The subgroup will pop
up and select it.
AUSTIN
TAM 2014 Annual Conference: Mediators - Problem Solvers – Peacemakers - February 21 – 22,
2014 - Hyatt Regency Hotel
DALLAS/FORT WORTH AREA
Duncum Center for Conflict Resolution, Abilene Christian College at City Square, 325-674-2015, www.mediate.com/ccr/
pg1226.cfm
40-Hour Basic Mediation Training - March 17-21, 2014
continued on page 19
Save the date! TMCA’s 10th Annual
Symposium (yes, it’s been 10 years!) is
scheduled Saturday, October 5th, in Aus-
tin.
If you haven’t renewed your TMCA
credential or haven’t yet become creden-
tialed, please be sure to renew/apply as
soon as possible so you won’t miss the
opportunity to appear in our two-page ad
spread in the June 2014 Texas Bar Jour-
nal. A recent study indicated that 96%
of the attorneys who receive this publi-
cation read it. With a circulation ex-
ceeding 100,000 copies, this is an excel-
lent way to get your name and TMCA
credential in front of Texas attor-
neys. You can renew or apply for a cre-
dential at www.txmca.org.
Melanie E. Grimes is blessed
with a private mediation
practice in Dallas, which
encompasses family and civil
law matters. She is a TMCA
Credentialed Distinguished
Mediator and was honored
with the Louis Weber Award
as “Outstanding Mediator of the Year.”
Melanie serves as the TAM representative to
the TMCA Board of Directors.
Texas Mediator Credentialing Association Update
By Melanie E. Grimes
THE TEXAS MEDIATOR 18 www.txmediator.org
Calendar of Events
continued from page 18
Dallas/Fort Worth Area (cont.)
El Centro College, (972) 296-5900, www.elcentrocollege.edu
(Most courses are offered on Thursday, Saturday and Sundays)
Introduction to Negotiation - Starting February 6, 2014
Introduction to Mediation - Starting April 3, 2014
Introduction to Divorce Mediation - Starting February 27, 2014
Intro to Conflict Dynamics - Starting March 20, 2014
Advanced Mediation - Starting May 8, 2014
Intro to Cross-Cultures Dispute Resolution - Starting April 24, 2014
MEDIATION DYNAMICS, (817) 926-5555, www.MediationDynamics.com
30-hour Family Mediation Training - February 22-23 & March 1-2, 2014
Professional Services & Education, (214) 526-4525, www.conflicthappens.com
Basic Mediation - February 1-13, 2014; June 16-19, 2014, October 13-16, 2014
Family Mediation - March 24-26, 2014, November 17-19, 2014
HOUSTON
Manousso Mediation Training and ADR Services - (713) 840-0828, www.manousso.us
Advance Family-Divorce-Child Custody - February 28, March 1 - 2, 2014
Arbitration - March 3, 2014
Basic Mediation - 40 hours certificate - March 27 - 30, 2014
SAN MARCOS
Central Texas Dispute Resolution Center (DRC), (512) 878-0382, www.hcdrc.org
Mediation and Film: Hollywood and the TMCA Code of Ethics - February 26, 2014
Kerrville
Hill Country DRC, www. hillcountrydrc. org or (830) 792-5000, [email protected]
40-Hour Basic Mediation Training—March 27-29, 2014 and April 10-11, 2014
Lubbock
Lubbock County Office of Dispute Resolution, (806) 775-1720, www.co.lubbock.tx.us
Basic Mediation Training - May 19 - 23, 2014
Waco
Baylor Law School and the McLennan County Dispute Resolution Center (DRC), (254) 752-0955, [email protected]
Basic Mediation Training - February 20 - Mar 1, 2014
THE TEXAS MEDIATOR 19 www.txmediator.org
Officers And Directors TAM OFFICERS
President Melynda Gulley, San Antonio [email protected], 210-828-9162
President-Elect Ralph E. (Gene) Roberts Jr., Huntsville [email protected]; 936-294-1717
Secretary Toylaine Spencer, Houston [email protected], 512-461-3269
Treasurer Meg Walker, Galveston [email protected], 409-744-2449
Immediate Past President Portia Brown, The Woodlands [email protected], 281-367-2483
TAM DIRECTORS
Erich M. Birch, Austin [email protected], 512-349-9300
Kathleen Dial, San Marcos [email protected], 860-798-9367 Lori LaConta, Houston [email protected], 832-651-8735
David A. Ladensohn, San Antonio [email protected], 210-557-4744 Adam McGough, Dallas [email protected], 214-876-0582 Christina S. Schroer. Cedar Park [email protected], 512-689-9819
Membership Chair Margaret Leeds, San Antonio [email protected], 210-281-9628
Historian Suzanne Mann Duvall, Dallas no email, 214-361-0802
Newsletter Editor Linda Gibson, Temple [email protected], 254-771-3468
Social Media Chair Pattie Porter, San Antonio pmporter@conflict connections.com, 210-880-4440 TMCA Representative Melanie Grimes, Dallas [email protected], 214-369-3690
PRSRT STD
U.S. Postage
PAID
Temple, Texas
Permit # 238
Dated Material
Forwarding and Address
Correction Requested
The Texas Mediator
P.O. Box 2537
Galveston, Texas 77553-2537
THE TEXAS MEDIATOR www.txmediator.org