instantaneous gelation in smoluchowski's coagulation equation revisited, american physical...

8

Click here to load reader

Upload: colm-connaughton

Post on 29-Jun-2015

348 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

American Physical Society March Meeting, Portland Oregon, March 19 2010

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Instantaneous Gelation in Smoluchowski's Coagulation Equation Revisited, American Physical Society March Meeting, Portland Oregon, March 19 2010

university-logo

Instantaneous Gelation in Smoluchowski’sCoagulation Equation Revisited

R.C. Ball1 C. Connaughton1 T.H.M. Stein2 O.Zaboronski1

1University of Warwick, UK2University of Reading, UK

APS March Meeting, Portland19 March 2010

[email protected] Instantaneous Gelation

Page 2: Instantaneous Gelation in Smoluchowski's Coagulation Equation Revisited, American Physical Society March Meeting, Portland Oregon, March 19 2010

university-logo

Cluster aggregation: (m1) + (m2)→ (m1 + m2)

Size distribution: Nm(t) satisfies (mean field) :

∂tNm =

∫ m

0dm1K (m1,m −m1)Nm1Nm−m1

− 2Nm

∫ ∞0

dm1K (m,m1)Nm1 + J δ(m − 1)

(Smoluchowski, 1916)

Many applications exhibit scaling:

Micro-physics encoded in kernel:K (am1,am2) = aµ+νK (m1,m2)

K (m1,m2) ∼ mµ1 mν

2 m1�m2

Typical size, s(t):N(m, t) ∼ s(t)aF (m/s(t))

F (x) ∼ x−y x� 1

[email protected] Instantaneous Gelation

Page 3: Instantaneous Gelation in Smoluchowski's Coagulation Equation Revisited, American Physical Society March Meeting, Portland Oregon, March 19 2010

university-logo

Gelation Transition (Lushnikov [1977], Ziff [1980])

M(t) for K (m1,m2) = (m1m2)3/4.

M(t) =∫∞

0 m N(m, t) dm isformally conserved. However forµ+ ν > 1:

M(t) <∫ ∞

0m N(m,0) dm t > t∗

Best studied by introducingcut-off, Mmax, and studying limitMmax →∞. (Laurencot [2004])

Instantaneous GelationIf ν > 1 then t∗ = 0. (Van Dongen & Ernst [1987])May be complete: M(t) = 0 for t > 0. Example :K (m1,m2) = m1+ε

1 + m1+ε2 for ε > 0.

Mathematically pathological?

[email protected] Instantaneous Gelation

Page 4: Instantaneous Gelation in Smoluchowski's Coagulation Equation Revisited, American Physical Society March Meeting, Portland Oregon, March 19 2010

university-logo

Instantaneous Gelation in Regularised System

Yet there are applications with ν > 1: differential sedimentation,gravitationally clustering.

M(t) for K (m1,m2) = (m1m2)3/4.

With cut-off, Mmax, regularizedgelation time, t∗Mmax

, is clearlyidentifiable.t∗Mmax

decreases as Mmaxincreases.Van Dongen & Ernst recovered inlimit Mmax →∞.

Decrease of t∗Mmaxas Mmax is very slow (numerics suggest

logarithmic decrease). This suggests such models arephysically reasonable.Consistent with related results of Krapivsky and Ben-Naimand Krapivsky [2003] on exchange-driven growth.

[email protected] Instantaneous Gelation

Page 5: Instantaneous Gelation in Smoluchowski's Coagulation Equation Revisited, American Physical Society March Meeting, Portland Oregon, March 19 2010

university-logo

Nonlocal Interactions Drive Instantaneous Gelation

Total density,R∞

0 N(m, t) dm for

K (m1,m2) = m1 + m2 and source.

Instantaneous gelation is drivenby the runaway absorbtion ofsmall clusters by large ones.This is clear from the analyticallytractable (but non-gelling)marginal kernel, m1 + m2, withsource of monomers.M(t) ∼ t (due to source) butN(t) ∼ 1/t .

If the exponent ν > 1 then big clusters are so “hungry" that theyeat all smaller clusters at a rate which diverges with the cut-off,Mmax. (cf “addition model" (Brilliantov & Krapivsky [1992],Laurencot [1999])).

[email protected] Instantaneous Gelation

Page 6: Instantaneous Gelation in Smoluchowski's Coagulation Equation Revisited, American Physical Society March Meeting, Portland Oregon, March 19 2010

university-logo

Stationary State in the presence of a source

With cut-off, a stationary state may be reached if a source ofmonomers is present (Horvai et al [2007]) even though no suchstate exists in the unregularized system.

Non-local stationary state (theory vs

numerics) for ν = 3/2.

Introduce model kernelK (m1,m2) = max(mν

1 ,mν2).

Stationary state expressible via arecursion relation.Asymptotics:

N(m) ∼ A m−ν m� 1

Amplitude vanishes slowly asMmax →∞Decay near monomer scaleseems exponential.

[email protected] Instantaneous Gelation

Page 7: Instantaneous Gelation in Smoluchowski's Coagulation Equation Revisited, American Physical Society March Meeting, Portland Oregon, March 19 2010

university-logo

Approach to Stationary State is non-trivial

Total density vs time forK (m1,m2) = m1+ε

1 + m1+ε2 .

“Q-factor" for ν = 0.2.

Numerics indicate that theapproach to stationary state isnon-trivial.Collective oscillations of the totaldensity of clusters.Numerical measurements of theQ-factor of these oscillationssuggests that they are long-livedtransients. Last longer as Mmaxincreases.Heuristic explanation in terms of“reset” mechanism.

[email protected] Instantaneous Gelation

Page 8: Instantaneous Gelation in Smoluchowski's Coagulation Equation Revisited, American Physical Society March Meeting, Portland Oregon, March 19 2010

university-logo

Conclusions

As has been known since the 1980’s, the Mmax →∞ limitof the regularized Smoluchowski equation is pathologicalfor kernels having ν > 1 but lots of interesting thingshappen along the way.Weak dependence of the regularized system on the valueof Mmax mean that such kernels are reasonable physicalmodels (of intermediate asymptotics).Regularized system reaches a stationary state in thepresence of a source of monomers which is not of theusual “cascade" type.Long-lived oscillatory transient seems to result frominteraction between the cut-off and the source (“reset"phenomenon).

[email protected] Instantaneous Gelation