institutional effectiveness and the national community college benchmark project
DESCRIPTION
Institutional Effectiveness and the National Community College Benchmark Project. Dr. Glynis Daniels Dr. Ceil Connelly- Weida Lehigh Carbon Community College Middle States Commission on Higher Education Annual Conference December 2011, Washington DC. About LCCC. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Institutional Effectiveness and the National Community College Benchmark Project
Dr. Glynis Daniels Dr. Ceil Connelly-Weida Lehigh Carbon Community College
Middle States Commission on Higher Education Annual Conference
December 2011, Washington DC
11,700 students AY 2010-2011:- 58% part-time - 62% female - 28% Non-white - Median Age: 23
About LCCC
NCCBP: National Community College Benchmark Project
Johnson County Community College, Kansas 2011 – 280 community colleges participated
34 Benchmarks Regional Demographics College Structure and Staffing Student Demographics Student Success Non-Credit and Workforce Training Finance http://www.nccbp.org
NCCBP: Standard Feedback Reports
National Percentiles State Percentiles Best Practices – lists colleges above 85th
percentile for each benchmark (by permission) Strengths Report – list of benchmarks for
which your college reaches 85th percentile or above
NEW – Online tool for creating peer comparisons using at least 5 institutions you name
NEW - Online tool for creating peer comparisons by specifying demographic criteria
PACCC:Pennsylvania Commission for Community
Colleges
Institutional Effectiveness: Finance
2006 (FY 2004-2005)
2007 (FY 2005-2006)
2008 (FY 2006-2007)
2009 (FY 2007-2008)
2010 (FY 2008-2009)
2011 (FY 2009-2010)
$-
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
LCCCNCCBP 50th
Annual Assessment: Expenditures Per Credit HourGoal: To approach median
Institutional Effectiveness: Non Credit Instruction and Workforce
Development Non Credit Instruction:
• Headcount & Seatcount
• Market Penetration
Workforce
Development• Duplicated
Headcount• Companies Served• Total Costs• Total Revenues• Net Revenue• Net Revenue as %
of Total
Institutional Effectiveness: Workforce Development
2005 (FY 2004)
2006 (FY 2005)
2007 (FY 2006)
2008 (FY 2007
2009 (FY 2008)
2010 (FY 2009)
2011 (FY 2010)
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
LCCCNational 50th
Duplicated Headcount Goal : Approach 68th Percentile (77th FY2010)
Institutional Effectiveness: Workforce DevelopmentTotal Revenue
Goal: Approach 68th Percentile (81st in FY 2010)
2005 (FY
2004)
2006 (FY
2005)
2007 (FY
2006)
2008 (FY
2007
2009 (FY
2008)
2010 (FY
2009)
2011 (FY
2010)
$-
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
LCCCNational 50th
Institutional Effectiveness: Workforce DevelopmentTotal Costs
Goal: Approach 68th Percentile (72nd in FY 2010)
2005 (FY 2004)
2006 (FY 2005)
2007 (FY 2006)
2008 (FY 2007
2009 (FY 2008)
2010 (FY 2009)
2011 (FY 2010)
$-
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
LCCCNational 50th
Institutional Effectiveness: Workforce DevelopmentNet Revenue
Goal: Approach 95th Percentile ( 91st in FY 2010)
2005 (FY 2004)
2006 (FY 2005)
2007 (FY 2006)
2008 (FY 2007
2009 (FY 2008)
2010 (FY 2009)
2011 (FY 2010)
$-
$100,000.0
$200,000.0
$300,000.0
$400,000.0
$500,000.0
$600,000.0
$700,000.0
LCCCNational 50th
Institutional Effectiveness: Credit Student Success
Cohort Retention Term Retention Course Retention Developmental Indicators College-Level Indicators
Best Practice: Make Definitions Prominent
Institutional Effectiveness: Cohort Retention & Success
Full- and Part-Time Entering Cohorts• 3-Year Graduation• 3-Year Transfer• 3-Year Graduation or Transfer
Cohort Success
Fall 03 Fall 04 Fall 05 Fall 06 Fall 07 Fall 08 Fall 0905
101520253035404550
Students Graduating or Transferring Within Three Years
First Time, Full-time Entering CohortsFall 2003 through Fall 2009 (NCCBP Data)
Perc
ent
Gra
duat
ing
or T
rans
ferr
ing
Cohort Success
Fall 03 Fall 04 Fall 05 Fall 06 Fall 07 Fall 08 Fall 090
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Students Graduating or Transferring Within Three Years
First Time, Part-time Entering CohortsFall 2003 through Fall 2009 (NCCBP Data)
Perc
ent
Gra
duat
ing
or T
rans
ferr
ing
Institutional Effectiveness: Term Retention
Fall Credit Students Who Enrolled Next Spring
Fall Credit Students Who Enrolled Next Fall
Term Retention
Fall 03 Fall 04 Fall 05 Fall 06 Fall 07 Fall 08 Fall 090
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
LCCC Credit Students Who Enrolled Next TermFall 2003 through Fall 2009 (NCCBP Data)
Pers
iste
nce
Rat
e (P
erce
nt)
Institutional Effectiveness
Fall 03 Fall 04 Fall 05 Fall 06 Fall 07 Fall 08 Fall 090
10
20
30
40
50
60
LCCC Credit Students Who Enrolled Next FallFall 2003 through Fall 2009 (NCCBP Data)Pe
rsis
tenc
e R
ate
(Per
cent
)
Institutional Effectiveness: Course Retention
College-Level Course Retention Distance Course Retention Developmental Course Retention - Math Developmental Course Retention -
English Developmental Course Retention -
Reading
Institutional Effectiveness
Fall 03 Fall 04 Fall 05 Fall 06 Fall 07 Fall 08 Fall 0950
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
LCCC College-Level Course Retention Rates Fall 2003 through Fall 2009 (NCCBP Data)
Ret
enti
on R
ate
(Per
cent
)
Institutional Effectiveness
Fall 03 Fall 04 Fall 05 Fall 06 Fall 07 Fall 08 Fall 0950
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
LCCC Distance Education Course Retention Rates Fall 2003 through Fall 2009 (NCCBP Data)
Ret
enti
on R
ate
(Per
cent
)
Intro to Psych Course Retention
Number Enrolled Completion Rate
Distance Schnecksville Distance Schnecksville
Spring 2008 92 412 75% 82%
Fall 2008 112 520 72% 82%
Spring 2009 88 408 68% 82%
Fall 2009 106 705 74% 89%
Spring 2010 100 488 89% 84%
Fall 2010 101 638 94% 88%
Number Enrolled Retention RateDistance Main Distance Main
Spring 2008 92 412 75% 82%Fall 2008 112 520 72% 82%Spring 2009 88 408 68% 82%Fall 2009 106 705 74% 89%Spring 2010 100 488 89% 84%Fall 2010 101 638 94% 88%
Institutional Effectiveness
Fall 03 Fall 04 Fall 05 Fall 06 Fall 07 Fall 08 Fall 0950
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
LCCC Developmental Course Retention Rates - Math Fall 2003 through Fall 2009 (NCCBP Data)
Ret
enti
on R
ate
(Per
cent
)
Institutional Effectiveness: College Level Indicators
College-Level Course Retention (repeated)
College-Level Course Completer Success
Student Retention in Core Academic Skill Areas -English Composition I, English Composition II, Algebra, and Speech
Student Completer Success Rates in Core Academic Skill Areas -English Composition I, English Composition II, Algebra, and Speech
Institutional Effectiveness
Fall 03 Fall 04 Fall 05 Fall 06 Fall 07 Fall 08 Fall 090
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
LCCC College-Level Course Completer Success RatesFall 2003 through Fall 2009 (NCCBP Data)
Succ
ess
Rat
e (P
erce
nt)
Institutional Effectiveness
Fall 03 Fall 04 Fall 05 Fall 06 Fall 07 Fall 08 Fall 090
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
LCCC Student Retention in Core Academic Skill Areas -English Composition I
Fall 2003 through Fall 2009 Cohorts (NCCBP Data)
Stud
ent
Ret
enti
on R
ate
(Per
cent
)
Institutional Effectiveness
Fall 03 Fall 04 Fall 05 Fall 06 Fall 07 Fall 08 Fall 090
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
LCCC Student Retention in Core Academic Skill Areas -English Composition II
Fall 2003 through Fall 2009 Cohorts (NCCBP Data)
Stud
ent
Ret
enti
on R
ate
(Per
cent
)
Institutional Effectiveness
Fall 03 Fall 04 Fall 05 Fall 06 Fall 07 Fall 08 Fall 090
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
LCCC Student Retention in Core Academic Skill Areas -Algebra
Fall 2003 through Fall 2009 Cohorts (NCCBP Data)
Stud
ent
Ret
enti
on R
ate
(Per
cent
)
Institutional Effectiveness: Developmental Indicators Developmental Course Retention –
Math, English, and Reading (repeated)
Developmental Student Retention in First College-Level Course –Math and Writing
Developmental Completer Success Rate in First College-Level Course –Math, and Writing
Institutional Effectiveness
Fall 02 Fall 03 Fall 04 Fall 05 Fall 06 Fall 07 Fall 080
20
40
60
80
100
120
LCCC Developmental Student Retention in First Col-lege-Level Course - Writing
Fall 2002 through Fall 2008 Cohorts (NCCBP Data)
Stud
ent
Ret
enti
on R
ate
(Per
cent
)
Institutional Effectiveness
Fall 02 Fall 03 Fall 04 Fall 05 Fall 06 Fall 07 Fall 080
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
LCCC Developmental Completer Success Rates in First College-Level Course - Writing
Fall 2002 through Fall 2008 (NCCBP Data)
Stud
ent
Succ
ess
Rat
e (P
erce
nt)
Future Directions
QUESTIONS
Glynis Daniels, Ph. D., Associate Dean of Institutional Research [email protected] 610.799.1936
Ceil Connelly-Weida, Ph.D. Associate Dean of Planning and Assessment [email protected] 610.799.1630
Contact Information