institutional investors v. beecher carlson - copyright infringement complaint.pdf

Upload: mark-h-jaffe

Post on 02-Jun-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Institutional Investors v. Beecher Carlson - copyright infringement complaint.pdf

    1/18

    JS 44C/SDNY

    REV. 4/2014

    CIVILCOVER SHEET

    The

    JS 44 civif cover sheet and the information

    contained herein

    nejUjer

    pleadings

    or

    other papers as

    required

    bylaw/_fcept a__rovided _Ti

    Judicial

    Conference

    oftheUnited

    States

    in

    Se_krnb_r_74

    is

    reSired

    initiatingthe civildocket sheet.

    ice

    nor

    suppler

    of court. Thii

    se

    o f

    th e

    Clerk

    th e

    NOV 05 U

    PLAINTIFFS

    INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR, LLC

    ATTORNEYS(FIRM

    NAME,

    ADDRESS, ANDTELEPHONE NUMBER

    Thomas

    M.

    Lancia

    PLLC

    22

    Cortlandt

    Street,

    16th

    Floor

    New York, New York 10007

    212-964-3157

    D

    CAUSE

    OF

    ACTION CITE THE

    U.S. CIVIL

    STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING AND WRITE

    A

    BRIEF STATEMENT

    OF CAUSB

    DO NOT

    CITE

    JURISDICTIONAL STATUTES UNLESS

    DIVERSITY)

    17

    U.S.C.

    501

    etseq. Cause

    of

    action

    stems from Defendants

    violation

    of Plaintiff s copyright

    in online

    published articles

    DEFENDANTS

    BEECHER CARLSON HOLDINGS, INC.and

    TIMOTHY VICCARI

    ATTORNEYS(IF

    KNOWN)

    Has this

    action, case, or proceeding, or one

    essentially

    the same

    been

    previously filed

    in

    SDNY at any

    time? N

  • 8/10/2019 Institutional Investors v. Beecher Carlson - copyright infringement complaint.pdf

    2/18

    PLACEAN x INONEBOXONLY

    ORIGIN

    1 1

    1

    Original

    U 2 Removed

    from

    Lj 3 Remanded D 4 Reinstated or __ 5

    Transferred from

    Q 6 Multidistrict

    Proceeding State Court from Reopened

    Specify

    District Litigation

    a.

    allparttesnpnMntod

    Appellate

    L~J Court

    (_] b. Atleast

    one

    party

    Uprose .

    PLACEAN

    XINONEBOXONLY

    BAS|SOF

    JURISDICTION

    D 1 U.S. PLAINTIFF Q2 U.S. DEFENDANT __ 3 FEDERAL QUESTION

    Q4

    DIVERSITY

    (U.S. NOTA PARTY)

    t~l 7

    Appeal

    toDistrict

    Judge

    from

    Magistrate

    Judge

    Judgment

    IFDIVERSITY

    INDI TE

    CITIZENSHIP

    ELOW

    CITIZENSHIP

    OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES

    FOR

    DIVERSITY

    CASES

    ONLY)

    (Place an [X] inone boxfor

    Plaintiff

    and one box for Defendant)

    PT F

    DE F

    CITIZENOF THIS STATE [ ] 1 [ ] 1

    CITIZEN OF ANOTHERSTATE [ ] 2 [ ] 2

    CITIZEN

    OR SUBJECT OF A

    FOREIGN COUNTRY

    PT F

    DE F

    [ ] 3 [ ] 3

    PTF DEF

    INCORPORATEDand

    PRINCIPAL

    PLACE [ ] 5 [ ] 5

    OF BUSINESS IN ANOTHERSTATE

    INCORPORATED or

    PRINCIPAL PLACE

    [ ] 4 [ ] 4

    OF

    BUSINESS IN

    THISSTATE

    FOREIGN NATION

    PLAINTIFF S) ADDRESS(ES)

    AND

    COUNTY IES)

    Institutional Investor, LLC

    2 25 P ar k

    Avenue Sout h

    New

    York,

    New

    York 10003

    DEFENDANT S) ADDRESS(ES)AND COUNTY IES)

    Beecher Carlson Holdings, Inc

    120

    West 45th

    Street, 30th Floor

    New

    York,

    New

    York 10036

    Timothy Viccari

    120 West 45th

    Street, 30th Floor

    New York, New York

    10036

    [ ]6

    [ ]6

    DEFENDANT(S)

    ADDRESS

    UNKNOWN

    REPRESENTATION IS

    HEREBY

    MADE

    THAT, ATTHISTIME, I HAVE BEEN UNABLE,

    WITH

    REASONABLE DILIGENCE, TOASCERTAIN

    RESIBENCE ADDRESSES

    OF

    THE

    FOLLOWING DEFENDANTS:

    Check

    one:

    THIS

    ACTION SHOULD BE ASSIGNED

    TO:

    WHITE PLAINS __ MANHATTAN

    (DO

    NOTj*ectre^ner

    box ifthis a PRISONER PETJTION/PRISONER

    CIVIL

    RIGHTS

    CON

    ADMITTED TO

    PRACTICE

    IN

    THIS

    DISTRICT

    [ ]

    NO

    / O 1

    M

    YES

    DATE ADMITTED Mo.

    _

    Yr

    7.A-

    Magistrate Judge is to be designated by the Clerk of the Coi

    Magistrate Judge

    Attorney Bar Code # J2 /V(f_)

    mjm m

    is so Designated.

    Ruby J.

    Krajick,

    Clerk of Court by

    Deputy Clerk, DATED.

    UNITED

    STATES DISTRICT COURT(NEWYORKSOUTHERN)

  • 8/10/2019 Institutional Investors v. Beecher Carlson - copyright infringement complaint.pdf

    3/18

    4 CV

    88 9

    Thomas

    M.

    Lancia

    PLLC

    By: Thomas M. Lancia, Esq.

    22 Cort landt S t ree t

    16th

    Floor

    New

    York,

    New

    York 10007

    212.964.3157

    UNITED STATES D ISTRICT

    COURT

    SOUTHERN DISTRICT

    OF

    NEW YORK

    INSTITUTIONAL

    INVESTOR,

    LLC

    Plaintiff,

    BEECHER CARLSON HOLDINGS, INC. and

    TIMOTHY VICCARI

    Defendants.

    X

    X

    S

    COMPLAINT

    Jury Trial Demanded

    CO

    o

    o

    CO

    :5

    0

    14

    CIV.

    -r,

    -::a

    Plaintiff INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR, LLC ( II or

    Plaintiff),

    by its attorneys,

    Thomas M. Lancia PLLC, brings this civil action against Defendants BEECHER CARLSON

    HOLDINGS, INC ( Beecher ) and TIMOTHY VICCARI ( Viccari ) (collectively

    Defendants ) and complains as follows:

    PART IES AND

    JURISDICTION

    1. By this Complaint, II seeks statutory damages, actual damages, compensatory

    damages, treble damages, punitive and exemplary damages, injunctive relief, and their attorneys'

    fees and costs pursuant to the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. 501

    et seq

    breach

    of

    contract, fraud

    and deceit, and misappropriation

    of

    confidential business information and/or trade secrets.

    II is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place

    of

    business at

  • 8/10/2019 Institutional Investors v. Beecher Carlson - copyright infringement complaint.pdf

    4/18

    225 Park Avenue South,

    New

    York,

    New

    York 10003. Beecher is a Delaware Corporation with

    its corporate

    offices

    in

    Atlanta, Georgia and

    an

    office

    at 120 West

    45th Street,

    30th Floor, New

    York, New York 10036. Viccari was at all pertinent times an employee ofBeecher.

    3. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a), the Court has subject matter

    jurisdiction over the

    Plaintiffs

    claims for copyright infringement, brought under the Copyright

    Act, 28 U.S.C. 501 et seq ; The Court has supplemental jur isdict ion over the Plaintiffs

    remaining claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1338(b) and 1367.

    4. In its license agreement with Plaintiff, Defendants consented to the exercise of

    personal jurisdiction by this Court.

    5. Additionally, upon information and belief, this Court has personal jurisdiction

    over Defendants because it (a) purposefully directs activities towards the state of New York,

    including financial trading; (b) regularly conducts and solicits business in the state

    of

    New York;

    (c) derives substantial revenues from goods and/or services provided to customers in the state

    of

    New York; and/or (d) regularly and purposefully accessed

    Plaintiffs

    servers located in

    New

    York.

    6. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to, interalia 28 U.S.C. 1400(a).

    FACTUAL BACKGROUND

    7. Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC ( Euromoney ) is one

    of

    Europe's largest

    business and financial magazine publishers, delivering business information to various sectors,

    including finance, law, and energy, for over thirty-five years. Euromoney publishes print and

    online magazines, journals, and newsletters among other things. II is the United States

  • 8/10/2019 Institutional Investors v. Beecher Carlson - copyright infringement complaint.pdf

    5/18

    subsidiary

    of

    Euromoney. II owns copyrights in both

    of

    its print and online editions

    of

    publications, journals, ebooks and the like. Publications are registered with the Untied States

    Copyright Office and regularly updated. Among those online publications is a series of

    sophisticated, timely, unique and highly coveted niche market e-magazines provided under the

    rubric II Intelligence. Though anyone can purchase them, these e-magazines are not usually

    marketed to the general public but rather are frequently purchased by fund managers, compliance

    officers and other business executives. Within II Intelligence, there are several niche market

    online publications, such as Money Management Intelligence, Foundations and Endowments,

    Compliance Intelligence, Real Estate Intelligence, Fund Industry Intelligence and so on. In each

    of

    these areas, II delivers clearly organized and customized content, including news, data and

    features, quickly but carefully developed at substantial cost to II, addressing the subscribers'

    need for timely and pertinent information to stay abreast

    of

    the market. Subscribers, including

    some of the most prominent governmental and financial institutions in the United States,

    recognize the considerable benefit reaped from these online publications and are generally

    content to pay a commensurate fee for it.

    8. Within Institutional Investor Intelligence lies Power Intelligence, an exclusive

    daily information service focused on the power industry, providing updated news, features,

    analysisand data, includingproject finance in generation, transmissionand midstreamgas assets.

    Power Intelligence is provided through a password-protected internet website available only to

    subscribers ( Website ). Subscribers pay for single or multiple user licenses for a fee to access

    t h e content

    contained on the

    website.

  • 8/10/2019 Institutional Investors v. Beecher Carlson - copyright infringement complaint.pdf

    6/18

    9. The first time the Website is accessed by a new subscriber, he or she must

    affirmatively indicate agreement with the terms and conditions

    of

    the Website before he or she is

    permitted to view the exclusive and unique content. Among those terms and conditions are

    provisions pertaining to use. Section 3.2 of the Terms and Conditions expressly states that

    [y]ou agree to use the Sites and the Content solely for your own personal use and benefit and

    not for resale or other transfer or disposition to any other person or entity. Further, Section 6.4

    o f

    the

    Te rms and Condit ions s ta tes

    that:

    Except to the extent a user name and password is intended for more than one licensed

    user as agreed by us in writing, the following are not permitted:

    a) any Registered User, Subscriber or licensed user under any

    subscription sharing their user name and password;

    (b) access through a single name and password being made

    available to multiple users on a network. . .

    Finally, Section 3.5 cautions:

    If

    it is brought to our attention that you have sold, published,

    distributed, retransmitted or otherwise provided access to any article(s) from the Content to

    anyone without our express prior written permission, we will invoice you for copyright abuse

    damages

    of

    US$1500 per article unless you can show that you have not infringed any copyright,

    which will be payable immediately on receipt of the invoice.

    10. Despite the terms

    of

    this license, the Website was used to support the Beecher's

    operations well in excess

    of

    the use authorized by Plaintiff. Indeed, the

    Plaintiffs

    internet

    website logs for Beecher indicate a frequent, repetitive and nearly simultaneous access far in

    excess of a typical single user, including numerous occasions when multiple users accessed the

    exact same Website materials at nearly the same time.

  • 8/10/2019 Institutional Investors v. Beecher Carlson - copyright infringement complaint.pdf

    7/18

    11. Plaintiff offers subscriptions to the Website in electronic format, allowing

    subscribers to browse and search the Website and its content easily and efficiently. The format

    is updated frequently and

    new

    materials are added on a daily basis. Emails are sent daily

    informing the user of the content and the user can save articles or other data in files maintained

    and controlled by the Plaintiff for easy access at a later date. Each week, all

    of

    the articles

    posted to the Website during that week are made available to subscribers in one place, as an

    electronic newsletter, comprised

    of

    up to twenty eight (28) pages

    of

    articles. Subscribers are

    able to email articles to other individuals. Print copies are also sent to all subscribers.

    12. Every subscriber has a confidential password and identification number unique to

    his or her account. The password must be entered manually into the subscriber 's individual

    computer terminal, laptop, or mobile device, which then triggers a technological process

    providing access to the

    Plaintiffs

    server by the server accessed by that individual computer

    terminal, laptop, or mobile device. The servers in turn usually talk at least in part via satellite.

    13. The Website constitutes original material authored, l icensed or purchased by II.

    Plaintiff has complied with the copyright laws and is the exclusive owner of the copyrights

    therein, including all rights infringed by Defendants.

    14. The Register

    of

    Copyrights has issued Certificates

    of

    Registration for the Website

    and related updates.

    15. II regularly monitors the Website using Back Office Administration Tool

    ( BOAT ) tracking software.

    BOAT

    tracks every action taken by an individual user s account,

    including Website logons and article and page views. This information is contained in an Excel

  • 8/10/2019 Institutional Investors v. Beecher Carlson - copyright infringement complaint.pdf

    8/18

    spreadsheet containing confidential business information and as such cannot be attached to this

    Complaint on the date

    of

    filing. When unauthorized access is suspected, II employees must sift

    through the information and compile it into a format that is readily and easily understood, taking

    up employee time at great company expense.

    16. On April 1, 2014, when beginning his subscription to the Website, Viccari agreed

    affirmatively to the Terms and Conditions for accessing the Website by clicking on the button

    indicating as such. At all pertinent times, Viccari was acting within the scope

    of

    his employment

    with Beecher. He paid for a single, one year user license.

    17. Despite the agreement by Beecher and Viccari to abide by the Terms and

    Conditions, Website logs confirmed that multiple users accessed the Website and exceeded the

    number

    of

    users permitted for the fee paid. These unauthorized users accessed the Website

    without au thori za ti on f rom

    th e

    Plaintiff. Plaintiffs

    account

    e xe cu tiv e f or V ic ca ri is su ed a

    verbal warning on June 1, 2014 and that warning went unheeded.

    18. A smattering

    of

    the numerous abuses

    of

    the Website and its invaluable content by

    Beecher tells the tale of numerous unauthorized users. Infringing conduct occurred in the form

    of

    multiple and nearly simultaneous Website article views in excess

    of

    the typical use

    of

    a single

    user. For example, on June 3, 2014, Viccari 's account information was used to visi t the News

    channel two distinct times at 21:08, and view DTE Moves To Buy NextEra Wind Farm at

    21:08, and then Arclight Tees Up Bayonne Purchase, Refi, DOE Staffer Joins Texas Shop

    and PPA Pulse: Wind, Solar Bring Home Contracts all at 21:09. Each one

    of

    the articles

    viewed on that date was printed at 21:09. On June 4, 2014, DTE Moves To Buy NextEra Wind

    Farm was viewed again, as were Bay Area Shop Preps For 1st Rated PACE-Backed

  • 8/10/2019 Institutional Investors v. Beecher Carlson - copyright infringement complaint.pdf

    9/18

    Securitization and Germany EPC Unit Snags Maiden Wind Tax Equity all at 21:49.

    Similarly, on June 16, 2014, Viccari's username and password was used to visit the News

    channel

    three times, twice at 20:53 and another

    time

    at

    21:05.

    Three articles were viewed

    and

    then printed in the same minute, at 21:05 - Exelon Hawks CCGT Pair Separately, Developer

    Ropes NADB As Lender To Texas Solar, and Plastina Joins

    New

    AIG-Backed Outfit. On

    July 7, 2014, at 16:24 the Login

    New

    and News channels were both visited; SoCalEd Sizes Up

    Small-Scale Renewable PPA Prospects and The Buzz: Cape Wind Checks Another Box were

    viewed at 16:56; at 21:23 Rockland Hawks Eagle Point and Macquarie Unit Buys N.M. Wind

    Farm were both viewed and printed; at 21:24 SoCalEd Sizes Up Small-Scale Renewable PPA

    Prospects and

    PPA

    Pulse: Solar Developmers Rake In Offtake Contracts were printed and

    viewed and

    The

    Buzz: Cape Wind Checks Another

    Box

    was also viewed. There are many

    more instances

    of

    multiple views at nearly the same time from the same server.

    19. The activity described above continued through June 2014. For example, on June

    5,2014, Viccari 's account was used to log on to the Website, visit both the Login New and News

    channels, view ArcLight Lauches Bayonne Refi, DTE Launches Gas-Fired RFP. NRG

    Yield Ropes Alta Wind, and

    BayWa s

    U.S. Unit Snags Maiden Wind Tax Equity, and print

    each of those articles, all during a single minute at 21:12; BayWa's U.S. Unit Snags Maiden

    Wind Tax Equity was viewed again at 21:22. The next day, June 6, 2014, at 20:51, the account

    visited the News channel, viewed Fore Driving Range Trades In For Solar and printed

    Broker Offers PTC Insurance To Sidestep Qualification Concerns. Finally, on June 9, 2014,

    Beecher employees using Viccari's account logged on to the Website at 14:45 and visited the

    Login New and News Channels before viewing Fore Driving Range Trades In For Solar in

    the same minute. Then, at 21:57 that day, the articles Details Surface On

    EIF s

    Neward Gas-

  • 8/10/2019 Institutional Investors v. Beecher Carlson - copyright infringement complaint.pdf

    10/18

    Fired Deal and Oaktree To Buy Highstar were both viewed and printed, while 11th Annual

    Deals & Firms Of The Year Awards was viewed at 21:57 and again at 21:59. The pattern of

    behavior was even more obvious on June 20, 2014, when in

    just

    two minutes, 20:55 and 20:56,

    the Login

    New

    and News channels were visited, and Details Emerge On SunEdison's Silver

    Ridge Deal, Goldman Chases Infigen Tax Equity Stakes, TSX-Listed Recycled Energy Shop

    Hunts Buyer, Tenaska Inks $450M Solar Financing, and ArcLight Wraps Bayonne TLC,

    Cinches Pricing were all viewed and printed. APS Issues RFP To Buy Solar Pair was printed

    at 21:43 on June 25, 2014 and SunEdison Buys Solar Portfolio From Boston Developer and

    Northwestern Kicks

    Off

    Montana Renewable

    RFP

    were both printed at 21:44 that day.

    Viccari's account on July 14, 2014 was very active - at 21:13, the Login New and News

    channels were visited, Hudson Clean Energy Inks Loan With Resi Solar Shop was viewed

    twice and then printed, and AES Nixes Ohio Gen Sale was viewed and printed; Login New

    was visited again at 21:15 and Calpine Steps Into Unsecured Debt With $2.8B Issuance was

    both viewed and printed; at 21:16 the Login

    New

    and News channels were both visited; and at

    21:17 Hudson Clean Energy Inks Loan With Resi Solar Shop was again viewed and printed.

    20. Most obvious, however, is the blatant printing

    of

    nearly every single article

    published on

    IPs

    Website in between April 1, 2014 and August 1, 2014. During that time

    period, articles were printed approximately 185 times. In addition to the printing described

    above, on July 21, 2014 alone, eight (8) articles were printed in a span

    of

    seven minutes - Ex-

    Ranger Goalie Debuts Distributed Gen Fund at 20:17 and IRS, Treasury

    Aim For

    Guidance,

    CAISO Preps Transmission RFP. Ex-Ranger Goalie Debuts Distributed Gen Fund, Samsung

    Stalks $500M Solar Deal, Solar Shops Find Synergy With Sheep, Q2 League Tables:

    MUFG Reclaims Top Slot, Volume

    Tanks,

    and

    Hancock Goes For

    More Solar

    DG

    were all

  • 8/10/2019 Institutional Investors v. Beecher Carlson - copyright infringement complaint.pdf

    11/18

    printed at 21:24. On June 10, 2014, LS Blueprints Bank Deals To Finance Calpine Acquisition

    and PPL, Riverstone To Merge Unregulated Fleets were both printed at 21:51; Funds Pair On

    Nautilus

    Ontar io Por tfo lio

    and B la ckRock

    Hi res Ba lchandan i

    As U.S. Infra

    Team

    Grows

    were printed at 20:42 on June

    12,2014;

    on June 17, 2014 Industry Current: Micro-Grids As An

    Economic, Resilient Infrastructure and ArcLight Nears Bayonne Commitments were both

    printed at 20:52 and at 20:53, Community Solar Shop Launches Portfolio Equity Sale and

    Exelon Hawks CCGT Pair Separately were likewise printed.

    21. Six (6) different articles were printed at 22:08 on June 24, 2014 - EIF Ink

    $590M For Newark, SunEd Pitches Yieldco B Loan, Dominion Adds EDF Solar Project To

    Growing Portfolio, Cleco Hires Advisory Pair To Parse Inbound Interest, One If By Sale:

    ECP

    Shoots

    For IPP Exit, and Creditors

    Put

    AES Eastern Remnants On Mart. On June 26,

    2014 both REFF Wall Street: Developers

    Look

    To Squeeze Project Costs and REFF Wall

    Street: Sparse Capital Dogs Middle Market were printed at 21:55. The next day at 21:55,

    Exelon Takes Quail Run Bids, Atlantic Power Process Shaped By Uncertainty and Yieldco

    Hype Masks Uncharted Future were all printed. July saw the same type

    of

    unauthorized

    printing by Beecher employees using Viccari 's account. On July 1, 2014, Cape Wine Snags

    Conditional Loan Guarantee, SunEdison Tightens TerraForm Pricing, and Babson Lands

    UBS Banker were all printed at 21:53; on July 11, 2014 Calpine Steps Into Unsecured Debt

    With $2.8B Issuance and U.S. Preps 1.45 GW Offshore Wind Lease Auction were printed at

    20:37, at 20:38 Q&A: Arno Harris, Recurrent Energy,

    Cogan

    Snags Power, Utility Remit For

    Centerview, and BayWa Wind Unit Hunts Development Acquisit ions were all printed, at

    20:39 BlueMountain-Backed Shop Tags Renewable Bigwings was printed and GE EFS

  • 8/10/2019 Institutional Investors v. Beecher Carlson - copyright infringement complaint.pdf

    12/18

    Invests In Texas Panhandle Wind Pair and Palo Alto Launches

    RFP For

    Community Solar

    Program were both printed at 20:40.

    22. The following articles were also printed, among others: Terra-Gen To Buy Small

    Wind Pair From Hinckley and LS Preps To Syndicate Acquisition Financing Deals at 20:40

    on July 6, 2014; Conergy Nabs Funds To Expand Solar Pipeline,

    Optima s

    Coal-Fired Plant

    Set For Court-Run Sale and SunEdison Raises Yieldco List Price at 21:40 on July 7, 2014;

    both Solarcity Tees Up Third Securitization and Starwood Nets Stakes In Texas CCGT Pair

    at 21:25 on July

    22,2014;

    on July

    24,2014 NTE

    Ropes Heavyweights For Gas-Fired Equity at

    22:14 and EIC Dig Into Renewable Projects For First Deal and EDF Buys

    111.

    Wind Farm

    both at 22:15; at 20:50 on July

    25,2014

    both Gas-Fired Blitz Shapes Near-Term PF Landscape

    and The Buzz: Mexican Reform Rolls On; ECP Evaluates Initial EquiPower Bids and

    Entegra, Creditors Pitch Pre-Pack both at 21:49 on July 28, 2014. On July 30, 2014 at 14:48

    NextEra Stalks Gas Pipeline, Utility Growth, SunPower Lands 2d Financing From Harmon,

    and Entegra, Creditors Pitch Pre-Pack [Update] were all printed; Direct Energy Makes Resi

    Solar Play, ECP Nabs Waste-To-Energy Co. From Waste management, and

    NRG

    Yield

    Tees Up Bonds To Finance Alta Deal were printed on July

    31,2014

    at 15:38; finally, on August

    1, 2014 at 14:52 the articles Army Issues RFP For Ala. Solar, Duke Utility Sub To Buy

    Generation Stakes For $1.2B; and Dominion Chases MLP Listing were printed.

    23.

    Viccari s

    account

    was

    a ls o u se d t o a cc es s and download several newslet ters even

    after printing nearly every single article contained on the Website. The newsletter dated April

    14, 2014 was downloaded on that date at 18:49 (6:49 p.m.) while the April 21, 2014 newsletter

    was downloaded on April 22, 2014 at 20:04. Other downloaded newsletters include two

    downloads of the July 7,2014 newsletter, first on July 7, 2014 at 16:57 and again the next day at

    10

  • 8/10/2019 Institutional Investors v. Beecher Carlson - copyright infringement complaint.pdf

    13/18

    22:15; the July 14, 2014 newsletter was downloaded on that date at 17:22; on July 21, 2014 at

    21:47, the July 21, 2014 was downloaded; and the July 28, 2014 newsletter

    was

    downloaded at

    18:56 on that day.

    24. Before a newsletter or any other

    pdf

    is printed or downloaded from the Website,

    the following notice appears as a

    pop

    up on the computer screen:

    This pdf version of Derivatives Intelligence is available to paid subscribers

    only. You User ID

    and

    password are personal to you and sharing of personal

    User ID and

    password constitutes

    a violation

    of the terms of your

    subscription

    . . . Copying of

    this

    publication is in

    violation

    of th e Federal

    Copyright

    law

    (17 U.S.C. 101 et seq.).

    Violators

    shall be subject to criminal

    penal ties as well as liability for substantial money damages, including

    damages

    up

    to 100,000

    per infringement,

    costs

    and attorneys

    fees...

    25. Although this pop up appeared each time an article was printed or downloaded

    from the Website by Beecher employees using Viccari 's subscription, this d id not stop the

    unauthorized users from regularly printing articles.

    26. The type

    of

    printing done by Beecher 's employees is indicative

    of

    numerous

    unauthorized users. It also tends to show that unauthorized reproduction and distribution

    of

    the

    copyrighted materials was rampant and widespread at Beecher.

    AS

    A ND FOR

    A F IRS T CAUSE OF ACT ION FOR D IRECT COPYR IGHT

    I NFR INGEMENT

    27. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through

    26

    of

    this Complaint with the same force and effect as

    if

    set forth fully herein.

    28. Notwithstanding the provision of the Copyright Act that the display, distribution

    and reproduction

    of

    copyrighted works may lawfully be made only by the copyright owner or

    with its authorization, Defendants have willfully and without Plaintiffs permission infringed

    11

  • 8/10/2019 Institutional Investors v. Beecher Carlson - copyright infringement complaint.pdf

    14/18

    Plaintiffs copyrights by engaging in the systematic, regular and repeated unauthorized access to

    the Website's various pages and the copyrighted articles contained therein.

    29. Plaintiff has been irreparably harmed by Defendants' unauthorized reproduction

    of

    their copyrighted works.

    30. In light

    of

    the foregoing, Plaintiff is entitled to the remedies provided for in 17

    U.S.C. 502 etseq

    AS A ND FOR A SECOND

    CAUSE

    OF ACT ION FOR CONTR IBUTORY

    COPYR IGHT INFR INGEMENT

    31. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through

    30 of this Complaint with the same force and effect as

    if

    set forth fully herein.

    32. Individuals using Viccari's personal user identification and password have

    directly infringed the Plaintiffs copyrights on a daily basis by, for example, accessing the

    copyrighted Website material without authorization and creating unauthorized reproductions by

    printing copyrighted articles in violation of Plaintiffs exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C. 106,

    501.

    33. Defendants are liable as contributory infringers for the copyright infringement

    committed via the use of Viccari's subscription information. By sharing this confidential

    information, Defendants have caused, enabled, facilitated, and materially contributed to that

    infringement.

    34. Defendants have actual knowledge

    of

    infringement. Viccari, after purchasing a

    single subscription to the Website in her capacity as a Beecher employee, shared his confidential

    12

  • 8/10/2019 Institutional Investors v. Beecher Carlson - copyright infringement complaint.pdf

    15/18

    information with other Beecher employees unauthorized to receive this information. Viccari also

    printed articles for distribution to other Beecher employees.

    35. Through the conduct described above, Defendants are contributorily liable for the

    infringement described herein.

    36. Defendants' infringementwas willful, intentional, purposeful, and in disregard of

    the rights

    of

    the Plaintiff, and has caused substantial damages to Plaintiff.

    37. Plaintiff is therefore entitled to statutory damages and other remedies provided for

    in 17U.S.C.

    502etseq.

    AS

    AND FOR

    A THIRD

    CAUSE

    OF

    ACTION FOR V ICAR IOUS COPYRIGHT

    INFRINGEMENT

    38. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through

    37

    of

    this Complaint with the same force and effect as

    if

    set forth fully herein.

    39. Unauthorized Beecher employees using the Website have directly infringed on

    Plaintiffs copyright on a regular basis by the above-described conduct in violation of Plaintiffs

    exclusive rights under the Copyright Act.

    40. Defendants are liable as vicarious infringers for the copyright infringement

    committed by the unauthorized use

    of

    Viccari's confidential subscription information. At all

    times relevant to his action, Defendants (i) have had the right and ability to control and/or

    supervise the infringing conduct in sharing the Website logon information, and (ii) have had a

    direct financial interest in, and derived substantial financial benefit from, the infringement of

    Plaintiffs copyrighted articles and other Website materials.

    13

  • 8/10/2019 Institutional Investors v. Beecher Carlson - copyright infringement complaint.pdf

    16/18

    41. Defendants derived direct benefit from the infringement by gaining access to

    information and data that they would otherwise not have had access to. Defendants also avoided

    the business costs associated with purchasing the correct number of subscriptions for employees

    needing access to the Website and its content.

    42. Through the conduct described above, Defendants are vicariously liable for the

    infringement

    of

    Plaintiffs rights.

    43. Plaintiff is therefore entitled to statutory damages and other remedies provided for

    in 17U.S.C.

    502

    etseq

    N D F OR FOURTH C USE OF CTION F O R R E CH OF CONTR CT

    44. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through

    43

    of

    this Complaint with the same force and effect as

    if

    set forth fully herein.

    45. Plaintiff and Defendants entered into a valid and enforceable agreement, under

    which Plainti ff provided single-user Internet access to the Website and a limited license for

    access by a single Beecher user. Plaintifffurther provided a confidential password to Defendants

    and Defendants agreed that access would be limited to one user and not to permit any other

    person or entity to use the password to access the site or to use the password to access the site for

    anyone else.

    46. Defendants breached its agreement with Plaintiff by providing the password to

    multiple persons and permitting those persons to use the password to access the Website for

    purposes substantially in excess of its license.

    14

  • 8/10/2019 Institutional Investors v. Beecher Carlson - copyright infringement complaint.pdf

    17/18

    47. Section 3.5 of the Terms and Conditions for accessing the Website clearly states

    that unauthorized distribution, display, reproduction or other access results in damages

    of

    $1,500

    for each infringing article. Defendants may have infringed scores of articles resulting in

    damages in excess

    of

    $100,000.

    AS

    A ND FOR

    A FIFTH

    CAUSE OF

    ACTION

    FOR

    MISAPPROPRIAT ION OF

    T RADE SECRET S

    48. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through

    47

    of

    this Complaint with the same force and effect as

    if

    set forth fully herein.

    49. Plaintiff licensed a confidential password to Defendants for use only by a single

    user, and that password was an item

    of

    independent economic value used in

    Plaintiffs

    businesses to obtain an advantage over those who did know or use it.

    50. The confidential password's value is derived from not being generally known to,

    and not being readily ascertainable by, other persons who can obtain economic value from

    disclosure or use of the password.

    51. Without authorization from Plaintiff, Defendants misappropriated the password

    and used the password for the benefit of others not permitted to use the password.

    52. Defendants' misappropriation

    of

    Plaintiffs confidential password was willful and

    malicious and caused irreparable damage to Plaintiff.

    WHEREFORE, II demands judgment in its favor and against Defendants, as follows:

    (1) that Defendants and its employees and agents be permanently enjoined from, directly

    or indirectly, infringing in any manner any

    of

    Plaintiffs copyrighted material and from

    15

  • 8/10/2019 Institutional Investors v. Beecher Carlson - copyright infringement complaint.pdf

    18/18

    disclosing confidential passwords to unauthorized persons and entities, and from inducing,

    aiding, causing or materially contributing to such infringement, including the provision

    of

    confidential passwords to unauthorized users, and from violating the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C.

    501

    etseq ;

    (2) that Defendants be required to pay Plaintiff statutory damages for every instance in

    which Plaintiffs copyright was infringed;

    (3) that Defendants be required to pay Plaintifftheir actual damages incurred as the result

    of

    Defendants' infringement

    of

    Plaintiff

    s copyrights;

    (4) that Defendants be required to pay damages (such damages to include lost profits or

    Defendants' profits where appropriate), including without limitation treble damages, punitive

    damages, and exemplary damages, for misappropriation of trade secrets;

    (5) that Defendants be required to pay Pla int iff its direct and consequential damages

    incurred as the result

    of

    Defendants' breach

    of

    its agreement with Plaintiff;

    (6) that Defendants be required to pay liquidated damages in the amount

    of

    $1,500 per

    infringement under the license agreement, in an amount to be determined at trial but believed to

    be in

    excess

    of $100,000;

    (7) that Defendants be required to pay Plaintiff its attorneys' fees and other costs of this

    action; and

    (8) for such other and further reliefas the Court may deem

    just

    and proper.

    Dated:

    New

    York,

    New York

    November 5,2014

    C

    THOMAS

    M.

    LANCIA PLLC

    Attorney for Plaintiff

    INSTITUTIONAL

    t,LLO-7jv^

    Thomas M. Lancia, Esq\

    22 Cort landt S tr ee t

    16th Floor

    New

    York,

    New

    York

    10007

    212.964.3157

    [email protected]

    16