instructional improvement systems
DESCRIPTION
Instructional Improvement Systems. Wednesday, February 13, 2013 Suzan Kinaci, MA Department of Education Marsha Ward, OH Department of Education DeDe Conner, KY Department of Education Joyce Popp, ID Department of Education. Massachusetts. Massachusetts. Initial Proposed Visions - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
26th Annual Management Information Systems [MIS] Conference 1
INSTRUCTIONAL IMPROVEMENT SYSTEMS
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Suzan Kinaci, MA Department of EducationMarsha Ward, OH Department of EducationDeDe Conner, KY Department of Education
Joyce Popp, ID Department of Education
2013 MIS Conference 2
MASSACHUSETTS
2013 MIS Conference 3
Initial Proposed Visions• Massachusetts Teaching and Learning -
RTTTo Curriculum – Model Curriculum Unitso Assessment – Assessment Banko Digital Library
• SIF & P-20 - SLDSEvolution as of Summer 2011 • Edwin
o Edwin Analyticso Edwin Teaching & Learning
MASSACHUSETTS
Stock photo. Release for web use of this photo on file.
2013 MIS Conference 4
Edwin - Analytics (Build)• Student Profiles• Analytic tools, Reporting, Dashboards• EWIS
Edwin Teaching and Learning (Procure)• Joint procurement with Ohio• Comprehensive, integrated, standards-based
single-sign-ono Curriculum Tools – MCUs, Lesson Plans, Curr. Mapso Assessment Tools – Formative, Interim Assessments,
Public & Secure item banks, ability to create/deliver online, paper-based and performance-based assessments
MASSACHUSETTS, CONT.
2013 MIS Conference 5
Edwin Teaching and Learning (cont.)o Assessment Reporting & Dashboardso Digital Resources – high quality, vetted resources available
through federated searches – PBS Learning Media and other publishers
o Career/Vocational Technical Education• Parallel efforts
o IDMo Portalo SLCo LRMI/LRo ETDU
• Timelineo 20% of RTTT ET&L LEAs by end of SY2012-13o 90% by end of grant – Summer 2014
MASSACHUSETTS, CONT.
2013 MIS Conference 6
Areas of Progress• Joint Procurement – requirements through award• Collaboration with other IIS states
o Sharing resourceso Sharing best practices
• Sustainability planning• Marketing
Ongoing Challenges• SIF implementation• Data Quality• Multiple Competing initiatives• Content tagging
MASSACHUSETTS, CONT.
2013 MIS Conference 7
How about that joint procurement?• Why?
o RTTT CIO/IIS meetingso Build or Buy – Buy!o Lead state
– T&Cs– Similar requirements
• How?o Agreed-upon prioritieso Economies of scaleo Shared resourcesWould we do it again?
YES
MASSACHUSETTS AND OHIO
• Benefits?o Credibilityo Broader district inputo Two sets of reviewso Sharing strengths o Requirements validationo Best practices
• Challengeso Different procurement
processeso More schedules to juggleo More consensus to reach
2013 MIS Conference 8
OHIO
2013 MIS Conference 9
Initial IIS Structure and Components:• Online access to electronic curriculum,
resources and tools aligned to the revised standards
• Curriculum customization for differentiated instruction
• Online formative and interim assessments
• Data-analysis capabilities including early-warning indicators for teachers, administrators, parents, and students
OHIO
2013 MIS Conference 10Photo(s) are stock photos.
2013 MIS Conference 11
RttT requirement to have a qualifying IIS• State IIS• Qualifying LEA IIS
State IIS Adoption Rate Based on LEA RttT Scopes of Work• Year 1 – 30%• Year 2 – 38%• Year 3 – 45%
Commitment Letters due in March
OHIO, CONT.
2013 MIS Conference 12
Thinkgate Implementation Timeline
Core UAT• February/March 2013
Ohio Pilot• April/May 2013
RttT LEA Rollout• Completed by March 2014
Non-RttT LEA Rollout
OHIO, CONT.
Photo(s) are stock photos.
2013 MIS Conference 13
KENTUCKY
2013 MIS Conference 14
Scope of IMS defined by:• Senate Bill 1 (2009) laid out an aggressive plan
to transform education in Kentucky – Unbridled Learningo new, more rigorous standardso new assessmentso assessment literacy for educatorso a new accountability system
• Designed with the following goals in mind:o Better prepare students for life after high school and
to compete globallyo College/career-readiness for ALL
KENTUCKY
2013 MIS Conference
large images
15
Continuous ImprovementPhoto(s) are stock photos.
2013 MIS Conference 16
IMS Data:• Utilize statewide SIS/LDS to populate- data
refreshed weeklyo Student-level data includes – demographics, programs,
courses, grades and assessments.o Teacher-level data includes – teacher demographics,
classroom rosters• Materials Available – Pearson, State-created,
District/School-created, PD360 & Common Core 360, Model Curriculum framework, Hippo Campus, KET Encyclopedia; Kentucky Learning Depot, KY Virtual Library, Partnership for 21st Century Skills, SAS, Thinkfinity, Kentucky iTunes U.
• Standards – English/Language Arts & Mathematics
KENTUCKY, CONT.
2013 MIS Conference 17
Common Core Standards Use:• Kentucky academic standards and aligned
instructional resources available.• Classroom standards mastery and item analysis
reports help guide instruction
KENTUCKY, CONT.
Includes a drag-and-drop lesson planner with the characteristics of highly effective teaching and learning
Stock photo. Release for web use of this photo on file.
2013 MIS Conference 18
Assess Admin Module
KENTUCKY, CONT.
• Includes a test item bank with more than 11,000 questions aligned to E/LA and mathematics standards
• Create express tests or design a test using your own questions
• Supports assessment FOR learning
VIDEO LINK
Stock photo. Release for web use of this photo on file.
2013 MIS Conference 19
Rollout• Pilot districts Spring 2011; full rollout to all
174 districts November 2011.o Webinar training – for teachers/administratorso Face-to-Face – for train the trainer o On-demand trainingo Summer 2012 – Capacity Building Training
Regionally through Co-ops
KENTUCKY, CONT.
2013 MIS Conference 20
Lessons Learned• Communication is key
o Information isn’t always sharedo Peer pressure works. Share successes.
• Monitor and report on use• Use drives data quality
o Data being used in a different way can bring issues to light.
• Help Desk(s) play critical roleo Training resource
• Boots on the ground – “gather intelligence”
KENTUCKY
2013 MIS Conference 21
IDAHO
2013 MIS Conference 22
Define Ultimate Goal – Foundational • Tools to improve student achievement
o Ease of use– Relevant data to the classroom– Excellent resources for teachers and administrators– Classroom assessment – formative data
Assessment – Standards – Curriculum• Assessments to show progress on constant
and predictive level. o Individualized instruction based on standards
masteryo Lesson plans design
– Expedient feedback on student’s progress and understanding » Specific Concepts and Theories
IDAHO
2013 MIS Conference 23
Digital Content • Standards aligned videos • 24 X 7 Learning environment for students
and teacherso Flipped classroom o Student Engagement
State approved item repository• Ease of creation for relevant assessments
o Items aligned to common core standards• District Management of Assessments
o End of Course o Benchmark
IDAHO, CONT.
Stock photo.
2013 MIS Conference
USING STATEWIDE LONGITUDINAL DATA
• School Calendar• Student Demographics• Student Course Enrollment• Student Daily Attendance• Staff Demographics• Staff Assignments• Teacher Attendance• Special Ed Details• Gifted Student Details• Student Test Results• Student Discipline Tracking
SLDS File SetTransmit Data
from District to State
Data Quality Checked
ISDEStudents
Come First System(CORE)
SchoolNet (IIS) Portal
2013 MIS Conference
INSTRUCTIONAL IMPROVEMENT SYSTEM VIEWS
25
25
Administrators
Students
Teachers
Stock photo. Release for web use of this photo on file.
2013 MIS Conference 26
small images
Mastery reporting, differentiation, and item analysis
Stock photo. Release for web use of this photo on file. Fictitious names.
2013 MIS Conference
Contact information:Suzan Kinaci, [email protected] Marsha Ward, [email protected] Dede Conner, [email protected] Joyce Popp, [email protected] Corey Chatis, [email protected]
CONTACTS & ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
27