instrumental color measurement for process control · global paint & polymers center g p p c...

26
G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center Instrumental Color Measurement for Process Control Lisa L. Shaw GM Global Paint & Polymers April 2011

Upload: donga

Post on 13-Oct-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

Instrumental Color Measurement for Process Control

Lisa L. Shaw GM Global Paint & Polymers

April 2011

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

Perceptual Quality

Improve Surface

Structure (Orange

Peel)

Improve Color

Harmony

Improve Secondary

Surface Appearance

Improve Exposed Sealer

Appearance

Evaluate Color

Palette

“Best in Segment” Strategy: Quality Pillars

Pillar

Strategic Tasks

Init

ial Q

ual

ity

One ME Global MEPaint and Polymers “Best in Segment”

Pe

rce

ptu

al Q

ual

ity

Lon

g Te

rm Q

ual

ity

Po

lym

ers

an

d

Ad

d-O

n P

arts

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

Foundation for Process Control

Need for Objective Assessment that can be Conducted in Paint Shop Lighting

One Fascia Supplier Supplies Multiple Plants

Why Instrumental Color Measurement?

Assembly Plant 1

BC/CC System Supplier A

WBBC/2KCC

Assembly Plant 2

BC/CC System Supplier B

WBBC/2KCC

Assembly Plant 3

BC/CC System Supplier B

WBBC/1KCC

Fascia Supplier 1 BC/CC System

Supplier A SBBC/2KCC

BC/CC System Supplier B

WBBC/2KCC

Fascia Supplier 2

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

Objective Instrumental Measurement: Color Harmony

Gage R&R Validated

Multi-Angle Color Measurement

Metallic Impact Characterized by Sparkle and Graininess

Objective Data for Match to Standard or Adjacent Panel Harmony

Obtain color harmony using tool for process control.

Multi-angle Color Measurement

Sparkle and Graininess Evaluation

Chromatic:

2*

2*

2*

2'

+

+

=

gggg

g

HHCCL

L Sg

DH

Sg

DC

gSg

DLDE

g

+-+=

+-=

+=

ggg

g

gg

2120.014.07.0;7.0max

4235048070max

5.3115.0

LCS

L g.C g.;.S

LS

g

g

g

H

C

L

2

*

2

*

2

*2'

+

+

=

gggg

gbbaaLL Sg

Db

Sg

Da

Sg

DLDE

Non-chromatic:

=

=

+=

7.0

7.0

5.3115.0

g

b

a

L

S

S

LSg

g

gg

Chromatic: C* 18 or C* 10 and L* 27

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

Color Risk: Likelihood of a Color to Change Sparkle, Grain, or Hue Due to Viewing Angle

Volt Color Code Risk Capability

Black 41 / GBA Low

Crystal Claret Tintcoat 89 / GBE Medium

Switchblade Silver Metallic 17 / GAN Medium

Urban Fresh Tricoat 16 / GLC High

White Diamond Tricoat 98 / GBN High

Cyber Gray Metallic 57 GBV High

COLOR PALETTE

PRODUCT DESIGN

COLOR HARMONY

APPLICATION METHOD + + =

LOW: Non-Metallic or Dark Metallic Color with Minimal Travel & No Hue Shift

MEDIUM: Light to Medium Metallic Color with Travel and No Hue Shift

HIGH: Light to Medium Metallic Color with High Travel and Hue Shift

Poor Color

Harmony

Example

Fascia Cut-Line Color Category

Low Medium High

DES

IGN

All Vertical 90 Green Yellow Red

Short Verticals & “Z” Joints

Green Yellow Red

Horizontal Green Green Yellow

Horizontal with Break

Green Green Green

Design = ( Cut Line Gap Character Angle Interface )

Design = ( Cut Line Gap Character Angle Interface )

Angle Interface

Color Category

Low Medium High

DES

IGN

< 4 Angle Green Yellow Red

> 4 Angle Green Red Red

COLOR PALETTE

PRODUCT DESIGN

COLOR HARMONY

APPLICATION METHOD + + =

Service Bulletin: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro Information on Door and Quarter Panel Paint Appearance Background

Paint on Doors May Appear as a Different Shade than Quarter Panels Varies based on Viewing Angle and Light Conditions More Apparent with Certain Colors

Design Intent Door to Quarter Panel Angle Match is the Design Intent Wildfire Metallic (High Harmony Risk Color) Panels Demonstrate Impact of

Angle on Apparent Color

STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD

Flat Panel with Standard Indicating Color Consistency

Panel with Crease on Right Side Creates an Angle Similar to the Camaro Door-Quarter Interface

Standard Repositioned to the Right Side of the Panel Shifts Along with the Angled Side

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

Instrumental Color Process Control 3 Segments

1. Batch 2. Painted Body 3. Color Harmony

1st Degree of control. Reduce batch to batch variation to minimize

color impact.

In paint shop control – daily measurement to

identify processing variations and maintain

consistency.

Measurement of assembled product for match point data and

visual correlation.

BykMac Output Component to

Component (Body to Fascia) Batch & Component to

Standard

Total Color Difference dSE

dSt Effect

Sparkle Graininess

25, 45, 75 -15, 15, 25, 45, 75, 110

dEt Color Difference

Angle Independent

Diffuse Light Bright Light DL

Da

Db

DL

DC

Dh

Light to Dark

Chroma (Saturation)

Hue

Sa Sparkle Area

Si Sparkle Intensity

High Sparkle

Low Sparkle

High Graininess

Low Graininess

G Graininess (Fine vs. Grainy Pattern)

+ - + - + -

Supports Benchmarking & Monthly Color Harmony

Reviews

Supports Paint Shop and Paint Supplier Process Control

Measurement of Color: Color Systems for Automotive Exterior Applications

DIN 6175-2 System

DE DIN Scales

Developed by European OEM’s

Based on Metallics

Good DE DIN Visual Correlation

Weighting Factors

- Angle (g)

- Application (g)

- Color (S)

Chromatic:

2*

2*

2*

2'

+

+

=

gggg

g

HHCCL

L Sg

DH

Sg

DC

gSg

DLDE

g

+-+=

+-=

+=

ggg

g

gg

2120.014.07.0;7.0max

4235048070max

5.3115.0

LCS

L g.C g.;.S

LS

g

g

g

H

C

L

2

*

2

*

2

*2'

+

+

=

gggg

gbbaaLL Sg

Db

Sg

Da

Sg

DLDE

Non-chromatic:

=

=

+=

7.0

7.0

5.3115.0

g

b

a

L

S

S

LSg

g

gg

Chromatic: C* 18 or C* 10 and L* 27

1.7

1

gDa

gDb

DIN 6175-2 System Allows Use of Red Yellow Green

Zones with a Single Tolerance

DEp 1.7 STOP1.0 < D Ep ≤ 1.7 Evaluate

D Ep ≤ 1.0 GO

Application Factors: gL ga gb gC gHNormalized Tolerance

Paint Batch Application 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 DEC = 1.0

Paint Line Body 2.0 1.2 1.2 1.8 1.2 DEP = 1.0

Repair Line 2.0 1.2 1.2 1.8 1.2 DEP = 1.5

Repair Line with Gap 2.0 1.2 1.2 1.8 1.2 DEP = 3.0

DEp

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

Process Control Time Allocation

Data Collection Batch

Painted Bodies

Full Vehicles

Data Analysis Trend Charting

Individual vehicle tracking

Scorecards

25%

75%

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

Data Analysis

Objective: • Use process control charts to track changes and

drive continuous improvement • Not a Go/No Go Method.

Method • Track Total Color, dE, Total Effect, dL, da, db

averages over time. • Look at individual vehicle data for visual

correlation.

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

Data Analysis

Use Data to Excel to extract useful data for charting.

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

What Has Worked Well

Measurement for Process Control

Trend charting using Excel

Ease of use for operators – software and equipment

Repeatability of measurements

Visual correlation on many colors

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

Success Story

Detected a special-cause variation in batch. Re-routed vehicles to prevent passing issue into production process.

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

Opportunities for Improvement

Visual correlation for interference pigments and tri-coats.

Difficulty correlating same colors between plants based on technology and formulation.

Charting capabilities in software.

Speed of software for download and data analysis.

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

Visually acceptable to standard.

Visually acceptable to standard.

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

Understanding DIN6175

Internal tolerances may not suit 100% of colors • “False Feel Good” - Solids

• “False Reaction Required” – some interference pigments

Partner with suppliers to identify “trouble” colors for DIN6175.

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

Partnering with Suppliers

Add-on part suppliers, paint suppliers.

Integrate common equipment and capabilities across supply base.

Data-sharing partnership to improve color harmony.

Variation reduction and process control.

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

Partnering with Suppliers

dE15 dE25 dE45 dE75 dE110

dE

dE Angle

Plant A and Supplier B dE Overlap and Min/Max Zones

Overlap Min

Max

Min

Overlap Max

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

dL*15 dL*25 dL*45 dL*75 dL*110

dL*

dL Angle

Plant A and Supplier B dL* Overlap and Min/Max Zones

Overlap Min

Max

Min

Overlap Max

da*15 da*25 da*45 da*75 da*110

da*

da Angle

Plant A and Supplier B da* Overlap and Min/Max Zones

Overlap Min

Max

Min

Overlap Max

db*15 db*25 db*45 db*75 db*110

db

*

db Angle

Plant A and Supplier B db* Overlap and Min/Max Zones

Overlap Min

Max

Min

Overlap Max

G P P C Global Paint & Polymers Center

Work with suppliers to further understand DIN 6175

Continue to improve visual correlation for interference and tri-coat paints.

Integrate color process control across supply base

Include color measurement from beginning stages of color development

Color Measurement: Future Opportunities