insurance tax update sara hendrix tax senior director grand rapids, mi mackenzie satkoski tax...

25
Insurance Tax Update Sara Hendrix Tax Senior Director Grand Rapids, MI Mackenzie Satkoski Tax Manager Grand Rapids, MI April 22, 2015

Upload: claire-banks

Post on 16-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Insurance Tax Update

Sara HendrixTax Senior DirectorGrand Rapids, MI

Mackenzie SatkoskiTax ManagerGrand Rapids, MI

April 22, 2015

Agenda• Tax Technical Update

• ACA Provisions 162(m)(6) Compensation Deduction Limitation Health Insurer Fee – Form 8963

• New and Proposed Provisions Tangible Property Regulations Obama FY16 Budget Provisions specific to Insurance

• Questions

Page 2

Tax Technical Update

Recent Court Cases

• Acuity Mutual Insurance Co. v. Commissioner, TC Memo 2013-209 Tax Court ruled in favor of taxpayer Acuity supplied substantial evidence to support position and

IRS did not Again, looked to NAIC approved annual statement for starting

point

Page 4

Recent Court Cases

• Acuity Mutual Insurance Co. v. Commissioner, TC Memo 2013-209 Take-away: Memorandum decision but reinforces the court’s

reliance on documentation to support position that loss reserves are ‘fair and reasonable’ and makes it more difficult for the IRS to argue otherwise

Page 5

Recent Court Cases

• State Farm v. Commissioner, No. 11–3478 Seventh Circuit in US Court of Appeals did not allow bad-faith

damage award that was punitive as part of loss reserves Portion of award related to compensatory was included in loss

reserves Court largely followed the NAIC guidance

Page 6

Recent Court Cases

• New York Life v. United States, No. 11–2394 Second Circuit Court affirmed district court decision that

deductions for policyholder dividends did not satisfy the “all-events” test under IRC 461

New York Life deducted two types of dividends• Annual dividend mandated by state law; credited but not paid

until PH anniversary date• Voluntary termination dividend accrued but no paid until death,

maturity, or surrender

Page 7

Recent Court Cases

• Mass Mutual Life v. United States, No. 07-648T U.S. Court of Claims; nearly identical facts as NY Life Court applied standard of deductibility that requires absolute

liability rather than absolute discharge through payment• Court viewed Board approval of guaranteed dividend prior to year

end as an established liability, deductible in the year of adoption and resolution

• Court held that PH dividends qualified as recurring and satisfied the “all-events” test

Takeaway

Page 8

Section 162(m)(6)Compensation Deduction Limitation

IRC Section 162(m)(6)• Enacted as part of the Affordable Healthcare Act in

2010.

• Final IRS regulations were issued in September 2014.

• Provides for a $500,000 limit on compensation deductions for tax year beginning on or after January 1, 2013 for “Covered Health Insurance Providers” (CHIPs).

• Deduction limitation applies to both current and deferred compensation arrangements paid or vested in 2013 or later (discussed later in more detail).

Page 10

IRC Section 162(m)(6)• Section 162(m)(c)(6) defines a CHIP as any employer

that is a “health insurance issuer” as defined under IRC Section 9832(b)(2) who receives at least 25% of gross premiums from providing health insurance coverage defined as “minimum essential coverage.”

• A “health insurance issuer” is defined as an insurance company, service or organization (including HMO) that is licensed to engage in the business of insurance in a state and subject to state law which regulates insurance.

Page 11

IRC Section 162(m)(6)• Deferred Compensation:

162(m)(6) limitation applies to deferred compensation attributable to services performed in a taxable year beginning after December 31, 2009 that is otherwise deductible in a taxable year beginning after December 31, 2012

Any unused $500,000 limitation on deferred compensation maybe carried forward to the taxable year in which such compensation is otherwise deductible

Page 12

IRC Section 162(m)(6)• De Minimis Exception:

A health insurance issuer and any member of its aggregated group are not considered to be CHIPs if the premiums received by the health insurance issuer(s) in the group are less than 2% of the total gross revenue of the aggregated group

Subsequent year transition period for de minimis exception

• Aggregate Group Rules Final regulations example

Page 13

Health Insurance Provider Fee – Form 8963

Health Insurance Provider Fee

• Enacted as part of the Affordable Healthcare Act in 2010.

• Known as the “Insurer Fee”, this fee is applies to health insurance issuers.

• Beginning in 2014, health insurance issuers will pay an annual fee based on their net written premiums.

• Similar definitions and exclusions apply to this fee as is applied to the 162(m)(6) provisions

• Fee is non-deductible for income tax purposes

• Fee is being used to fund premium tax subsidies for low-income taxpayers from purchased coverage via health exchange

Page 15

Health Insurance Provider Fee• The criteria for the fee is as follows:

Less than $25M premiums – not subject to fee Between $25M and $50M premiums – 50% of premiums subject

to fee Over $50M in premiums – 100% subject to fee

• Different rates apply to tax-exempt insurers

• Government will issue the revenue needed to be raised by these fees on an annual basis. 2015 revenue = $11.3 Billion

• Insurers report annual net written premiums to the IRS via Form 8963. Due to IRS by April 15 each year.

• Amount of fee will be determined and notified by August 31, payment due September 30 each year

Page 16

New and Proposed Tax Legislation – Insurance Industry

New Tax Laws

• Tangible Property Regulations Final regulations issued September 2013

Effective January 1, 2014• Early adopt for 2012 and 2013

Goal was to simplify and provide more guidance

Page 18

New Tax Laws

• Tangible Property Regulations – Main Focus Materials and Supplies (1.162-3) Repairs and Maintenance (1.162-4) Capital Expenditures (1.263(a)-1) Amounts paid for the acquisition or production of

tangible property (1.263(a)-2) Amounts paid for the improvement of tangible

property (1.263(a)-3)

Page 19

New Tax Laws

• Tangible Property Regulations – De Minimis Capitalization Safe harbor at the invoice or item level $5,000 per invoice or item, if applicable financial

statement $500 per invoice or item, if no applicable financial

statement

Page 20

New Tax Laws

• Tangible Property Regulations – Transition IRS expects that nearly all companies will have a

change in their accounting method Transition guidance was issued in early 2014 in

Revenue Procedure 2014-16 and 2014-17 How to apply the regulations for years prior to

2014 Change of accounting procedures

Page 21

Proposed Tax Laws• Obama FY 2016 Budget – many provisions repeated

from FY15 Budget Top corporate tax rate 28% Provision to limit deductions for reinsurance paid

by a US insurance company to its foreign affiliates• Denial of deduction for reinsurance premiums paid to the

extent the foreign reinsurer is not subject to U.S. income tax with respect to premiums received.

Imposition of “Financial Crisis Responsibility Fee” on financial entities, including insurance companies, with worldwide consolidated assets in excess of $50 billion. • Fee based on covered liabilities

Page 22

Proposed Tax Laws

• Camp Tax Reform Discussion Draft Similar corporate rate reduction from Obama proposal – 25-

28% Involves “base broadening” to provide revenue neutral

impact on rate reduction Several provisions specific to life insurance industry include

substantial increase to Tax DAC capitalization rates, lower tax reserve discount rates, further reduction of DRD, changes in carryback provisions to mirror non-life companies

Page 23

Questions?

Questions & AnswersFor additional questions please contact:

Sara HendrixTax Senior [email protected](616) 802-3482

Mackenzie SatkoskiTax [email protected] (616) 802-3380

Page 25