insurancerescissionpowerpoint
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
1/32
Health Insurance
RescissionStrategies for Navigating, Shaping and Succeeding within Federal and StateLegislation and Regulation
, LLCApril 2011
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
2/32
Rescission Overview
In the health insurance context, a termination of a policydue to a misrepresentation by the policyholder on theapplication
Premiums returned to the insured, but insurer does not haveto pay for often expensive treatment
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
3/32
How Rescission Benefits
InsurersIndividual applies for health
insurance and theapplication is approved by
the Insurer
Insured Individual receivesmedical treatment
Treatment Provider files aclaim with the insurer for
reimbursement
Insurer underwrites thepolicy, check for
discrepancies between theinsureds medical record
and application
If a discrepancy is found,the insurer rescinds the
policy and does not pay theprovider
Unable to collect from theinsurer, the provider bills
the individual
The Individual must pay for the treatments received out-
of-pocket or file for bankruptcy
If the Individual files for bankruptcy, the hospital
will be unable to collect for services rendered
In either case, the insurer will be able to avoid a
payment, or to bereimbursed for paymentsmade under a rescinded
policy
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
4/32
The Insurers Perspective
Rescission is a necessary tool in combating fraudulent or inaccurate applications
Underwriting post-claim allows applications to be processedfaster and keeps overall system costs to a minimum
Controls and oversight are already in place, as well as judicial review, to prevent abuses
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
5/32
Criticism of Rescissions
Can lead to seemingly unfair results:Coverage pulled shortly before an operationCoverage rescinded due to relatively minor/immaterial discrepanciesLack of oversightJudicial process can be unavailing due to time and cost
Allows the insurer to keep the benefit of premiums(including those based on inaccurate applications) andselectively choose which policies to rescind
Method has been termed cherry picking
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
6/32
Rescissions by the Numbers
Source: 2009 Rescission Data Call, National Association of Insurance Commissioners
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
7/32
Rescissions by the Numbers, 2
Source: 2009 Rescission Data Call, National Association of Insurance Commissioners
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
8/32
Rescissions by the Numbers, 3
While rescission may not be numerous, they are costeffective
The19,776 rescission reported to Congress saved insurers atleast $300,000,000
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
9/32
Congressional Investigation
Found several controversial practices where coverage wasrescinded:Even though mistakes on the application were unintentional or caused by othersFor conditions the policyholder did not know about
For a condition unrelated to the one for which the patient wasseeking careFor family members who were not involved inmisrepresentations
House Committee on Energy and CommerceMemorandum and Hearings
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
10/32
Congressional Investigation, 2
Certain conditions or dollar amounts trigger automaticinvestigations of a claimants medical history
At least one company, WellPoint, based employeeperformance evaluations on the amount an employee savedthe company through rescinding policies
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
11/32
Congressional Investigation, 3
Number of Rescissions may be higher than previouslythoughtWellPoint, UnitedHealth and Assurant Health Aloneaccounted for at least 19,776 between 2003 and 2007These three companies saved more than $300 million as a
result of these rescissions during that timeAt a June 19, 2009 hearing, officers at each of the threecompanies refused to promise the committee that they wouldlimit rescissions to cases where the insured had made afraudulent or material misrepresentation
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
12/32
Before PPACA: A Disparate
Regulatory Framework
HIPAA already provided that [A] health insurer [providingcoverage] to an individual shall renew or continue in forcesuch coverage at the option of the individual
Exception, however, if the insured committed fraud or anintentional misrepresentation of material fact
Majority of states, however, do not require a showing of fraud or intent
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
13/32
Federal Government Response
PPACA 2712. PROHIBITION ON RESCISSIONS.
A group health plan and a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall not rescind such plan or coverage with respect to an enrollee once the enrollee is coveredunder such plan or coverage involved, except that this section shallnot apply to a covered individual who has performed an act or
practice that constitutes fraud or makes an intentionalmisrepresentation of material fact as prohibited by the terms of theplan or coverage. Such plan or coverage may not be cancelled exceptwith prior notice to the enrollee, and only as permitted under section2702(c) or 2742(b).
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
14/32
Interim Final Rules
Issuers cannot rescind coverage unless an individual was involved in fraud or made an intentional misrepresentation of material fact.
Defines rescission as a cancellation or discontinuation that has retroactiveeffect
Applies to individual and group plans, as well as grandfathered plans
30 days notice must be given beforehandMust be a written notice and given to all individual affected by the rescission
Provides a federal floor that allows states to impose greater restrictions onrescissions
Departments of HHS, Treasury, & Labor 26 CFR 54.9815-2712T
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
15/32
Pure Administrative Law Issues
Interim Final means Final, i.e. Enforceable.
No notice and comment before the adoption of the regulationsException under APA 553 The Secretaries have determinedthat it would be impracticable and contrary to the public interestto delay putting the provisions in these interim final regulations in
placeSpecific authority granted by section 9833 of the Code, section734 of ERISA, and section 2792 of the PHS Act
Source: IRS Bulletin T.D. 9489
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
16/32
Comments on the Regulations
Terms such as material need a clearer definitionMore examples are necessary
Potentially strict/impracticable reporting requirements for employers
Potential inconsistency with COBRA reportingrequirements
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
17/32
Other Admin Issues
Sen. Orin Hatchs letter to Sec. SebeliusConstitutionality of the Act/ Authority of the Depts toissue the regulations
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
18/32
Recommendations to the Board
Focus efforts on state levelEfforts at federal level may not have much tractionStates have started crafting more stringent requirementsAdvocacy at the state level has met some successStates will be relied on heavily to enforce regulations
Perform a more complete pre-issuance underwritingCreate an application with specific questions about each individualpreexisting condition in laymens terms.Contact applicant for specific information when an response on the formis unclear The easier the application is to understand and the more through theunderwriting, the more likely a court will find a misrepresentation or omission to be fraudulent
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
19/32
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
20/32
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
21/32
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
22/32
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
23/32
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
24/32
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
25/32
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
26/32
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
27/32
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
28/32
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
29/32
Recommendations, 2
Most major health insurers have already complied to themajor provisions of the rescission regulations even beforethe regulations effective date
Courts have sustained the enforceability of rulespromulgated without notice and comment
Continued opposition has the potential for negativepublicity
However opposition to PPACA public option provision
Limited Efforts at the Federal Level
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
30/32
Recommendations, 3
States can and have crafted requirements that are moredifficult on insurers
Advocacy and lobbying in state legislatures- focus on accessand costs
Challenges to state regulations have had some successCA holding that the DOI lacked authority to implementcertain restrictions on insurers
Efforts at the State Level
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
31/32
Conclusion
Barring the repeal of PPACA, compliance with theprohibition on rescissions established by 2712 will beunavoidable
Until 2014, a through pre-issuance underwriting systemshould be in place to prevent fraudulent claims
Lobbying on the state-level to keep state laws identical to 2712 will keep the financial burden on insurers to aminimum
-
8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint
32/32
Q uestions?