insurancerescissionpowerpoint

Upload: bigfatbudda

Post on 08-Apr-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    1/32

    Health Insurance

    RescissionStrategies for Navigating, Shaping and Succeeding within Federal and StateLegislation and Regulation

    , LLCApril 2011

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    2/32

    Rescission Overview

    In the health insurance context, a termination of a policydue to a misrepresentation by the policyholder on theapplication

    Premiums returned to the insured, but insurer does not haveto pay for often expensive treatment

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    3/32

    How Rescission Benefits

    InsurersIndividual applies for health

    insurance and theapplication is approved by

    the Insurer

    Insured Individual receivesmedical treatment

    Treatment Provider files aclaim with the insurer for

    reimbursement

    Insurer underwrites thepolicy, check for

    discrepancies between theinsureds medical record

    and application

    If a discrepancy is found,the insurer rescinds the

    policy and does not pay theprovider

    Unable to collect from theinsurer, the provider bills

    the individual

    The Individual must pay for the treatments received out-

    of-pocket or file for bankruptcy

    If the Individual files for bankruptcy, the hospital

    will be unable to collect for services rendered

    In either case, the insurer will be able to avoid a

    payment, or to bereimbursed for paymentsmade under a rescinded

    policy

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    4/32

    The Insurers Perspective

    Rescission is a necessary tool in combating fraudulent or inaccurate applications

    Underwriting post-claim allows applications to be processedfaster and keeps overall system costs to a minimum

    Controls and oversight are already in place, as well as judicial review, to prevent abuses

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    5/32

    Criticism of Rescissions

    Can lead to seemingly unfair results:Coverage pulled shortly before an operationCoverage rescinded due to relatively minor/immaterial discrepanciesLack of oversightJudicial process can be unavailing due to time and cost

    Allows the insurer to keep the benefit of premiums(including those based on inaccurate applications) andselectively choose which policies to rescind

    Method has been termed cherry picking

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    6/32

    Rescissions by the Numbers

    Source: 2009 Rescission Data Call, National Association of Insurance Commissioners

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    7/32

    Rescissions by the Numbers, 2

    Source: 2009 Rescission Data Call, National Association of Insurance Commissioners

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    8/32

    Rescissions by the Numbers, 3

    While rescission may not be numerous, they are costeffective

    The19,776 rescission reported to Congress saved insurers atleast $300,000,000

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    9/32

    Congressional Investigation

    Found several controversial practices where coverage wasrescinded:Even though mistakes on the application were unintentional or caused by othersFor conditions the policyholder did not know about

    For a condition unrelated to the one for which the patient wasseeking careFor family members who were not involved inmisrepresentations

    House Committee on Energy and CommerceMemorandum and Hearings

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    10/32

    Congressional Investigation, 2

    Certain conditions or dollar amounts trigger automaticinvestigations of a claimants medical history

    At least one company, WellPoint, based employeeperformance evaluations on the amount an employee savedthe company through rescinding policies

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    11/32

    Congressional Investigation, 3

    Number of Rescissions may be higher than previouslythoughtWellPoint, UnitedHealth and Assurant Health Aloneaccounted for at least 19,776 between 2003 and 2007These three companies saved more than $300 million as a

    result of these rescissions during that timeAt a June 19, 2009 hearing, officers at each of the threecompanies refused to promise the committee that they wouldlimit rescissions to cases where the insured had made afraudulent or material misrepresentation

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    12/32

    Before PPACA: A Disparate

    Regulatory Framework

    HIPAA already provided that [A] health insurer [providingcoverage] to an individual shall renew or continue in forcesuch coverage at the option of the individual

    Exception, however, if the insured committed fraud or anintentional misrepresentation of material fact

    Majority of states, however, do not require a showing of fraud or intent

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    13/32

    Federal Government Response

    PPACA 2712. PROHIBITION ON RESCISSIONS.

    A group health plan and a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall not rescind such plan or coverage with respect to an enrollee once the enrollee is coveredunder such plan or coverage involved, except that this section shallnot apply to a covered individual who has performed an act or

    practice that constitutes fraud or makes an intentionalmisrepresentation of material fact as prohibited by the terms of theplan or coverage. Such plan or coverage may not be cancelled exceptwith prior notice to the enrollee, and only as permitted under section2702(c) or 2742(b).

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    14/32

    Interim Final Rules

    Issuers cannot rescind coverage unless an individual was involved in fraud or made an intentional misrepresentation of material fact.

    Defines rescission as a cancellation or discontinuation that has retroactiveeffect

    Applies to individual and group plans, as well as grandfathered plans

    30 days notice must be given beforehandMust be a written notice and given to all individual affected by the rescission

    Provides a federal floor that allows states to impose greater restrictions onrescissions

    Departments of HHS, Treasury, & Labor 26 CFR 54.9815-2712T

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    15/32

    Pure Administrative Law Issues

    Interim Final means Final, i.e. Enforceable.

    No notice and comment before the adoption of the regulationsException under APA 553 The Secretaries have determinedthat it would be impracticable and contrary to the public interestto delay putting the provisions in these interim final regulations in

    placeSpecific authority granted by section 9833 of the Code, section734 of ERISA, and section 2792 of the PHS Act

    Source: IRS Bulletin T.D. 9489

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    16/32

    Comments on the Regulations

    Terms such as material need a clearer definitionMore examples are necessary

    Potentially strict/impracticable reporting requirements for employers

    Potential inconsistency with COBRA reportingrequirements

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    17/32

    Other Admin Issues

    Sen. Orin Hatchs letter to Sec. SebeliusConstitutionality of the Act/ Authority of the Depts toissue the regulations

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    18/32

    Recommendations to the Board

    Focus efforts on state levelEfforts at federal level may not have much tractionStates have started crafting more stringent requirementsAdvocacy at the state level has met some successStates will be relied on heavily to enforce regulations

    Perform a more complete pre-issuance underwritingCreate an application with specific questions about each individualpreexisting condition in laymens terms.Contact applicant for specific information when an response on the formis unclear The easier the application is to understand and the more through theunderwriting, the more likely a court will find a misrepresentation or omission to be fraudulent

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    19/32

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    20/32

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    21/32

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    22/32

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    23/32

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    24/32

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    25/32

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    26/32

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    27/32

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    28/32

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    29/32

    Recommendations, 2

    Most major health insurers have already complied to themajor provisions of the rescission regulations even beforethe regulations effective date

    Courts have sustained the enforceability of rulespromulgated without notice and comment

    Continued opposition has the potential for negativepublicity

    However opposition to PPACA public option provision

    Limited Efforts at the Federal Level

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    30/32

    Recommendations, 3

    States can and have crafted requirements that are moredifficult on insurers

    Advocacy and lobbying in state legislatures- focus on accessand costs

    Challenges to state regulations have had some successCA holding that the DOI lacked authority to implementcertain restrictions on insurers

    Efforts at the State Level

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    31/32

    Conclusion

    Barring the repeal of PPACA, compliance with theprohibition on rescissions established by 2712 will beunavoidable

    Until 2014, a through pre-issuance underwriting systemshould be in place to prevent fraudulent claims

    Lobbying on the state-level to keep state laws identical to 2712 will keep the financial burden on insurers to aminimum

  • 8/7/2019 InsuranceRescissionPowerpoint

    32/32

    Q uestions?