integrated assessment of energy related so 2 emissions control in china’s 12 th five-year ...
DESCRIPTION
National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan. 32ND USAEE/IAEE NORTH AMERICAN CONFERENCE JULY 28-31 · ANCHORAGE AK, USA . Integrated Assessment of Energy Related SO 2 Emissions Control in China’s 12 th Five-Year Plan. Xuanming Su, Kiyoshi Takahashi, Weisheng Zhou - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Integrated Assessment of Energy Related SO2 Emissions Control
in China’s 12th Five-Year Plan
Xuanming Su, Kiyoshi Takahashi, Weisheng ZhouJuly 30, 2013
National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan
1
32ND USAEE/IAEE NORTH AMERICAN CONFERENCEJULY 28-31 · ANCHORAGE AK, USA
1. Introduction
2. Methodologies
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
References
2
Content
China’s five-year plans are a series of social and economic development initiatives.
SO2 reduction targets and results in the previous five-year plans.
Source: NBS & MEP, China statistical yearbook on environment (2000-2012)
3
1. Introduction
10th (2001-2005) 11th (2006-2010)
SO2 reduction targets 10% below 2000 levels 10% below 2005 levels
SO2 reduction results 27.8% above 2000 levels 14.3% below 2005 levelsIndustrial emissions meeting discharge standards 79.4% 97.9%Industrial desulfurization rate 33.5% 66.0%
SO2 emissions of China (1992-2010)Source: NBS, China statistical yearbook (1990-2012), NBS & MEP, China statistical yearbook on environment (1998-2012)
4
1.1 SO2 emissions of China
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
SO₂ e
mis
sion
s(M
t)
Industrial SO₂ removed Household SO₂ emissions Industrial SO₂ emissions
↑27.8% ↓14.3%
66.0%
33.5%
Industrial desulfurization rate
SO2 emissions and desulfurization rates by provinces of China in 2010Source: NBS, China statistical yearbook (2011)
5
1.2 SO2 emissions by provinces in 2010
69.6%
63.2%
63.2%62.9%
57.3%60.1%
40.3%
20.9%
61.2%
68.3%
66.5%
76.9%
50.9%
77.6%
69.5%
55.2%
67.9%
61.5%59.5%
53.7%
75.7%
62.7%
48.1%
77.2%77.1%
0.0%
60.4%
79.3%
17.3%
65.4%
25.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0
1
2
3
4
5
SO₂ e
mis
sion
s and
rem
oved
(Mt)
SO₂ emissions removed (left) SO₂ emissions (left) Desulfurization rate (right) Mean desulfurization rate (right)
66%
Above mean desulfurization rate
SO2 emissions by sectors of China in 2010Source: NBS, China statistical yearbook (2011) 6
1.3 SO2 emissions by sectors in 2010Mining & Quarrying
2.0%Food, Beverage &
Tobacco2.0%
Textile1.2%
Leather, Furs & Down0.3%
Papermaking & Paper Products
2.5%
Printing & Record Medium
0.0%Petroleum, Coking &
Nuclear Fuel3.1%Chemical Materials
& Products5.1%Medical &
Pharmaceutical0.4%
Chemical Fiber0.5%
Rubber0.2%
Plastic0.1%Nonmetal Mineral
8.3%
Ferrous Metals8.7%
Nonferrous Metals4.0%
Metal Products0.2%
Machine & Electronic Equipment
0.8%
Electric & Heat Power44.5%
Other Industries0.1%
Household15.8%
Industrial desulfurization rates by sectors of China in 2010Source: NBS, China statistical yearbook (2011)
7
1.4 Industrial desulfurization rates by sectors in 2010
63.9%
31.4%28.7%
18.1%
31.3%
15.0%
79.0%
54.2%
34.9%
61.8%
48.3%
31.7%
19.4%
31.9%
89.9%
23.5%
34.3%
68.3%
47.5%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%Mean desulfurization rate
66.0%
Above mean desulfurization rate
8
1.5 SO2 reduction in the 12th Five-Year Plan
China’s SO2 emission reduction target in the 12th Five-Year PlanSource: State Council of China, The Comprehensive Work Plan for Energy Conservation
and Emission Reduction During the 12th Five-Year Plan Period
3 provinces are allowed to increase SO2 emissions.
• SO2 emissions limit in 2015: 20.9 Mt, 8% below 2010 levels.
• 0.2 Mt is reserved for SO2 emission trading pilot projects among regions and enterprises.
9
2. Methodologies
Integrated assessment model framework
INV: Investment
Y = CON + INV + EC
maximize
PE: Electricity supply
PN: Non-electricity supply
CARTRD: Carbon import/export
Carbon EmissionCON:
Consumption
RSV: Proved reserves
CARLIM: Carbon limits
NENC: Non-energy carbon
Macroeconomic constraints1 Energy balance2
Emission evaluation3
YN = F(KN, LN, EN, NN)
E: Electricity
N: Non electricity
Y: Production output
prv: Reserve ratio
EMF: Emission factor
UDF: Utilility disounted factor
Learning rate
Expansion factor
EC: Energy cost
UTIL: Discounted utility
K: Capital stock L: Labor
ENTRD: Energy import/export
CTAX: Carbon tax
Two-level CES production
function
Technological learning
SO2 emission calculation
◦ SO2r: SO2 emissions in specific region.
◦ Qrse: Energy thermal consumptions in specific region, sector and energy source.
◦ Sre: Sulfur content in specific region and energy source.
◦ αre: SO2 emission factor in specific region and energy source.
◦ δre: Desulfurization rate in specific region and energy source.
Objective function
◦ UTIL: Discounted consumption.◦ C: Annual consumption.◦ udr: Utility discount rate.
10
2.1 SO2 emission calculation and objective function
s e
rerererser SQSO )1(22
R
r
T
trt
t
j rj CudrUTIL1 1
,
51
0 , )log()1(5
Four GDP growth scenarios◦ planned growth 12th Five-Year Plan: 7% ◦ GDP growth scenarios: 5%, 7%, 9% and 11%
Five possible desulfurization rates◦ desulfurization rate in 2010: 66.0%◦ desulfurization rate scenarios: 50%, 60% 70%, 80% and 90%◦ given exogenously due to the uncertainty of the popularizing rates of
desulfurization equipment All the scenarios are simulated:
◦ in view of China’s current economic development and energy consumption
◦ considering relevant environmental protection and greenhouse gas emission reduction
11
2.2 GDP growth and desulfurization scenarios
GDP growth Scenarios
Primary energy consumption
Electricity generation
Gross SO2 emissions
Household SO2 emissions
(%) (Mtoe) (TWh) (Mt) (Mt)5% 2673 5306 60.6
2.17% 2818 5893 65.0
2.29% 3001 6434 69.0
2.211% 3405 8193 80.7
2.3
12
3. Results and Discussion
SO2 emission scenarios of China in 2015
7% growth scenario reduces 14.0% of energy consumption per unit of GDP, slightly lower than the target of 16% set in the 12th Five-Year Plan.
The household SO2 emissions show little change due to the single emission source, namely the direct use of coal.
SO2 emitted by household use of petroleum gas/natural gas is ignored in this study.
SO2 emission reduction scenarios13
3.1 SO2 emission reduction scenarios
0
10
20
30
40
2010 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
SO₂ emissions Scenarios with different industrial desulfurization rate
SO₂ e
miss
ions
(Mt)
0
10
20
30
40
2010 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
SO₂ emissions Scenarios with different industrial desulfurization rate
SO₂ e
mis
sion
s (M
t)
0
10
20
30
40
2010 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
SO₂ emissions Scenarios with different industrial desulfurization rate
SO₂ e
mis
sion
s (M
t)
0
10
20
30
40
50
2010 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
SO₂ emissions Scenarios with different industrial desulfurization rate
SO₂ e
mis
sion
s (M
t)
5% growth 7% growth
11% growth9% growth
Industrial desulfurization rate needed for 12th 5-year plan targets
14
3.2 Industrial desulfurization rate needed for 12th 5-year plan
33.5%
63.9%69.9% 72.1% 73.8%
77.8%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2005 2010 5% 7% 9% 11%
GDP growth scenarios
Indu
stria
l des
ulfu
rizati
on ra
te n
eede
d fo
r 12
th 5
-yea
r pla
n ta
rget
s (%
)
Desulfurization rates should be raised above 70% due to the uncertainty of GDP growth.
The popularization of wet-type SO2 scrubbers and improvement of the environmental emission standards play an important role in the achievement of SO2 control target by 2015
SO2 emissions by power generation and other sectors,
and SO2 emissions intensity of power generation15
3.3 SO2 emissions of power generation industry sector
0
1
2
3
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
2010 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
GDP growth 5% GDP growth 7% GDP growth 9% GDP growth 11%
SO₂ e
mis
sion
inte
nsity
of p
ower
gen
erati
on (g
/kW
h)
SO₂ e
mis
sion
s (M
t)
Emissions by other sectors (Left) SO₂ emissions by power generation
Emission intensity of power generation (Right)
This study makes a comprehensive assessment of energy related SO2 emissions control in China’s 12th Five-Year Plan based on a large scale non-linear integrated assessment model.
1. There is a relative large potential for China to reduce SO2 emissions technologically and the popularization of wet-type SO2 scrubbers and improvement of the
environmental emission standards play an important role in the achievement of SO2 control target by 2015.
2. The improvement in energy consumption structure contributes to SO2 and other energy related emission controls effectively, as well as the sustainable development of energy.
3. The thresholds of desulfurization for different growth scenarios, namely 5%, 7%, 9% and 11% scenarios, to achieve the SO2 emission control target are presented in this study, as 69.9%, 72.1%, 73.8% and 77.8, respectively.
4. Future environmental policy should concentrate on the provinces which emit SO2 seriously, like Shandong, Inner Mongolia and Henan, or relevant industrial sectors such as electric & heat power, ferrous metals and nonmetal mineral sectors.
16
4. Conclusions
BP (2013), "BP Statistical Review of World Energy", June, 2013. BP Publishing.IEA (2012), "Energy Balances of non-OECD Countries 2012 Edition" OECD Publishing. Kanada, M., Dong, L., Fujita, T., Fujii, M., Inoue, T., Hirano, Y., Togawa, T., et al. (2013). Regional disparity and cost-effective SO 2 pollution control
in China: A case study in 5 mega-cities. Energy Policy, (In Press). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.105Kaneko S, Fujii H, Sawazu N and Fujikura R (2010), "Financial allocation strategy for the regional pollution abatement cost of reducing sulfur
dioxide emissions in the thermal power sector in China", Energy Policy. Vol. 38(5), pp. 2131 - 2141. Lin B, Jiang Z and Zhang P (2011), "Allocation of sulphur dioxide allowance – An analysis based on a survey of power plants in Fujian province in
China ", Energy. Vol. 36(5), pp. 3120 - 3129. Lin W, Xu X, Ma Z, Zhao H, Liu X and Wang Y (2012), "Characteristics and recent trends of sulfur dioxide at urban, rural, and background sites in
North China: Effectiveness of control measures", Journal of Environmental Sciences. Vol. 24(1), pp. 34 - 49. Lu Z, Streets DG, Zhang Q, Wang S, Carmichael GR, Cheng YF, Wei C, Chin M, Diehl T and Tan Q (2010), "Sulfur dioxide emissions in China and
sulfur trends in East Asia since 2000", Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. Vol. 10(13), pp. 6311-6331. MEP (2003), Emission standard of air pollutants for thermal power plants (GB 13223-2003), Beijing: China Environmental Science Press.MEP (2011), Emission standard of air pollutants for thermal power plants (GB 13223-2011), Beijing: China Environmental Science Press.NBS, China Statistical Yearbook (1990-2012), China Statistics Press.NBS & MEP, China statistical yearbook on environment (1998-2012), China Statistics Press.SCC (State Council of China), (2011), The Comprehensive Work Plan for Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction During the 12 th Five-Year
Plan Period.Schreifels JJ, Fu Y and Wilson EJ (2012), "Sulfur dioxide control in China: policy evolution during the 10th and 11th Five-Year Plans and lessons for
the future", Energy Policy. Vol. 48(0), pp. 779 - 789. Su, X., Zhou, W., Nakagami, K., Ren, H., & Mu, H. (2012). Capital stock-labor-energy substitution and production efficiency study for China. Energy
Economics, 34(4), 1208–1213. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2011.11.002.US EPA (2003). Air Pollution Technology Fact Sheet, Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) - Wet, Spray Dry, and Dry Scrubbers. EPA-452/F-03-034.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/ttncatc1/products.html#aptecfacts [Accessed June 1, 2013].
Wang X, Liu H, Pang J, Carmichael G, He K, Fan Q, Zhong L, Wu Z and Zhang J (2013), "Reductions in sulfur pollution in the Pearl River Delta region, China: Assessing the effectiveness of emission controls", Atmospheric Environment. Vol. 76, pp. 113 - 124.
Xu, Y. (2011). Improvements in the Operation of SO2 Scrubbers in China’s Coal Power Plants. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(2), 380–385. doi:10.1021/es1025678.
Zhao B, Wang S, Wang J, Fu JS, Liu T, Xu J, Fu X and Hao J (2013), "Impact of national NOx and SO2 control policies on particulate matter pollution in China ", Atmospheric Environment . Vol. 77(0), pp. 453 - 463. 17
References
18
Thank you for listening.