INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENTDecision Maker Workshop

February 26, 2013

Franklin County Emergency Management and Homeland Security

Agenda

1. Authorities2. Integrated Risk Management Overview 3. Risk/Capability/Gap Formula4. Risks5. Capabilities6. Gaps7. Recommended Actions

Franklin County Emergency Management and Homeland Security (FCEM&HS) is authorized under Chapter 5502 of the Ohio Revised Code and organized under the 1988 Countywide Agreement to coordinate countywide all-hazards emergency management and disaster preparedness functions for the 42 local government jurisdictions of Franklin County.

•“…are designed or undertaken to minimize the effects upon the civilian population caused or that could be caused by any hazard and that are necessary to address mitigation, emergency preparedness, response, and recovery.”

3

FCEM&HS Emergency Management Authority

4

FCEM&HS Core Competencies Ohio Revised Code:5502.21 – 5502.51

• Warning Systems: “The control and use of emergency communications, lighting, and warning equipment and systems.”

• Emergency Operations Center: “The development and construction of emergency operations centers for the conduct and support of coordination, direction, and control activities.”

• Resources: “The development of resource initiatives.”

• Recovery: “All activities required and necessary to return an area to its former condition to the extent possible following the occurrence of any hazard.”

5

FCEM&HS Core Competencies Ohio Revised Code:5502.21 – 5502.51 • Planning: “The development of an all-hazards emergency

operations plan that has been coordinated with all agencies, boards, and divisions having emergency management functions.”

• Training: “The recruitment, retention, and training of personnel.”

• Exercises: “The preparation and conduct of an annual exercise of the all-hazards emergency operations plan.”

• Citizen Preparedness: “Activities that may be necessary for survival and the overall health, safety, and welfare of the civilian population.”

• Grants: Administration of SHSP, EMPG, Citizen Corp, HMEP, PUCO.

• In 2009, FCEM&HS changed the Homeland Security paradigm for Franklin County by implementing a risk-based approach to better prepare for, respond to and recover from all-hazards.

• This innovative, risk-based approach resulted in a partnership between FCEM&HS, Ohio EMA and policy makers from Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

• FCEM&HS was selected by DHS as a pilot program to develop an Integrated Risk Management philosophy and program.

6

Integrated Risk Management (IRM)

Integrated Risk Management (IRM)

• Taking a risk-based approach, assessing our capabilities, and identifying our gaps, is instrumental in our ability to shape the emergency management and homeland security strategic planning and policy-making process.

• Integrated Risk Management is a process to fuse, unify, and inform the Homeland Security Enterprise.

• You are all a strategic part of the Homeland Security Enterprise.

7

Fire

Non-Profits EMA NGOs

LE

Federal

HealthDecisionMakers

PrivateSectorCEOs

State

Citizens

“Silo-ed” Approach

Integrated Approach

Fire

EMA

LE

PrivateSectorCEOs

Citizens

Health

DecisionMakers

State

FederalLocalJurisdictions

State andFederal Partners

NGOsNon-Profits

EmergencyPartners

Homeland Security Enterprise

• Homeland Security Enterprise (HSE) is a “whole community” approach.

• Utilizes partnerships among emergency management, law enforcement, public health, local/state/federal government, private sector, nongovernmental organizations, faith-based & community-based organizations, and the public.

• Federal guidance focus is on all-hazards preparedness; local HSE partners must share info regardless of threat or hazard, man-made or natural.

• Foundation of IRM is understanding the Risk Capabilities Gaps Decision-Making process.

FCEM&HS

Communication & Coordination• Participation by Decision Makers in the

Homeland Security Enterprise is key to fully realizing integrated risk management.

Decision Maker Education and Engagement

Homeland Security Enterprise

11

Risk/Capability/GapFormula

Resource Allocation, Planning, Training, Exercises, Funding

Priorities

Franklin CountyThreat Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA)

Franklin County Core Capability Assessment

Franklin County Gap Analysis

CapabilitiesRisk Results

Decision Maker Review & Updates

GapsCapabilitiesRisk RecommendedActions

Resource Allocation,Planning, Training, Exercises, Funding

Priorities

Gaps

Integrated Risk Management Components

13

Risk Process

• Develop likely, worse-case scenarios

• Identify risk factors

• Weight risk factors

• Score risks

• Update Risk Assessment based on new methodology and scoring risks

2010 Risks• Flooding• Severe Winter Weather• Dam Failure• Terrorism• Infectious Disease• Tornadoes• Severe Summer Weather• Extreme Heat• Hazardous Materials Incidents• Drought• Utility Interruptions or Failures• Invasive Species• Air and Water Pollution/Contamination• Transportation Accident – Aircraft• Civil Disturbance• Earthquake

• Tornadoes• Dam Failure• Flooding• WMD Terrorist Incident• Cyber-Terrorism • Infectious Disease • Severe Winter Weather • Hazardous Material Incident• Transportation Accident - Aircraft• Severe Summer Weather• Utility Interruptions or Failures • Civil Disturbance • Lone-Wolf Terrorist • Air and Water Pollution/ Contamination• Extreme Heat • Drought• Invasive Species • Earthquakes

2013 Risks

Risk Results

Risk scoring process can be found in the Risk Assessment Executive Summary & Methodology (Tab 4)

Risk scoring process can be found in the Risk Assessment Executive Summary & Methodology (Tab 4)

15

Capability Process

• Identify priority Core Capabilities based on scenarios

• Develop Capability Assessment Survey based on the Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA)

• Assess Capability current levels with preparedness goals

• Identify “Top 13” Capabilities based on survey results

THIRA can be found in Tab 5 & Survey Results in Tab 6

THIRA can be found in Tab 5 & Survey Results in Tab 6

PREVENT PROTECT MITIGATE RESPONDPlanning

Public Information and Warning

Operational Coordination

Intelligence and Information Sharing

Planning

Public Information and Warning

Operational Coordination

Cybersecurity

Intelligence and Information Sharing

Planning

Public Information and Warning

Operational Coordination

Threats and Hazard Identification

Planning

Public Information and Warning

Operational Coordination

Critical Transportation

Environmental Response / Health and Safety

Infrastructure Systems

Mass Care Services

Mass Search and Rescue Operations

On-Scene Security and Protection

Operational Communications

Public and Private Services and Resources

Public Health and Medical Services

Situational Assessment

Planning

Public Information and Warning

Operational Coordination

Infrastructure Systems

Forensics and Attribution

Interdiction and Disruption

Screening, Search, and Detection

Access Control and Identity Verification

Interdiction and Disruption

Physical Protective Measures

Risk Management for Protection Programs

and ActivitiesScreening, Search, and

DetectionSupply Chain Integrity

and Security

Community Resilience

Long-Term Vulnerability Reduction

Risk and Disaster Resilience Assessment

Fatality Management Services

Economic Recovery

Health and Social Services

Housing

Natural and Cultural Resources

RECOVER

Priority Core Capabilities

17

Capability Assessment Results

Core CapabilitiesPriority Sequence

“Top 13”1—Public Information & Warning2—Operational Coordination3—Planning4—Mass Care Services5—Critical Transportation6—Infrastructure Systems7—Cybersecurity8—On-scene Security & Protection9—Mass Search & Rescue Operations10—Operational Communications11—Environmental Response/Health & Safety12—Public Health & Medical Services13—Intelligence & Information Sharing

Capability Prioritization process can be found in the Gap Analysis (Tab 7)

Capability Prioritization process can be found in the Gap Analysis (Tab 7)

18

Gap Process

• Use Capability Assessment to identify Gaps

• Prioritize to ensure the higher priority Gaps are accurately identified

• Identify Solution Areas to determine ways to close the Gaps

• Finalize with written Gap Analysis

Gaps Analysis Results

19

Core Capability Corresponding Gap Closures

Public Information & Warning

Continue outreach with elected officials and various organizations to ensure there are programs to support and provide prompt and accurate information to the public, including people with functional needs.

Operational Coordination

Assign Corrective Actions from the After Action Report/Improvement Plan (AAR/IP) to the appropriate department or agency and encourage departments to follow through with Improvement Plans and ensure Corrective Actions are completed.

PlanningContinue to encourage, educate and generate more involvement and support from elected officials.

Mass CareServices

Provide cross-training of staff for emergency partners to ensure backup positions are prepared and trained to handle additional responsibilities.

CriticalTransportation

Effectively implement mutual aid assistance agreements and compacts.

Infrastructure SystemsEncourage training for chief executives and other key officials in Franklin County and from local jurisdictions to participate in the Homeland Security Enterprise.

Cybersecurity

Build organizational structures and relationships, establish coordination linkages, and develop and implement training programs to enhance Cybersecurity among the whole community in Franklin County.

Entire Gap Closure list can be found in the Gap Analysis (Tab 7)

Entire Gap Closure list can be found in the Gap Analysis (Tab 7)

20

Recommended Actions

• Implement an Annual Decision Maker meeting to review IRM progress and continue to encourage, educate and generate more involvement and support from elected officials

• Continuation of training and multi-discipline, regional exercises

• Maintain organizational structures and current working groups to ensure emergency management and homeland security partners continue to collaborate despite declining grant funding

• Develop a Cybersecurity Workgroup to build organizational structures and relationships among the whole community in Franklin County

Decision Maker Education and Engagement

Homeland Security Enterprise

21

Risk/Capability/GapFormula

Resource Allocation, Planning, Training, Exercises, Funding

Priorities

Franklin CountyThreat Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA)

Franklin County Core Capability Assessment

Franklin County Gap Analysis

CapabilitiesRisk Results

Decision Maker Review & Updates

GapsCapabilitiesRisk RecommendedActions

Resource Allocation,Planning, Training, Exercises, Funding

Priorities

Gaps

QUESTIONS/DISCUSSION

Franklin County Emergency Management and Homeland Security