integrated simulation technologies pvt ltd partner in engine performance simulation 1 subir mandal...
TRANSCRIPT
1Preferred partner in engine performance simulation
Subir MandalIST
India GT-SUITE Conference 2018
Integrated Simulation Technologies Pvt Ltd
Preferred partner in engine performance simulation
UHC System Sizing to Eliminate Engine Overheating when Grill and Radiator Fronts are Partially Blocked by Mud & Dirt
2Preferred partner in engine performance simulation
Engine Cooling System
Maintain the working temperature of every engine components below the safety limitThermal balance between the heat extracted from the engine hardware and the heat released to external ambient through radiator
Engine performance/efficiencyEmissionsReliability of the componentsClearance of the engine’s static and moving parts CarburetionLubricant properties
Rated powerPeak torqueIdleHot airBlockageClimbing
2
1
4
3
Heat transfer areaCoolant flowAirflow
3Preferred partner in engine performance simulation
Problem Statement
25% of both front grill and radiator core are blocked by mud and dirt50OC ambient air temperature
Suggest design improvement to eliminate engine overheating when it operates under worst conditions
Engine overheating (T_Coolant_EngOut > 110OC)
Tractor engine
Less temperature gradient between coolant & ambient airLess heat rejection in radiator
Less airflow through radiatorLess heat rejection in radiator
4Preferred partner in engine performance simulation
Discretized UHS
Underhood system in
Quasi-3D environment
FanFan
shroud
Outlet
Engine cooling
system circuit
Heat addition
Pump
UHC
Grill Opening
Radiator front
blocked
Flow domain Engine
Radiator
Front grill
blocked
Quasi-3D UHS
Radiator
Fan
Virtual Cooling System Model
Underhood system in
Quasi-3D environment
5Preferred partner in engine performance simulation
ChallengesFan map data:
Insufficient number of data pointsExtremely raw data setMap was rationally scaled to match performance
Radiator performance map data:Insufficient number of data pointsData was rationally pre-processed to get a good fit of performance parameters
Coolant properties vs engine heat addition:Heat addition from engine to coolant was calculated analyticallyAdjustment to make heat addition, temperature rise, and coolant properties (ρ , Cp) compatible
Modeling blockage due to mud and dirt:Front grillFront of radiator
6Preferred partner in engine performance simulation
Model Calibration
8 operating points including rated power, peak torqueAmbient temperature = 42OCNo blockage of front grill and radiator frontPredicted radiator inlet and outlet temperature w.r.t. their measured values within ±1.2OC
7Preferred partner in engine performance simulation
Performance under Worst Conditions (1/2)
Engine overheating limit is crossed by 1OC – 6OC under 50OC hot ambient & no blockage conditionsEngine overheating limit is crossed by 17OC – 24OC under 50OC hot ambient & blockage conditions
8Preferred partner in engine performance simulation
Performance under Worst Conditions (2/2)
8 OC increase in ambient temperature leads to 8.5OC temperature rise for both engine out coolant and radiator out air25% blockage resulted in temperature rise of 17OC for engine out coolant; and 6OC for radiator out airThere is a reduction in airflow through radiator by 16.5% due to 25% blockage
9Preferred partner in engine performance simulation
Model Validation
Virtual cooling system model is robust enough to be used for further investigation
Simulation Measured Simulation Measured
dT_Coolant_EngOut for T_Amb change 42OC to 50
OC K 8.6 8 8.7 8.1
dT_Coolant_EngOut due to 25% blockage K 18.5 19.7 17.7 18.4
dAirFlowRate_Rad due to 25% blockage % -16.6 -15.8 -16.5 -16.2
Peak torqueParameters Unit
Rated power
25% of front grill blocked 25% of radiator front blocked
10Preferred partner in engine performance simulation
25 mm taller & 20 mm wider radiator core- Tube length = +25 mm- Number of tubes = +(2x5=10)
100% increase in coolant flow rate- Higher pump power consumption
A-1
A-2
A-3
Temperature reduction of 6OC – 8OC
Temperature reduction of 19OC – 26OC
Temperature reduction of 19OC – 27OC
Approach to Eliminate Engine Overheating
65-80% increase in airflow rate- Fan drive ratio from 1.7 to 3.2 OR
through larger diameter fan- Higher fan power consumption- More space required
100 mm taller & 100 mm widerradiator core- Tube length = +100 mm- Number of tubes = +(10x5=50)
100% increase in coolant flow rate- Higher pump power consumption
25% increase in airflow rate- Fan drive ratio from 1.7 to 2.6
OR through larger diameter fan- Higher fan power consumption- More space required
25 mm taller & 20 mm wider radiator core- Tube length = +25 mm- Number of tubes = +(2x5=10)
100% increase in coolant flow rate- Higher pump power consumption
11Preferred partner in engine performance simulation
Air velocity at radiator inlet
Coolant side temperature
No blockage @ 50OC 25% blockage @ 50OC 25% blockage @ 50OC @ Optimized
No blockage @ 50OC 25% blockage @ 50OC 25% blockage @ 50OC @ Optimized
Contours Plots of Radiator
12Preferred partner in engine performance simulation
Recommended UHC system arrangement to eliminate engine overheating
25 mm taller & 20 mm wider radiator core- Tube length = +25 mm- Number of tubes = +(2x5=10)
100% increase in coolant flow rate- Higher pump power consumption
65-80% increase in airflow rate- Fan drive ratio to be increased from 1.7 to 3.2 OR through larger diameter fan- Higher fan power consumption- More space required
The new radiator has heat rejection capacity 12 kW higher than the existing one
Conclusion