intellectual capital efficiency and …kamath (2008) conducted research on drug and pharmaceutical...

ijcrb.webs.com

INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN BUSINESS

COPY RIGHT © 2012 Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research

405

MAY 2012

VOL 4, NO 1

INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL EFFICIENCY AND CORPORATE

PERFORMANCE IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: A COMPARISON

BETWEEN ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL BANKS OF PAKISTAN

Madiha Latif (Corresponding Author) Institute of Management Sciences

Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan

Muhammad Shoukat Malik Institute of Management Sciences

Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan

Sumaira Aslam Department of management Sciences

The Islamia University Of Bahawalpur, Pakistan

Abstract Purpose- The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between intellectual capital, efficiency of

value added (VA) by the major components of a firm’s resource base (physical capital, Human capital and

structural capital), and three traditional dimensions of corporate performance: profitability, productivity, and

market valuation of Islamic and conventional banks of Pakistan.

Design/methodology/approach- Correlation and multiple regression analysis are applied to measure the impact

of ICE on Performance. Eviews 3.0 is used for applying granger causality test.VAIC is calculated for measuring

intellectual capital efficiency. Data required for calculating VAIC is collected through the annual reports from

the 2006-2010 and from Karachi stock exchange.

Findings- In terms of the predicted hypotheses, the results from each component of VAIC, the correlation

between the three resources bases and profitability, productivity and market valuation are mixed..From the

values of beta, and R2, a significant association is determined between human capital efficiency and almost all

variables of corporate performance, in case of Islamic banks, and a significant relationship is found between

capital employed efficiency and all variables of performance in case of conventional banks. It means human

capital efficiency is the main predictor of corporate performance of Islamic banks, while the capital employed

efficiency is the main predictor of corporate performance conventional banks.

Originality/value- This study is the first of its own type that measures the intellectual capital performance of

PURE ISLAMIC banks and impact of ICE on corporate performance around the world and especially in

Pakistan.

Keywords: Intellectual capital performance, Corporate performance, Human capital, Structural capital,

Capital employed, Pakistan, VAIC, Islamic Banks.

1. Introduction

21st century is a century of knowledge economy, as there is a move from production era to knowledge era

and from production labor to knowledge worker, which consequently enhanced the overall productivity in

the economy. Due to this conversion many companies and even countries are planning and repositioning

their strategies. Business resources comprise of 20% tangible value and 80% intangible value in the

existing epoch of knowledge economy (Roos et al. 2005). But existing corporate performance

measurement system is heavily inclined towards financial alone and lacks the relevant information on

performance of Intellectual Capital (IC). So the recent researchers argue that maximum productivity is

achieved only through novel methods of monitoring of intangible assets.

The banking industry is one of the knowledge-intensive industries. Intellectual Capital (IC) generally

represents the critical resource in the value creation process. IC is considered crucial for the

competitiveness of companies regardless of the industry. Johnson and Kaplan (1987) have suggested that

IC might be the most important consideration regarding the performance of a company

ijcrb.webs.com



406

MAY 2012

VOL 4, NO 1

Bornemann (1999) suggested correlation between intellectual potential and organizational performance.

Banking sector is one of the sectors, utilizing intensive Intellectual Capital. With regards to bank

performance and intellectual capital, there are some researches that study the role of Intellectual Capital on

banks’ performance. Pulic (1997, 2002) used VAIC model, which he developed, measured intellectual

capital performance of Austrian banks in 1993-1995 and Croatian banks in 1996-2000. But there is no such

type of research has been conducted on Islamic banking sector around the world.

Purpose of IC management is to gain competitive advantage in a free market knowledge economy. This

competitive edge is gained through enhancing value creation efficiency from human brain’s creative

expertise, operational structure and customer & supplier relations. It is observed that simply hiring human

capital (HC) and deploying structural capital (SC) does not ensure higher organizational performance,

unless they are exploited for maximum value creation activities. An extended VAIC model would help to

measure and maximize the IC efficiency in more integrated manner. Competition for Islamic banks is

increasing day by day as in increase in no. of Islamic banks and as well as offerings of Islamic financial

products by the conventional banks. So value creation is necessary for Islamic banks to maintain

competitive advantage and for value creation in today’s hypercompetitive environment.

As found by present researchers (Malik, Malik, & Mustafa,2011),one of the recent issues that Islamic

banks are facing is the lack of expert Islamic finance professionals having the knowledge of both finance

and religion .i.e. skilled and expert human capital, which is one of the main components of intellectual

capital. Previously no research has been done on Islamic banking sector to determine the impact of

intellectual capital efficiency on the performance of Islamic The following research is filling the gap by

proving the importance of intellectual capital for the value creation process of Islamic banks and its

impact on overall corporate performance of Islamic banks. Following are the major objectives of current

research: to investigate whether intellectual capital efficiency has an impact on overall corporate

performance; to ascertain apparent understanding about the significance of IC in Islamic bank’s

performance; to identify components of intellectual capital that are more important in the value creation

process of Islamic and conventional banks; to determine whether Human capital development is necessary

for the profitability and success of Islamic banks.

2. Literature Review

In today’s hypercompetitive and dynamic environment financial industry, specially banking institutions are

facing fierce competition. Competition at a cross-border scale makes both conventional and Islamic banks adjust

their competitive position to sustain their corporate performance. The banking industry is one of the knowledge-

intensive industries. Intellectual Capital (IC) generally represents the critical resource in the value creation

process. Due to globalization financial institutions have to transact their financial products and banking as one

of the services enriched, and knowledge intensive industry also has to manage its knowledge base to gain

competitive advantage. It is widely recognized that intellectual capital, which is considered as strategic recourse

for business success has vital part in deriving the growth of any business. (Huang and Liu, 2005).As intellectual

capital is an essential part of value creating process, so intellectual capital information got importance in the

organizational context. (Bukh, 2003).

Intellectual capital has been recognized as an indispensable business perimeter which plays critical role in

enhancing overall corporate performance. Many researchers have studied the association and correlation

between intellectual capital and organizational performance around the world, especially in the developed

countries. The research society in the developed world is quite familiar with the term IC in their academic and

professional research, but there are limited studies have been done in the case of emerging economies like

Pakistan.

2.1 Studies Conducted On Intellectual Capital Performance and Its Influence On Corporate Performance

Around The World

Belkaoui (2003) has tested the relationship between intellectual capital and the performance of selected multi-

national companies of USA. The idea of his paper was to examine either recourse based view is better measure

of firm performance or stakeholder view. He used a sample of US multinational firms and found that results are

statistically significant in terms of both views. He examined the relationship between Return on assets

(stakeholder view) and intangible assets of intellectual capital (resource-based view), and found that intellectual

capital is positively related with financial performance of an organization.Suresh (2005) investigated the inter

relationship between different constituents of intellectual capital and firm value creation by conducting in-depth

study of an innovative project of Transact co (an Australian financial firm).He found that by considering IC in

action, the correlation between value creation and different components of IC were temporarily conditional and

pluralistic.

ijcrb.webs.com



407

MAY 2012

VOL 4, NO 1

Sofian et al. (2005) have observed the influence of degree and form of IC on management accounting practices,

particularly, performance measurement and corporate performance. They have explored that whether firms

investing heavily on intellectual capital are more likely to put emphasis on non financial measures of

performance, and also the impact of IC on performance. For this purpose they have conducted the research on

sample of 100 companies having low and high IC, and found that IC has influence on the corporate

performance.Chen et al. (2005) have tried to examine the relationship between the value creation efficiency and

firm’s market valuation and financial performance. They have drawn a sample of Taiwanese firms for this

purpose and used Vaic TM

model for measuring the intellectual Capital efficiency and regression model for

checking the impact of intellectual capital on performance and market value of firm. They have found

statistically significant results in support of their hypothesis that the intellectual capital has a positive association

with the market value and the financial performance.

Santanu and Amitava (2009) conducted a survey on Indian software and pharmaceutical firms to examine and

measure the correlation among intellectual capital and organizational performance. Data was taken from annual

reports of respected companies from 2002 to 2006.They used VAIC TM

for measurement of IC and productivity,

profitability and market value are taken as performance measures of firm. They analyzed the data by using

multiple regression analysis and found that IC is correlated significantly with profitability, but not with market

valuation and productivity. Shiu (2006) carried out a survey on 80 Taiwanese listed technological firms for year

2003 and measured their value creation efficiency with the help of new accounting measurement tool of IC

(VAIC TM

) used by Pulic in his various researches. The principle purpose of his research was to explore the

influence of VAIC index on profitability, productivity and market valuation. He used correlation and multiple

regression analysis for empirical analysis. He found that VAIC had significant positive influence on profitability

and market valuation, while negative relationship with productivity.

Saleim et al. (2007) conducted research on companies in Egyptian software industry context to assess the

correlation between human capital and organizational performance. For this purpose a sample of 38 companies

was taken and data was analyzed with the help of correlation analysis and stepwise regression. The results

generally support the previous researches and showed positive correlation between human capital and firm

performance, as six of nine proposed hypothesis were statistically supported. Dipanker and Anne (2007)

investigated whether intellectual capital is important in firm evaluation. They have found that IC measures are

integral part of measurement of firm value, and IC and financial measures also have an impact on investment

suggestions of financial researchers, depending on rank of performance and the holding time period of

investment.

Kamath (2008) conducted research on drug and pharmaceutical industry of India, and investigated the

correlation among the measures of intellectual capital and traditional performance measures of performance:

productivity, profitability and market valuation of firm. She used VAIC TM for measurement of IC of sample of

25 companies. The finding of her study showed that domestic firms are more efficient in terms of IC, and human

capital is positively associated with firm profitability and productivity. According to Kamath (2008) the

correlation analysis provided a slight indication that the human assets are more important than the physical and

structural assets in industry’s profitability and productivity rankings. According to her human capital was the

one which was seen to have the major impact on the profitability and productivity of the firms.

Another study has examined four aspects of the relationship: (1) A positive correlation between a company’s IC

and its performance; (2) a positive relationship between increased value of a company’s IC and that Company’s

future performance;(3) a positive correlation between the rate of growth of a company’s IC and that company’s

future performance; and (4) that the contribution of IC to company performance will differ from industry to

industry.(Pew, David, & Phil, 2007).Dimitrios, Dimitrios, Charalampos, & Georgios (2011) conducted a

research on a sample of 96 Greek companies listed in Athens stock exchange to examine the impact of

intellectual capital on performance of firm. They analyzed the data with the help of multiple regression and their

results indicated the existence of a significant relationship between one of the three components of IC (human

capital efficiency) and one of the three indicators of financial performance (ROE).

Firer and Williams (2003) carried out a research on South African business firms that were heavily dependent

on intellectual capital. The basic purpose of their research was to explore the association between traditional

measures of corporate performance: productivity, profitability and market valuation and human capital,

structural capital and physical capital (major components of firm recourse base).They used linear multiple

regression analysis and correlation for empirical analysis .They found that physical capital significantly

associated with corporate performance, while the relationship between other variables and corporate

performance was mixed and limited.

Hang (2009b) investigated the impact of intellectual capital on financial aspects of firm performance and also

identified the driving role of IC components for the leading role of financial indicators of companies listed in the

ijcrb.webs.com



408

MAY 2012

VOL 4, NO 1

Hong Kong stock exchange. He collected the data from 2001 to 2005, and used VAIC TM

methodology for

measurement of intellectual capital. Four financial performance measures were selected, and impact was

examined through multiple regression models. He found no significant association between intellectual capital

performance and financial performance of these listed companies, except the moderate relationship between

profitability and IC. His research also revealed that companies highly regarded physical capital than other

capitals for enhancing their market value.

2.2 Studies Conducted On Intellectual Capital Performance & Its Influence On Corporate Performance

On Banking Sector Around the World:

As banking industry is one of the service based and knowledge intensive industries, so banking sector exploits

intensive intellectual capital. With regards to bank performance and intellectual capital, there are few researches

that examine the influence of Intellectual Capital on banks’ performance. Like Pulic (1997, 2002) used VAIC

model, which he developed, measured intellectual capital performance of Austrian banks in 1993-1995 and

Croatian banks in 1996-2000. Findings of both studies disclosed the noteworthy differences in ranking of banks

on the basis of intellectual capital efficiency and conventional accounting measures.Mavridis (2004) analyzed

the capital employed and intellectual capital of japans banks for the year 2000, and discussed their impact on

value based performance of banks. He also found significant differences in intellectual capital performance

among different groups of Japanese banks (Mavridis, 2004).

A research was conducted in Australia to measure the intellectual capital performance of Australian owned

banks. Researchers used VAIC TM

to measure the intellectual capital performance of 11 banks, as these banks

were the major constituent of total market share of Australian banking industry. It was revealed from the

research Human costs and value addition was positively associated with intellectual capital performance.

Human capital efficiency was greater than capital employed efficiency and structural capital efficiency. They

also identified that size of banks had no or little impact of intellectual capital performance of banks of Australia.

(Joshi, Cahill, & Sidhu, 2010)

Kiong & Hooi (2009) conducted a survey on the financial institutions of Malaysia from the period of 19999 to

2007 to calculate the intellectual capital performance of finance companies and also its impact on financial

performance of these companies. The findings of their study revealed that intellectual capital in the form of

VAIC index and all its three components were positively and significantly associated with return on assets and

profitability of companies in the financial sector. Williams (2001) conducted an empirical study to examine the

relationship between intellectual capital and disclosure practices of intellectual capital. He found insignificant

relationship between disclosure practices and IC. But at the same time he also concluded that but at higher level

of IC performance, intellectual capital disclosure practices seemed to be reduced.

Abdullah and Coskun (2007) conducted a research on quoted banks on Istanbul stock exchange market to

measure their intellectual capital performance, and also the effect of intellectual capital efficiency on financial

performance. Data were taken for the period 1995-2004, and VAIC TM

is used for measurement of intellectual

capital and data envelopment analysis is used for testing the impact of intellectual capital on profitability. They

found that the effect of intellectual capital on profitability on the banking sector on the ISE was approximately

61.3 percent. Their findings indicated that IC seems to be a more important factor than physical capital for

banks. They also observed the effect of intellectual capital on investor’s behavior.

2.3 Studies Conducted On Intellectual Capital Performance In Pakistan.

Very few researches have been conducted in Pakistan to find the relationship between intellectual capital and

firm’s performance. (Makki & Lodhi, 2008) conducted a research to examine the relationship between IC and a

firm’s profitability through empirical research. They drawn a sample of 25 companies of different industries

listed in Lahore stock exchange for five years to compute capital employed efficiency, human capital efficiency

and structural capital efficiency. They used VAIC TM

for measuring intellectual capital efficiency, and analyzed

the data with the help of multiple regression analysis. They found their hypothesis statistically significant that

Intellectual capital efficiency influences the profitability (net profit) of firms.

Makki et al. (2008) conducted a study on Lahore stock exchange index companies (LSE-25) to evaluate the

intellectual capital performance of companies of 2nd

largest stock exchange of Pakistan. They used VAIC TM

developed by Ante pulic to measure the IC performance. They found that chemical and cement sector, oil and

gas sector showed greater IC performance, while banking sector showed average performance, while public

companies were least efficient in terms of intellectual capital. Their main finding was that top performer

companies were most efficient in utilizing their human capital, and their human resources were the main assets

that were contributing towards value creation and value addition. Rehman, Ilyas, & Rehman (2011) conducted a

survey to examine the intellectual capital performance of KSE listed life and non life insurance companies for

ijcrb.webs.com



409

MAY 2012

VOL 4, NO 1

the year 2009. They found that Value added (VA) and VAIC TM

has a significant positive impact on financial

performance (ROE, EPS

In sum, the studies mentioned above clearly indicate the usefulness of intellectual capital and this motivates the

researchers to undertake an empirical study on the impact of the intellectual capital on the corporate financial

performance in the Islamic banking context, as well as for conventional banks as previously no studies have

been done on the intellectual capital performance of pure Islamic banks and its association with financial

performance, profitability, productivity and market valuation of pure Islamic banks.

2.4 Conceptual Framework for the Research Based On Literature Review:

Here is the proposed conceptual framework derived from the keen analysis of previous studies.

Figure 1: conceptual framework of relationship between ICE and corporate performance.

3. Research Methodology This is an exploratory research whose purpose is to explore whether the intellectual capital efficiency have a

positive impact on overall corporate performance of Islamic nad financial banks.

Following hypothesizes are developed for the following research:

H1: There is a positive impact of ICE, HCE, SCE, and CEE on return on equity of Islamic and conventional

banks, Ceteris Paribus.

H2: There is a positive impact of ICE, HCE, SCE, and CEE on return on Assets of Islamic and conventional

banks, Ceteris paribus.

H3: There is a positive impact of ICE, HCE, SCE, and CEE on return on Investment of Islamic and conventional

banks, Ceteris paribus

H4: There is a positive impact of ICE, HCE, SCE, and CEE on Earning per share of Islamic and conventional

banks, Ceteris paribus

H5: There is a positive impact of ICE, HCE, SCE, and CEE on productivity of Islamic and conventional banks,

Ceteris paribus.

H6: There is a positive impact of ICE, HCE, SCE, and CEE on market/book value of Islamic and conventional

banks, Ceteris paribus.

H7: There is a positive impact of ICE, HCE, SCE, and CEE on market value of Islamic and conventional banks,

Ceteris paribus.

As the whole population of Islamic banks is taken for the following research, so no sampling technique is used

for sampling. But for selection of conventional banks simple random sampling technique is used. Sample of

banks is drawn with the help of simple random sampling software available at worldwide web.All six Islamic

banks are selected for the following research. According to international audit, taxes and advisory firm KPMG

(2007) banking survey, Islamic banks come in the small banks segment of banking sector(Awan, 2009). So for

ijcrb.webs.com



410

MAY 2012

VOL 4, NO 1

balance comparison, a sample of 6 small conventional commercial banks is taken for the following research.

Following table represents the name of all the banks considered for research.

Islamic Banks Conventional banks

Albaraka Islamic Bank Bank Of Khyber Limited

Emirates Global Islamic Bank Askari Bank Limited

Dawood Islamic Bank Limited Samba Bank Limited

Bank Islami Limited Kasb Bank Limited

Meezan Bank Limited Summit Bank Limited

Dubai Islamic Bank Limited Js Bank Limited

Table 1: List of Islamic and Conventional Banks taken for Research.

The study is quantitative and based on 5years data that is generally provided by Islamic and conventional banks

in their audited annual reports. These annual reports for the period 2006 to 2010 were gathered through direct

contact, databases, Karachi stock exchange and websites of relevant banks. Stock prices were collected from

various issues of the daily Business Recorder; a leading business newspaper, to calculate the market value of the

banks’ ordinary shares. Other sources for collection of data were journals, articles, research papers, books,

newspapers and worldwide web.

4. Analysis and Discussion of Results

The Value Added Intellectual Coefficient (VAIC) used in this study as a basic methodology to measure the

intellectual capital was introduced by Pulic (1998)Correlation and Multiple Regression (ordinary least square)

method are applied to empirically investigate the dynamics of IC and impact of intellectual capital performance

on overall corporate performance.

These assumptions were checked before running the regression models. Independence is assumed as all values

of dependent variables were taken from separate banks. Linearity assumption is verified through scatter

diagrams between independent and dependent variables.

Durbin Watson (D-W) test was applied to diagnose first order Autocorrelation problem. D-W values lie between

1.2 to 2.8 for almost all models. This Range is determined through Durbin Watson table at 0.05 significance

level. It is inferred through table, if the value of D-W lies in the range of 1.2 to 2.8, then there is no auto

correlation in the data.

Problem of high correlation among independent variables is captured by calculating VIF value. Then the multi

co linearity is removed by transforming the data (first difference is taken).After transforming the data is found

that all the values of VIF are less than 10,so there is no problem of multi co linearity in the data, As Myer (1990)

suggests, value of VIF less than 10 does not cause threat Of multi co linearity. After transformation, data

becomes normally distributed.

The data for the study is not treated as sample as it is the population of All Islamic banks of Pakistan, so the

general regression equation for the population would be:

Yji = β0 + β1 X1i + β2 X2i + β3 X3i

+ …………+ BK XKi + ei

Table 4.1 and 4.2 describes the result of correlation analysisAs indicated from Table 4.1

human capital efficiency is significantly correlated with all the variables of financial

performance, but not with, productivity and market valuation.

ijcrb.webs.com



411

MAY 2012

VOL 4, NO 1

Correlation Matrix for Islamic banks.

Variables Human

Capital

efficiency

Earnings Per

Share

Return On

Assets

Return On

Equity

Return On

Investment

Productivi

ty Tobin q

Market/Bo

ok Ratio

Human Capital

efficiency 1.000

Earnings Per Share .669* 1.000

Return On Assets .549* .208 1.000

Return On Equity .685* .683* .773* 1.000

Return On Investment .853* .806* .460* .758* 1.000

Productivity -.080 -.456* .660* .281 -.074 1.000

Tobin q .338 .760* .035 .445* .349 -.499* 1.000

Market/Book Ratio .237 .692* .153 .502* .288 -.321 .936* 1.000

Note: *correlation is significant at 0.05 level for two tailed tests

Table 4.1 correlation analysis of HCE and Corporate performance of Islamic banks.

As indicated from Table 4.2 capital employed efficiency is significantly correlated with all

the variables of financial performance and productivity, but not with the market valuation.

Correlation Matrix for conventional banks.

Variables Capital

Employed

Efficiency

Earnings

Per Share

Return On

Assets

Return On

Equity

Return On

Investment

Producti

vity Tobin q

Market/B

ook Ratio

Capital Employed

Efficiency 1.000

Earnings Per Share .660* 1.000

Return On Assets .704* .722* 1.000

Return On Equity .793* .658* .748* 1.000

Return On

Investment .846* .596* .668* .949* 1.000

Productivity .599* .436* .577* .555* .622* 1.000

Tobin q -.143 -.134 -.413* -.110 -.061 -.326 1.000

Market/Book Ratio .236 .217 .385 .286 .241 .308 -.213 1.000

Note: *correlation is significant at 0.05 level for two tailed tests.

Table 4.2 Correlation analysis of CEE and Corporate performance of conventional banks

From correlation and regression analysis it is confirmed that there is a positive association between intellectual

capital efficiency, human capital efficiency, capital employed efficiency, negative but weak association of

structural capital efficiency and return on equity ratio of Islamic banks. Return on equity is significantly and

positively related with leverage and frequency of board meetings, but negatively associated with management

compensation and firm size.

There is a positive association between, human capital efficiency, leverage, and return on assets ratio of Islamic

banks. No significant relationship is found between return on assets and all other remaining variables.

There is a positive association between intellectual capital efficiency, human capital efficiency and return on

investment of Islamic banks. it is also found that return on investment is significantly and positively related with

ijcrb.webs.com



412

MAY 2012

VOL 4, NO 1

frequency of board meetings and leverage, but negatively related with firm size. No significant relationship is

found between capital employed efficiency, structural capital efficiency, management compensation and return

on investment.

A positive association is found between human capital efficiency and earnings per share of Islamic banks. There

is a weak negative relationship of capital employed efficiency, and structural capital efficiency with earning per

share. it is found that return on investment is significantly and positively related with leverage, and negatively

related with management compensation.

There is no significant association between productivity and intellectual capital efficiency, human capital

efficiency, capital employed efficiency, and structural capital efficiency of Islamic banks. There is also no

relationship found between productity and all other independent variables by applying correlation analysis.

ijcrb.webs.com



413

MAY 2012

VOL 4, NO 1

Regressends ROE ROA ROI EPS

Regressers Β sig MODEL Β sig MODEL β Sig MODEL β sig MODEL

constant 2.2 .005 .052 .899 4.369 .002 -8.091 .431

FSZ -.14 .003 R2= .73 -.002 .883 R 2 =0.280 -.291 .001 R 2 =0.743 .835 .186 R 2 =.473

LVRG 1.5 .000 DW=2.4 .073 .427 DW=1.61 2.324 .000 DW=2.34 5.586 .045 DW=2.23

MCOMP -.09 .948 SIG=0.0 -.004 .583 SIG=0.137 .010 .815 SIG=0.000 -.928 .018 SIG=0.006

FBMT .03 .042 .003 .259 .078 .013 .283 .251

ICE .05 .009 .001 .581 .061 0.042 -.033 .05

HCE .074 .009 .07 .044 .123 .002 .439 .05

SCE -.01 0.5 -.001 .582 -.005 .855 -.030 .865

CEE .003 .7 .000 .748 -.001 .929 -.077 .372

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Regressends PRODUCTIVITY M/B EQITY TOBIN Q

Regressers β sig MODEL β sig MODEL Β sig MODEL

Constant 8.359 .728 3.560 .536 -11.943 .519

FSZ -.806 .581 R2= .092 -3.851 .081 R2= .516 .174 .639 R2=. 491

LVRG -3.490 .580 DW=2.75 .541 .101 DW=1.99 .996 .281 DW=2.78

MCOMP .787 .368 SIG=0.78 -.693 .001 SIG=0.002 1.950 .092 SIG=0.065

FBMT -.253 .659 -.056 .586 -.744 .499

ICE .014 .935 .044 .031 .094 .963

HCE -.290 .671 .039 .035 .237 586

SCE -.130 .755 .077 .015 .097 .197

CEE .076 .708 .058 .023 -4.860 .637

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Table 4.3 Regression analysis of Islamic Banks

ijcrb.webs.com



414

MAY 2012

VOL 4, NO 1

Regressends ROE ROA ROI EPS

Regressers β sig MODEL β sig MODEL β sig MODEL β sig MODEL

constant 9.684 .642 -.049 .850 15.967 .600 -35.634 .094

FSZ .228 .845 R2=.1 .017 .249 R 2 =.349 .108 .949 R 2 =.18 3.074 .013 R 2 =.491

LVRG 3.280 .673 DW=1.9 .067 .488 DW=2.01 5.732 .614 DW=2.02 -1.014 .895 DW=2.5

MCOMP -.847 .211 SIG=0.7 -.021 .017 SIG=0.053 -1.075 .274 SIG=0.38 -1.898 .008 SIG=0.004

FBMT -.181 .629 -.002 .651 -.309 .572 -.298 .424

ICE .048 .711 .001 .531 .087 .649 .135 .034

HCE -.039 .782 .002 .025 -.038 .857 .211 .045

SCE .577 .084 -.006 .048 .841 .086 .211 .045

CEE -.369 .863 .049 .048 -.610 .754 -.389 .050

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Regressends PRODUCTIVITY M/B EQITY TOBIN Q

Regressers β sig MODEL β sig MODEL Β sig MODEL

Constant .019 .610 3.560 .536 1.188 .519

FSZ -.009 .691 R2=.41 -3.851 .081 R2=.516 -.321 .639 R2=.187

LVRG -.005 .608 DW=2.2 .541 .101 DW=1.99 -.112 .281 DW=2.4

MCOMP .007 .098 SIG=0.02 -.693 .001 SIG=0.002 .102 .092 SIG=0.34

FBMT .004 .187 -.056 .586 -.022 .499

ICE .01 .653 .044 .045 .000 .963

HCE .01 .072 .039 .086 -.007 .586

SCE .026 .983 .077 .035 .038 .197

CEE .983 .033 .058 .04 -.088 .637

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Table 4.4: regression Analysis of conventional Banks

ijcrb.webs.com



415

MAY 2012

VOL 4, NO 1

There is a positive association between intellectual capital efficiency, human capital efficiency, capital employed

efficiency, and structural capital efficiency market/book value of Islamic banks. It is found that return on investment

is significantly and positively related with firm size, but negatively related with management compensation.

There is no significant association between Tobin q ratio and intellectual capital efficiency, human capital

efficiency, capital employed efficiency, and structural capital efficiency of Islamic banks. There is also no

relationship found between Tobin q and all other independent variables by applying correlation analysis, except

human capital efficiency. It is positively correlated with Tobin q ratio.

Moreover it is confirmed from granger causality test that human capital efficiency is the main predictor of financial

performance of Islamic Banks.

From correlation and regression analysis it is found that there is no significant association between return on equity

and intellectual capital efficiency, human capital efficiency, capital employed efficiency, and structural capital

efficiency of conventional banks. There is also no relationship found between productivity and all other independent

variables by applying correlation analysis, except capital employed efficiency. It is positively correlated with return

on equity of conventional banks.

There is a positive association between, human capital efficiency, capital employed efficiency and return on assets

of conventional banks. From correlation analysis it is found that return on assets is significantly and positively

related with human capital efficiency, capital employed efficiency, but negatively related with structural capital

efficiency. There is no significant association between return on investment and intellectual capital efficiency,

human capital efficiency, capital employed efficiency, and structural capital efficiency of conventional banks. There

is also no relationship found between return on investment and all other independent variables by applying

correlation analysis, except capital employed efficiency. It is positively correlated with return on investment.

There is a positive association between intellectual capital efficiency, human capital efficiency, capital employed

efficiency, and earnings per share of earnings per share of conventional banks. It is found that earning per share is

significantly and positively related with capital employed efficiency and firm size, but negatively related with

management compensation. There is a positive association between intellectual capital efficiency, human capital

efficiency, capital employed efficiency and productivity of conventional banks. From correlation analysis it is found

that productivity is significantly and positively related with capital employed efficiency, and firm size. There is a

positive association between intellectual capital efficiency, human capital efficiency, capital employed efficiency,

and structural capital efficiency market/book value of conventional banks. It is found that market/book value is

significantly and positively related with firm size, but negatively correlated with leverage and management

compensation.

There is no significant association between Tobin q ratio and intellectual capital efficiency, human capital

efficiency, capital employed efficiency, and structural capital efficiency of conventional banks. There is also no

relationship found between Tobin q and all other independent variables by applying correlation analysis.

ijcrb.webs.com



416

MAY 2012

VOL 4, NO 1

It is interesting to discover that the there is a difference between accepted and rejected hypothesizes on the basis of

regression analysis. Here is the summary of all accepted and rejected hypothesizes for Islamic and conventional

banks.

5. Discussion and Conclusion

In a new economic era, when knowledge-intensive companies tend to dominate in the service based sector as in the

Pakistani banking sector, it is necessary to maximize the utilization of resources, in particular intellectual capital. As

in the 21th

century, business processes are less and less based on tangibles, which have been the base for traditional

management systems, the question arises how to manage not only processes and companies but also regional and

national economies in the case when intangible have become the key factor of value creation". Intellectual capital

has become the key resource of value creation. This is especially true in a knowledge-driven economy, such as

banking, where the value added of corporations, organizations and individuals is directly related to their knowledge

and Intellectual capital (Bontis, 2000).

There are two basic aims of this study. First, the intellectual capital performances of the Islamic and conventional

banks for the years 2006-2010 was calculated, and the change of VAIC during the years 2006 to 10 were compared.

This allowed both Islamic and conventional banks to benchmark themselves with their competitors in the sector.

The average intellectual capital efficiency of Islamic banks is much better than the intellectual capital performance

of conventional commercial banks during the study period. Individually, Albaraka Islamic bank has the highest

intellectual capital efficiency, followed by Meezan bank, Dubai Islamic banks and Burj bank. While in the

conventional banking sector, Summit Bank has relatively higher efficiency of intellectual capital, followed by

Askari Bank Limited. In sum, there is a room for improvement in both banking sectors to enhance their all types of

efficiencies that in turns enhances value creation efficiency of both conventional and Islamic banks, which results in

the improvement of overall business efficiency in the knowledge economy.

In conclusion, all banks are more efficient in terms of human capital than structural and capital employed

efficiencies. The main reason of more efficient human capital is effective and efficient usage of human resources.

The major contribution to the VAIC ranking always has come from Human capital efficiency rather than capital

employed efficiency. The main reason behind this is that many banks are operating with minimal staff and relying

on technology, this reduces their expenses on human assets and increases the returns on each rupee invested. They

also have few branches and believe in delivering specialized services. This is not surprising as the banking sector is

a service sector where its customer services rely heavily on human capital. Thus, it is assumed that IC, and

especially human capital seems to be a more important factor than physical capital for banks. The literature review

also supports this assumption (Mavridis, 2004; Mavridis and Kyrmizoglou, 2005). Next, the present study also

attempted to investigate the relationship between intellectual capital, efficiency of value added (VA) by the major

components of a firm’s resource base (physical capital, Human capital and structural capital), and three traditional

dimensions of corporate performance: profitability, productivity, and market valuation of Islamic and conventional

banks of Pakistan.

In terms of the predicted hypotheses, the results from each component of VAIC, the relationship between the three

resources bases and profitability, productivity and market valuation are mixed, a similar finding to Firer and

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa5398/is_200704/ai_n21290985/?lc=int_mb_1001

ijcrb.webs.com



417

MAY 2012

VOL 4, NO 1

Williams (2003). As for as Islamic banking is concerned, there is a positive association is found between intellectual

capital efficiency, human capital efficiency, capital employed efficiency and return on equity, return on assets,

return on investment, earning per share (indicators of financial performance).structural capital efficiency is

negatively related with all the variables of financial performance. It means investment in intellectual capital

especially in human capital enhances the financial performance. No significant relationship is found between

productivity and all components of intellectual capital performance. This is possibly due to specific structure and

practices of Islamic banks. A mixed relationship are found between market value ad components of intellectual

capital efficiency, as positive relationship with market to book value, and insignificant association with Tobin Q

ratio is identified.

As for as conventional banking is concerned, mixed results are attained, as a positive association is found between

intellectual capital efficiency, human capital efficiency, capital employed efficiency and return on assets and

earnings per share ,but no significant relationship is determined with return on equity and return on investment

(indicators of financial performance). In case of productivity, a significant relationship is found between

productivity and all components of intellectual capital performance. A mixed relationship are found between market

value ad components of intellectual capital efficiency, as positive relationship with market to book value, and

insignificant association with Tobin Q ratio is identified.

From the values of beta, and R2, a significant association is determined between human capital efficiency and almost

all variables of corporate performance, in case of Islamic banks and capital employed efficiency and all variables of

performance in case of conventional banks. It means human capital efficiency is the main predictor of corporate

performance of Islamic banks capital employed efficiency is the main predictor of corporate performance of

conventional banks. This is not surprising in the case of Islamic banks as the banking sector is a service sector

where its customer services rely heavily on human capital. Thus, it is assumed that IC, and especially human capital

seems to be a more important factor than physical capital for banks. The literature review also supports this

assumption (Mavridis, 2004; Mavridis and Kyrmizoglou, 2005).

6. Practical Implications and Limitations:

This study is important for managers who want to determine the possible required changes for the development of

intellectual capital in their companies. Although the overall efficiency of intellectual capital is found to be important

to increase the organizational performance, human capital efficiency of the companies has been found to be more

important to enhance the profitability, productivity and market value of the company. Therefore managers can give

decisions about more resource allocation for employee training and development and less for equipment or software

systems. The study helps to evaluate the performance of HC, SC and CE resources to enhance overall business

efficiency through diverting scarce resources in the value creating direction. It also creates awareness about IC and

its role to maintain the sustainable competitive advantage which leads to ultimate profitability in a competitive

environment of WTO era of knowledge economy. Keeping in view the significant role of IC in financial

performance, the study emphasizes the need to draw the guidelines for measuring and disclosing IC in financial

reports. Being supervisory body for corporate sector, Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan, Institute of

Chartered Accountants of Pakistan and the Institute of Cost & Management Accountants of Pakistan are urged to

ijcrb.webs.com



418

MAY 2012

VOL 4, NO 1

take an initiative in this regard to meet the information thrust of stakeholders. As Pakistan is opening its stock

markets for foreign investors, who always need financial and non-financial information to assist their investment

decisions. In a global environment, if information related to IC, health, safety, environment and Corporate social

responsibility issues is disclosed in the annual reports, it may enhance the value of the company in the eyes of

investors.

The study provides the strong proof to report IC and its efficiency in annual reports of joint stock companies. Which

will not only be useful in assessing the portfolio by existing and potential investors but benchmarking within

industry would also be possible. Due to availability of information related to IC efficiency, potential investors would

be in a better position to estimate the risk associated with their investment which may reduce borrowing cost and

ultimately reduction in weighted average cost of capital for the company. The study proves that VAIC can be used

by regulatory authorities to identify weaknesses and strengths of different industries to subsidize particular industrial

sector. This study also provides insights to various stakeholders, like scholars, shareholders, policy makers,

institutional investigators and other related stakeholders One of the recent issues that Islamic banks are facing is the

lack of expert Islamic finance professionals having the knowledge of both finance and religion .i.e. human capital,

which is one of the main components of intellectual capital. The present study determined the importance of human

capital to enhance value creation and business efficiency. But unfortunately there are no professional academic

institutes present in Pakistan, which produce the Islamic finance professionals. So there is a need of introducing a

field of specialization in Islamic finance in the universities as well. This study is based on full-fledged Islamic banks

and small sized conventional banks of Pakistan. Different countries around the world apply different national

accounting standards, disclosure and listing requirements. These differences can also affect the results of this model

in other regions, as Pulic’s model used in this study takes accounting data from published annual reports in a

specific country. Now, Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan is taking active steps to adopt International

Financial Reporting Standards like many other regions of the world which will mitigate the comparison problems

due to differences in accounting rules of different countries. The validity of the study can be criticized on the

grounds of VAIC method, which is used in research for measuring IC efficiency. But, it should be considered that

until now, no method of measuring either IC or IC efficiency has been admitted as perfect by the researchers’

community. However, reliability of the study is good and based on population, as all Islamic banks are considered

for research, and data used in the study was recorded by qualified accountants, testified by the management and

audited by the external auditor. Since data related to private limited banks is not publicly available. So the results of

this research may not be generalized to non-listed banks. This study is focused on Islamic banking sector of

Pakistan. So generalizabilty of results is somewhat lower for Islamic banks of other countries due to special

economic situation of Pakistan, as the cultural and legal environment of every economy is different and the research

is not set in that environmental context. Time and cost constraints are the major limitations. Only secondary data is

used for the current research. Inference based on primary data could be more accurate and clear. As some of the

Islamic banks are not listed in Pakistani stock exchanges, so the share prices of these banks cannot be found for

calculation of market capitalization of these banks.

ijcrb.webs.com



419

MAY 2012

VOL 4, NO 1

References

1. Abdullah, Y., & Metin, C. (2007). Intellectual capital performance of quoted banks on the Istanbul stock

exchange market. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(2), 256-271

2. Bukh, P. N. (2003). The relevance of intellectual capital disclosure: a paradox? Accounting, Auditing &

Accountability Journal, 16(1), 49-56.

3. Chen, M. C., Cheng, S. J., & Hwang, Y. (2005). An empirical investigation of the relationship between

intellectual capital and firmsâ€™ market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(2),

159-176.

4. Ching Choo, H., Robert, L., & Michael, T. (2007). An evidence-based taxonomy of intellectual capital.

Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(3), 386-408.

5. Dimitrios, M., Dimitrios, C., Charalampos, T., & Georgios, T. (2011). The impact of intellectual capital on

firms' market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(1), 132-151.

6. Dimitrios, M., Dimitrios, C., Charalampos, T., & Georgios, T. (2011). The impact of intellectual capital on

firms' market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(1), 132-151.

7. Firer, S., & Williams, S. M. (2003). Intellectual capital and traditional measures of corporate performance.


8. Goh, P. C. (2005). Intellectual capital performance of commercial banks in Malaysia. Journal of

Intellectual Capital, 6(3), 385-396.

9. Johnson, H. T., & Kaplan, R. S. (1987). Relevance lost: The rise and fall of management accounting:

Harvard Business School Pr.

10. Kamath, G. B. (2007). The intellectual capital performance of the Indian banking sector. Journal of


11. Kamath, G. B. (2008). Intellectual capital and corporate performance in Indian pharmaceutical industry.


12. Kamath, G. B. (2010). The intellectual capital performance of banking sector in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal

of commerce and social sciences, 4(1), 84-99. 13. Kin Hang, C. (2009). Impact of intellectual capital on organizational performance: An empirical study of

companies in the Hang Seng Index (Part 1). Learning Organization, The, 16(1), 4-21.

14. Makki, M. A. M., & Lodhi, S. A. (2008). Impact of Intellectual Capital Efficiency on Profitability (A Case

Study of LSE25 Companies) The Lahore Journal of Economics 13(2), pp. 81-98

15. Makki, M. A. M., & Lodhi, S. A. (2009). Impact of Intellectual Capital on Return on Investment in

Pakistani corporate Sector. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(3), 2995-3007.

16. Makki, M. A. M., Lodhi, S. A., & Rahman, R. (2008). Intellectual Capital Performance of Pakistani Listed

Corporate Sector. international journal of business and Management, 3(10).

17. Malik, M. S., Malik, A., & Mustafa, W. (2011). Controversies that make Islamic banking controversial: An

analysis of issues and challenges. Am. J. Soc. Mgmt. Sci, 2(1), 41-46.

18. Mavridis, D. G. (2004). The intellectual capital performance of the Japanese banking sector. Journal of


19. Mavridis, D. G., & Kyrmizoglou, P. (2005). Intellectual capital performance drivers in Ming-Chin, C.,

Shu-Ju, C., & Yuhchang, H. (2005). An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and

firmsâ€™ market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(2), 159-176.

20. the Greek banking sector. Management Research News, 28(5), 43-62.

21. Pek Chen, G. (2005). Intellectual capital performance of commercial banks in Malaysia. Journal of


22. Pulic, A. (1998). Measuring the performance of intellectual potential in the knowledge economy.

23. Pulic, A. (2000a). MVA and VAIC analysis of randomly selected companies from FTSE 250. available at:

www. vaic-on. net/downloads/ftse30. pdf

24. Pulic, A. (2000b). VAIC “an accounting tool for IC management. International Journal of Technology

Management, 20(5), 702-714.

25. Pulic, A. (2001). Value creation efficiency analysis of Croatian banks 1996-2000. available at: www. vaic-

on. net.

26. Pulic, A. (2004). Do we know if we create or destroy value? International Journal of Entrepreneurship and

Innovation Management, 4(4), 349-359.

ijcrb.webs.com



420

MAY 2012

VOL 4, NO 1

27. Pulic, A., & Bornemann, M. (1999). The physical and intellectual capital of Austrian banks. available at:

www. vaic-on. net/download/Papers/Physical% 20and% 20intellectual% 20Capital% 20of% 20Austrain%

20Banks. htm

28. Rehman, W., Ilyas, M., & Rehman, H. (2011). Intellectual capital performance and its impact on financial

returns of companies: An empirical study from insurance sector of Pakistan. African Journal of Business

Management, 5(20), 8041-8049.

29. Roos, G., & Roos, J. (1997). Measuring your company's intellectual performance. Long Range Planning,

30(3), 413-426.

30. Shiu, H. J. (2006). The application of the value added intellectual coefficient to measure corporate

performance: evidence from technological firms. International Journal of Management, 23(2), 356-365.

31. Suresh, C. (2005). Intellectual capital-in-action and value creation: A case study of knowledge

transformations in an innovation project. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(3), 357-373.

32. Tseng, C. Y., & James Goo, Y. J. (2005). Intellectual capital and corporate value in an emerging economy:

empirical study of Taiwanese manufacturers. R&D Management, 35(2), 187-201.

33. Watters, J., Jackson, F., & Russell Wang, J. C. (2008). Investigating market value and intellectual capital

for S&P 500. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4), 546-563.

34. Williams, S. M. (2001). Is intellectual capital performance and disclosure practices related? Journal of


intellectual capital efficiency and …kamath (2008) conducted research on drug and pharmaceutical...

Documents