intense laser interactions with h 2 + and d 2 + : a computational project
DESCRIPTION
Intense LASER interactions with H 2 + and D 2 + : A Computational Project. Ted Cackowski. Project Description. Assisting the multiple-body-mechanics group at KSU with calculations of H 2 + /D 2 + behavior under the influence of a short, yet intense laser pulse. Motivation. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
-
Intense LASER interactions with H2+ and D2+:A Computational Project Ted Cackowski
-
Project DescriptionAssisting the multiple-body-mechanics group at KSU with calculations of H2+/D2+ behavior under the influence of a short, yet intense laser pulse.
-
MotivationTo explore the validity of the Axial Recoil ApproximationExploring the quantum mechanics of H2+/D2+ in a time-varying electric field under various experimental conditionsExploring the quantum dynamics there afterward
-
Modes of OperationSchrdinger's Equation
and the associated quantum mechanicsFortran 90/95
-
Process Overview
-
Physical Situation
-
Scales of Physical InterestLaser Intensity: ~1E14 watts/cm2Pulse Length: ~7E -15 s (femtoseconds)Frequency: 790E-9 m (nanometers)H2/D2 Nuclear Separation: ~3E-10 m (angstroms)
-
Diatomic HydrogenTwo protons, two electronsBorn-Oppenheimer ApproximationFirst Electrons, then Nuclei
-
Figure 1
-
H2+ MoleculeThere are two separate pulses.Ionizing pulse gives us our computational starting pointFranck-Condon Approximation
-
Figure 2
-
Note on CompletenessThe Overlap Integral
Where, |FCV|2 are bound/unbound probabilitiesUnavoidable dissociation by ionizationControlled dissociation
-
MechanicsThe second pulse is the dissociating pulse.We now have the Hamiltonian of interestDipole Approximation
-
Linear MethodsWe expand Yinitial onto an orthonormal basisOverlap integral / Fouriers trickWe then generate the matrix H as in
Propagate the vector through time using an arsenal of numerical techniques
-
Data ProductionAfter producing a nuclear wave function associated with a particular dissociation channel, any physical observable can be predicted.Density Plots are probability density plots (*)
-
Channels
-
Notable Observables Angular distribution of dissociationas it depends on:Pulse DurationPulse Intensity Carrier Envelope Phase (CEP)
-
My WorkComputational OversightTwo Fortran ProgramsFirst: Calculate the evolution of the wave function when the Electric field is non-negligibleSecond: Calculate the evolution of the wave function when the Electric field is negligibleProduce measurable numbers
-
Afore Mentioned Figure
-
Chart7
4.1422509671
1.2452270279
0.200758006
Pulse Length (Femtoseconds)
Percent Change in
Alignment VS. Pulse DurationFor H2+, CEP Zero, 1E13
Sheet1
MoleculeFWHMIntensityAll TimeCEP(Pi)InitialFinalChange
H2+55.00E+1324500.543309960.60298110.9828724657
5.00E+1320000.54330418510.60265710.9244170198
6.00E+1320000.55387961310.61978611.8990454483
7.00E+1320000.56587947080.63428512.0883567518
8.00E+1320000.5781466730.64993912.4176667137
9.00E+1320000.58934964420.66591912.9921781672
1.00E+14200000.72409736640.80093110.6109533236
1.00E+1424500.598992060.6764112.9247022072
0.25FUTURE WORK
0.5FUTURE WORK
0.75FUTURE WORK
1FUTURE WORK
1.25FUTURE WORK
1.5FUTURE WORK
1.75FUTURE WORK
71.00E+1420000FUTURE WORK
0.25FUTURE WORK
0.5FUTURE WORK
0.75FUTURE WORK
1FUTURE WORK
1.25FUTURE WORK
1.5FUTURE WORK
1.75FUTURE WORK
101.00E+1320000.52321799740.5448914.1422509671
5.00E+1320000.64464414020.71107710.3053538687
5.00E+1340000.64464414020.71107710.3053538687
6.00E+1320000.66603451090.73673210.6146885718
7.00E+1320000.68466848720.75821910.7425000833
8.00E+1320000.70057501970.7758810.7490244761
9.00E+1320000.71357862140.78948210.6370028992
1.00E+1420000.72409736650.80093110.6109533111
451.00E+1320000.63963212790.6475971.2452270279
1351.00E+1320000.68101181430.6823790.200758006
D2+51.00E+14200000.52475105660.60546815.3819496603
0.250.58739704350.6439389.6256794404
0.50.58880563540.6449329.532239707
0.750.59498241220.6504899.3291140433
10.59267184270.6488179.473228401
1.250.59047628680.6468739.5510547027
1.50.58697296430.6434849.6275363875
1.750.59227892390.6472239.2767231579
71.00E+14200000.62461832730.69707511.6001515672
0.250
0.50
0.750.62489009340.69721711.5743404078
10.62535363320.69766111.5626363906
1.250.62409046170.69663711.6243626141
1.50.62305234090.69572511.6639733701
1.750.62387447140.69636211.6189284797
101.00E+1420000.68032699530.75999911.7108398261
Sheet1
Intensity (Watts/(cm^2))
Percent Change in
Alignment VS. Electric Field StrengthFor H2+, 5fs, CEP Zero
Sheet2
Intensity (Watts/(cm^2))
Percent change in
Alignment VS. Electric Field StrengthFor H2+, 10fs, CEP Zero
Sheet3
Pulse Length (Femtoseconds)
Percent Change in
Alignment VS. Pulse DurationFor H2+, CEP Zero, 1E13
-
Chart3
10.9244170198
11.8990454483
12.0883567518
12.4176667137
12.9921781672
10.6109533236
Intensity (Watts/(cm^2))
Percent Change in
Alignment VS. Electric Field StrengthFor H2+, 5fs, CEP Zero
Sheet1
MoleculeFWHMIntensityAll TimeCEP(Pi)InitialFinalChange
H2+55.00E+1324500.543309960.60298110.9828724657
5.00E+1320000.54330418510.60265710.9244170198
6.00E+1320000.55387961310.61978611.8990454483
7.00E+1320000.56587947080.63428512.0883567518
8.00E+1320000.5781466730.64993912.4176667137
9.00E+1320000.58934964420.66591912.9921781672
1.00E+14200000.72409736640.80093110.6109533236
1.00E+1424500.598992060.6764112.9247022072
0.25FUTURE WORK
0.5FUTURE WORK
0.75FUTURE WORK
1FUTURE WORK
1.25FUTURE WORK
1.5FUTURE WORK
1.75FUTURE WORK
71.00E+1420000FUTURE WORK
0.25FUTURE WORK
0.5FUTURE WORK
0.75FUTURE WORK
1FUTURE WORK
1.25FUTURE WORK
1.5FUTURE WORK
1.75FUTURE WORK
101.00E+1320000.52321799740.5448914.1422509671
5.00E+1320000.64464414020.71107710.3053538687
5.00E+1340000.64464414020.71107710.3053538687
6.00E+1320000.66603451090.73673210.6146885718
7.00E+1320000.68466848720.75821910.7425000833
8.00E+1320000.70057501970.7758810.7490244761
9.00E+1320000.71357862140.78948210.6370028992
1.00E+1420000.72409736650.80093110.6109533111
451.00E+1320000.63963212790.6475971.2452270279
1351.00E+1320000.68101181430.6823790.200758006
D2+51.00E+14200000.52475105660.60546815.3819496603
0.250.58739704350.6439389.6256794404
0.50.58880563540.6449329.532239707
0.750.59498241220.6504899.3291140433
10.59267184270.6488179.473228401
1.250.59047628680.6468739.5510547027
1.50.58697296430.6434849.6275363875
1.750.59227892390.6472239.2767231579
71.00E+14200000.62461832730.69707511.6001515672
0.250
0.50
0.750.62489009340.69721711.5743404078
10.62535363320.69766111.5626363906
1.250.62409046170.69663711.6243626141
1.50.62305234090.69572511.6639733701
1.750.62387447140.69636211.6189284797
101.00E+1420000.68032699530.75999911.7108398261
Sheet1
Intensity (Watts/(cm^2))
Percent Change in
Alignment VS. Electric Field StrengthFor H2+, 5fs, CEP Zero
Sheet2
Sheet3
-
Chart5
10.3053538687
10.6146885718
10.7425000833
10.7490244761
10.6370028992
10.6109533111
Intensity (Watts/(cm^2))
Percent change in
Alignment VS. Electric Field StrengthFor H2+, 10fs, CEP Zero
Sheet1
MoleculeFWHMIntensityAll TimeCEP(Pi)InitialFinalChange
H2+55.00E+1324500.543309960.60298110.9828724657
5.00E+1320000.54330418510.60265710.9244170198
6.00E+1320000.55387961310.61978611.8990454483
7.00E+1320000.56587947080.63428512.0883567518
8.00E+1320000.5781466730.64993912.4176667137
9.00E+1320000.58934964420.66591912.9921781672
1.00E+14200000.72409736640.80093110.6109533236
1.00E+1424500.598992060.6764112.9247022072
0.25FUTURE WORK
0.5FUTURE WORK
0.75FUTURE WORK
1FUTURE WORK
1.25FUTURE WORK
1.5FUTURE WORK
1.75FUTURE WORK
71.00E+1420000FUTURE WORK
0.25FUTURE WORK
0.5FUTURE WORK
0.75FUTURE WORK
1FUTURE WORK
1.25FUTURE WORK
1.5FUTURE WORK
1.75FUTURE WORK
101.00E+1320000.52321799740.5448914.1422509671
5.00E+1320000.64464414020.71107710.3053538687
5.00E+1340000.64464414020.71107710.3053538687
6.00E+1320000.66603451090.73673210.6146885718
7.00E+1320000.68466848720.75821910.7425000833
8.00E+1320000.70057501970.7758810.7490244761
9.00E+1320000.71357862140.78948210.6370028992
1.00E+1420000.72409736650.80093110.6109533111
451.00E+1320000.63963212790.6475971.2452270279
1351.00E+1320000.68101181430.6823790.200758006
D2+51.00E+14200000.52475105660.60546815.3819496603
0.250.58739704350.6439389.6256794404
0.50.58880563540.6449329.532239707
0.750.59498241220.6504899.3291140433
10.59267184270.6488179.473228401
1.250.59047628680.6468739.5510547027
1.50.58697296430.6434849.6275363875
1.750.59227892390.6472239.2767231579
71.00E+14200000.62461832730.69707511.6001515672
0.250
0.50
0.750.62489009340.69721711.5743404078
10.62535363320.69766111.5626363906
1.250.62409046170.69663711.6243626141
1.50.62305234090.69572511.6639733701
1.750.62387447140.69636211.6189284797
101.00E+1420000.68032699530.75999911.7108398261
Sheet1
Intensity (Watts/(cm^2))
Percent Change in
Alignment VS. Electric Field StrengthFor H2+, 5fs, CEP Zero
Sheet2
Intensity (Watts/(cm^2))
Percent change in
Alignment VS. Electric Field StrengthFor H2+, 10fs, CEP Zero
Sheet3
-
Chart9
15.3819496603
9.6256794404
9.532239707
9.3291140433
9.473228401
9.5510547027
9.6275363875
9.2767231579
CEP ( Pi )
Percent change in
Alignment VS. Carrier Envelope PhaseFor D2+, 5fs, 1E14
Sheet1
MoleculeFWHMIntensityAll TimeCEP(Pi)InitialFinalChange
H2+55.00E+1324500.543309960.60298110.9828724657
5.00E+1320000.54330418510.60265710.9244170198
6.00E+1320000.55387961310.61978611.8990454483
7.00E+1320000.56587947080.63428512.0883567518
8.00E+1320000.5781466730.64993912.4176667137
9.00E+1320000.58934964420.66591912.9921781672
1.00E+14200000.72409736640.80093110.6109533236
1.00E+1424500.598992060.6764112.9247022072
0.25FUTURE WORK
0.5FUTURE WORK
0.75FUTURE WORK
1FUTURE WORK
1.25FUTURE WORK
1.5FUTURE WORK
1.75FUTURE WORK
71.00E+1420000FUTURE WORK
0.25FUTURE WORK
0.5FUTURE WORK
0.75FUTURE WORK
1FUTURE WORK
1.25FUTURE WORK
1.5FUTURE WORK
1.75FUTURE WORK
101.00E+1320000.52321799740.5448914.1422509671
5.00E+1320000.64464414020.71107710.3053538687
5.00E+1340000.64464414020.71107710.3053538687
6.00E+1320000.66603451090.73673210.6146885718
7.00E+1320000.68466848720.75821910.7425000833
8.00E+1320000.70057501970.7758810.7490244761
9.00E+1320000.71357862140.78948210.6370028992
1.00E+1420000.72409736650.80093110.6109533111
451.00E+1320000.63963212790.6475971.2452270279
1351.00E+1320000.68101181430.6823790.200758006
D2+51.00E+14200000.52475105660.60546815.3819496603
0.250.58739704350.6439389.6256794404
0.50.58880563540.6449329.532239707
0.750.59498241220.6504899.3291140433
10.59267184270.6488179.473228401
1.250.59047628680.6468739.5510547027
1.50.58697296430.6434849.6275363875
1.750.59227892390.6472239.2767231579
71.00E+14200000.62461832730.69707511.6001515672
0.250
0.50
0.750.62489009340.69721711.5743404078
10.62535363320.69766111.5626363906
1.250.62409046170.69663711.6243626141
1.50.62305234090.69572511.6639733701
1.750.62387447140.69636211.6189284797
101.00E+1420000.68032699530.75999911.7108398261
Sheet1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Intensity (Watts/(cm^2))
Percent Change in
Alignment VS. Electric Field StrengthFor H2+, 5fs, CEP Zero
Sheet2
0
0
0
0
0
0
Intensity (Watts/(cm^2))
Percent change in
Alignment VS. Electric Field StrengthFor H2+, 10fs, CEP Zero
Sheet3
0
0
0
Pulse Length (Femtoseconds)
Percent Change in
Alignment VS. Pulse DurationFor H2+, CEP Zero, 1E13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CEP ( Pi )
Percent change in
Alignment VS. Electric Field StrengthFor D2+, 5fs, 1E14
-
ConclusionsRotational inertia plays an important rolePulse intensity is criticalFurther analysis will be required for pulse length and CEP
-
Future WorkSimulate H2+ under various CEP initial conditionsConfidence TestingData Interpretation Connect with JRM affiliates
-
Special Group ThanksDr. EsryFatima AnisYujun WangJianjun HuaErin Lynch
-
Special REU ThanksDr. WeaverDr. CorwinParticipantsJane Peterson
-
BibliographyFigure 1 from Max Planck institute for Quantum Optics website
Figure 2 from Wikipedia, Frank-Condonhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.mpq.mpg.de/~haensch/grafik/3DdistributionD.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.mpq.mpg.de/~haensch/htm/Research.htm&h=290&w=420&sz=24&hl=en&start=0&um=1&tbnid=rOBflIUYzSm7xM:&tbnh=86&tbnw=125&prev=/images%3Fq%3DH2%252B%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN