intercorporate equity investments revsine/collins/johnson: chapter 16
TRANSCRIPT
Intercorporate Equity Investments
Revsine/Collins/Johnson: Chapter 16
2RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Learning objectives
1. How a company benefits from owning another company’s common stock.
2. How and why an investor’s ownership share determines the accounting treatment for equity investments.
3. How the accounting for short-term speculative investments differs from the accounting for long-term investments.
4. The equity accounting method and when to use it.
5. What consolidated financial statements are, and how they are compiled.
3RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Learning objectives:Concluded
6. What goodwill is, and when it is shown on the financial statements.
7. How business acquisitions and mergers are recorded and why the recording method matters to statement readers.
8. How foreign subsidiaries are treated when financial statements in U.S. dollars are prepared.
4RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Overview
Financial Reporting Alternatives for Intercorporate Equity
5RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Minority passive investment:Trading securities
The entry to record the share purchases on 1/1/2005:
DR Trading securities –A Company common $10,000DR Trading securities –B Company preferred 20,000 CR Cash $30,000
The entry to record dividends declared:
DR Dividend receivable $1,000 CR Dividend income $1,000
6RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Minority passive investment:Trading securities—mark-to-market accounting
Step 1: The total market value of all trading securities is compared to the total cost of the securities. Any difference becomes the target
balance for the market adjustment account.
Step 2: Increase or decrease the market adjustment account so that it
equals the target balance.
7RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Minority passive investment:Trading securities—mark-to-market accounting
Once this entry is recorded, the balance sheet shows:
8RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
To record the purchases in 2006:
Minority passive investment:Trading securities—mark-to-market accounting
Mark-to-market adjustment at year end:
DR Trading securities –Company C common stock $30,000DR Trading securities –Company D stock options 40,000 CR Cash $70,000
9RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
The mark-to-market adjustment for 2007:
Minority passive investment:Trading securities—mark-to-market accounting
10RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
When trading securities are sold, a realized gain or loss is recorded.
Minority passive investment:Trading securities—mark-to-market accounting
Here’s what happens when Company B preferred stock is sold:
Selling priceRealized
gain or loss
Most recentmark-to-market
price= -
11RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
After the sale is recorded, the balance sheet shows:
Minority passive investment:Trading securities—mark-to-market accounting
The mark-to-market adjustment at the end of 2008 is:
12RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Mark-to-market accounting is used, but the adjustment is not included in income.
Instead, the upward or downward adjustment to reflect fair value is a direct (net of tax) credit or debit to a special owners’ equity account.
This special owners’ equity account is one of the “Other comprehensive income” components described in Chapter 2.
Minority passive investment:Available-for-sale securities
13RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
The 2005 year-end mark-to-market adjustment entry:
Minority passive investment:Available-for-sale securities illustration
DR Market adjustment –available-for-sale securities $5,000 CR Unrealized change in value of available-for -sale securities (owners’ equity) $3,250 CR Deferred income taxes (assumed 35% tax rate x $1,000) 1,750
The 2007 year-end mark-to-market adjustment entry:
DR Unrealized change in value of available-for -sale securities (owners’ equity) $650DR Deferred income taxes (assumed 35% tax rate x $1,000) 350 CR Market adjustment –available-for-sale securities $1,000
14RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Minority active investments:Equity method
When the ownership percentage equals
or exceeds 20%, GAAP presumes two
elements:
1. The investor can exert influence over the company.
2. The investment represents a continuing relationship between the two companies.
The accounting approach used for
minority passive investments is no
longer suitable.
15RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Minority active investments:GM’s investment in Fuji Industries
16RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Minority active investments:Equity method illustration
17RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Minority active investments:Equity method illustration (concluded)
Balance sheet amount at the end of 2005
18RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Minority active investments:Equity method when cost and book value differ
There are two reasons why Willis willingly paid more than book value for a 30% stake in Planet Burbank:
1. The books show balance sheet items at GAAP historical cost rather than current fair value.
2. The business is worth more than the sum of its individual parts (i.e., more than the current fair value of all balance sheet items). This is goodwill.
$24,000,000
19RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Minority active investments:Equity method—purchase price allocation
20RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Minority active investments:Equity method—purchase price allocation
21RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Minority active investments:Equity method journal entries
22RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Majority ownership
When the ownership percentage exceeds 50% of the voting shares, GAAP presumes the parent controls the subsidiary.
The financial statements of the subsidiary are then combined—line by line—with those of the parent using a process called consolidation.
This consolidation process occurs each reporting period.
If the ownership percentage is exactly 50% of the voting shares, the equity method is used and no line-by-line consolidation is necessary.
23RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Majority ownership:Presumptive control
According to the FASB, control is “the ability of one entity to direct the policies and management that guide the ongoing activities of another entity.” [FASB Exposure Draft, February 1999].
The Exposure Draft presumes that control exists if any of the following conditions are met:
Majority voting interest in the election of the board, or the right to appoint the majority of the board.
Large minority voting interest (e.g., more than 50% of the votes typically cast) and no other significant minority interest exists.
Convertible securities are owned which (if converted) would give it the right to obtain or appoint a majority of the board.
Consolidation would then be required unless presumptive control is temporary.
24RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Majority ownership:Consolidation example
Step 1: Identify all components of the “investment” account, and remove the book value amount.
Step 2: Eliminate and reclassify the remaining “investment” account components.
Step 3: Eliminate the “common stock” book value
amount.
25RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Majority ownership:Consolidation example (continued)
These are the surviving outside shareholders
Eliminates book value
Excess of purchase price over FMV
Increased to FMV
26RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Majority ownership:Consolidation example (concluded)
Journal entry to eliminate Gaston’s common stock account:
Journal entry to eliminate the remaining “investment” account balance:
27RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Majority ownership:Intercompany transactions—loans
Suppose that, prior to the acquisition, Gaston had borrowed $300,000 from Alphonse.
The adjusting entry made to eliminate this “internal” transaction is:
DR Loan payable –Gaston (on Alphonse’s books) $300,000 CR Loan receivable –Alphonse (on Gaston’s books) $300,000
Gaston’s payable
Alphonse’s receivable
$300,000 cash loan
28RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Majority ownership:Intercompany transactions—sales
Suppose that Alphonse sold goods to Gaston as follows:
Two things must happen to eliminate this intercompany sale:
Gaston’s COGS
Alphonse’s revenue
No change to gross margin
29RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Majority ownership:Minority interest
Suppose Alphonse only bought 80% of Gaston:
Consolidation is still required, but the financial statements will also reflect a minority interest in Gaston.
80%
20% Owned by other “minority” investors
Owned by Alphonse
Assets
Consolidated Balance sheet
Shareholders’equity
Minorityinterest
LiabilitiesProfit
Or loss
Consolidated Income statement
Availableto
Shareholders
Minorityinterest
= =
30RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Majority ownership:Minority interest example
Minority investors who retain a stake in Gaston
31RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Majority ownership:Minority interest adjusting entries
Excess of net asset FMV over BV
32RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Accounting goodwill Goodwill arises when the purchase price paid for another
business exceeds the fair market value of the acquired net assets of that business.
$10 million
$8 million
$1.5 million
$0.5 million Goodwill
Excess of net asset FMV over BV
Net asset BV
Prior to 2002, acquired goodwill in the U.S. was amortized to income over a period not exceeding 40 years.
SFAS No. 142 no longer permits amortization but instead requires periodic impairment tests.
Purchase price Allocation
33RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Accounting goodwill:Impairment
SFAS No. 142 Goodwill Impairment Test
34RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Accounting goodwill:Implementing the impairment test
35RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Accounting goodwill:When to test for impairment
SFAS No. 142 says impairment must be tested at least annually or when there is reason to suspect that the value of goodwill has been diminished.
Circumstances that might prompt an impairment test include: Significant adverse change in business climate. Adverse regulatory action or assessment. Unanticipated competition. Loss of key personnel. The reporting unit (to which the goodwill is attached) is likely to be
sold.
36RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Accounting goodwill:Goodwill impairment charges
37RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Purchase vs. pooling:Purchase method intuition
There has been a change in ownership.
Various assets are written up to their fair market value.
The excess (if any) of purchase price over FMV of net identifiable assets is assigned to goodwill.
Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to impairment testing.
B’s Owner’s
A’s owners
Cash
B shares
Purchase: A buys B
Surviving shareholders are those of A.
38RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Purchase vs. pooling:Pooling-of-interests method intuiton
There has NOT been a change in ownership.
Net assets remain at book value.
The purchase price does not appear on the consolidated books.
No goodwill is recorded.
This approach is no longer permitted (SFAS No. 141)
B’s Owner’s
A’s owners
A shares
B shares
Pooling: A and B merge
Surviving shareholders include those of A and those of B.
39RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Purchase accounting:How it complicates financial analysis
Amounts reported before the Sema acquisition in April 2002.
40RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Purchase accounting:Understanding revenue growth
As reported
Pro forma footnote
41RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Variable Interest Entities
A corporation, partnership, trust or other legal structure.
Does not have equity investors with voting rights, or
Has equity investors that do not provide sufficient financial resources for the entity to support its activities.
Major uses include selling receivables, securitizing loans and mortgages, synthetic leases, take-or-pay contracts.
FAS Interpretation 46 requires the VIE to be consolidated on the books of the primary beneficiary when:
The company is subject to the majority of the risk of loss from the VIE’s activities.
Or
The company is entitled to receive a majority of the VIE’s residual returns.
42RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Accounting for foreign subsidiaries:Overview
All majority-owned subsidiaries—foreign and domestic—must be consolidated.
An additional complication arises when consolidating a foreign subsidiary because the financial records are expressed in the foreign currency.
One of two procedures is used, depending on the operating characteristics of the foreign subsidiary:
Temporal method(remeasured)
Current rate method(translated)
Foreign sub is not self-sufficient
Foreign sub has self-contained foreign operations
Functional currency choice
43RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Accounting for foreign subsidiaries:Foreign currency transactions
On January 1, 2005 Yankee Corporation sells 100 units of its product to a U.K customer. The selling price is £10 per unit or £1,000 total. Payment is due on April 1, 2005. One British pound is worth $2 U.S., and the per-unit cost of production incurred by Yankee is $8.00
DR Accounts receivable $2,000 CR Sales revenue $2,000(To record the receivable of £1,000 at it 1/1/05 U.S. dollar equivalence of $2,000)
DR Cost of goods sold $800 CR Inventory $800(100 units@$8.00)
44RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Accounting for foreign subsidiaries:Foreign currency transactions—monetary assets
On January 1, 2005 Yankee Corporation sells 100 units of its product to a U.K customer. The selling price is £10 per unit or £1,000 total. Payment is due on April 1, 2005. One British pound is worth $2 U.S., and the per-unit cost of production incurred by Yankee is $8.00. By the end of the quarter, the value of a pound has fallen to only $1.80 U.S.
DR Foreign currency transaction loss $200 CR Accounts receivable $200(To reflect the £1,000 receivable at its end-of-quarter dollar equivalent of $1,800.)
DR Cash $1,800 CR Accounts receivable $1,800(To remove the receivable from the books. The initial $2,000 minus the 3/31/05 write-down of $200 equals the carrying amount of $1,800.)
45RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Accounting for foreign subsidiaries:Foreign currency transactions—nonmonetary assets
Suppose Yankee decides to purchase a warehouse in London for £300,000 when the exchange rate is $1.75 U.S. per British pound.
DR Warehouse building $525,800 CR Cash $525,000(To record the acquisition of the London warehouse at the U.S. dollar equivalent of the foreign currency transaction price: £300,000 x 1.75 = $525,000.)
46RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Accounting for foreign subsidiaries:Non-freestanding subsidiaries
Foreign subsidiary is merely an extension of the parent.
SFAS No. 52 says subsidiaries like this one are treated as if they were created for the sole purpose of facilitating foreign currency transactions.
The numbers included when consolidating the subsidiary are identical to the numbers that would have been included if the parent had engaged in the foreign transaction (temporal method).
DandyLtd
Doodle Corp
Inventories
Customers receipts
Cash Unshipped customer
inventory Warehouse
U.S. parent Foreign sub
47RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Accounting for foreign subsidiaries:Non-freestanding subsidiaries
48RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Accounting for foreign subsidiaries:Non-freestanding subsidiaries example
Dandy Ltd. received inventory cost $800 (£1 = $2) and sold the goods on credit for £1,000. The pound then falls to $1.80 when the receivables are collected. The company also purchased a building in London for £300,000 when the pound was worth $1.75.
49RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Accounting for foreign subsidiaries:Self-contained subsidiaries
Foreign subsidiary is self-contained—no transactions with the parent.
In this case, the effect of changes in exchange rates on future dollar cash flows to the parent is uncertain.
SFAS No. 52 requires the use of the current rate method, with translation “gains” or “losses” flowing directly into an owners’ equity account.
Swisscompany
U.S.Food
Foreigncustomers
Parent Foreign sub
Ship inventories
Customer receipts
50RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Accounting for foreign subsidiaries:Summary
Translation Approach Used in SFAS NO.52
51RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Accounting for foreign subsidiaries:Illustrative disclosure
52RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Accounting for foreign subsidiaries:Illustrative disclosure (continued)
53RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Summary
Financial reporting for intercorporate equity investments depends on the size of the parent company’s ownership shares.
When the ownership share is less than 20% (minority passive investment), mark-to-market accounting is used.
When the ownership share is from 20% to 50% (minority active investment), the equity method is used.
When the ownership share exceeds 50% (majority investment), full consolidation is required. Consolidation is also required when the ownership share is less than 50% but “presumptive control” exists, and for certain variable interest entities (VIEs).
54RCJ: Chapter 16 © 2005
Summary concluded
Accounting goodwill arises when the purchase price for another company exceeds the fair value of identifiable net assets.
Goodwill is no longer amortized to income, but it is subject to impairment tests.
The pooling-of-interests method for business combinations can no longer be used.
When freestanding foreign subsidiaries are consolidated with at U.S. company, the current rate method for foreign currency translation is used. When the foreign subsidiary is not freestanding, the temporal method is used.